| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2005;45:294.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology (H.H., A.P., S.D.H., D.A.F., T.C.S.), Biostatistics (L.L., N.S.F.), and Endocrinology and Metabolism (U.W., M.H.W.), Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; and Division of Nephrology (P.C., D.T.O.), Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine.
Correspondence to Herbert Ho, MD, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1001 W Tenth St, WD Myers Room W7123, Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail heho{at}iupui.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
26 years later, studied the relationship between blood pressure, carbohydrate intolerance, and vascular compliance in the same subjects. The second study was a cross-sectional evaluation of 412 normotensive and hypertensive subjects conducted at the University of California San Diego. The second study (MantelHaenszel
2 test; P=0.05) showed that a greater proportion of black participants with poor blood pressure control had CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype. Evaluation of the untreated blood pressure from phase 1 of the first study showed that the blacks with CYP3A5*3/*3 (146±35 mm Hg) had a higher systolic blood pressure than those with the *1/*3 (119±14.1 mm Hg; P=0.0006) and *1/*1 (125±17.4 mm Hg; P=0.009) genotypes. For blacks in study 2, the CYP3A5*1 allele was more common in hypertensives (Fisher exact test; P=0.025) than normotensives. In whites there was no association between CYP3A5 genotype and blood pressure in either study. We conclude that although untreated blood pressure may be higher in blacks with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype, the CYP3A5*1 allele may be associated with hypertension that is more refractory to treatment in this ethnic group.
Key Words: cytochrome p450 blood pressure genetics polymorphism
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A large number of candidate genes have been associated with hypertension.7 Some genes, such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene, have been associated with cardiovascular disease but not hypertension, whereas other genes, such as the ß2-adrenergic receptor gene, have been implicated in the regulation of arterial pressure. Recently, the polymorphically expressed CYP3A5 has been associated with blood pressure (BP) in humans. In contrast to the functional CYP3A5*1 allele, the CYP3A5*3 variant has a mutation in intron 3 that leads to the production of an aberrant mRNA and ultimately a truncated protein.8,9 Givens et al10 reported that in a group of 25 blacks, the CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype exhibited higher systolic BP (SBP) and mean arterial BP and creatinine clearance when compared with the *1/*3 and *3/*3 genotypes.
The CYP3A enzymes are steroid 6ß-hydroxylases that convert cortisol to 6ß-hydroxycortisol11 and corticosterone to 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone.1214 CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 are abundantly expressed in the liver and small intestine, but in the kidney, CYP3A5 is predominant. Thus, the genetic polymorphism in CYP3A5 may manifest itself through an effect on endogenous cortisol metabolism in the kidney15 that may ultimately affect BP most probably through sodium and water retention. Our preliminary data indicate that the kidney is capable of cortisol 6ß-hydroxylation but only in individuals who express CYP3A5.15,16 In animal1214 and in vitro1719 experiments, expression of CYP3A enzymes has been shown to correlate with sodium reabsorption1719 and BP.1214 However, the effects of 6ß-hydroxycortisol or 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone on sodium handling or BP in humans have not been examined.
It has been hypothesized that because CYP3A5 is present in the kidney, it is possible that individuals with
1 functional alleles may demonstrate increased BP, perhaps as a result of sodium and water retention. We evaluated the relationship of the CYP3A5 genotype with BP in 2 diverse and well-characterized populations of normal and hypertensive humans.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The assessment of BPs during the salt sensitivity determination in phase 1 required the withdrawal of antihypertensive medications for
2 weeks,20,23 whereas during phase 2 of the study, subjects continued to take their respective medications. Subjects were classified as normotensive if BP readings were <140/90 mm Hg during both studies and not receiving antihypertensive medications.20 Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) was computed as the product of fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) and insulin (µIU/mL) concentrations divided by 22.5.24
The second study was conducted in greater San Diego, Calif. Hypertensive subjects were recruited from the Hypertension Specialty Clinic and General Medical Clinic of the University of California at San Diego and the Veterans Affairs San Diego health care system. Normotensive subjects came from the hospital, university, and the community. The drug regimen for each hypertensive subject was also recorded. Both studies were approved by the institutional review boards of the respective institutions. Informed consent was obtained for all subjects.
Genotyping
CYP3A5*3 genotyping was performed by allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction using the method of Hiratsuka et al25,26 with slight modifications.27
Data Analysis
The 2 studies were analyzed separately. Whites and blacks were also analyzed separately. A
2 test was used to determine whether the distribution of genotypes was consistent with the HardyWeinberg equilibrium. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the effects of the different genotypes (*1/*1, *1/*3, *3/*3) on the measured end points (vide supra) that have continuous scales and
2 test for end points with discrete scale. We considered a P
0.05 to be statistically significant.
When subjects were not taking their antihypertensive medications (phase 1 of study 1), we compared the measured BP according to their CYP3A5 genotype. When they were taking their antihypertensive medications (study 2 and phase 2 of study 1), comparing measured BP would be inappropriate, and we adopted 2 approaches.
First, we used the number of antihypertensive medications as a gauge of the severity of hypertension and compared the number of subjects with good BP control (SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP <90 mm Hg) with the poorly controlled ones. However, this was not a clinical trial, so we did not have control over the medications. For subjects taking
3 antihypertensive medications, each drug was titrated up to either the maximum recommended dose or maximum tolerable side effects before the next drug was added.
In the second approach, we accounted for the effects of the antihypertensive medications using the method described by Cui et al,28 in which "stepped increments of 8/4 mm Hg, 14/10 mm Hg, and 20/16 mm Hg were added to measured SBP/DBP of treated subjects taking 1, 2, and 3 drug classes, respectively." We modified this approach by using the same increment of 20/16 mm Hg for
4 drug classes.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 test, we found that gender was not significantly correlated with the CYP3A5 genotype for blacks or whites.
|
|
We examined BP of the subjects in study 1, phase 1, after medications had been withheld for 2 weeks. Among blacks (Figure), those with *3/*3 had higher baseline SBP (P=0.023 versus *1/*1; P=0.002 versus *1/*3) and baseline diastolic BP (DBP; P<0.015 versus *1/*3). The *3/*3 black group was also found to have a significantly higher SBP, DBP, and mean arterial BP after saline infusion and after receiving furosemide when compared with the other 2 genotypic groups (Figure). SBP and mean arterial BP for the *1/*3 individuals after furosemide administration were also significantly higher than those with the *1/*1 genotype. Although the *3/*3 group was
7 years older than the *1/*1 group and 8 years older than the *1/*3 groups, this is not statistically significant. The conclusions regarding intergenotypic differences in BPs (baseline, after saline infusion, and after furosemide administration) remained after adjusting for age using the analysis of covariance. In whites, there were no differences in BP between those expressing the *1/*3 and *3/*3 genotypes (P>0.18).
|
In study 1, phase 1, there was a greater proportion of salt-sensitive subjects in the hypertensive group when compared with the normotensive group (0.60 versus 0.37 for whites and 0.80 versus 0.44 for blacks). The CYP3A5 genotype did not influence salt sensitivity status except for the white hypertensives where the *1/*3 group had a greater proportion of salt-sensitive subjects when compared with the *3/*3 group (
2 test P=0.01 for white hypertensives; P=0.51 for white normotensives; P=0.13 for black normotensives; P=0.49 for black hypertensives). Creatinine clearance and urine albumin excretion were not significantly different among genotypes for whites or blacks.
We also analyzed the BP measured while the subjects were on their respective antihypertensive medications. In study 2, we grouped normotensive and hypertensive blacks with good control (SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP <90 mm Hg) with
2 antihypertensive medications and compared them with poorly controlled hypertensive blacks on
3 antihypertensive drugs. This comparison revealed that the poorly controlled group consisted of a higher proportion of the *1/*1 genotype than the subjects with good control (Table 3; MantelHaenszel
2 test; P=0.05). No differences in genotype frequencies were noted between good and poor control for whites. For the second phase of study 1, there were no significant differences in genotype distribution between good and poor control subjects for blacks or whites.
|
For study 2 and phase 2 of study 1, the predicted BPs, obtained using the method described by Cui et al,28 were not significantly different between CYP3A5 genotypes in whites and blacks.
HOMA for whites in phase 1 of study 1 was significantly higher for the CYP3A5*1/*3 group (9.6±14.1) compared with the *3/*3 group (5.7±8.4; P=0.05). There were no differences in HOMA among the genotypes for blacks.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 CYP3A5*1 allele. CYP3A expression in the kidney is modest compared with the liver and is predominantly CYP3A5.15 There are several lines of evidence consistent with an association between CYP3A enzyme activity and BP or sodium retention. As early as 1975, it was shown that 6
-hydroxycortisol and 6ß-hydroxycortisol were higher by an average of 48% in patients with essential hypertension compared with normotensive subjects.29 However, no causative association was established, and there was no distinction between 6
-hydroxycortisol and 6ß-hydroxycortisol. More recently, Givens et al10 reported that in a group of 25 blacks, those possessing the CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype exhibited higher SBP and mean arterial BP and creatinine clearance. A higher creatinine clearance could reflect volume expansion or glomerular hyperfiltration. Volume expansion could in turn trigger a cascade that eventually leads to hypertension.30 The results from study 1 showed that there was no relationship between CYP3A5 genotype and creatinine clearance for whites or blacks. In view of the potential association between CYP3A5 expression and elevated BP, we sought evidence for such an association in a large group of subjects that had taken part previously in 2 well-documented studies. Part of our analysis of these studies supported the association of the CYP3A5*1 allele with increased BP, in agreement with the findings of Givens et al.10 First, study 2 showed that in blacks, there was a significantly greater proportion of those with the CYP3A5*1 allele in the hypertensive group (90%) than in the normotensive group (81%; P=0.025). Additionally, we found that in study 2 (Table 3; P=0.05), the CYP3A5*1 allele is associated with poor BP control, although the size of these subgroup analyses was small. A significant part of our analyses also contradicted the association of the CYP3A5*1 allele with increased BP. Phase 1 of study 1 showed that baseline SBP and mean arterial BP of blacks were higher for the group with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype when compared with the other 2, and some relationship persisted even after saline loading and furosemide administration (Figure). Although the age difference between the genotypic groups were not statistically significant, they may be clinically significant considering that the lowest mean age was 53 years (*1/*3 group).
In an attempt to adjust or correct for the effect of antihypertensive medications in study 2 and phase 2 of study 1, we used the method described by Cui et al. These analyses did not show any significant differences for both studies. One reason why these incremental adjustments in BP did not help is because our subjects were unrelated and different from those of Cui et al, whose subjects were related and came from 767 nuclear families. The fact that CYP3A metabolizes calcium channel blockers and not the other antihypertensive agents may also be a contributing factor. Of course it is possible that the CYP3A5 genotype is not related to BP. All the BP comparisons involving whites showed no association with the CYP3A5 genotype.
The seemingly different findings in studies 1 and 2 could be explained by the different demographic characteristics (Table 1). Study 1 had almost equal numbers of each gender but twice as many normotensives as hypertensives. Study 2 had approximately the same number of hypertensives and normotensives but 3x as many men as women.
It is interesting to note that for blacks in whom the CYP3A5 genotype showed a difference in BP, there was no difference in the proportions of salt-sensitive and salt-resistant subjects among the genotypes. In contrast, we found that there was a greater proportion of salt-sensitive subjects among the CYP3A5*1/*3 white hypertensives when compared with their *3/*3 counterparts.
As far as insulin sensitivity is concerned, although the euglycemic insulin clamp technique is still the gold standard in its assessment,24,31 HOMA correlates well with clamp-derived insulin sensitivity.24 In phase 1 of study 1, whites carrying the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype had a significantly higher HOMA was (indicating a lower insulin sensitivity or greater insulin resistance) than those carrying the *3/*3 genotype, even after adjustment for age and body mass index. Because CYP3A5 metabolizes cortisol, and cortisol reduces insulin sensitivity, we would expect those expressing this enzyme (those carrying
1 CYP3A5*1 allele) to be more insulin sensitive. However, our results showed the opposite. We are not aware of any information that would explain this phenomenon. It is also difficult to explain why there was no difference for blacks.
One limitation in study 1was that only those subjects who were able to complete a follow-up study (ie, they were still alive and still living within accessible distances to the university at the time of follow-up) and who consented to DNA analysis were included. Antihypertensive medications were also confounding variables (for both studies) because different subjects take different numbers and classes of these drugs. Finally, association studies were never intended to show causal relationships.
Perspectives
This study provided an alternative view of the effect of CYP3A5 genotype on BP. If this were later verified by additional research, we would have 1 more gene that could be predictive of hypertension, and the possibility that the CYP3A5 genotype has an effect on antihypertensive response could broaden our therapeutic options. The CYP3A5 genotype was also associated with insulin sensitivity as indicated by the HOMA. Because the genotype indicates the presence or absence of the CYP3A5 enzyme, it is possible that in the future we may be able to use CYP3A inducers and inhibitors to control BP and improve insulin sensitivity.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 9, 2004; first decision July 28, 2004; accepted November 11, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Arias E, Anderson RN, Kung HC, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD. Deaths: final data for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003; 52: 1115.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Arias E, MacDorman MF, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics-2002. Pediatrics. 2003; 112: 12151230.
4. Hoyert DL, Arias E, Smith BL, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD. Deaths: final data for 1999. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001; 49: 1113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). J Am Med Assoc. 2001; 285: 24862497.
6. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. J Am Med Assoc. 2003; 289: 25602572.
7. Timberlake DS, OConnor DT, Parmer RJ. Molecular genetics of essential hypertension: recent results and emerging strategies. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2001; 10: 7179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Lamba JK, Lin YS, Schuetz EG, Thummel KE. Genetic contribution to variable human CYP3A-mediated metabolism. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2002; 54: 12711294.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Xie HG, Wood AJ, Kim RB, Stein CM, Wilkinson GR. Genetic variability in CYP3A5 and its possible consequences. Pharmacogenomics. 2004; 5: 243272.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Givens RC, Lin YS, Dowling AL, Thummel KE, Lamba JK, Schuetz EG, Stewart PW, Watkins PB. CYP3A5 genotype predicts renal CYP3A activity and blood pressure in healthy adults. J Appl Physiol. 2003; 95: 12971300.
11. Hunt CM, Watkins PB, Saenger P, Stave GM, Barlascini N, Watlington CO, Wright JT Jr, Guzelian PS. Heterogeneity of CYP3A isoforms metabolizing erythromycin and cortisol. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992; 51: 1823.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Ghosh S, Grogan WM, Basu A, Watlington C. Renal corticosterone 6 beta-hydroxylase in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993; 1182: 152156.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Ghosh SS, Basu AK, Ghosh S, Hagley R, Kramer L, Schuetz J, Grogan WM, Guzelian P, Watlington CO. Renal and hepatic family 3A cytochromes P450 (CYP3A) in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Biochem Pharmacol. 1995; 50: 4954.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Watlington CO, Kramer LB, Schuetz EG, Zilai J, Grogan WM, Guzelian P, Gizek F, Schoolwerth AC. Corticosterone 6 beta-hydroxylation correlates with blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1992; 262: F927F931.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Haehner BD, Gorski JC, Vandenbranden M, Wrighton SA, Janardan SK, Watkins PB, Hall SD. Bimodal distribution of renal cytochrome P450 3A activity in humans. Mol Pharmacol. 1996; 50: 5259.[Abstract]
16. Haehner BD, Strong M, Hamman MA, Hall SD. The variable kinetics of cytochrome P450 3A isoforms in the 6ß-hydroxylation of cortisol. Pharmacologist. 1997; 39: 21.
17. Duncan RL, Grogan WM, Kramer LB, Watlington CO. Corticosterones metabolite is an agonist for Na+ transport stimulation in A6 cells. Am J Physiol. 1988; 255: F736F748.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Morris DJ, Latif SA, Rokaw MD, Watlington CO, Johnson JP. A second enzyme protecting mineralocorticoid receptors from glucocorticoid occupancy. Am J Physiol. 1998; 274: C1245C1252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Grogan WM, Fidelman ML, Newton DE, Duncan RL, Watlington CO. A corticosterone metabolite produced by A6 (toad kidney) cells in culture: identification and effects on Na+ transport. Endocrinology. 1985; 116: 11891194.
20. Weinberger MH, Miller JZ, Luft FC, Grim CE, Fineberg NS. Definitions and characteristics of sodium sensitivity and blood pressure resistance. Hypertension. 1986; 8: II127134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Weinberger MH, Fineberg NS, Fineberg SE. The influence of blood pressure and carbohydrate tolerance on vascular compliance in humans. Am J Hypertens. 2002; 15: 678682.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Weinberger MH, Fineberg NS, Fineberg SE. Effects of age, race, gender, blood pressure, and estrogen on arterial compliance. Am J Hypertens. 2002; 15: 358363.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Weinberger MH, Fineberg NS, Fineberg SE, Weinberger M. Salt sensitivity, pulse pressure, and death in normal and hypertensive humans. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 429432.
24. Radziuk J. Insulin sensitivity and its measurement: structural commonalities among the methods. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 85: 44264433.
25. Hiratsuka M, Agatsuma Y, Omori F, Narahara K, Inoue T, Kishikawa Y, Mizugaki M. High throughput detection of drug-metabolizing enzyme polymorphisms by allele-specific fluorogenic 5' nuclease chain reaction assay. Biol Pharm Bull. 2000; 23: 11311135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Hiratsuka M, Takekuma Y, Endo N, Narahara K, Hamdy SI, Kishikawa Y, Matsuura M, Agatsuma Y, Inoue T, Mizugaki M. Allele and genotype frequencies of CYP2B6 and CYP3A5 in the Japanese population. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 58: 417421.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Le Corre P, Parmer RJ, Kailasam MT, Kennedy BP, Skaar TP, Ho H, Leverge R, Smith DW, Ziegler MG, Insel PA. Human sympathetic activation by [alpha]2-adrenergic blockade with yohimbine: bimodal, epistatic influence of cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism. Clin PharmacolTher. 2004; 76: 139153.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Cui JS, Hopper JL, Harrap SB. Antihypertensive treatments obscure familial contributions to blood pressure variation. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 207210.
29. Kornel L, Miyabo S, Saito Z, Cha RW, Wu FT. Corticosteroids in human blood. VIII. Cortisol metabolites in plasma of normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1975; 40: 949958.
30. Blaustein MP, Grim CE. The pathogenesis of hypertension: black-white differences. Cardiovasc Clin. 1991; 21: 97114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Wallace TM, Matthews DR. The assessment of insulin resistance in man. Diabet Med. 2002; 19: 527534.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Canonico, E. Bouaziz, L. Carcaillon, C. Verstuyft, A. Guiochon-Mantel, L. Becquemont, P.-Y. Scarabin, and for the Estrogen Thromboembolism Risk (ESTHER) Stu Synergism between Oral Estrogen Therapy and Cytochrome P450 3A5*1 Allele on the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism among Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 3082 - 3087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Calhoun, D. Jones, S. Textor, D. C. Goff, T. P. Murphy, R. D. Toto, A. White, W. C. Cushman, W. White, D. Sica, et al. Resistant Hypertension: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research Circulation, June 24, 2008; 117(25): e510 - e526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Calhoun, D. Jones, S. Textor, D. C. Goff, T. P. Murphy, R. D. Toto, A. White, W. C. Cushman, W. White, D. Sica, et al. Resistant Hypertension: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1403 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yazdanpanah, Y. S. Aulchenko, A. Hofman, J. A.M.J.L. Janssen, F. A. Sayed-Tabatabaei, R. H.N. van Schaik, O. H. Klungel, B. H.C.H. Stricker, H. A.P. Pols, J. C.M. Witteman, et al. Effects of the Renin-Angiotensin System Genes and Salt Sensitivity Genes on Blood Pressure and Atherosclerosis in the Total Population and Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes, July 1, 2007; 56(7): 1905 - 1912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.H. Messerli, G. Mancia, C.R. Conti, A.C. Hewkin, S. Kupfer, A. Champion, R. Kolloch, A. Benetos, C.J. Pepine, K. Nakagawa, et al. Lowering of Blood Pressure--The Lower, the Better?: Dogma Disputed: Can Aggressively Lowering Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Be Dangerous? Ann Intern Med 144: 884-893, 2006 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 2345 - 2352. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |