Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2004;43:1035-1041
Published online before print March 22, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000125729.90521.94
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/5/1035    most recent
01.HYP.0000125729.90521.94v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tank, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tank, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

(Hypertension. 2004;43:1035.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

{alpha}-2 Adrenergic Transmission and Human Baroreflex Regulation

Jens Tank; Andre Diedrich; Elke Szczech; Friedrich C. Luft; Jens Jordan

From the Department of Nephrology and Hypertension (J.T., E.S., F.C.L., J.J.), Franz Volhard Clinic, Medical Faculty of the Charité and HELIOS Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; and the Autonomic Dysfunction Service (A.D.), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.

Correspondence to Dr Jens Jordan, Clinical Research Center, Haus 129, Franz-Volhard-Clinic Medical Faculty of the Charité and HELIOS Klinikum, Wiltbergstr. 50, 13125 Berlin, Germany. E-mail jordan{at}fvk.charite-buch.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We observed earlier that central {alpha}-2 adrenoceptor stimulation in mice greatly augments parasympathetic tone. To test the effects in humans, we assessed autonomic vasomotor tone and baroreflex regulation in 9 normal young adults on 2 occasions, once with and once without clonidine. We determined heart rate (HR), beat-by-beat blood pressure (BP), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity. HR variability was analyzed in the time and frequency domain. Pharmacological baroreflex slopes were determined using incremental phenylephrine and nitroprusside infusions. Clonidine lowered resting BP (122±4/73±3 versus 100±7/55±3 mm Hg, P<0.01), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (18±3 versus 4±2 bursts/min, P<0.01), and HR (62±3 versus 56±3 bpm, P<0.05). The baroreflex heart rate curve was reset to much lower HR values and showed no saturation at low HR. HR variability profoundly increased during clonidine plus phenylephrine (total power: 3224±843 versus 8943±2329 ms2, P<0.05). High-frequency power was 1451±520 at baseline and 6720±2475 ms2 during baroreceptor loading (P<0.05). The low-frequency/high-frequency ratio decreased (1.94±0.41 versus 0.69±0.10, P<0.05). In contrast, clonidine reduced resting sympathetic vasomotor tone and shifted the operating point of the sympathetic baroreflex to a flat part of the sympathetic baroreflex curve. The shift decreased the ability of the baroreflex to withdraw sympathetic vasomotor tone during baroreflex loading. These baroreflex changes were associated with a moderate increase in phenylephrine responsiveness. We conclude that {alpha}-2 adrenoceptor stimulation has a differential effect on baroreflex HR and vasomotor regulation. {alpha}-2 Adrenoceptor stimulation greatly augments baroreflex-mediated bradycardia, most likely by parasympathetic activation.


Key Words: antihypertensive, agents • blood pressure • heart rate • baroreflex • sympathetic nervous system


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Changes in arterial blood pressure (BP) are sensed by carotid, aortic, and perhaps coronary baroreceptors.1,2 The signal is integrated in cardiovascular control centers in the brain stem and leads to compensatory adjustments in sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. BP reduction is followed by baroreflex-mediated increases in heart rate (HR) and sympathetic vasomotor tone.1,3,4 An increase in BP attenuates HR and sympathetic vasomotor tone.1,3,4 Thus, the baroreflex serves as a buffer to prevent excessive BP swings.5,6 The buffering function is severely impaired in patients with bilateral damage to baroreceptors or baroreflex afferents (baroreflex failure).7,8 These patients feature extreme volatility of BP. Neuronal degeneration of sympathetic and parasympathetic efferents is tantamount to autonomic failure. Patients with autonomic failure have severe orthostatic hypotension.9,10 These rare diseases illustrate the pivotal role of baroreflexes in short-term cardiovascular regulation in humans. Even subtle changes in baroreflex function may elicit important cardiovascular effects. Adrenergic mechanisms in the brain have an important role in human baroreflex regulation. For example, norepinephrine transporter inhibition causes a selective impairment in baroreflex adjustment of sympathetic vasomotor tone.11 {alpha}-2 Adrenoreceptors are particularly important in central nervous baroreflex regulation, both in animals and in humans.12–14 We conducted studies with the {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor agonist clonidine in freely moving mice and observed a profound increase in the baroreflex HR gain that was explained by parasympathetic activation (unpublished observations). We used the {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor agonist clonidine to test the hypothesis that {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation in humans also improves parasympathetic HR control and baroreflex regulation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
We studied 9 healthy control subjects (6 men, 3 women, age 31±2 years, body mass index 24±1 kg/m2). Written informed consent was obtained before study entry. All studies were approved by the institutional review board. Forty-eight hours before study, volunteers received a diet free of substances that could interfere with catecholamine measurements.

Instrumentation
Respiration and ECG were measured continuously (Cardioscreen; Medis GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany). Beat-by-beat BP (Finapres; Ohmeda, Englewood, Calif) and brachial arterial BP (Dinamap; Critikon, Tampa, Fla) were determined. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was recorded from the right peroneal nerve (MSNA unit; Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Iowa, Iowa City). A unipolar tungsten electrode (uninsulated tip diameter of 1 to 5 µm, shaft diameter of 200 µm) was inserted into the muscle nerve fascicles of the peroneal nerve at the fibular head for multiunit recordings. Nerve activity was amplified with a total gain of 100 000, bandpass-filtered (0.7 to 2 kHz), and integrated.15

Protocol
All tests were conducted with the subjects in the supine position. The subjects underwent testing on 2 separate days. On 1 day, they were studied after ingestion of a placebo tablet with 50 mL water. On another day, they were tested with intravenous clonidine. After a stable baseline was recorded, clonidine was applied as intravenous loading dose (150 µg over 20 minutes), followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 20 µg/hour. On both study days, subjects underwent cold-pressor testing to assess the effects of {alpha}-2 adrenoceptor stimulation on the response to external stimuli. Thereafter, incremental infusions of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine hydrochloride (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 µg/kg per minute over 5 minutes) were administered. The infusions were stopped after the maximum dose had been administered or after diastolic BP had changed by >15 mm Hg. On the placebo day, the subjects received bolus injections of propranolol every 3 minutes (0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 mg/kg) to achieve near-complete ß-adrenoreceptor blockade.16 Subjects received a total intravenous 0.21 mg/kg propranolol dose within 15 minutes. ß Blockade was used to characterize the effect of complete peripheral sympathoinhibition.

Data Acquisition and Analysis
Data were converted from analog to digital at 500 Hz using the Windaq pro+ software (Dataq Instruments Inc, Akron, Ohio). RR intervals, diastolic BP and systolic BP values, and respiration were defined off-line for the complete records using a program written by one of the authors (A.D.), which is based on PV-wave software (Visual Numerics Inc). MSNA bursts were identified after filtering the integrated signal and defining the baseline.15

Spectral Analysis and Baroreflex Sensitivity
Pharmacological baroreflex sensitivity was determined from the steepest part of the sigmoidal curve obtained during phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside infusions. HR and BP variability were determined using spectral analysis, cross-spectral analysis, and the transfer function between relative risk intervals and systolic BP. Analysis was performed for 5-minute segments during different baselines before each intervention17,18 and for 128 seconds during each infusion step.

Statistics
All data are expressed as mean±SEM. Intraindividual differences were compared by the paired t test or the Wilcoxon test. ANOVA testing for repeated measures was used for multiple comparisons. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Resting BP, HR, and MSNA
Baseline BP, HR, and MSNA were similar on the placebo day and on the clonidine day. BP decreased to 100±7/55±3 mm Hg with clonidine (P<0.01). The mean RR interval increased from 989±77 ms before to 1073±85 ms during clonidine (P<0.05). MSNA decreased from 18±3 bursts/min before to 4±2 bursts/min during clonidine (P<0.01; Table 1) Breathing frequency was similar before and during clonidine. During the cold pressor test, systolic BP increased 14±3 mm Hg with placebo and 6±2 mm Hg with clonidine (P<0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Hemodynamic Data at Baseline and During Clonidine

