| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2004;43:1189.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the BHF Cardiac MRI Unit (K.A., M.S., G.B., J.R.), Leeds General Infirmary, UK; BHF Heart Research Centre (Clinical) (K.W., A.S.H.), Leeds General Infirmary, UK; BHF Heart Research Centre (Laboratory) (A.M., A.J.B.), University of Leeds, UK.
Correspondence to Prof Alistair Hall, Academic Unit of Cardiovascular Medicine, G Floor, Jubilee Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. E-mail cvsash{at}leeds.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Comparison between subjects with and subjects without left ventricular hypertrophy revealed an excess of the G_/GG genotype among the group with LV hypertrophy (P=0.031). We observed an association between the angiotensin type-2 receptor (1332 G) allele and the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive subjects.
Key Words: hypertension hypertrophy receptors, angiotensin magnetic resonance imaging genetics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The AT2 receptor is thought to oppose the growth promoting effect of the angiotensin II type-1 (AT1) receptor. Moreover, the balance of AT1 and AT2 receptors seems to be important in determining both vascular and cardiac remodeling.13 Studies show that stimulation of the AT2 receptor is associated with inhibition of growth of vascular smooth muscle cells and apoptosis.14 It has also been shown to inhibit growth of cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts.15 In 2 studies of AT2 knockout mice, LVH did not develop in response to pressure overload, to being induced by constricting the abdominal aorta, or by the infusion of angiotensin II.16,17 An obligatory role of AT2 receptor in the development of cardiac hypertrophy was inferred by the authors. To the contrary, Wu et al found that aortic banding caused cardiac hypertrophy in both AT2+ and AT2 mice to a similar degree and that coronary arterial thickening and perivascular fibrosis were more exaggerated in AT2 mice.18 It is known that receptor subtype redistribution occurs in LVH with AT1 subtype downregulation, resulting in marked increase of the proportion of AT2 receptor.19 This suggests a key modulating role for the AT2 receptor in the development of LVH. The clinical implication is that regression of hypertension induced LVH by AT1 receptor blockers may in part be caused by unopposed antigrowth effect of angiotensin II mediated via the AT2 receptor.20
The aim of our study was to evaluate the AT2 receptor gene polymorphism (1332 G/A) for an association with LVH in patients with systemic hypertension. LV mass is measured precisely using cardiac MRI.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
160 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP
100 mm Hg. We excluded patients with a history of valvular heart disease, previous myocardial infarcts, or arrhythmias. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the local ethics committee approved the study.
Imaging Methods
MRI studies were performed on a 1.5-Tesla Philips Intera CV MRI system equipped with Master gradients using a 5-element cardiac phased-array receiver coil and vectorcardiographic ECG synchronization; 10 to 14 short-axis slices, parallel to the mitral valve, covering the heart were acquired using a turbo gradient echo pulse sequence (repetition time=8.8 ms, echo time=5.2 ms, flip angle=35°).
Image analysis was performed off-line using commercially available analysis software (MASS; Medis, Leiden, the Netherlands). The LV mass was measured at end-diastole for each slice (Figure 1). In all data sets, one experienced observer manually traced the endocardial and epicardial contours of the LV. Two papillary muscles were outlined separately, excluded from the volume, and included in the mass. LV mass was calculated as LV mass=1.05x(epicardial volumeendocardial volume).
|
Laboratory Methods
After genomic DNA extraction, primers 5' AGA GAT CTG GTG CTA TTA CG 3' and 5' CAC TTG AAG ACT TAC TGG TTG 3' (Invitrogen) were used to amplify a 310-bp DNA fragment between intron 1 and exon 2 including the A/G polymorphism. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed at 95°C for 15 minutes to activate the AmpliTaq Gold enzyme (Applied Biosystems), followed by 35 cycles of: 95°C for 30 seconds, 42°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 45 seconds. The product (5 µL) was digested for >3 hours with 5 U of HYP 188 III (New England Biolabs), which cuts the G but not the A allele, then subjected to gel electrophoresis (2% agarose) for genotyping (Figure 2). The AT2 receptor G allele gives 2 fragments of 104 and 206 bp, and the AT2 receptor A allele yields a single undigested 310-bp fragment. Genotyping was found to be accurate when confirmed by direct DNA sequencing (BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit; ABI PRISM, 3100 Genetic Analyzer) for the first 35 patients (Figure 2).
|
Statistical Methods
A power calculation was used to calculate the sample size with 95% confidence (type I error rate=0.05) and 90% power to detect a 10 g/m2 difference in LV mass index between the means (with SD of the sample of 19 g/m2 for men and 9 g/m2 for women). The numbers required were 154 for men and 30 for women. The number of women was doubled (n=60) as heterozygous females were excluded from the analysis because of the inactivation of one of the X-chromosomes in females.
The results were analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS for Windows, version 11.0). Means and SDs were calculated for LV mass indexed to body surface area (BSA). LVH was defined as elevated LV mass index, based on the mean LV mass index for normal volunteers plus 2 SDs.21 Because angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are known to influence LV mass regression, we used the test of unpaired proportions to assess for a difference between the A_/AA and G_/GG genotypes (hemizygous males and homozygous females) in drug treatment. We used the Mann-Whitney test to assess for a difference between the means of the doses of those 2 drugs according to genotype. We also used the t test to investigate whether there was a difference in BP measurements between the 2 genotypes. The association of the G_/GG alleles with elevated LV mass index, as a continuous variable, was assessed using analysis of variance (1-way ANOVA).
2 Test was performed to compare the prevalence of A_/AA and G_/GG genotypes, for hemizygous males and homozygous females, based on the presence or absence of LVH.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The mean sitting BP for the patients group was 159/93 mm Hg. For those patients who had a 24-hour BP monitor (n=159), the group average of the mean 24-hour BP was 141/87 mm Hg. The group average of the daytime BP (based on the 24-hour BP recording) for the same 159 patients was 146/91 mm Hg. Differences in BP measurements between A_/AA and G_/GG genotypes were considered. The F test confirmed that there were no significant differences between the BP variances for the 2 genotypes. We then used the t test to test the hypothesis that there was no difference between the means (Table 2).
|
The mean LV mass indexed to body surface area (BSA) for the male healthy volunteers was 77.8±9.1 g/m2 (n=30) and for the female healthy volunteers was 61.5±7.5g/m2 (n=30).21 For the patients with hypertension, the mean LV mass indexed to BSA for the male patients was 94.3±19.6 g/m2 (n=125) and for the female patients was 71.2±12.0g/m2 (n=72). A 2-way ANOVA showed a difference in the mean LV mass according to gender and hypertension status (P<0.0001). Seventy-three (37.1%) patients had LVH (20; 27.8% of the female patients and 53; 42.4% of the male patients). The distribution of genotypes among the normal subjects and the subjects with hypertension with and without LVH was calculated (Figure 3).
|
We assessed LV mass index as a continuous variable using data from all subjects. When the A_/AA genotype (mean LV mass index=82.4±21.1 g/m2; n=123) were compared with the G_/GG genotype (mean LV mass index=88.1±19.0 g/m2; n=89), the ANOVA was statistically significant (P=0.044; 95% confidence interval for the difference in means was 11.3 g/m2 to 0.2 g/m2). For the female subjects, the mean LV mass index for AA genotype was 67.6±12.8 g (n=40), and for the GG genotype was 68.4±9.8 g (n=18). For the male subjects, the mean LV mass index for the A haplotype was 89.5±20.6 g (n=83) and for the G haplotype was 93.1±17.4 g (n=71).
2 Test was performed to assess the prevalence of A_/AA and G_/GG alleles between the subjects without LVH (normal volunteers and hypertensives without LVH) and the hypertensive patients with LVH. Heterozygous females were excluded from the analysis because of the inactivation of one of the X-chromosomes in females. The frequency of the G_/GG genotype was found to be higher in the hypertensive patients with LVH (P=0.031). The
2 test was repeated on the females and males separately with P=0.67 and P=0.058, respectively. The
2 test was also performed to assess the prevalence of A_/AA and G_/GG alleles between the normal volunteers and hypertensive patients with LVH. The frequency of the G_/GG genotype was found to be higher in hypertensive patients with LVH than it was for normal volunteers (P=0.023). When the
2 test was also performed to assess the prevalence of A_/AA and G_/GG alleles between the hypertensive patients without LVH and hypertensive patients with LVH, the frequency of the G_/GG genotype was found to be higher in the patients with LVH. (P=0.058) (Figure 3).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our patients all had systemic hypertension that was either previously diagnosed/treated (85.3%) or newly diagnosed/untreated (14.7%). Consequently, the severity of hypertension also varied within this group. We did not consider it either necessary or appropriate to stop antihypertensive medication for the purpose of this study. Continued use of antihypertensive drugs would be expected to have resulted in attenuation of LVH, the severity of which would, in any case, be expected to vary in this group of patients.25,26 Nevertheless, similar frequency of use of both ACE inhibitors and ARBs should have ensured that this was not a confounding factor in our observations. If the use of drugs acted as a confounding factor, the effect would have been to make an association between genotype and LV mass more difficult to detect.
We compared the A_/AA genotype (mean LV mass index=82.4±21.1 g/m2; n=123) to the G_/GG genotype (mean LV mass index=88.1±19.0 g/m2; n=89) by ANOVA and found a difference that was statistically significant (P=0.044). A comparison of subjects with LVH to the subjects without LVH revealed a significant excess of the G_/GG genotype (P=0.031). Furthermore, a comparison of the hypertensives with LVH to the normal volunteers revealed a significant excess of the G_/GG genotype (P=0.023). Additional evidence to support the biological validity of our observations is the trend (P=0.058) of excess G_/GG genotype among the hypertensives with LVH when compared with the hypertensives without LVH (Figure 3). Our findings suggest that the (1332 G) polymorphism of the AT2 receptor is associated with hypertension related LVH. The LVH observed was present despite the fact that the majority of the patients were using antihypertensive medications. This is of importance because LVH is associated with excess risk of morbidity and mortality. The AT2 receptor polymorphism might serve as a marker for patients who would benefit from a more aggressive control of BP and/or drugs that block the AT1 receptor that have been shown to improve outcomes.20,27
Previously, Schmieder et al studied LV mass as measured by M-mode echocardiography in 120 healthy male students with normal or mildly elevated BP, reporting an association between the AT2 receptor (+1675 A/G) polymorphism and LV mass.5 The overall allele frequency for this study was comparable to our own (A=57% and G=43%), with subjects being relatively unselected. An excess of the G allele was seen in students with a casual BP >140/90 mm Hg (A=54% and G 46%) as compared with those deemed to be normotensive (A=59% and G=41%). Given this reported trend toward, and association between, the G allele and the presence of hypertension, it is paradoxical that students in their study with the A genotype were reported to have higher LV mass. More recently, Herrmann et al investigated the polymorphism in 2 randomly sampled populations28 that were originally used to investigate the prevalence of LV dysfunction. Once again, there was an excess of the G allele among hypertensive men in both subgroups (hypertension, A=47.6% and G=52.4%; normotension, A=52.1% and G=47.9% and hypertension, A=44.9% and G=55.1%; normotension, A=48.7%and G=51.3%). They conclude that the results are not consistent across the cohort and recommended further research.29
Perspectives
Mutations located in noncoding regions, such as those affecting 5' and 3' splice sites or branch sites, are often the cause of hereditary disease.30 The AT2 receptor gene (1332 G/A) intronic polymorphism has been reported to be located at a lariat branch-point in intron 1. Differently spliced AT2 receptor mRNA species have already been described and shown to be biochemically functional.2 Elevated LV mass is associated with excess risk of morbidity and mortality. In a prospective study, we have observed a statistical association between the AT2 (1332 G) allele and the presence of LVH in patients with hypertension. Less effective transcription of the AT2 receptor gene, as a result of the (1332 G) polymorphism might be expected to result in reduced AT2 receptor mediated effects in patients with the G allele.2 Our results are therefore in keeping with the hypothesis that the AT2 receptor counteracts the myocardial growth promoting effects of the AT1 receptor.14 The AT2 receptor polymorphism might serve as a marker for patients who would benefit from a more aggressive control of BP and/or drugs that block the AT1 receptor, either ARBs or ACE inhibitors, because they have been shown to improve outcomes.20,27
Received December 24, 2003; first decision January 22, 2004; accepted March 15, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Nishimura H, Yerkes E, Hohenfellner K, Miyazaki Y, Ma J, Hunley TE, Yoshida H, Ichiki T, Threadgill D, Phillips JA, Hogan BM, Fogo A, Brock JW, Inagami T, Ichikawa I. Role of the angiotensin type 2 receptor gene in congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, CAKUT, of mice and men. Mol Cell. 1999; 3: 110.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Erdmann J, Guse M, Kallisch H, Fleck E, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Novel intronic polymorphism (+1675G/A) in the human angiotensin II subtype 2 receptor gene. Hum Mutat. 2000; 15: 487.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Warnecke C, Willich T, Holzmeister J, Bottari SP, Fleck E, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Efficient transcription of the human angiotensin II type 2 receptor gene requires intronic sequence elements. Biochem J. 1999; 340: 1724.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Schmieder RE, Erdmann J, Delles C, Jacobi J, Fleck E, Hilgers K, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Effect of the angiotensin II type 2-receptor gene (+1675 G/A) on left ventricular structure in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 175182.
6. Salcedo EE, Gockowski K, Tarazi RC. Left ventricular mass and wall thickness in hypertension. Comparison of M mode and two-dimensional echocardiography in two experimental models. Am J Cardiol. 1979; 44: 936940.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Missouris CG, Forbat SM, Singer DR, Markandu ND, Underwood R, MacGregor GA. Echocardiography overestimates left ventricular mass: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens. 1996; 14: 10051010.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Myerson SG, Montgomery HE, World MJ, Pennell DJ. Left ventricular mass: reliability of M-mode and 2-dimensional echocardiographic formulas. Hypertension. 2002; 40: 673678.
9. Myerson G, Montgomery HE, Whittingham M, Jubb M, World M, Humphries S, Pennell DJ. Left ventricular hypertrophy with exercise and ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism, a randomised controlled trial with losartan. Circulation. 2001; 103: 226230.
10. Jamshidi Y, Montgomery HE, Hense HW, Myerson SG, Torra IP, Staels B, World MJ, Doering A, Erdmann J, Hengstenberg C, Humphries SE, Schunkert H, Flavell DM. Peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor alpha gene regulates left ventricular growth in response to exercise and hypertension. Circulation. 2002; 105: 950955.
11. Myerson SG, Bellenger NG, Pennell DJ. Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 750755.
12. Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Collins P, Klein HU, Pennell DJ. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90: 2934.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Inagami T, Eguchi S, Numaguchi K, Motley ED, Tang H, Matsumoto T, Yamakawa T. Cross-talk between angiotensin II receptors and the tyrosine kinases and phosphatases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10: S57S61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Yamada T, Akishita M, Pollman MJ, Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ, Horiuchi M. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis and antagonizes angiotensin II type 1 receptor action: an in vitro gene transfer study. Life Sci. 1998; 63: PL289PL295.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. van Kesteren CA, van Heugten HA, Lamers JM, Saxena PR, Schalekamp MA, Danser AH. Angiotensin II-mediated growth and antigrowth effects in cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997; 29: 21472157.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Senbonmatsu T, Ichihara S, Price E, Jr., Gaffney FA, Inagami T. Evidence for angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated cardiac myocyte enlargement during in vivo pressure overload. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: R25R29.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Ichihara S, Senbonmatsu T, Price E, Jr., Ichiki T, Gaffney A, Inagami T. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor is essential for left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis in chronic angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Circulation. 2001: 346351.
18. Wu L, Iwai M, Nakagami H, Chen R, Suzuki J, Akishita M, de Gasparo M, Horiuchi M. Effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on cardiac remodeling in angiotensin II type 2 receptor null mice. Arterioscl Thromb Vas. 2002; 22: 4954.
19. Lopez JJ, Lorell BH, Ingelfinger JR, Weinberg EO, Schunkert H, Diamant D, Tang SS. Distribution and function of cardiac angiotensin AT1- and AT2-receptor subtypes in hypertrophied rat hearts. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: H844H852.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Beevers G, Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Ibsen H, Kristiansson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Lindholm LH, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H, The LSG. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002; 359: 9951003.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Alfakih K, Plein S, Thiele H, Jones T, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU. Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003; 17: 323329.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Katz J, Milliken MC, Stray-Gundersen J, Buja LM, Parkey RW, Mitchell JH, Peshock RM. Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988; 169: 495498.
23. Germain P, Roul G, Kastler B, Mossard JM, Bareiss P, Sacrez A. Inter-study variability in left ventricular mass measurement. Comparison between M-mode echography and MRI. Eur Heart J. 1992; 13: 10111019.
24. Bottini PB, Carr AA, Prisant LM, Flickinger FW, Allison JD, Gottdiener JS. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient. Am J Hypertens. 1995; 8: 221228.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Dahlof B, Pennert K, Hansson L. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. A metaanalysis of 109 treatment studies. Am J Hypertens. 1992; 5: 95110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Devereux RB, Palmieri V, Liu JE, Wachtell K, Bella JN, Boman K, Gerdts E, Nieminen MS, Papademetriou V, Dahlof B. Progressive hypertrophy regression with sustained pressure reduction in hypertension: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction study. J Hypertens. 2002; 20: 14451450.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Mathew J, Sleight P, Lonn E, Johnstone D, Pogue J, Yi Q, Bosch J, Sussex B, Probstfield J, Yusuf S, Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation. Reduction of cardiovascular risk by regression of electrocardiographic markers of left ventricular hypertrophy by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril. Circulation. 2001; 104: 16151621.
28. McDonagh TA, Morrison CE, Lawrence A, Ford I, Tunstall-Pedoe H, McMurray JJ, Dargie HJ. Symptomatic and asymptomatic left-ventricular systolic dysfunction in an urban population. Lancet. 1997; 350: 829833.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Herrmann SM, Nicaud V, Schmidt-Petersen K, Pfeifer J, Erdmann J, McDonagh T, Dargie HJ, Paul M, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor gene polymorphism and cardiovascular phenotypes: the GLAECO and GLAOLD studies. Eur J Heart Failure. 2002; 4: 707712.
30. Krawczak M, Reiss J, Cooper DN. The mutational spectrum of single base-pair substitutions in mRNA splice junctions of human genes: causes and consequences. Hum Genet. 1992; 90: 4154.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Su, L. Lee, X. Li, J. Lv, Y. Hu, S. Zhan, W. Cao, L. Mei, Y.-M. Tang, D. Wang, et al. Association Between Angiotensinogen, Angiotensin II Receptor Genes, and Blood Pressure Response to an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Circulation, February 13, 2007; 115(6): 725 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Matteucci, E. Wuhl, S. Picca, A. Mastrostefano, G. Rinelli, C. Romano, G. Rizzoni, O. Mehls, G. de Simone, F. Schaefer, et al. Left Ventricular Geometry in Children with Mild to Moderate Chronic Renal Insufficiency J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 218 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Warnecke, P. Mugrauer, D. Surder, J. Erdmann, C. Schubert, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek Intronic ANG II type 2 receptor gene polymorphism 1675 G/A modulates receptor protein expression but not mRNA splicing Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1729 - R1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Baudin Polymorphism in angiotensin II receptor genes and hypertension Exp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 90(3): 277 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Booz Putting the Brakes on Cardiac Hypertrophy: Exploiting the NO-cGMP Counter-Regulatory System Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): 341 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |