(Hypertension. 2003;42:932.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Queens University (C.S., M.A.A.), Kingston, and the Department of Physiology, University of Western Ontario (R.L.K.), London, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to Dr Michael A. Adams, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6. E-mail adams{at}post.queensu.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: transplantation, renal renin-angiotensin system rats, spontaneously hypertensive arterial pressure angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Regardless of the mechanism, the kidneys of SHR have been shown to have a transplantable, genetically determined abnormality that confers the donors increased level of arterial pressure onto the circulation of the normotensive recipient, usually a hybrid strain.810 A similar effect of transplantation has also been described in humans, wherein arterial pressure after kidney transplantation is shown to be markedly influenced by the cardiovascular status of the donor.11,12 Most studies to date have emphasized that genetic background is one of the most important factors in this response to transplantation.11 Rettig et al11 reported that even when kidneys were transplanted from SHR that had received antihypertensive treatment (ie, such that blood pressures were not allowed to rise to hypertensive levels), the arterial pressure of the recipients rose to hypertensive levels soon after the kidney was transplanted.11 The authors interpreted these results as indicating that although the treatment had controlled arterial pressure and protected the kidney from hypertension-induced damage, reestablishment of hypertension in the recipient was evidence that the genetic background of the donated kidney was a critical factor.
Previous studies have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are particularly efficacious antihypertensive agents in SHR regarding their capacity to induce both structural and functional changes throughout the circulation.13 Importantly, not only do these agents produce a robust lowering of arterial pressure during treatment but also these effects persist long after cessation of treatment.3,14,15 In the present study, our main objective was to determine whether these drug-induced, persistent changes in the circulation specifically involved the kidney. To accomplish this, we performed studies in which we determined: (1) the impact of prolonged enalapril treatment in SHR on the level of mean arterial pressure (MAP) after treatment was stopped, both before and after uninephrectomy, and after within-group kidney transplantations; (2) the impact on the level of MAP when kidneys were cross-transplanted between previously treated and untreated SHR; and (3) the associated changes in the MAP-salt balance relation as an indicator of the responsiveness of the kidney in treated, untreated, and posttransplantation animals.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assessment of MAP
Under isoflurane anesthesia, SHR were implanted with a radiotelemetric pressure transducer (model TA11PA-C40, Data Sciences Inc).16 MAP was determined from data collected every 5 minutes (15 seconds, 150 Hz) by a digital radio signal received by units under each cage (model RA1010, RA1020, or RPC-1; Data Sciences) and transferred by a consolidation matrix (BCM100, Data Sciences) to the data acquisition system (Dataquest LabPRO or Dataquest ART, Data Sciences).
Assessment of MAP After Uninephrectomy
ACE inhibitortreated and control animals were implanted with pressure transducers at 11 weeks of age. At 13 weeks of age, ACE inhibitor therapy was stopped. Two weeks later (15 weeks of age), the animals were uninephrectomized (UNX) under isoflurane anesthesia through a 1-cm incision over the left kidney. The left renal artery and vein and the ureter were isolated and ligated, and the left kidney was removed.
Kidney Transplantation
The kidney transplantation procedure was modified from that of Zhang et al17 and involved isoflurane anesthesia. In donor rats, the left kidney was isolated and perfused with ice-cold, lactated Ringers solution. Recipient native right kidneys were removed, and the inferior vena cava and aorta were cross-clamped (time <40 minutes) before end-to-side anastomosis (10-0 monofilament continuous sutures) of the renal artery and vein to the aorta and vena cava, respectively. Ice-cold, lactated Ringers solution irrigated the donor kidney during the anastomosis, and microfibrillar collagen (Avitene) was placed around the anastomosis site. The ureter was sutured end-to-end (10-0 monofilament). Seven days later, the left native kidney was removed under anesthesia, and a telemetric pressure transducer was implanted distal to the transplanted kidney (ie, each SHR had 1 kidney from this point on). The groups studied were as follows:
Plasma urea (urease enzymatic rate determination) and creatinine concentrations (alkaline picrate method) were assessed at the end of the experiments to assess the status of the kidney.18
MAP-Sodium Balance Relation In Vivo
Changes in MAP after transplantation were characterized after sodium restriction, sodium challenge, and short-term treatment with an angiotensin type 1 antagonist (losartan, 30 mg · kg-1 · d-1x3 days). Salt manipulations involved 3 days of a normal-salt diet (0.4% Na+), 3 days of a low-salt diet (Rens rat chow, 0.03% Na+), and 5 days of a high-salt (normal diet+1% NaCl solution). For all diets, food and fluid were available to the animals ad libitum.
Statistical Analysis
Significant differences between groups were assessed by ANOVA, followed by a comparison of means with a Newman-Keuls post hoc test (P<0.05 was used). Data are presented as either mean±SD or mean±SE, as indicated.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In the second study, within-group kidney transplantations were performed in treated and control groups to ensure that the kidney transplantation procedure per se did not alter the circulatory phenotype or induce immunologic incompatibility. A single kidney was transplanted between littermates within the same group (treated(D=treated), n=4; control(D=control), n=4). Similar to intact SHR after UNX, in previously treated rats that received a kidney from a previously treated SHR, MAP was found to be 16±1.7% below that of untreated rats that received an untreated kidney (Figure 2).
|
In the final study, the effect of cross-over kidney transplantation between previously treated SHR and untreated littermates (control(D=treated), n=8; treated(D=control), n=6) was determined. The findings demonstrate that there was a full cross-over of the MAP profiles as a result of this between-treatment transplantation (Figure 3). Specifically, MAP in untreated SHR that received a kidney from a previously treated littermate (115±6.9 mm Hg) was lowered by 17±1.7% compared with the opposite group. In previously treated SHR that received a kidney from an untreated littermate, MAP increased significantly (139±5.3 mm Hg) to a level that was not different from intact, untreated SHR.
|
Assessment of Kidneys After Transplant Procedure
Surgical failure can be a potential problem in microsurgical renal transplantation, with renal artery stenosis and kidney failure followed by secondary hypertension being the most significant complications.11 There was no evidence of these problems in the present study. Blood pressure profiles in the within-treatment transplant study clearly demonstrated that the transplant procedure itself did not induce changes in the level of arterial pressure. In addition, the plasma levels of both creatinine (donors=53±8.0 µmol/L, n=9; recipients=50±4.7 µmol/L, n=10) and urea (donors=9.2±1.34 mmol/L, n=9; recipients=8.6±1.3 mmol/L, n=10) were found to be similar in all rats regardless of whether they were donors or recipients. These data help confirm the viability of the transplantation procedures.
Assessment of the MAP-Sodium Balance Relation In Vivo
As a further assessment of circulatory status after transplantation, the MAP responses to manipulations of dietary salt intake (low, normal, and high) and to antagonism of the angiotensin type 1 receptor (losartan) were also assessed. The depressor response to short-term (3-day) losartan treatment in control rats that received treated kidneys (control(D=treated), -14.4±5.8%) and in treated rats that received control kidneys (treated(D=control), -18.3±5.9%) was not significantly different. Importantly, a similar depressor response to short-term losartan treatment was found in control rats that received control kidneys (control(D=control), -16.1±1.61%) and in treated rats that received treated kidneys (treated(D=treated), -17.5±1.47%).
In response to manipulations of dietary salt intake, the MAP-urinary sodium relation (Figure 4) was significantly shifted leftward (
11% to 17%) in untreated rats that received a kidney from previously treated rats (control(D=treated)) compared with previously treated rats that received a kidney from untreated SHR (treated(D=control)). Furthermore, there was a similar shift in the MAP-urinary sodium relation in the within-group transplantation study. That is, the difference between treated rats that received treated kidneys (treated(D=treated)) and control rats that received control kidneys (control(D=control);
11% to 16%) was similar to that found in the between-treatment transplantation study.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is an important finding in all 3 studies that the magnitude of the persistent decrease in arterial pressure in SHR with enalapril-treated kidneys versus the untreated group was similar. In fact, even the absolute levels of MAP of the 2 groups were comparable (115 to 126 mm Hg for all SHR with treated kidneys; 140 to 150 mm Hg for all untreated kidneys). Specifically, the consistency shown for both the relative and absolute arterial pressure comparisons provides strong evidence for the importance of the kidney-specific, drug-induced changes or the lack thereof in the persistent effect on MAP. Thus, the increase in MAP toward untreated, hypertensive levels in previously treated SHR that received an untreated kidney also indicates that the effect of the kidney on the particular level of arterial pressure was not altered by the other known drug-induced changes in the circulation (eg, regression of cardiac and regional vascular structure, normalization of baroreflex mechanisms,20 and improvement in endothelial dysfunction21). Previously, the development of hypertension in hybrid normotensive rats transplanted with SHR kidneys was interpreted as primarily being a consequence of the hypertensive genetic background of the donor kidney.2226 The present findings demonstrate that, despite the genetic background, the kidney-specific properties that confer hypertension are modifiable by drug treatment. That is, enalapril treatment has effectively modified the age-related changes in the SHR kidney, such that after transplantation, hypertension in the untreated recipient is reversed. Whether enalapril treatment is also able to produce persistent, transplantable changes in the adult kidney will require further experimentation.
In previous kidney transplantation studies, immunologic incompatibility (eg, graft rejection) between hypertensive and normotensive animals or between hypertensive and hybrid strains was thought to be a significant factor in the development of hypertension after the procedure.25 In the present study, this issue was largely circumvented by having all transplantations occur between littermates. Tissue compatibility was further confirmed in that there was no noticeable impact on the level of MAP in the within-group transplantation study. In addition, the stability of MAP after UNX in both control and treated SHR showed that compensatory renal growth20 does not influence the level of MAP. This assessment was important because compensatory renal growth can occur as early as 48 hours after UNX.20
Numerous investigations have demonstrated that hypertension can be transferred by transplanting kidneys from genetically hypertensive donors to normotensive recipients.12,23,25,2732 Although many of these previous investigations suggested that extrarenal mechanisms are involved in promoting hypertension in SHR, the data from the present studies emphasize the importance of properties intrinsic to the kidney. In particular, the current findings reveal that the renal mechanisms that determine the level of arterial pressure are modifiable and persist after pharmacotherapeutic intervention. Furthermore, although hypertension in SHR is strongly linked to genetic background, the present investigation demonstrates that the kidney-specific effects of enalapril treatment prevail. Further studies need to be performed to determine whether the enalapril effects on the transplanted kidney and thereby on the arterial pressure of the recipient animal are linked to changes in renal vascular structure.
Perspectives
These studies provide a rational basis for developing therapeutic strategies that selectively target the kidney. The findings further suggest that pharmacologic modification of specific properties of the kidney is a possible therapeutic benefit, even in hypertension with a strong genetic basis. Finally, although further investigation with other therapeutic agents is needed, the results suggest that the persistent lowering of arterial pressure that occurs after antihypertensive treatment is an effect that might be accounted for by changes specific to the kidney.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 17, 2003; first decision August 5, 2003; accepted August 18, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Guyton AC, Hall JE, Lohmeier TE, Jackson TE, Kastner PR. Blood pressure regulation: basic concepts. Fed Proc. 1981; 40: 22522256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Dukacz SA, Adams MA, Kline RL. Short- and long-term enalapril affect renal medullary hemodynamics in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: R10R16.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Dahl LK, Heine M. Primary role of renal homografts in setting chronic blood pressure levels in rats. Circ Res. 1975; 36: 692696.
5. Folkow B, Hallback M, Lundgren Y, Weiss L. Background of increased flow resistance and vascular reactivity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Acta Physiol Scand. 1970; 80: 93106.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Folkow B, Hallback M, Lundgren Y, Weiss L. The effects of immunosympathectomy on blood pressure and vascular reactivity in normal and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Acta Physiol Scand. 1972; 84: 512523.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Girardin E, Caverzasio J, Iwai J, Bonjour JP, Muller AF, Grandchamp A. Pressure natriuresis in isolated kidneys from hypertension-prone and hypertension-resistant rats (Dahl rats). Kidney Int. 1980; 18: 1019.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Rettig R, Folberth CG, Graf C, Kopf D, Stauss H, Unger T. Are renal mechanisms involved in primary hypertension? evidence from kidney transplantation studies in rats. Klin Wochenschr. 1991; 69: 597602.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Rettig R, Folberth C, Kopf D, Stauss H, Unger T. Role of the kidney in the pathogenesis of primary hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens [A]. 1990; 12: 9571002.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Guidi E, Menghetti D, Milani S, Montagnino G, Palazzi P, Bianchi G. Hypertension may be transplanted with the kidney in humans: a long-term historical prospective follow-up of recipients grafted with kidneys coming from donors with or without hypertension in their families. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996; 7: 11311138.[Abstract]
11. Rettig R, Bandelow N, Patschan O, Kuttler B, Frey B, Uber A. The importance of the kidney in primary hypertension: insights from cross-transplantation. J Hum Hypertens. 1996; 10: 641644.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Rettig R, Schmitt B, Pelzl B, Speck T. The kidney and primary hypertension: contributions from renal transplantation studies in animals and humans. J Hypertens. 1993; 11: 883891.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Lundie MJ, Friberg P, Kline RL, Adams MA. Long-term inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system in genetic hypertension: analysis of the impact on blood pressure and cardiovascular structural changes [published erratum appears in J Hypertens. 1997;15:1366]. J Hypertens. 1997; 15: 339348.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Adams MA, Bobik A, Korner PI. Enalapril can prevent vascular amplifier development in spontaneously hypertensive rats [published erratum appears in Hypertension. 1991;17:262]. Hypertension. 1990; 16: 252260.
15. Kost CK Jr, Li P, Jackson EK. Blood pressure after captopril withdrawal from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 8287.
16. Hale TM, Okabe H, Bushfield TL, Heaton JPW, Adams MA. Recovery of erectile function after brief aggressive antihypertensive therapy. J Urol. 2002; 168: 348354.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Zhang Z, Schlachta C, Duff J, Stiller C, Grant D, Zhong R. Improved techniques for kidney transplantation in mice. Microsurgery. 1995; 16: 103109.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices. 2nd ed. Tentative guideline, NCCLS publication EP5-T2. Villanova, Pa: NCCLS; 1992.
19. Mulroney SE, Woda C, Johnson M, Pesce C. Gender differences in renal growth and function after uninephrectomy in adult rats. Kidney Int. 1999; 56: 944953.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Head GA, Adams MA. Characterization of the baroreceptor heart rate reflex during development in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1992; 19: 587597.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ruschitzka F, Corti R, Noll G, Luscher TF. A rationale for treatment of endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. J Hypertens Suppl. 1999; 17: S25S35.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Rettig R, Stauss H, Folberth C, Ganten D, Waldherr B, Unger T. Hypertension transmitted by kidneys from stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1989; 257: F197F203.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Rettig R, Folberth CG, Stauss H, Kopf D, Waldherr R, Baldauf G, Unger T. Hypertension in rats induced by renal grafts from renovascular hypertensive donors. Hypertension. 1990; 15: 429435.
24. Rettig R, Folberth C, Stauss H, Kopf D, Waldherr R, Unger T. Role of the kidney in primary hypertension: a renal transplantation study in rats. Am J Physiol. 1990; 258: F606F611.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Kopf D, Waldherr R, Rettig R. Source of kidney determines blood pressure in young renal transplanted rats. Am J Physiol. 1993; 265: F104F111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Graf C, Maser-Gluth C, de Muinck KW, Rettig R. Sodium retention and hypertension after kidney transplantation in rats. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 724730.
27. Patschan O, Kuttler B, Heemann U, Uber A, Rettig R. Kidneys from normotensive donors lower blood pressure in young transplanted spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: R175R180.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Provoost AP, de Keijzer MH, Kort WJ, Wolff ED, Molenaar JC. The glomerular filtration rate of isogeneically transplanted rat kidneys. Kidney Int. 1982; 21: 459469.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Bianchi G, Fox U, Di Francesco GF, Giovanetti AM, Pagetti D. Blood pressure changes produced by kidney cross-transplantation between spontaneously hypertensive rats and normotensive rats. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1974; 47: 435448.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Fox U, Bianchi G. The primary role of the kidney in causing the blood pressure difference between the Milan hypertension strain (MHS) and normotensive rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1976; 3: S71S74.
31. Rettig R, Folberth CG, Graf C, Kopf D, Stauss H, Unger T. Post-transplantation hypertension in recipients of renal grafts from hypertensive donor rats. Clin Invest Med. 1991; 14: 492498.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Sander S, Rettig R, Ehrig B. Role of the native kidney in experimental post-transplantation hypertension. Pflugers Arch. 1996; 431: 971976.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Schluter, A. C. Steinbach, A. Steffen, R. Rettig, and O. Grisk Apocynin-induced vasodilation involves Rho kinase inhibition but not NADPH oxidase inhibition Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2008; 80(2): 271 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Bourque, M. Komolova, K. Nakatsu, and M. A. Adams Long-Term Circulatory Consequences of Perinatal Iron Deficiency in Male Wistar Rats Hypertension, January 1, 2008; 51(1): 154 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Skov, H. Eiskjaer, H. E. Hansen, J. K. Madsen, S. Kvist, and M. J. Mulvany Treatment of Young Subjects at High Familial Risk of Future Hypertension With an Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 89 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schluter, R. Grimm, A. Steinbach, G. Lorenz, R. Rettig, and O. Grisk Neonatal sympathectomy reduces NADPH oxidase activity and vascular resistance in spontaneously hypertensive rat kidneys Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): R391 - R399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rettig and O. Grisk The Kidney as a Determinant of Genetic Hypertension: Evidence From Renal Transplantation Studies Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 463 - 468. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Grisk Sympatho-renal interactions in the determination of arterial pressure: role in hypertension Exp Physiol, March 1, 2005; 90(2): 183 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Smallegange, T. M. Hale, T. L. Bushfield, and M. A. Adams Persistent Lowering of Pressure by Transplanting Kidneys From Adult Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Treated With Brief Antihypertensive Therapy Hypertension, July 1, 2004; 44(1): 89 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |