Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2005;45:264-269
Published online before print January 3, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000153305.50128.a1
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/2/264    most recent
01.HYP.0000153305.50128.a1v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malik, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Heagerty, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malik, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Heagerty, A. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Hypertension. 2005;45:264.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Effects of Angiotensin Type-1 Receptor Antagonism on Small Artery Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Rayaz A. Malik; Ian J. Schofield; Ashley Izzard; Clare Austin; Georgina Bermann; Anthony M. Heagerty

From the Cardiovascular Research Group (R.A.M., I.J.S., A.I., C.A., A.M.H.), Department of Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca R&D (G.B.), Mölndal, Sweden.

Correspondence to A.M. Heagerty, Cardiovascular Research Group, Department of Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK. E-mail tony.heagerty{at}man.ac.uk


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated to occur in small arteries from patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. The effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade on vessel function were examined using pressure myography in a randomized 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group study using candesartan cilexitil. The maximal vascular response to acetylcholine (Ach) was impaired at baseline and improved with candesartan. This improvement was primarily caused by an effect in the nitric oxide component of Ach-mediated dilatation. The degree of endothelial dysfunction directly correlated with serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Sodium nitroprusside-induced endothelium-independent dilatation was reduced in diabetic patients and intervention with candesartan lead to an improvement in EC50 with no change in maximal response. Vasoconstriction to norepinephrine was normal and did not change with intervention, but responses to angiotensin II were reduced after candesartan in diabetic patients. These results demonstrate that even brief treatment with angiotensin II receptor blockade is associated with a significant improvement in resistance vessel endothelial function.


Key Words: angiotensin II • clinical trials • diabetes mellitus • endothelium • nitric oxide • arterioles


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In patients with type 2 diabetes (type 2DM), both macrovascular and microvascular diseases are a cause of considerable morbidity and mortality.1,2 Accelerated vascular disease in type 2DM is associated with hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.3 Intensive glycemic control reduces the risk of predominantly microvascular and to a lesser extent macrovascular complications in both type 1 diabetes and type 2DM.4,5 Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors6 and angiotensin II receptor blockers7 in patients with type 2DM significantly improves both macrovascular and microvascular end points, including nephropathy,8–10 retinopathy,11 and neuropathy.12 Cholesterol lowering may produce a greater clinical impact in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients with coronary heart disease.13

Small arteries of patients with type 2DM demonstrate both functional and structural alterations that include deficient endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine (Ach) and bradykinin and hypertrophic remodeling.14 Recently, we have demonstrated endothelial dysfunction and a highly significant loss of myogenic responsiveness leading to resistance vessel hypertrophy in patients with type 2DM.15 Also, Rizzoni et al have shown that structural alterations in the resistance vessels are significantly associated with the occurrence of future cardiovascular events.16

The severity of endothelial dysfunction reported in type 2DM is related to the degree of dyslipidemia.15 Although the detailed mechanism remains undetermined, enhanced oxidative stress appears to be crucial for the perturbation in endothelial function brought about by hypercholesterolemia.17 Angiotensin II type-1 (AT1) receptor activation is a predominant source of free radical release in the vascular wall.18,19 Studies in vitro and in humans have shown that hypercholesterolemia induces AT1 receptor overexpression and increased oxidative stress.20,21 Accordingly, it was decided to examine whether blocking the AT1 receptor would have favorable effects in small arteries from patients with type 2DM in a short-term treatment trial using the AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan cilexitil. In particular, we wished to examine whether improvement occurred in small artery function in normotensive and hypertensive patients with type 2DM.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A randomized 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was performed in 32 patients with type 2DM with (placebo, n=7; candesartan, n=7) and without (placebo, n=9; candesartan, n=9) hypertension. All subjects gave full informed written consent before taking part in the study, which was approved by the local research ethics committee. To standardize treatment, patients with type 2DM continued their therapy for maintaining glycemic control but any treatment for hypertension was stopped for 4 weeks before the study. The presence of hypertension and type 2DM was in accord with internationally defined guidelines.22 Patients were randomized to placebo or candesartan 8 mg daily for 4 weeks, which was then increased to 16 mg daily in all patients. On the day of study, venous blood samples were drawn from an antecubital vein for assessment of renal function, glucose, and lipid profile (total cholesterol and lipid subfraction), and glycosylated hemoglobin. Atorvastatin was prescribed in 1 patient in the placebo group and in 1 patient in the candesartan group. Microalbuminuria was quantified using 3 timed overnight urine collections. Blood pressure was measured sitting after 15 minutes of rest using a semi-automatic machine (OMRON 705 CP; White Medical, Rugby, UK) with the mean of 3 readings recorded.

Pressure Arteriography
A single subcutaneous gluteal fat biopsy sample was obtained from each subject at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention; 3 to 5 mL of 1% lignocaine was infiltrated, allowing tissue (2x1.5x1.5 cm) to be harvested and placed immediately in ice-cold physiological saline solution.23 Small arteries 65 µm to 230 µm were isolated and carefully cleaned under a dissecting microscope. Vessels were transferred to an arteriograph bath chamber (Living Systems Instruments, Burlington, Vt),23 cannulated,24,25 and examined as described previously.15

Pharmacological Assessment
To assess viability, vessels were challenged serially with 60 mmol KPSS until a steady vasoconstriction >50% was reproducible. Each vessel was stimulated with the cumulative addition (3 to 5 minutes per concentration) of norepinephrine, angiotensin II, Ach after preconstriction with 10–5 norepinephrine, Ach after 30 minutes of incubation with 5x10–5 (mol/L) L-NG-monomethyl-arginine (L-NMMA), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) as described in detail previously.15 The lumen diameter (µm) of the vessels was measured and the contractile and dilator responses were calculated as the percentage change in diameter normalized to maximum response to that agonist. EC50 values (concentration to give 50% maximum contractile or dilatory response) used the percentage changes normalized to maximum response to the agonist.

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SEM. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons were used to evaluate differences among groups with a significance level of P<0.05. Differences in maximal response were assessed using analysis of covariance and overall response summarizes effects concerning the whole concentration response curve. Computations were performed using the SAS 8.2 statistical computing package. Treatment effects on EC50s were assessed by fitting a mixed effects nonlinear model using the Non-Linear Mixed Effects library module in the S-PLUS 6.1 package. Statistical analyses for treatment effect were performed comparing differences in post-treatment response between the active treatment and placebo group. To assess the effect of age, Wald test was used in a fitted regression model using age as an explanatory variable and maximum response as the dependent variable. The relation between lipids and endothelial dysfunction was quantified by computing correlation coefficients denoted as "r" and "p" in the graphs, a linear regression model was fitted, and regression line was depicted in the figure.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Demographic Characteristics
The demographic details of the type 2DM patients and control subjects who took part in the study are shown in the Table. Both normotensive and hypertensive patients were older than control subjects (P=0.08 and P=0.012, respectively). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly higher in hypertensive type 2DM subjects compared with control subjects (P<0.0001; Table). Total serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol did not differ significantly between control subjects and patients with type 2DM. High-density lipoprotein was significantly lower in both normotensive (P<0.0001) and hypertensive (P<0.001) type 2DM (Table) subjects. Urinary albumin excretion rate did not differ significantly between patients with type 2DM and control subjects (Table). Blood pressure decreased in the placebo-treated (normotensive: systolic, 131.3±4.5 to 129.7±5.3; diastolic, 81.9±2.1 to 75.6±2.7; hypertensive: systolic, 154.5±8.7 to 146.4±8.0; diastolic, 89.1±3.0 to 81.9±4.6) and candesartan-treated (normotensive: systolic, 130.4±4.7 to 124.9±6.3; diastolic, 80.0±2.5 to 77.0±2.9; hypertensive: systolic, 155.4±5.8 to 148.9±8.7; diastolic, 94.8±2.9 to 86.9±5.6) patients with no significant difference for either systolic (P=0.247) or diastolic (P=0.717) blood pressure between candesartan and placebo in patients with type 2DM. There was no significant linear relation between age and myography variables. All data are presented at baseline comparing the arteries from diabetic patients with and without hypertension with vessels from control subjects. The effects of intervention were assessed by determining the change in the candesartan group compared with the change in the placebo group. The data are presented without the placebo curves but these are available in electronic form.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Baseline Demographics for Patients and Control Subjects Studied

Vasoconstrictor Function
With norepinephrine, the maximum contractile response was not significantly different between control subjects and hypertensive and normotensive type 2DM subjects (Figure 1a). Treatment with candesartan did not influence maximum response but improved sensitivity (EC50) (P=0.012) to norepinephrine in normotensive subjects (Figure 1b) but had no effect in hypertensive (Figure 1c) type 2DM subjects.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Constriction of vessels comparing control subjects with normotensive and hypertensive type 2 diabetes (type 2DM) (A) and response assessed by change in EC50, maximal relaxation, and overall relaxation to candesartan in normotensive (B) and hypertensive (C) type 2 DM subjects exposed to increasing concentrations of norepinephrine.

The contractile response and sensitivity (EC50) to angiotensin II did not differ in small arteries from control subjects compared with normotensive and hypertensive type 2DM subjects (Figure 2a). Treatment with candesartan had no significant effect on either maximum response or EC50 in normotensive (Figure 2b) and hypertensive (Figure 2c) type 2DM subjects. The overall contraction was significantly reduced in normotensive type 2DM with candesartan subjects. The baseline-adjusted responses for change from baseline with angiotensin II were reduced by 23% in normotensive type 2DM and by 71% in hypertensive type 2DM.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Constriction of vessels comparing control subjects with normotensive and hypertensive type 2DM (A) and response assessed by change in EC50, maximal relaxation, and overall relaxation to candesartan in normotensive (B) and hypertensive (C) type 2 DM subjects exposed to increasing concentrations of angiotensin II.

Vasodilator Function
There was a significant reduction in the maximal relaxation response to Ach in small arteries from both normotensive (56.3±20.8% P<0.001) and hypertensive type 2DM subjects (49.0±20.3%; P<0.001) when compared with control subjects (87.2±16.0%) (Figure 3a). Treatment with candesartan significantly improved overall relaxation to acetylcholine in small arteries from normotensive (P<0.001) (Figure 3b) and hypertensive (P<0.05) (Figure 3c) type 2DM subjects, with an additional improvement in EC50 in hypertensive type 2DM subjects (P<0.001) (Figure 3c). There was a significant negative correlation between serum LDL cholesterol and maximum relaxation to acetylcholine in vessels from normotensive (r=–0.83; P<0.01) (Figure 4a) and hypertensive (Figure 4b) type 2DM subjects (r=–0.71; P=0.03).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Dilation of vessels comparing control subjects with normotensive and hypertensive type 2DM (A) and response assessed by change in EC50, maximal relaxation, and overall relaxation to candesartan in normotensive (B) and hypertensive (C) type 2 DM exposed to increasing concentrations of Ach after preconstriction with norepinephrine.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Regression plots of maximal vasodilator response to Ach against serum concentration of low-density lipoprotein in normotensive (A) and hypertensive (B) diabetic patients.

Small arteries incubated with L-NMMA and then challenged again with Ach showed a 27% reduction in maximum relaxation. However, vessels from hypertensive and normotensive type 2DM subjects showed 7.2% and 5.4% reduction in maximum response (Figure 5a). Small but significant improvements were observed with candesartan after L-NMMA in response to Ach for overall relaxation in normotensive subjects (P<0.002), (Figure 5b) and for maximal response (P<0.05) and EC50 (P<0.001) in hypertensive type 2 DM subjects (Figure 5c).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Dilation of vessels comparing control subjects with normotensive and hypertensive type 2DM (A) and response assessed by change in EC50, maximal relaxation, and overall relaxation to candesartan in normotensive (B) and hypertensive (C) type 2 DM subjects exposed to increasing concentrations of Ach after pre-incubation of preconstricted small arteries with L-NMMA (5x10–5 m).

The maximal response to SNP was reduced in normotensive diabetic patients (46.6±18.7%), reaching significance in hypertensive type 2DM (39±16.7%; P<0.04) compared with control subjects (57±15.3%) (Figure 6a). Intervention with candesartan improved EC50 in both normotensive (P<0.05) (Figure 6b) and hypertensive (P<0.05) (Figure 6c) type 2 DM subjects with no effect on maximal response or overall relaxation.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Dilation of vessels comparing control subjects with normotensive and hypertensive type 2DM (A) and response assessed by change in EC50, maximal relaxation, and overall relaxation to candesartan in normotensive (B) and hypertensive (C) type 2 DM subjects exposed to increasing concentrations of sodium nitroprusside after preconstriction with norepinephrine.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study confirms the results of previous work demonstrating a significant alteration in the function of small arteries from normotensive and hypertensive patients with type 2DM.14,15 Now we have shown that these functional abnormalities can be ameliorated in part using an angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist, thereby possibly providing some explanation toward the clinical benefit observed in preventing progression of diabetic nephropathy,8–10 retinopathy,11 and neuropathy.12

Treatment for 3 months with candesartan cilexitil produced small decreases in blood pressure, but the study was not designed to show significant changes in this parameter because the cohorts were recruited to examine effects on arterial function. The sensitivity and reactivity to Ach were impaired in small vessels from patients with type 2DM. These findings are consistent with previous reports in both type 1 diabetes25 and type 2DM.14,15 One mechanism by which Ach effects vascular dilatation is by the release of nitric oxide from the endothelium. The studies with L-NMMA confirm that the main abnormality underlying deranged dilator function in small arteries from type 2DM is deficiency of functionally active nitric oxide. However, the small but significant improvement after L-NMMA suggests that nitric oxide-independent relaxation is also improved. Our studies suggest that the nitric oxide-dependent abnormality is related to circulating levels of LDL cholesterol that have been linked to abnormalities of endothelial function in subjects with normal and raised cholesterol concentrations.26–28 To establish causality, further work is required. Although it is recognized that aging progressively impairs endothelial function in humans,29 and that our diabetic patients were older than control subjects, careful analyses have discounted age as a major factor in this and in our previous work.15 It is recognized that hypercholesterolemia induces increased AT1 receptor expression and oxidative stress,20,21 and AT1 receptor activation is a powerful source of free radical release in the vascular wall.18,19 Recently, it has been demonstrated that LDL induces the expression of AT1 receptor upregulation and hypercholesterolemic rabbits display enhanced vascular expression of AT1 receptors, representing increased activity of angiotensin II.30 Therefore, our finding that AT1 antagonism with candesartan cilexitil improves endothelial function by as much as 30% would support the role of the renin-angiotensin system in provoking endothelial dysfunction in these patients secondary to slightly raised LDL cholesterol levels. Angiotensin receptor antagonists not only enhance both endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vascular vasodilation capacity in patients with essential hypertension31 but also have been recently reported to improve endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolemic patients.32 The mechanism implicated must involve improvement in the bioavailability of nitric oxide, and blocking AT1 receptors would achieve this with free radical generation being ameliorated. Our data on the maximal contractile response to angiotensin II confirm that effective blockade of the resistance vessel AT1 receptors is achieved with candesartan, particularly in hypertensive type 2 DM patients. In this context, it has been recently shown that C-reactive protein, which is an important inflammatory mediator as well as an acute phase reactant, upregulates AT1 receptors in the vasculature, an effect attenuated by losartan.33

The implications for patients with type 2DM are that treatment strategies that lower lipid levels (even in the normal range at presentation) improve mortality and morbidity,34 and it is known that endothelial function can be restored to normal in small arteries of patients with hypercholesterolemia.27 The reduced dilation to sodium nitroprusside could represent a reduction in smooth muscle sensitivity to nitric oxide, because this was improved with intervention with candesartan, whereas the maximal response remained unchanged. Candesartan improved both sensitivity and maximal response to Ach in type 2DM, supporting the idea of a greater benefit of candesartan on endothelial dysfunction.

It is attractive to suggest that the combination of lipid-lowering drugs with angiotensin II receptor antagonism might provide a combination that would be associated with synergistic effects on mortality and morbidity in diabetes.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by a grant from Astra Zeneca. We thank Maureen Speed for her excellent secretarial assistance.

Received August 18, 2004; first decision September 7, 2004; accepted December 2, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Morrish NJ, Wang SL, Stevens LK, Fuller JH, Keen H. Mortality and causes of death in the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2001; 44 (Suppl 2): S14–S21.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 229–234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Guerci B, Bohme P, Kearney-Schwartz A, Zannad F, Drouin P. Endothelial dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Part 2: altered endothelial function and the effects of treatments in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2001; 27: 436–447.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 381–389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998; 352: 854–865.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Lancet. 2000; 355: 253–259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Beevers G, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Kristiansson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H, Aurup P, Edelman J, Snapinn S; The LIFE Study Group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002; 359: 1004–1010.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Parving HH, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, Gomis R, Andersen S, Arner P. Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria Study Group. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 870–878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S; RENAAL Study Investigators. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 861–869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, Ritz E, Atkins RC, Rohde R, Raz I; Collaborative Study Group. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 851–860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Chaturvedi N, Sjolie A-K, Stephenson JM, Abrahamian H, Kiepes M, Castellarian A, Rogulja-Pepeonik Z, Fuller JH. Effect of lisinopril on progression of retinopathy in normotensive people with type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 1998; 351: 28–31.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Malik RA, Williamson S, Abbott CA, Carrington AL, Iqbal J, Schady W, Boulton AJM. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor trandolapril on human diabetic neuropathy: randomised double-blind controlled trial. Lancet. 1998; 352: 1978–1981.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Pyorala K, Pedersen TR, Kjekshus J, Faergeman O, Olsson AG, Thorgeirsson G. Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 614–620.[Abstract]

14. Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Guelfi D, Muiesan ML, Valentini U, Cimino A, Girelli A, Rodella L, Bianchi R, Sleiman I, Rosei EA. Structural alterations in subcutaneous small arteries of normotensive and hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1238–1244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Schofield I, Malik RA, Izzard A, Austin C, Heagerty AM. Vascular structural and functional changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Evidence for the role of abnormal myogenic responsiveness and dyslipidemia. Circulation. 2002; 106: 3037–3043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Boari GE, De Ciuceis C, Sleiman I, Muiesan ML, Castellano M, Miclini M, Agabiti-Rosei E. Prognostic significance of small-artery structure in hypertension. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2230–2235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Harrison DG. Endothelial function and oxidative stress. Clin Cardiol. 1997; 20: II-11–II-17.

18. Griendling KK, Minieri CA, Ollerenshaw JD, Alexander RW. Angiotensin II stimulates NADH and NADPH oxidase activity in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1994; 74: 1141–1148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Rajagopalan S, Kurz S, Münzel T, Tarpey M, Freeman BA, Griendline KK, Harrison DG. Angiotensin II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation: contribution to alteration of vasomotor tone. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97: 1916–1923.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Nickenig G, Sackinidis A, Michaelsen F, Böhm M, Seewald S, Vener H. Upregulation of vascular angiotensin II receptor gene expression by low-density lipoprotein in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 1997; 95: 473–478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Nickenig G, Bäumer AT, Temur Y, Kebben D, Jockenhövel F, Böhm M. Statin-sensitive dysregulated AT1 receptor function and density in hypercholesterolemic men. Circulation. 1999; 100: 2131–2134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Am Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Recommendations. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: S1–S149.[CrossRef]

23. Heagerty AM, Aalkjaaer C, Bund SJ, Korsgaard N, Mulvany MJ. Small artery structure in hypertension: dual process of remodelling and growth. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 391–397.[Free Full Text]

24. Falloon BJ, Heagerty AM. In vitro perfusion studies of human resistance artery function in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1994; 24: 16–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. McNally PG, Watt PAC, Rimmer T, Burden AC, Hearnshaw JR, Thurston H. Impaired contraction and endothelium-dependent relaxation in isolated resistance vessels from patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin Sci. 1994; 87: 31–36.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Steinberg HO, Bayazeed B, Hook G, Johnson A, Cronin J, Baron AD. Endothelial dysfunction is associated with cholesterol levels in the high normal range in humans. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3287–3293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Goode GK, Heagerty AM. In vitro responses of human peripheral small arteries in hypercholesterolemia and effects of therapy. Circulation. 1995; 91: 2898–2903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Cooper A, Heagerty AM. Endothelial dysfunction in human intramyocardial small arteries in atherosclerosis and hypercholesterolemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1998; 44: H1482–1488.

29. Gerhard M, Roddy M-A, Creager SJ, Creager MA. Ageing progressively impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilation in forearm resistance vessels in humans. Hypertension. 1996; 27: 849–853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Nickenig G, Jung O, Strehlow K, Zolk O, Linz W, Scholkens BA, Bohm M. Hypercholesterolemia is associated with enhanced angiotensin AT1-receptor expression. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: H2701–H2707.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Bragulat E, Larrousse M, Coca A, de la Sierra A. Effect of long-term irbesartan treatment on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in essential hypertensive patients. Br J Biomed Sci. 2003; 60: 191–196.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Wassman S, Hilgers S, Laufs U, Böhm M, Nickenig G. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism improves hypercholesterolemia-associated endothelial dysfunction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1208–1212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Wang CH, Li SH, Weisel RD, Fedak PW, Dumont AS, Szmitko P, Li RK, Mickle DA, Verma S. C-reactive protein up regulates angiotensin type 1 receptors in vascular smooth muscle. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1783–1790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleigh P, Peto R; Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003; 361: 2005–2016.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Satoh, S. Fujimoto, S. Arakawa, T. Yada, T. Namikoshi, Y. Haruna, H. Horike, T. Sasaki, and N. Kashihara
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker ameliorates uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase in rats with experimental diabetic nephropathy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 3806 - 3813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Su, P. A. Lucchesi, R. A. Gonzalez-Villalobos, D. I. Palen, B. M. Rezk, Y. Suzuki, H. A. Boulares, and K. Matrougui
Role of Advanced Glycation End Products With Oxidative Stress in Resistance Artery Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetic Mice
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, August 1, 2008; 28(8): 1432 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
S. Belmadani, D. I. Palen, R. A. Gonzalez-Villalobos, H. A. Boulares, and K. Matrougui
Elevated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Phosphorylation Induces Resistance Artery Dysfunction in Diabetic db/db Mice
Diabetes, June 1, 2008; 57(6): 1629 - 1637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Savoia, R. M. Touyz, F. Amiri, and E. L. Schiffrin
Selective Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker Eplerenone Reduces Resistance Artery Stiffness in Hypertensive Patients
Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 432 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Savoia, R. M. Touyz, and E. L. Schiffrin
Response to Are the Eutrophic Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Real?
Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): E19 - E19.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Savoia, R. M. Touyz, D. H. Endemann, Q. Pu, E. A. Ko, C. De Ciuceis, and E. L. Schiffrin
Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Added to Previous Antihypertensive Agents on Arteries of Diabetic Hypertensive Patients
Hypertension, August 1, 2006; 48(2): 271 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
L. J. Coppey, E. P. Davidson, T. W. Rinehart, J. S. Gellett, C. L. Oltman, D. D. Lund, and M. A. Yorek
ACE Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Attenuates Diabetic Neuropathy in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats
Diabetes, February 1, 2006; 55(2): 341 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/2/264    most recent
01.HYP.0000153305.50128.a1v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malik, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Heagerty, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malik, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Heagerty, A. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide