| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2004;43:151.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial Commentaries |
From Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc., Holliston, Mass.
Correspondence to Dr Gary F. Mitchell, Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc., 327 Fiske Street, Holliston, MA 01746. E-mail GaryFMitchell{at}mindspring.com
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The arterial and renal components of the cardio-aorto-renal ménage au trois are highlighted in a review by Safar et al in this issue of Hypertension.5 In work that has spanned nearly 3 decades, Professor Safar and colleagues have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of the role of abnormal arterial function in renal disease. As detailed in the review, they have shown that after accounting for common risk factors, increased arterial stiffness is present at various stages of renal dysfunction and represents a grave prognostic indicator. In an end-stage renal disease cohort, they demonstrated that arterial wall stiffness was an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and that failure of arterial stiffness to improve after an intervention that lowered blood pressure was also associated with increased total mortality. Conversely, they found that serum creatinine on an index examination is associated with increased arterial stiffness in a cross-sectional analysis and is an independent predictor of further arterial stiffening when evaluated prospectively. However, as detailed in the review, many aspects of the relationship between arterial stiffness and renal dysfunction and the effects on the heart remain incompletely understood.
| What Is Arterial Stiffness? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Potential Effects of Aortic Stiffening on Renal Function |
|---|
|
|
|---|
75% of the series resistance of the bed and therefore dissipate most of the mean and pulsatile energy content of the advancing pressure and flow waveform before it reaches the capillary. In contrast, glomerular capillaries are positioned between afferent and efferent arterioles. Because efferent arteriolar resistance is normally greater than afferent resistance, the pressure drop across the afferent arteriole is relatively low, so mean and pulsatile pressures in the glomerulus are relatively high (
60% of arterial values). This increased level of hydrostatic pressure maintains a high glomerular filtration fraction, which is normally
20% of renal plasma flow but exposes the glomerular capillary to potentially damaging pulsatile pressures if aortic stiffness and pulse pressure are elevated. The kidney normally autoregulates blood flow and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) across a wide range of perfusion pressures. The combination of myogenic tone in the afferent arteriole and tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF), which modulates tone in afferent and efferent arterioles, mediates the bulk of this autoregulation, which has traditionally been defined in terms of mean arterial pressure. However, recent studies have shown that myogenic tone in the afferent arteriole is affected by pressure pulsatility.7 Therefore, if pulse pressure rises out of proportion to mean pressure, renal vascular resistance will rise and renal blood flow will fall. This blood pressure pattern is commonly observed with advancing age beyond the fifth decade8 and may provide a hemodynamic mechanism for an age-related decline in renal blood flow and GFR. TGF may normally offset a component of any pulse pressure-related increase in afferent arteriolar tone while also increasing efferent arteriolar tone directly and through activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). However, activation of the RAAS may adversely impact aortic and ventricular structure and function, leading to a vicious cycle. Furthermore, a TGF-mediated increase in GFR comes at the expense of restoring some of the excessive pressure pulsatility in the glomerulus, leading to a compromise between conflicting goals of attenuating pulsatile pressure exposure in the glomerulus while maintaining GFR. Clearly, this highly speculative chain of events needs to be evaluated in appropriate models.
A long-term increase in pulse pressure with or without an increase in afferent arteriolar tone also results in higher than normal dissipation of pulsatile energy in the microcirculation of the kidney (and elsewhere). This biophysical stimulus has been shown to trigger upregulation of many mechanosensitive genes and may result in long-term remodeling of the renal microcirculation. In summary, glomerular dysfunction, remodeling, or loss created by the foregoing mechanisms may underlie the association between elevated pulse pressure and reduced renal function and may partially explain why pulse pressure is a strong independent predictor of microalbuminuria3,4 and progressive nephropathy.9
| Renal Dysfunction May Adversely Affect Aortic Function |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Implications and Perspective |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Future research should focus on unraveling the foregoing interrelationships between cardiac, aortic, and renal function. Additional data are needed that evaluate the relationship between renal function and aortic stiffness in unbiased community-based samples. Future studies should include a direct assessment of GFR, rather than using regression-based approaches. The latter formulas include terms for age, weight, and gender, which are important and potentially confounding determinants of aortic stiffness. Aortic stiffness should also be measured directly and the focus should probably be on central aortic properties (characteristic impedance and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity). The role of microvascular remodeling in the kidney (and elsewhere in the body) and the relationship of this process to aortic stiffening and pulsatile load should be investigated. Gross changes in kidney structure and volume, as assessed by computerized tomography or MRI, may also provide clues to the deleterious effects of abnormal cardio-aorto-renal coupling. Finally, a number of known and emerging biomarkers, including markers/mediators of RAAS activation, inflammation, oxidative stress, protein glycation, bone mineralization, and calcium metabolism and natriuretic peptides, may provide mechanistic and prognostic insights. Novel animal models of increased large artery stiffness are needed to prospectively evaluate the effects of increased pulsatile load on renal function during the life of the animal. A more thorough characterization of large and small artery structure and function in the subtotal nephrectomy model is needed. Finally, a better understanding of the effects of various classes of drugs on large artery stiffness and intra-renal hemodynamics may enhance our ability to successfully intervene in the vicious cycle of aortic stiffening and progressive renal dysfunction and soften the unfavorable aortic "connection" that the French have so eloquently exposed.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Dr Mitchell is the owner of Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc., a company that designs and manufactures devices that measure vascular stiffness. The company uses these devices in clinical trials that evaluate the effects of diseases and interventions on vascular stiffness.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Smith and P. J. Levy Review: New techniques for assessment of vascular function Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 373 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cheung, A. R. Sharrett, R. Klein, M. H. Criqui, F.M. A. Islam, K. J. Macura, M. F. Cotch, B. E.K. Klein, and T. Y. Wong Aortic Distensibility and Retinal Arteriolar Narrowing: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): 617 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Safar Mechanism(s) of Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Drug Therapy in Hypertension Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 167 - 171. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, M. R. Mannarino, G. Pucci, G. Savarese, S. S. Franklin, and E. Mannarino Relation Between Renal Function Within the Normal Range and Central and Peripheral Arterial Stiffness in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 616 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Mitchell, J. A. Vita, M. G. Larson, H. Parise, M. J. Keyes, E. Warner, R. S. Vasan, D. Levy, and E. J. Benjamin Cross-Sectional Relations of Peripheral Microvascular Function, Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, and Aortic Stiffness: The Framingham Heart Study Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24): 3722 - 3728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. V. Dantas and K. Sandberg Regulation of ACE2 and ANG-(1-7) in the aorta: new insights into the renin-angiotensin system in the control of vascular function Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H980 - H981. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Verhave, P. Fesler, G. du Cailar, J. Ribstein, M. E. Safar, and A. Mimran Elevated Pulse Pressure Is Associated With Low Renal Function in Elderly Patients With Isolated Systolic Hypertension Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 586 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Mitchell, H. Parise, E. J. Benjamin, M. G. Larson, M. J. Keyes, J. A. Vita, R. S. Vasan, and D. Levy Changes in Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection With Advancing Age in Healthy Men and Women: The Framingham Heart Study Hypertension, June 1, 2004; 43(6): 1239 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |