| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2003;42:1150.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, 30100-Murcia, Spain.
Correspondence to Francisco J. Fenoy, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 30100-Murcia, Spain. E-mail fjfenoy{at}um.es
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: antioxidants kidney oxygen nitric oxide angiotensin II
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In recent years, the physiological role of endogenous O2- generation has been examined mostly in relation to vascular function. In the normal vascular wall, O2- is produced primarily in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and fibroblasts.1 The major enzyme responsible for vascular O2- appears to be NADPH oxidase,2 which catalyzes the production of O2- by the reduction of oxygen.3 O2- is known to avidly react with nitric oxide (NO) to form peroxynitrite,4 thus diminishing the half-life of NO. Ang II regulates5 and increases NADPH oxidase-dependent O2- production in cultured VSMCs,6 in aortic adventitial fibroblasts,7 and in mesangial cells.8
A role for O2- in the control of renal function seems likely because recent studies in rats indicate that O2- production in the renal medulla exerts vasoconstrictor as well as antidiuretic and antinatriuretic actions.9 The mRNA encoding the 5 subunits of the classic phagocyte NADPH oxidase and the proteins p22phox, p47phox, and p67phox have been shown to be present in the normal adult rat kidney.10 It has also been reported that treatment with an AT1R antagonist, a superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetic, or a NADPH oxidase inhibitor reduces the oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rats,11 inhibits the enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback,12 blunts sodium reabsorption in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle,13 and decreases the NADPH oxidase-stimulated O2- production in rat arteries.14 In addition, the intrarenal infusion of a superoxide dismutase inhibitor produces marked vasoconstriction and antinatriuresis; because these effects are potentiated by NO synthesis inhibition, it has been postulated that the renal actions of superoxide are buffered by nitric oxide.15 Therefore, it seems that the balance between superoxide and nitric oxide is important in controlling renal function, but the in vivo effects of Ang II affecting this equilibrium and contributing to modulate renal excretion and hemodynamics are unknown.
Although the experimental evidence supports a role for O2- in the regulation of renal function, little is known about the renal effects of NADPH oxidase inhibitors or O2- scavengers in vivo. In addition, the contribution of NADPH oxidase-dependent generation of O2- to the acute renal actions of Ang II remains to be established. In the present study, the response to intrarenal infusions of a NADPH oxidase inhibitor (apocynin) and a SOD mimetic (tempol) were evaluated to exclude that sources of superoxide other than NADPH oxidase may regulate renal function. Furthermore, the effects of pretreating the kidney with tempol or apocynin on the renal actions of Ang II were studied.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All drugs (tempol, apocynin, valsartan, and Ang II) were administered intrarenally16 in the same volume of fluid (isotonic NaCl solution, at a rate of 50 µL/min), and an intravenous infusion of saline containing [3H]inulin (1 µCi/mL, to allow for glomerular filtration rate measurements) at a rate of 1 mL/100 g per hour was given. The lucigenin-derived chemiluminescence assay5 was used to determine superoxide in renal cortex homogenates.
Protocol 1
Protocol 1 involved characterization of the response of the NO electrodes in vivo (n=5). L-Nitroarginine methylester (10 mg/kg) was given intravenously, and the NO peak current was measured. An intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside was started at a dose (20 µg/kg per minute) that normalizes arterial pressure, and the NO current was redetermined.
Protocol 2
Protocol 2 involved time course studies (n=7). Renal function and [NO] levels were evaluated during a 1-hour period.
Protocols 3 and 4
Protocols 3 and 4 involved characterization of the renal effects of tempol or apocynin (n=6). After a control period, increasing doses of tempol (4, 8, and 16 µmol/kg per minute to yield 250, 500, and 1000 µmol/L in renal arterial plasma at baseline renal blood flow [RBF]19,12) or apocynin (5, 10, and 50 µmol/kg per minute to achieve 300, 600, and 3000 µmol/L renal arterial plasmatic concentrations at baseline RBF14) were consecutively infused into the renal artery for 10 minutes each, and renal function and [NO] were measured during a 10-minute clearance period for each dose. The highest dose of tempol or apocynin tended to decrease arterial pressure; this was avoided by occluding the mesenteric and celiac arteries and by using an aortic clamp.20 Apocynin is a specific inhibitor of NADPH oxidase in blood vessels, with no other known actions.14
Protocol 5
Protocol 5 involved the renal effects of tempol plus apocynin (n=6). These experiments evaluated whether these compounds have additive effects, as an indication that they might produce actions other than suppressing O2-. The doses were the same used above.
Protocols 6 to 9
Protocols 6 to 9 involved the renal effects of Ang II alone (n=7) or in rats pretreated with valsartan (n=7), tempol (n=7), or apocynin (n=6). Either saline, valsartan (160 nmol/kg per minute to yield -10 µmol/L in renal arterial plasma), tempol (8 µmol/kg per minute to achieve 500 µmol/L in renal arterial plasma), or apocynin (10 µmol/kg per minute to obtain 600 µmol/L in renal arterial plasma) were infused. The doses of tempol or apocynin used were the maximum that alter renal function without affecting arterial pressure. Then, Ang II at doses of 1.6, 16, and 160 pmol/kg per minute was successively infused intrarenally (to obtain 0.1, 1, and 10 nmol/L renal arterial plasma concentrations at baseline RBF).
Protocol 10
Protocol 10 involved superoxide levels in renal cortex homogenates (n=6). Ang II (10 nmol/L), valsartan (10 µmol/L), apocynin (600 µmol/L), tempol (500 µmol/L), Ang II plus valsartan, Ang II plus tempol, or Ang II plus apocynin (same doses) were added to the samples and incubated in presence of lucigenin.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Characterization of the Response of the NO Electrode In Vivo
When the electrode is introduced in the renal cortex, an oxidation current peak can be measured at 650 mV (Figure 1). This voltage coincides with the oxidation peak found in vitro in anaerobic NO solutions. The peak height decreases after L-NAME is given (to 24% of control) and is restored during the infusion of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (to 93% of control), indicating that it is probably due to NO.
|
Renal Effects of Tempol, Apocynin, or Tempol Plus Apocynin
Tempol had no significant effects on RBF and slightly decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (-13%) and the filtration fraction (FF, -15%) at the higher dose used (Figure 2). On the other hand, apocynin increased RBF (+31%) and GFR (+19%), having no effect on FF. The coadministration of tempol plus apocynin had no additive effects on renal hemodynamics.
|
Tempol raised UNaV (+33%) and FENa (31%, Figure 3). Apocynin also increased UNaV (+122%) and FENa (+67%). The coadministration of tempol plus apocynin had no additive effects on renal sodium excretion.
|
Tempol increased [NO] (88%) and UNOxV (+68%, Figure 4). In addition, apocynin raised [NO] (+114%) and UNOxV (+98%). The infusion of tempol plus apocynin had no additive effects on renal [NO].
|
Renal Effects of Ang II, Tempol Plus Ang II, and Apocynin Plus Ang II
Ang II similarly reduced RBF (-36%) and GFR (-35%), having no effect on FF (Figure 5). During the infusion of tempol or apocynin, Ang II still reduced RBF, but it had no effect on GFR, thus increasing FF (Figure 5).
|
Ang II lowered UNaV mainly because of the fall in filtered load, because it did not decrease FENa (Figures 5 and 6
). Pretreatment with tempol blocked the antinatriuresis produced by Ang II by preventing the fall in GFR, with no effects on tubular sodium reabsorption. In rats given apocynin, however, Ang II increased UNaV (+61%) by decreasing tubular sodium reabsorption (Figure 6).
|
Ang II alone decreased [NO] (-23%) and UNOxV (-24%). However, in rats pretreated with tempol or apocynin, both [NO] and UNOxV rose during the Ang II administration (Figure 7).
|
Renal Effects of Ang II in Rats Pretreated With Valsartan
Valsartan lowered mean arterial pressure (MAP) (from 120±3 to 114±3 mm Hg) and raised RBF (from 7.67±0.31 to 8.73±0.40 mL/min per gram), but it had no effect on GFR, UNaV, and [NO]. The subsequent intrarenal infusion of Ang II during the administration of valsartan had no effects on MAP, RBF, GFR, and [NO]. The actions of Ang II on UNaV were blunted by valsartan, because only the highest dose of angiotensin used (160 pmol/kg per minute) decreased UNaV (from 7.09±0.67 to 6.08±0.64 µEq/min per gram).
O2- Levels in Renal Cortex Homogenates
The levels of O2- in renal homogenates, as estimated by lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence, increased by +17% in Ang II-incubated (10 nmol/L) cortical homogenates compared with basal O2- generation (2283.94±188.21 photons/min per milligram of protein) (Figure 8). In contrast, valsartan (10 µmol/L), tempol (500 µmol/L), or apocynin (600 µmol/L) markedly reduced basal O2- levels (by -37%, -30%, and -60%, respectively). In renal homogenates preincubated with either valsartan, tempol, or apocynin, Ang II had no effect on O2- levels.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When the rats were infused intrarenally with increasing doses of Ang II, RBF, GFR, UNaV, [NO], and UNOxV fell in a dose-dependent manner, as described previously in dogs22 or rats.23 Ang II increases filtration fraction in dogs, and this has been interpreted as a preferential efferent arteriolar action22; however, this effect does not take place in rats because the peptide causes in this species similar afferent and efferent vasoconstriction.23 The generation of O2- induced by Ang II may contribute to the renal vasoconstriction and antinatriuresis either by a direct effect on vascular smooth muscle cells1,24 or indirectly, by acting on the juxtaglomerular apparatus and enhancing the tubuloglomerular feedback response.12 The Ang II-induced decrease in [NO] observed in the present study is consistent with previous reports that a chronic infusion of Ang II markedly depressed vascular NO production (despite the fact that Ang II increased NOS protein in the kidney) by inducing NADPH oxidase-dependent O2- generation25 and lowered urinary NOx excretion.26 This interaction between O2- and NO has been demonstrated in vitro because it has been shown that O2- decreases NO bioavailability in single renal tubules.13 However, these findings contrast with other reports suggesting that Ang II increases NO concentrations in the renal cortex27 and that activation of the renin-angiotensin system during sodium depletion, or Ang II infusion in rats maintained on a normal sodium intake, stimulate a vasodilator signaling cascade that includes bradykinin, NO, and cGMP.28 The reasons explaining these differences are unknown, but they may be related to the fact that in these studies Ang II was infused intravenously, and the concentration of the peptide reaching the kidney may have been insufficient to stimulate O2- generation.
The acute intrarenal infusion of valsartan lowered MAP and raised RBF without affecting GFR, UNaV, and [NO]. Similarly, it has been reported that losartan had no effect on renal cortical cGMP levels in sodium-depleted or sodium-replete rats.28 In addition, the effects of Ang II on RBF, GFR, UNaV, [NO], and UNOxV were totally abolished by pretreatment with the AT1R antagonist. These results indicate that the physiological effects of Ang II are mainly mediated through the stimulation of the AT1R. The fact that the fall observed in cortical NO concentration and UNOxV is prevented by valsartan suggests that the increase in renal O2- levels is triggered by AT1R stimulation, as previously suggested.29 An alternative possibility would be that Ang II may act on AT2 receptors during AT1R blockade and increase NO levels.28
Pretreatment with tempol had no effect on the renal vasoconstriction produced by Ang II. However, the SOD mimetic prevented the Ang II-induced fall in GFR, therefore increasing filtration fraction, suggesting a preferential afferent dilatory effect. Tempol also maintained renal cortical NO, UNOxV, and UNaV during the infusion of Ang II. These results are compatible with the idea that the increase in O2- generation produced by Ang II reduces NO within the kidney, thus contributing to some of the excretory and glomerular effects of the peptide. It is known that Ang II reduces glomerular surface area30 by promoting mesangial cells contraction31 and O2- production.8 It is also known that those mesangial effects of Ang II can be blunted by NO.31 Therefore, it seems reasonable to postulate that the effect of tempol preventing the fall in GFR produced by Ang II may be due to increased NO bioavailability, as previously suggested.26 A role for O2- in potentiating the antinatriuresis produced by Ang II seems likely, since it is known that O2- reduces sodium excretion9,15 and because this Ang II effect is also prevented by tempol. In addition, tempol precludes the increase in plasma endothelin and isoprostanes caused by Ang II, and this action is thought to participate in impairing some of the renal hemodynamic Ang II effects.26
In the present study, pretreatment with the NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin raised RBF, GFR, UNaV, [NO], and UNOxV. Apocynin also blunted the renal vasoconstriction observed during the subsequent infusion of Ang II and increased filtration fraction, indicating a preferential afferent arteriolar effect. This suggests that the stimulation of NADPH oxidase-dependent O2- generation contributes to the vasoconstrictor effects of Ang II and is compatible with the recent finding that O2- is a potent renal vasoconstrictor.9,15 Apocynin abolished the actions of Ang II on GFR, UNaV, [NO], and UNOxV. It has been reported that Ang II specifically activates the NADPH oxidase enzyme system and promotes O2- generation.6 Also, it is known that apocynin blocks the activation of NADPH oxidase32 and is capable of increasing NO bioavailability.14 The five subunits of the classic phagocyte NADPH oxidase are expressed in the normal adult rat kidney at specific sites such as the renal artery, afferent and efferent arterioles, glomeruli, distal tubules, and macula densa.10 This suggests that the NADPH oxidase-dependent increased renal O2- generation stimulated by Ang II may limit NO bioavailability in the kidney. Therefore, O2- appears to participate as a modulator in the Ang II regulation of Na+ transport and renal hemodynamics.
To further evaluate the idea that Ang II increases renal NADPH oxidase-induced O2- generation and reduces [NO], we measured the O2- levels in renal cortex homogenates incubated with Ang II, valsartan, tempol, or apocynin. We found that Ang II enhanced O2-5 production and that this effect was blocked by coincubation with valsartan,2,24,33 tempol,5 or apocynin.14,34 In addition, the basal levels of O2- were diminished by valsartan, tempol, and apocynin. These in vitro experiments indicate that there is a basal O2- production in renal homogenates that is dependent on the stimulation of the AT1R and NADPH oxidase. Moreover, the stimulation of AT1R increases the NADPH oxidase-dependent superoxide generation, and this effect may contribute to the renal excretory and hemodynamic actions of Ang II.
In summary, the data in the present study indicate that there is within the kidney a basal NADPH oxidase-dependent generation of O2- that reduces NO bioavailability and modulates renal function. In addition, this NADPH oxidase-dependent generation of O2- is stimulated by Ang II and contributes to the acute renal actions of this peptide.
Perspectives
In the past few years, increasing evidence indicates that oxygen-derived free radicals modulate vascular function and arterial pressure in several models of arterial hypertension. Because the kidney and specifically the pressure-natriuresis phenomenon is thought to play a central role in the long-term control of arterial pressure, a more precise understanding of the renal mechanisms involved in the effects of free radicals influencing blood pressure regulation will be necessary to improve our knowledge of the pathophysiology of arterial hypertension.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 6, 2003; first decision August 19, 2003; accepted October 8, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Just, C. L. Whitten, and W. J. Arendshorst Reactive oxygen species participate in acute renal vasoconstrictor responses induced by ETA and ETB receptors Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): F719 - F728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Moreno, I. Rodriguez Gomez, R. Wangensteen, M. Alvarez-Guerra, J. d. D. Luna, J. Garcia-Estan, and F. Vargas Tempol improves renal hemodynamics and pressure natriuresis in hyperthyroid rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R867 - R873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson, D. G. Gillespie, C. Zhu, J. Ren, L. C. Zacharia, and Z. Mi {alpha}2-Adrenoceptors Enhance Angiotensin II-Induced Renal Vasoconstriction: Role for NADPH Oxidase and RhoA Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 719 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bedard and K.-H. Krause The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: Physiology and Pathophysiology Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 245 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Just, A. J. M. Olson, C. L. Whitten, and W. J. Arendshorst Superoxide mediates acute renal vasoconstriction produced by angiotensin II and catecholamines by a mechanism independent of nitric oxide Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H83 - H92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kopkan, A. Castillo, L. G. Navar, and D. S. A. Majid Enhanced superoxide generation modulates renal function in ANG II-induced hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): F80 - F86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. T. de Richelieu, C. M. Sorensen, N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou, and M. Salomonsson NO-independent mechanism mediates tempol-induced renal vasodilation in SHR Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): F1227 - F1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Salom, B. Arregui, L. F. Carbonell, F. Ruiz, J. L. Gonzalez-Mora, and F. J. Fenoy Renal ischemia induces an increase in nitric oxide levels from tissue stores Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): R1459 - R1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Thomas, C. Tikellis, W. M. Burns, K. Bialkowski, Z. Cao, M. T. Coughlan, K. Jandeleit-Dahm, M. E. Cooper, and J. M. Forbes Interactions between Renin Angiotensin System and Advanced Glycation in the Kidney J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 2976 - 2984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Patterson, C. R. Mouton, J. J. Mullins, and K. D. Mitchell Interactive effects of superoxide anion and nitric oxide on blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in transgenic rats with inducible malignant hypertension Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): F754 - F759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Pollock Endothelin, Angiotensin, and Oxidative Stress in Hypertension Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 477 - 480. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. A. Majid, A. Nishiyama, K. E. Jackson, and A. Castillo Superoxide scavenging attenuates renal responses to ANG II during nitric oxide synthase inhibition in anesthetized dogs Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): F412 - F419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Li and A. M Shah Endothelial cell superoxide generation: regulation and relevance for cardiovascular pathophysiology Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): R1014 - R1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||