Responses to Phenylephrine and Nitroprusside
Phenylephrine responsiveness was moderately increased during clonidine infusion (P<0.05 by ANOVA). With phenylephrine at an infusion rate of 0.8 µg/kg per minute and systolic BP increased 13±2.0 mm Hg with placebo and 18±2.0 mm Hg with clonidine (Figure 1, top). We were not able to determine nitroprusside dose–response curves on both study days because basal BP was too low on the clonidine day. Furthermore, the increase in phenylephrine infusion rate was limited by marked bradycardia. Therefore, we were able to obtain only a part of the baroreflex curve on clonidine.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Top, Changes in BP with incremental infusion of phenylephrine and nitroprusside during placebo and during clonidine. Phenylephrine responsiveness moderately increased during clonidine infusion (*P<0.05 by ANOVA). Middle, Baroreflex HR curves with placebo and with clonidine. With clonidine, the baroreflex curve was reset to much lower BP values. Bottom, Sympathetic baroreflex curve during placebo and during clonidine. The sympathetic baroreflex curve was reset to lower BP values. The operating point of the baroreflex was at a rather shallow part of the curve.

The maximal steepness of the baroreflex HR curves was not different with placebo or with clonidine (26±3 ms/mm Hg without and 16±2 ms/mm Hg with clonidine) (Figure 1, middle). However, with clonidine, the baroreflex curve was reset to markedly lower BP and HR values. With placebo, the baroreflex curve approached saturation at an RR interval length of approximately 1100 ms. Remarkably, this saturation level was no longer present during clonidine infusion. With both interventions, the operating point was on the steep part of the baroreflex HR curve.

Clonidine infusion caused a resetting of the sympathetic baroreflex curve to lower BP values (Figure 1, bottom). We were not able to determine the maximal gain of the sympathetic baroreflex curve with certainty. Clearly, the operating point was on a rather shallow part of the baroreflex curve during clonidine infusion. With placebo, the operating point was close to the steepest part of the baroreflex curve.

We used the impedance method to assess relative changes in cardiac stroke volume during phenylephrine and nitroprusside infusions. On placebo, we observed a linear relationship between RR interval and cardiac stroke volume. Stroke volume decreased during nitroprusside (–24%±8%, P<0.05) and increased during phenylephrine (14%±6%, P<0.05). Remarkably, stroke volume failed to increase with increasing RR duration during clonidine and during clonidine plus phenylephrine (–1.4±7%).

We determined HR variability at baseline and during baroreflex loading with phenylephrine and baroreflex unloading with nitroprusside.11 Table 2 summarizes the results on HR variability and BP variability. Clonidine increased the relative power in the high-frequency band compared with baseline (39.0±4.7 versus 48.3±3.8, P<0.05) and led to a decrease in the ratio between low- and high-frequency power (1.94±0.41 versus 1.16±0.16, P<0.05). The total power of HR variability, the mean power in the low-frequency band, the mean power in the high-frequency band, and the relative power in the low-frequency band were similar. Baroreceptor loading with phenylephrine during clonidine induced a profound increase in HR variability (Table 2). However, the increase in RR variability with phenylephrine was much more pronounced in the high-frequency range, which further reduced the ratio between low- and high-frequency oscillations (low-frequency/high-frequency ratio). The variability data were plotted against BP (Figure 2). RR variability decreased during baroreflex unloading with nitroprusside and increased during baroreflex loading with phenylephrine. The increase in RR variability with baroreflex loading was profoundly enhanced with clonidine in the high-frequency and low-frequency ranges. For RR variability in the low-frequency range (Figure 2, top left), the slope was 19 ms/mm Hg with placebo and 163 ms/mm Hg with clonidine2 (P=0.002). For RR variability in the high-frequency range (Figure 2, bottom left), the slope was 58 ms/mm Hg with placebo and 350 ms/mm Hg with clonidine2 (P<0.0001). Normalized spectral power density in the low-frequency band was reduced during clonidine (LF n.u. in Figure 2, top right). Normalized spectral power density in the high-frequency band (HF n.u. in Figure 2, bottom right) was increased during clonidine (P<0.05). The profound RR interval variability changes with clonidine were associated with a reduction in the low-frequency/high-frequency ratio. Figure 3 illustrates RR interval time series at baseline, during clonidine, and during clonidine plus phenylephrine in a representative example.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Heart Rate Variability and Blood Pressure Variability Data at Baseline, During Clonidine, and During Clonidine Plus Phenylephrine



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Absolute values of power spectral density of HR variability in the low-frequency range (LF-RR, top left) and in the high-frequency range (HF-RR, bottom left) were plotted against BP during nitroprusside and phenylephrine infusions. The right panel shows the same parameter in normalized units (LF n.u., top right; HF n.u., bottom right). Compared with placebo, clonidine increased HR variability in both frequency ranges during baroreceptor loading. During clonidine, LF n.u. was reduced and HF n.u. was increased.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. RR interval time series (left panel) and power spectra (right panel) during baseline (top), during clonidine (middle), and during clonidine plus phenylephrine (bottom).

Overall systolic BP variability did not change during clonidine (SD: 5.2±0.2 mm Hg) compared with baseline (SD: 5.4±0.3 mm Hg). However, the relationship between systolic BP variability in the low-frequency range and systolic BP was shifted to markedly lower pressure levels (Figure 4).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. BP variability in the low-frequency range (LF-SBP) was plotted against BP during nitroprusside and phenylephrine infusions. Clonidine profoundly reduced LF-SBP at baseline and during phenylephrine infusion.

Response to Systemic ß-Adrenoreceptor Blockade
Near-complete ß blockade with propranolol did not elicit a depressor response. RR interval length increased from 896±31 ms before to 975±39 ms during propranolol. RR variability in the high-frequency range changed from 841±253 ms2 before to 973±221 ms2 during propranolol; RR variability in the low-frequency range was 1710±224 ms2 before and 2376±258 ms2 during propranolol.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We determined the effect of {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation with clonidine on the regulation of sympathetic vasomotor control and HR. The important finding in our study is that clonidine had a differential effect on baroreflex HR and vasomotor regulation. Clonidine profoundly augmented baroreflex-mediated bradycardia, particularly during baroreceptor loading. This effect is consistent with an increased parasympathetic tone. The results are similar to those we found in mice in which we could test the parasympathetic effects more directly (unpublished observation). In contrast, clonidine reduced resting sympathetic vasomotor tone and shifted the operating point of the sympathetic baroreflex to a flat part of the sympathetic baroreflex curve. The shift decreased the ability of the baroreflex to withdraw sympathetic vasomotor tone during baroreflex loading.

We first determined the effect of {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation on phenylephrine responsiveness. In healthy subjects, the pressor response to phenylephrine is attenuated by the baroreflex, the so-called baroreflex BP buffering. Hence, near-complete lesions of baroreflex afferents or efferents are associated with a profound increase in phenylephrine responsiveness.19–22 Disruption of one component of the efferent baroreflex arc is sufficient to decrease baroreflex BP buffering. For example, the selective impairment in sympathetic vasomotor regulation with norepinephrine transporter inhibition led to a 2- to 3-fold increase in phenylephrine responsiveness.11 In the present study, phenylephrine responsiveness was moderately increased with clonidine. The observation suggests that the ability of the baroreflex to buffer BP changes may be reduced because of the fact that sympathetic withdrawal during phenylephrine infusion is absent during {alpha}-2 adrenoceptor stimulation. Changes in vascular responsiveness to phenylephrine may also have contributed to our findings.

We observed marked changes in baroreflex-mediated adjustments of HR and sympathetic vasomotor tone during {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation. As expected, {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation reduced basal sympathetic vasomotor tone. The reduction in neural activity was associated with reduction in low-frequency systolic BP oscillations (Mayer waves). Mayer waves are related to oscillations in sympathetic vasomotor discharge.23–25 All these findings are consistent with the known central sympatholytic effect of clonidine. Given the marked decrease in BP with clonidine, the decrease in sympathetic vasomotor tone cannot be explained by baroreflex-mediated inhibition. We manipulated BP with nitroprusside and phenylephrine to obtain sympathetic baroreflex curves. With placebo, the operating point was on the steep part of the sympathetic baroreflex curve. Small changes in BP resulted in substantial changes in sympathetic vasomotor tone and low-frequency oscillations in systolic BP. In contrast, the operating point of the sympathetic baroreflex was at a rather shallow part of the curve during clonidine infusion. Thus, {alpha}-2 adrenergic activation limits the ability of the baroreflex to withdraw sympathetic activity during baroreflex loading. Similarly, norepinephrine transporter inhibition elicits a selective decrease in baroreflex vasomotor control.11 Animal studies suggest that this phenomenon may also be related to {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation.26

In addition to the effect of {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation on sympathetic vasomotor tone, we observed dramatic changes in HR regulation. Normally, the baroreflex HR curve has a sigmoidal shape that prevents an excessive baroreflex-mediated decrease in HR. {alpha}-2 Adrenoreceptor stimulation caused a resetting of the baroreflex HR curve to much lower BP and HR values. Indeed, we did not see a saturation of the baroreflex HR curve at low HRs. As a consequence of the baroreflex changes, we observed marked bradycardia, particularly during concomitant phenylephrine infusion. However, the steepness of the baroreflex HR curve was similar with placebo and with clonidine. Similar results were obtained in an earlier study using the modified oxford technique for baroreflex assessment.27 In contrast, Sleight et al found an improvement in baroreflex slope in rabbits and in humans.14 Interestingly, a dissociation between resting HR and baroreflex HR control was also observed after exercise.28

We analyzed HR variability during each nitroprusside and phenylephrine infusion step to further assess changes in cardiac regulation during clonidine.11 The depressor and bradycardic response to clonidine makes the interpretation of HR variability data difficult. Nevertheless, stimulation of {alpha}-2 adrenoceptors resulted in a profound increase in HR variability in the low- and high-frequency ranges. Moreover, the relative low frequency power decreased and the relative high-frequency power of the RR interval increased during {alpha}-2 adrenoceptor stimulation. Hence, the low-frequency/high-frequency ratio, which is sometimes termed sympathovagal balance,29,30 decreased. Complete ß-adrenoceptor blockade with propranolol16 did not lead to a similar response. Therefore, sympathetic deactivation at the level of the heart may not be sufficient to explain the HR and HR variability changes with {alpha}-2 adrenoceptor stimulation. The HR variability data and our studies in freely moving mice (unpublished observation) are consistent with the idea that clonidine increased parasympathetic outflow to the heart.

Various mechanisms may contribute to parasympathetic activation of the heart with clonidine. The response may result from a sympathovagal interaction at the level of the brain stem. Clonidine decreases sympathetic outflow from the rostral ventrolateral medulla.31 Decreased activity in this area may lead to a secondary increase in parasympathetic activity.32 It is also possible that clonidine directly influences other areas in the brain stem like vagal nuclei or the caudal ventrolateral medulla. Indeed, {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptors are highly expressed in vagus motor nuclei in animals and in humans.33–35 An interaction between parasympathetic cardiac activation may also occur at the level of the heart. Stimulation of presynaptic {alpha}-2 adrenoceptors may modulate acetylcholine release from cholinergic neurons innervating the heart.32

Remarkably, clonidine changed the relationship between systolic BP changes and cardiac stroke volume. With placebo, stroke volume increased as RR interval increased. On clonidine, stroke volume failed to increase as RR interval further increased. Reductions in cardiac stroke volume with clonidine have also been shown in animal studies.36 Thus, a pressor stimulus elicits an excessive reduction in cardiac output during {alpha}-2 stimulation. The change in the cardiac response to a pressor stimulus tends to improve baroreflex buffering. The previously unknown mechanism may explain why overall BP buffering is only slightly impaired during {alpha}-2 stimulation even though baroreflex vasomotor control is worsened. Our study provides a strong impetus to determine cardiac stroke volume changes during baroreflex testing.

Our studies were performed in normal humans and normal mice. We have not tested these responses in hypertensive patients or animal models. Nevertheless, an important role for {alpha}-2 adrenoceptors in hypertension and various forms of heart failure have been performed that underscore the importance of central sympatholytic effects.37 Our findings suggest that, in addition, a concomitantly increased parasympathetic tone may also participate, particularly in alleviating hypertensive cardiomyopathy or perhaps diastolic dysfunction.

Limitations of the Study
One possible limitation of our study is that we did not use a muscarinic blocker, such as atropine, to confirm parasympathetic activation at the level of the heart. However, we demonstrated that clonidine-induced bradycardia and HR variability changes in mice can be abolished with atropine (unpublished observations). Another potential limitation of our study is that we used 5-minute intervals for phenylephrine and nitroprusside infusions and analyzed the last 128 seconds during each infusion step using fast Fourier transformation. Longer infusion intervals and the use of nonparametric methods of time series analysis might be used in further studies.

Perspectives
Our study may have several important clinical implications. {alpha}-2 Adrenoreceptor stimulation disables a safety mechanism that prevents excessive bradycardia. The mechanism may explain some of the side effects of clonidine and related compounds. Moreover, the {alpha}-2 effect on parasympathetic outflow to the heart may contribute to the pathogenesis of neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope, a condition characterized by episodic bradycardia and hypotension.38 Blockade of {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptors with yohimbine improves orthostatic tolerance in a subset of these patients. Stimulation of {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptors with clonidine worsens the symptoms.4 Decreased HR variability and impaired baroreflex control of the heart is associated with increased cardiovascular risk.39–41 Pharmacological augmentation of HR variability and baroreflex function may be beneficial in this setting. Our study suggests that medications that augment {alpha}-2 adrenergic transmission may be particularly useful in this regard. Finally, infusion of phenylephrine during {alpha}-2 adrenoreceptor stimulation may provide a graded increase in parasympathetic activity. The approach may be useful in determining "parasympathetic reserve." Moreover, the methodology may permit distinguishing functional from structural changes in cardiac parasympathetic regulation.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants. Dr Jordan was recipient of a Helmholtz fellowship of the Max-Delbrueck-Center of Molecular Medicine.

Received January 16, 2004; first decision January 28, 2004; accepted February 24, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Eckberg DL, Rea RF, Andersson OK, Hedner T, Pernow J, Lundberg JM, Wallin BG. Baroreflex modulation of sympathetic activity and sympathetic neurotransmitters in humans. Acta Physiol Scand. 1988; 133: 221–231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Wright C, Drinkhill MJ, Hainsworth R. Reflex effects of independent stimulation of coronary and left ventricular mechanoreceptors in anaesthetised dogs. J Physiol. 2000; 528: 349–358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Grassi G, Cattaneo BM, Seravalle G, Lanfranchi A, Mancia G. Baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in essential and secondary hypertension. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 68–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mosqueda-Garcia R, Fernandez-Violante R, Tank J, Snell M, Cunningham G, Furlan R. Yohimbine in neurally mediated syncope. Pathophysiological implications. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 1824–1830.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Jordan J, Tank J, Shannon JR, Diedrich A, Lipp A, Schroeder C, Arnold G, Sharma AM, Biaggioni I, Robertson D, Luft FC. Baroreflex buffering and susceptibility to vasoactive drugs. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1459–1464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Jones PP, Christou DD, Jordan J, Seals DR. Baroreflex buffering is reduced with age in healthy men. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1770–1774.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Jordan J, Shannon JR, Black B, Costa F, Ertl AC, Furlan R, Biaggioni I, Robertson D. Malignant vagotonia due to selective baroreflex failure. Hypertension. 1997; 30: 1072–1077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Robertson D, Hollister AS, Biaggioni I, Netterville JL, Mosqueda-Garcia R, Robertson RM. The diagnosis and treatment of baroreflex failure. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 1449–1455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bradbury S, Eggleston C. Postural hypotension: a report of three cases. Am Heart J. 1925; 1: 73–86.[CrossRef]
  10. Smit AA, Halliwill JR, Low PA, Wieling W. Pathophysiological basis of orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure. J Physiol Lond. 1999; 519: 1–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Tank J, Schroeder C, Diedrich A, Szczech E, Haertter S, Sharma AM, Luft FC, Jordan J. Selective impairment in sympathetic vasomotor control with norepinephrine transporter inhibition. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2949–2954.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Godwin SJ, Tortelli CF, Parkin ML, Head GA. Comparison of the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex effects of moxonidine, rilmenidine and clonidine in conscious rabbits. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1998; 72: 195–204.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Myers MG. Clonidine-induced facilitation of baroreceptor reflex. Br Med. J. 1977; 2: 802–803.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Sleight P, West MJ, Korner PI, Oliver JR, Chalmers JP, Robinson JL. The action of clonidine on the baroreflex control of heart rate in conscious animals and man, and on single aortic baroreceptor discharge in the rabbit. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1975; 214: 4–11.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Tank J, Diedrich A, Schroeder C, Stoffels M, Franke G, Sharma AM, Luft FC, Jordan J. Limited effect of systemic beta-blockade on sympathetic outflow. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 1377–1381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Jordan J, Tank J, Stoffels M, Franke G, Christensen NJ, Luft FC, Boschmann M. Interaction between beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation and nitric oxide release on tissue perfusion and metabolism. J. Clin. Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86: 2803–2810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Tank J, Baevski RM, Fender A, Baevski AR, Graves KF, Ploewka K, Weck M. Reference values of indices of spontaneous baroreceptor reflex sensitivity. Am J Hypertens. 2000; 13: 268–275.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Tank J, Jordan J, Diedrich A, Stoffels M, Franke G, Faulhaber HD, Luft FC, Busjahn A. Genetic influences on baroreflex function in normal twins. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 907–910.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Robertson D, Hollister AS, Carey EL, Tung C-S, Goldberg MR, Robertson RM. Increased vascular beta2-adrenoreceptor responsiveness in autonomic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 3: 850–856.[Abstract]
  20. Shannon JR, Jordan J, Black B, Costa F, Robertson D. Uncoupling of the baroreflex by NN-cholinergic blockade in dissecting the components of cardiovascular regulation. Hypertension. 1998; 101–107.
  21. Jordan J, Toka HR, Heusser K, Toka O, Shannon JR, Tank J, Diedrich A, Stabroth C, Stoffels M, Naraghi R, Oelkers W, Schuster H, Schobel HP, Haller H, Luft FC. Severely impaired baroreflex-buffering in patients with monogenic hypertension and neurovascular contact. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2611–2618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Page IH, McCubbin JW. Buffer reflexes, tolerance to ganglioplegics and their relationship to enhanced pressor responsiveness. Am J Physiol. 1959; 197: 217–222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Furlan R, Porta A, Costa F, Tank J, Baker L, Schiavi R, Robertson D, Malliani A, Mosqueda-Garcia R. Oscillatory patterns in sympathetic neural discharge and cardiovascular variables during orthostatic stimulus. Circulation. 2000; 101: 886–892.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Preiss G, Polosa C. Patterns of sympathetic neuron activity associated with Mayer waves. Am J Physiol. 1974; 226: 724–730.[Free Full Text]
  25. Kaminski RJ, Meyer GA, Winter DL. Sympathetic unit activity associated with Mayer waves in the spinal dog. Am J Physiol. 1970; 219: 1768–1771.[Free Full Text]
  26. Eisenhofer G, Saigusa T, Esler MD, Cox HS, Angus JA, Dorward PK. Central sympathoinhibition and peripheral neuronal uptake blockade after desipramine in rabbits. Am J Physiol. 1991; 260: R824–R832.
  27. Muzi M, Goff DR, Kampine JP, Roerig DL, Ebert TJ. Clonidine reduces sympathetic activity but maintains baroreflex responses in normotensive humans. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77: 864–871.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Charkoudian N, Halliwill JR, Morgan BJ, Eisenach JH, Joyner MJ. Influences of hydration on post-exercise cardiovascular control in humans. J Physiol. 2003; 552: 635–644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Montano N, Ruscone TG, Porta A, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Malliani A. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation. 1994; 90: 1826–1831.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation. 1991; 84: 482–492.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Head GA. Cardiovascular functions of central noradrenergic neurons in rabbits. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1991; 18: 51–54.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Nosaka S, Murata K, Kobayashi M, Cheng ZB, Maruyama J. Inhibition of baroreflex vagal bradycardia by activation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 279: H1239–H1247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Unnerstall JR, Kopajtic TA, Kuhar MJ. Distribution of alpha 2 agonist binding sites in the rat and human central nervous system: analysis of some functional, anatomic correlates of the pharmacologic effects of clonidine and related adrenergic agents. Brain Res. 1984; 319: 69–101.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. May CN, Dashwood MR, Whitehead CJ, Mathias CJ. Functional and autoradiographic studies to locate the sites at which clonidine acts to cause hyperglycaemia and inhibition of opiate-induced sympathetic outflow. Neuropharmacology. 1990; 29: 545–553.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Robertson HA, Leslie RA. Noradrenergic alpha 2 binding sites in vagal dorsal motor nucleus and nucleus tractus solitarius: autoradiographic localization. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1985; 63: 1190–1194.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Badoer E, Head GA, Korner PI. Effects of intracisternal and intravenous alpha-methyldopa and clonidine on haemodynamics and baroreceptor-heart rate reflex properties in conscious rabbits. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1983; 5: 760–767.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Gavras I, Manolis AJ, Gavras H. The alpha2 -adrenergic receptors in hypertension and heart failure: experimental and clinical studies. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 2115–2124.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Lewis, T. Vasovagal syncope and the carotid sinus mechanism. BMJ. 1932; 1: 873–876.
  39. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North Am Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17: 354–381.[Free Full Text]
  40. Rich MW, Saini JS, Kleiger RE, Carney RM, teVelde A, Freedland KE. Correlation of heart rate variability with clinical and angiographic variables and late mortality after coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 1988; 62: 714–717.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators. Lancet. 1998; 351: 478–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Tank, K. Heusser, A. Diedrich, R. J. Brychta, F. C. Luft, and J. Jordan
Yohimbine Attenuates Baroreflex-Mediated Bradycardia in Humans
Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 899 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. M. Baevsky, V. M. Baranov, I. I. Funtova, A. Diedrich, A. V. Pashenko, A. G. Chernikova, J. Drescher, J. Jordan, and J. Tank
Autonomic cardiovascular and respiratory control during prolonged spaceflights aboard the International Space Station
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 156 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Rao, G. Wen, J. R. Gayen, M. Das, S. M. Vaingankar, B. K. Rana, M. Mahata, B. P. Kennedy, R. M. Salem, M. Stridsberg, et al.
Catecholamine Release-Inhibitory Peptide Catestatin (Chromogranin A352-372): Naturally Occurring Amino Acid Variant Gly364Ser Causes Profound Changes in Human Autonomic Activity and Alters Risk for Hypertension
Circulation, May 1, 2007; 115(17): 2271 - 2281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. Furlan, S. Ardizzone, L. Palazzolo, A. Rimoldi, F. Perego, F. Barbic, M. Bevilacqua, L. Vago, G. B. Porro, and A. Malliani
Sympathetic overactivity in active ulcerative colitis: effects of clonidine
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): R224 - R232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Tank, A. Diedrich, E. Szczech, F. C. Luft, and J. Jordan
Baroreflex Regulation of Heart Rate and Sympathetic Vasomotor Tone in Women and Men
Hypertension, June 1, 2005; 45(6): 1159 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/5/1035    most recent
01.HYP.0000125729.90521.94v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tank, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tank, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing