Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2005;45:103-108
Published online before print November 29, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000150782.28485.91
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/1/103    most recent
01.HYP.0000150782.28485.91v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, F.
Right arrow Articles by Nasjletti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, F.
Right arrow Articles by Nasjletti, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Hazardous Substances DB
*PHENYLEPHRINE
*VASOPRESSIN
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Other Vascular biology

(Hypertension. 2005;45:103.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Decreased Levels of Cytochrome P450 2E1–Derived Eicosanoids Sensitize Renal Arteries to Constrictor Agonists in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

Fan Zhang; Huan Deng; Rowena Kemp; Harpreet Singh; Venkat Raj Gopal; John R. Falck; Michal Laniado-Schwartzman; Alberto Nasjletti

From the Department of Pharmacology (F.Z., H.D., R.K., H.S., M.L.-S., A.N.), New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY; and Departments of Biochemistry and Pharmacology (V.R.G., J.R.F.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas.

Correspondence to Alberto Nasjletti, MD, Department of Pharmacology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595. E-mail alberto_nasjletti{at}nymc.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We compared renal interlobar arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) in terms of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4A and CYP2E1 protein expression; levels of 20-HETE, 19-HETE, and 18-HETE; and responsiveness to phenylephrine in the absence and presence of N-methylsulfonyl-12,12-dibromododec-11-enamide (DDMS; 30 µmol/L), a CYP4A inhibitor. Relative to data in WKY, arteries of SHR exhibited diminished (P<0.05) CYP2E1 and levels of 19-HETE (66.7±6.0 versus 44.9±2.8 pmol/mg) and 18-HETE (13.8±1.6 versus 7.9±0.5 pmol/mg), whereas CYP4A and 20-HETE levels (99.3±9.1 versus 98.9±12.8 pmol/mg) were unchanged. Phenylephrine contracted vascular rings of SHR and WKY; the Rmax was similar in both strains, but SHR vessels were more sensitive as denoted by the lower (P<0.05) EC50 (0.28±0.07 versus 0.71±0.12 µmol/L). DDMS decreased 20-HETE and, to a lesser extent, 19-HETE, while increasing (P<0.05) the EC50 for phenylephrine by 475% and 54% in vessels of SHR and WKY, respectively. The desensitizing effect of DDMS was reversed by 20-HETE. Notably, the minimal concentration of 20-HETE that decreased the EC50 for phenylephrine in DDMS-treated vessels was smaller in SHR (0.1 µmol/L) than WKY (10 µmol/L), and the sensitizing effect of 20-HETE was blunted (P<0.05) by the (R) stereoisomers of 19-HETE and 18-HETE. We conclude that the increased sensitivity to phenylephrine in arteries of SHR is attributable to a vasoregulatory imbalance produced by a deficit in vascular CYP2E1-derived products, most likely 19(R)-HETE and 18(R)-HETE, which condition amplification of the sensitizing action of 20-HETE.


Key Words: rats, spontaneously hypertensive • vasoconstriction • kidney


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The kidney expresses cytochrome P450 (CYP) oxygenases, which catalyze monohydroxylation of arachidonic acid at positions C20, C19, and C18, yielding 20-HETE, 19-HETE, and 18-HETE, respectively.1,2 In the rat kidney, 20-HETE synthesis is attributable to CYP4A isoforms,1,3 19-HETE synthesis to CYP4A isoforms,1,3 and CYP2E12 and 18-HETE synthesis to CYP2E1.2 20-HETE produced by renal preglomerular vessels4,5 sensitizes vascular smooth muscle to constrictor agonists1,6,7 and contributes to pressure-induced vasoconstriction8 and tubuloglomerular feedback.9 20-HETE promotes vasoconstriction via mechanisms involving inhibition of Ca2+-activated K+ (KCa) channels,10,11 augmentation of Ca2+ channel conductance,12 and activation of Rho-kinase.13 Interestingly, 19-HETE was reported to interfere with 20-HETE–induced constriction of renal preglomerular vessels,14 and 19-HETE and the 18(R)-HETE were shown to produce renal vasodilation.15 Hence, the possibility arises that the vasoregulatory actions of 20-HETE are counterbalanced by those of 19-HETE and 18-HETE.

Arterial vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) are more sensitive to constrictor agonists than corresponding vessels of Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY).16–18 20-HETE is a critical determinant of the increased sensitivity to vasoconstrictors in SHR because interventions that decrease the expression or activity of CYP4A isoforms reduce the sensitivity of SHR vessels to constrictor agonists to a level not different from that of similarly treated WKY vessels.16,18

The present study examines the hypothesis that a deficit in vascular production of 19-HETE and 18-HETE in SHR facilitates the sensitizing action of 20-HETE on agonist-induced vasoconstriction and thus increases vascular reactivity of vascular.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Chemicals and Reagents
20-HETE, 19(S)-HETE, 19(R)-HETE, 18(S)-HETE, 18(R)-HETE, and the CYP4A inhibitor N-methylsulfonyl-12,12-dibromododec-11-enamide (DDMS)3 were synthesized as described.19 Antibodies directed against CYP2E1, CYP4A, and ß-actin were obtained from Gentest. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma.

Animals
Protocols using 10- to 12-week-old WKY and SHR (Taconic Farms) were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Blood pressure, measured by tail sphygmography, was 120±1 and 176±1 mm Hg (P<0.05) in WKY and SHR, respectively. Kidneys were excised from rats anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg IP), and the interlobar arteries were dissected out for assessment of CYP4A and CYP2E1 protein, measurement of 20-HETE, 19-HETE, and 18-HETE, and evaluation of agonist-induced vascular contraction.

Assessment of CYP4A and CYP2E1 Protein
Interlobar arteries were homogenized in ice-cold potassium phosphate buffer (10 mmol/L, pH 7.4) containing 250 mmol/L sucrose, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and 0.1 mmol/L PMSF. Homogenates were centrifuged (1000g for 10 minutes), and the supernatant was used for protein assay and separation of proteins by 12% SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blot analysis of CYP4A, CYP2E1, and ß-actin.5 Immunocomplexed bands were quantified by densitometric analysis. Data are expressed as the CYP4A or CYP2E1/ß-actin ratio.

HETE Assessment
Interlobar arteries were transferred into vials containing 1 mL of Krebs buffer saturated with 95% O2-5% CO2 and complemented with NADPH (1 mmol/L). Samples were incubated at 37° for 60 minutes; in some experiments, DDMS (30 µmol/L) or the CYP2E1 inhibitor diethyldithiocarbamate (DETC; 500 µmol/L)20 were included in the buffer. Because DETC inhibits Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) and extracellular SOD,21 the effect of DETC on vascular HETEs also was examined in vessels incubated in buffer containing the superoxide scavenger 4,5-dihydroxy-1,3-benzenedisulfonic acid (Tiron; 1 mmol/L). At the end of the incubation, media and vessels were extracted with acidified (pH 4.0) ethyl acetate, and the organic phase was processed for quantification of HETEs by negative chemical ionization mass spectroscopy.22

Assessment of Agonist-Induced Vascular Contraction
Interlobar arteries were cut into rings (2 mm in length) and mounted on 25-µm stainless-steel wires in the chambers of a myograph (J.P. Trading) for measurement of isometric tension.6 Rings were bathed in Krebs buffer and gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2. After a 30-minute equilibration interval, vessels were challenged with 80 mmol/L KCl, and after washing, concentration-response curves to phenylephrine (10–9 to 5x10–5 mol/L) or vasopressin (10–11 to 10–7 mol/L) were constructed in the absence and presence of test agents by cumulatively increasing the concentration of agonist every 2 to 3 minutes. Isometric tension is expressed in millinewtons per millimeter of vessel length (mN/mm).

Data Analysis
Data are expressed as means±SEM. Concentration-response data were fitted to a logistic function by nonlinear regression, and the maximum asymptote of the curves (Rmax) and concentration of phenylephrine producing 50% of the maximal response (EC50) were calculated as described.16 Concentration-response data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA, followed by a Duncan multiple range test. All other data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA or Student t test. The null hypothesis was rejected at P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Vascular Expression of CYP4A and CYP2E1 and Levels of 20-HETE, 19-HETE, and 18-HETE
The expression of CYP4A protein was comparable in interlobar arteries of WKY and SHR, whereas that of CYP2E1 protein was decreased (P<0.05) in arteries of SHR (Figure 1). Relative to data in interlobar arteries of WKY bathed in buffer without added drugs, arteries of SHR displayed similar levels of 20-HETE, whereas estimates of 19-HETE and 18-HETE were decreased (P<0.05; Figure 1). Values of 20-HETE in arteries of WKY and SHR were decreased (P<0.05) by DDMS (30 µmol/L) but were unaffected by DETC (500 µmol/L; Figure 1). 19-HETE estimates were reduced (P<0.05) by DDMS in arteries of SHR and by DETC in arteries of WKY and SHR (Figure 1). Estimates of vascular 18-HETE in WKY and SHR were unaffected by DDMS but were decreased (P<0.05) by DETC (Figure 1). In vessels incubated in buffer containing Tiron (1 mmol/L), to prevent superoxide accumulation, DETC also reduced (P<0.05) estimates of 19-HETE and 18-HETE, respectively, by 40.7±7.4% and 44.5±14.6% in WKY and by 49.1±5.9% and 58.3±9.3% in SHR, whereas estimates of 20-HETE were not affected significantly in WKY (–1.8±5.8%) or SHR (–7.7±9.4%).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Assessment of CYP4A and CYP2E1 expression by immunoblotting, and levels of 20-HETE, 19-HETE, and 18-HETE, in interlobar arteries of WKY and SHR. Representative immunoblots are shown (top); numbers under the blots (means±SEM of 6 experiments) are the ratio between the density of CYP4A or CYP2E1 bands and the corresponding ß-actin band. The bars (bottom) illustrate (mean±SEM) the level of HETEs in arteries incubated in buffer containing and not containing the CYP4A inhibitor DDMS (30 µmol/L) or the CYP2E1 inhibitor DETC (500 µmol/L). {dagger}P<0.05 relative to corresponding value in WKY; *P<0.05 relative to corresponding value in untreated vessels.

Effect of DDMS on Constrictor Responsiveness to Phenylephrine
Figure 2 illustrates the effect of phenylephrine on isometric tension in interlobar arteries of WKY and SHR, bathed in Krebs buffer containing and not containing DDMS (30 µmol/L). Phenylephrine elicited concentration-dependent isometric tension development in all experimental groups. The Rmax for phenylephrine was similar in vessels of WKY and SHR, in the absence and presence of DDMS. In preparations not exposed to the CYP4A inhibitor, the EC50 of phenylephrine in vessels of SHR was exceeded (P<0.05) by that in vessels of WKY (0.28±0.07 versus 0.71±0.12 µmol/L), implying enhanced sensitivity to the agonist. DDMS decreased the sensitivity of the vessels to phenylephrine, more so in SHR than in WKY, causing a rightward shift in the concentration-response curve and increasing (P<0.05) the EC50 for the constrictor agonist by {approx}54% and 475% in arteries of WKY and SHR, respectively. After treatment with DDMS, the EC50 for phenylephrine in vessels of WKY and SHR was comparable.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Concentration-response curves to phenylephrine in interlobar arteries of WKY (A) and SHR (B). Experiments were conducted in vessels bathed in buffer with (•) or without ({circ}) DDMS. Results are the mean±SEM. n=No. of experiments. *P<0.05 relative to data in vessels not exposed to DDMS.

Effect of 20-HETE, 19-HETE, and 18-HETE on Vascular Reactivity to Phenylephrine
Figure 3 shows data on the effect of 20-HETE on phenylephrine-induced contraction of interlobar arteries bathed in buffer containing DDMS (30 µmol/L). Exogenous 20-HETE increased the sensitivity of WKY and SHR vessels to the constrictor agonist, decreasing the EC50 without altering the Rmax. But the minimal concentration of exogenous 20-HETE that decreased the EC50 for phenylephrine was much smaller in vessels of SHR (0.1 µmol/L) than of WKY (10 µmol/L). Hence, vessels of SHR are more sensitive than vessels of WKY to 20-HETE–induced reduction of phenylephrine EC50. In contrast, arteries of WKY and SHR, bathed in buffer containing DDMS (30 µmol/L), did not differ from each other in terms of the effect of KCa channel blockade with tetraethylammonium (TEA) on phenylephrine-induced contractions. Exposure of WKY vessels to TEA at 10, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 µmol/L, respectively, decreased (P<0.05) the EC50 for phenylephrine from 1.12±0.03 (n=5) to 0.90±0.18, 0.63±0.13, 0.62±0.08, 0.65±0.07, and 0.40±0.09 µmol/L (n=5 at all concentrations of TEA). TEA also decreased (P<0.05) the EC50 for the constrictor agonist in SHR vessels, from 1.18±0.07 (n=5) to 0.87±0.11, 0.84±0.12, 0.64±0.18, 0.55±0.06, and 0.44±0.05 µmol/L (n=5 at all concentrations of TEA). TEA did not affect the Rmax for phenylephrine in vessels of WKY or SHR (data not shown).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of 20-HETE on constrictor responsiveness to phenylephrine in interlobar arteries bathed in buffer containing DDMS (30 µmol/L). The concentration of phenylephrine eliciting 50% of the maximal response (EC50) and the maximal contractile response to the agonist (Rmax) are shown in vessels of WKY ({circ}) and SHR (•). Results are the mean±SEM. n=No. of experiments. *P<0.05 relative to data in vessels not treated with 20-HETE.

The ability of 20-HETE to increase the sensitivity of DDMS-treated vessels to phenylephrine does not extend to 19(R)-HETE and 19(S)-HETE. We found that the EC50 for the constrictor agonist in DDMS-treated arteries of WKY (1.16±0.04 µmol/L; n=6) was not affected by 10 µmol/L 19(R)-HETE (1.22±0.09 µmol/L; n=6) or 19(S)-HETE (1.62±0.47 µmol/L; n=4). Neither was the EC50 for phenylephrine in DDMS-treated arteries of SHR (1.59±0.63 µmol/L; n=6) affected by 10 µmol/L 19(R)-HETE (1.70±0.34 µmol/L; n=6) or 19(S)-HETE (1.67±0.52 µmol/L; n=6). The Rmax for the constrictor agonist in DDMS-treated arteries of WKY was similar in the absence (4.47±0.18 mN/mm; n=6) and presence of 10 µmol/L 19(R)-HETE (4.81±0.40 mN/mm; n=5) or 19(S)-HETE (4.33±0.68 mN/mm; n=4). The Rmax for phenylephrine in DDMS-treated vessels of SHR also was similar in the absence (3.53±0.36 mN/mm; n=6) and presence of 10 µmol/L 19(R)-HETE (4.04±0.22 mN/mm; n=6) or 19(S)-HETE (3.48±0.43 mN/mm; n=6). Notably, as illustrated in Figure 4, in arteries of SHR bathed in buffer containing DDMS (30 µmol/L), the ability of exogenous 20-HETE to decrease the EC50 for phenylephrine was virtually blunted in preparations exposed to 19(R)-HETE or 18(R)-HETE but not to 19(S)-HETE or 18(S)-HETE (all at 1 µmol/L). The EC50 for phenylephrine in vessels of SHR (0.12±0.01 µmol/L; n=8), bathed in buffer containing DDMS (30 µmol/L) and 20-HETE (10 µmol/L), was increased (P<0.05), respectively, 541% (0.77±0.19 µmol/L); n=8) and 650% (0.90±0.10 µmol/L; n=8) by 0.1 and 1.0 µmol/L 19(R)-HETE and 366% (0.56±0.05 µmol/L; n=8) and 850% (1.14±0.24 µmol/L; n=8) by 0.1 and 1.0 µmol/L 18(R)-HETE. The EC50 for phenylephrine was not affected by 0.01 µmol/L 19(R)-HETE or 18(R)-HETE (0.17±0.02 and 0.13±0.04 µmol/L, respectively; n=8).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Contrasting effects of the (R) and (S) stereoisomers of 18-HETE and 19-HETE on 20-HETE–induced sensitization to phenylephrine in interlobar arteries bathed in buffer containing DDMS (30 µmol/L). The concentration of phenylephrine eliciting 50% of the maximal contractile response (EC50) is shown in SHR vessels exposed and not exposed to exogenous 20-HETE in the presence of 18(S)-HETE, 18(R)-HETE, 19(S)-HETE, or 19(R)-HETE. Results are the mean±SEM. n=No. of experiments. *P<0.05 relative to data in vessels not treated with 20-HETE.

19(R)-HETE and 18(R)-HETE also decrease the sensitivity to phenylephrine in settings in which 20-HETE synthesis is not impaired because both eicosanoids increased (P<0.05) the EC50 for phenylephrine in arteries of WKY and SHR not exposed to DDMS (Figure 5). On the other hand, neither the EC50 nor the Rmax for phenylephrine in arteries of WKY were affected by 10 µmol/L 19(S)-HETE (EC50 0.66±0.20 versus 0.65±0.26 µmol/L; Rmax 4.07±0.53 versus 4.22±0.69 mN/mm; n=6) or by 10 µmol/L 18(S)-HETE (EC50 0.30± 0.03 versus 0.37±0.09 µmol/L; Rmax 4.59±0.41 versus 3.74±0.43 mN/mm; n=4). Also, neither the EC50 nor the Rmax for phenylephrine in arteries of SHR was affected by 10 µmol/L 19(S)-HETE (EC50 0.22±0.03 versus 0.26±0.04 µmol/L; Rmax 3.90±0.40 versus 3.97±0.35 mN/mm; n=6) or by 10 µmol/L 18(S)-HETE (EC50 0.17±0.03 versus 0.11±0.02 µmol/L; Rmax 4.23±0.28 versus 4.33±0.10 mN/mm; n=4).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of 19(R)-HETE and 18(R)-HETE on constrictor responsiveness to phenylephrine in interlobar arteries of WKY ({circ}) and SHR (•). The concentration of phenylephrine eliciting 50% of the maximal response (EC50) and the maximal contractile response to the agonist (Rmax) are shown in vessels bathed in buffer containing and not containing 19(R)-HETE or 18(R)-HETE. Results are the mean±SEM. n=No. of experiments. *P<0.05 relative to data in vessels not exposed to 19(R)-HETE or 18(R)-HETE.

Constrictor Responsiveness to Vasopressin as Affected by DDMS and HETEs
Shown in Figure 6, in interlobar arteries not treated with DDMS (30 µmol/L), the EC50 for vasopressin-induced isometric tension development was smaller (P<0.05) in SHR compared with WKY, but the Rmax value did not differ significantly. DDMS caused a rightward shift in the concentration-response curve to vasopressin, increasing the (P<0.05) the EC50 by 191% and 1264% in renal arteries of WKY and SHR, respectively. In vessels exposed to DDMS, 20-HETE (10 µmol/L) caused a leftward shift in the concentration-response curve to vasopressin, decreasing the EC50 without altering the Rmax; the sensitizing effect of 20-HETE was blunted in vessels concurrently exposed to 19(R)-HETE or 18(R)-HETE (both at 1 µmol/L).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Concentration-response curve to vasopressin in interlobar arteries of WKY (top) and SHR (bottom). Experiments were conducted in vessels bathed in buffer without additions (control), with DDMS, with DDMS and 20-HETE, and with DDMS, 20-HETE, and either 19(R)-HETE or 18(R)-HETE in combination. Results are the mean±SEM. n=No. of experiments. *P<0.05 relative to data in control vessels not exposed to DDMS.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The salient conclusion derived from this study is that a vasoregulatory imbalance created by diminished production of CYP2E1-derived eicosanoids in arteries of SHR amplifies the sensitizing action of CYP4A-derived 20-HETE on agonist-induced vasoconstriction. The various components of this conclusion are discussed below.

Our study documents that 19-HETE and 18-HETE are lower in interlobar arteries of SHR than of WKY, in contrast to 20-HETE estimates, which are comparable in both strains. That DDMS decreases vascular 20-HETE is in line with reports that CYP4A isoforms are a primary determinant of the level and rate of production of 20-HETE in preglomerular vessels.5 On the other hand, the level of 18-HETE, unaffected by DDMS, was greatly decreased by an inhibitor of CYP2E1 (DETC) implying that vascular 18-HETE is a product of CYP2E1 activity. Levels of 19-HETE fell prominently in vessels treated with DETC and less so with DDMS, suggesting that synthesis of this eicosanoid proceeds through CYP2E1- and CYP4A-catalyzed reactions. Participation of CYP2E1 in the synthesis of 19-HETE and 18-HETE in the kidney was documented previously.2 It was reported that 70% and 30% of the 19-HETE synthesized by CYP2E1 corresponds to the (S) and (R) stereoisomers, respectively, whereas virtually all the 18-HETE corresponds to the (R) stereoisomer.2

According to this study, interlobar artery expression of CYP4A proteins is comparable in SHR and WKY, whereas CYP2E1 expression is diminished in SHR. Hence, reduction of 19-HETE and 18-HETE levels in renal arteries of SHR may be a consequence of diminished vascular expression of CYP2E1. Our study offers no information on the mechanism underlying downregulation of CYP2E1 in interlobar arteries of SHR.

In agreement with reports that the vasculature of SHR is hypersensitive to constrictor agonists,16–18 we found that interlobar arteries of SHR are more sensitive to phenylephrine- and vasopressin-induced contraction than corresponding arteries of WKY. That DDMS decreases the sensitivity or renal arteries to phenylephrine and vasopressin is in keeping with the notion that a CYP4A-derived eicosanoid of vascular origin sensitizes vascular smooth muscle to constrictor stimuli.16 The eicosanoid in question is likely 20-HETE because in contrast to 19(S)-HETE and 19(R)-HETE, it increases the sensitivity of DDMS-treated vessels to phenylephrine, offsetting the desensitizing effect of the CYP4A inhibitor. Notably, the loss of sensitivity to phenylephrine and vasopressin caused by DDMS in arteries of SHR greatly exceeds that in arteries of WKY, implying that the sensitizing mechanism mediated by 20-HETE is expressed more prominently in SHR than WKY. This conclusion concurs with the results of a previous study in mesenteric arteries of SHR and WKY.16

According to the present study, interlobar arteries of SHR do not display augmented CYP4A expression or 20-HETE levels. These observations prevent attribution of the increased expression of CYP4A-dependent sensitization to vasoconstrictors in SHR vessels to a mere elevation of vascular 20-HETE. Rather, it may be caused by facilitation of the vasoregulatory action of 20-HETE because the minimal concentration of 20-HETE that decreases the EC50 for phenylephrine is much smaller in vessels of SHR than of WKY. It is unlikely that facilitated responsiveness to 20-HETE in vessels of SHR relates to greater abundance of KCa channels,23 the putative cellular target of 20-HETE,1 because TEA was equally effective in sensitizing arteries of SHR and WKY to phenylephrine-induced contraction.

In our study, 19(R)-HETE and 18(R)-HETE prevented exogenous 20-HETE from sensitizing DDMS-treated arteries of SHR to phenylephrine and vasopressin. These eicosanoids also may interfere with the sensitizing action of endogenous 20-HETE because they rendered vessels not exposed to DDMS less sensitive to phenylephrine. It is unlikely that 19(R)-HETE and 18(R)-HETE desensitize vessels via a mechanism unrelated to 20-HETE because neither eicosanoid affected responsiveness to phenylephrine in DDMS-treated vessels not exposed to exogenous 20-HETE. That 19(S)-HETE and 18(S)-HETE do not share with corresponding (R) stereoisomers the ability to interfere with 20-HETE–induced vascular sensitization to phenylephrine suggests a high degree of specificity in the action of 19(R)-HETE and 18(R)-HETE. A priori, specific interference by these eicosanoids with the sensitizing action of 20-HETE may result from interactions at the level of a putative 20-HETE receptor or signaling pathway.1,14

That 19(R)-HETE and 18(R)-HETE interfere with the ability of 20-HETE to sensitize vascular smooth muscle to vasoconstrictors casts a special significance on the finding that interlobar arteries of SHR feature diminished CYP2E1 expression and levels of 19-HETE and 18-HETE. A deficit in vascular production of CYP2E1-derived 19(R)-HETE and 18(R)-HETE in SHR is expected to create a vasoregulatory imbalance that, as documented in the present study, sensitizes interlobar arteries to constrictor stimuli by facilitating the action of endogenous 20-HETE.

Perspectives
20-HETE was reported to promote renal and extrarenal vasoconstriction via amplification of constrictor mechanisms involving myogenic and neurohormonal stimuli.1 Accordingly, the vasoregulatory imbalance caused by a deficit in vascular generation of CYP2E1-derived eicosanoids in SHR may have far-reaching consequences on renal hemodynamics and blood pressure. In this regard, reports that interventions that decrease the expression or activity of CYP4A produce renal vasodilation and reduce blood pressure in SHR suggest involvement of 20-HETE in the implementation of renal vasoconstrictor and hypertensive mechanisms in this experimental model.24,25 The current study in SHR supports the notion that a deficit in vascular generation of CYP2E1-derived eicosanoids contributes to the hypertension by amplifying the vascular actions of 20-HETE.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by US public health grants HL-34300, HL-18579, DK-38226, and a grant from the Robert A. Welch Foundation. We thank Ms Jennifer Brown for secretarial assistance.

Received August 4, 2004; first decision August 20, 2004; accepted November 4, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Roman RJ. P-450 metabolites of arachidonic acid in the control of cardiovascular function. Physiol Rev. 2002; 82: 131–185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Laethem RM, Balazy M, Falck JR, Laethem CL, Koop DR. Formation of 19(S)-, 19(R)-, and 18(R)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids by alcohol-inducible cytochrome P450 2E1. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 12912–12918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Nguyen X, Wang MH, Reddy KM, Falck JR, Schwartzman ML. Kinetic profile of the rat CYP4A isoforms: arachidonic acid metabolism and isoform-specific inhibitors. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: R1691–R1700.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Imig JD, Zou AP, Stec DE, Harder DR, Falck JR, Roman RJ. Formation and actions of 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid in rat renal arterioles. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: R217–R227.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Wang MH, Guan H, Nguyen X, Zand BA, Nasjletti A, Laniado-Schwartzman M. Contribution of cytochrome P-450 4A1 and 4A2 to vascular 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid synthesis in rat kidneys. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: F246–F253.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Kaide J, Wang MH, Wang JS, Zhang F, Gopal VR, Falck JR, Nasjletti A, Laniado-Schwartzman M. Transfection of CYP4A1 cDNA increases vascular reactivity in renal interlobar arteries. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003; 284: F51–F56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Imig JD, Pham BT, LeBlanc EA, Reddy KM, Falck JR, Inscho EW. Cytochrome P450 and cyclooxygenase metabolites contribute to the endothelin-1 afferent arteriolar vasoconstrictor and calcium responses. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 307–312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Imig JD, Falck JR, Inscho EW. Contribution of cytochrome P450 epoxygenase and hydroxylase pathways to afferent arteriolar autoregulatory responsiveness. Br J Pharmacol. 1999; 127: 1399–1405.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Zou AP, Imig JD, Ortiz de Montellano PR, Sui Z, Falck JR, Roman RJ. Effect of P-450 omega-hydroxylase metabolites of arachidonic acid on tubuloglomerular feedback. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266: F934–F941.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Zou AP, Fleming JT, Falck JR, Jacobs ER, Gebremedhin D, Harder DR, Roman RJ. 20-HETE is an endogenous inhibitor of the large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K+ channel in renal arterioles. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: R228–R237.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Kaide J-I, Zhang F, Wei Y, Wang W, Gopal V, Falck J, Laniado-Schwartzman M, Nasjletti A. Vascular CO counterbalances the sensitizing influence of 20-HETE on agonist-induced vasoconstriction. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 210–216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Gebremedhin D, Lange AR, Narayanan J, Aebly MR, Jacobs ER, Harder DR. Cat cerebral arterial smooth muscle cells express cytochrome P450 4A2 enzyme and produce the vasoconstrictor 20-HETE which enhances L-type Ca2+ current. J Physiol. 1998; 507: 771–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Randriamboavonjy V, Busse R, Fleming I. 20-HETE-induced contraction of small coronary arteries depends on the activation of Rho-kinase. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 801–806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Alonso-Galicia M, Falck JR, Reddy KM, Roman RJ. 20-HETE agonists and antagonists in the renal circulation. Am J Physiol. 1999; 277: F790–F796.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Carroll MA, Balazy M, Margiotta P, Huang DD, Falck JR, McGiff JC. Cytochrome P-450-dependent HETEs: profile of biological activity and stimulation by vasoactive peptides. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: R863–R869.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Zhang F, Wang MH, Krishna UM, Falck JR, Laniado-Schwartzman M, Nasjletti A. Modulation by 20-HETE of phenylephrine-induced mesenteric artery contraction in spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 1311–1315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Touyz RM, Deng LY, Li JS, Schiffrin EL. Differential effects of vasopressin and endothelin-1 on vascular contractile and calcium responses in pressurized small arteries from spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1996; 14: 983–991.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Chu ZM, Croft KD, Kingsbury DA, Falck JR, Reddy KM, Beilin LJ. Cytochrome P450 metabolites of arachidonic acid may be important mediators in angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction in the rat mesentery in vivo. Clin Sci (Lond). 2000; 98: 277–282.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Falck JR, Belosludtsev Y, Kishta-Reddy KM-RK, Fiona-Shortt M, Chauhan K, Capdevila JH, Wei W. Eicosanoid biosynthesis: differential inhibition of cytochrome P450 epoxygenase and {omega}-hydroxylase. Bioorg Med Chem. 1997; 7: 3053–3056.

20. Brady JF, Xiao F, Wang MH, Li Y, Ning SM, Gapac JM, Yang CS. Effects of disulfiram on hepatic P450IIE1, other microsomal enzymes, and hepatotoxicity in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1991; 108: 366–373.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Andresen JJ, Faraci FM, Heistad DD. Vasomotor responses in MnSOD-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 287: H1141–H1148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Croft KD, McGiff JC, Sanchez-Mendoza A, Carroll MA. Angiotensin II releases 20-HETE from rat renal microvessels. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000; 279: F544–F551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Liu Y, Hudetz AG, Knaus HG, Rusch NJ. Increased expression of Ca2+-sensitive K+ channels in the cerebral microcirculation of genetically hypertensive rats: evidence for their protection against cerebral vasospasm. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 729–737.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Imig JD, Falck JR, Gebremedhin D, Harder DR, Roman RJ. Elevated renovascular tone in young spontaneously hypertensive rats. Role of cytochrome P-450. Hypertension. 1993; 22: 357–364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Xu F, Straub WO, Pak W, Su P, Maier KG, Yu M, Roman RJ, Ortiz de Montellano PR, Kroetz DL. Antihypertensive effect of mechanism-based inhibition of renal arachidonic acid omega-hydroxylase activity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002; 283: R710–R720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Cheng, J.-S. Ou, H. Singh, J. R. Falck, D. Narsimhaswamy, K. A. Pritchard Jr., and M. L. Schwartzman
20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid causes endothelial dysfunction via eNOS uncoupling
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H1018 - H1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
I. Fleming and R. Busse
Endothelium-Derived Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids and Vascular Function
Hypertension, April 1, 2006; 47(4): 629 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/1/103    most recent
01.HYP.0000150782.28485.91v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, F.
Right arrow Articles by Nasjletti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, F.
Right arrow Articles by Nasjletti, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Hazardous Substances DB
*PHENYLEPHRINE
*VASOPRESSIN
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Other Vascular biology