| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2003;41:75.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Cornell Medical Center (V.P., P.M.O., J.N.B., R.B.D.), New York, New York; Haukeland Hospital (E.G.), Bergen, Norway; Copenhagen County University Hospital (K.W.), Glostrup, Denmark; St. John Hospital and Medical Center (J.G.), Detroit, Michigan; Veteran Affairs Medical Center (V.P.), Washington, DC; Helsinki University Central Hospital (M.S.N.), Helsinki, Finland; Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Östra (B.D.), Göteborg, Sweden.
Correspondence to Vittorio Palmieri, MD, Federico II University Hospital of Naples, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, via Pansini 5 (Ed. 1), Naples, Italy. E-mail: vpalmier{at}med.cornell.eduAddress for reprints: Richard B Devereux, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10021. E-mail rbdevere@med.cornell.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hypertension, arterial echocardiography hypertrophy ventricular function, left coronary heart disease risk factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hypertension is a major determinant of LV hypertrophy1 and is associated with increased prevalence of LV systolic dysfunction.6 However, global LV ejection fraction (EF), a measure of LV chamber function highly useful as an indicator of LV systolic dysfunction, can be normal despite segmental WM abnormalities, especially when EF is estimated from linear echocardiographic LV dimensions at mid-cavity level,7 or from single-plane contrast ventriculograms.
Two-dimensional echocardiography allows semi-quantitative assessment of WM abnormalities,24,8,9 which are pathophysiologically associated with CHD.4 Assessment of the prevalence of echocardiographic segmental and global WM abnormalities and their electrocardiographic, laboratory, and echocardiographic correlates may help identify subjects with higher cardiovascular event rates in hypertension. Therefore, we examined the prevalence and correlates of echocardiographic systolic WM abnormalities in a large sample of hypertensive adults with LV hypertrophy by ECG.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30 mg/g.
Echocardiography
A standard, reliable methodology was employed in the LIFE Echocardiography study to assess LV structure and function.11 Echocardiograms were recorded on video tapes and centrally read at the Echo-Reading Center following recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography13,14 by trained physician first readers (V.P., J.N.B.) and by a highly experienced second final arbiter (R.B.D.). Correct orientation of planes for imaging and Doppler recordings was verified using standard procedures.15 Two-dimensionally guided M-mode tracings were used, if correctly oriented, to measure LV structures,13 whereas linear measurements of LV structure were obtained in 2D parasternal long-axis view in the presence of low parasternal windows.14 LV measurements were averaged from 2 to 5 cardiac cycles in which LV diameter was maximized by using anatomically correct views. End-diastolic LV dimensions were used to calculate LV mass by a formula that yields values closely related (r=0.90) to necropsy LV weight.16 LV mass calculated by this method has stratified cardiovascular risk in the absence or presence of CHD or heart failure.1720 LV mass was indexed for height2.7. LV hypertrophy was defined as LV mass >46.7 g/m2.7 in women and >49.2 g/m2.7 in men. Doppler-derived stroke volume21 was used to calculate Doppler EF (Doppler stroke volume/LV end-diastolic volume by the Teichholz formula7) and cardiac index (stroke volumexheart rate/body surface area). Valvular disease was assessed, as previously described, by inspection of valvular morphology and leaflet mobility and Doppler echocardiography.22,23 Diastolic parameters were assessed as previously described.24
Assessment of WM Score
WM was assessed semiquantitatively in parasternal long- and short-axis views and apical views. In short-axis views, the LV was divided into 5 segments at the base and at papillary muscle level (anterior and posterior septum; anterior, lateral, and posterior walls) and into 4 segments at the apex (septum, anterior, lateral, and posterior walls).25 WM scoring was based on visual assessment of motion of LV segments in 2 or more views to estimate each segments contribution to systolic reduction of LV volume. A score of 4.5 was assigned to each segment with normal thickening (
30%); scores of 3.5, 2.5, and 1.5 were assigned to mildly (wall thickening 20% to 29%), moderately (wall thickening 10% to 19%), and severely (wall thickening <10%) hypokinetic segments, respectively; 0 was assigned to akinetic and -1 to dyskinetic (no appreciable wall thickening with systolic movement away from the center of the LV) segments. As reported previously,26 EF derived from WM score was calculated by adding the score of each segment; the maximum value was obtained as 4.5x14=63% assumed as normal EF, which was derived as the mean value of EF in an ethnically diverse group of apparently normal adults. In the presence of left-bundle branch block, normal WM was assigned if wall thickening was preserved. In a separate series of 111 echocardiograms repeated twice 1 to 4 weeks apart,27 we found good reliability of the total WM score (intraclass correlation coefficient for single measurement absolute agreement, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 69 to 84; reliability coefficient
, 0.87;
for normal/abnormal WM, 0.6; P<0.001).
Statistical Analysis
Mean±standard deviation for continuous variables and percentages for discrete variables are reported. The study population was divided into groups of those with normal WM and those with segmental or global systolic dysfunction. Analysis of variance, with correction for multiple comparisons by Scheffé and Dunnett T3 post hoc tests, was used to compare continuous variables among groups. Log transformation was used when needed for parametric tests. Differences in proportions among groups were tested by
2 statistic. A series of logistic regression analyses were developed, using a forward method to enter or remove (for P>0.1) variables, to assess correlates of WM abnormalities; adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived; WM abnormalities were the dependent variables, first considered as pooled together; segmental and global abnormalities were subsequently analyzed separately; multivariate logistic models first considered clinical and laboratory data as independent variables, then added ECG variables, and finally added echocardiographic findings to the set of covariates. Cornell voltage-duration product was coded in 2 dummy variables, one indicating Cornell voltage-duration product values between the mean and 1 standard deviation above the mean of the study population (2483 to 3594 mVxms) and another indicating Cornell voltage-duration products >3594 mVxms (>1 standard deviation from the mean). Both variables were simultaneously included in logistic models. A supplemental analysis assessed differences between patients with WM abnormalities who had clinical CHD and/or ECG signs of myocardial infarction or who had clinically silent WM abnormalities, using the t test for independent groups and the Fisher exact test for proportions. Two-tailed P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Demographic and Clinical Correlates of Segmental and Global Wall Motion Abnormalities
As may be seen in Table 2, patients with global LV WM abnormality were slightly older than those with normal LV function. The proportion of men in the groups with segmental or global dysfunction was greater than in the group without WM abnormalities. BMI and prevalence of diabetes did not differ among groups, nor did the prevalences of present or former smoking or alcohol consumption (data not shown, all P=NS).
|
The prevalence of clinical CHD was almost twice as high among patients with segmental or global abnormalities than among those with normal LV systolic function. However, <40% of patients with WM abnormalities reported CHD (Table 2). In particular, self-reported myocardial infarction was about 2-fold higher in those with segmental or global abnormalities than in those without WM abnormalities. The prevalence of myocardial infarction indicated by ECG was slightly higher than that by self-report and was 2- to 3-fold more frequent with global or segmental WM abnormalities than with normal LV systolic function. Clinical CHD or ECG signs of myocardial infarction were equally prevalent with segmental or global WM abnormalities and also occurred in almost one fourth of patients without LV WM abnormalities. Cornell voltage-duration product and the prevalence of ST strain were both higher in patients with WM abnormalities, without differences between segmental or global dysfunction groups.
Systolic and diastolic BP and heart rate did not differ among groups (Table 2). Mean total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol values were lower in patients with segmental or global LV dysfunction; 7% of subjects without WM abnormalities, 13% of those with segmental, and 4% of those with global abnormalities were on lipid-lowering drugs, mostly statins (P=NS). The total/HDL-cholesterol ratio was minimally higher with segmental and global WM abnormalities (data not shown). Albuminuria was greater in patients with segmental and global abnormalities. The proportion of patients who had taken ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers or diuretics, or nitrates did not significantly differ among the 3 groups (data not shown, all P>0.1). In the group of patients with global WM abnormalities, we found a slightly higher proportion of subjects undergoing treatment with antiplatelet agents (42%) or digitalis (15%) than in the group with normal WM (antiplatelet agents, 25%; digitalis, 2.5%) or segmental WM abnormalities (antiplatelet agents, 38%; digitalis, 2.5%; both P<0.005).
Echocardiographic Findings in Patients Stratified According to Wall Motion Abnormalities
As reported in Table 3, LV wall thicknesses were similar in groups with or without WM abnormalities. LV diameter, mass, and prevalence of LV hypertrophy were higher with segmental or global WM abnormalities. Prevalence of eccentric LV hypertrophy was higher in the groups with WM abnormalities (73% with segmental, 72% with global) than in the group with no WM abnormalities (P<0.001); prevalence of concentric LV hypertrophy did not differ among the 3 groups (17% with segmental and 20% with global WM abnormalities, 28% with normal WM, P=0.1). Left atrial diameter was greater in the group with global dysfunction than in that without WM abnormalities. No difference in aortic root diameter was seen among groups, but aortic valve fibrocalcification was more frequent with global WM abnormalities. Doppler-derived LV EF and, by definition, EF from WM scores were lower in patients with WM abnormalities and were slightly lower with global compared with segmental abnormalities (Table 3). Doppler-derived cardiac index was equally reduced with segmental or global dysfunction. After adjustment for age and gender, on average, isovolumic relaxation time (123 ms with segmental and 116 ms with global WM abnormalities versus 115 ms with normal WM, all P>0.1) and E wave deceleration time (197 ms with segmental and 203 ms with global WM abnormalities versus 217 ms with normal WM, all P>0.3) did not differ significantly among the 3 groups. E/A ratio was significantly higher in the group with global WM abnormality than in those with normal WM (1.04 versus 0.86, P<0.01), whereas there was no significant difference between those with segmental WM abnormalities and those with normal WM (0.96 versus 0.86, P>0.2).
|
Mitral regurgitation, predominantly mild, occurred in 24% to 30% of the 3 groups (NS). Similarly, there was no difference among groups in the prevalence of aortic regurgitation (13% to 21%), aortic stenosis (0% to 3%), or mitral stenosis (0.1%). Mitral anular calcification was detected in 48% to 55% of those in the 3 groups (P=NS).
Multivariate Analysis: Correlates of Wall Motion Abnormalities
A first set of logistic models (Table 4) considered WM abnormalities as the dependent variable and clinical and laboratory information (age, BMI, gender, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, self-reported CHD, pulse pressure, mean BP, albuminuria, and total and HDL cholesterol) as independent variables. Male gender, albuminuria, CHD, and lower total cholesterol were correlates of WM abnormalities (either segmental or global) (Table 4). In a second logistic model, segmental LV dysfunction was related to lower total cholesterol but not to other variables. Another logistic model showed that global WM abnormalities were associated with male gender, CHD, and albuminuria.
|
A second set of logistic models added myocardial infarction by ECG, ST strain, and Cornell voltage-duration product to the set of independent variables considered above. As shown in Table 5, WM abnormalities (either segmental or global) were associated with male gender, albuminuria, lower cholesterol, and higher Cornell voltage-duration product, but not other variables. In a second logistic model, segmental LV dysfunction was associated with lower total cholesterol, greater albuminuria, and Cornell voltage-duration product. A subsequent logistic model showed associations of global WM abnormalities with male gender and albuminuria.
|
A final set of logistic models added echocardiographic LV hypertrophy and aortic valve fibrocalcification to the clinical, laboratory, and ECG data. WM abnormalities (either segmental or global) were related to male gender, albuminuria, lower total cholesterol, elevated Cornell voltage-duration product, and echocardiographic LV hypertrophy, but not other variables (Table 6). Segmental WM abnormalities were independently related to lower total cholesterol and higher Cornell voltage-duration product and global WM abnormalities to male gender, echocardiographic LV hypertrophy, and aortic valve fibrocalcification.
|
Comparison Between Patients With or Without Clinical Coronary Heart Disease Among Those With Echocardiographic WM Abnormalities
An exploratory analysis evaluated clinical, laboratory, ECG, and echocardiographic characteristics of patients with WM abnormalities with or without clinical CHD or myocardial infarction on ECG. Segmental WM abnormalities accounted for 55% and 51% of WM abnormalities in patients with or without evidence of CHD (NS). As summarized in Table 7, patients with clinical CHD or ECG myocardial infarction were slightly older, were more likely to have ECG strain, and had higher diastolic BP than patients with clinically silent WM abnormalities. They also had slightly lower BMI and higher Cornell voltage-duration product.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our study, fewer than half of patients with segmental or global LV WM abnormalities had overt CHD. Autopsy data suggest low sensitivity of clinical data for significant CHD.33 In multivariate models, clinical CHD independently predicted WM abnormalities and was more strongly associated with global than with segmental dysfunction (Table 4). However, when ECG and echocardiographic LV hypertrophy were included in the independent variables, self-reported CHD was excluded from multivariate models (Tables 5 and 6). This suggests that target organ damage is more strongly associated with WM abnormalities than with clinical information in hypertensive patients, consistent with previous evidence that echocardiographic findings in hypertensive patients predict cardiovascular events independent of clinical findings.34,35 Consequently, risk stratification of those patients, even if screened for LV hypertrophy by ECG, was significantly refined by echocardiography.
Segmental WM abnormalities can be related to subclinical coronary artery disease.4 Up to one third of acute myocardial infarctions can be clinically silent;36,37 up to 30% of acute myocardial infarctions never manifest diagnostic Q waves; a diagnostic Q wave disappears in 10% to 30% of Q-wave infarctions38 or is not diagnostic 2 years after an acute myocardial infarction.39 Therefore, silent ischemia or myocardial infarction or chronic ischemia/hibernating myocardium may cause WM abnormalities at rest. Although mild hypokinesis may be a normal variant,40 hypokinesis is strongly associated with significant CHD.4 Furthermore, even mild WM abnormalities may improve with coronary revascularization.4,41
Interestingly, both Cornell voltage-duration product and anatomic LV hypertrophy were independently associated with WM abnormalities, whereas ST strain did not enter multivariate models. ST strain is associated with LV hypertrophy12 independently of overt CHD.42 In univariate analyses, ST strain was 2- to 3-fold more frequent in the presence of WM abnormalities (Table 2). In subjects with WM abnormalities, ST strain was 4-fold more frequent in those with than in those without CHD, suggesting that ST strain is associated with both LV hypertrophy and overt ischemic disease. Conversely, no clinical, laboratory, or echocardiographic differences were found between subjects with clinically overt or silent WM abnormalities (Table 7). Therefore, WM abnormalities may be independent signs of coronary disease even in asymptomatic patients.
Patients with LV WM abnormalities had greater albuminuria, a potential marker of microangiopathy.43 This finding was confirmed in all multivariate analyses that pooled segmental and global abnormalities, and in some, but not all, multivariate analyses considering segmental or global dysfunction separately. Of particular note, albuminuria was associated with segmental or global LV systolic dysfunction independently of clinically overt CHD.
Surprisingly, total and HDL cholesterol levels were lower in patients with WM abnormalities. Because use of lipid lowering drugs was similar among the 3 groups, unmeasured lifestyle and diet modifications may be responsible for this finding. On the other hand, benefits associated with relatively low cholesterol level may have permitted patients with LV MW abnormalities plus LV hypertrophy to maintain adequate EF (>40%) for enrollment in the LIFE study. Furthermore, the modest inotropic effect of digoxin, used more commonly in patients with global LV WM abnormality, may have slightly diminished the degree of LV systolic dysfunction in this group.
In the study population, men had more LV WM abnormalities than women, as previously reported.5 In multivariate analysis, male gender had a strong association with segmental and especially global WM abnormalities (odds ratios 2.5 to 3.3 and 5.3 to 7.5), independently of covariates, including diabetes, alcohol consumption, and smoking.
A potential limitation of our study is that echocardiographic LV WM was assessed only at rest, because of the nature of the LIFE study. Neither WM abnormalities during stress, nor coronary morphology or myocardial perfusion studies are available. Therefore, pathophysiologic inferences from our results need to be made with caution. Our findings also need extension to patients with milder hypertension. However, it is relevant that subjects with clinically silent WM abnormalities did not differ from those with WM abnormalities and overt CHD in clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic findings, suggesting that in our study population both "silent" WM abnormalities and those associated with symptoms or ECG signs of CHD are most likely manifestations of coronary artery disease.9
Perspective
In ambulatory patients with long-standing arterial hypertension, wall motion abnormalities, mostly a manifestation of CHD, were associated with male gender, higher Cornell voltage-duration product, and increased echocardiographic LV mass and albuminuria, whereas clinical and ECG information correlated poorly with WM abnormalities.
Conclusions
Echocardiographic LV WM abnormalities occurred in about one eighth of patients with moderately severe hypertension as manifested by BP level and presence of ECG-LV hypertrophy, despite the exclusion of patients with overt heart failure, recent myocardial infarction or stroke, or clinical need for beta-blocker or ACE-inhibitor therapy. WM abnormalities were associated with greater Cornell voltage-duration product and anatomic LV mass, male gender, and microangiopathy independently of overt CHD.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 13, 2002; first decision September 20, 2002; accepted October 23, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Dodd, G. Holmvang, U. Hoffmann, M. Ferencik, S. Abbara, T. J. Brady, and R. C. Cury Quantification of Left Ventricular Noncompaction and Trabecular Delayed Hyperenhancement with Cardiac MRI: Correlation with Clinical Severity Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 974 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cicala, G. de Simone, M. J. Roman, L. G. Best, E. T. Lee, W. Wang, T. K. Welty, J. M. Galloway, B. V. Howard, and R. B. Devereux Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Wall-Motion Abnormalities in Adults Without Clinically Recognized Cardiovascular Disease: The Strong Heart Study Circulation, July 10, 2007; 116(2): 143 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Delgado-Almeida Back to the Basic: Measuring QRS Voltage-Interval in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Hypertension, December 1, 2004; 44(6): e13 - e13. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |