Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2005;45:1012-1018
Published online before print April 11, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000164570.20420.67
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/5/1012    most recent
01.HYP.0000164570.20420.67v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sela, B.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sela, B.-A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*AMLODIPINE BESYLATE
*CAPTOPRIL
*FRUCTOSE
*IRON
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Glucose intolerance

(Hypertension. 2005;45:1012.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Fructose-Induced Fatty Liver Disease

Hepatic Effects of Blood Pressure and Plasma Triglyceride Reduction

Zvi Ackerman; Mor Oron-Herman; Maria Grozovski; Talma Rosenthal; Orit Pappo; Gabriela Link; Ben-Ami Sela

From the Hebrew University Hadassah Medical Center (Z.A., O.P.), Jerusalem; Tel Aviv University Sackler Faculty of Medicine (M.O-H., T.R., B.-A.S.), Institute of Chemical Pathology Sheba Medical Center (M.O.-H., B.-A.S.), Tel Hashomer; Department of Human Nutrition and Metabolism (G.L.), Hebrew University Medical School (Z.A., O.P., G.L.), Jerusalem; Ort Braude College of Engineering (M.G.), Karmiel, Israel.

Correspondence to Zvi Ackerman, MD, Department of Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital on Mount Scopus, P.O. Box 24035, Jerusalem 91240, Israel. E-mail zackerman{at}hadassah.org.il


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The most known risk factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the metabolic syndrome. In this study, we characterized changes in liver pathology, hepatic lipid composition, and hepatic iron concentration (HIC) occurring in rats given fructose-enriched diet (FED), with and without therapeutic maneuvers to reduce blood pressure and plasma triglycerides. Rats were given FED or standard rat chow for 5 weeks. Rats on FED were divided into 4 groups: receiving amlodipine (15 mg/kg per day), captopril (90 mg/kg per day), bezafibrate (10 mg/kg per day) in the last 2 weeks, or a control group that received FED only. FED rats had hepatic macrovesicular and microvesicular fat deposits develop, with increase in hepatic triglycerides (+198%) and hepatic cholesterol (+89%), but a decrease in hepatic phospholipids (–36%), hypertriglyceridemia (+223%), and hypertension (+15%), without increase in HIC. Amlodipine reduced blood pressure (–18%), plasma triglycerides (–12%), but there was no change in hepatic triglycerides and phospholipids concentrations. Captopril reduced blood pressure (–24%), plasma triglycerides (–36%), hepatic triglycerides (–51%), and hepatic macrovesicular fat (–51%), but increased HIC (+23%), with a borderline increase in hepatic fibrosis. Bezafibrate reduced plasma triglycerides (–49%), hepatic triglycerides (–78%), hepatic macrovesicular fat (–90%), and blood pressure (–11%). We conclude that FED rats can be a suitable model for human NAFLD. Drugs administered to treat various aspects of the metabolic syndrome could have hepatic effects. An increase in HIC in rats with NAFLD could be associated with increased hepatic fibrosis.


Key Words: amlodipine • bezafibrate • captopril • iron • nonalcoholic steatohepatitis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are increasingly recognized causes of liver disease and liver-related morbidity and mortality.1–3 The cause of NAFLD is multifactorial; however, the most known risk factor for NAFLD is the presence of the metabolic syndrome that includes insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus type II, obesity, dyslipidemia (mainly hypertriglyceridemia), and hypertension.1–7 Obesity and diabetes type II are considered risk factors for the development of the more severe manifestations of NAFLD, like NASH and cirrhosis.8,9 Recently, it has been suggested that to develop the more severe forms of NAFLD, 2 prerequisite conditions should exist: producing steatosis and a source of oxidative stress capable of initiating significant lipid peroxidation.10

In rats, moderate iron overload is known to enhance lipid peroxidation in the liver.11 Co-administration of iron and alcohol can facilitate the induction of significant liver injury and fibrosis.12 Hepatic iron overload is a relatively common finding in many patients with end-stage nonbiliary liver disease who do not have genetic hemochromatosis.13,14 However, it has been suggested that a mild increase in hepatic iron concentration in patients with NAFLD is associated with increased fibrosis.15 Moreover, it has also been suggested that the iron overload itself is responsible for the insulin resistance and iron depletion may even improve peripheral insulin sensitivity.16–18 Furthermore, it has been suggested that hyperinsulinemia seen in many patients with NASH may influence iron metabolism and may even increase iron pool that may again exacerbate liver injury.19 Improvement of glycemic control and other metabolic defects in patients with diabetes mellitus and NAFLD was reported to decrease hepatic iron concentration.20 Nevertheless, despite the ample presented evidence, there are a few groups of researchers that found no correlation between increased hepatic fibrosis and iron overload in patients with NAFLD.8,9,19,21–23

NAFLD has no definite medical therapy.1,2 In the absence of treatment modalities of proven efficacy, it is recommended to correct the risk factors for NAFLD and especially for NASH.1,24

In our laboratory, we are presently experimenting with the fructose-enriched diet (FED) rat model that is characterized by many components of syndrome X, like insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and hyperhomocystinemia.24–27

The aims of the present work were to characterize liver pathology and function, hepatic lipid composition and hepatic iron concentration (HIC), and fasting plasma insulin changes that occur in rats as a result of FED, with and without therapeutic maneuvers to reduce blood pressure and plasma triglycerides.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Forty-nine male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Laboratories Limited; Jerusalem, Israel) weighing 200±20 grams were studied. Rats were housed in regular cages situated in an animal room at 22°C, with a 14-hour light/10-hour dark cycle. Rats were maintained on standard rat chow diet (SRCD) (pellets #19520; Koffolk, Tel Aviv, Israel) and were given tap water to drink ad libitum. All animal studies were conducted according to the regulations for the use and care of experimental animals.

At the beginning of the study, rats were randomly divided into 5 groups. One group continued to be maintained on SRCD for 5 weeks, whereas the other 4 groups were given FED (TD 89247; Harlan Teklad, Madison, Wis) for 5 weeks. The FED contained (as supplied by Harlan Teklad) 20.7% (per weight basis) protein (as casein), 5% fat (as lard), 60% carbohydrates (as fructose), 8% cellulose, 5% mineral mix (#170760; R-H), and 1% vitamin mix (#40060; Teklad). This diet contains 50 mg of iron in 1 kg of diet. The SRCD contains (as supplied by Koffolk) 21.9% protein, 4.5% fat, 41% starch, 5% sugar, and 3.7% crude fiber. This diet contains 120 mg of iron in 1 kg of diet. Both diets were supplied in pellet form. Three weeks after the initiation of FED (while all components of syndrome X are already present), 3 out of 4 groups of these animals were given various additional pharmaceutical interventions for 2 weeks. One group was given amlodipine (15 mg/kg per day), another group was given captopril (90 mg/kg per day), and the third group was given bezafibrate (10 mg/kg per day). These medications were given in the drinking water. Systolic blood pressure (BP) was measured in conscious rats by the indirect tail-cuff method using an electrosphygmomanometer and a pneumatic pulse transducer (Narco Biosystems, Houston, Tex). The animals were kept at 37°C for 30 minutes before measurements were taken. The mean of 5 consecutive readings was recorded as BP. Blood samples were taken from a retro-orbital sinus puncture under light ether anesthesia from all rats after 5 hours of fasting. Triglyceride concentration was measured with an automatic analyzer (Olympus AU2700; Hamburg, Germany). Additional biochemical parameters from the end of the study period, such as albumin, liver enzymes, cholesterol, and glucose, were measured by dry chemistry method (Kodak, Rochester, NY). Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and transforming growth factor ß-1 were assayed by rat-specific RIA kits (R & D Systems). Insulin was assayed by a rat-specific RIA kit (Incstar, Stillwater, Minn). Insulin resistance was calculated by the Homeostasis Model Assessment score [fasting plasma insulin (µU/mL)xfasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)/22.5].28

Sections from the liver of each animal involved in the study were stained with hematoxylin & eosin for evaluation of necro-inflammatory grading, Masson trichrome stain for fibrosis and architectural changes, oil-red "O" for the evaluation of fatty droplets (macrovesicular or microvesicular steatosis), and with Perl’s Prussian blue for detection of iron. Histological changes were assessed by a modification of the scoring system for grading and staging for NASH described by Brunt et al29 (please see http://hyper.ahajournals.org).The histological evaluation of the liver sections was performed blindly.

Determination of Hepatic Lipids
Hepatic lipids (total lipids, phospholipids, triglycerides, and cholesterol) were measured as previously described.30–34

Determination of Hepatic Iron Concentration
Hepatic nonheme iron concentrations were measured by the method of Torrance and Bothwell.35

Statistical Evaluation
Results are expressed as mean±standard error. Comparisons between groups used 1-way analysis of variance with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test. P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Instant (Version 2.01; Mayo Foundation).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effects of FED
Baseline parameters did not differ between the rats that were scheduled for FED and the rats that were scheduled for further maintenance on SRCD. After 3 weeks, both groups had similar weight gain. However, the group on FED had 18% higher BP values, 188% higher plasma triglyceride levels, and 55% higher plasma insulin levels. After 5 weeks, the rats on FED again had similar weights but 15% higher BP, 223% higher plasma triglycerides, and 114% higher Homeostasis Model Assessment score than the SRCD rats (Tables 1 and 2Down). No change in liver enzymes was observed between both groups. However, the ratio of alanine to aspartate aminotransferase that was 1.2:1.0 in the SRCD group increased to 2.0:1.0 in the FED rats (Table 2). The livers of the FED rats had higher concentrations of total lipids (+28%), triglycerides (+198%), and cholesterol (+89%), but lower concentrations of phospholipids (–36%) than the livers of the SCRD rats (Table 3). The livers of the SRCD group had no signs of macrovesicular steatosis or evidence of fibrosis. Minimal microvesicular steatosis and minimal lobular and portal inflammatory changes were present. The livers of the FED rats showed evidence of mild to moderate deposition of macrovesicular and microvesicular fat with minimal signs of perisinusoidal fibrosis in 3 (out of 12) rats (Figure). The livers of both groups had similar HIC and stains (Tables 4 to 6 DownDown). There was no correlation between any histological change and HIC.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Body Weight, Blood Pressure, Triglyceride, and Insulin Levels During the Various Study Periods


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Week 5 Liver-Related Parameters, Plasma Biochemistry, and Cytokines


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Hepatic Lipids Composition



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Liver pathology in the various study groups. Photomicrographs of liver samples stained with hematoxylin & eosin and oil-red "O," respectively, in rats given standard rat chow diet (SRCD) (A, B), in rats on fructose-enriched diet (FED) (C, D), in rats on FED and amlodipine (E, F), in rats on FED and captopril (G, H), and in rats on FED and bezafibrate (I, J).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Hepatic Iron Content and Stain


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Liver Histology: Grading and Staging


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6. Distribution of Fibrosis among the Treatment Groups

Effects of Pharmacologic Intervention
Baseline and week 3 parameters did not vary between the 4 groups of rats on FED (Table 1).

Effects of Antihypertensive Medication
As expected, amlodipine and captopril caused a reduction in BP measurements in both groups of rats (–18% and –24%, respectively; Table 1). However, BP reduction was not the only effect observed in these rats. Amlodipine administration caused a reduction of plasma triglycerides (–12%) but no change in hepatic triglycerides and phospholipids. An increase in concentrations of hepatic total lipids (+43%) and hepatic cholesterol (+35%) was observed. This was accompanied with no significant histological changes (Figure and Tables 1 to 5UpUpUpUp). Insulin resistance improved.

In the group that received captopril, the alanine aminotransferase levels were the highest observed (Table 2). HIC, although insignificant, was increased (Table 4). Plasma triglyceride levels decreased (–36%) as well as hepatic triglycerides (–51%). Hepatic phospholipids concentrations increased (+37%) (Table 3). This was accompanied by a reduction of the macrovesicular fat score (–51%), but with no change in microvesicular fat score. Fibrosis, albeit minimal, was evident in 6 out of 8 rats that received captopril. (Figure and Tables 5 and 6Up)

Amlodipine and captopril administration caused an insignificant increase in transforming growth factor ß-1 levels (Table 2).

Effects of Bezafibrate
Bezafibrate administration caused a significant increase in the liver weight, as well as a modest increase in iron content (per total liver) but there was no change in HIC.

Bezafibrate administration caused a reduction in plasma (–49%) and hepatic (–78%) triglycerides concentrations and an increase in hepatic phospholipids (+41%). This was accompanied by a significant reduction in the hepatic macrovesicular steatosis (–90%) but no change in the microvesicular steatosis, inflammatory, or fibrosis score. A reduction in BP (–11%) and insulin resistance (–47%) was observed, too (Figure and Tables 1 to 6UpUpUpUpUp).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the present study, we demonstrated that Sprague-Dawley rats given FED are a suitable model for nonobese rats with NAFLD that present some aspects of the metabolic syndrome, such as hypertension, insulin resistance, and hypertriglyceridemia.1–7,27 To date there are no published controlled trials of effective treatment modalities for NAFLD. Treatment modalities have been directed toward reduction of weight, improvement of insulin resistance, lipid-lowering agents, and hepatoprotective drugs.1,2 In the present study, we investigated the hepatic effects of medications with known beneficial effects on few of the manifestations of the metabolic syndrome, like hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia.

Amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, in addition to its antihypertensive effects, has known favorable metabolic effects, like improvement of insulin resistance and decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.36,37 Furthermore, amlodipine has been found to have potent antioxidant activities38 and hepatoprotective effects.39 In the present study, we were not able to observe any hepatic beneficial effects. No favorable effects for amlodipine in patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis have been reported.40

Captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, has also reported metabolic effects. Captopril improves insulin sensitivity,41 has antioxidant properties,42 and is able to scavenge reactive oxygen species43 and to attenuate the progression of hepatic fibrosis in rats.44 In our study, captopril did not significantly improve insulin resistance; however, there was a significant reduction in plasma and hepatic triglycerides, with a decrease in the macrovesicular steatosis score. Surprisingly, there was a mild increase in HIC, which was accompanied by an increase in the fibrosis score. Plasma transforming growth factor ß-1 levels, a marker of hepatic fibrosis,45 were also increased. Although we did not directly examine the mechanisms responsible for the increased HIC in the rats treated with captopril, data from previous studies suggested that the change was not caused by increased absorption of iron from the gut46 but was probably attributable to increased hemolysis caused by captopril administration with deposition of iron in the liver.47 We may speculate that in the presence of iron, captopril is not able to inhibit iron ion-dependent generation of hydroxyl radicals from hydrogen peroxide43 and may even be a pro-oxidant.42 The presence of both increased HIC and the pro-oxidant properties of captopril could act together to increase the liver collagen synthesis in these rats.48 Our finding are supported the report of George et al that a mild increase in HIC is associated with increased fibrosis.15 Our finding that rats given FED and FED plus amlodipine had "normal" HIC indicates that increased HIC is not needed for the development of uncomplicated steatosis and hyperinsulinemia. Moreover, hyperinsulinemia itself may not cause an increase in HIC.

Hypertriglyceridemia was a prominent feature in the rats given FED. Hypertriglyceridemia is also a frequent finding in patients with NAFLD. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate as to whether reduction of high triglyceride may improve liver function or histology.49 In our study, bezafibrate reduced plasma and hepatic triglycerides, which was accompanied by a significant reduction in macrovesicular steatosis score, without a significant increase in microvesicular steatosis score. Moreover, a decrease in BP and insulin resistance was also observed. Administration of bezafibrate to humans with the metabolic syndrome and fenofibrate to rats given FED caused amelioration of many aspects of the metabolic syndrome.50,51 It has been demonstrated that fenofibrate, which, like bezafibrate, is a ligand to peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-{alpha}, induces enzyme expression related to ß-oxidation and the enhancement of mitochondrial gene expression.51 Other peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-{alpha} agonists may enhance lipid turnover and prevent the development of steatohepatitis.52

A lesser known metabolic effect of fibrates is their role in iron homeostasis and metabolism. Fibrates may suppress transferrin expression, reduction of hepatic iron efflux, and cause an increase of free iron pool within the liver.53 These effects are probably needed to conserve iron for the synthesis of a variety of iron-containing enzymes that are upregulated by the fibrates.51,53 In our study, the increase in iron liver content in the bezafibrate-treated rats was not accompanied by an increase in hepatic fibrosis. It may be suggested that because in these rats the increase in the total hepatic iron content was not accompanied by an increase in the HIC, no increased toxicity from the iron excess was noted.

The levels of plasma tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} were low in all rats, including those given FED. It may be speculated that the levels of this cytokine were low because that the rats were examined in an early phase of the disease progression (not yet with overt NASH).

Perspectives
This study demonstrates that the model of fructose-treated rats can be a suitable model for studying various aspects of human NAFLD. An increase in hepatic iron concentration in rats with NAFLD may be associated with increased hepatic fibrosis.

Drugs administered to subjects to treat the various aspects of the metabolic syndrome associated with NAFLD may have additional unexpected metabolic and hepatic effects. Physicians taking care of patients with the metabolic syndrome should be aware that such events may occur and monitor their patients appropriately. Human data that such events are possible are emerging.45

Received November 16, 2004; first decision December 8, 2004; accepted March 21, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Sanyal AJ. AGA technical review on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002; 123: 1705–1725.[CrossRef]

2. Angulo P. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1221–1231.[Free Full Text]

3. Green RM. NASH-Hepatic metabolism and not simply the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003; 38: 14–17.

4. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, Cerrelli F, Lenzi M, Manini R, Natale S, Vanni E, Villanova N, Melchionda N, Rizzetto M. Non-alcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003; 37: 917–923.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Chitturi S, Abeygunesekera S, Farrell GC, Holmes-Walker J, Hui JM, Fung C, Karim R, Lin R, Samarasinghe D, Liddle C, Weltman M, George J. NASH and insulin resistance, insulin hypersecretion and specific association with the insulin resistance syndrome. Hepatology. 2002; 35: 373–379.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Sanyal AJ, Campbell-Sargent C, Mirshahi F, Rizzo WB, Contos MJ, Sterling RK, Luketic VA, Shiffman ML, Clore JN. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: Association of insulin resistance and mitochondrial abnormalities. Gastroenterology. 2001; 120: 1183–1192.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Musso G, Gambino R, De Michieli F, Cassader M, Rizzetto M, Durazzo F, Faga F, Silli B, Pagono G. Dietary habits and their relations to insulin resistance and postprandial lipemia in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2003; 37: 909–916.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Angulo P, Keach JC, Batts KP, Lindor KD. Independent predictors of liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 1999; 30: 1356–1362.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Bacon RB, Farahvash MJ, Janney CG, Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: An expanded clinical entity. Gastroenterology. 1994; 107: 1103–1109.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Day CP, James OFW. Steatohepatitis: A tale of two "hits"? Gastroenterology. 1998; 114: 842–845.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Fischer JG, Glauert HP, Yin T, Sweeney-Reeves ML, Larmonier N, Black MC. Moderate iron overload enhances lipid peroxidation in livers of rats but does not affect NF-KB activation induced by the peroxisome proliferation Wy-14,643. J Nutr. 2002; 132: 2525–2531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Tsukamoto H, Horne W, Kamimura S, Niemela O, Parkkila S, Yla-Herttuala S, Brittenham GM. Experimental liver cirrhosis induced by alcohol and iron. J Clin Invest. 1995; 96: 620–630.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Ludwig J, Hashimoto E, Porayko MK, Moyer TP, Baldus WP. Hemosiderosis in cirrhosis: A study of 447 native livers. Gastroenterology. 1997; 112: 882–888.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Cotler SJ, Bronner MP. Press RD, Carlson TH, Perkins JD, Emond MJ, Kowdley KV. End-stage liver disease without hemochromatosis associated with elevated hepatic iron index. J Hepatol. 1999; 29: 257–262.

15. George DK, Goldwurm S, MacDonald GA, Cowley LL, Walker NI, Ward PJ, Jazwinska EC, Powell LW. Increased hepatic iron concentration in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with increased fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 1988; 114: 311–318.

16. Mendler MH, Turlin B, Moirand R, Jouanolle AM. Sapey T, Guyader D, Le Gall JV, Brissot P, David V, Deugnier Y. Insulin resistance-associated hepatic iron overload. Gastroenterology. 1999; 117: 1155–1163.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Fernández-Real JM, Penarroja G, Gastro A, Garcia-Brazado F, Hernández-Aguado I, Ricant W. Blood letting in high ferritin type 2 diabetes. Effects on insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function. Diabetes. 2002; 41: 1000–1004.

18. Facchini FS, Hua NW, Stoohs RA. Effect of iron depletion in carbohydrate-intolerant patients with clinical evidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002; 122: 931–939.[CrossRef]

19. Bonkovsky HL, Jawaid Q, Tortorelli K, LeClair P. Cobb J, Lambrecht RW, Banner B. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and iron: Increased prevalence of mutations of the HFE gene in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 1999; 31: 421–429.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Vigano M, Vergani A, Trombini P, Pozzi M, Paleari F, Piperno A. Insulin resistance influences iron metabolism and hepatic steatosis in type II diabetes. Gastroenterology. 2000; 118: 986–987.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Bacon BR, Matteoni CA, Boparai N, O’Neill R, McCullough AJ. Hepatic iron and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 1999; 30: 847–850.[CrossRef]

22. Chitturi S, Weltman M, Farrell GC, McDonald D, Liddle C, Samarasingbe D, Lin R, Abeygunasekera S, George J. HFE mutations, hepatic iron and fibrosis: Ethnic-specific association of NASH with C282Y but not with fibrotic severity. Hepatology. 2002; 36: 142–149.

23. Deguti MM, Sipahi AM, Gayotto LC, Pal cios SA, Bittencourt PL, Goldberg AC, Laudanna AA, Carrilho FJ, Can ado EL. Lack of evidence for the pathogenic role of iron and HFE gene mutations in Brazilian patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003; 36: 739–745.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Koteish A, Diehl AM. Animal models of steatohepatitis. Best Practice & Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2002; 16: 679–690.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Poulson R. Morphological changes of organs after sucrose or fructose feeding. Prog Biochem Pharmacol. 1986; 21: 104–134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Reaven GM. Insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia and hypertriglyceridemia in the etiology and clinical course of hypertension. Am J Med. 1991; 90 (Suppl 2A): S7–S12.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Oron-Herman M, Rosenthal T, Sela BA. Hyperhomocysteinemia as a component of syndrome X. Metabolism. 2003; 52: 1491–1495.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M, Bonadonna RC, Saggiani F, Zenere MB, Monauni T, Muggeo M. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 57–63.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94: 2467–2474.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Folch J, lees M, Sloane Stanly GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957; 226: 497–509.[Free Full Text]

31. Barnes H, Blackstock J. Estimation of lipids in marine animals and tissues: Detailed investigation of the sulphophosphovaniliun method for total lipids. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol. 1973; 12: 103–118.[CrossRef]

32. Bartlett GR. Colorimetric assay methods for free and phosphorylated glyceric acids. J Biol Chem. 1959; 234: 469–471.[Free Full Text]

33. Gottfried SP, Rosenberg B. Improved manual spectrophotometric procedure for determination of triglycerides. Clin Chem. 1973; 19: 1077–1078.[Abstract]

34. Taylor RP, Broccoli AV, Grisham CM. Enzymatic and colorimetric determination of total serum cholesterol. An undergraduate biochemistry laboratory experiment. J Chem Educ. 1978; 55: 36–64.

35. Torrance JD, Bothwell TH. A simple technique for measuring storage iron concentrations in formalinized liver samples. S Afr J Med Sci. 1968; 33: 9–11.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Masuo K, Mikami H, Ogihara T, Tuck ML. Weight reduction and pharmacologic treatment in obese hypertensives. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14: 530–538.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Lender D, Arauz-Pacheco C, Breen L, Mora-Mora P, Raminez LC, Raskin P. A double-blind comparison of the effects of amlodipine and enalapril on insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 1999; 12: 298–303.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Mason RP, Mak IT, Trumbore MO, Mason PE. Antioxidant properties of calcium antagonists related to membrane biophysical interactions. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84 (4A): 16L–22L.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Deakin CD, Fagan E, Williams R. Cytoprotective effects of calcium channel blockers. Mechanisms and potential applications in hepatocellular injury. J Hepatol. 1991; 12: 251–255.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Bird GLA, Prach AT, McMahon AD, Forrest JAH, Mills PR, Danesh BJ. Randomised controlled double-blind trial of calcium channel antagonist amlodipine in the treatment of acute alcoholic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1998; 28: 194–198.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Moises RS, Carvalho CR, Shiota D, Saad MJ. Evidence for a direct effect of captopril on early steps of insulin action in BC3H-1 myocytes. Metabolism. 2003; 52: 273–278.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Bartosz Kedziora J, Bartosz G. Antioxidant and proxidant properties of captopril and enalapril. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997; 23: 729–735.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Aruoma OI, Akanmu D, Cecchini R, Halliwell B. Evaluation of the ability of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor captopril to scavenge reactive species. Chem Biol Interact. 1991; 77: 303–314.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Jonsson JR, Clouston AD, Ando Y, Kelemen LI, Horn MJ, Adamson MD, Purdie DM, Powell EE. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition attenuates the progression of rat hepatic fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2001; 121: 148–155.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Yokohoma S, Yoneda M, Haneda M, Okamoto S, Okada M, Aso K, Hasegawa T, Takusashi Y, Miyokowa N, Nakamura K. Therapeutic efficacy of angiotensin 2 receptor antagonist in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatits. Hepatology. 2004; 40: 1222–1225.[CrossRef]

46. Schaefer JP, Tam Y, Hasinoff BB, Tawfik S, Peng Y, Reimche L, Campbell NR. Ferrous sulphate interacts with captopril. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 46: 377–381.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Hashimoto K, Imai K, Yoshimura S, Ohtaki T. Twelve month studies on the chronic toxicity of captopril in rats. J Toxicol Sci. 1981; Suppl 2: 215–246.

48. Gardi C, Arezzini B, Fortino V, Comporti M. Effect of free iron on collagen synthesis, cell proliferation and MMP-2 expression in rat hepatic stellate cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002; 64: 1139–1145.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

49. Laurin J, Lindor KD, Crippin JS, Gossard A, Gores GJ, Ludwig J, Rakela J, McGill DB. Ursodeoxycholic acid or clofibrate in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A pilot study. Hepatology. 1996; 23: 1464–1467.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

50. Kim JI, Tsujino T, Fujioka Y, Saito K, Yokoyama M. Bezafibrate improves hypertension and insulin sensitivity in humans. Hypertens Res. 2003; 26: 307–313.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

51. Nagai Y, Nishio Y, Nakamura T, Maegawa H, Kikkawa R, Kashiwagi A. Amelioration of high fructose-induced metabolic derangement of activation of PPAR{alpha}. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 282: E1180–E1190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Ip E, Farrell GC, Robertson G, Hall P, Kirsch R, Leclercq I. Central role of PPAR{alpha}-dependent hepatic lipid turnover in dietary steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatology. 2003; 38: 123–132.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

53. Huan HL, Shaw NS. Role of hypolipidemic drug clofibrate in altering iron regulatory proteins IRP1 and IRP2 activities and hepatic iron metabolism in rats fed a low iron diet. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2002; 180: 118–128.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. J. Johnson, S. E. Perez-Pozo, Y. Y. Sautin, J. Manitius, L. G. Sanchez-Lozada, D. I. Feig, M. Shafiu, M. Segal, R. J. Glassock, M. Shimada, et al.
Hypothesis: Could Excessive Fructose Intake and Uric Acid Cause Type 2 Diabetes?
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2009; 30(1): 96 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Thuy, R. Ladurner, V. Volynets, S. Wagner, S. Strahl, A. Konigsrainer, K.-P. Maier, S. C. Bischoff, and I. Bergheim
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Humans Is Associated with Increased Plasma Endotoxin and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 Concentrations and with Fructose Intake
J. Nutr., August 1, 2008; 138(8): 1452 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
I. Aeberli, M. B Zimmermann, L. Molinari, R. Lehmann, D. l'Allemand, G. A Spinas, and K. Berneis
Fructose intake is a predictor of LDL particle size in overweight schoolchildren
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 1174 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/5/1012    most recent
01.HYP.0000164570.20420.67v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sela, B.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sela, B.-A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*AMLODIPINE BESYLATE
*CAPTOPRIL
*FRUCTOSE
*IRON
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Glucose intolerance