(Hypertension. 2003;41:669.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Physiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.
Correspondence to Brett M. Mitchell, MS, Department of Physiology, CL-3162, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912. E-mail brettmitchell{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: glucocorticoids endothelial nitric oxide synthase endothelium hypertension, experimental
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NO plays a key role in vascular tone, and decreases in NO production and bioavailability have been shown to reduce endothelium-dependent dilation and increase blood pressure. NO can be produced by the conversion of arginine and oxygen to citrulline via 3 isoforms of NO synthase (NOS). Endothelial NOS (eNOS) requires the cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), which aids in the stabilization of the eNOS dimer and increases the affinity of eNOS for arginine.7 BH4 is produced via a de novo pathway from guanosine-triphosphate (GTP) by GTP cyclohydrolase I (GTPCH1), the rate-limiting enzyme. BH4 can also be produced via a salvage pathway in which sepiapterin is converted to the intermediate dihydrobiopterin by sepiapterin reductase and then to BH4.8 GTPCH1 activity can be regulated by end-product inhibition via the GTP cyclohydrolase feedback regulatory protein (GFRP).9
In the presence of low levels of BH4, eNOS can become uncoupled and generate increased superoxide anions and decreased NO, both of which contribute to endothelial dysfunction and increased blood pressure.1012 Exogenous BH4 has been shown to restore endothelial function in humans with coronary artery disease13 and to suppress the development of elevated blood pressure when given to the spontaneously hypertensive rat, a genetic form of hypertension.14 Taken together, these observations suggest that BH4 levels are decreased and/or BH4 biosynthesis is altered in these disease conditions.
We have previously shown that rats with glucocorticoid hypertension (dexamethasone, 0.79 mg · kg-1 · d-1 for 20 days) have reduced BH4-dependent vasodilation, and vessels incubated with dexamethasone have decreased GTPCH1 mRNA expression levels.5 With respect to NO, Wallerath et al15 found that eNOS mRNA expression was downregulated in aortas from rats treated with dexamethasone in the drinking water (0.3 mg · kg-1 · d-1). Expression of eNOS mRNA was decreased to 60% to 70% of control values within 3 days and remained at this level over 9 days. In addition, systolic blood pressure was increased to
140 mm Hg, and endothelium-dependent dilation to acetylcholine was decreased. Because superoxide anions can be produced by eNOS in the presence of low levels of BH4, it is possible that the downregulation of GTPCH1 by glucocorticoids may precede eNOS downregulation, thus causing increased oxidative stress, which contributes to the decreased NO bioavailability and elevated blood pressure. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to examine the time-course of the downregulation of GTPCH1 and its role in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid hypertension in rats. Experiments were performed 12 hours, 4 days, or 15 days after beginning dexamethasone treatment to examine the role of GTPCH1 in the onset, development, and maintenance of hypertension, respectively. We hypothesized that a time-dependent downregulation of GTPCH1 would decrease endothelium-dependent dilation and contribute to the increased blood pressure in rats made hypertensive with synthetic glucocorticoids.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After baseline blood pressure measurements, rats were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine cocktail (10 mg/kg IM) and were subcutaneously implanted with a pellet (Innovative Research) containing dexamethasone (5 mg pellet, 0.79 mg · kg-1 · d-1) or were sham-operated (controls). Rats were killed 12 hours (12hr-DEX), 4 days (4d-DEX), or 15 days (15d-DEX) after dexamethasone implantation to examine the onset, develop, and maintenance of hypertension, respectively.
Organ Chamber Experiments
On the day of experiments, rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg IP). The thoracic aorta was excised and immediately placed in cold physiological salt solution (PSS; composition in mmol/L: NaCl 130.0, KCl 4.7, KH2PO4 1.18, MgSO4-7H2O 1.17, NaHCO3 14.9, dextrose 5.5, EDTA 0.26, CaCl2 1.6). The isolated endothelium-intact aortic segment was cleaned of connective tissue and cut into rings (3 to 4 mm). The aortic rings were then connected to an isometric force transducer in a 50-mL organ chamber filled with 37°C PSS and bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2. Aortic rings from dexamethasone-treated and control rats were studied in parallel. All experiments were performed in the presence of indomethacin (10-5 mol/L) to inhibit cyclooxygenase. Vessels were set at a passive force of 3.5 to 4.0 g, and isometric force generation was recorded continuously. After a 60-minute equilibration period, all vessels were contracted with phenylephrine (PE, 10-7 mol/L) to test viability. Acetylcholine (ACH, 10-6 mol/L) was administered to test the functional integrity of endothelium as measured by relaxation. Concentration-response curves were obtained in a half-log, cumulative fashion. Responses to ACH and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were generated after preconstriction to PE (10-7 mol/L). Incubation time was 60 minutes for indomethacin and sepiapterin, and 20 minutes for N
-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA). Relaxation responses to ACH and SNP were expressed as percentage of relaxation from submaximal PE-induced constriction (10-7 mol/L). To determine EC50 values for relaxation responses to SNP after NOS inhibition, data were expressed as a percentage of maximal relaxation. Regression analysis using 3 data points along the linear section of the concentration-response curve was used to generate an equation from which the EC50 value was determined. These values were then averaged, and the geometric mean was compared between groups.
Reverse TranscriptasePolymerase Chain Reaction
Thoracic aorta was removed and cleaned free of adherent fat, connective tissue, and blood before being snap frozen. RNA was extracted by using TRIZOL reagent following the manufacturers protocol (GIBCO). The RNA was quantified by spectrophotometry, and 1 µg of RNA was used to produce cDNA. Contaminating cDNA was removed by using DNAse enzyme before reverse transcription with AMV reverse transcriptase using oligo dT as a primer. Occasional RNA samples were subjected to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure without prior reverse transcription to control for the presence of contaminating genomic DNA in the sample. PCR amplifications were performed on a portion of the cDNA produced. Each PCR reaction contained 5 pmol/L of each oligonucleotide primer, 200 µmol/L dNTP, and 0.2 U TAQ in the manufacturers buffer. Optimum annealing temperature was assessed using a gradient block thermal cycler. Cycle number and template dilution factor were determined for each amplicon before experimentation to ensure linearity. The cDNA produced was resolved on a 2% agarose gel, and the amount of DNA present was identified by using ethidium bromide staining. The results were quantified by using KODAK 1D software and an EDAS 290 imaging system (Eastman Kodak). The specific oligonucleotide primers were designed by using an Internet-based primer design program, GeneFisher. Rat GTPCH1 (forward, 5'-ATTTGTGGGAAGGGTCCA-3'; reverse, 5'-CAGATAACG-CTGGCCTCA-3') and eNOS (forward, 5'-GACATTGAG-AGCAAAGGGCTGC-3'; reverse, 5'-CGGCTTGTCACCT-CCTGG-3') primers were obtained from Biosource.
Reagents
The following compounds were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.: ACH, indomethacin, L-NNA, PE, sepiapterin, and SNP. L-NNA and sepiapterin were dissolved in PSS, and a stock solution of indomethacin was dissolved in ethanol (<0.1% final concentration in organ chamber). All other drugs were dissolved in distilled water. All reagents were prepared fresh on the day of experiments.
Statistical Analyses
Results are presented as mean±SEM. ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test when necessary. The significance level was set at 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effect of Dexamethasone on Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation
Maximal relaxation to ACH was significantly decreased in the 4d-DEX and 15d-DEX rats compared with the 12hr-DEX and control rats (relaxation from PE-induced contraction 10-7 mol/L: controls, 90±2%; 12hr-DEX, 87±5%; 4d-DEX, 67±4%; 15d-DEX, 65±3%; P<0.05 for 4d-DEX and 15d-DEX versus controls) (Figure 2). This effect was dependent on the length of dexamethasone treatment. NOS inhibition by using L-NNA (10 -5 mol/L) significantly decreased maximal relaxation to ACH in all groups (Figure 2), except the 15d-DEX vessels, in which NOS inhibition slightly decreased maximal relaxation to ACH. Sepiapterin (10 -4 mol/L), a BH4 donor, restored maximal vasodilation responses to ACH in the 4d-DEX and 15d-DEX segments to that of controls (Figure 2). The dose-response curve and EC50 value for aortas from all groups after sepiapterin were similar to that of the control rats (data not shown).
|
Effect of Dexamethasone on Endothelium-Independent Vasodilation
Endothelium-independent dilation was examined by using SNP. Except for 1 data point, relaxations to SNP in aortic segments from all dexamethasone-treated rats were not statistically different compared with controls (Figure 3). However, NOS inhibition by L-NNA (10-5 mol/L) significantly increased the sensitivity to SNP in the vessels from all dexamethasone-treated rats compared with controls (Figure 4). The EC50 values (Figure 4) for the 12hr-DEX (-8.8951±0.0237; anti-log, 1.3x10-9), 4d-DEX (-8.8987±0.0593; anti-log, 1.3x10-9), and 15d-DEX (-8.9463±0.1611; anti-log, 1.1x10-9) rat aortas were significantly increased compared with the control vessels (-8.4838±0.0744; anti-log, 3.3x10-9) (P<0.05 for all).
|
|
Effect of Dexamethasone on mRNA Expression
GTPCH1 mRNA expression was significantly reduced in the 4d-DEX and 15d-DEX vessels compared with controls and 12hr-DEX vessels (intensity in arbitrary units: controls, 122.2±1.1; 12hr-DEX, 120.6±3.6; 4d-DEX, 113.6±2.5; 15d-DEX, 111.0±1.7; P<0.05) (Figure 5). Similarly, eNOS mRNA expression was significantly decreased in the 4d-DEX and 15d-DEX vessels compared with controls and 12-hour-DEX vessels (intensity in arbitrary units: controls, 118.1±1.8; 12hr-DEX, 111.8±3.4; 4d-DEX, 103.4±1.0; 15d-DEX, 98.4±1.0; P<0.05, data not shown). There were no significant differences in GTPCH1 and eNOS mRNA levels between the 12hr-DEX vessels and controls (P>0.05).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NO plays an important role in blood pressure regulation, and inhibition of NO production leads to elevated blood pressure, as demonstrated in rats given exogenous L-NNA and in eNOS knockout mice.16,17 Excess glucocorticoids are known to increase blood pressure in humans and animals, and systolic blood pressure rises rapidly on administration of high doses of synthetic glucocorticoids. In the present study, we found systolic blood pressures significantly increased after 12 hours in rats implanted with a dexamethasone pellet (Figure 1). Systolic pressures continued to rise significantly and were further elevated 4 and 15 days after dexamethasone implantation.
Previous studies have shown that endothelium-dependent relaxation to ACH is decreased in humans and rats with glucocorticoid hypertension.1,4,5 Our data support these findings, and we further elucidated that this decrease in ACH-induced vasodilation was time-dependent (Figure 2). Although the 12hr-DEX vessel relaxation responses were not significantly different compared with that of controls, the 4d-DEX and 15d-DEX had significantly reduced vasodilation. These data suggest that a further reduction of vasodilation, most likely from the decreased bioavailability of NO, contributes to the development and maintenance of elevated systolic blood pressure in glucocorticoid hypertensive rats, but not the onset. The increased blood pressure seen after 12 hours of dexamethasone without a subsequent reduction in vasodilation may be owing to a potentiation of vasoconstriction by angiotensin II and norepinephrine, previously shown to occur after glucocorticoid administration.3,4 The thoracic aorta, of which changes in tone do not influence systemic resistance, was used in the current study as a model for vascular tissue to examine the mechanism of circulating glucocorticoids and the effects on vascular reactivity and gene expression. NOS inhibition by using L-NNA (10-5 mol/L) abolished ACH-induced vasodilation in all groups except the 15d-DEX vessels, which showed a slightly reduced vasodilation to ACH (Figure 2). This would imply that decreased NO bioavailability and NO-mediated vasodilation by glucocorticoids may upregulate other mediators of vasodilation such as endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). Evidence to support this comes from a previous study that showed increased EDHF-mediated relaxation and gene expression in porcine coronary arteries after 24-hour incubation with cortisol.18 Importantly, we can eliminate cyclooxygenase-derived products as the cause of this finding because indomethacin (10-5 mol/L) was used in all experiments. In addition, increased sensitivity to NO by downstream mediators of vasodilation may also explain this finding.
Inhibition of GTPCH1, the rate-limiting enzyme in the production of BH4, has been shown to decrease NO production and endothelium-dependent relaxation.19,20 In contrast, restoration of BH4 levels in humans and animals increases endothelium-dependent relaxation in a number of disease conditions.2123 Results from our study support these findings, as we showed that sepiapterin restored ACH-induced vasodilation in glucocorticoid hypertensive rats (Figure 2). Interestingly, we observed a small, but not significant, decrease in vasodilation in the control vessels after sepiapterin incubation for 60 minutes. BH4 has been reported to be susceptible to auto-oxidation, which may increase oxidant stress and decrease NO bioavailability, thus leading to reduced vasodilation. Katusic24 has suggested this mechanism as a caution in the use of exogenous BH4 in humans with normal endothelial function.
To examine the site of glucocorticoid-induced decreases in vasodilation, endothelium-independent experiments were performed. By using SNP, we found no differences in the concentration-response curves in the aortas from dexamethasone-treated rats compared with controls except for 1 unrelated data point (Figure 3). However, we did demonstrate an increased sensitivity to SNP after NOS inhibition (Figure 4). By depleting endogenous NO in dexamethasone-treated and control vessels, we saw a significant decrease in SNP EC50 values for aortas from dexamethasone-treated rats. These findings suggest that in the presence of low NO bioavailability, downstream mediators of NO-induced vasodilation, such as guanylate cyclase and cyclic guanosine monophosphate, may become upregulated. Although endothelium-dependent relaxations in the 12hr-DEX vessels were not different compared with that of controls, we did observe a significant shift of the concentration-response curve to SNP after NOS inhibition. This may be explained by a rapid downregulation of eNOS after glucocorticoid treatment, despite sufficient levels of NO to mediate vasodilation. In addition, endothelium-dependent relaxations in the 12hr-DEX vessels may be mediated via hydrogen peroxide, a known vasodilator.
Glucocorticoids have been shown to alter various proteins in the NOS-mediated production of NO.6 To examine the genomic effect of glucocorticoids on GTPCH1 and eNOS, we performed mRNA expression studies. We have previously shown that GTPCH1 mRNA levels were significantly decreased (50% of controls) in aortic segments incubated with dexamethasone (1.3x10-6 mol/L) after 6 hours.5 However, it is not known at what period in the development of hypertension that the enzyme responsible for BH4 biosynthesis decreases. In the current study, we hypothesized there would be little to no change in GTPCH1 and eNOS mRNA expression in the vessels from 12hr-DEXtreated rats, but there would be a significant decrease of both enzymes in the 4d-DEX and 15d-DEX compared with controls. Indeed, we found a significant downregulation of GTPCH1 and eNOS in the latter 2 time-points, 4d-DEX and 15d-DEX (Figure 5). Because BH4 biosynthesis is tightly coupled with eNOS production, this supports the finding by Wallerath et al,15 who found a 40% decrease in eNOS mRNA in aortas from rats after 3 days of dexamethasone in the drinking water (0.3 mg · kg-1 · d-1). They found that although the eNOS promoter lacks a glucocorticoid response element, glucocorticoids can destabilize eNOS mRNA via prevention of the transcription factor GATA and reduced transcription of the eNOS gene. These data support previous findings that glucocorticoids can negatively affect gene expression of eNOS and GTPCH1, thus leading to reduced vasodilation and increased blood pressure. It is currently unknown if GTPCH1 contains a glucocorticoid response element. Of interest, there was a very strong correlation between GTPCH1 mRNA levels and blood pressure in the dexamethasone-treated rats (r=-0.94).
In conclusion, our evidence supports the hypothesis that downregulation of GTPCH1 expression decreased production of BH4 and NO and contributed to hypertension in rats treated with synthetic glucocorticoids. GTPCH1 appears to be downregulated early in the development of hypertension, and a sustained decrease of GTPCH1 expression by glucocorticoids may contribute to the decreased NO bioavailability and increased blood pressure in rats.
Perspectives
Based on the results of this study, prevention of GTPCH1 downregulation in humans and animals with excess glucocorticoids may maintain endothelial function and suppress the development of hypertension. Future research to examine the molecular mechanism of GTPCH1 downregulation by glucocorticoids may provide a target that would eliminate potential negative side effects of excess glucocorticoids such as depression and hypertension.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 19, 2002; first decision November 8, 2002; accepted November 27, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Okuno T, Suzuki H, Saruta T. Dexamethasone hypertension in rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1981; 3: 10751086.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Handa M, Kondo K, Suzuki H, Saruta T. Dexamethasone hypertension in rats: role of prostaglandins and pressor sensitivity to norepinephrine. Hypertension. 1984; 6: 236241.
4. Saruta T. Mechanism of glucocorticoid-induced hypertension. Hypertens Res. 1996; 19: 18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Johns DG, Dorrance AM, Tramontini NL, Webb RC. Glucocorticoids inhibit tetrahydrobiopterin-dependent endothelial function. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 2001; 226: 2731.
6. Whitworth JA, Schyvens CG, Zhang Y, Andrews MC, Mangos GJ, Kelly JJ. The nitric oxide system in glucocorticoid-induced hypertension. J Hypertens. 2002; 20: 10351043.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Gross SS, Jones CL, Hattori Y, Raman CS. Tetrahydrobiopterin: an essential cofactor of nitric oxide synthase with an elusive role. In: Nitric Oxide Biology and Pathobiology. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2000: 167187.
8. Nichol CA, Smith GK, Duch DS. Biosynthesis and metabolism of tetrahydrobiopterin and molybdopterin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985; 54: 729764.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Yoneyama T, Hatakeyama K. Ligand binding to the inhibitory and stimulatory GTP cyclohydrolase 1/GTP cyclohydrolase 1 feedback regulatory protein complexes. Protein Sci. 2001; 10: 871878.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Vasquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B, Martasek P, Hogg N, Masters BS, Karoui H, Tordo P, Pritchard KA Jr. Superoxide generation by endothelial nitric oxide synthase: the influence of cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 92209225.
11. Wever RMF, van Dam T, van Rijn HJM, de Groot PF, Rabelink TJ. Tetrahydrobiopterin regulates superoxide and nitric oxide generation by recombinant endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997; 237: 340344.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Xia Y, Tsai AL, Berka V, Zweier JL. Superoxide generation from endothelial nitric-oxide synthase: a calcium/calmodulin-dependent and tetrahydrobiopterin regulatory process. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 2580425808.
13. Maier W, Cosentino F, Lutolf RB, Fleisch M, Seiler C, Hess OM, Meier B, Luscher TF. Tetrahydrobiopterin improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000; 35: 173178.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Hong HJ, Hsiao G, Cheng TH, Yen MH. Supplementation with tetrahydrobiopterin suppresses the development of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 10441048.
15. Wallerath T, Witte K, Schafer SC, Schwarz PM, Prellwitz W, Wohlfart P, Kleinert H, Lehr HA, Lemmer B, Forstermann U. Down-regulation of the expression of endothelial NO synthase is likely to contribute to glucocorticoid-mediated hypertension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 1335713362.
16. Kanagy NL. Increased vascular responsiveness to
2-adrenergic stimulation during NOS inhibitioninduced hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: H2756H2764.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Shesely EG, Maeda N, Kim HS, Desai KM, Krege JH, Laubach VE, Sherman PA, Sessa WC, Smithies O. Elevated blood pressure in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 1317613181.
18. Bauersachs J, Christ M, Ertl G, Michaelis UR, Fisslthaler B, Busse R, Fleming I. Cytochrome P450 2C expression and EDHF-mediated relaxation in porcine coronary arteries is increased by cortisol. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 54: 669675.
19. Cosentino F, Katusic ZS. Tetrahydrobiopterin and dysfunction of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in coronary arteries. Circulation. 1995; 91: 139144.
20. Kinoshita H, Milstein S, Wambi C, Katusic ZS. Inhibition of tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis impairs endothelium-dependent relaxations in canine basilar artery. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: H718H724.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Stroes E, Kastelein J, Cosentino F, Erkelens W, Wever R, Koomans H, Luscher T, Rabelink T. Tetrahydrobiopterin restores endothelial function in hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 4146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Tiefenbacher CP, Bleeke T, Vahl C, Amann K, Vogt A, Kubler W. Endothelial dysfunction of coronary resistance arteries is improved by tetrahydrobiopterin in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2000; 102: 21722179.
23. Ueda S, Matsouka H, Miyazaki H, Usui M, Okuda S, Imaizumi T. Tetrahydrobiopterin restores endothelial function in long-term smokers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 7175.
24. Katusic ZS. Vascular endothelial dysfunction: does tetrahydrobiopterin play a role? Am J Physiol. 2001; 281: H981H986.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Dorrance, D. M. Pollock, O. P. Romanko, and D. W. Stepp A high-potassium diet reduces infarct size and improves vascular structure in hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): R415 - R422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hizume, K. Morikawa, A. Takaki, K. Abe, K. Sunagawa, M. Amano, K. Kaibuchi, C. Kubo, and H. Shimokawa Sustained Elevation of Serum Cortisol Level Causes Sensitization of Coronary Vasoconstricting Responses in Pigs In Vivo: A Possible Link Between Stress and Coronary Vasospasm Circ. Res., September 29, 2006; 99(7): 767 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhang, T. W. Hein, W. Wang, M. W. Miller, T. W. Fossum, M. M. McDonald, J. D. Humphrey, and L. Kuo Upregulation of Vascular Arginase in Hypertension Decreases Nitric Oxide-Mediated Dilation of Coronary Arterioles Hypertension, December 1, 2004; 44(6): 935 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Alp and K. M. Channon Regulation of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase by Tetrahydrobiopterin in Vascular Disease Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2004; 24(3): 413 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |