This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 45/1/64    most recent 01.HYP.0000150108.37527.57v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by de Simone, G. Articles by Devereux, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by de Simone, G. Articles by Devereux, R. B. Related Collections Clinical Studies Cardiac development Epidemiology Hypertrophy Echocardiography

(Hypertension. 2005;45:64.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

Evaluation of Concentric Left Ventricular Geometry in Humans

Evidence for Age-Related Systematic Underestimation

Giovanni de Simone; Stephen R. Daniels; Thomas R. Kimball; Mary J. Roman; Carmela Romano; Marcello Chinali; Maurizio Galderisi; Richard B. Devereux

From the Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (G.d.S., C.R., M.C., M.G.), Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy; Division of Cardiology (G.d.S., M.J.R., R.B.D.), The New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York; and the Children’s Hospital Medical Center (S.R.D., T.R.K.), Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Ohio.

Correspondence to Dr Giovanni de Simone, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University Hospital, via S. Pansini 5, Naples, Italy. E-mail simogi{at}unina.it

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
There might be limitations in identifying concentric left ventricular (LV) geometry by ratio of diastolic posterior wall thickness (WT_p) to cavity radius, defined as relative wall thickness (RWT_p). This study has been designed to evaluate age effects on RWT_p. WT_p, mean of septal thickness and WT_p (WT_m), and cavity radius were cross-sectionally evaluated in 766 1- to 85-year-old, normotensive, nonobese subjects and 331 hypertensive Italians (used as a test series). RWT_p 0.43 defined "traditional" concentric LV geometry. The ratios WT_m/radius (RWT_m) and RWT_p increased by 0.005 and 0.006 per year of age in the age stratum up to 17 years and by 0.002 in the older age stratum (18 years or older; all P<0.0001). Thus, RWT_m and RWT_p were normalized to average age in both age strata (10 and 46 years) by age-specific regression coefficients. The 90th and 95th percentiles of age-normalized RWT_p or RWT_m were 0.40 and 0.42 or 0.41 and 0.43, respectively, in adults and 0.36 and 0.39 or 0.36 and 0.38, respectively in young subjects. In hypertensive subjects, traditional RWT_p cutoff identified 74 subjects (22%) with concentric LV geometry; by 95th or 90th normal percentiles, normalized RWT_m identified 112 (34%), or 149 (45%) subjects with concentric LV geometry, and normalized RWT_p 29% and 39%, respectively (all P<0.0001 versus unadjusted RWT_p). Thus, prevalence of concentric LV geometry increases with age-normalized RWT. Accordingly, we suggest that concentric LV hypertrophy be defined by coexistence of high LV mass with age-normalized RWT_m >0.41 or RWT_p >0.40. Further studies are required to establish prognostic implications of our findings.

Key Words: hypertension, arterial • hypertrophy • aging

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Evaluation of concentricity of left ventricular (LV) geometry is usually performed using echocardiographic relative wall thickness (RWT), ie, the ratio of wall thickness to LV radius, which was originally shown to be closely related with the severity of aortic stenosis.¹ Combining RWT with the value of LV mass allows determination of the presence of LV hypertrophy and type of geometric pattern.² From a number of studies using these 2 measures, the most common LV geometric abnormality in arterial hypertension is eccentric LV hypertrophy,^3–5 although a pressure-overload component is of course present by definition in hypertension-related LV hypertrophy. An accepted explanation for this evidence is that LV geometry reflects the impact of volume as well as pressure overload.⁶ Arterial hypertension is in fact a composite condition in which volume and pressure overloads can be differently combined, and volume load plays an important role in sustaining high blood pressure values.^7,8

However, other reasons for the evidence of the substantial predominance of eccentric LV hypertrophy might be in the limitations of the method used to identify concentric LV geometry. Potential pitfalls in the calculation of RWT might include a nonlinear relation between wall thickness and LV internal radius and the effect of aging or body growth. This study has been performed in a large normotensive, nonobese population, encompassing a wide range of age, to test the hypotheses that relation between wall thickness and LV chamber dimension is linear and that RWT is positively correlated to age. We also evaluated new indicators of concentric LV geometry in a test population of hypertensive patients.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Participants
Two-dimensional echocardiograms were performed in 766 normotensive, nonobese individuals,^9,10 aged 1 to 85 years, 373 of whom were children or adolescents (1 to 17 years, 166 females) and 393 were adults (164 women). This reference population was studied in 3 University Hospitals: from New York, NY, from Cincinnati, Ohio, and from Naples, Italy. Detailed characteristics of this population and method of merging from different settings have been previously reported repeatedly.^11–14

A clinical population of 331 untreated hypertensive Italians was used as a test series to verify distribution of LV geometric pattern according to traditional or new criteria. Details about recruitment and characteristics of this test series have also been previously reported.¹⁵

Echocardiography
Two-dimensionally targeted M-mode echocardiograms were performed and read by expert sonographers as previously described in detail.^16–18 Measurements were taken according to the American Society of Echocardiography recommendations.¹⁹ LV mass was calculated by the adjusted American Society of Echocardiography method²⁰ and divided for body height raised to the power of 2.7, an allometric signal able to linearize the LV mass/height relations and to generate indexed values, which can be compared independently of the presence of obesity and during body growth.¹¹ After evaluating best-fitting models between wall thickness and LV internal dimension (LVID) in diastole (see Results), RWT was calculated with 2 simple methods:

where WT_p is posterior wall thickness, WT_m is WT_p plus interventricular septal thickness (IVST), and LVID_d is diastolic LV internal diameter.

Concentric LV geometry was traditionally defined for RWT_p 0.43.²¹ Alternative definitions were generated by "normalized" partition values of both RWT_m and RWT_p, as explained in next paragraph and detailed in the Results section.

Statistical Analysis
As previously reported in detail,¹² primary echocardiographic variables were adjusted for a "center effect" using the linear coefficient of regression of the relation of each variable with a dichotomous independent variable representing the center, in age, gender, and body size-matched groups of subjects (20 in each group).^13,14

The study population was divided into groups of children and adolescents up to 17 years old and adults 18 years or older, a stratification that takes into account the estimated period of body growth already used in previous analyses.^12–14 Kolmorov–Smirnov test was used to assess deviations from normal distribution.

Data are expressed as mean±1 SD. Proportion of concentric LV geometry and distribution of categories were studied by ² and, when needed, exact tests were performed using Monte Carlo method. To test the hypothesis that change in the binary outcome defining concentric LV geometry occurred in relation to the type of method of definition, the McNemar test for 2 related samples was used, based on ² distribution. Least squares linear and nonlinear regression analyses were used to describe relations between study variables. Differences between regression lines were tested by computing F-statistics of the between-slopes sum of squares. RWT was adjusted to the average value of age in each age stratum using the age-specific coefficient of regression. For convenience, this adjusted value was called "normalized" RWT.

The null hypothesis was rejected at 2-tailed 0.05.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
In the whole population, WT_m and WT_p were best related to LVID_d by power regressions, which did not significantly deviate from linearity (r=0.69 and 0.67, respectively). Thus, for simplicity, linear models were assumed (r=0.67, WT_m=0.38xLVID_d–0.25; and r=0.65, WT_p=0.18xLVID_d –0.09, respectively; both P<0.0001).

When the 2 age strata were separately examined, in children and adolescents (n=373) both WT_m and WT_p were best related to LVID_d by linear regressions, but the relations were less close (r=0.55, WT_m=0.28xLVID_d+0.04; and r=0.53, WT_p=0.15xLVID_d–0.02, respectively). Similarly, in adults (n=393) both WT_m and WT_p were related to LVID_d by linear regressions (r=0.26, WT_m=0.13xLVID_d+1.02; and r=0.29, WT_p=0.07xLVID_d+0.45, respectively; all P<0.0001) more weakly than in the whole population sample. The appreciable linearity of relations between WT and LVID_d demonstrated the legitimacy of calculating RWT by a simple (linear) ratio.

Age Effect
Figure I, available online at http://www.hypertensionaha.org shows that the relations between wall thickness and LV internal diameter were also influenced by age. Thus, relations of RWT to age were examined. In the whole population, both RWT_m and RWT_p were linearly related to age (Table I). In children and adolescents, RWT_m increased by 0.005 for each year of age, whereas in adults the increase was slightly less (0.002/year; Table I). Similarly, RWT_p increased by 0.006/year in children and adolescents, whereas this increase was significantly lower in adults (0.0015/year; P<0.01 between slopes). Residuals of these regressions were plotted against body height in each age stratum to exclude any heteroscedasticity of distribution referred to increasing height (not shown). Residual influence of body size could therefore be excluded.

Thus, RWT was normalized to the average age of each age strata (9.91±3.15 and 45.64±12.19 years, respectively) by using the age-specific regression coefficient, obtained in both methods of computation (ie, WT_m or WT_p), as shown in Table 1. No residual regression with age could be found in either age stratum for normalized RWT_m–p values (all r<0.001). No differences were found between girls and boys for both normalized RWT_m (0.35±0.06 versus 0.34±0.05) and RWT_p (0.35±0.06 versus 0.34±0.06; both P>0.1). Among adults, there was no gender difference in normalized RWT_m (0.34±0.05 in women and 0.35±0.05 in men, P>0.1), whereas normalized RWT_p was marginally higher in men (0.34±0.05) than in women (0.33±0.05; P<0.04).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Adjustment of RWT for Age Using Age-Specific Coefficient of Linear Regression and the Average Value of Age in Each Age Stratum

The Figure shows the distribution of normalized RWT_m and the upper percentiles of the distribution for both RWT_m and RWT_p in the 2 age strata.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Distribution of normalized RWTm (left panel). The distribution does not deviate significantly from normality. Tables of age-specific high percentiles for both RWTm and RWTp (right panels).

Reclassification of Hypertensive Subjects With Concentric LV Geometry
Based on distribution reported in the Figure, partition values of normalized RWT_m and RWT_p were compared with the traditional cutoff point of 0.43 for unadjusted RWT_p. Using 0.43 for unadjusted RWT_p identified 74 of 331 hypertensive patients with concentric LV geometry (22.4%). The 95th percentile of normalized RWT_m identified 33.8% of patients with concentric LV geometry (n=112; Figure II) and, perhaps even more important, could reclassify 47 of them, otherwise classified as with normal LV geometry, whereas 9 individuals classified as concentric with the traditional method could be reclassified as normal. These differences were statistically significant by the McNemar test. When examining the 90th percentile of the normalized RWT_m, these differences were even more evident: 149 subjects (45%) could be classified as concentric LV geometry (Figure II) and reclassification involved 78 individuals with normal and 3 individuals with concentric LV geometry by the traditional method. Similar results were found with normalized RWT_p (Figure II).

We examined the main hemodynamic characteristics of hypertensive individuals classified using traditional 0.43 and the 90th percentile of RWT_m. As expected, subjects classified as having concentric LV geometry with the traditional method were significantly older and exhibited higher blood pressure values and LV mass index and LV functional pattern consistent with concentric LV geometry (ie, normal ejection fraction and reduced mid-wall shortening; Table 2). In contrast, classifying by the 90^th percentile of normalized RWT_m, the difference in average age and LV mass index disappeared, whereas significant differences in blood pressure and mid-wall shortening remained (Table 2). Similar results were obtained using normalized RWT_p (not shown).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Comparison Between Normal and Concentric LV Geometry Based on Classification Using Traditional Methods or Using Normalized RWT (by WTm/LVIDd)

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Arterial hypertension is clinically appreciable, mainly as pressure overload condition, although its pathogenesis is in the alteration of the flow resistance relation; therefore, it can be also associated with volume overload. In contrast with this common pressure overload-oriented view, however, most epidemiological studies^3–5 have shown that the predominant LV geometric abnormality is characterized by the increase in LV mass, without significant alteration of wall thickness/LV radius ratio, a pattern defined eccentric LV hypertrophy,² although a predominant concentric LV geometry could be expected.

In this study, we found that although the relation between wall thickness and LV chamber radius can be legitimately assumed to be linear, aging has a potent influence both during body growth and during adulthood. If the definition of concentric LV geometry does not take into account this aspect, concentric LV geometry might be severely underestimated, especially during younger age, because the partition values normally used are derived from populations with a large prevalence of elderly subjects. The consequence of this underestimation is significant no matter what percentile of normal distribution of normalized RWT is taken as the cutoff point. In a cross-sectional analysis performed in a "test series" of hypertensive subjects, there are 2 relevant differences emerging using traditional or normalized RWT. In contrast with the traditional partition of 0.43 of RWT, definition of concentric LV geometry by age-normalized RWT did not highlight significant differences in age, LV mass, and LV chamber dimension, although blood pressure remained higher in the concentric pattern. Thus, with this classification, the alteration of LV geometry was in fact isolated from other anatomic abnormalities. LV chamber and mid-wall function distribution did not change between the methods of classification. According to our results, concentric LV hypertrophy should be better-defined by coexistence of cutoff values for LV mass/height^2.7 (ie, 51 g/m^2.7 in adults) and age-normalized RWT (ie, >0.41 or >0.40 for adults with RWT_m or RWT_p, respectively). Use of mean wall thickness might be preferable to the sole posterior wall thickness, because it is more consistent with the calculation of LV mass obtained including both posterior wall and septal thickness.

Differentiating concentric from normal LV geometry might be important for refining risk stratification and, possibly, for addressing treatment. Eccentric LV hypertrophy is characteristic of volume overload and has been thought to be associated with less severe degrees of LV mass increase²² and with more benign myocardial structural modifications.^23–25 Recently, Muiesan et al²⁶ demonstrated that for similar degrees of LV mass index, concentric LV geometry was associated with significantly greater cardiovascular risk, an observation already proposed by others.^27,28 Taking into account age increases the proportion of subjects with concentric LV geometry and redistribute them. Thus, because of this redistribution, the prognostic independent impact of concentric LV geometry might also change, especially considering that LV mass does not differ, as shown in Table 2.

One explanation for the increase in RWT observed with aging in adults²¹ is that concentricity of the LV follows the increased pressure overload associated with the age-related stiffening of conduit arteries,²⁹ a condition not necessarily normal. There is evidence that blood pressure does not increase with age in nonindustrialized populations,^30,31 and also in Western countries when particular environmental conditions occur.^30,32 Thus, age-related increase in blood pressure might not be "normal" in absolute terms. However, even when brachial blood pressure is maintained stable during aging, this stability is unlikely to occur in central blood pressure.³³ Accordingly, the apparent stability of brachial blood pressure with aging is associated with age-related increase in central blood pressure, accounting for the "physiological" increase in RWT.

Perspectives
The substantial finding emerging from this study is that consideration of age as a physiological confounder of RWT yields a reclassification of hypertensive patients, substantially based on the pure difference in LV geometry, given the similarity in age, LV mass, and chamber dimension between LV geometric patterns. Thus, this method appears to better-discriminate the underlying fundamental type of overload abnormality associated with arterial hypertension. Detailed analysis on flow/resistance relations, especially in younger hypertensive individuals, should be performed to better-discriminate between volume and pressure overload components of arterial hypertension. Possible evolution from an initial state of concentric LV remodeling to concentric LV hypertrophy should also be examined and, eventually, outcome analyses should be designed to explore this reclassification.

	Acknowledgments

 
Supported in part by grants HL-18323, HL-30605, HL-47540, and HL-34698 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md, and by grant MIUR-2003 of Ministry of University and Research, Italy.

Received September 13, 2004; first decision October 4, 2004; accepted October 29, 2004.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Reichek N, Devereux RB. Reliable estimation of peak left ventricular systolic pressure by M-mode echographic-determined end-diastolic relative wall thickness: identification of severe valvular aortic stenosis in adult patients. Am Heart J. 1982; 103: 202–209.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Ganau A, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, de Simone G, Pickering TG, Saba PS, Vargiu P, Simongini I, Laragh JH. Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19: 1550–1558.[Abstract]
3. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Alderman MH, Laragh JH. Relation of obesity and gender to left ventricular hypertrophy in normotensive and hypertensive adults. Hypertension. 1994; 23: 600–606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Carroll JF, Braden DS, Cockrell K, Mizelle HL. Obese hypertensive rabbits develop concentric and eccentric hypertrophy and diastolic filling abnormalities. Am J Hypertens. 1997; 10: 230–233.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Wachtell K, Bella JN, Liebson PR, Gerdts E, Dahlof B, Aalto T, Roman MJ, Papademetriou V, Ibsen H, Rokkedal J, Devereux RB. Impact of different partition values on prevalences of left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric geometry in a large hypertensive population: the LIFE study. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 6–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. de Simone G. Concentric or eccentric hypertrophy: how clinically relevant is the difference? Hypertension. 2004; 43: 714–715.[Free Full Text]
7. Frohlich ED, Chien Y, Sesoko S, Pegram BL. Relationship between dietary sodium intake, hemodynamics, and cardiac mass in SHR and WKY rats. Am J Physiol. 1993; 264: R30–R34.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Camargo MJ, Wallerson DC, Laragh JH. Influence of sodium intake on in vivo left ventricular anatomy in experimental renovascular hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1993; 264: H2103–H2110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Himes JH, Dietz WH. Guidelines for overweight in adolescent preventive services: recommendations from an expert committee. The Expert Committee on Clinical Guidelines for Overweight in Adolescent Preventive Services. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994; 59: 307–316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults–the evidence report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res. 1998; 6: 51S–209S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, Meyer RA, Roman MJ, de Divitiis O, Alderman MH. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 1251–1260.[Abstract]
12. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Mureddu G, Roman MJ, Kimball TR, Greco R, Witt S, Contaldo F. Stroke volume and cardiac output in normotensive children and adults. Assessment of relations with body size and impact of overweight. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1837–1843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Kimball TR, Mureddu GF, Roman MJ, Contaldo F, Daniels SR. Interaction between body size and cardiac workload: influence on left ventricular mass during body growth and adulthood. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 1077–1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Kimball TR, Roman MJ, Palmieri V, Celentano A, Daniels SR. Relation of heart rate to left ventricular dimensions in normotensive, normal-weight children, adolescents and adults. Ital Heart J. 2001; 2: 599–604.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Mureddu GF, Pasanisi F, Palmieri V, Celentano A, Contaldo F, de Simone G. Appropriate or inappropriate left ventricular mass in the presence or absence of prognostically adverse left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 1113–1119.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Kimball TR, Daniels SR, Loggie JM, Khoury P, Meyer RA. Relation of left ventricular mass, preload, afterload and contractility in pediatric patients with essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 997–1001.[Abstract]
17. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Ganau A, Saba PS, Alderman MH, Laragh JH. Assessment of left ventricular function by the midwall fractional shortening/end-systolic stress relation in human hypertension [published erratum appears in J Am Coll Cardiol 1994 Sep;24(3):844]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 1444–1451.[Abstract]
18. Mureddu GF, de Simone G, Greco R, Rosato GF, Contaldo F. Left ventricular filling in arterial hypertension. Influence of obesity and hemodynamic and structural confounders. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 544–550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978; 58: 1072–1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57: 450–458.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ganau A, Saba PS, Roman MJ, de Simone G, Realdi G, Devereux RB. Ageing induces left ventricular concentric remodelling in normotensive subjects. J Hypertens. 1995; 13: 1818–1822.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Carabello BA, Zile MR, Tanaka R, Cooper G. Left ventricular hypertrophy due to volume overload versus pressure overload. Am J Physiol. 1992; 263: H1137–H1144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Weber KT. Fibrosis and hypertensive heart disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000; 15: 264–272.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Ross RS, Borg TK. Integrins and the myocardium. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 1112–1119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Schmitt JP, Semsarian C, Arad M, Gannon J, Ahmad F, Duffy C, Lee RT, Seidman CE, Seidman JG. Consequences of pressure overload on sarcomere protein mutation-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1133–1138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Muiesan ML, Salvetti M, Monteduro C, Bonzi B, Paini A, Viola S, Poisa P, Rizzoni D, Castellano M, Agabiti-Rosei E. Left ventricular concentric geometry during treatment adversely affects cardiovascular prognosis in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 731–738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Gattobigio R, Zampi I, Santucci A, Santucci C, Reboldi G, Porcellati C. Prognostic value of left ventricular mass and geometry in systemic hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 197–202.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Krumholz HM, Larson M, Levy D. Prognosis of left ventricular geometric patterns in the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 879–884.[Abstract]
29. Roman MJ, Ganau A, Saba PS, Pini R, Pickering TG, Devereux RB. Impact of arterial stiffening on left ventricular structure. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 489–494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Green MS, Etzion T, Jucha E. Blood pressure and serum cholesterol among male Ethiopian immigrants compared to other Israelis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991; 45: 281–286.[Abstract]
31. Pauletto P, Caroli M, Pessina AC, Dal Palu C. Hypertension prevalence and age-related changes of blood-pressure in semi-nomadic and urban Oromos of Ethiopia. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994; 10: 159–164.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Timio M, Verdecchia P, Venanzi S, Gentili S, Ronconi M, Francucci B, Montanari M, Bichisao E. Age and blood pressure changes. A 20-year follow-up study in nuns in a secluded order. Hypertension. 1988; 12: 457–461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. van der Heijden-Spek JJ, Staessen JA, Fagard RH, Hoeks AP, Boudier HA, Van Bortel LM. Effect of age on brachial artery wall properties differs from the aorta and is gender dependent: a population study. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 637–642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Chinali, G. de Simone, M. J. Roman, L. G. Best, E. T. Lee, M. Russell, B. V. Howard, and R. B. Devereux Cardiac Markers of Pre-Clinical Disease in Adolescents With the Metabolic Syndrome: The Strong Heart Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 9, 2008; 52(11): 932 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Chami, R. B. Devereux, J. S. Gottdiener, R. Mehra, M. J. Roman, E. J. Benjamin, and D. J. Gottlieb Left Ventricular Morphology and Systolic Function in Sleep-Disordered Breathing: The Sleep Heart Health Study Circulation, May 20, 2008; 117(20): 2599 - 2607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Ippisch, T. H. Inge, S. R. Daniels, B. Wang, P. R. Khoury, S. A. Witt, B. J. Glascock, V. F. Garcia, and T. R. Kimball Reversibility of Cardiac Abnormalities in Morbidly Obese Adolescents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 8, 2008; 51(14): 1342 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. de Simone, J. S. Gottdiener, M. Chinali, and M. S. Maurer Left ventricular mass predicts heart failure not related to previous myocardial infarction: the Cardiovascular Health Study Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 741 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Innelli, R. Sanchez, F. Marra, R. Esposito, and M. Galderisi The impact of aging on left ventricular longitudinal function in healthy subjects: a pulsed tissue Doppler study Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 241 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Chinali, G. de Simone, M. C. Matteucci, S. Picca, A. Mastrostefano, A. Anarat, S. Caliskan, N. Jeck, T. J. Neuhaus, A. Peco-Antic, et al. Reduced Systolic Myocardial Function in Children with Chronic Renal Insufficiency J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 593 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Drukteinis, M. J. Roman, R. R. Fabsitz, E. T. Lee, L. G. Best, M. Russell, and R. B. Devereux Cardiac and Systemic Hemodynamic Characteristics of Hypertension and Prehypertension in Adolescents and Young Adults: The Strong Heart Study Circulation, January 16, 2007; 115(2): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. de Simone Morbid Obesity and Left Ventricular Geometry Hypertension, January 1, 2007; 49(1): 7 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Chinali, G. de Simone, M. J. Roman, E. T. Lee, L. G. Best, B. V. Howard, and R. B. Devereux Impact of Obesity on Cardiac Geometry and Function in a Population of Adolescents: The Strong Heart Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2267 - 2273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Matteucci, E. Wuhl, S. Picca, A. Mastrostefano, G. Rinelli, C. Romano, G. Rizzoni, O. Mehls, G. de Simone, F. Schaefer, et al. Left Ventricular Geometry in Children with Mild to Moderate Chronic Renal Insufficiency J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 218 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 45/1/64    most recent 01.HYP.0000150108.37527.57v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by de Simone, G. Articles by Devereux, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by de Simone, G. Articles by Devereux, R. B. Related Collections Clinical Studies Cardiac development Epidemiology Hypertrophy Echocardiography