| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2004;43:347.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contribution |
From the Department of Pharmacology, New York Medical College, Valhalla.
Correspondence to Francisca Rodriguez, PhD, Department of Pharmacology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595. E-mail francisca_rodrigues{at}nymc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: kidney carbon monoxide nitric oxide heme oxygenase
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is difficult to predict the impact of variations in NO synthesis on the activity of the heme-HO system, because NO downregulates the activity of constitutively-expressed HO-2 while upregulating HO-1 protein expression.6,7,10,11 Information on this point is relevant to the notion that the status of NO synthesis conditions the vasomotor response to HO inhibition in gracilis muscle arterioles and renal interlobular arteries ex vivo, and in the rat kidney and hind limb in vivo.5,14 For example, after NOS inhibition, an increase in HO product generation may help condition the associated intensification of the vasoconstrictor effect of HO inhibitors.5,14
The present study was undertaken to determine whether treatment with an NOS inhibitor affects the activity of the renal heme-HO system. We contrasted untreated rats and rats undergoing treatment with a NOS inhibitor in terms of renal expression of HO-1 and HO-2, renal CO-generating activity, and urinary CO concentration and excretion.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Protocols
Protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Studies were conducted on male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River, Wilmington, Mass; 300 to 325 g body weight) treated and not treated with L-NAME. L-NAME was provided in the drinking water at a daily dose of 74.3±1.0 and 29.8±0.5 mg/kg in short- and long-term treatment studies lasting 2 days and 6 weeks, respectively.
On the last day of treatment, control and experimental animals anesthetized with thiobutabarbital (50 mg/kg IP) and ketamine (30 mg/kg IM) were prepared for assessment of urinary CO. The rats were instrumented with polyethylene cannulas in the trachea (PE-205) to aid ventilation, the left femoral artery (PE-50) for measurement of blood pressure,5 the left femoral vein (PE-50) for administration of drugs and fluids (0.15-mol/L NaCl; 2.7 mL/h throughout the study), and the bladder (PE-60) for urine collection. After a 60-minute equilibration interval, 2 or 3 urine samples (
100-µL each) for CO analysis were collected consecutively. Animals in the short-term L-NAME treatment protocol were subsequently injected with the HO inhibitor SnMP (40 µmol/kg IV) and, after a 45-minute interval, urine specimens for CO analysis were again collected as described above. In other animals not instrumented for urine collection, the kidneys were excised and frozen in liquid N2 for later assessment of HO isoform protein expression and CO-generating activity.
Assessment of HO Isoform Expression
Kidneys were homogenized in ice-cold 50-mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1% NP-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1-mmol/L EDTA, and 10% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Chemical Co). Homogenates were centrifuged (10 000g for 30 minutes) and the supernatant was saved for protein assay and Western blot analysis in triplicate of HO-1, HO-2, and ß-actin according to published procedures16 utilizing antibodies provided by Stressgen Biotechnologies. Immunocomplexed bands were visualized and quantified by densitometric analysis. Data are expressed as the HO isoform/ß-actin ratio.
Assessment of CO-Generating Activity
Kidneys were homogenized in ice-cold 0.1-mol/L potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1.37-mol/L NaCl, 0.027-mol/L KCl, 0.1-mmol/L butylated hydroxytoluene, and 10% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Chemical Co). Subsequently, the homogenates were centrifuged (10 000 for 15 minutes at 4°C), the protein content of the supernatant was assayed, and an aliquot (10 to 20 µL containing
300-µg protein) was reacted with 40-µmol/L heme in the presence and absence of a NADPH-generating system consisting of 10-mmol/L MgCl2, 6.8-mmol/L glucose-6-phosphate, 3.3-U/mL glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and 2.6-mmol/L NADPH. When so noted, SNAP (0.01 to 1.0 mmol/L) was included in the incubation mixture to test the effect of NO on the CO-generating activity of homogenates prepared from kidneys of L-NAME-treated rats.
The reaction mixture (1 mL final volume) was incubated for 1 hour at 37°C in 2-mL amber vials capped with rubberized Teflon liners. Subsequently, the vials were placed on ice, an internal standard made of isotopically-labeled CO (13C18O, Sigma Chemical Co.) was injected into the vials, and the CO content of the headspace was determined by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy, as previously described.3 CO-generating activity is expressed as pmol/mg protein/h. Values obtained in the absence of NADPH (NADPH-independent CO generation) were subtracted from values in the presence of NADPH (total CO generation); the resulting values represent the NADPH-dependent generation of CO, which is an index of HO activity.17 In contrast, NADPH-independent generation of CO is considered not to involve HO-1 or HO-2, as these enzymes require NADPH for expression of catalytic activity.1,17 This is consistent with the result of experiments showing that the HO inhibitor chromium mesoporphyrin (50 µmol/L) reduces by 84.8±7.4% (n=4; P<0.05) the NADPH-dependent generation of CO by renal homogenates, without affecting the NADPH-independent generation of the gas.
Analysis of CO in Urine
CO was measured by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy as previously described,3 in urine specimens collected into amber vials (2 mL), capped with rubberized Teflon liners perforated with one G-23 and one G-30 needle which, respectively, allow the specimens to flow into the vials under isobaric conditions.18 Immediately after completion of sample collection, the internal standard was added, the needles were removed, the perforations were sealed, and the samples were analyzed.
Data Analysis
Results are expressed as means±SEM. Data on urinary CO concentration and excretion are the average of 2 or 3 consecutive collection periods. Results were analyzed as appropriate by Student t test for unpaired observations or by a 2-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls post hoc test. The null hypothesis was rejected at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Figure 3 displays data on urinary CO concentration and excretion in untreated (n=5) and L-NAME treated (n=7) rats before and after administration of SnMP. Before treatment with SnMP, values of urinary CO concentration and excretion rate in untreated rats were exceeded (P<0.05) by corresponding values in rats treated with L-NAME for 2 days. The administration of the HO inhibitor SnMP acutely decreased (P<0.05) urinary CO concentration and excretion rate in rats with and without L-NAME treatment. Mean arterial pressure was not affected significantly by SnMP administration to untreated (106±3 versus 100±2 mm Hg) or L-NAME-treated rats (140±3 versus 133±3 mm Hg). Urine volume was similarly unaffected consistently by SnMP in untreated (8.8±4.0 versus 28.4±14.2 µL/min, P=0.2795) or L-NAME treated rats (7.7±1.8 versus 13.5±4.4 µL/min, P=0.2568).
|
Effects of Long-Term L-NAME Treatment on the Renal Heme-HO System
The mean arterial pressure of rats treated with L-NAME for 6 weeks (n=5) exceeded that of untreated rats (n=5, 144±5 versus 111±4 mm Hg, P<0.05). As shown in Figure 4, HO-1 and HO-2 proteins were similarly expressed in kidneys of untreated and L-NAME treated animals. In contrast, the values of urinary CO concentration and excretion in rats treated with the NOS inhibitor were clearly elevated (P<0.05) relative to corresponding values in untreated rats. Hence, renal HO isoform expression and urinary CO were similarly affected by short- and long-term treatment with L-NAME.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study demonstrates for the first time that the status of NO synthesis influences the urinary concentration and excretion rate of CO in anesthetized rats. It also confirms that urinary CO concentration and excretion rate fall after treatment with SnMP,18 an indication that urinary CO arises from HO-catalyzed generation of the gas, presumably within the kidney. Accordingly, our finding that NO synthesis inhibition with L-NAME promotes urinary excretion of CO implies that endogenous NO is an inhibitory regulator of the renal heme-HO system.
According to our results, upregulation of urinary CO levels after NOS inhibition is not attributable to upregulation of HO isoforms, as the renal expression of HO-1 and HO-2 was not significantly affected by either short- or long-term treatment with L-NAME. Rather, our study suggests that elevation of urinary CO after NOS inhibition is related to an increase in the CO-generating activity of renal HO. In this regard, we found that the NADPH-dependent component, but not the NADPH-independent component, of CO-generating activity is increased in kidneys of L-NAME-treated rats relative to corresponding values in kidneys of untreated controls. As NADPH-dependent generation of CO is a measure of HO activity,17 our results suggest that NO synthesis inhibition with L-NAME upregulates the CO-generating activity of renal HO. Although it is a distinct possibility, it remains to be determined whether NOS inhibition also promotes CO production in tissues other than the kidney.
That NOS inhibition enhances HO-dependent generation of CO in the kidney implies that endogenous NO inhibits renal HO. In support of this notion, we found that the NO donor SNAP inhibits NADPH-dependent, but not NADPH-independent, generation of CO by renal homogenates derived from L-NAME-treated rats. This finding is in agreement with previous reports that exogenous NO inhibits HO activity.9,10 According to one study, the inhibitory effect of NO on HO activity is a consequence of heme nitrosylation which reduces the suitability of the modified porphyrin as a substrate for HO.9 According to another study, NO combines with the heme bound to the heme regulatory motif of HO-2 and selectively decreases the catalytic activity of HO-2.10 Our study offers no information on whether or not upregulation of renal CO-generating activity and urinary CO levels after NOS inhibition rely on upregulation of the activity of one or both renal HO isoforms.
Augmentation of renal CO production after NOS inhibition may have major functional consequences, because HO-derived CO is believed to decrease renal vascular reactivity to constrictor stimuli and promote renal vasodilation.3,5,8,20 For example, it is conceivable that upregulation of renal CO production during NOS inhibition brings about attenuation of the renal vasoconstriction known to be associated with diminished production of NO.4,5 This notion is in keeping with a recent report that the renal vasoconstriction ensuing after administration of the HO inhibitor SnMP is greatly magnified in rats pretreated with L-NAME.5 Consideration should also be given to the possibility that upregulation of renal CO production impacts on renal excretory functions, because HO inhibition was shown to promote diuresis and natriuresis due to decreased absorption of fluid and sodium in the loop of Henle.21 In the present study, however, urine volume was not consistently affected by SnMP in either untreated or L-NAME-treated rats.
In summary, the present study demonstrates that NOS inhibition with L-NAME elevates urinary CO levels and promotes urinary CO excretion without affecting the renal expression of either HO-1 or HO-2. After NOS inhibition, the augmentation of urinary CO concentration and excretion rate appears linked to an increase in the CO-generating activity of renal HO. These findings imply that endogenous NO exerts a tonic inhibitory influence on the heme-HO system of the kidney.
Perspectives
Previous reports established that NOS inhibition enhances the functional relevance of the heme-HO system, facilitating CO-induced vasodilation and intensifying the vasoconstriction that accompanies inhibition of HO.2,5,13,14 Such observations, in conjunction with the present finding that NO inhibition upregulates renal CO generation, are compelling reasons to consider the heme-HO system a potential player in the homeostatic response to disorders that feature deficient synthesis or bioavailability of NO. Indeed, there is evidence that the renal heme-HO system subserves a renoprotective role in angiotensin-dependent models of hypertension in which NO bioavailability is believed to be diminished.22,23
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 30, 2003; first decision October 27, 2003; accepted November 26, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Zhang F, Kaide J-I, Rodriguez-Mulero F, Abraham NG, and Nasjletti A. Vasoregulatory function of the heme-heme oxygenase-carbon monoxide system. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14: 62S67S.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kaide J-I, Zhang F, Wei Y, Jiang H, Yu C, Wang WH, Balazy M, Abraham NG, and Nasjletti A. Carbon monoxide of vascular origin attenuates the sensitivity of renal arterial vessels to vasoconstrictors. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 11631171.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Baylis C and Qiu C. Importance of nitric oxide in the control of renal hemodynamics. Kidney Int. 1996; 49: 17271731.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Rodriguez F, Zhang F, Dinocca S, and Nasjletti A. Nitric oxide synthesis influences the renal vascular response to heme oxygenase inhibition. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003; 284: F1255F1262.
6. Foresti R, Hoque M, Bains S, Green CJ, and Motterlini R. Haem and nitric oxide: synergism in the modulation of the endothelial haem oxygenase-1 pathway. Biochem J. 2003; 372: 381390.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Foresti R and Motterlini R. The heme oxygenase pathway and its interaction with nitric oxide in the control of cellular homeostasis. Free Radic Res. 1999; 31: 459475.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Thorup C, Jones CL, Gross SS, Moore LC, and Goligorsky MS. Carbon monoxide induces vasodilation and nitric oxide release but suppresses endothelial NOS. Am J Physiol. 1999; 277: F882F889.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Juckett M, Zheng Y, Yuan H, Pastor T, Antholine W, Weber M, and Vercellotti G. Heme and the endothelium: effects of nitric oxide on catalytic iron and heme degradation by heme oxygenase. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 2338823397.
10. Ding Y, McCoubrey WK, and Maines MD. Interaction of heme oxygenase-2 with nitric oxide donors: is the oxygenase an intracellular sink for NO? Eur J Biochem. 1996; 264: 854861.
11. Durante W, Kroll MH, Christodoulides N, Peyton KJ, and Schafer AI. Nitric oxide induces heme oxygenase-1 gene expression and carbon monoxide production in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1997; 80: 557564.
12. Wu L, Cao K, Lu Y, and Wang R. Different mechanisms underlying the stimulation of K(Ca) channels by nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. J Clin Invest. 2002; 110: 691700.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Johnson FK and Johnson RA. Carbon monoxide promotes endothelium-dependent constriction of isolated gracilis muscle arterioles. Am J Physiol: Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 285: R536R541.
14. Johnson FK, Teran FJ, Prieto-Carrasquero M, and Johnson RA. Vascular effects of a heme oxygenase inhibitor are enhanced in the absence of nitric oxide. Am J Hypertens. 2002; 15: 10741080.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Drummond GS, Galbraith RA, Sardana MK, and Kappas A. Reduction of the C2 and C4 vinyl groups of Sn-protoporphyrin to form Sn-mesoporphyrin markedly enhances the ability of the metalloporphyrin to inhibit in vivo heme catabolism. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1987; 255: 6474.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. da Silva JL, Zand BA, Yang LM, Sabaawy HE, Lianos E, and Abraham NG. Heme oxygenase isoform-specific expression and distribution in the rat kidney. Kidney Int. 2001; 59: 14481457.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Vreman HJ and Stevenson DK. Heme oxygenase activity as measured by carbon monoxide production. Anal Biochem. 1988; 168: 3138.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Rodriguez F, Kemp R, Balazy M, and Nasjletti A. Effects of exogenous heme on renal function: role of heme oxygenase and cyclooxygenase. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 680684.
19. Hill-Kapturczak N, Chang SH, and Agarwal A. Heme oxygenase and the kidney. DNA Cell Biol. 2002; 21: 307321.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. ODonaughy TL and Walker BR. Renal vasodilatory influence of endogenous carbon monoxide in chronically hypoxic rats. Am J Physiol: Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 279: H2908H2915.
21. Wang T, Sterling H, Shao WA, Yan Q, Bailey MA, Giebisch G, and Wang WH. Inhibition of heme oxygenase decreases sodium and fluid absorption in the loop of Henle. Am J Physiol: Renal Physiol. 2003; 285: F484F490.
22. Aizawa T, Ishizaka N, Taguchi J, Nagai R, Mori I, Tang SS, Ingelfinger JR, and Ohno M. Heme oxygenase-1 is upregulated in the kidney of angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats: possible role in renoprotection. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 800806.
23. Wiesel P, Patel AP, Carvajal IM, Wang ZY, Pellacani A, Maemura K, DiFonzo N, Rennke HG, Layne MD, Yet SF, Lee ME, and Perrella MA. Exacerbation of chronic renovascular hypertension and acute renal failure in heme oxygenase-1-deficient mice. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 10881094.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. G. Abraham, J. Cao, D. Sacerdoti, X. Li, and G. Drummond Heme oxygenase: the key to renal function regulation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): F1137 - F1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Lamon, F. F. Zhang, N. Puri, S. V. Brodsky, M. S. Goligorsky, and A. Nasjletti Dual Pathways of Carbon Monoxide-Mediated Vasoregulation: Modulation by Redox Mechanisms Circ. Res., October 9, 2009; 105(8): 775 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ren, M. A. D'Ambrosio, H. Wang, R. Liu, J. L. Garvin, and O. A. Carretero Heme oxygenase metabolites inhibit tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F1207 - F1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Abraham and A. Kappas Pharmacological and Clinical Aspects of Heme Oxygenase Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2008; 60(1): 79 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Stec, H. A. Drummond, and T. Vera Role of Carbon Monoxide in Blood Pressure Regulation Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 597 - 604. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Salom, S. Nieto Ceron, F. Rodriguez, B. Lopez, I. Hernandez, J. Gil Martinez, A. Martinez Losa, and F. J. Fenoy Heme oxygenase-1 induction improves ischemic renal failure: role of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3542 - H3549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. T. Botros and L. G. Navar Interaction between endogenously produced carbon monoxide and nitric oxide in regulation of renal afferent arterioles Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2772 - H2778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Leffler, L. Balabanova, A. L. Fedinec, and H. Parfenova Nitric oxide increases carbon monoxide production by piglet cerebral microvessels Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): H1442 - H1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Herrera and J. L. Garvin Recent Advances in the Regulation of Nitric Oxide in the Kidney Hypertension, June 1, 2005; 45(6): 1062 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |