| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2004;44:134.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc (G.F.M., E.W.), Holliston, Mass; Department of Mathematics and Statistics (H.P.), Evans Department of Medicine (J.A.V., J.F.K., R.S.V., E.J.B.), Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute (J.A.V., J.F.K., R.S.V., E.J.B.), and Section of Preventive Medicine (M.G.L., R.S.V., E.J.B.), Boston University School of Medicine, Mass; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Framingham Study (M.G.L., M.J.K., D.L., R.S.V., E.J.B.), Mass.
Correspondence to Gary F. Mitchell, MD, Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc, 327 Fiske St, Holliston, MA 01746. E-mail GaryFMitchell{at}mindspring.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endothelium microcirculation risk factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reactive hyperemia largely reflects dilation of resistance vessels by ischemia-induced production of vasodilators including NO.8 Although not widely appreciated, some studies have demonstrated a reduction in reactive hyperemia in patients with CRFs9,10 or coronary artery disease.7 Because reactive hyperemia is the stimulus, we hypothesized that reduced FMD in the presence of CRFs could reflect diminished stimulus rather than a local abnormality of the brachial artery endothelium. The relative degree of impairment of conduit and resistance vessel vasodilator function determines the net response of the conduit artery and may have physiological and prognostic implications.11 To better define the interrelations of systemic CRFs, FMD, and local SS, we performed ultrasound measurements of the flow and diameter responses to forearm cuff occlusion in a large, well-characterized community-based cohort.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ultrasound Data Acquisition
The brachial artery images and Doppler flow were assessed with a Toshiba SSH-140A ultrasound system and 7.5-MHz linear array transducer before and after arterial flow was interrupted for 5 minutes by a cuff placed on the proximal forearm.12 Using a carrier frequency of 3.75 MHz and an insonation angle of
60°, Doppler flow was assessed at baseline and for the initial 15 seconds after cuff deflation to document baseline and peak hyperemic flow.6 All flow values were corrected for actual insonation angle.
Image and Flow Analyses
Brachial artery baseline (DBL) and 60-second postdeflation diameter (DDF) were measured as described previously.12 FMD was expressed as relative change from baseline: FMD%=(DDFDBL)/DBL.
Flows were analyzed from the digitized audio data using a semiautomated signal-averaging approach.13 Sonographers analyzed diameters, and on a separate occasion, measured flows with no knowledge of clinical status or the corresponding FMD%. Raw flow spectra were displayed and cardiac cycles with artifacts were excluded by the sonographer. During hyperemia, peak flow timing was confirmed visually, and only beats representing the peak flow response were included in the signal-averaged spectrum. Flow spectra were then signal averaged (1000-Hz resolution) using the ECG as a fiducial point. The pulsatile flow velocity waveform for the signal-averaged cardiac cycle was established automatically by finding the median flow velocity at each point in the flow spectrum. Onset of diastole was defined from the timing of the dicrotic notch on a brachial pressure waveform obtained by tonometry just before FMD evaluation. The hyperemic mean flow ratio was calculated by dividing mean flow during hyperemia by mean flow at baseline. Flow velocity (V) was converted to local SS using the following equation: SSx=8xµxVx/DBL, where the subscript x indicated either baseline or hyperemia, and µ was viscosity of blood, which was assumed to be 0.035 dynexs/cm2. To assess reproducibility of flow measurement, flows were reanalyzed blindly in a random sample of 50 individuals. This approach assesses measurement but not biological variability in flow. Systolic, diastolic, and mean flows were highly reproducible at baseline and during deflation with a correlation of >0.98 for all paired comparisons. Measurement variability of brachial artery diameter and FMD has been reported previously12 and was comparable to reports from other laboratories.
Statistical Analysis
Baseline characteristics, FMD%, and flow variables were tabulated separately by sex. Values are presented as mean±SD except as noted. Regression was performed using the SAS REG procedure.14,15 Stepwise multivariable regression (with age and sex forced into the model) was used to select correlates of baseline brachial artery diameter and FMD% from the following covariates with P
0.10 for inclusion: mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse pressure, heart rate, diabetes, current cigarette smoking, smoking within 6 hours before the examination, total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index (BMI), glucose, hypertension treatment, lipid treatment, daily aspirin use, hormone replacement therapy, prevalent cardiovascular disease, and walk test. Two variables coded whether walk test was done before or after brachial reactivity versus not done. These variables entered models together or not at all. Models were repeated with shear or flow as an additional candidate. Regression coefficients were expressed per SD of the independent variables or for presence of a specified value (eg, female gender). Partial R2 values represent the change in R2 as each variable entered the model. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
In stepwise regression models, when no consideration was given to baseline or hyperemic SS or flow, several CRFs were related to FMD% (Table 3). Thus, increasing age, need for lipid-lowering medication, and higher MAP, pulse pressure, and BMI were associated with lower FMD%, whereas female gender, hormone replacement therapy, and higher heart rate were associated with higher FMD% (model R2=0.189; P<0.001; Table 3). When hyperemic DSS was considered as an additional covariate, relationships between CRFs and FMD% were weakened, whereas the overall model R2 improved (model R2=0.335; P<0.001; Table 3). The effects of age and MAP remained significant, indicating that FMD% was reduced with advancing age and higher MAP, even after considering variability in the flow response. However, effect sizes for age and MAP were reduced considerably (to one fourth and one half of their original values, respectively) when shear response was considered in the model. Sex was retained in the model by design but was no longer significant, whereas other CRFs either did not enter the model (BMI, pulse pressure, hormone replacement therapy, and heart rate) or were no longer significant (lipid-lowering therapy). In contrast, when the hyperemic mean flow ratio, which is the measure of flow used in most previous studies,6 was evaluated as a covariate rather than DSS, the model fit was only minimally changed (R2=0.194) relative to the model with no flow variable (R2=0.189), and all CRFs that appeared in the model without flow incorporated remained significant.
|
Because brachial artery diameter was included in the equations for FMD% and DSS, the possibility existed that the relationship between DSS and FMD% was predominantly mathematical rather than physiological. Therefore, we also evaluated models with actual change in brachial artery diameter (in millimeters) rather than FMD% as the dependent variable and hyperemic diastolic flow velocity rather than DSS as a potential covariate. Once again, when flow velocity was allowed to enter this model, the overall R2 improved (from 0.146 to 0.269), the change in R2 when flow entered the model was high (partial R2=0.165; P<0.001), and age (partial R2=0.095; P=0.006), sex (partial R2<0.001; P=0.028), and MAP (partial R2=0.007; P<0.001) were the only other significant correlates of diameter change.
We next evaluated correlates of baseline and hyperemic DSS and found relationships with several CRFs (Table 4). Increasing age and pulse pressure were associated with reductions in baseline and hyperemic DSS. Walk test before brachial testing was associated with higher baseline DSS. Higher BMI was associated with increased baseline but reduced hyperemic DSS. Higher MAP, prevalent CVD, prescribed antihypertensive treatment, and fasting glucose were associated with blunted hyperemic DSS, whereas female gender, hormone replacement therapy, and higher baseline DSS were associated with increased hyperemic DSS.
|
To determine whether the associations between hyperemic DSS and CRFs were affected by age or sex, we repeated the hyperemic DSS model separately for individuals above versus below the median age (60 years) and for men versus women. The results were substantially the same in each subgroup, with age, sex, baseline DSS, brachial pulse pressure, BMI, and MAP accounting for most of the variance in hyperemic DSS explained by the models.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several previous studies have reported that CRFs impair brachial artery FMD. For example, impaired FMD relates to older age, male gender, higher blood pressure, insulin resistance, obesity, smoking, and lipid abnormalities and inversely to estrogen therapy.16 We recently confirmed many of these associations in a large community-based sample.12 We have now shown that the relationships between FMD and CRFs may be secondary in part to the associations between CRFs and abnormal baseline and hyperemic flow and shear. Our results are consistent with a few studies that demonstrated impaired hyperemic flow responses in patients with CRFs9,10 or established coronary artery disease,7 including several that carefully measured flow changes using venous occlusion plethysmography.7,10 None of those studies examined flow and CRFs in the same multivariable model. Furthermore, most of the available studies demonstrated no significant effect of CRFs on hyperemic flow or ignored changes in flow completely. Many of the former studies that evaluated flow focused on the hyperemic mean flow ratio, a variable that correlated much less strongly with FMD% compared with diastolic flow or DSS (Table 2). Thus, our study differs from previous work because of the more careful assessment of flow, the particular attention to diastolic flow and DSS, and most important, because of the much larger sample size, which allowed us to construct multivariable models that simultaneously assessed the effects of CRFs and the stimulus for dilation.
The mechanisms accounting for impaired hyperemic flow in setting of CRFs remain uncertain. Reactive hyperemia is a complex response that reflects tissue production of a number of flow- and ischemia-induced vasodilators as well as direct myogenic responses.17 A portion of the hyperemic response can be inhibited by infusion of the NO synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), suggesting that NO plays a role that might be impaired by CRFs.8,10 In support of this possibility, a recent study demonstrated that hyperemic flow responses were impaired and inhibited to a lesser extent by L-NMMA in patients with hypertension compared with normotensive individuals.10 Hypertension and aging are associated with important structural changes in microvessels that may contribute to blunted reactive hyperemia. For example, histological studies demonstrate increased medial thickness and other evidence of microvascular hypertrophy in experimental animals18,19 and in elderly and hypertensive patients.20 Microvascular abnormalities related to insulin resistance have been described and include vascular rarefaction and abnormal capillary recruitment.21,22 Obesity-related microvascular dysfunction has also been described.23 Hypercholestolemia has been associated with reduced reactive hyperemia,9 and statin drugs have improved flow response.24 Interestingly, structural changes in the microcirculation correlate strongly with pulse pressure, suggesting that there may be links between CRFs, stiffness of the central aorta, and microvascular dysfunction.25
Our study had several interesting findings regarding baseline DSS. It was notable that DSS was low overall and, in fact, had a negative mean value in women. Age, pulse pressure, and prevalent cardiovascular disease were associated particularly with lower baseline DSS. These CRFs are known to be associated with increased stiffness of the aorta and preserved compliance of peripheral arteries, including the brachial artery.26 Thus, flow reversal may occur in muscular arteries of the arms and legs during diastole as the lower impedance vasculatures of the heart, brain, and internal organs are perfused with blood stored in the relatively compliant peripheral muscular arteries during systole.25
An important issue raised by the present study relates to the potential for atherosclerosis in the brachial artery. Despite the systemic nature of traditional CRFs, atherosclerosis has a predilection for branch points and other regions of disordered SS in the arterial tree.2 Investigators have attributed this observation to the impact of local SS on endothelial phenotype.1 In general, laminar SS, which is found in the brachial artery, has favorable effects, whereas stasis, turbulent shear, and local shear gradients activate endothelial cells and induce a proatherogenic phenotype that includes a loss of bioactive NO.1 If impaired brachial artery FMD indicated local endothelial dysfunction, one might expect that the brachial artery would be susceptible to atherosclerosis. In fact, clinically significant atherosclerosis is rare in the brachial artery, even in patients with advanced coronary or carotid atherosclerosis.27 Furthermore, in a previous in vitro study, endothelium-dependent dilation was intact in segments of radial artery (which is adjacent to the brachial artery) obtained from patients with advanced coronary artery disease.28 The present study may help clarify these apparent discrepancies because our data suggest that the observed reductions in hyperemia-induced FMD% in individuals with various CRFs are attributable largely to a reduction in the stimulus for dilation during hyperemia rather than impairment in local endothelial function in the brachial artery.
Our study has several limitations. For example, it remains possible that brachial artery responses to other endothelium-dependent agonists (eg, acetylcholine) are impaired by CRFs, as is the case in the coronary circulation.5 We have not examined the responses of the conduit brachial artery or forearm resistance vessels to nonendothelium-dependent dilators, although it is important to note that it is not possible to perform such a study in a large community-based setting. In addition, it is possible that the low hyperemic response observed in some participants is insufficient to differentiate the effects of CRFs on local endothelial function as reflected by FMD%. CRFs may be associated more strongly with DSS than FMD% because DSS can be measured with greater reproducibility. Finally, we used a fixed time window after cuff deflation to assess FMD%, which tends to underestimate FMD% because peak dilation timing is variable. These limitations are balanced by several strengths, including the large sample size, which allowed us to evaluate multivariable models with adequate power to detect even modest relationships between CRFs and FMD and the community-based cohort with routine assessment of brachial artery function and CRFs, which minimized potential selection bias. Our study underscores the need for quantitative assessment of flow and SS responses when interpreting brachial artery FMD data. Ultrasound-based study of FMD% is technically difficult and has substantial variability because of the limited resolution of currently available ultrasound systems. It is possible that studies of microvascular function, including evaluation of the hyperemic flow response may provide more reproducible and useful information.10 Our data suggest that it would be reasonable for all cross-sectional and intervention studies of brachial FMD% to consider including the SS or flow response as a covariate in statistical models. Furthermore, examination of the actual level of mean or DSS or diastolic flow during hyperemia is preferable to hyperemic-to-baseline ratios because the presence of low baseline flows in the denominator renders such ratios unstable and may obscure the relationship between flow stimulus and FMD% response.
Perspectives
Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that many CRFs impair brachial artery FMD by reducing the hyperemic stimulus for dilation rather than by impairing endothelial function in the conduit brachial artery. We have shown that variations in baseline and evoked SS were related closely to conventional CRFs, including independent contributions from mean and pulse pressure, obesity, and fasting glucose. These findings have important implications for future studies that examine brachial artery endothelial function and emphasize the need to consider the flow and SS response when interpreting the brachial dilatory response. In addition, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that local SS plays the predominant role in determining local endothelial function and, by inference, risk for local atherosclerotic lesion development, despite the presence of systemic CRFs.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 21, 2004; first decision February 10, 2004; accepted May 19, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1999; 282: 20352042.
3. Vita JA, Treasure CB, Ganz P, Cox DA, Fish RD, Selwyn AP. Control of shear stress in the epicardial coronary arteries of humans: impairment by atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 14: 11931199.[Abstract]
4. Cox DA, Vita JA, Treasure CB, Fish RD, Alexander RW, Ganz P, Selwyn AP. Atherosclerosis impairs flow-mediated dilation of coronary arteries in humans. Circulation. 1989; 80: 458465.
5. Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschlager H, Just H. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone in humans. Progressive endothelial dysfunction with different early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1991; 83: 391401.
6. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, Celermajer D, Charbonneau F, Creager MA, Deanfield J, Drexler H, Gerhard-Herman M, Herrington D, Vallance P, Vita J, Vogel R. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 257265.
7. Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC, Creager MA. Flow-induced vasodilation of the human brachial artery is impaired in patients <40 years of age with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 12101214.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Meredith IT, Currie KE, Anderson TJ, Roddy MA, Ganz P, Creager MA. Postischemic vasodilation in human forearm is dependent on endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: H1435H1440.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Hayoz D, Weber R, Rutschmann B, Darioli R, Burnier M, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Postischemic blood flow response in hypercholesterolemic patients. Hypertension. 1995; 26: 497502.
10. Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Nakagawa K, Matsuura H, Kajiyama G, Oshima T. A noninvasive measurement of reactive hyperemia that can be used to assess resistance artery endothelial function in humans. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 121125.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Vita JA, Keaney JF Jr. Endothelial function: a barometer for cardiovascular risk? Circulation. 2002; 106: 640642.
12. Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Mitchell GF, Vasan RS, Keaney JF Jr, Lehman BT, Fan S, Osypiuk E, Vita JA. Clinical correlates and heritability of flow-mediated dilation in the community: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004; 109: 613619.
13. Mitchell GF, Tardif JC, Arnold JM, Marchiori G, OBrien TX, Dunlap ME, Pfeffer MA. Pulsatile hemodynamics in congestive heart failure. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 14331439.
14. Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied Regression Analyses and other Multivariable Methods. Boston, Mass: PWS-Kent Publishing Co.; 1988.
15. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT Users Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1999.
16. Gokce N, Vita JA. Clinical manifestations of endothelial dysfunction. In: Loscalzo J, Schafer AI, eds. Thrombosis and Hemorrhage. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2002: 685706.
17. Loscalzo J, Vita JA. Ischemia, hyperemia, exercise, and nitric oxide. Complex physiology and complex molecular adaptations. Circulation. 1994; 90: 25562559.
18. Baumbach GL, Siems JE, Heistad DD. Effects of local reduction in pressure on distensibility and composition of cerebral arterioles. Circ Res. 1991; 68: 338351.
19. Christensen KL. Reducing pulse pressure in hypertension may normalize small artery structure. Hypertension. 1991; 18: 722727.
20. James MA, Watt PA, Potter JF, Thurston H, Swales JD. Pulse pressure and resistance artery structure in the elderly. Hypertension. 1995; 26: 301306.
21. Serne EH, Stehouwer CD, ter Maaten JC, ter Wee PM, Rauwerda JA, Donker AJ, Gans RO. Microvascular function relates to insulin sensitivity and blood pressure in normal subjects. Circulation. 1999; 99: 896902.
22. Caballero AE, Arora S, Saouaf R, Lim SC, Smakowski P, Park JY, King GL, LoGerfo FW, Horton ES, Veves A. Microvascular and macrovascular reactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 1999; 48: 18561862.[Abstract]
23. Shimabukuro M, Higa N, Asahi T, Oshiro Y, Takasu N, Tagawa T, Ueda S, Shimomura I, Funahashi T, Matsuzawa Y. Hypoadiponectinemia is closely linked to endothelial dysfunction in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 88: 32363240.
24. Binggeli C, Spieker LE, Corti R, Sudano I, Stojanovic V, Hayoz D, Luscher TF, Noll G. Statins enhance postischemic hyperemia in the skin circulation of hypercholesterolemic patients: a monitoring test of endothelial dysfunction for clinical practice? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 7177.
25. Mitchell GF. Pulse pressure, arterial compliance and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1999; 8: 335342.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. van der Heijden-Spek JJ, Staessen JA, Fagard RH, Hoeks AP, Boudier HA, van Bortel LM. Effect of age on brachial artery wall properties differs from the aorta and is gender dependent: a population study. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 637642.
27. Sorensen KE, Kristensen IB, Celermajer DS. Atherosclerosis in the human brachial artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 318322.[Abstract]
28. Shapira OM, Xu A, Aldea GS, Vita JA, Shemin RJ, Keaney JF Jr. Enhanced nitric oxide-mediated vascular relaxation in radial artery compared with internal mammary artery or saphenous vein. Circulation. 1999; 100: II322II327.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. A Chami, M. J Keyes, J. A Vita, G. F Mitchell, M. G Larson, S. Fan, R. S Vasan, G. T O'Connor, E. J Benjamin, and D. J Gottlieb Brachial artery diameter, blood flow and flow-mediated dilation in sleep-disordered breathing Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2009; 14(4): 351 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Parker, T. L. Trehearn, and J. R. Meendering Pick your Poiseuille: normalizing the shear stimulus in studies of flow-mediated dilation J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2009; 107(4): 1357 - 1359. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Wong, G. Simmons, C. Bopp, J. Yeboah, D. P. Casey, C. Austin, H. Tanaka, A. E. DeVan, J. N. Barnes, G. Atkinson, et al. Commentaries on Viewpoint: Pick your Poiseuille: Normalizing the shear stimulus in studies of flow-mediated dilation J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2009; 107(4): 1360 - 1365. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Chung, N. M. Hamburg, M. Holbrook, S. M. Shenouda, M. M. Dohadwala, D. F. Terry, N. Gokce, and J. A. Vita The Brachial Artery Remodels to Maintain Local Shear Stress Despite the Presence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 606 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Bjarnegard, H. J Arnqvist, T.;r. Lindstro;m, L. Jonasson, and T. Lanne Long-term hyperglycaemia impairs vascular smooth muscle cell function in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, January 1, 2009; 6(1): 25 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. J. Thijssen, L. M. Bullens, M. M. van Bemmel, E. A. Dawson, N. Hopkins, T. M. Tinken, M. A. Black, M. T. E. Hopman, N. T. Cable, and D. J. Green Does arterial shear explain the magnitude of flow-mediated dilation?: a comparison between young and older humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): H57 - H64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Widlansky Shear stress and flow-mediated dilation: all shear responses are not created equally Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): H31 - H32. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Galarraga, F. Khan, P. Kumar, T. Pullar, and J. J. F. Belch C-reactive protein: the underlying cause of microvascular dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology, December 1, 2008; 47(12): 1780 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M Title, E. Lonn, F. Charbonneau, M. Fung, K. J Mather, S. Verma, and T. J Anderson Relationship between brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation, hyperemic shear stress, and the metabolic syndrome Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2008; 13(4): 263 - 270. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Mitchell Effects of central arterial aging on the structure and function of the peripheral vasculature: implications for end-organ damage J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2008; 105(5): 1652 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dhindsa, S. M. Sommerlad, A. E. DeVan, J. N. Barnes, J. Sugawara, O. Ley, and H. Tanaka Interrelationships among noninvasive measures of postischemic macro- and microvascular reactivity J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 427 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Pyke, J. A. Hartnett, and M. E. Tschakovsky Are the dynamic response characteristics of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation sensitive to the magnitude of increase in shear stimulus? J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 282 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Vita, M. Holbrook, J. Palmisano, S. M. Shenouda, W. B. Chung, N. M. Hamburg, B. R. Eskenazi, L. Joseph, and O. M. Shapira Flow-Induced Arterial Remodeling Relates to Endothelial Function in the Human Forearm Circulation, June 17, 2008; 117(24): 3126 - 3133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bekelis and N. Labropoulos Huang AL, Silver AE, Shvenke E, et al. Predictive value of reactive hyperemia for cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing vascular surgery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007; 27:2113-2119 Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2008; 20(2): 224 - 226. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S A Wright, F M O'Prey, M T McHenry, W J Leahey, A B Devine, E M Duffy, D G Johnston, M B Finch, A L Bell, and G E McVeigh A randomised interventional trial of {omega}-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids on endothelial function and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2008; 67(6): 841 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Malik, V. Kondragunta, and I. J. Kullo Forearm Vascular Reactivity and Arterial Stiffness in Asymptomatic Adults From the Community Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1512 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Hamburg, M. J. Keyes, M. G. Larson, R. S. Vasan, R. Schnabel, M. M. Pryde, G. F. Mitchell, J. Sheffy, J. A. Vita, and E. J. Benjamin Cross-Sectional Relations of Digital Vascular Function to Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Framingham Heart Study Circulation, May 13, 2008; 117(19): 2467 - 2474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Calderaro, M. C. Monachini, C. L.Z. Vieira, P. C. Yu, D. M. Gualandro, A. C. Marques, and B. Caramelli Reactive Hyperemia Revisited Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2008; 28(4): e23 - e24. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Hamburg, C. J. McMackin, A. L. Huang, S. M. Shenouda, M. E. Widlansky, E. Schulz, N. Gokce, N. B. Ruderman, J. F. Keaney Jr, and J. A. Vita Physical Inactivity Rapidly Induces Insulin Resistance and Microvascular Dysfunction in Healthy Volunteers Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2007; 27(12): 2650 - 2656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Philpott and T. J. Anderson Reactive Hyperemia and Cardiovascular Risk Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2007; 27(10): 2065 - 2067. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Rassaf, T. Lauer, C. Heiss, J. Balzer, S. Mangold, T. Leyendecker, J. Rottler, C. Drexhage, C. Meyer, and M. Kelm Nitric oxide synthase-derived plasma nitrite predicts exercise capacity Br. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 41(10): 669 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Huang, A. E. Silver, E. Shvenke, D. W. Schopfer, E. Jahangir, M. A. Titas, A. Shpilman, J. O. Menzoian, M. T. Watkins, J. D. Raffetto, et al. Predictive Value of Reactive Hyperemia for Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing Vascular Surgery Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2007; 27(10): 2113 - 2119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Nishiyama, D. Walter Wray, K. Berkstresser, M. Ramaswamy, and R. S. Richardson Limb-specific differences in flow-mediated dilation: the role of shear rate J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 843 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Anderson Prognostic Significance of Brachial Flow-Mediated Vasodilation Circulation, May 8, 2007; 115(18): 2373 - 2375. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. Kullo and A. R. Malik Arterial Ultrasonography and Tonometry as Adjuncts to Cardiovascular Risk Stratification J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2007; 49(13): 1413 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Pyke and M. E. Tschakovsky Peak vs. total reactive hyperemia: which determines the magnitude of flow-mediated dilation? J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1510 - 1519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Silber, J. A.C. Lima, D. A. Bluemke, B. C. Astor, S. N. Gupta, T. K. Foo, and P. Ouyang Arterial Reactivity in Lower Extremities Is Progressively Reduced as Cardiovascular Risk Factors Increase: Comparison With Upper Extremities Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2007; 49(9): 939 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Gates, M. L. Boucher, A. E. Silver, K. D. Monahan, and D. R. Seals Impaired flow-mediated dilation with age is not explained by L-arginine bioavailability or endothelial asymmetric dimethylarginine protein expression J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2007; 102(1): 63 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Parker, S. J. Ridout, and D. N. Proctor Age and flow-mediated dilation: a comparison of dilatory responsiveness in the brachial and popliteal arteries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H3043 - H3049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Wright, F. M. O'Prey, D. J. Rea, R. D. Plumb, A. J. Gamble, W. J. Leahey, A. B. Devine, R. C. McGivern, D. G. Johnston, M. B. Finch, et al. Microcirculatory Hemodynamics and Endothelial Dysfunction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2006; 26(10): 2281 - 2287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pretnar-Oblak, M. Sabovic, M. Sebestjen, T. Pogacnik, and M. Zaletel Influence of Atorvastatin Treatment on L-Arginine Cerebrovascular Reactivity and Flow-Mediated Dilatation in Patients With Lacunar Infarctions Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2540 - 2545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Eskurza, Z. D. Kahn, and D. R. Seals Xanthine oxidase does not contribute to impaired peripheral conduit artery endothelium-dependent dilatation with ageing J. Physiol., March 15, 2006; 571(3): 661 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kathiresan, P. Gona, M. G. Larson, J. A. Vita, G. F. Mitchell, G. H. Tofler, D. Levy, C. Newton-Cheh, T. J. Wang, E. J. Benjamin, et al. Cross-Sectional Relations of Multiple Biomarkers From Distinct Biological Pathways to Brachial Artery Endothelial Function Circulation, February 21, 2006; 113(7): 938 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Naka, A. C. Tweddel, S. N. Doshi, J. Goodfellow, and A. H. Henderson Flow-mediated changes in pulse wave velocity: a new clinical measure of endothelial function Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2006; 27(3): 302 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Mitchell, J. A. Vita, M. G. Larson, H. Parise, M. J. Keyes, E. Warner, R. S. Vasan, D. Levy, and E. J. Benjamin Cross-Sectional Relations of Peripheral Microvascular Function, Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, and Aortic Stiffness: The Framingham Heart Study Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24): 3722 - 3728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Eskurza, L. A Myerburgh, Z. D Kahn, and D. R Seals Tetrahydrobiopterin augments endothelium-dependent dilatation in sedentary but not in habitually exercising older adults J. Physiol., November 1, 2005; 568(3): 1057 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kathiresan, M. G. Larson, R. S. Vasan, C.-Y. Guo, J. A. Vita, G. F. Mitchell, M. J. Keyes, C. Newton-Cheh, S. L. Musone, A. L. Lochner, et al. Common Genetic Variation at the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Locus and Relations to Brachial Artery Vasodilator Function in the Community Circulation, September 6, 2005; 112(10): 1419 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Moens, I. Goovaerts, M. J. Claeys, and C. J. Vrints Flow-Mediated Vasodilation: A Diagnostic Instrument, or an Experimental Tool? Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2254 - 2263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laclaustra, J. C. Kaski, A. F. Frangi, G. F. Mitchell, E. Warner, H. Parise, J. A. Vita, J. F. Keaney Jr, M. J. Keyes, D. Levy, et al. Flow-Mediated Dilation: Just a Marker of Local Shear Stress? * Response: Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): e11 - e12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Silber, P. Ouyang, D. A. Bluemke, S. N. Gupta, T. K. Foo, and J. A. C. Lima Why is flow-mediated dilation dependent on arterial size? Assessment of the shear stimulus using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): H822 - H828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Vita, J. F. Keaney Jr, M. G. Larson, M. J. Keyes, J. M. Massaro, I. Lipinska, B. T. Lehman, S. Fan, E. Osypiuk, P. W.F. Wilson, et al. Brachial Artery Vasodilator Function and Systemic Inflammation in the Framingham Offspring Study Circulation, December 7, 2004; 110(23): 3604 - 3609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. O'Rourke and W. W. Nichols Shear Stress and Flow-Mediated Dilation Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 119 - 120. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |