Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2003;42:507-514
Published online before print September 8, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000092000.07559.57
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/4/507    most recent
01.HYP.0000092000.07559.57v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, T. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies

(Hypertension. 2003;42:507.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Physiological Impact of Increased Expression of the AT1 Angiotensin Receptor

Thu H. Le; Hyung-Suk Kim; Andrew M. Allen; Robert F. Spurney; Oliver Smithies; Thomas M. Coffman

From the Department of Medicine, Duke University and Durham VA Medical Centers (T.H.L., R.F.S., T.M.C.), Durham, NC; the Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina (H.-S.K., O.S.), Chapel Hill, NC; and The Howard Florey Institute, University of Melbourne (A.M.A.), Australia.

Correspondence to Thomas Coffman, MD, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University and Durham VA Medical Centers, 508 Fulton St, Bldg 6, Room 1100, Durham, NC 27705. E-mail tcoffman{at}duke.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
To test the effect of increased AT1 receptor expression on blood pressure, we used gene targeting to generate mouse lines with a tandem duplication of the AT1A receptor gene locus (Agtr1a) along with >10 kb of 5' flanking DNA. By successive breeding, we generated mice with 3 and 4 copies of the Agtr1a gene locus on an inbred 129/Sv background. AT1A mRNA expression and AT1-specific binding of 125I-angiotensin II were increased in proportion to Agtr1a gene copy number. These animals survived in expected numbers, and their body, heart, and kidney weights were similar to wild-type, 2-copy control mice. Pressor responses to angiotensin II were blunted in the 4-copy mice compared with control mice. In male mice, there was no correlation between resting blood pressure and Agtr1a gene copy number or AT1A mRNA levels. However, in female mice, there was a highly significant positive correlation between blood pressure and AT1A receptor expression, paralleled by significant increases in aldosterone synthase expression with increase in gene copy number. Furthermore, in female but not male mice, there was a positive correlation between kallikrein and AT1A receptor mRNA levels and an inverse correlation between renin mRNA and Agtr1a copy number. Thus, in female but not male mice, genetic variants that increase expression of AT1 receptors affect blood pressure and gene expression programs. The impact of enhanced AT1 receptor expression on blood pressure may be blunted by systemic compensatory responses and altered signal-effector coupling in the vasculature.


Key Words: hypertension, renal • renin • aldosterone • mice • gender


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a critical role in the regulation of blood pressure and sodium homeostasis.1 Enhanced activity of the RAS causes hypertension and end-organ injury.2–4 Variations in genes encoding components of the RAS have been associated with hypertension in human populations. For example, the M235T variant of the gene encoding angiotensinogen, the protein precursor of angiotensin II, has been associated with elevated plasma angiotensinogen levels and essential hypertension in white American and French populations.5 This allele is in linkage disequilibrium with a single nucleotide substitution in the promoter region of the angiotensinogen gene that appears to enhance transcriptional efficiency.6 Direct proof of a causal relation between Agt genotypes and blood pressures has been established by using genetically engineered mouse models.7

The major physiological actions of the RAS are mediated through the type 1 (AT1) receptor, and clinical studies have demonstrated that pharmacological blockade of the AT1 receptor effectively lowers blood pressure and protects against end-organ damage.8 Rodents have two AT1 receptor isoforms, AT1A and AT1B, which are encoded by distinct genes. In most tissues, expression of the AT1A receptor far exceeds that of the AT1B receptor, and the AT1A receptor is considered to be the murine homologue of the human AT1 receptor. In previous studies, we found that incremental reductions in AT1A receptor gene expression implemented through gene targeting caused a proportional lowering of resting blood pressure. For example, in heterozygous Agtr1a± mice, a 50% reduction in AT1A receptor expression lowers systolic blood pressure by 12 mm Hg compared with control mice; the complete absence of AT1A receptors in Agtr1a-/- mice is associated with a further lowering of blood pressure.9 This demonstration that reduced levels of AT1A receptor gene expression affect blood pressure suggests that naturally occurring variants of the Agtr1a gene locus that increase the level of receptor expression could positively affect resting blood pressure.

To determine whether increased levels of AT1A receptor expression would increase blood pressure, we generated mice with a targeted duplication of the Agtr1a gene locus and examined the physiological effects of the resulting quantitative variation of the AT1A receptor gene expression. Using this model, we found that the impact of increased AT1 receptor expression on blood pressure is complex and that these effects are modified by gender and by vascular compensations.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Gene Targeting Vector
Mice with a tandem duplication of the Agtr1a gene locus at its normal chromosomal location were generated with the use of gap-repair gene targeting strategy described previously.7 The targeting vector (Figure 1B) contains all of the known regulatory sequences in the Agtr1a promoter.10,11 ES cells of the E14TG2a line were transfected with the linearized targeting vector by electroporation, and selection was carried out with G418 and ganciclovir as described.12,13 Potential recombinants were screened by a PCR recombinant fragment assay using the primers a (CCTGGAAGCTT- TCACTACCT-3') and b (GTATGCTATACGAAGTTATGGC-3') (Figure 1). Targeting was confirmed by Southern blot analysis (Figure 1C).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Duplication of Agtr1a gene by a gap-repair gene targeting. Agtr1a gene was cloned from a BAC genomic library made by strain 129 mouse DNA. A, Map of the endogenous Agtr1a locus with three exons of the gene shown as numbered white rectangles (5' untranslational region) and black rectangle under the lines. Targeting vector used to duplicate the Agtr1a gene locus depicted in B is an O-type (insertional) targeting construct with a 10-kb 5' homology region containing exon 1 along with {approx}8 kb 5' upstream sequence, which includes all of the known regulatory sequences in the Agtr1a gene promoter. A 90-kb gap in the targeting construct relative to the targeted Agtr1a gene spans exons 2 and 3. A neomycin-resistance (neo) gene and herpes simplex thymidine kinase (TK) gene were used for positive and negative selection, respectively. Interrupted line represents no real length. Targeted locus after duplication of the Agtr1a gene is shown in C. Two horizontal square brackets indicate the duplicated region. Arrows 1 and 2 are primers for PCR (also indicated in A and B). Genomic DNA fragments that should hybridize to exon 3–specific probe after successful gap-repair targeting are indicated by double-headed horizontal arrows; their predicted sizes are given in kilobases. Restriction enzymes used are X (Xba I) and K (Kpn I). Enzyme sites in parentheses were destroyed in the targeting construct (B) and after recombination (C); enzyme site in the circle is from the BAC vector.

Correctly targeted ES cell lines were injected into B6 blastocysts to generate chimeras as described. Progeny heterozygous for the duplicated Agtr1a gene (2Agtr1a/+) were crossed to generate animals with three possible genotypes: (+/+), (2Agtr1a/+), and (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) with 2, 3, or 4 copies of the Agtr1a locus, respectively, on the inbred 129/sv background. All mice were bred and maintained in the AAALAC-accredited animal facility of the Durham VA Medical Center under NIH guidelines.

Ligand Binding Assays
The density of AT1 receptors in the kidney was determined by quantitative in vitro autoradiography as described previously.14 Twenty-micrometer kidney sections were incubated with 125I-[Sar1 Ile8] angiotensin II in the presence of the selective AT1 antagonist candesartan (1 µmol/L, Astra Hässle) or the AT2 antagonist PD123319 (10 µmol/L, Parke-Davis). The sections were then exposed to x-ray film (UM-MA HC medical x-ray film, Fuji Co). Radioactivity standards were exposed simultaneously, which then allowed the optical densities of the radiographic images to be converted into radioactivity levels (disintegrations per minute, dpm), using a computerized imaging system (MCID Imaging Research).

[3H]Angiotensin II Binding Studies
Kidneys from 2-copy or 3-copy mice (n=6) were removed and placed in ice-cold x1 Dulbecco’s PBS buffer. Mouse glomeruli were isolated as described in detail previously.15 Equilibrium binding data were analyzed by Scatchard method to estimate Bmax and equilibrium Kd by fitting the data to a nonlinear model with the use of the ENZFITTER computer program (Elsevier-Biosoft).

Angiotensin II Infusions
We measured acute pressor response to 0.1, 1, and 10 µg/kg angiotensin II in (+/+), (2Agtr1a/+) and (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) animals as described.9 To inhibit endogenous angiotensin II production, ACE inhibitor enalapril (30 mg/kg per day orally) was administered for 2 days before study, and an additional 10 mg/kg IV was given at the start of the study.

Measurements of Resting Blood Pressure
Systolic blood pressures were measured in conscious mice with the use of a computerized tail-cuff system (Visitech Systems) that has been validated and described previously.16

Quantification of mRNA Expression by Real-Time RT-PCR
Relative levels of mRNA for renin, the AT1A receptor, aldosterone synthase, and kallikrein were determined by real-time RT-PCR with the ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System as described, and the nucleotide sequences of the PCR primers and their fluorogenic probes have been published previously.17

Data Analysis
For comparisons between groups, statistical significance was assessed by nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Linear regression analysis was used to correlate the relation between response variable and single predictor variable (Minitab Statistical Software).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Normal Survival of Mice With 3 or 4 Copies of the Agtr1a Gene Locus
We assessed survival and general characteristics at weaning of 156 consecutive progeny from matings of 3-copy (2Agtr1a/+)x3-copy (2Agtr1a/+) animals. The proportions of surviving 2- (+/+), 3- (2Agtr1a/+), and 4-copy (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) mice were 20.5%, 53.8%, and 25.6%, respectively. This distribution did not differ significantly from predicted (25%/50%/25%). Thus, an increased number of Agtr1a gene copies does not affect survival. Furthermore, growth, vigor, and fertility of 3- and 4-copy mice were indistinguishable from their (+/+) littermates.

AT1A Receptor mRNA Levels and Agtr1a Genotype
To assess AT1A receptor mRNA expression, we isolated RNA from kidney tissues of male and female mice of all three genotypes and measured AT1A mRNA levels by real-time PCR.17 As shown in Figure 2, there was a stepwise increase in AT1A receptor mRNA expression with increasing Agtr1a gene copy number. AT1A receptor mRNA levels were significantly higher in 3-copy (2Agtr1a/+) mice (10.8±0.3 pg/µg total RNA) than in the 2-copy (+/+) mice (9.3±0.3 pg/µg total RNA; P<0.002), and there was a further increase in AT1A mRNA levels in the 4-copy (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) mice (12.3±0.4 pg/µg total RNA; P<0.007 versus the 3-copy (2Agtr1a/+) group). By linear regression analysis (not shown), there was a significant positive correlation between AT1A receptor mRNA levels correlated and the number of Agtr1a genes (R2=0.313; P<0.0005). When expressed as percentages of the mean AT1A receptor mRNA level, assigning a value of 100% to the 2-copy (+/+) animals, the AT1A mRNA expression in the 3-copy animals is {approx}116% of normal and {approx}133% in the 4-copy animals. As shown in the Table, the patterns of AT1A receptor mRNA expression in kidney did not differ significantly in females and males.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of Agtr1a gene copy number on AT1A mRNA expression. AT1A mRNA levels were obtained from kidneys of 2-copy (n=25), 3-copy (n=26), and 4-copy mice (n=26). Mean is indicated by solid black circle •. Median is indicated by horizontal line. Whiskers (vertical lines) extend to highest and lowest values. {dagger}P<0.006 vs 2-copy mice, *P<0.007 vs 3-copy mice.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
AT1A mRNA Expression According to Agtr1a Genotype and Gender

Ligand Binding Assays
To determine whether the Agtr1a gene duplication increases angiotensin binding sites, we compared 125I-angiotensin II binding in tissues from 2-(+/+), 3-(2Agtr1a/+), and 4-copy (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) mice. As shown in Figure 3, there was a general increase in 125I-[Sar1,Ile8] Ang II binding with increasing Agtr1a gene copies. To quantify and compare the levels of AT1-specific binding between the groups, glomerular binding densities were measured as disintegrations per minute (dpm)/mm2 (Figure 3b). This analysis was facilitated by the high levels of discrete binding in glomeruli. Similar to the patterns of AT1A mRNA expression, 125I-Ang II glomerular binding densities were significantly higher in the 3-copy (2Agtr1a/+) mice (870±27 dpm/mm2) than in 2-copy (+/+) animals (764±15 dpm/mm2; P=0.009) and were further increased in the 4-copy (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) mice (1056±38 dpm/mm2; P<0.006 versus the 3-copy group). The proportional percent increases in glomerular binding densities, 112% for the 3-copy group and 140% for the 4-copy group, paralleled the increases in AT1A receptor mRNA levels that we observed. Similar patterns were observed for binding densities in nonglomerular regions of the renal cortex (data not shown).



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. a, Representative picture of 125I-[Sar1,Ile8] angiotensin II binding assays in kidney tissues. Kidney sections were from Agtr1a knockout (for negative control) (A) and 2-copy (B), 3-copy (C), and 4-copy (D) mice. b, Effect of Agtr1a gene copy number on angiotensin binding sites, measured by 125I-angiotensin II binding. Ligand binding density is expressed as disintegrations per minute (DPM)/mm2. Mean is indicated by solid black circle •. Median is indicated by horizontal line. Whiskers (vertical lines) extend to highest and lowest values. {dagger}P=0.009 vs 2-copy, *P<0.006 vs 3-copy.

The effects of increasing the number of Agtr1a gene copies was also assessed by Scatchard analysis performed in isolated preparations of renal glomeruli of radioligand binding experiments using [3H]Angiotensin II. As shown in Figure 4, Bmax was significantly increased in glomeruli from 3-copy (2Agtr1a/+) versus 2-copy (+/+) mice (786 versus 637 fmol/mg protein). Despite the increase in binding sites, the Kd of AT1-specific binding was virtually identical in the two groups (7.9 versus 8.0 nmol). The Bmax and Kd values obtained in the present studies were similar to our previous findings in mouse glomeruli.15 This indicates that while the gene duplication increases levels of receptor expression, it does not affect binding affinities for angiotensin II.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Representative Scatchard plots of specific glomerular [3H]angiotensin II binding data. Mice were 12 weeks of age. {diamondsuit}, Two-copy mice; •, 3-copy mice. Data points are means of triplicate measurements for a typical experiment using both kidneys from 6 mice in each group. Lines for both groups of mice have virtually identical slopes. Resulting Bmax and Kd were 637 fmol/mg protein and 8.0 nmol for 2-copy mice and 786 fmol/mg protein and 7.9 nmol for 3-copy mice.

Enhanced AT1A Receptor Expression and Vascular Responses to Angiotensin II
To determine whether increased levels of AT1A receptor expression affect angiotensin II–dependent physiological responses, we compared acute pressor responses to angiotensin II in 2- (+/+) and 4-copy (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) mice. As shown in Figure 5, infusion of 0.1 µg/kg angiotensin II in wild-type mice caused a brisk pressor response with a near maximal effect observed within 20 seconds that was sustained for >120 seconds. This effect was markedly attenuated in the 4-copy mice, with a slower onset of vasoconstriction that remained <50% of the wild-type response out to 120 seconds after Ang II administration (P=0.03). A diminished response to a 10-fold increased level of infusion (1 µg/kg Ang II) was also observed (data not shown) in the 4-copy (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) mice (P<0.04 versus +/+). However, at a 100-fold concentration of Ang II (10 µg/kg), the magnitude and duration of the pressor responses were similar in (+/+) and (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a) animals.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of intravenous bolus of angiotensin II at 0.1 µg/kg on blood pressure in anesthetized mice. Changes in systolic blood pressure at various time intervals after angiotensin II infusion are depicted for 2-copy {square} (n=6, 3 male, 3 female) and 4-copy {blacksquare} mice (n=5, 4 male, 1 female). Mean is indicated by solid circle. Median is indicated by horizontal line. Whiskers (vertical lines) extend to highest and lowest values. {dagger}P<0.002, {ddagger}P=0.004, *P=0.03 vs 2-copy.

AT1A Receptor mRNA Expression in the Vasculature and Heart
Because pressor responses to low-dose Ang II infusion were attenuated in the 4-copy mice compared with wild-type, we next examined AT1A receptor mRNA levels in the left ventricle and aorta to determine whether there was any downregulation in receptor expression in vascular tissues that could account for the attenuated pressor response. In the 4-copy mice, AT1A receptor expression levels in the aorta of 4-copy animals were twice as high as in the 2-copy animals (1.03±0.19 pg/µg total RNA versus 0.50±0.07 pg/µg total RNA, P<0.02). Similarly, in the left ventricle, AT1A receptor mRNA levels were more than twice that of 2-copy animals (60.0±6.5 pg/µg total RNA versus 26.3±3.7 pg/µg total RNA, P=0.003). In the 4-copy animals, the augmentation of AT1A mRNA levels in the heart and vasculature (>200% of control levels) was significantly greater than in the kidney ({approx}133%).

Blood Pressure and Agtr1a Genotype
To determine the effects of increased AT1A receptor expression on resting blood pressure, we compared the systolic blood pressures of 2- (+/+), 3- (2Agtr1a/+), and 4-copy mice (2Agtr1a/2Agtr1a). Because of known gender differences in the regulation of components of the renin-angiotensin system and in the epidemiology of hypertension, we also examined correlations between blood pressure and Agtr1a genotypes in the entire cohort and separately in male and female mice. In addition, because there were a range of AT1A mRNA expression levels among individual animals within the same genotype, we also examined correlations between blood pressure and individual AT1A mRNA levels. In the combined group, there was a general correlation between the mean level of blood pressure and gene copy number (102±2, 104±2, and 106±2 mm Hg for 2-, 3-, and 4-copy mice, respectively), but these differences were not statistically significant. When blood pressure was compared in the male mice, there was no apparent association between the mean blood pressure and Agtr1a gene copy number (107±4 [n=12] versus 104±2 [n=19] versus 107±4 [n=13] mm Hg for 2-, 3-, and 4-copy mice, respectively) and no significant correlation between individual values of blood pressure and genotype or AT1A mRNA levels (data not shown). In contrast, blood pressure differences between genotypes were significantly correlated in female mice (99±2 [n=19], 104±3 [n=15], and 105±3 mm Hg [n=13] for 2-, 3-, and 4-copy mice, respectively; P=0.03 for 2-copy versus 3- and P=0.02 for 2-copy versus 4- copy; Figure 6a). Moreover, as shown in Figure 6b, there was a highly significant positive correlation between blood pressure and AT1A receptor expression (P=0.003) in the female animals.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. a, Effect of Agtr1a gene copy number on resting blood pressure in female mice. Systolic blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff; {dagger}P=0.03 vs 2-copy, *P=0.02 vs 2-copy. b, Correlation between systolic blood pressure and AT1A mRNA levels in female mice. AT1A mRNA was isolated from kidney tissues. Correlation measured by linear regression analysis (R2=0.39, P=0.003).

Effects of Agtr1a Genotype on Gene Expression Programs
To determine whether changes in Agtr1a gene copy number would lead to changes in the expression of other genes related to blood pressure regulation, we examined correlations between genotype, AT1A mRNA levels, and mRNA levels for three representative genes that are involved in blood pressure homeostasis: aldosterone synthase, renin, and kallikrein. We chose to specifically examine these three genes because of our previous observations of significant gender effects and interactions between their expressions and angiotensinogen genotype in mice.17 In male animals, we found no correlation between Agtr1a copy number or AT1A receptor mRNA level and mRNA levels of aldosterone synthase, renin, or kallikrein. In contrast, in female animals (Figure 7a), there were significant stepwise increases in aldosterone synthase mRNA expression with increase in Agtr1a gene copy number (571±71 [n=8], 592±34 [n=5], and 760±23 pg/µg total mRNA [n=7] for the 2-, 3-, and 4-copy groups, respectively, P<0.04 for 2- versus 4-copy), and there were significant stepwise reductions in renin mRNA levels between the Agtr1a genotypes (27±3 [n=8], 25±3 [n=5], and 18±2 [n=7] pg/µg total mRNA for the 2-, 3-, and 4-copy groups, respectively; P=0.006 for 2- versus 4-copy and P<0.04 for 3- versus 4-copy; Figure 7b). Moreover, in female mice, there was a highly significant correlation between kallikrein mRNA levels and AT1A receptor mRNA levels (R=0.504; P=0.001; Figure 7c).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. a, Effect of Agtr1a genotype on aldosterone synthase mRNA expression in female mice (*P<0.04 vs 2-copy). b, Effect of Agtr1a genotype on kidney renin mRNA expression in female mice ({dagger}P=0.006 vs 2-copy, *P<0.04 vs 3-copy). c, Correlation between kallikrein mRNA and AT1A mRNA expression in female mice. Correlation measured by linear regression analysis (R=0.504, P=0.001).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
To understand the possible physiological consequences of genetic variants that increase AT1 receptor expression, we generated mouse lines with 3 and 4 copies of the Agtr1a gene locus on an inbred genetic background. In these animals, AT1A gene expression is under the control of the natural Agtr1a promoter. However, the consequences of increasing Agtr1a gene copies on AT1A mRNA expression varied in different tissues. In the vasculature and the heart, increasing the number of Agtr1a gene copies from 2 to 4 caused a proportional doubling of AT1A mRNA expression levels to 200% of control levels. In contrast, AT1A mRNA expression in kidneys of 4-copy mice was only 133% of wild-type. This suggests that transcriptional regulation of the Agtr1a gene is complex and varies significantly between tissues. In view of our previous studies in mice showing that duplication of the angiotensinogen (Agt) locus causes elevations in blood pressure,7 we anticipated that increasing expression of the AT1A receptor, the major murine AT1 receptor isoform, would likewise increase blood pressure. However, the magnitude of the blood pressure effect of the Agtr1a gene duplication was relatively modest, and blood pressure elevation could only be detected in female mice.

This finding that gender modifies the phenotype in these mouse lines is consistent with previously described gender differences in the incidence and character of hypertension.18–20 For example, the incidence of hypertension is lower in premenopausal women than age-matched men.21 In several animal models of hypertension, blood pressure elevation develops sooner and is more severe in male than female animals.22,23 Likewise, the impact of genetic variation in the renin-angiotensin system is also modified by gender. For example, in several human populations, the M235T polymorphism in the AGT gene is associated with hypertension and elevated circulating levels of angiotensinogen. Linkage of the 235T allele with high blood pressure was seen in male but not in female subjects.5 Similarly, increasing angiotensinogen levels in mice by increasing Agt gene copy caused a highly significant increase in blood pressure in male mice.17 In individual female mice, the increase in blood pressure was strongly correlated with their Agt expression in the liver, but the correlation between gene copy number and blood pressure failed to reach significance.17 Thus, at least for variants in the angiotensinogen gene, the influence of gender on blood pressure is very similar in humans and mice. In the present study, we found clear evidence of sexual dimorphism in our mutant animals with increased AT1A receptor expression. However, unlike variants of the angiotensinogen gene, the effect on blood pressure of increasing expression of AT1A receptors was only seen in female mice. This sexual dimorphism is not due to differences in the levels of AT1A mRNA expression per se. Thus, although gender effects on RAS gene functions are pervasive, these influences are complex and may vary dramatically between different RAS genes.

A major objective of our study was to model the capacity for increased AT1-receptor expression to affect blood pressure. Polymorphisms of the human AT1 receptor gene (AGTR1) have been identified and one variant, A1166C, has been associated with hypertension,24 changes in aortic distensibility,25 and increased left ventricular mass.26 Careful hemodynamic studies in nonhypertensive individuals have suggested that this polymorphism may affect baseline renal function and physiological responses to angiotensin II.27 The A1166C nucleotide substitution is located outside the coding region within the 3' untranslated region of the AT1 receptor mRNA, and it is not clear how this substitution could affect AT1 receptor expression or function, unless it alters mRNA stability or is in linkage disequilibrium with other mutations in the AGTR1 gene. To date, no alterations in levels of AT1 receptor expression have yet been documented between individuals with the different AGTR1 alleles, with the caveat that changes in AT1 receptor expression would be difficult to measure in humans because of the relative inaccessibility of structures with high levels of expression such as glomeruli. Nonetheless, our studies would predict that the consequences of any mutations that modestly increase AT1 receptor expression will be affected by gender.

It is noteworthy that the magnitude of the impact of alterations of AT1A receptor expression on blood pressure changes varies markedly, depending on whether expression is increased or decreased. We previously demonstrated that incremental reductions in AT1A receptor levels caused relatively large reductions in blood pressure that were proportional to the gene copy number.9 By contrast, in the current study, increasing AT1A receptor levels up to 2-fold had only a modest effect on blood pressure that was gender-dependent. These findings suggest that the capacity to compensate for reduced expression of AT1 receptors is limited, whereas the capacity to compensate for enhanced AT1 receptor levels is more robust, perhaps because of the pathological consequences of increasing AT1 receptor activity.

Two previous studies found that transgenic mice with enhanced expression of AT1 receptors in cardiac myocytes have massive cardiac enlargement, congestive heart failure, and early death.28,29 This is in obvious contrast to the relatively benign phenotype of our animals with enhanced AT1-receptor expression from duplication of the Agtr1a locus. However, there are fundamental differences in the studies that probably explain the different phenotypes. In our experiments, the increase in expression of the AT1 receptors was modest and was under the control of the natural regulatory elements present in the Agtr1a gene. By contrast, the cardiac-specific expression of AT1 receptors was generated in the transgenics by using the heterologous {alpha}-MHC promoter, and the level of expression was very high. It is likely that aberrant levels, pattern, and dynamics of AT1 expression are responsible for their dramatic phenotype. Differences in the genetic backgrounds of the mice may also account the different outcomes of these experiments.

Along with its effects on blood pressure, duplication of the Agtr1a gene significantly affected expression of other genes that regulate cardiovascular functions. As with blood pressure, the effects on gene expression differed between male and female mice. In female mice, increasing Agtr1a gene copies caused a series of apparently interrelated changes in gene expression that probably affected blood pressure regulation. Previous studies have demonstrated that AT1-receptor activation in adrenal glomerulosa cells stimulates expression of aldosterone synthase.30,31 Accordingly, increasing the number of AT1A receptors in female mice was sufficient to enhance expression of aldosterone synthase mRNA, and this may have contributed directly to blood pressure elevation. In contrast, expression of aldosterone synthase was not affected in male mice with increased Agtr1a gene copies, paralleling the lack of a blood pressure effect. In the female 3-and 4-copy mice, the elevation in blood pressure may have triggered a compensatory inhibition of renin mRNA expression, attenuating the degree of blood pressure increase. Kallikrein expression was also enhanced in the female mice, and this change may also blunt the rise in blood pressure. In the male mice, there were no alterations in renin and kallikrein expression, indicating that increased blood pressure may have been the trigger for these compensatory responses. Because the level of blood pressure seen in the 3- and 4-copy female mice was not different from wild-type males, the blood pressure threshold required to affect these gene expression programs may differ between male and female mice. The gender-related differences in gene expression observed in the present study and our previous study17 are consistent with conserved patterns of response to genetic variants within the RAS.

We also found evidence for vascular compensations that would tend to countermand the effects of the Agtr1a gene duplication on blood pressure. In the 4-copy mice, vasoconstrictor responses after infusion of relatively low concentrations of angiotensin II were blunted substantially, but at higher concentrations, the effects of these compensations were overcome. Thus, there appear to be natural mechanisms that oppose or ameliorate the potentially maladaptive consequences of exaggerated AT1 receptor expression in vasculature. These compensatory mechanisms were overcome by high-dose angiotensin II. The nature of these inhibitory mechanisms is not clear. Since AT1-specific binding is increased in proportion to Agtr1a gene copy number without any change in ligand affinities, it is likely that alterations in signaling or signal-effector coupling explain the impaired vascular responses in the 4-copy mice. This may occur through changes in the stoichiometrics of receptor interactions with downstream signaling molecules such as G proteins or in receptor-receptor interactions. The formation of AT1-receptor homodimers or heterodimers with other GPCRs may modulate activation and receptor signaling.32,33 Further understanding and characterization of these pathways that negatively modulate AT1-receptor signaling will have obvious applications to therapeutics and to understanding disease pathogenesis.

Perspectives
We have generated a mouse model for testing the capacity of genetic variants that increase expression of AT1 receptors to cause hypertension. Our studies suggest that the impact of increased AGTR1 gene expression on blood pressure will be modified by gender, by vascular compensations, and by altered expression of other genes involved in cardiovascular regulation. Thus, even for a key component of the renin-angiotensin system, the potential for incremental changes in expression of a single gene to affect blood pressure is buffered by compensations at a number of levels. Moreover, these compensations are also subject to genetic regulation that may vary between male and female subjects. Accordingly, more profound changes in blood pressure may be expected when there are concomitant mutations in genes within compensatory pathways. This is consistent with current views suggesting a polygenic basis for human hypertension.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants GM20079, HL49277, and HL56122. We thank Edward Gilroy for advice on statistical analysis and Christopher Best and Kamie Snow for technical assistance.

Received January 27, 2003; first decision February 24, 2003; accepted August 12, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Peach M. Renin-angiotensin system: biochemistry and mechanisms of action. Physiol Rev. 1977; 57: 313–370.[Free Full Text]

2. Brandt JL, Gruhn JG. Effect of renin on proteinuria and PAH clearance at low plasma levels. Am J Physiol. 1948; 153: 458–464.[Free Full Text]

3. Bohrer MP, Deen WM, Roberson CR, Brenner BM. Mechanism of angiotensin II-induced proteinuria in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1977; 233: F13–F21.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Deodhar SD, Cuppage FE, Gableman E. Studies on the mechanism of experimental proteinuria induced by renin. J Exp Med. 1964; 120: 677–690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev YV, Lifton RP, Williams CS, Charru A, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Williams RR, Lalouel JM, Corvol P. Molecular basis of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Cell. 1992; 71: 169–180.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Inoue I, Nakajima T, Williams CS, Quackenbush J, Puryear R, Powers M, Cheng T, Ludwig EH, Sharma AM, Hata A, Jeunemaitre X, Lalouel JM. A nucleotide substitution in the promoter of human angiotensinogen is associated with essential hypertension and affects basal transcription in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 1786–1797.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Kim HS, Krege JH, Kluckman KD, Hagaman JR, Hodgin JB, Best CF, Jennette JC, Coffman TM, Maeda N, Smithies O. Genetic control of blood pressure and the angiotensinogen locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 2735–2739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S, RENAAL Study Investigators. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 861–869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Ito M, Oliverio MI, Mannon PJ, Best CF, Maeda N, Smithies O, Coffman TM. Regulation of blood pressure by the type 1A angiotensin II receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 3521–3525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Murasawa S, Matsubara H, Urakami M, Inada M. Regulatory elements that mediate expression of the gene for the angiotensin II type 1a receptor for the rat. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 26996–27003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Takeuchi K, Alexander RW, Nakamura Y, Tsujino T, Murphy TJ. Molecular structure and transcriptional function of the rat vascular AT1a angiotensin receptor gene. Circ Res. 1993; 73: 612–621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Boggs SS, Gregg RG, Borenstein N, Smithies O. Efficient transformation and frequent single-site, single-copy insertion of DNA can be obtained in mouse erythroleukemia cells transformed by electroporation. Exp Hematol. 1986; 14: 988–994.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Koller BH, Kim HS, Latour AM, Brigman K, Boucher RC Jr, Scambler P, Wainwright B, Smithies O. Toward an animal model of cystic fibrosis: targeted interruption of exon 10 of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene in embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88: 10730–10734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Song K, Allen AM, Paxinos G, Mendelsohn FA. Mapping of angiotensin II receptor subtype heterogeneity in rat brain. J Comp Neurol. 1992; 316: 467–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Spurney RF, Onorato JJ, Ruiz P, Pisetsky DS, Coffman TM. Characterization of glomerular thromboxane receptors in murine lupus nephritis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993; 264: 584–590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Krege J, Hodgin J, Hagaman J, Smithies O. A computerized system for measuring blood pressure in mice. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 1111–1115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Kim HS, Lee G, John SW, Maeda N, Smithies O. Molecular phenotyping for analyzing subtle genetic effects in mice: application to an angiotensinogen gene titration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 4602–4607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Gatzka CD, Kingwell BA, Cameron JD, Berry KL, Liang YL, Dewar EM, Reid CM, Jennings GL, Dart AM, ANBO2 Investigators. Australian Comparative Outcome Trial of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor- and Diuretic–Based Treatment of Hypertension in the Elderly. Gender differences in the timing of arterial wave reflection beyond differences in body height. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 2197–2203.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Fisher ND, Ferri C, Bellini C, Santucci A, Gleason R, Williams GH, Hollenberg NK, Seely EW. Age, gender, and non-modulation: a sexual dimorphism in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 980–985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Miller JA, Anacta LA, Cattran DC. Impact of gender on the renal response to angiotensin II. Kid Int. 1999; 55: 278–285.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Martins D, Nelson K, Pan D, Tareen N, Norris K. The effect of gender on age-related blood pressure changes and the prevalence of isolated systolic hypertension among older adults: data from NHANES III. J Gend Spec Med. 2001; 4: 10–13, 20.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Ouchi Y, Share L, Crofton JT, Iitake K, Brooks DP. Sex difference in the development of deoxycorticosterone-salt hypertension in the rat. Hypertension. 1987; 9: 172–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Dahl LK, Knudsen KD, Ohanian EV, Muirhead M, Tuthill R. Role of the gonads in hypertension-prone rats. J Exp Med. 1975; 142: 748–759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Bonnardeaux A, Davies E, Jeunemaitre X, Fery I, Charru A, Clauser E, Tiret L, Cambien F, Corvol P, Soubrier F. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphisms in human essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1994; 24: 63–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Benetos A, Gautier S, Ricard S, Topouchian J, Asmar R, Poirier O, Larosa E, Guize L, Safar M, Soubrier F, Cambien F. Influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphisms on aortic stiffness in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Circulation. 1996; 94: 698–703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Takami S, Katsuya T, Rakugi H, Sato N, Nakata Y, Kamitani A, Miki T, Higaki J, Ogihara T. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with increase of left ventricular mass but not with hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1998; 11: 316–321.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Miller JA, Thai K, Scholey JW. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism predicts response to losartan and angiotensin II. Kidney Int. 1999; 56: 2173–2180.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Hein L, Stevens ME, Barsh GS, Pratt RE, Kobilka BK, Dzau VJ. Overexpression of angiotensin AT1 receptor transgene in the mouse myocardium produces a lethal phenotype associated with myocyte hyperplasia and heart block. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 6391–6396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Paradis P, Dali-Youcef N, Paradis FW, Thibault G, Nemer M. Overexpression of angiotensin II type I receptor in cardiomyocytes induces cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 931–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Aguilera G. Role of angiotensin II receptor subtypes on the regulation of aldosterone secretion in the adrenal glomerulosa zone in the rat. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992; 90: 53–60.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Kakiki M, Morohashi K, Nomura M, Omura T, Horie T. Regulation of aldosterone synthase cytochrome P450 (CYP11B2) and 11 beta-hydroxylase cytochrome P450 (CYP11B1) expression in rat adrenal zona glomerulosa cells by low sodium diet and angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Biol Pharmacol Bull. 1997; 20: 962–968.

32. AbdAlla S, Lother H, Quitterer U. AT1-receptor heterodimers show enhanced G-protein activation and altered receptor sequestration. Nature. 2000; 407: 94–98.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Hebert TE, Bouvier M. Structural and functional aspects of G protein-coupled receptor oligomerization. Biochem Cell Biol. 1998; 76: 1–11.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Ramchandran, T. Takezako, Y. Saad, L. Stull, B. Fink, H. Yamada, S. Dikalov, D. G. Harrison, C. Moravec, and S. S. Karnik
Angiotensinergic stimulation of vascular endothelium in mice causes hypotension, bradycardia, and attenuated angiotensin response
PNAS, December 12, 2006; 103(50): 19087 - 19092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. P. Provoost
Does Angiotensin Receptor Recycling Regulate Blood Pressure?
Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 370 - 371.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
L. J. Mullins, M. A. Bailey, and J. J. Mullins
Hypertension, Kidney, and Transgenics: A Fresh Perspective
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2006; 86(2): 709 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Yoneda, H. Sanada, J. Yatabe, S. Midorikawa, S. Hashimoto, M. Sasaki, T. Katoh, T. Watanabe, P. M. Andrews, P. A. Jose, et al.
Differential Effects of Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antisense Oligonucleotides on Renal Function in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 58 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
P. Meneton, X. Jeunemaitre, H. E. de Wardener, and G. A. Macgregor
Links Between Dietary Salt Intake, Renal Salt Handling, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Diseases
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2005; 85(2): 679 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/4/507    most recent
01.HYP.0000092000.07559.57v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, T. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies