This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 43/5/1029    most recent 01.HYP.0000125230.46080.c6v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Oikarinen, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Oikarinen, L. Related Collections Clinical Studies Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs Hypertrophy Electrocardiology

(Hypertension. 2004;43:1029.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

QRS Duration and QT Interval Predict Mortality in Hypertensive Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study

Lasse Oikarinen; Markku S. Nieminen; Matti Viitasalo; Lauri Toivonen; Sverker Jern; Björn Dahlöf; Richard B. Devereux; Peter M. Okin for the LIFE Study Investigators

From the Division of Cardiology (L.O., M.S.N., M.V., L.T.), Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra (S.J., B.D.), Göteborg, Sweden; and Division of Cardiology (R.B.D., P.M.O.), Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY.

Correspondence to Dr Lasse Oikarinen, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail lasse.oikarinen{at}kolumbus.fi

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Left ventricular hypertrophy is a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality, including sudden cardiac death. Experimentally, left ventricular hypertrophy delays ventricular conduction and prolongs action potential duration. Electrocardiographic QRS duration and QT interval measures reflect these changes, but whether these measures can further stratify risk in patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is unknown. We measured the QRS duration and QT intervals from the baseline 12-lead electrocardiograms in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study, which included hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy randomized to either losartan-based or atenolol-based treatment to lower blood pressure. In the present study, we related study baseline electrocardiographic measures to cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. There were 5429 patients (male 45.8%; mean age 66±7 years) included in the present analyses. After a mean follow-up of 4.9±0.8 years, there were 417 deaths from all causes, including 214 cardiovascular deaths. In separate univariate Cox regression analyses, QRS duration and several QT measures were significant predictors of cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. However, in multivariate Cox analyses including all electrocardiographic measures and adjusting for other risk factors as well as treatment strategy, only QRS duration and maximum rate-adjusted QT_apex interval remained as significant independent predictors of cardiovascular (P=0.022 and P=0.037, respectively) and all-cause mortality (P=0.038 and P=0.002, respectively). In conclusion, in a hypertensive risk population identified by electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, increased QRS duration and maximum QT_apex interval can further stratify mortality risk even in the setting of effective blood pressure-lowering treatment.

Key Words: electrocardiography • hypertension • mortality • hypertrophy

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an important indicator of target organ damage in chronic arterial hypertension. Electrocardiographically and echocardiographically detected LVH independently predict increased morbidity and mortality,^1,2 including sudden cardiac death,^3,4 and the relative risk of these events increases with increasing LV mass. The impact of LVH on outcome may in part be mediated by adverse changes in LV mechanical function. However, LVH also induces potentially arrhythmogenic changes in LV electrophysiology. Experimental evidence shows that LVH alters ventricular conduction and repolarization.^5–14 In the 12-lead ECG, these changes may prolong the QRS and QT interval duration, respectively, and affect T-wave morphology.^15–17 In hypertensive patients with ECG LVH, increase in LV mass was associated with prolonged QRS and QT interval duration and measures of QT dispersion.¹⁸ However, it is unknown if these ECG measures can further stratify risk in patients with LVH. Therefore, we investigated, in a large longitudinal study of hypertensive patients with ECG evidence of LVH, the value of QRS duration, QT interval duration, and QT dispersion as predictors of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Study Population
The present study population originated from The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study. The study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline characteristics of the LIFE study population, and the main results of the LIFE study have been previously published.^19–21 ECG evidence of LVH was an inclusion criterion in the LIFE study.^19,20 The study was approved by institutional review committees, and all subjects gave informed consent. After randomization, target blood pressure was <140/90 mm Hg and patients were followed-up for at least 4 years.

All 9193 patients included in the LIFE study were considered eligible for the present study, in which 5429 patients were included. The QT substudy center excluded the ECGs from 3764 patients from the present study before any knowledge of the outcome data because of the following reasons: (1) missing data (n=236) or low quality of the received ECG (n=130); (2) ECG recording not suitable for QT dispersion analysis (2 simultaneously recorded leads, amplitude calibration other than 10 mm/mV, or only 1 signal-averaged QRS-T complex in the ECG; n=1570); (3) generally accepted exclusion criteria from QT measurements (atrial fibrillation, bundle branch block, heart rate <40 or >120 bpm; n=889); and (4) QT dispersion measurement not technically feasible according to predefined criteria (wandering signal baselines, <6 leads with 2 measurable consecutive QRS-T complexes [<3 precordial leads], or drugs possibly affecting QT intervals; n=939).

QRS Duration, QT Interval, and QT Dispersion Measures
A trained technician, unaware of the clinical data or the study design, performed all ECG QRS and QT interval measurements. The measurement procedure and intraobserver variability for measurements have been described in detail previously.¹⁸ QRS duration, QT_apex (QRS onset to T-wave apex), and QT_end (QRS onset to T-wave end) interval measurements were performed from ECGs recorded at the randomization visit. All included ECGs had an ECG paper speed of either 25 or 50 mm/s. For each patient, maximum QRS duration (referred to later as QRS duration) and maximum QT_apex and QT_end intervals in any lead were determined, and the latter were rate-adjusted with the nomogram (Nc) method (referred to later as QT_apexNc and QT_endNc, respectively).²² QT_apex dispersion was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of all QT_apex intervals in the 12 leads (QT_apexSD). QT_endSD was calculated in a similar fashion. Visible T-wave abnormalities (typical strain pattern and/or Minnesota codes 5:1 or 5:2) were defined as previously described.^23,24

Outcome Measures
For the present study, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality were prespecified as primary endpoints. We also used the LIFE study primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke).^19,21

Statistical Analysis
The ECG analyses were prespecified as part of the LIFE ECG substudy protocol. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 10.0.7 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). All continuous data are presented as mean±SD. Mean values were compared between groups by use of independent samples t test, except for ECG measures, which were compared by use of 2-way ANOVA adjusting for differences in ECG paper speed, because it has an effect on estimates of QT interval measures.^18,25,26 Proportions were compared by ² tests. Outcome rates were calculated by the product-limit method and were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method, with comparisons of outcome rates between dichotomized groups performed with the log-rank test. Dichotomized groups were created for QRS duration and each QT measure by the median value of the respective ECG measure in both ECG paper speed categories, because of the effect of ECG paper speed on QT variables, and because of the fact that outcome rates were slightly higher in centers using an ECG paper speed of 25 mm/s.

Outcome analyses for ECG measures were performed by Cox proportional hazard models by studying each ECG variable separately after adjusting for ECG paper speed. To test the independence of each ECG measure as a predictor of outcome, multivariate Cox models were used. Finally, to identify those ECG variables with the strongest predictive power, all ECG variables and covariates were included in the same multivariate Cox model. A 2-tailed P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patient Characteristics
During the follow-up (mean follow-up 4.9±0.8 years), 214 (3.9%) patients died from cardiovascular causes, 417 patients (7.7%) died from all causes, and 581 patients (10.7%) experienced the LIFE study composite endpoint. Patients who experienced cardiovascular death compared with those who did not were older, more often men, and had higher baseline systolic blood pressure, Framingham risk score,²⁷ baseline Sokolow-Lyon voltage, Cornell voltage duration product, and a greater decrease in systolic blood pressure (Table 1). There were no differences between these groups in baseline diastolic blood pressure or change in diastolic blood pressure. The results were similar when comparing those who experienced the LIFE study composite endpoint to those who did not (data not shown). Comparing those who died (all-cause mortality) to survivors, similar differences again were detected between groups, except baseline diastolic blood pressure was lower in those who died (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Clinical and Electrocardiographic Variables in Relation to Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality

QRS Duration, QT Measures, and Cardiovascular Mortality
The relations of QRS duration and QT measures to cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality are also shown in Table 1. All such ECG measures were greater in those patients who had cardiovascular death or all-cause death compared with those who did not experience the respective outcome measure. The results were similar comparing those who experienced the LIFE study composite endpoint to those who did not (data not shown).

Visible T-wave abnormalities were present in 1315 patients (24.2%) at study baseline (617 patients [11.4%] showed the typical strain pattern). QT_apexNc was longer in patients with visible T-wave abnormalities than in those without them (365±23 versus 353±22 ms, respectively; P<0.0001). Visible T-wave abnormalities were associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality (Table 1).

In Cox regression analyses, after adjusting for ECG paper speed, QRS duration and all QT measures separately predicted cardiovascular mortality (Table 2). After adjusting for QRS duration, QT_apexNc (P=0.011) remained a predictor of cardiovascular mortality, whereas QT_endNc did not (P=0.434). When stratifying the study population by QRS duration above and below the median values in both ECG paper speed categories, those above the median had cardiovascular death more often (P=0.0006 by log-rank test; Figure). The results were similar for groups similarly dichotomized by median QT_apexNc (P=0.0017; Figure), QT_apexSD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.67 [95% CI: 1.27 to 2.20], P=0.0002), and QT_endSD (HR 1.49 [95% CI: 1.13 to 1.95], P=0.0042), whereas there was no significant difference in QT_endNc (P=0.11). In separate multivariate Cox analyses adjusting each ECG measure for covariates (gender, baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure, treatment arm [losartan or atenolol], baseline Framingham risk score, Sokolow-Lyon voltage and Cornell voltage duration product, ECG paper speed), QRS duration, QT_apexNc, and QT_apexSD remained significant predictors (Table 2), even after further adjustment for the presence of visible T-wave abnormalities in the ECG. After entering all ECG measures and covariates in the same model, QRS duration (²=5.3; P=0.022; HR 1.16 per SD [13 ms] of QRS [95% CI: 1.09 to 1.24]) and QT_apexNc (²=4.3; P=0.037; HR 1.16 per SD [23 ms] of QT_apexNc [95% CI: 1.08 to 1.24]) were independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality. In patients with both QRS duration and QT_apexNc median, cardiovascular mortality rate was significantly higher than in patients who had both measures below the median (90/1514 [5.9%] versus 42/1501 [2.8%] patients, respectively; HR 2.14 [95% CI: 1.49 to 3.09], P<0.0001).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Cox Proportional Hazards Models for Prediction of the Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality Examining ECG Measures as Continuous Variables*

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Kaplan-Meier event-probability curves in patients above and below median values for QRS duration (left panels) and maximum rate-adjusted QTapex interval (QTapexNc; right panels) for cardiovascular mortality (upper panels) and all-cause mortality (lower panels). Median values were 106 ms (ECG paper speed 25 mm/s) and 100 ms (50 mm/s) for QRS duration, and 360 ms and 351 ms for QTapexNc, respectively. See text for the rationale of equal proportions of patients from both paper speed categories in the 2 groups. The probability value is from the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are also shown.

QRS Duration, QT Measures, and All-Cause Mortality
In Cox regression analyses, after adjusting for ECG paper speed, QRS duration and all QT measures separately predicted all-cause mortality (Table 2). After adjusting for QRS duration, QT_apexNc (P<0.001) and QT_endNc (P=0.006) remained as significant predictors of all-cause mortality. When stratifying the study population by QRS duration above and below median values in both ECG paper speed categories, those above the median died more often (P=0.0038 by log-rank test; Figure). The results were similar for groups similarly dichotomized by median QT_apexNc (P=0.0002; Figure), QT_endNc (HR 1.44 [95% CI: 1.19 to 1.76], P=0.0002), QT_apexSD (HR 1.29 [95% CI: 1.06 to 1.56], P=0.010), and QT_endSD (HR 1.29 [95% CI: 1.07 to 1.57], P=0.0090). In separate multivariate Cox analyses adjusting each ECG variable for covariates, QRS duration, QT_apexNc, and QT_endNc remained significant predictors (Table 2), even after further adjustment for the presence of visible T-wave abnormalities in the ECG. After entering all ECG measures and covariates in the same model, QRS duration (²=4.3; P=0.038; HR 1.10 per SD [13 ms] of QRS [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.16]) and QT_apexNc (²=9.6; P=0.002; HR 1.17 per SD [23 ms] of QT_apexNc [95% CI: 1.11 to 1.23]) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality. In patients with both QRS duration and QT_apexNc median, all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher than in patients who had both measures below the median (158/1514 [10.4%] versus 91/1501 [6.1%] patients, respectively; HR 1.75 [95% CI: 1.35 to 2.26], P<0.0001).

QRS Duration, QT Measures, and LIFE Study Composite Endpoint
In separate Cox regression analyses, after adjusting for ECG paper speed, QRS duration (P=0.004), QT_apexNc (P=0.0001), QT_endNc (P=0.005), QT_apexSD (P<0.0001), and QT_endSD (P<0.0001) predicted the LIFE study composite endpoint. In separate multivariate Cox analysis adjusting each ECG variable for covariates, QT_apexNc (P=0.004), QT_apexSD (P=0.019), and QT_endSD (P=0.007) remained as significant predictors. After entering all ECG measures and covariates in the same model, QT_apexNc (²=4.9; P=0.027; HR 1.11 per SD [23 ms] of QT_apexNc [95% CI: 1.06 to 1.16]) and QT_endSD (²=5.1; P=0.024; HR 1.10 per SD [6.3 ms] of QT_endSD [95% CI: 1.06 to 1.15]) were independent predictors of the LIFE study composite endpoint.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Main Findings
The present results show that in hypertensive patients with ECG evidence of LVH, prolonged QRS duration, and maximum QT_apex interval in the baseline ECG were independently associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, even in the setting of effective blood pressure-lowering treatment.

QRS Duration, QT Intervals, and Mortality in Patients With LVH
The LIFE study included only patients with ECG evidence of LVH. In previous studies it has been shown that patients with ECG LVH, compared with those without ECG LVH, are at higher risk for cardiovascular mortality, including sudden cardiac death.^1,3 Within the group of patients with LVH, the relative risk of these events increases as LV mass increases.^2,4,28 Previously, we showed in a subgroup from the LIFE study that QRS duration and QT interval measures prolong as LV mass increases,¹⁸ suggesting that these ECG measures might identify LVH patients at even higher risk.

Our present results show that prolonged QRS duration is, independently of several baseline prognostic variables, associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. An increased QRS duration was associated with a 28% higher rate of cardiovascular mortality and a 21% higher rate of all-cause mortality for every SD of the mean increase in value within the range of studied values. Furthermore, QRS duration retained its independent predictive value when all QT interval variables were included in the model. In experimental studies, chronic LVH delays ventricular conduction,⁵ which seems to be related to an increase in intracellular resistivity caused by increased gap junctional resistance between adjacent cells, and to loss of conduction anisotropy.^6,7 In the ECG, QRS duration is a measure of differences in activation times.²⁹ The observed prognostic value of QRS duration in the present study may be related in part to the fact that delayed conduction per se is one of the factors increasing susceptibility to reentrant ventricular arrhythmias. In addition, prolonged QRS duration may be a marker of cellular uncoupling, and even small changes in cellular coupling may have profound effects on repolarization gradients at the myocardial level.^17,30

We also observed that prolongation of maximum rate-adjusted QT intervals were predictors of all outcome measures. An increased QT_apexNc was associated with a 27% higher rate of cardiovascular mortality and a 25% higher rate of all-cause mortality for every SD of the mean increase in value within the range of studied values. QT_apexNc was a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality independently of QRS duration, the other QT measures, and the studied covariates. Even when adjusting for the presence of visible T-wave abnormalities, QT_apexNc remained a significant predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

In experimental studies, LVH has been consistently associated with prolongation of action potential duration (APD),^8–13 which may occur in a spatially heterogenous fashion, possibly increasing the arrhythmic vulnerability.^{10–12,31,32} In LVH, the changes in epicardial versus endocardial APDs have been disparate, with some studies showing prolongation of APD in the epicardium only,^13,33 preferentially in the epicardium³² or preferentially in the endocardium.³⁴ The mechanisms of these changes in LVH may be related, in part, to downregulation of the slow component of the delayed rectifier potassium current (I_Ks),^17,35,36 as well as to prolongation of epicardial repolarization time (sum of activation time and APD), because of prolonged transmural activation time and loss of the inverse relation between activation time and APD as a consequence of reduced cell-to-cell coupling induced by fibrosis characteristic of pathological hypertrophy.^29,37 In the electrogram, QT_apex interval reflects epicardial or endocardial APD depending on T-wave polarity.^16,17,29 In the present study, visible T-wave abnormalities were more frequent in those patients who experienced cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and QT_apexNc was longer in patients with these abnormalities. Importantly, however, the predictive value of QT_apexNc remained significant even after taking the presence of visible T-wave abnormalities into account, suggesting that QT_apexNc is not just another way of characterizing T-wave inversions. In a population at high coronary risk, QT_apexNc was a strong predictor of sudden cardiac death, but not of fatal myocardial infarction,³⁸ possibly linking QT_apexNc to arrhythmic vulnerability. In a subgroup of the LIFE study population, we observed regression of both ECG indices of LVH and echocardiographic LVH to be associated with a significant shortening of QT_apexNc after 1 year of blood pressure-lowering treatment,²⁴ suggesting that effective treatment may partially reverse this adverse repolarization phenotype.

Interestingly, in the present study, patients with both prolonged QRS duration and QT_apexNc seemed to be at substantially higher risk for mortality. In the normal myocardium, reduction in I_Ks prolongs APD in the epicardium and endocardium, but not in the M-cell region, prolonging the QT_apex interval in the ECG.¹⁷ The reduced repolarization reserve caused by decreased I_Ks activity may become arrhythmogenic in the presence of cellular uncoupling, a condition possibly reflected by prolonged QRS duration.^39,40

QT Dispersion and Mortality in Patients With LVH
In univariate analysis QT_apex dispersion predicted all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. When controlling for several covariates of prognostic importance, QT_apexSD remained a predictor of cardiovascular mortality only, but not independently of maximum QT_apex interval. QT_end dispersion predicted all-cause and cardiovascular mortality only in univariate analysis, whereas it did predict the LIFE study composite endpoint even in multivariate analysis. Thus, QT_endSD does not independently further stratify risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in patients with ECG LVH.

Study Limitations
The LIFE study ECG recording procedure was not standardized; therefore, we excluded a significant proportion of ECGs because of technical reasons. However, the exclusion of ECGs was done before any knowledge of the outcome measures, and the present study population seems to be representative of the complete LIFE study population. Because the LIFE study included only patients with ECG-evidence of LVH, it affects the generalizability of the present results; therefore, the prognostic value of all these ECG variables should also be studied in an unselected population of hypertensive patients.

Perspectives
The present results suggest that in hypertensive patients identified as being at high risk by the presence of ECG LVH, baseline QRS duration and QT_apexNc interval can further stratify the risk of mortality despite an intervention to effectively lower blood pressure. It needs to be studied if these ECG parameters indeed are related to arrhythmogenesis, either directly or by preconditioning the myocardium in conjunction with, for example, sympathetic stimulation, ischemic episodes, or drugs affecting I_Kr. Furthermore, the possible differential effects of the various classes of blood pressure-lowering drugs on these ECG markers of risk need to be addressed.

	Acknowledgments

 
This study was supported by a grant from Merck & Co. We thank Paulette A. Lyle for assistance with the preparation of the manuscript.

Received November 6, 2003; first decision December 1, 2003; accepted February 24, 2004.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Offutt D. Left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality in the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1969; 71: 89–105.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322: 1561–1566.[Abstract]
3. Kreger BE, Cupples LA, Kannel WB. The electrocardiogram in prediction of sudden death: Framingham Study experience. Am Heart J. 1987; 113: 377–382.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Haider AW, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Increased left ventricular mass and hypertrophy are associated with increased risk for sudden death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 1454–1459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Winterton SJ, Turner MA, O’Gorman DJ, Flores NA, Sheridan DJ. Hypertrophy causes delayed conduction in human and guinea pig myocardium: accentuation during ischaemic perfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 1994; 28: 47–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. McIntyre H, Fry CH. Abnormal action potential conduction in isolated human hypertrophied left ventricular myocardium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997; 8: 887–894.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Cooklin M, Wallis WR, Sheridan DJ, Fry CH. Changes in cell-to-cell electrical coupling associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. Circ Res. 1997; 80: 765–771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Aronson RS. Characteristics of action potentials of hypertrophied myocardium from rats with renal hypertension. Circ Res. 1980; 47: 443–454.[Free Full Text]
9. Aronson RS. Afterpotentials and triggered activity in hypertrophied myocardium from rats with renal hypertension. Circ Res. 1981; 48: 720–727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Kowey PR, Friechling TD, Sewter J, Wu Y, Sokil A, Paul J, Nocella J. Electrophysiological effects of left ventricular hypertrophy. Effect of calcium and potassium channel blockade. Circulation. 1991; 83: 2067–2075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Ben-David J, Zipes DP, Ayers GM, Pride HP. Canine left ventricular hypertrophy predisposes to ventricular tachycardia induction by phase 2 early afterdepolarizations after administration of BAY K 8644. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 1576–1584.[Abstract]
12. Rials SJ, Wu Y, Ford N, Pauletto FJ, Abramson SV, Rubin AM, Marinchak RA, Kowey PR. Effect of left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression on ventricular electrophysiology and vulnerability to inducible arrhythmia in the feline heart. Circulation. 1995; 91: 426–430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Wolk R, Sneddon KP, Dempster J, Kane KA, Cobbe SM, Hicks MN. Regional electrophysiological effects of left ventricular hypertrophy in isolated rabbit hearts under normal and ischaemic conditions. Cardiovasc Res. 2000; 48: 120–128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Kozhevnikov DO, Yamamoto K, Robotis D, Restivo M, El-Sherif N. Electrophysiological mechanism of enhanced susceptibility of hypertrophied heart to acquired torsade de pointes arrhythmias: tridimensional mapping of activation and recovery patterns. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1128–1134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Surawicz B, Knoebel SB. Long QT: good, bad or indifferent? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 4: 398–413.[Abstract]
16. Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the normal T wave and the electrocardiographic manifestations of the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1928–1936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Gima K, Rudy Y. Ionic current basis of electrocardiographic waveforms: a model study. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 889–896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Oikarinen L, Nieminen MS, Viitasalo M, Toivonen L, Wachtell K, Papademetriou V, Jern S, Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Okin PM. Relation of QT interval and QT dispersion to echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric pattern in hypertensive patients. The LIFE study. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 1883–1891.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Dahlöf B, Devereux R, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Hedner T, Ibsen H, Julius S, Kjeldsen S, Kristianson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Lindholm LH, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H, for the LIFE Study Group. The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) in Hypertension Study: rationale, design, and methods. Am J Hypertens. 1997; 10: 705–713.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Beevers G, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Hedner T, Ibsen H, Kristianson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Lindholm LH, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H. Characteristics of 9194 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: The LIFE Study. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 989–997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Beevers G, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Ibsen H, Kristiansson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Lindholm LH, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H; LIFE Study Group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002; 359: 995–1003.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Karjalainen J, Viitasalo M, Mänttäri M, Manninen V. Relation between QT intervals and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min in rest electrocardiograms of men and a simple method to adjust QT interval values. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 1547–1553.[Abstract]
23. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Nieminen MS, Jern S, Oikarinen L, Viitasalo M, Toivonen L, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Dahlöf B, for the LIFE Study Investigators. Relationship of the electrocardiographic strain pattern to left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients: the LIFE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 514–520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Oikarinen L, Nieminen MS, Toivonen L, Viitasalo M, Wachtell K, Papademetriou V, Jern S, Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Okin PM, for the LIFE Study Investigators. Relation of QT interval and QT dispersion to regression of echocardiographic and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) study. Am Heart J. 2003; 145: 919–925.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Murray A, McLaughlin NB, Bourke JP, Doig JC, Furniss SS, Campbell RW. Errors in manual measurement of QT intervals. Br Heart J. 1994; 71: 386–390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Faber TS, Kautzner J, Zehender M, Camm AJ, Malik M. Impact of electrocardiogram recording format on QT interval measurement and QT dispersion assessment. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001; 24: 1739–1747.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, Kannel WB. An updated coronary risk profile: a statement for health care professionals. Circulation. 1991; 83: 356–362.[Free Full Text]
28. Schillaci G, Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Cuccurullo O, Cosco C, Perticone F. Continuous relation between left ventricular mass and cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 580–586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Franz MR, Bargheer K, Costard-Jäckle A, Miller DC, Lichtlen PR. Human ventricular repolarization and T wave genesis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1991; 33: 369–384.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Viswanathan PC, Shaw RM, Rudy Y. Effects of I_Kr and I_Ks heterogeneity on action potential duration and its rate dependence. A simulation study. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2466–2474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Gillis AM, Mathison HJ, Kulisz E, Lester WM. Dispersion of ventricular repolarization and ventricular fibrillation in left ventricular hypertrophy: influence of selective potassium channel blockers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000; 292: 381–386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. McIntosh MA, Cobbe SM, Kane KA, Rankin AC. Action potential prolongation and potassium currents in left-ventricular myocytes isolated from hypertrophied rabbit hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998; 30: 43–53.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Bryant SM, Shipsey SJ, Hart G. Regional differences in electrical and mechanical properties of myocytes from guinea-pig hearts with mild left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res. 1997; 35: 315–323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Yan GX, Rials SJ, Wu Y, Liu T, Xu X, Marinchak RA, Kowey PR. Ventricular hypertrophy amplifies transmural repolarization dispersion and induces early after depolarizations. Am J Physiol. 2001; 281: H1968–H1975.
35. Xu X, Rials SJ, Wu Y, Salata JJ, Liu T, Bharucha DB, Marinchak RA, Kowey PR. Left ventricular hypertrophy decreases slowly but not rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium currents of epicardial and endocardial myocytes in rabbits. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1585–1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Xu X, Salata JJ, Wang J, Wu Y, Yan GX, Liu T, Marinchak RA, Kowey PR. Increasing I_Ks corrects abnormal repolarization in rabbit models of acquired LQT2 and ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Physiol. 2002; 283: H664–H670.
37. Franz MR, Bargheer K, Rafflenbeul W, Haverich A, Lichtlen PR. Monophasic action potential mapping in human subjects with normal electrocardiograms: direct evidence for the genesis of the T wave. Circulation. 1987; 75: 379–386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Mänttäri M, Oikarinen L, Manninen V, Viitasalo M. QT dispersion as a risk factor for sudden cardiac death and fatal myocardial infarction in a coronary risk population. Heart. 1997; 78: 268–272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Burashnikov A, Antzelevitch C. Prominent I_Ks in epicardium and endocardium contributes to development of transmural dispersion of repolarization but protects against development of early after depolarizations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13: 172–177.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Nerbonne JM, Guo W. Heterogeneous expression of voltage-gated potassium channels in the heart: roles in normal excitation and arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13: 406–409.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Baldesberger, U. Bauersfeld, R. Candinas, B. Seifert, M. Zuber, M. Ritter, R. Jenni, E. Oechslin, P. Luthi, C. Scharf, et al. Sinus node disease and arrhythmias in the long-term follow-up of former professional cyclists Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 71 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Lauer, D. Martino, H. Ishwaran, and E. H. Blackstone Quantitative Measures of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass, Conduction, and Repolarization, and Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): 888 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, T. Ronti, F. Gemelli, G. Pucci, S. Innocente, C. Porcellati, and E. Mannarino Prognostic Impact of Prolonged Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertension. Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2006; 166(8): 909 - 913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Salles, S. Leocadio, K. Bloch, A. R. Nogueira, and E. Muxfeldt Combined QT Interval and Voltage Criteria Improve Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Detection in Resistant Hypertension Hypertension, November 1, 2005; 46(5): 1207 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Triola, M. B. Olson, S. E. Reis, P. Rautaharju, C. N. B. Merz, S. F. Kelsey, L. J. Shaw, B. L. Sharaf, G. Sopko, and S. Saba Electrocardiographic Predictors of Cardiovascular Outcome in Women: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 51 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, S. Julius, M. S. Nieminen, S. Snapinn, K. E. Harris, P. Aurup, J. M. Edelman, et al. Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy During Antihypertensive Treatment and the Prediction of Major Cardiovascular Events JAMA, November 17, 2004; 292(19): 2343 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, M. S. Nieminen, S. Jern, L. Oikarinen, M. Viitasalo, L. Toivonen, S. E. Kjeldsen, S. Julius, S. Snapinn, et al. Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern and Prediction of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Hypertensive Patients Hypertension, July 1, 2004; 44(1): 48 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 43/5/1029    most recent 01.HYP.0000125230.46080.c6v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Oikarinen, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Oikarinen, L. Related Collections Clinical Studies Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs Hypertrophy Electrocardiology