Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2005;45:1004-1011
Published online before print April 4, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000161995.64192.2b
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/5/1004    most recent
01.HYP.0000161995.64192.2bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qi, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qi, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, T. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Glucose intolerance

(Hypertension. 2005;45:1004.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

A New Transgenic Rat Model of Hepatic Steatosis and the Metabolic Syndrome

Nathan R. Qi; Jiaming Wang; Vaclav Zidek; Vladimir Landa; Petr Mlejnek; Ludmila Kazdová; Michal Pravenec; Theodore W. Kurtz

From the Department of Laboratory Medicine (N.Q., J.W., T.W.K.), University of California, San Francisco; Institute of Physiology (V.Z., V.L., P.M., M.P.), Czech Academy of Sciences and the Center for Applied Genomics, Prague, Czech Republic; and the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (L.K.), Prague, Czech Republic.

Correspondence to Theodore W. Kurtz, MD, Professor of Laboratory Medicine, UCSF Clinical Laboratories, 185 Berry Street, Suite 290, San Francisco, CA 94107. E-mail KurtzT{at}Labmed2.ucsf.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Fatty liver is extremely common in insulin-resistant patients with either obesity or lipodystrophy and it has been proposed that hepatic steatosis be considered an additional feature of the metabolic syndrome. Although insulin resistance can promote fatty liver, excessive hepatic accumulation of fat can also promote insulin resistance and could contribute to the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome. We sought to create a new nonobese rat model with hypertension, hepatic steatosis, and the metabolic syndrome by transgenic overexpression of a sterol-regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP-1a) in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). SREBPs are transcription factors that activate the expression of multiple genes involved in the hepatic synthesis of cholesterol, triglycerides, and fatty acids. The new transgenic strain of SHR overexpressing a dominant-positive form of human SREBP-1a under control of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) promoter exhibited marked hepatic steatosis with major biochemical features of the metabolic syndrome, including hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Both oxidative and nonoxidative skeletal muscle glucose metabolism were significantly impaired in the SHR transgenic strain and glucose tolerance deteriorated as the animals aged. The SHR transgenic strain also exhibited reduced body weight and reduced adipose tissue stores; however, the level of hypertension in the transgenic SHR was similar to that in the nontransgenic SHR control. The transgenic SHR overexpressing SREBP-1a represents a nonobese rat model of fatty liver, disordered glucose and lipid metabolism, and hypertension that may provide new opportunities for studying the pathogenesis and treatment of the metabolic syndrome associated with hepatic steatosis.


Key Words: hypertension • insulin resistance • liver • metabolism • rats • transcription, genetic


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
It is widely recognized that hypertension often occurs as part of a complex metabolic syndrome characterized by the clustering of multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including insulin resistance and dyslipidemia. The metabolic syndrome affects 15% to 25% of individuals in a variety of populations and is associated with significantly increased risks for cardiovascular mortality and for development of type 2 diabetes.1–3 Although the metabolic syndrome is frequently associated with obesity, the prevalence of this syndrome can also be remarkably high even in subjects that are not obese by Western standards.4–6

In addition to disturbances in blood pressure, glucose metabolism, and lipid metabolism, subjects with the metabolic syndrome often exhibit evidence of other disorders, including chronic inflammation, hypercoagulability, and liver abnormalities.7–10 The relationship between the metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease has recently begun to attract considerable attention.8,9,11 In subjects with clinical features of the metabolic syndrome, the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease can be very high even in the absence of diabetes, obesity, or abnormal liver enzymes. For example, Donati et al found that 30% of nonobese, nondiabetic subjects with hypertension, insulin resistance, and normal liver enzymes may have fatty liver.10 Moreover, 50% of subjects with pure fatty liver and up to 90% of subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis have the metabolic syndrome according to Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII) criteria.9 Although insulin resistance can be a determinant of fatty liver, it has also been suggested that hepatic steatosis may play a role in the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome and promote insulin resistance in liver and skeletal muscle.11–13 Some investigators have further proposed that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease be considered an additional feature of the metabolic syndrome.8 The availability of animal models with hepatic steatosis, as well as insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, could be valuable for studying the pathogenesis and treatment of the metabolic syndrome and its relationship to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

In the current study, we sought to create a nonobese rat model with hypertension, fatty liver, and the metabolic syndrome by transgenic overexpression of a sterol-regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). SREBPs are transcription factors involved in the regulation of fatty acid and lipid metabolism and can activate the expression of multiple genes involved in the hepatic synthesis of cholesterol, triglycerides, fatty acids, and phospholipids.14–16 Transgenic overexpression of SREBPs is also known to be an effective method for causing hepatic steatosis in rodents.14–16 In addition, genetic variants in SREBPs have been reported to be associated with increased risk for obesity, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia.17,18 We now report that transgenic overexpression of human SREBP-1a in the SHR induces hepatic steatosis and multiple biochemical features of the metabolic syndrome, including hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertriglyceridemia, in the absence of obesity. The transgenic SHR expressing human SREBP-1a may be a useful model for studying the relationship between hepatic steatosis and the metabolic syndrome and for investigating the pathogenesis and treatment of these very common and highly related clinical disorders.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Generation of Transgenic Rats
Transgenic rats overexpressing a dominant-positive form of human SREBP-1a were derived on the genetic background of the hypertensive SHR/Ola strain that harbors a mutant form of the CD36 fatty acid transporter. The SHR/Ola strain descends directly from the widely used SHR/NIH strain and was one of the original strains used to map the metabolic phenotypes linked to CD36 deficiency.19 Transgenic SHR were produced by microinjection of zygotes with a cDNA construct encoding amino acids 1 to 460 of human SREBP-1a under control of the rat PEPCK promoter, which produces high levels of gene expression in the liver20 (SREBP-1a construct kindly provided by J. Horton and J. Goldstein). The cDNA transgene generates a truncated form of SREBP-1a that can enter the nucleus without proteolysis and is not subject to feedback regulation.20 The attendant increase in nuclear SREBP-1a stimulates the hepatic expression of multiple genes involved in cholesterol and triglyceride synthesis, thereby resulting in a fatty liver.20

Transgenic SHR were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers specific for the human transgene: upstream, 5'-cac ccc tgt gtt agg cta c-3'; downstream, 5'-ttc atg gct gtc aga agc ag-3'. These primers generated a 29-basepair amplicon in transgene-positive rats but not in SHR transgene-negative controls. The presence of the transgene was further confirmed using a PCR primer set that co-amplified the human and rat genes encoding SREBP-1a but that generated different sized amplicons for the 2 genes. This primer pair bridged an intron in the endogenous rat gene that was absent in the cDNA transgene, thereby generating a larger amplicon from the endogenous rat gene ({approx}700 basepairs) and a smaller amplicon (484 basepairs) from the human transgene. The upstream primer for this PCR testing was 5'-ctt ccc tgg cct att tg-3' and the downstream primer was 5'-tct gga cct ggg tgt g-3'.

The first transgenic line obtained exhibited a fatty liver and abundant hepatic expression of the SREBP-1a transgene. This line was used in all studies and was compared with nontransgenic SHR controls (transgene-negative littermates or transgene-negative rats from the same SHR colony used to derive the transgenic strain). The rats were housed in an air-conditioned animal facility and allowed free access to food and water. All protocols were performed in agreement with the Animal Protection Law of the Czech Republic and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague or the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, San Francisco.

Phenotyping Protocols
Oral glucose tolerance testing was performed in young (age 10 weeks) and old (age 16 months) male transgenic SHR and male SHR controls after 2 weeks on a high-fructose diet (60% fructose) (K4102.0 diet; Hope Farms, the Netherlands). The oral glucose tolerance testing protocol was performed as previously described.21 A high-fructose diet was used because previous studies have shown that high-fructose diets can accentuate features of the metabolic syndrome in genetically susceptible strains of SHR.22 Two days after the oral glucose tolerance testing, serum levels of insulin, fatty acid, and triglyceride levels were obtained in the nonfasting state. In the 10-week-old rats, tissue samples were also obtained at the end of the study for measurements of soleus muscle glucose oxidation, soleus muscle glucose incorporation into glycogen, triglyceride levels in liver and skeletal muscle, and organ weights.

In a separate experiment, radiotelemetry measurements of arterial pressure were obtained from 17- to 21-week-old male transgenic SHR (n=9) and transgene-negative controls (n=9) fed normal rat chow. Subsets of these animals were euthanized in the nonfasting state at 22 to 25 weeks of age and serum samples obtained for measurements of leptin and adiponectin levels and tissue samples obtained for measurements of adipocyte size in epididymal fat according to the method of Di Girolamo et al.23 Liver samples were also obtained for histology in these rats and in a group of older (16 months) rats.

Expression Analysis of Transgenic SHR Rats
Real-time PCR analysis was used to detect tissue patterns of expression of the human SREBP-1a transgene and to quantify expression levels in fat and liver of several target genes of SREBP-1a that encode key enzymes involved in lipid metabolism, namely fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl coenzyme A desaturase 1 (SCD-1), and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase 1. The gene expression levels were assessed in 22- to 25-week-old rats that had been fed a high-fructose diet for 2 weeks. For real-time PCR, total RNA was isolated using standard methods and cDNA was prepared and analyzed by real-time PCR testing using QuantiTect SYBR Green reagents (Qiagen, Inc, Valencia, Calif) on an Opticon continuous fluorescence detector (MJ Research, Waltham, Mass) as previously described.21,24,25 Gene expression levels were normalized relative to the expression of cyclophilin (peptidylprolyl isomerase A), which served as the internal control, with results being determined in triplicate using the preferred method of Muller et al.26,27 For SREBP-1a target genes, the results in the transgene-positive rats (n=3) are displayed in comparison to the results in the transgene-negative rats (n=3). For the expression level of the human transgene encoding SREBP-1a, the results are displayed compared with the expression level of the endogenous rat gene encoding SREBP-1a. Expression of the transgene encoding human SREBP-1a was quantified using the following primers: upstream, 5'-tgc tga ccg aca tcg aag a; downstream, 5'-agg tgg aga caa gct gcc. Expression of endogenous gene encoding rat SREBP-1a was quantified using the following primers: upstream, 5'-gag cta ccc ttc ggt gag g; downstream, 5'-caa ata ggc cag gga agt ca. The primers used to quantify expression of the SREBP-1a target genes were: FAS upstream, 5'-cac atc aag tgg gac cac ag; FAS downstream, 5'-cga cca ggt agt ggt cag gt; SCD-1 upstream, 5'-tgt tcg tca gca cct tct tg; SCD-1 downstream, 5'-gga tgt tct ccc gag att ga; ACC upstream, 5'-acc tta ctg cca ttc cat gc; and ACC downstream, 5'-aag ctt cct tcg tga cca ga.

Skeletal Muscle Glycogen Synthesis and Glucose Oxidation
Glycogen synthesis and glucose oxidation were determined in isolated soleus muscle by measuring the incorporation of 14C-U glucose into glycogen and CO2 as previously described.21,25 The soleus muscles were attached to a stainless steel frame in situ at in vivo length by special clips and separated from other muscles and tendons and immediately incubated for 2 hours in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.4, that contained 5.5 mmol/L unlabeled glucose, 0.5 µCi/mL of 14C-U glucose, and 3 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (Armour, Fraction V) with or without 250 µU/mL insulin. After 2-hour incubation, 0.3 mL of 1 mol/L hyamine hydroxide was injected into the central compartment of the incubation vessel and 0.5 mL of 1 mol/L H2SO4 into the main compartment to liberate CO2. The vessels were incubated for another 30 minutes, and the hyamine hydroxide was then quantitatively transferred into the scintillation vial containing 10 mL of toluene-based scintillation fluid for counting of radioactivity. Measurement of insulin-stimulated incorporation of glucose into glycogen was determined after extraction of glycogen as previously described.21,25

Tissue Triglyceride Measurements
For determination of triglycerides in liver and soleus muscle, tissues were powdered under liquid N2 and extracted for 16 hours in chloroform:methanol, after which 2% KH2PO4 was added, and the solution was centrifuged. The organic phase was removed and evaporated under N2. The resulting pellet was dissolved in isopropyl alcohol, and triglyceride content was determined by enzymatic assay (Pliva-Lachema, Brno, Czech Republic).

Hemodynamic Studies
Arterial blood pressures were measured continuously in unanesthetized, unrestrained rats using radiotelemetry. All rats were allowed to recover for at least 10 to 14 days after surgical implantation of radiotelemetry transducers before the start of blood pressure recordings. Pulsatile pressures were recorded in 5-second bursts every 5 minutes throughout the day and 24-hour averages for systolic arterial blood pressure were calculated for each rat on each day of the study. The results from each rat in the same group were then averaged to obtain the group means. Blood pressure salt-sensitivity was also assessed by measuring arterial pressures during a 1-week period in which 1% NaCl solution was provided in place of drinking water.

Biochemical Analyses
Blood glucose levels were measured by the glucose oxidase assay (Pliva-Lachema) using tail vein blood drawn into 5% trichloracetic acid and promptly centrifuged. Serum nonesterified fatty acid levels were determined using an acyl-coenzyme A oxidase-based colorimetric kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Serum triglyceride concentrations were measured by standard enzymatic methods (Pliva-Lachema). Serum insulin concentrations were determined using a rat insulin radioimmunoassay kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech UK Ltd). Serum levels of leptin and adiponectin were determined using radioimmunoassay kits from Linco Research (St. Charles, Mo).

Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as means±SEM. Arterial pressures were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Individual group means for metabolic measurements were compared by t test. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Expression of the Human Transgene Gene Encoding SREBP-1a
Transgene-positive SHR and transgene-negative controls were identified by genotyping offspring derived from crosses of a founder male with transgene-negative SHR females. Real-time PCR analysis confirmed abundant hepatic expression of the human transgene encoding SREBP-1a compared with expression of the endogenous SREBP-1a gene (Figure 1). Lower levels of transgene expression could also be detected in other tissues, most notably in the kidney, with less in fat and heart (Figure 1). The greater transgene expression in liver relative to other tissues is consistent with the known expression pattern of PEPCK, which was used as the promoter to drive expression of the SREBP-1a transgene.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Gene expression levels. Top panel, Real-time PCR analysis of SHR transgenic rats showing tissue expression levels of the transgene for SREBP-1a (solid bars, n=3) compared with expression levels of the endogenous gene for SREBP-1a (open bars, n=3). Bottom panel, Real-time PCR analysis showing hepatic expression of SREBP-1a target genes in adult SHR transgenic rats (solid bars, n=3) compared with target gene expression levels in transgene-negative SHR control rats (open bars, n=3). Gene expression levels were determined in rats fed a high-fructose diet for 2 weeks and are normalized relative to the expression of cyclophilin.

Effects on Expression of SREBP-1a Target Genes
The expression levels of 3 target genes of SREBP-1a that regulate hepatic lipid metabolism were tested by real-time PCR analysis. In the SHR transgenic strain, the hepatic expression levels of SCD-1 and FAS were substantially increased relative to those in the SHR control strain, whereas the expression level of ACC was only marginally increased (Figure 1).

Real-time PCR analysis also showed increased expression of SCD-1 but not FAS or ACC in adipose tissue of the SHR transgenic strain (data not shown).

Metabolic Effects of Transgenic Expression of SREBP-1a in Young Transgenic Rats
In 10-week-old transgenic SHR fed a high-fructose diet for 2 weeks, serum concentrations of glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and fatty acids were all significantly increased compared with the SHR transgene-negative controls (Table 1). However, there was no significant difference in the area under the curve of the oral glucose tolerance test between the 10-week-old SHR transgenics and the age-matched SHR controls (Table 1 and Figure 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Metabolic Features of 10-Week-Old Transgenic SHR Expressing Human SREBP-1a



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) in young and old SHR transgenic rats and SHR controls. Left panel, OGTT in 10-week-old SHR transgenic rats (solid circles, n=9) and SHR controls (open symbols, n=8) fed a high-fructose diet for 2 weeks before study. Right panel, OGTT in 16-month-old SHR transgenic rats (solid circles, n=12) and SHR controls (open symbols, n=9) fed a high-fructose diet for 2 weeks before study. NS indicates no significant difference between the 2 groups in the area under the curve of the glucose tolerance tests. *P<0.01, significant difference between the 2 groups in the area under the curve of the glucose tolerance tests.

The transgenic SHR weighed {approx}10% less than the transgene-negative controls (Table 1). Epididymal and perirenal fat pad weights were also significantly reduced (P<0.01) in the transgenic SHR compared with the transgene-negative controls (Table 1). However, liver weight was significantly increased in the transgenic strain (Table 1). In addition, the transgenic SHR exhibited increased levels of triglycerides in liver and in soleus muscle compared with the SHR transgene-negative controls (Table 1). Hepatic levels of cholesterol were also significantly increased in the transgenic SHR compared with controls (Table 1). The changes in serum and tissue lipid levels induced by transgenic expression of human SREBP-1a in the SHR model are similar to those reported to be induced by expression of the same human SREBP-1a transgene in low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice.28

In soleus muscle isolated from 10-week-old transgenic SHR expressing human SREBP-1a, glucose oxidation and glucose incorporation into glycogen were significantly decreased compared with SHR transgene-negative controls either in the presence or in the absence of insulin (Table 2). Thus, basal and insulin-stimulated oxidative and nonoxidative glucose metabolism were impaired in skeletal muscle of transgenic rats compared with controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Glucose Metabolism in Isolated Soleus Muscle from 10-Week-Old Transgenic SHR

Metabolic Effects of Transgenic Expression of SREBP-1a in Old Transgenic Rats
To determine if glucose tolerance deteriorated with age, we performed oral glucose tolerance testing in 16-month-old transgenic SHR and in age-matched SHR controls after feeding a high-fructose diet for 2 weeks. In contrast to the results in the young rats, glucose tolerance was significantly impaired in the old transgenic SHR compared with age-matched controls (Figure 2 and Table 3). Serum glucose, insulin, and lipid levels were also significantly increased in the 16-month-old transgenic SHR compared with the SHR transgene-negative controls (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Metabolic Features of 16 Month Old Transgenic SHR Expressing Human SREBP-1a

Effects on Blood Pressure
Despite significantly lower body weights throughout the course of the studies (Figure 3; Table 1), the transgenic SHR exhibited frank hypertension with blood pressures similar to those in transgene negative SHR controls (Figure 3). The blood pressure response to salt loading in the transgenic SHR was also similar to that in the SHR controls (Figure 3).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Body weights and blood pressures in transgenic SHR and controls fed normal chow. Left panel, Body weights. Right panel, 24-hour average systolic arterial pressures determined by telemetry. Solid circles indicate transgenic SHR (n=9); open circles, SHR control (n=9). Arrows designate time when 1% NaCl was given in place of drinking water. ***P<0.001 compared with SHR control. Similar results were observed after fructose feeding.

Effects on Liver and Fat Pad Morphology and Adipocytokine Levels
Autopsy of 24-week-old rats maintained on normal chow confirmed the presence of grossly enlarged fatty livers and reduced adipose tissue stores in the transgenic strain compared with the transgene negative control (Figure 4). The mean liver weight of the 24-week-old transgenic rats, 18.2±0.9 grams, was significantly greater than that of controls, 12.8±0.3 grams (P<0.001). In the transgenic strain, histological analysis confirmed the presence of fatty liver as expected; however, there was no apparent increase in the amount of hepatic inflammation compared with the SHR control strain. However, distinct features of steatohepatitis were evident on histological analysis of livers from 16-month-old transgenic rats (data not shown).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Liver and fat pad weights in 24-week-old rats fed normal chow. In the transgenic SHR, liver weights were significantly increased, 18.2±1 grams, and visceral fat pad weights were significantly decreased, 0.9±0.08 grams, compared with the SHR control strain, 12.8±0.4 and 3.1±0.3 grams, respectively, ***P<0.001. Similar results were observed after fructose feeding.

Epididymal and perirenal fat weights in the transgenic strain, 0.9±0.1 grams and 0.6±0.04 grams, respectively, were significantly lower than in the transgene-negative control, 3.1±0.3 grams and 2.8±0.2 grams, respectively (both P<0.0001). Although adipose tissue mass was decreased in the transgenic strain, the average volume of adipocytes in the epididymal fat pads was significantly increased in the transgenic rats compared with controls, 405±18 picoliters versus 327±28 picoliters, respectively (P<0.05). The transgenic rats showed an increase in the percentage of large adipocytes with diameters >120 µm compared with SHR controls: 10% of adipocytes in the transgenics were >120 µm, whereas only 1% of the adipocytes were >120 µm in the SHR controls. Serum levels of leptin and adiponectin in the SHR transgenic strain, 1.9±0.3 and 2.2±0.3 ng/mL, respectively, were significantly lower than in the SHR control strain, 4.2±0.4 and 5.4±0.5 ng/mL, respectively (both P<0.005).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the current study in the most widely used rat model of essential hypertension, we have found that transgenic overexpression of a dominant-positive form of human SREBP-1a under control of the PEPCK promoter induces marked hepatic steatosis and biochemical features of the metabolic syndrome. Transgenic SHR exhibited fatty liver and hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hypertriglyceridemia compared with nontransgenic SHR. Oral glucose tolerance was similar in 10-week-old transgenic SHR versus SHR controls but became frankly abnormal in older transgenic rats. In addition to glucose intolerance developing, histological features of steatohepatitis developed in the older transgenic SHR. Progressive impairment in glucose metabolism is known to occur in humans with the metabolic syndrome and some studies suggest that insulin resistance further deteriorates as patients progress from fatty liver to nonacoholic steatohepatitis.29 The transgenic SHR were also characterized by impaired oxidative and nonoxidative glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle. However, the level of hypertension in the transgenic SHR was similar to that in the nontransgenic SHR despite lower body weights, reduced amounts of adipose tissue, and multiple disturbances in glucose and lipid metabolism. These findings suggest that the SHR transgenic strain represents a lipodystrophic form of the metabolic syndrome.

In both lean and obese individuals, ectopic deposition of fat in liver and muscle is widely suspected to play a role in the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome and diabetes by impairing hepatic and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism.30–32 Ectopic accumulation of fat has also been proposed to explain why patients with peripheral lipodsytrophy are at increased risk for insulin resistance and diabetes despite having decreased total body fat.30,33,34 In the current study, the transgenic SHR overexpressing SREBP-1a exhibited hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia associated with increases in skeletal muscle and liver fat, decreases in adipose tissue stores, and decreases in body weight. These findings, together with evidence of impaired oxidative and nonoxidative glucose metabolism in isolated soleus muscle of the transgenic SHR, suggest that the metabolic disturbances in this strain are at least partly related to disordered peripheral glucose metabolism secondary to the increased deposition of fat in skeletal muscle.

Although we did not assess hepatic glucose metabolism, it is likely that the marked hepatic steatosis is also impairing glucose metabolism in the liver. Studies across multiple animal models with hepatic steatosis have shown an inverse relationship between hepatic triglyceride content and insulin-mediated inhibition of hepatic glucose production.11 Moreover, Samuel et al have found that in rats fed a high-fat diet, hepatic steatosis and hepatic resistance to insulin-mediated suppression of endogenous glucose production precede the peripheral accumulation of fat in skeletal muscle and the development of muscle insulin resistance.13 The decreased leptin and adiponectin levels observed in the transgenic SHR could also be contributing to their metabolic disturbances, because deficiencies in these adipocytokines are known to promote impaired glucose metabolism in liver and skeletal muscle.35–38 Thus, in future studies in the transgenic SHR, it will be of interest to simultaneously determine the time course for development of fat accumulation and insulin resistance in liver and skeletal muscle and to determine whether supplemental administration of leptin or adiponectin can ameliorate the hepatic steatosis and metabolic status of the transgenic SHR.

In contrast to the results in transgenic SHR expressing SREBP-1a, transgenic mice that express the same SREBP-1a construct used in this study do not display typical biochemical features of the metabolic syndrome despite marked hepatic steatosis and significantly reduced amounts of epididymal fat.20,39 However, severe hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia develop when SREBP-1a is transgenically expressed on the genetic background of LDL low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice.28 Thus, when coupled with variants in other genes that influence lipid metabolism, changes in SREBP activity can have profound effects on circulating lipid levels. In the current study, we transgenically expressed SREBP-1a on the genetic background of the SHR that is known to harbor a spontaneous genetic defect in the CD36 fatty acid transporter.22,40,41 In previous studies, it has been shown that defective CD36 promotes increased susceptibility to insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in the SHR.22,40,41 These observations raise the possibility that the metabolic abnormalities in transgenic SHR expressing SREBP-1a may depend in part on the interaction between impaired fatty acid transport caused by mutant CD36 and disordered hepatic lipid metabolism caused by unregulated production of SREBP-1a. In future studies, it should be possible to test the potential role of defective CD36 in modulating the metabolic effects of transgenic SREBP-1a by expressing the SREBP-1a transgene on the genetic background of SHR with wild-type CD36.41 Studies in additional transgenic lines will also be helpful to insure that the metabolic disturbances observed in our model are secondary to overexpression of SREBP-1a and not simply caused by an insertional mutagenesis event caused by the transgene.

Increased blood pressure is an important cardiovascular risk factor that frequently occurs as part of the metabolic syndrome. In the current study, the severity of hypertension in transgenic SHR was similar to that in SHR controls despite lower body weights and reduced adipose tissue stores in the transgenic strain. Given that reductions in body weight often lead to reductions in blood pressure, this observation raises the possibility that the metabolic abnormalities (eg, reduced adiponectin levels) and/or hepatic steatosis might be serving to maintain some portion of the hypertension in the transgenic strain. However, it is also possible that the hypertension in this model of the metabolic syndrome is entirely accounted for by the increased blood pressure characteristic of the SHR progenitor strain. In future studies, it should be possible to test the hypertensinogenic effects of overexpressing SREBP-1a by transferring the SREBP-1a transgene onto the genetic background of a normotensive strain.

Paterson et al have reported that selective overexpression of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11ß-HSD1) in liver of normotensive mice can produce hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension in the absence of obesity.42 In the SHR transgenic rats overexpressing SREBP-1a, the hepatic expression of 11ß-HSD1 mRNA was similar to that in SHR controls (unpublished observations). Thus, it does not appear that the cardiovascular or metabolic effects of transgenic SREBP-1a are likely related to changes in expression of the gene encoding 11ß-HSD1. Nevertheless, the findings of Paterson et al support the possibility that primary alterations in liver function may have the capacity to elicit hemodynamic as well as biochemical disturbances characteristic of the metabolic syndrome.

Perspectives
Transgenic SHR overexpressing SREBP-1a could provide valuable opportunities for investigating pathogenetic mechanisms that may relate fatty liver disease to the metabolic syndrome. In addition, because this model has been created on the background of a strain with increased blood pressure and an inherited defect in fatty acid transport, it could aid in studying the interaction between hepatic steatosis and genetic risk factors for insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Finally, the availability of a rat model with hepatic steatosis and disordered glucose and lipid metabolism may also be helpful for investigating new therapies for fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors acknowledge the support by National Institutes of Health Grants HL35018, HL63709, and TW01236 to T.W.K., by grant 1M6837805002 from the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic to M.P., grant AV0Z 50110509 to the Institute of Physiology, and by grant 7403-3 from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic to L.K. Michal Pravenec is an international research scholar of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Received January 24, 2005; first decision February 10, 2005; accepted February 24, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. 2002; 288: 2709–2716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 427–436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Laaksonen DE, Lakka HM, Niskanen LK, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT, Lakka TA. Metabolic syndrome and development of diabetes mellitus: application and validation of recently suggested definitions of the metabolic syndrome in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 156: 1070–1077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Araneta MR, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E. Type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in Filipina-Am women : a high-risk nonobese population. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 494–499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Lee WY, Park JS, Noh SY, Rhee EJ, Kim SW, Zimmet PZ. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among 40,698 Korean metropolitan subjects. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004; 65: 143–149.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. St-Onge M, Janssen I, Heymsfield SB. Metabolic syndrome in normal-weight Americans. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 2222–2228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Devaraj S, Rosenson RS, Jialal I. Metabolic syndrome: an appraisal of the pro-inflammatory and procoagulant status. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2004; 33: 431–453.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Bugianesi E, Lenzi M, McCullough AJ, Natale S, Forlani G, Melchionda N. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a feature of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2001; 50: 1844–1850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, Cerrelli F, Lenzi M, Manini R, Natale S, Vanni E, Villanova N, Melchionda N, Rizzetto M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003; 37: 917–923.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Donati G, Stagni B, Piscaglia F, Venturoli N, Morselli-Labate AM, Rasciti L, Bolondi L. Increased prevalence of fatty liver in arterial hypertensive patients with normal liver enzymes: role of insulin resistance. Gut. 2004; 53: 1020–1023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. den Boer M, Voshol PJ, Kuipers F, Havekes LM, Romijn JA. Hepatic steatosis: a mediator of the metabolic syndrome. Lessons from animal models. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 644–649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Diehl AM. Fatty liver, hypertension, and the metabolic syndrome. Gut. 2004; 53: 923–924.[Free Full Text]

13. Samuel VT, Liu ZX, Qu X, Elder BD, Bilz S, Befroy D, Romanelli AJ, Shulman GI. Mechanism of hepatic insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 32345–32353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: transcriptional mediators of lipid homeostasis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2002; 67: 491–498.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109: 1125–1131.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Horton JD, Shah NA, Warrington JA, Anderson NN, Park SW, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Combined analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data from transgenic and knockout mice identifies direct SREBP target genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 12027–12032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Laudes M, Barroso I, Luan J, Soos MA, Yeo G, Meirhaeghe A, Logie L, Vidal-Puig A, Schafer AJ, Wareham NJ, O’Rahilly S. Genetic variants in human sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c in syndromes of severe insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004; 53: 842–846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Eberle D, Clement K, Meyre D, Sahbatou M, Vaxillaire M, Le Gall A, Ferre P, Basdevant A, Froguel P, Foufelle F. SREBF-1 Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in French Obese and Diabetic Cohorts. Diabetes. 2004; 53: 2153–2157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Aitman TJ, Gotoda T, Evans AL, Imrie H, Heath KE, Trembling PM, Truman H, Wallace CA, Rahman A, Dor C, Flint J, Kren V, Zidek V, Kurtz TW, Pravenec M, Scott J. Quantitative trait loci for cellular defects in glucose and fatty acid metabolism in hypertensive rats. Nat Genet. 1997; 16: 197–201.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Shimano H, Horton JD, Hammer RE, Shimomura I, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Overproduction of cholesterol and fatty acids causes massive liver enlargement in transgenic mice expressing truncated SREBP-1a [see comments]. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98: 1575–1584.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Pravenec M, Kazdova L, Landa V, Zidek V, Mlejnek P, Jansa P, Wang J, Qi N, Kurtz TW. Transgenic and recombinant resistin impair skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 45209–45215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Pravenec M, Zidek V, Simakova M, Kren V, Krenova D, Horky K, Jachymova M, Mikova B, Kazdova L, Aitman TJ, Churchill PC, Webb RC, Hingarh NH, Yang Y, Wang JM, Lezin EM, Kurtz TW. Genetics of Cd36 and the clustering of multiple cardiovascular risk factors in spontaneous hypertension. JClinInvest. 1999; 103: 1651–1657.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Di Girolamo M, Mendlinger S, Fertig JW. A simple method to determine fat cell size and number in four mammalian species. Am J Physiol. 1971; 221: 850–858.[Free Full Text]

24. Benson SC, Pershadsingh HA, Ho CI, Chittiboyina A, Desai P, Pravenec M, Qi N, Wang J, Avery MA, Kurtz TW. Identification of Telmisartan as a Unique Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist With Selective PPAR{gamma}-Modulating Activity. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 993–1002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Qi N, Kazdova L, Zidek V, Landa V, Kren V, Pershadsingh HA, Lezin ES, Abumrad NA, Pravenec M, Kurtz TW. Pharmacogenetic evidence that cd36 is a key determinant of the metabolic effects of pioglitazone. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 48501–48507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Muller PY, Janovjak H, Miserez AR, Dobbie Z. Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2002; 32: 1372–1374, 1376, 1378–1379.

27. Muller PY, Janovjak H, Miserez AR. Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real time RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2002; 33: 514.

28. Horton JD, Shimano H, Hamilton RL, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Disruption of LDL receptor gene in transgenic SREBP-1a mice unmasks hyperlipidemia resulting from production of lipid-rich VLDL. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 1067–1076.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Sanyal AJ, Campbell-Sargent C, Mirshahi F, Rizzo WB, Contos MJ, Sterling RK, Luketic VA, Shiffman ML, Clore JN. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: association of insulin resistance and mitochondrial abnormalities. Gastroenterology. 2001; 120: 1183–1192.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Cederberg A, Enerback S. Insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes—an adipocentric view. Curr Mol Med. 2003; 3: 107–125.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Bays H, Mandarino L, DeFronzo RA. Role of the adipocyte, free fatty acids, and ectopic fat in pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor agonists provide a rational therapeutic approach. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89: 463–478.[Free Full Text]

32. Kraegen EW, Cooney GJ, Ye J, Thompson AL. Triglycerides, fatty acids and insulin resistance–hyperinsulinemia. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2001; 109: S516–S526.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Reitman ML. Metabolic lessons from genetically lean mice. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002; 22: 459–482.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Reitman ML, Arioglu E, Gavrilova O, Taylor SI. Lipoatrophy revisited. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 11: 410–416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Unger RH. Minireview: weapons of lean body mass destruction: the role of ectopic lipids in the metabolic syndrome. Endocrinology. 2003; 144: 5159–5165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Matsuzawa Y, Funahashi T, Kihara S, Shimomura I. Adiponectin and metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 29–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Shimomura I, Hammer RE, Ikemoto S, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Leptin reverses insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in mice with congenital lipodystrophy. Nature. 1999; 401: 73–76.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Waki H, Terauchi Y, Kubota N, Hara K, Mori Y, Ide T, Murakami K, Tsuboyama-Kasaoka N, Ezaki O, Akanuma Y, Gavrilova O, Vinson C, Reitman ML, Kagechika H, Shudo K, Yoda M, Nakano Y, Tobe K, Nagai R, Kimura S, Tomita M, Froguel P, Kadowaki T. The fat-derived hormone adiponectin reverses insulin resistance associated with both lipoatrophy and obesity. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 941–946.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Sun L, Halaihel N, Zhang W, Rogers T, Levi M. Role of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 in regulation of renal lipid metabolism and glomerulosclerosis in diabetes mellitus. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 18919–18927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Aitman TJ, Glazier AM, Wallace CA, Cooper LD, Norsworthy PJ, Wahid FN, Al-Majali KM, Trembling PM, Mann CJ, Shoulders CC, Graf D, St Lezin E, Kurtz TW, Kren V, Pravenec M, Ibrahimi A, Abumrad NA, Stanton LW, Scott J. Identification of Cd36 (Fat) as an insulin-resistance gene causing defective fatty acid and glucose metabolism in hypertensive rats. Nat Genet. 1999; 21: 76–83.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Pravenec M, Landa V, Zidek V, Musilova A, Kren V, Kazdova L, Aitman TJ, Glazier AM, Ibrahimi A, Abumrad NA, Qi N, Wang JM, St Lezin EM, Kurtz TW. Transgenic rescue of defective Cd36 ameliorates insulin resistance in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Nat Genet. 2001; 27: 156–158.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Paterson JM, Morton NM, Fievet C, Kenyon CJ, Holmes MC, Staels B, Seckl JR, Mullins JJ. Metabolic syndrome without obesity: Hepatic overexpression of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 7088–7093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. Koska, N. Stefan, P. A Permana, C. Weyer, M. Sonoda, C. Bogardus, S. R Smith, D. R Joanisse, T. Funahashi, J. Krakoff, et al.
Increased fat accumulation in liver may link insulin resistance with subcutaneous abdominal adipocyte enlargement, visceral adiposity, and hypoadiponectinemia in obese individuals
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2008; 87(2): 295 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. Kallin, L. E. Johannessen, P. D. Cani, C. Y. Marbehant, A. Essaghir, F. Foufelle, P. Ferre, C.-H. Heldin, N. M. Delzenne, and J.-B. Demoulin
SREBP-1 regulates the expression of heme oxygenase 1 and the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase regulatory subunit p55{gamma}
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1628 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Pravenec and T. W. Kurtz
Molecular Genetics of Experimental Hypertension and the Metabolic Syndrome: From Gene Pathways to New Therapies
Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 941 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. Sugimoto, N. R. Qi, L. Kazdova, M. Pravenec, T. Ogihara, and T. W. Kurtz
Telmisartan But Not Valsartan Increases Caloric Expenditure and Protects Against Weight Gain and Hepatic Steatosis
Hypertension, May 1, 2006; 47(5): 1003 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/5/1004    most recent
01.HYP.0000161995.64192.2bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qi, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qi, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, T. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Glucose intolerance