| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2004;44:191.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Departments of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (M.P., E. Faggin, E. Favaretto, B.B., M.R., A.C.P., P.P.), Pediatry (G.P.G.), and Biomedical Sciences (S.S.), University of Padova; and the Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (D.R., E.A.R.), University of Brescia, Italy.
Correspondence to Prof Paolo Pauletto, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Padova Medicina Interna I^, Ospedale CaFoncello, Via Ospedale 31100 Treviso, Italy. E-mail ppauletto{at}ulss.tv.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: muscle, smooth hypertension, arterial arterioles
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30 to 300 µm) are associated with hypertension.1,2 These alterations include a decreased luminal diameter and an increased medial thickness leading to an increased media-lumen ratio.35 The media-lumen ratio in microvessels can increase as a consequence of eutrophic remodeling (ie, a rearrangement of otherwise normal material around a narrowed lumen), or because of hypertrophic remodeling (either hypertrophy or hyperplasia of vascular smooth muscle cells).6,7 These processes would imply a profound change in the differentiation pattern of medial smooth muscle cells (SMCs)810 that has not yet been defined. Analysis of the expression of different myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoforms has identified, in rabbit and in human aorta, 3 maturation steps of SMCs: fetal, postnatal, and adult. In previous studies,8,9,11 we have shown that fetal-type SMCs coexpressed anti-smooth muscle (SM)1/2-MyHC, along with the 2 anti-nonmuscle (NM)-MyHC isoforms Apla1 and Apla2. Postnatal SMCs expressed SM1/2-MyHC and NM-MyHC Apla2. The adult-type SMC was characterized by the expression of SM-MyHC isoforms only. In adult rabbit aorta, 2 SMC populations have been identified: cells showing either the adult or the postnatal pattern, whereas in the prenatal period, fetal-type SMCs predominated. A similar picture was observed in the human aorta.11 The SMC phenotype has been reported to range in a continuum from "contractile SMCs" to "synthetic SMCs," according to a decreasing contractile capacity paralleled by an increasing capability of replicating and metabolizing proteins and lipoproteins. Taking into account the expression of our markers during development and in vascular disease,8,1012 the fetal-type SMCs of our nomenclature would overlap the synthetic SMC phenotype, whereas the adult-type would correspond to the contractile one. Accordingly, intimal SMC proliferation is accompanied by the expression of a fetal pattern of MyHC isoform and by a marked increase in the number of immature-type SMCs in the media underlying the atherosclerotic plaque.8,10,12,13
A previous study of microvessels (MVs) from heart and skeletal muscle of renovascular hypertensive rabbits showed that a prevalence of fetal-type SMC is present in this model, which is poorly influenced by raised blood pressure levels.9 Data on SMC differentiation in MVs of hypertensive subjects is lacking. Therefore, the goal of our study was to define the potential changes in SMC types of MVs (diameter range 30 to 300 µm) from human skeletal muscle of patients with essential hypertension and of children.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure
90 mm Hg).14 Exclusion criteria were secondary hypertension, diabetes mellitus, older than 74 or younger than 55 years. All hypertensive patients were being treated with calcium antagonists and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, except 1 who was taking ß-blockers. There was no difference between normotensive and hypertensive adults as far as demographic and anthropometric data are concerned, including total plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and glycemia. In our hypertensive subjects, the average blood pressure level was 150.6±15.5 mm Hg systolic and 85.9±7.8 mm Hg diastolic. Forty-nine skeletal muscle biopsies (rectus abdominis) were analyzed. Immediately after surgery, each sample was placed in an OCT compound (Tissue Tek), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at 80°C. Transverse cryosections (8 µm) of specimens were studied by immunocytochemistry using monoclonal antibodies. The following antibodies were used: SM-E7 SM-MyHC and NM-F6 NM-MyHC. SM-E7 binds selectively to SM-type MyHC 1 and 2 isoforms, whereas NM-F6 identifies a specific antigenic epitope localized in the platelet-type MyHC isoform MyHC-Apla1 and reacts neither with B-type NM-MyHC nor SM-MyHC.10 The combined reactivity to SM-E7 and NM-F6 antibodies identifies fetal-type SMCs, whereas reactivity to SM-E7 is typical of the entire SMC population independent of the phenotype.10
The number of MVs was assessed by SM-E7 staining. Moreover, we evaluated the number and relative percentage of MVs stained by NM-F6. Nuclei were revealed with the use of the bis-benzimide stain (Hoechst 33258). The number of MVs counted on each section was normalized according to the area unit (1 mm2). Measurements of MVs were carried out in blind on 3 sections per sample. Tissue masses were comparable among the 3 groups. Calculation of tissue area, as well as counting of MVs, was performed with a computerized image analysis system (Software QWIN, Leica Microsystem).
For statistical analysis, ANOVA plus Tukey post hoc test was used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The qualitative immunocytochemistry analysis by NM-F6 revealed 2 differentiation patterns of the media layer of MVs: positive or negative (Figure 2). Details of positive and negative vessels, respectively, are shown in Figure 3. Based on staining of nuclei, lack of reactivity to the NM-F6 antibody was not related to a decreased number of cells into the media layer because the same cell density was always observed by staining of nuclei (Figure 3). There was no correlation between positivity to the NM-F6 and the arterial diameter (not shown).
|
|
We also assessed the percentage of NM-F6 positive vessels per tissue area (Figure 1B). In hypertensive patients, there were many more NM-F6positive MVs compared with normotensive subjects (49.8±35.6% versus 24.4±21.1%, respectively, P=0.021). In specimens from children, the prevalence of NM-F6positive microvessels was close to that of hypertensive adults (50.6±12.6%).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study shows that the media layer of human MVs is heterogeneous in terms of SMC differentiation. In particular, an increase in MVs showing a prevalence of fetal-type SMCs takes place in hypertension, which resembles the pattern found in children. This would indicate that in hypertensive MVs a type of ontogenetic recapitulation occurs that would enable MVs to face the new environmental conditions dictated by high blood pressure and the subsequent need for wall remodeling via cell proliferation and collagen deposition. A different picture came out from the study of MVs in hypertensive rabbits,9 because in this animal model fetal-type SMCs predominate even in normotensive MVs from controls. This species-related difference is not surprising10,17 and may partly explain the peculiar time-course of experimental hypertension in these animals.
In agreement with previous studies,1820 a rarefaction in MVs was observed in specimens from hypertensive adults. A similar rarefaction has also been described during normal development and in the early stages of hypertension.20 Although both rarefaction and luminal narrowing play a key role in increasing vascular resistance and, hence, blood pressure level, their biological relationship remains elusive and deserves further studies. On the whole, our study demonstrates that hypertensive MVs are characterized by prevalence of fetal-type SMCs in the tunica media, which may serve as the biological basis for wall thickening and decreased luminal diameter. Unfortunately, it was not possible to investigate whether or not the prevalence of fetal-type SMCs was related to structural remodeling of MVs. In fact, under our experimental conditions (frozen muscle specimens), it was not possible to reliably assess the wall-to-lumen ratio. Apparently, there was no relationship between SMC phenotype and MV diameter. An appropriate approach to clarify this issue is to undertake specific studies on isolated MVs.
The changes we observed in MVs from hypertensive adults can play a pathophysiological role in the occurrence and maintenance of high blood pressure. Because changes in the differentiation pattern of SMCs precede cell proliferation and the achievement of new functional properties, we propose that antihypertensive drugs should also be evaluated in terms of their efficacy in preventing or reversing changes in the differentiation pattern of SMCs of MVs. In our series, a poor blood pressure control was present despite the antihypertensive medication with calcium antagonists and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. This implies that, under these conditions, the impact of high blood pressure on MVs cannot be reversed. On the other hand, the potential impact of different antihypertensive drugs should be specifically evaluated in controlled studies in hypertensive patients achieving a satisfactory blood pressure control.
In conclusion, this study shows for the first time that in the medial layer of MVs from hypertensive subjects an increase in fetal-type SMCs takes place, resembling that of children, along with vascular rarefaction. Several aspects remain to be investigated, particularly the extent and the time course of such changes in secondary hypertension.
Perspectives
By further investigating the modifications occurring in SMC phenotype of MVs from hypertensive patients, it will be possible to better understand the time course of changes in the biological adaptation to high blood pressure levels and hence, of the basic processes leading to MV remodeling. In fact, SMC rearrangement implies a previous change in phenotype, which would impact on several structural and functional properties of MV wall, including extracellular matrix production and expression of various molecules such as cytokines and growth factors. Moreover, it will be possible to shed a new light onto the impact of antihypertensive medication on the molecular properties of SMCs of the MV wall. The evaluation of the basic features that are upstream to changes in structure and function of MVs could also disclose a new opportunity to identify normotensive subjects who are potentially prone to rearrangement of the shape and the function of their MV wall before they become hypertensives.
Received January 28, 2004; first decision February 20, 2004; accepted May 18, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Mulvany MJ, Aalkjaer C. Structure and function of small arteries. Physiol Rev. 1990; 70: 921971.
3. Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Guelfi D, Piccoli A, Castellano M, Pasini G, Muiesan ML, Mulvany MJ, Agabiti Rosei E. Cellular hypertrophy in subcutaneous small arteries of patients with renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 931935.
4. Rizzoni D, Castellano M, Porteri E, Bettoni G, Muiesan ML, Agabiti Rosei E. Vascular structural and functional alterations before and after the development of hypertension in SHR. Am J Hypertens. 1994; 7: 193200.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Integan HD, Schiffrin EL. Structure and mechanical properties of resistence arteries in hypertension. Role of adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix determinants. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 312318.
6. Heagerty AM, Aalkjaer C, Bund SJ, Korsgaard N, Mulvany MJ. Small artery structure in hypertension: dual process of remodeling and growth. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 391397.
7. Mulvany MJ, Baumbach GL, Aalkjaer C, Heagerty AM, Korsgaard N, Schiffrin EL, Heistad DD. Vascular remodeling (letter). Hypertension. 1996; 28: 505506.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Pauletto P, Giuriato L, Scatena M, Chiavegato A, Sarzani R, Rappelli A, Dessi Fulgeri P, Pessina AC, Sartore S. Hyperplastic growth of aortic smooth muscle cells in renovascular hypertensive rabbits is accompanied by the expansion of an immature cell population. Circ Res. 1994; 74: 774788.
9. Pauletto P, Da Ros S, Capriani A, Chiavegato A, Pessina AC, Sartore S. Smooth muscle cell types at different aortic levels and in microvasculature of rabbits with renovascular hypertension. J Hypertens. 1995; 13: 16791685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Sartore S, Chiavegato A, Franch R, Faggin E, Pauletto P. Myosin gene expression and cell phenotypes in vascular smooth muscle during development, in experimental models, and in vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 12101215.
11. Frid MG, Printesva OY, Chiavegato A, Faggin E, Scatena M, Koteliansky VE, Pauletto P, Glukhova MA, Sartore S. Myosin heavy-chain isoform composition and distribution in developing and adult human aortic smooth muscle. J Vasc Res. 1993; 30: 279292.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Pauletto P, Puato M, Faggin E, Santipolo N, Pagliara V, Zoleo M, Deriu GP, Grego F, Plebani M, Sartore S, Bon GB, Heymes C, Samuel JL, Pessina AC. Specific cellular features of atheroma associated with development of neointima after carotid endarterectomy: the carotid atherosclerosis and restenosis study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 771778.
13. Sartore S, Scatena M, Chiavegato A, Faggin E, Giuriato L, Pauletto P. Myosin isoform expression in smooth muscle cells during physiological and pathological vascular remodeling. J Vasc Res. 1994; 31: 6181.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. 1999 World Health Organization International Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 151183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Owens GK. Regulation of differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Physiol Rev. 1995; 75: 487517.
16. Price RJ, Owens GK, Skalak TC. Immuhistochemical identification of arteriolar development using markers of smooth muscle differentiation. Circ Res. 1994; 75: 520527.
17. Sartore S, Chiavegato A, Faggin E, Franch R, Puato M, Ausoni S, Pauletto P. Contribution of adventitial fibroblasts to neointima formation and vascular remodeling: from innocent bystander to active participant. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 11111121.
18. Vicaut E. Microcirculation and arterial hypertension. Drugs. 59(Spec No 1): 110, 1999.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Struijker Boudier HAJ, le Noble JL, Messing MW, Huijberts MS, le Noble FA, van Hessen H. The microcirculation and hypertension. J Hypertens. 1992; 10 (Suppl 7): s147s156.
20. Levy B, Ambrosio G, Pries AR, Struijker Boudier HAJ. Microcirculation in hypertension. A new target for treatment? Circulation. 2001; 104: 735740.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S. Stump, M. T. Hamilton, and J. R. Sowers Effect of Antihypertensive Agents on the Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 796 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pauletto and M. Rattazzi Inflammation and hypertension: the search for a link Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 850 - 853. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |