Published online before print March 14, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000159191.98140.89
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2005;45:526.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
Stimulation of Endothelial Progenitor Cells
A New Putative Therapeutic Effect of Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists
From the Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Correspondence to Ferdinand H. Bahlmann, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Hannover Medical School Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail bahlmann.ferdinand{at}mh-hannover.de
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) correlates with endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk in humans. We explored whether angiotensin II receptor antagonist therapy affects the number of regenerative EPCs in patients with type 2 diabetes. In a prospective double-blind parallel group study, we randomly treated 18 type 2 diabetics with olmesartan (40 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. We analyzed circulating CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (flow cytometry) and EPCs (in vitro assay) before and after therapy. We verified the results in a second open trial treating 20 type 2 diabetics with 300 mg of irbesartan for 12 weeks. The number of EPCs was significantly lower in diabetic patients as compared with 38 age-matched healthy subjects (210±10 versus 258±18 per high-power field; P<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference with respect to hematopoietic progenitor cells. Treatment with olmesartan (n=9) significantly increased EPCs from 231±24 to 465±71 per high-power field (P<0.05), but not hematopoietic progenitor cells. In contrast, placebo treatment (n=9) did not affect EPCs and hematopoietic progenitor cells. With irbesartan therapy, EPC number increased significantly from 196±15 to 300±23 per high-power field (P<0.05) already after 4 weeks of treatment. At the end of 12-week therapy, patients had 310±23 EPCs per high-power field (P<0.05 versus baseline). Angiotensin II receptor antagonists increase the number of regenerative EPCs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This action may be of therapeutic relevance contributing to their beneficial cardiovascular effects.
Key Words: receptors, angiotensin II • endothelium • blood vessels • cardiovascular diseases
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In experimental studies using different animal models of cardiovascular injury and repair, bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been shown to be responsible for endothelial and hence vascular repair.1–6 Circulating EPCs incorporate into sites of active neovascularization, where they orchestrate re-endothelialization of damaged vessel walls, also by secreting a large number of cytokines that attract and govern cells that are indispensable in the process of vascular repair.7,8 Human data are even more intriguing, because in patients with coronary artery disease the number of EPCs correlates with the number of cardiovascular risk factors, and this correlation exists even in apparently healthy subjects without manifest atherosclerosis.9,10 In the latter population, the number of EPCs also significantly correlated with the degree of endothelial dysfunction.10 Moreover, in patients with clinical conditions known to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk such as type 2 diabetes mellitus or renal failure, the number and/or function of EPCs is significantly altered.11–13
Theoretically, EPCs can be expanded in vitro for therapeutic use,5,14 but currently this procedure is laborious and expensive. Experimental work and studies in humans have revealed that the number of functionally active EPCs can be increased by pharmacological intervention, however, eg, administration of statins15,16 and recombinant human EPO (rHuEPO) or its analogue darbepoetin.12,17,18 This finding could be of therapeutic relevance, because persistent stimulation of EPCs by targeted pharmacological intervention could, at least theoretically, repair endothelial injury and progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease in patients at risk. We have therefore explored the effect of angiotensin II subtype 1-receptor antagonist therapy on EPCs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a prospective double-blind parallel group study. We verified the results in a second open study.
|
Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The studies were approved by the Hannover Medical School Ethics Committee. We have obtained written informed consent from all participants. In a prospective double-blind parallel group trial, 18 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus randomly received placebo (n=9; age, 60.4±2.6 years; body mass index, 29.4±1.2 kg/m2) or 40 mg of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist olmesartan (n=9; 61.7±2.4 years; 30.0±1.6 kg/m2) for 12 weeks. They were normotensive, ie, sitting diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or had mild to moderate hypertension, ie, sitting diastolic blood pressure after washout between 90 and 105 mm Hg. Subjects with malignant disease, past cardiovascular events, or active inflammation were not studied. Antihypertensive drugs (if present) were completely washed out for at least 2 weeks before study entry. To achieve blood pressure control during the study period, ie, a sitting diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, hydrochlorothiazide (up to 25 mg per day) and atenolol (up to 100 mg per day) were added to the double-blind medication in both treatment arms. In a second open study, we treated 20 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (age, 64.5±1.4 years; body mass index, 32.7±1.4 kg/m2) who were normotensive or had mild to moderate hypertension with 300 mg of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan for 12 weeks. Antihypertensive drugs (if present) were washed out at least 2 weeks before the start of the study.
In all participants, the total number of circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) was analyzed by flow cytometry (Epics XL cytometer; Coulter Beckman) as described.12 The CD34 and CD45 expression patterns as well as the morphological qualities of progenitor cells were used for their detection after the gating strategy according to the ISHAGE guidelines.19 Two blinded investigators independently assessed the number of HPCs. Further, we assessed the number of EPCs using an in vitro assay as described in detail previously.12,13 In brief, we isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients blood using density gradient centrifugation with Bicoll (Biochrome and seeded 107 cells on 6-well plates coated with human fibronectin (Sigma) in endothelial basal medium (EBM-2; Clonetics). After 7 days in culture, we performed fluorescent chemical detection of the attached cells using 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine-labeled acetylated low-density lipoprotein (acLDL-DiI; Molecular Probes) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Ulex europaeus agglutinin-1 (UEA-1; Sigma) for cell staining. We viewed the samples with an inverted fluorescent microscope. We counted double-stained cells for both UEA-1 and acLDL-DiI as EPCs. Two blinded investigators counted at least 4 randomly selected high-power fields.
Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 12.01. Univariate comparisons of continuous variables within groups were performed by paired t test or the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test in case of non-normally distributed variables. For comparison of data from >2 time points we used ANOVA and corrected for multiple comparisons. Differences were considered as significant at P<0.05. Data are presented as mean±SEM.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The clinical data of 38 patients with type 2 diabetes and 38 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects are presented in the Table. Patients with type 2 diabetes had significantly higher body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and serum triglyceride levels. Moreover, as shown in Figure 1, the number of EPCs was significantly lower in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as compared with healthy subjects. In contrast, the number of CD34+ HPCs was not significantly different in diabetic patients compared with healthy subjects (1.88±0.13 versus 1.82±0.14 /µL; not significant).
|
|
Treatment with olmesartan markedly increased EPC number (Figure 2), whereas it had no effect on circulating CD34+ HPCs (1.89±0.32 versus 1.85±0.28 /µL; not significant). In contrast, placebo treatment did not affect EPCs (Figure 2) and HPCs (1.66±0.19 versus 2.00±0.23 /µL; not significant). Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly (P<0.05) and comparably in both treatment groups, ie, from 144±5 to 130±3 mm Hg in the olmesartan treatment group, and from 143±5 to 127±3 mm Hg in the placebo treatment group. Similarly, we observed a comparable decrease in diastolic blood pressure with olmesartan (from 98±2 to 86±2 mm Hg; P<0.05) and with placebo therapy (from 96±2 to 86±2 mm Hg; P<0.05).
|
50%, whereas placebo treatment did not affect EPCs. Data are presented as 95% confidence interval of the mean.We confirmed these results in the second open trial with irbesartan. Angiotensin II blockade significantly increased EPCs in 20 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from 196±17 to 300±28 per high-power field (P<0.05) already after 4 weeks of therapy. At the end of 12-week therapy, patients had 310±33 EPCs per high-power field (P<0.05 versus baseline), ie, EPC number increased to >50% above the pretreatment value. In contrast, we did not observe a significant effect of irbesartan on circulating CD34+ HPCs. Their number was 2.37±0.33 /µL at the start of irbesartan treatment, 2.05±0.31 /µL after 4 weeks, and 2.12±0.28 /µL at the end of treatment.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The results of the present study document that angiotensin II subtype 1-receptor blockade increases the number of EPCs in patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The effect seems to be a class effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonists, because we have demonstrated it with standard daily doses of 2 long-acting substances, namely olmesartan and irbesartan. To our best knowledge, angiotensin II receptor antagonists are the third drug group in cardiovascular medicine for which such evidence now exists. So far, an effect on EPCs has been proven only for statins15,16 and rHuEPO, and its analogue darbepoetin.12,18 Similarly, as for statins and rHuEPO, so-named pleiotropic effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists attract increasing interest in the cardiovascular community, including their antidiabetogenic and anti-inflammatory action.20,21 It is even hypothesized that ancillary effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists not related to their main action, ie, lowering of blood pressure, may contribute to their beneficial cardiovascular effects, particularly in patients with the metabolic syndrome.20–22 In this respect, we have to point out that the effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonists on EPCs in our diabetic patients was independent from their blood pressure-lowering action as documented by comparable blood pressure reduction achieved in the olmesartan and placebo (ie, cotherapy with hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol) treatment arms. In contrast, in patients treated with standard antihypertensives we did not observe an effect on EPCs.
Emerging data on the beneficial role of EPCs for cardiovascular repair make our results all the more relevant. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and most die of complications related to atherosclerosis.20,22 Several cardiovascular risk factors are thought to play a role, but the idea that impaired vascular repair mechanisms as a result of impaired function and/or reduced number of EPCs may contribute to the problem has been proposed only recently. Tepper et al11 have shown that EPCs from type 2 diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures in vitro. Our finding of significantly reduced EPC numbers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus further supports this hypothesis. Stimulating regenerative EPCs may therefore contribute to the beneficial cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II antagonists in these patients as well as in other populations with high cardiovascular risk. However, increasing the number of circulating endothelial progenitors might have also untoward effects. EPCs incorporate into the damaged vessel wall and can even promote vasculogenesis, ie, the spreading of new capillaries. Because we do not have detailed knowledge on EPC homing, this process may theoretically also destabilize plaques.
Interestingly, treatment with angiotensin II receptor antagonists induced an increase of EPC numbers above that found in healthy subjects, similarly as it has been shown for statin and rHuEPO therapy.12,15 The effect was evident already after 4 weeks of irbesartan treatment, and it was clearly demonstrable after 12 weeks of therapy with both angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Long-term studies have to prove whether such a marked stimulation of EPCs can be observed during chronic therapy with angiotensin II receptor antagonists. In addition, intracellular mechanisms involved in EPC stimulation by angiotensin II receptor antagonist have yet to be explored. Both statins and rHuEPO modulate EPC proliferation and differentiation via activation of the surviving intracellular Akt pathway.12,15–18 Elucidating the intracellular mechanisms of the effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonists on EPCs will generate additional knowledge on their pleiotropic effects.
It is not clear whether the increase of EPC number with angiotensin II receptor antagonists observed in our patients is a result of EPC mobilization from the bone marrow, or whether angiotensin II receptor antagonists stimulate EPC proliferation and differentiation, or both. This issue can be clarified only in experimental studies examining the effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonists on EPC differentiation within the bone marrow and on mobilization of circulating stem cells directly from the bone marrow. In this respect, we did not observe an effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade on CD34+ HPCs in our diabetic patients. However, CD34+ HPCs give rise to endothelial cells as well as to peripheral blood cells, eg, erythrocytes, leukocytes, and thrombocytes.
In conclusion, a standard therapy with angiotensin II receptor antagonists increases the number of regenerative EPCs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This action may be of therapeutic relevance contributing to their beneficial cardiovascular effects.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The studies were supported by unrestricted research grants from Sankyo Pharma Europe and Sanofi-Synthelabo.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
F.H.B. and K.d.G. contributed equally to the study.
Received November 28, 2004; first decision December 15, 2004; accepted February 2, 2005.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 221–228.
2. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Crosby JR, Kaminski WE, Schatteman G, Martin PJ, Raines EW, Seifert RA, Bowen-Pope DF. Endothelial cells of hematopoietic origin make a significant contribution to adult blood vessel formation. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 728–730.
4. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka-Moll WM, Silver M, Kearney M, Li T, Isner JM, Asahara T. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000; 97: 3422–3427.
5. Kawamoto A, Tkebuchava T, Yamaguchi J, Nishimura H, Yoon YS, Milliken C, Uchida S, Masuo O, Iwaguro H, Ma H, Hanley A, Silver M, Kearney M, Losordo DW, Isner JM, Asahara T. Intramyocardial transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization of myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2003; 107: 461–468.
6. Kocher AA, Schuster MD, Szabolcs MJ, Takuma S, Burkhoff D, Wang J, Homma S, Edwards NM, Itescu S. Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow-derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 430–436.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Rehman J, Li J, Orschell CM, March KL. Peripheral blood "endothelial progenitor cells" are derived from monocyte/macrophages and secrete angiogenic growth factors. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1164–1169.
8. Urbich C, Heeschen C, Aicher A, Dernbach E, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler. Relevance of monocytic features for neovascularization capacity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2511–2516.
9. Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Aicher A, Adler K, Urbich C, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Number and migratory activity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells inversely correlate with risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2001; 89: E1–E7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP, Schenke WH, Waclawiw MA, Quyyumi AA, Finkel T. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 593–600.
11. Tepper OM, Galiano RD, Capla JM, Kalka C, Gagne PJ, Jacobowitz GR, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2781–2786.
12. Bahlmann FH, De Groot K, Spandau JM, Landry AL, Hertel B, Duckert T, Boehm SM, Menne J, Haller H, Fliser D. Erythropoietin regulates endothelial progenitor cells. Blood. 2004; 104: 921–926.
13. De Groot K, Bahlmann FH, Sowa J, Koenig J, Menne J, Haller H, Fliser D. Uremia causes endothelial progenitor cell deficiency. Kidney Int. 2004; 66: 641–646.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Assmus B, Schachinger V, Teupe C, Britten M, Lehmann R, Dobert N, Grunwald F, Aicher A, Urbich C, Martin H, Hoelzer D, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction (TOPCARE-AMI). Circulation. 2002; 106: 3009–3017.
15. Llevadot J, Murasawa S, Kureishi Y, Uchida S, Masuda H, Kawamoto A, Walsh K, Isner JM, Asahara T. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor mobilizes bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 399–405.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Dimmeler S, Aicher A, Vasa M, Mildner-Rihm C, Adler K, Tiemann M, Rutten H, Fichtlscherer S, Martin H, Zeiher AM. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors increase endothelial progenitor cells via the PI 3-kinase/Akt pathway. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 391–397.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Bahlmann FH, DeGroot K, Duckert T, Niemczyk E, Bahlmann E, Boehm SM, Haller H, Fliser D. Endothelial progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation is regulated by erythropoietin. Kidney Int. 2003; 64: 1648–1652.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Heeschen C, Aicher A, Lehmann R, Fichtlscherer S, Vasa M, Urbich C, Mildner-Rihm C, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Erythropoietin is a potent physiological stimulus for endothelial progenitor cell mobilization. Blood. 2003; 102: 1340–1346.
19. Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I. The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother. 1996; 5: 213–226.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Beevers G, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Ibsen H, Kristiansson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Lindholm LH, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H; LIFE Study Group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002; 359: 995–1003.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Fliser D, Buchholz K, Haller H; for the EUTOPIA investigators (European Trial on Olmesartan and Pravastatin in Inflammation and Atherosclerosis). Anti-inflammatory effects of angiotensin II subtype 1-receptor blockade in hypertensive patients with micro-inflammation. Circulation. 2004; 110: 1103–1107.
22. Rosenson RS, Reasner CA. Therapeutic approaches in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in metabolic syndrome and in patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004; 19: 480–487.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Hypertension 2005 45: 491-492.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  F. H. Bahlmann, T. Speer, and D. Fliser Endothelial progenitor cells in chronic kidney disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 24, 2009; (2009) gfp643v1. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B. Gordon, A. M. Kahn, and J. C. Burns When children with kawasaki disease grow up myocardial and vascular complications in adulthood. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 17, 2009; 54(21): 1911 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Silvestre and B. I. Levy Circulating progenitor cells and cardiovascular outcomes: latest evidence on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors Eur. Heart J. Suppl., August 1, 2009; 11(suppl_E): E17 - E21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ueno, H. Koyama, S. Fukumoto, S. Tanaka, T. Shoji, T. Shoji, M. Emoto, H. Tahara, Y. Tsujimoto, T. Tabata, et al. Dialysis modality is independently associated with circulating endothelial progenitor cells in end-stage renal diseases patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 23, 2009; (2009) gfp358v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. H. Bahlmann and D. Fliser The plasticity of progenitor cells--why is it of interest to the nephrologists? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 2018 - 2020. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Muller, A. Kazakov, P. Jagoda, A. Semenov, M. Bohm, and U. Laufs ACE inhibition promotes upregulation of endothelial progenitor cells and neoangiogenesis in cardiac pressure overload Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2009; 83(1): 106 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. Leone, M. Valgimigli, M. B. Giannico, V. Zaccone, M. Perfetti, D. D'Amario, A. G. Rebuzzi, and F. Crea From bone marrow to the arterial wall: the ongoing tale of endothelial progenitor cells Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2009; 30(8): 890 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. You, C. Cochain, C. Loinard, J. Vilar, B. Mees, M. Duriez, B. I. Levy, and J.-S. Silvestre Hypertension Impairs Postnatal Vasculogenesis: Role of Antihypertensive Agents Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1537 - 1544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. T. Bloomgarden Diabetic Nephropathy Diabetes Care, April 1, 2008; 31(4): 823 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. F. Van Craenenbroeck, C. J. Vrints, S. E. Haine, K. Vermeulen, I. Goovaerts, V. F. I. Van Tendeloo, V. Y. Hoymans, and V. M. A. Conraads A maximal exercise bout increases the number of circulating CD34+/KDR+ endothelial progenitor cells in healthy subjects. Relation with lipid profile J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 1006 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Tongers and D. W. Losordo Frontiers in Nephrology: The Evolving Therapeutic Applications of Endothelial Progenitor Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 2843 - 2852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. P. Fadini, S. Sartore, C. Agostini, and A. Avogaro Significance of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Subjects With Diabetes Diabetes Care, May 1, 2007; 30(5): 1305 - 1313. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Thum, D. Fraccarollo, M. Schultheiss, S. Froese, P. Galuppo, J. D. Widder, D. Tsikas, G. Ertl, and J. Bauersachs Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Uncoupling Impairs Endothelial Progenitor Cell Mobilization and Function in Diabetes Diabetes, March 1, 2007; 56(3): 666 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Shantsila, T. Watson, and G. Y.H. Lip Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Cardiovascular Disorders J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 20, 2007; 49(7): 741 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Feihl, L. Liaudet, B. Waeber, and B. I. Levy Hypertension: A Disease of the Microcirculation? Hypertension, December 1, 2006; 48(6): 1012 - 1017. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Marumo, H. Uchimura, M. Hayashi, K. Hishikawa, and T. Fujita Aldosterone Impairs Bone Marrow-Derived Progenitor Cell Formation Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 490 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Chon, M. C. Verhaar, H. A. Koomans, J. A. Joles, and B. Braam Role of Circulating Karyocytes in the Initiation and Progression of Atherosclerosis Hypertension, May 1, 2006; 47(5): 803 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Werner and G. Nickenig Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Endothelial Progenitor Cells: Limitations for Therapy? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2006; 26(2): 257 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Zhang, A. Zhang, D.E. Kohan, R.D. Nelson, F.J. Gonzales, T. Yang, C. Schmidt-Lucke, L. Rossig, S. Fichtlscherer, M. Vasa, et al. Edema and Congestive Heart Failure from Thiazolidone Insulin Sensitizers--Excess Sodium Reabsoption in the Collecting Duct: Collecting Duct-Specific Deletion of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Blocks Thiazolidinedione-Induced Fluid Retention. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 102: 9406-9411, 2005 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 3139 - 3142. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. I. Levy Beneficial Effects of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells Activated by Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 491 - 492. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||