Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2003;42:901-908
Published online before print October 6, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000095615.83724.82
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/5/901    most recent
01.HYP.0000095615.83724.82v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kosachunhanun, N.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kosachunhanun, N.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow Other hypertension

(Hypertension. 2003;42:901.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Genetic Determinants of Nonmodulating Hypertension

Natapong Kosachunhanun; Steven C. Hunt; Paul N. Hopkins; Roger R. Williams{dagger}; Xavier Jeunemaitre; Pierre Corvol; Claudio Ferri; Richard M. Mortensen; Norman K. Hollenberg; Gordon H. Williams

From the Endocrine-Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School (N.K., R.M.M., G.H.W.), Boston, Mass; the Department of Medicine, University of Utah (S.C.H., P.N.H., R.R.W.), Salt Lake City; the Department of Medicine, Centre d’Investigation Clinique, Hopital Broussais and INSERM U College de France (X.J., P.C.), Paris; Department of Internal Medicine and Public Health, Università di L’Aquila (C.F.), L’Aquila, Italy; and the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School (N.K.H.), Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Gordon H. Williams, MD, Endocrine-Hypertension Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail gwilliams{at}partners.org


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We sought to determine whether genes of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system can predict the nonmodulating intermediate phenotype in essential hypertension. Aldosterone responses to angiotensin II were assessed in 298 subjects with hypertension. Subjects were genotyped at the angiotensinogen M235T, angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D, aldosterone synthase C-344 T, renin, angiotensin II type 1 receptor, and adducin loci. The data were analyzed by Student t test, ANOVA, stepwise linear regression and general linear model or GENMOD regression techniques, and {chi}2 analysis odds ratios (ORs). Aldosterone response varied by genotype for angiotensin and aldosterone synthase but not for the other loci. The combination of angiotensinogen 235 TT and angiotensin-converting enzyme DD showed further reduction (P=0.0377) when compared with angiotensinogen 235 TT alone, an example of genetic epistasis. When the subject was required also to possess the CYP11B2 -344 TT genotype, there was a further substantial reduction. Of these 3 loci, only angiotensinogen 235 TT significantly increased the OR of predicting the nonmodulating hypertensive phenotype (OR, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.152 to 3.51). However, when angiotensin-converting enzyme DD was combined with angiotensinogen 235 TT, the OR nearly doubled to 3.74, with a further increase to 5.36-fold when the subject possessed all 3 genotypes. Thus, the angiotensinogen, angiotensin-converting enzyme, and aldosterone synthase genotypes identified individuals with the nonmodulating phenotype with an increasing degree of fidelity. For this subclass of essential hypertension, it is likely that genotyping can be substituted for complex phenotyping for therapeutic and preventive decision making.


Key Words: hypertension, genetic • hypertension, nonmodulating • aldosterone • genetics • gene expression


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
For the past decade, intensive efforts have focused on identifying genes involved in the pathogenesis of human hypertension. However, these efforts, which have used classic linkage analysis, have been hampered by the complex regulation of arterial pressure, the presence of multiple "susceptibility" genes, and the multifactorial nature of hypertension. An alternative approach is based on the assumption that hypertension is not a disease but a syndrome. Thus, by subdividing the hypertensive population into more homogeneous genetic subgroups, intermediate phenotypes, there will be an increased probability that only a limited number of genes will be involved.1 Such an intermediate phenotype involves nonmodulation (NM) of adrenal and renal vascular responses to stimulation by angiotensin II (Ang II).2 As initially described nearly 20 years ago, these patients had 2 principal characteristics: a reduced renal blood flow response to Ang II infusion when studied during a period of high sodium intake and a reduced aldosterone (ALDO) response to Ang II infusion during low salt intake.3

In a study primarily comprising normotensive subjects, we have previously reported that a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the coding region (cSNP) of the angiotensinogen (AGT) gene is associated with a decreased renal blood flow response to Ang II, suggesting that this gene might be associated with NM hypertension.4 Recently, we extended this observation in 3 ways: (1) a similar but stronger association is present in subjects with hypertension; (2) the same relation exists between the AGT polymorphism and renal blood flow responsiveness in hypertensive subjects with a different SNP in the regulatory region of the gene; and (3) we documented that in the same subject, the polymorphism in this same SNP is also associated with decreased ALDO responsiveness to Ang II.5

Thus, we assumed that the genes of the renin-angiotensin-ALDO system could be potential candidates for genetic determinants of NM. We therefore assessed the role of polymorphism in several of these genes (renin, AGT, angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE], angiotensin receptor type 1 [AT1], and ALDO synthase [CYP11B2]) and as a control, the adducin gene, which is not associated with this pathway. We first assessed the effect of these genes on ALDO responses to Ang II as a quantitative trait. Then we determined the likelihood that genetic variants of genes that had a significant effect could identify the NM intermediate phenotype.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Subjects
Data obtained for this report came from subjects studied by the international HyperPath (Hypertension Pathotypes) group. Details of the protocol and study design used by this group have been reported previously.4–10 In brief, the group consists of investigators at several sites in the United States and Europe. They studied hypertensive and normotensive subjects on a precise protocol designed to control environmental factors so as to identify intermediate phenotypes for hypertension. The database used by these investigators is continually expanding. Some of the subjects are part of a sibling pair or triplet, whereas others are singletons. Although data from some of these patients have been used in other publications,4–10 analysis of the data reported herein has not been reported previously.

Data from 298 hypertensive subjects, 101 singletons and 197 individuals who belonged to 101 pedigrees, form the basis of this report. These subjects were selected from the data set because they had the following 4 items available for analysis: (1) plasma ALDO increment in response to a 3 ng · kg-1 · min-1 infusion of Ang II on a low-sodium diet, defined as a 24-hour sodium excretion of <30 mEq/d; (2) AGT M 235 T genotype; (3) ACE I/D genotype; and (4) CYP11B2 T-344 C genotype. Most also had renin intron 4, adducin G460W, and AT1 receptor A1116C genotypes. Patients were drawn from the following sites: Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston (n=120), the University of Utah in Salt Lake City (n=54), Hopital Broussais in Paris (n=102), and the University La Sapienza in Rome (n=22). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at each site, and informed, written consent was obtained from each subject. There were no site-associated effects related to the studies reported herein.

Protocol
In most subjects, antihypertensive therapy was discontinued between 2 and 4 weeks before the study began. When the patient had been taking an ACE inhibitor, it was discontinued 3 months before the study. When antihypertensive therapy was needed in the ensuing 2 to 2.5 months, an antihypertensive, non-ACE inhibitor drug was administered. Each subject was admitted to a Clinical Research Center and placed on a constant isocaloric diet containing 10 mmol sodium, 100 mmol potassium, 800 mg calcium, and 2000 to 2500 mL fluid. Some subjects began their low-salt diet as outpatients. Daily 24-hour urine collections were obtained for measurement of sodium, potassium, and creatinine to determine external balance. When 24-hour urine sodium excretion was <30 mmol/d (usually after 5 to 8 days), an upright-posture study and an Ang II infusion were usually performed on consecutive days. Studies began at 8 AM after the subjects had been fasting and recumbent overnight. For the upright-posture study, plasma renin activity (PRA) was obtained after the subject had been standing upright or walking quietly for 1.5 to 2 hours, as previously described.11

Ang II infusion was accomplished as follows. Each subject received an infusion of Ang II amide (Hypertensin, CIBA-Geigy) at 3 ng · kg-1 · min-1 for 40 minutes. The dose of 3 ng · kg-1 · min-1 has been previously shown to stimulate ALDO release with a minimal pressor effect.3,12,13 Blood samples for ALDO were obtained at baseline and after the Ang II infusion. Blood pressure was monitored every 2 minutes during the infusion with an indirect recording sphygmomanometer (Dinamap, Critikon).

Laboratory Procedures
Blood samples were drawn from an intravenous catheter located in the arm opposite the infused arm. Samples were placed on ice and immediately centrifuged. Serum or plasma and urine samples were stored at -20°C until assay. Serum and urine sodium and potassium levels were measured by flame photometry. PRA and ALDO levels were measured by radioimmunoassay techniques, as previously described.14,15 DNA was obtained from stored leukocytes. As previously described, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined by either polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction enzymes or PCR and allele-specific oligonucleotide probe techniques in the following genes: AGT at codon 235, CYP11B2 at -344, adducin at 460, renin at 387, and AT1 at 1116.7,9,16,17 An insertion-deletion (I/D) polymorphism at intron 16 of the ACE gene was determined by nested PCR, as described by Rigat et al.18

Phenotype Classification
Subjects were classified as low-renin hypertensive when their PRA response to upright posture was {els]2.4 ng · mL-1 · h-1.11 The non-low renin subjects were further classified as modulators or NMs based on their ALDO response to Ang II. An increment {els]15 ng/dL defined the NM phenotype.2

Statistics
The primary analysis used was the general linear model (GLM) procedure (SAS 6.12, SAS Institute) with statistical comparisons by least-squares means. The effect of sib pairs in the data set was assessed by the GENMOD procedure, also in the SAS statistical package. The reliability of the allele distribution for each gene was assessed with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test. For descriptions of subject characteristics, means and SD values were used for continuous variables, and counts and percentages were used for discrete variables. Normality was checked for each variable, and logarithmic transformation was used when appropriate, eg, PRA values. Clinical and study parameters between groups and subsets were assessed by 1-way ANOVA or Student t test for continuous variables and the {chi}2 test for categorical variables. These calculations were performed with the SPSS 9.0 statistical package. In some cases, the influence of genotype on ALDO response to Ang II was investigated by nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney U-Wilcoxon rank-sum test) because of the nonnormal distribution of the data. Finally, genotype and allele frequencies in subsets of hypertensive patients were assessed by {chi}2 analysis and logistic analysis, the latter with and without accounting for familial effects. Group means are presented with SE as the index of dispersion. The {alpha} for significance was 0.05 or less. To ensure the overall protection level, only probabilities associated with preplanned comparisons were used in the GLM procedure.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effect of Polymorphisms in Genes of the Renin-Angiotensin-ALDO System on ALDO Responses to Ang II
For polymorphisms in each of the 6 genes tested, the allele frequencies satisfied the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium law. Two genes that can modify Ang II production had contrasting effects on ALDO responses to infused Ang II. For the ACE gene, neither homozygotes for either allele nor heterozygotes differed in their responses (II, 23.5±2.1 ng/dL; ID, 22.1±1.6 ng/dL; and DD, 24.2±2.6 ng/dL). In contrast, among the AGT 235 genotypes, a significant difference was observed (MM, 24.2±2.1 ng/dL; MT, 22.8±1.2 ng/dL; and TT, 19.2±2.2 ng/dL; P=0.016, ANOVA; Figure 1, left). The effect of the CYP11B2 -344 genotype on response was also significant, but only marginally (CC, 23.8±2.2 ng/dL; CT, 23.6±1.5 ng/dL; and TT, 20.1±1.9 ng/dL; P=0.042). Polymorphisms in the renin, adducin, and AT1 genes had no effect on ALDO responses to Ang II and therefore, were not further assessed.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of AGT genotype on ALDO responses to Ang II infusion at 3 ng · kg-1 · min-1. Responses in subjects with the AGT 235 TT genotype were compared with those with either the MM or MT genotype. Shown are means and SEs. The number of subjects with each genotype is given in parentheses. Left, All 3 genotypes. Right, MM and MT responses combined.

Principally, the significant effect among AGT genotypes was driven by the homozygous TT. There were no differences in ALDO responses to Ang II in heterozygotes when compared with homozygotes for the M allele. Thus, in our modeling procedures, the MM+MT genotypes are contrasted with the TT AGT genotype. For consistency, the same approach was used for the other 2 genotypes: the combined ACE I/I+I/D response was contrasted with the ACE D/D response, and the combined CYP11B2 -344 CC+CT response was contrasted with the CYP11B2 TT response. With this approach, AGT 235 TT was associated with a significant (P=0.004) reduction in ALDO response to Ang II when compared with the rest of the hypertensive patients (Figure 1, right). In contrast, the ACE D/D genotype was not associated with such a change (P=0.775; Figure 2, left). CYP11B2 -344 TT subjects also had significantly (P=0.0275) reduced ALDO responses, although these were less than in subjects with AGT 235 TT (Figure 2, right).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of ACE and ALDO synthase (CYP11B2) genotypes on ALDO responses to Ang II infusion at 3 ng · kg-1 · min-1. Responses in hypertensives with the ACE DD genotype were compared with those with the II or ID genotype (left). ALDO responses in subjects with the CYP11B2 -344 TT genotype were compared with those with CT and CC genotypes (right). Shown are means and SEs. The number of subjects with each genotype is given in parentheses.

The data were then reanalyzed to determine the effect on ALDO responses to Ang II when 2 or more genotypes were combined. The combinations that produced significantly increased effects over the single genes were the AGT 235 TT plus ACE DD combination (Figure 3, middle) and the triple combination by adding CYP11B2 -344 TT to the other 2 (Figure 3, right).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of AGT TT genotype, alone and in combination with ACE DD and CYP11B2 -344 TT genotypes, on ALDO responses to Ang II at 3 ng · kg-1 · min-1. The left panel replicates the right panel of Figure 1. The middle panel presents the ALDO responses to Ang II in subjects with both AGT 235 TT and ACE DD in contrast to all other subjects. The right panel shows the effect of combining all 3 genotypes. Shown are means and SEs. The number of subjects with each genotype is given in parentheses.

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics by AGT Genotype
Because from the aforementioned analysis the AGT genotype greatly influenced ALDO responses to Ang II, we performed an assessment of the clinical characteristics of our population divided by AGT genotype (Table 1). There were no significant differences for any of the following parameters: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), serum potassium, urine sodium and potassium, basal serum ALDO, PRA, or diastolic blood pressure. The only statistically different parameter was a slightly higher systolic blood pressure in the AGT 235 TT group compared with the MM+MT group (P<0.031). Blood pressures in these 298 hypertensive subjects on a low-salt diet after hospitalization (135.0±1.0/82.4±0.6 mm Hg) were lower than at the screening visit (155.4±1.2/95.6±0.9 mm Hg), when many subjects were still taking their antihypertensive medications. However, they were still highly significantly different from blood pressures in 30 normotensive subjects studied on an identical protocol during the same time period (108.7±1.5/66.0±1.0 mm Hg; P=0.0001). Thus, the subjects enrolled in this study had, on average, a systolic blood pressure 28 mm Hg higher than normotensive subjects and a diastolic blood pressure 16 mm Hg higher.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical and Study Parameters of Subjects During Low-Salt Intake

Effect of Gender and Age on the Influence of Genotype on ALDO Responses to Ang II
Because we have previously shown that the adrenal response to Ang II was influenced by gender,19 the influence of age and gender on the effect of genotype on ALDO responses to Ang II was determined. To accomplish this, a GLM procedure was used that contained all 3 genotypes and gender as dichotomous variables and age as a continuous variable. Adding gender but not age substantially increased the predictability of the model (model F value=13.00, P<0.0001 with gender and 2.36, P=0.0234 without), thus enhancing the magnitude of the effect of AGT genotype on ALDO responses to Ang II (Table 2). It also improved the magnitude of CYP11B2’s effect on ALDO responses (from P=0.042 to P=0.0199) but had no effect on the ACE genotype influence on the response. On the basis of these findings, we then reanalyzed the data by gender. The relation between ALDO response to Ang II and AGT (P=0.0055) and CYP11B2 (P=0.0417) genotypes in men was similar to that in the entire data set. However, there was no relation between these parameters in women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. GLM Relating Gender and Genotype to ALDO Response to Ang II

Gene-Gene Interaction (Epistasis)
The potential of epistatic gene interaction was assessed by expanding the components in the GLM to include interactions between 3 genotypes, thereby producing 4 interacting terms. However, only the AGTxACE combination reached statistical significance. Therefore, the 3 other interacting terms were dropped, and the modified model was reanalyzed (Table 3). With the addition of the interaction term, there was still a significant effect of AGT 235 TT and CYP11B2 -344 TT and no appreciable effect of ACE DD on the change in ALDO responses to Ang II. In addition, those individuals who possessed both the AGT 235 TT and the ACE DD genotypes had a significant effect independent of that of the parent genotypes (P=0.0377). When the data for men only were analyzed, an even more significant effect was observed (P=0.0057). In women, there was no effect of combined genotype on response (P=0.73). CYP11B2 in combination with the other 2 genotypes did not add significantly to the GLM. However, by the "least-squares means for effect parameter" of the GLM, there was a significant difference in the ALDO increment in subjects who had the CYP11B2 -344 TT and AGT 235 TT genotypes versus the parent genotypes when gender was included in the model. Thus, compared with AGT 235 TT alone, the reduction in the ALDO increment was significantly less when AGT 235 TT and CYP11B2 -344 TT were both present (P=0.0471). Similarly, the combination produced a smaller increment than did CYP11B2 -344 TT alone (P=0.0202).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. GENMOD Procedure Assessing the Effect of Gender and Genotypes, Singly and in Combination on ALDO Responses to Ang II

Analysis of Singletons and Sibling Pairs
Our data consisted of individuals who were singletons and those who were part of a pedigree. The GLM treats the data from each subject as being independent and does not consider the "relatedness" of some of our subjects. This could influence our results. Thus, the data were reanalyzed with the GENMOD procedure, a statistical comparison that does considered sibships (Table 3). The comparison between the GLM and GENMOD analyses is in agreement with the conclusions of McGue et al.20 If anything, exclusion of a familial component to the data was the more not the less conservative way of analyzing the results.

Relations Between Gene Polymorphism and NM
Given the influence of genotype on ALDO responses to Ang II as a continuous variable, the data also were analyzed to determine the reliability of genotype to predict the NM hypertension phenotype as a dichotomous variable by both {chi}2 and logistic regression analyses. First, the hypertensive subjects were classified as NMs or not by the aforementioned criteria. Then, the clinical and study characteristics were examined by comparing the 2 groups of hypertensive subjects (Table 4). As previously reported,19 there was a highly significant difference in the female to male ratio (P<0.001; percent females: 15%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9% to 26% in NMs] vs 49% [95% CI, 29% to 84% in the remaining hypertensives]). NMs also had a significantly higher basal PRA level (3.3±0.2 vs 2.3±0.1 ng · mL-1 · h-1; P=0.029) despite the same baseline plasma ALDO levels (19.6±1.1 vs 19.8±0.8 ng/dL; P=0.883). As would be anticipated from the data reported earlier, the T allele of AGT 235 was significantly associated with NM (66% in NMs and 48% in other hypertensives). Neither the ACE D allele (56% in NMs vs 60% in the remaining hypertensives) nor the CYP11B2 -344 T allele (55% in NMs and 61% in other hypertensives) was associated with the NM phenotype. Figure 4 depicts the odds ratios of having the NM phenotype, given various genotype combinations. ACE DD and CYP11B2 -344 TT, whether alone or in combination, did not increase the ability to identify the NM. However, when a hypertensive subject had the AGT 235 TT genotype, there was a 2-fold increase in the odds that the subject would be an NM (95% CI, 1.15 to 3.50; P=0.013). Requiring the individual to also have the CYP11B2 -344 TT genotype did not appreciably alter the odds ratio. Adding ACE DD to AGT 235 TT increased the odds of the subject’s being an NM to 4-fold (nearly double what it was with AGT 235 TT alone; 95% CI, 1.62 to 8.60; P=0.001). Finally, the triple combination of AGT 235 TT, ACE DD, and CYP11B2 -344 TT genotypes resulted in an even further increased likelihood (odds ratio, 5.36) that the subject would be an NM, although the sample size is too small to achieve statistical significance over the double genotype.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Clinical Data in NMs vs Other Hypertensives



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Relative risk of having NM hypertension, as determined by genotype. Odds ratios were determined by {chi}2 analysis and the dichotomous variable NM or all other hypertensive patients. The ACE or CYP11B2 genotypes either singly or together had limited ability to predict the NM hypertensive patient. However, the AGT 235 TT genotype, whether alone or in combination with the other 2, substantially enhanced the ability to identify an NM, with the odds increasing from 2-fold to nearly 6-fold, depending on the gene combination.

The data were also evaluated by logistic regression analysis. The initial model used the 3 genotypes, gender, age, and BMI. Only gender and AGT genotype were significant. With this approach, the odds ratio that male gender was associated with the NM phenotype was 10.2 (P=0.00001), whereas the odds ratio for the AGT 235 TT phenotype was 2.43 (P=0.006), similar to the {chi}2 analysis (Figure 4). The model was then simplified by eliminating age and BMI and analyzing the effect of each genotype, alone and in various combinations. The combination of AGT and ACE genotypes was a significantly better predictor of NM (P=0.0067) than either genotype alone.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
ALDO’s response to Ang II is a well-defined physiologic characteristic that is substantially influence by environmental factors. Maximizing the degree of responsiveness by sodium restriction reduces the background noise and enhances the likelihood that genetic components contributing to this characteristic can be identified. With this approach, several studies have documented that ALDO’s response in non-low-renin hypertensive subjects has a bimodal distribution, with the lower mode being different from that in normotensives without a family history of hypertension.2,6,21,22 These subjects have been termed NMs. This abnormality is heritable and therefore, is an intermediate phenotype for essential hypertension.23 Furthermore, there are several genes that could contribute to variability in this characteristic in individual subjects. The present report documents that the degree of ALDO response varies according to polymorphisms in 3 genes—AGT and ACE that modify Ang II levels and CYP11B2 that codes for ALDO synthase. Polymorphisms in 2 of them individually modify ALDO’s response. Hypertensive subjects who were homozygous for the T allele at amino acid 235 of AGT had a significantly reduced response compared with heterozygotes and those homozygous for the M allele. Likewise, those who were homozygous for the T allele at -344 of CYP11B2 had a decreased response. The polymorphisms in the ACE gene that were tested were not associated with a variable response. However, when the subject was required to have both the AGT 235 TT alleles and the ACE DD alleles, the combination was associated with a reduction in ALDO response that was significantly greater than that which occurred with the AGT gene alone—an example of genetic epistasis. There was also a suggestion that all 3 genes might interact in modifying ALDO’s response to Ang II. Finally, with a case-control approach, polymorphisms in these 3 genes substantially increase the probability of identifying the NM in a hypertensive population.

Intriguingly, the results of the present study raise the potential that genotype can predict phenotype in patients with hypertension. In 1983, Shoback and colleagues3 reported that a subset of the hypertensive population lacked the normal dietary sodium-mediated changes in vascular and adrenal responses to Ang II. Because of the absence of this dietary sodium-dependent modulation, these patients were termed "nonmodulators." During the past 20 years, this subset has been further defined by several investigators throughout the world.2–4,6,12,19,21–23,24–28 Relevant to the present report, SNP markers in both the coding and the 5'-regulatory regions of the AGT gene are associated with the 2 most specific characteristics defining the NM phenotype: ALDO and renal plasma flow responses to Ang II. The present study confirms that the NM phenotype is associated with the mutant allele at the 235th codon of the AGT gene. There was a 2-fold increased likelihood that an individual possessing the AGT 235 TT genotype might be an NM than with any other AGT genotype. The impact of the other 2 genotypes on predicting the NM phenotype was also assessed. Although the ACE I/D polymorphic marker in the 16th intron by itself did not predict NM, it substantially increased the predictive value of the AGT 235 TT genotype when subjects were required to be homozygous for the mutant allele in both genes. With that constraint, the odds ratio of identifying an NM increased to nearly 4-fold. Finally, the SNP in the ALDO synthase gene’s promoter region at -344 also contributed to identifying NMs. However, the statistical relevance of this increased predictability could not be documented, likely owing to the small number of subjects in our sample who were homozygous for the mutant form at all 3 genetic loci.

Previous studies have suggested that the NM phenotype is secondary to altered production of tissue Ang II. The AGT 235 TT and ACE DD genotypes have been reported to be associated with increased AGT and/or Ang II formation.16,29 Therefore, the association of these genotypes with the NM phenotype is not surprising. Intriguing is the interdependence of their effects in modifying ALDO’s response to Ang II. Alone, the ACE DD genotype had no effect on ALDO response, but it greatly enhanced the effect of the AGT TT genotype. Two caveats are apparent. First, decreased ALDO response to Ang II, at least in hypertensive individuals on a low-salt diet, is associated with genes leading to an increased production of Ang II, presumably locally in the adrenals as well as in other tissues, eg, the kidney. Second, the ACE DD genotype contributes to this decreased adrenal responsiveness but only in the presence of a gene that produces increased formation of its substrate. Thus, the influence of the enhanced conversion of Ang I to Ang II physiologically is only manifested pathophysiologically in the presence of an increased level of AGT.

CYP11B2 gene variance has been associated with alterations in ALDO production or levels,17,30,31 with the CYP11B2 -344 TT variant being associated with reduced ALDO secretion. A relation to hypertension has not been reported. The present study confirmed these findings in relation to the ALDO response to Ang II and extended them to a likely role in a subset of hypertensive patients. However, as with the ACE gene, the effect of the CYP11B2 gene polymorphism was only modestly significant by itself, with a substantial enhancement when the individual possessed certain polymorphisms in both the AGT and the CYP11B2 genes. This was particularly evident in the subjects who had the triple genotypes, although statistical superiority could not be documented because of the small sample size. This suggests that the epistasis between the 3 genes is primarily triggered by a change in the AGT level, presumably in the adrenal gland itself. In the absence of that, variability in the function of ACE or ALDO synthase does not appreciably alter the ALDO response to Ang II infusion.

Studies assessing the association and/or linkage of ACE polymorphisms to hypertension have been variable. Most have not found an association,32–34 and no linkage studies have been documented. One exception is the study by O’Donnell et al,35 where, in the Framingham Heart Study, they reported an association between hypertension and the ACE gene but only in men. The present report suggests that the lack of consistency in previous studies is likely related to genetic variability in the populations studied. The ACE and AGT genes are not involved in the hypertensive process in all subjects but only in a minority. Furthermore, the ACE gene probably does not contribute to hypertension by itself but does so only in the presence of a specific polymorphism in another gene, eg, AGT 235 TT. Thus, only if a study investigated the effect of the 2 genes simultaneously would the ACE gene’s effect on hypertension be consistently appreciated.

Only a few studies have examined the influence of gene-gene interaction on the risk of cardiovascular disease. Marre et al36 reported that ACE I/D and AGT M 235 T polymorphisms interact significantly in the development of diabetic nephropathy. Individuals with either the ACE DD or ID genotype and homozygous for the T allele at position 235 of the AGT gene had significantly greater renal impairment than did those with the same ACE genotype but who were homozygous for the AGT 235 M allele. Borecki et al,37 using data derived from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study, reported that there might be a gene-gene interaction in predicting severe hypertension in subjects homozygous for AGT 235 T and ACE D genotypes. However, not all studies have shown a relation between the AGT and ACE genes. Kiema et al38 concluded that polymorphisms in the ACE and AGT genes do not confer an increased risk for the development of hypertension.

The results of the present study should be interpreted conservatively, because it is an association study. However, the controls in this study closely matched the cases, except for the differences in genotype. All subjects were drawn from a single pool of hypertensive patients who were recruited and evaluated under identical circumstances. The only difference between the 2 groups was the presence or absence of the NM intermediate phenotype and the specific genotypes at the AGT, ACE, and CYP11B2 loci. Specifically, 3 other genotypes assessed were not associated with the NM phenotype. It is unlikely that the differences observed were related to errors in genotyping. The phenotyping was performed by a standard protocol, which has previously documented a bimodal distribution in the ALDO response to Ang II in the hypertensive population.2 Given the relation between the ALDO response to Ang II and sodium intake, any misclassification would likely be in the direction of a false-positive, ie, a modulator or a low-renin hypertensive patient being classified as an NM.

Perspectives
The present study documents that specific markers at the AGT, ACE, and ALDO synthase gene loci predict NM essential hypertension. Because the pathophysiologic characteristics of NM hypertension are corrected by administration of an ACE inhibitor, it is likely that a double or triple genotype can be substituted with a high degree of fidelity for the complex physiologic characterization of NM for therapeutic and preventive decision making. Finally, the present study provides a specific example of genetic epistasis that might have relevance to understanding complex interaction of genes in producing changes in human physiologic function with relevance for disease prevention and management.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Dietary, Nursing, and Laboratory staffs of the 3 Clinical Research Centers. The General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) in Boston was funded by a grant from the National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR 02635). The same National Institutes of Health (NIH) center supported the GCRC in Salt Lake City (M01 RR 00064). The research also was supported by the following NIH grants: HL47651, HL59424, and a Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) in Hypertension from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 55000). We also acknowledge the personnel supported by this SCOR in hypertension.


*    Footnotes
 
{dagger}R.R.W. died September 3, 1998, in the crash of Swissair Flight 111 off the coast of Nova Scotia. Back

Received May 7, 2003; first decision May 28, 2003; accepted September 4, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Williams GH, Fisher NDL. Genetic approach to diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in human hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1997; 6: 199–204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Williams GH, Dluhy RG, Lifton RP, Moore TJ, Gleason R, Williams R, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Hollenberg NK. Nonmodulation as an intermediate phenotype in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1992; 20: 788–796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Shoback DM, Williams GH, Moore TJ, Dluhy RG, Podolsky S, Hollenberg NK. Defect in the sodium-modulated tissue responsiveness to angiotensin II in essential hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1983; 72: 2115–2124.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Hopkins PN, Lifton RP, Hollenberg NK, Jeunemaitre X, Hallouin MC, Skuppin J, Williams CS, Dluhy RG, Lalouel JM, Williams RR, Williams GH. Blunted renal vascular response to angiotensin II is associated with a common variant of the angiotensinogen gene and obesity. J Hypertens. 1996; 14: 199–207.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Hopkins PN, Hunt SC, Jeunemaitre X, Smith B, Solorio D, Fisher NDL, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Angiotensin genotype effect on renal and adrenal responses to angiotensin II in essential hypertension Circulation. 2002; 105: 1921–1927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Giacche M, Vuagnat A, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Fisher NDL, Azizi M, Corvol P, Williams GH, Jeunemaitre X. Aldosterone stimulation by angiotensin II: influence of gender, plasma renin and familial resemblance. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 710–716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Vuagnat A, Giacche M, Hopkins PN, Azizi M, Hunt SC, Vedie B, Corvol P, Williams GH, Jeunemaitre X. Blood pressure response to angiotensin II, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and polymorphisms of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene in hypertensive sibling pairs. J Mol Med. 2001; 79: 175–183.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Fisher ND, Hurwitz S, Jeunemaitre X, Price DA, Williams GH, Hollenberg NK. Adrenal response to angiotensin II in black hypertension: lack of sexual dimorphism. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 373–378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Grant FD, Romero JR, Jeunemaitre X, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Low-renin hypertension, altered sodium homeostasis, and an {alpha}-adducin polymorphism. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 191–196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Slim R, Torremocha F, Moreau T, Pizard A, Hunt SC, Vuagnat A, Williams GH, Gauthier F, Jeunemaitre X, Alhenc-Gelas F. Loss-of-function polymorphism of the human kallikrein gene with reduced urinary kallikrein activity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002; 13: 968–976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Tuck ML, Williams GH, Cain JP, Sullivan JM, Dluhy RG. The relationship of age, diastolic blood pressure, and known duration of hypertension to the presence of low renin essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1973; 22: 637–642.

12. Hollenberg NK, Chenitz WR, Adams DF, Williams GH. Reciprocal influence of salt intake on adrenal glomerulosa and renal vascular responses to angiotensin II in normal man. J Clin Invest. 1974; 54: 34–42.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Abnormal renal function, sodium-volume homeostasis and renin system behavior in normal-renin essential hypertension. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press Ltd; 1990: 1349–1370.

14. Underwood RH, Williams GH. The simultaneous measurement of aldosterone, cortisol, and corticosterone in human peripheral plasm by displacement analysis. J Lab Clin Med. 1972; 79: 848–862.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Emmanuel R, Cain JP, Williams GH. Double antibody radioimmunoassay of renin activity and angiotensin II in human peripheral plasma. J Lab Clin Med. 1973; 81: 632–640.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev YV, Lifton RP, Williams CS, Charru A, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Williams RR, Lalouel JM, Corvol P. Molecular basis of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Cell. 1992; 71: 169–180.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. White PC, Slutsker L. Haplotype analysis of CYP11B2. Endocr Res. 1995; 21: 437–442.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Rigat B, Hubert C, Corvol P, Soubrier F. PCR detection of the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the human angiotensin converting enzyme gene (DCP1) (dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase 1). Nucleic Acids Res. 1992; 20: 1433.[Free Full Text]

19. Fisher ND, Ferri C, Bellini C, Santucci A, Gleason R, Williams GH, Hollenberg NK, Seely EW. Age, gender, and nonmodulation: a sexual dimorphism in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 980–985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. McGue M, Wette R, Rao DC. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis. Genet Epidemiol. 1987; 4: 129–155.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Baretta-Piccoli C, Pusterla C, Stadler P, Weidmann P. Blunted aldosterone responsiveness to angiotensin II in normotensive subjects with familial predisposition to essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1988; 6: 57–61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Luparini RL, Ferri C. Santucci A, Balsano F. Atrial natriuretic peptide in nonmodulating essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 803–809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Lifton RP, Hopkins PN, Williams RR, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH, Dluhy RG. Evidence for heritability of nonmodulating essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1989; 13: 884–889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Redgrave JE, Rabinowe SL, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Correction of renal blood flow response to angiotensin II by converting enzyme inhibition in essential hypertensives. J Clin Invest. 1985; 75: 1285–1290.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Uneda S, Fujishima S, Fujiki Y, Tochikubo O, Oda H, Asahina S, Kaneko Y. Renal hemodynamics and the renin-angiotensin system in adolescents genetically predisposed to essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1984; 2: 437–439.

26. VanHooft IMS, Grobbee DE, Derkx FHM, DeLeeuw PW, Schalekamp MA, Hofman A. Renal hemodynamics and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in normotensive subjects with hypertensive and normotensive parents. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 1305–1311.[Abstract]

27. Dluhy RG, Smith K, Taylor T, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Prolonged converting enzyme inhibition in nonmodulating hypertension. Hypertension. 1989; 13: 371–377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Ferri C, Bellini C, Desideri G, Valenti M, De Mattia G, Santucci A, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Relationship between insulin resistance and the renin-angiotensin system in hypertension: linkage of metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular risk. Diabetes. 1999; 48: 1623–1630.[Abstract]

29. Ueda S, Elliott HL, Morton JJ, Connell JM. Enhanced pressor response to angiotensin I in normotensive men with the deletion genotype (DD) for angiotensin-converting enzyme. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 1266–1269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Kupari M, Hautanen A, Lankinen L, Koskinen P, Virolainen J, Nikkila H, White PC. Associations between human aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) gene polymorphism and left ventricular size, mass, and function. Circulation. 1998; 97: 569–575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Hautanena A, Lankinen L, Kupari M, Janne OA, Adlercreutz H, Nikkila H, White PC. Associations between aldosterone synthase gene polymorphism and the adrenocortical function in males. J Intern Med. 1998; 244: 11–18.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Abbud ZA, Wilson AC, Cosgrove NM, Kostis JB. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81: 244–246.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Chiang FT, Lai ZP, Chern TH, Tseng CD, Hsu KL, Lo HM, Tseng YZ. Lack of association of the angiotensin converting enzyme polymorphism with essential hypertension in a Chinese population. Am J Hypertens. 1997; 10: 197–201.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Vassilikioti S, Doumas M, Douma S, Petidis K, Karagiannis A, Balaska K, Vyzantiadis A, Zamboulis C. Angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphism is not related to essential hypertension in a Greek population. Am J Hypertens. 1996; 9: 700–702.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. O’Donnell CJ, Lindpaintner K, Larson MG, Rao VS, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ, Myers RH, Levy D. Evidence for association and genetic linkage of the angiotensin-converting enzyme locus with hypertension and blood pressure in men but not women in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1766–1772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Marre M, Jeunemaitre X, Gallois Y, Rodier M, Chatellier G, Sert C, Dusselier L, Kahal Z, Chaillous L, Halimi S, Muller A, Sackmann H, Bauduceau B, Bled F, Passa P, Alhenc-Gelas F. Contribution of genetic polymorphism in the renin-angiotensin system to the development of renal complications in insulin-dependent diabetes: Genetique de la Nephropathie Dabetique (GENEDIAB) study group. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 1585–1595.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Borecki IB, Province MA, Ludwig EH, Ellison RC, Folsom AR, Heiss G, Lalouel JM, Higgins M, Rao DC. Associations of candidate loci angiotensinogen and angiotensin-converting enzyme with severe hypertension: the NHLBI Family Heart Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1997; 7: 13–21.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Kiema TR, Kauma H, Rantala AO, Lilja M, Reunanen A, Kesaniemi YA, Savolainen MJ. Variation at the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and angiotensinogen gene loci in relation to blood pressure. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 1070–1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Bentley-Lewis, G. K. Adler, T. Perlstein, E. W. Seely, P. N. Hopkins, G. H. Williams, and R. Garg
Body Mass Index Predicts Aldosterone Production in Normotensive Adults on a High-Salt Diet
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4472 - 4475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
O. Gumieniak and G. H. Williams
Response to Type 2 Deiodinase Thr92Ala Polymorphism Is Not Associated With Arterial Hypertension in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): e48 - e48.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Chamarthi, N. S. Kolatkar, S. C. Hunt, J. S. Williams, E. W. Seely, N. J. Brown, L. J. Murphey, X. Jeunemaitre, and G. H. Williams
Urinary Free Cortisol: An Intermediate Phenotype and a Potential Genetic Marker for a Salt-Resistant Subset of Essential Hypertension
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2007; 92(4): 1340 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. Pojoga, N. S. Kolatkar, J. S. Williams, T. S. Perlstein, X. Jeunemaitre, N. J. Brown, P. N. Hopkins, B. A. Raby, and G. H. Williams
{beta}-2 Adrenergic Receptor Diplotype Defines a Subset of Salt-Sensitive Hypertension
Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 892 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. D. Szmuilowicz, G. K. Adler, J. S. Williams, D. E. Green, T. M. Yao, P. N. Hopkins, and E. W. Seely
Relationship between Aldosterone and Progesterone in the Human Menstrual Cycle
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3981 - 3987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. A. Khalil
Dietary salt and hypertension: new molecular targets add more spice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): R509 - R513.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Gumieniak, S. Hurwitz, T. S. Perlstein, U. C. Ngumezi, P. N. Hopkins, X. Jeunemaitre, and G. H. Williams
Aggregation of High-Normal Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone in Hypertensive Families
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 5985 - 5990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. Yagil, N. Hubner, J. Monti, H. Schulz, M. Sapojnikov, F. C. Luft, D. Ganten, and Y. Yagil
Identification of Hypertension-Related Genes Through an Integrated Genomic-Transcriptomic Approach
Circ. Res., April 1, 2005; 96(6): 617 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. H. Gibbons, C. C. Liew, M. O. Goodarzi, J. I. Rotter, W. A. Hsueh, H. M. Siragy, R. Pratt, and V. J. Dzau
Genetic Markers: Progress and Potential for Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25_suppl_1): IV-47 - IV-58.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/5/901    most recent
01.HYP.0000095615.83724.82v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kosachunhanun, N.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kosachunhanun, N.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow Other hypertension