| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2005;45:874.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, University of Western Australia and the Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia.
Correspondence to Dr Renate Zilkens, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Rear 50 Murray Street, GPO Box X2213, Perth WA 6847, Australia. E-mail renate{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40 grams alcohol as either red wine or beer for 4 weeks results in similar increases in systolic BP and HR. De-alcoholized red wine did not lower BP, and neither red wine nor de-alcoholized red wine influenced vascular function, suggesting that red wine polyphenolics do not have a significant role in mitigating the blood pressure-elevating effects of alcohol in men.
Key Words: alcohol blood pressure endothelin endothelium heart rate human vasodilation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Such a hypothesis, however, also has to consider the well-known positive linear relationship between alcohol intake and blood pressure (BP) in regular alcohol drinkers, a relationship that was first documented in 1915 in predominantly wine-drinking French troops serving on the Western front.8 Intervention studies since have consistently shown a BP-raising effect of alcohol, which is reversible in both normotensive9 and hypertensive10 subjects. However, evidence that the type of alcoholic beverage consumed may influence the magnitude of this BP-raising effect comes primarily from cross-sectional epidemiological data1114 with studies from the USA,11 Norway,12 France, and Northern Ireland,14 all suggesting that beer and spirit consumption may be associated with higher BP (particularly systolic) than wine consumption. In the London Civil Servant study,13 an inverse association between wine and BP was seen, but only in men who drank at least 4 glasses of wine each day.
Patterns of alcohol intake can influence BP.15,16 Consequently, comparing episodic beer drinkers with regular daily wine drinkers might obscure the relationship between alcohol intake and BP levels. Furthermore, preference for a beverage type has dietary17 and several other lifestyle correlates related to BP.18 Although epidemiological studies have generally adjusted for conventional risk factors such as weight, age, and smoking, these other potential confounders have not been factored into previous analyses, thereby weakening the argument for a specific and independent association of wine intake with lower BP.
Animal19 and in vitro studies2024 also suggest that red wine may modulate vascular function. The vasodilating agents in red wines, grape juices, and grape skin extracts appear to be polyphenolic flavonoids, which are thought to mediate relaxation by nitric oxide mechanisms.2225 Further in vitro evidence also suggests that red wine polyphenols may inhibit the synthesis of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictor,26 whereas animal data suggest that alcohol can increase ET-1 levels.2729 Hence, it is difficult to predict what the overall net effect of red wine, which contains both alcohol and polyphenols, might be on ET-1 levels.
Given the epidemiological data and the potentially vasoactive constituents in red wine, the aim of the present study was therefore to determine the relative effects of regular beer consumption compared with red wine or de-alcoholized red wine on both vascular function (FMD) and BP.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design
After a 2-week run-in period during which subjects abstained from alcohol, they were randomized using a random number table in combination with a block assignment schedule into a 4-period open-label crossover study. The 4 interventions included: abstention from all alcohol and grape products (control period), 375 mL red wine (Jacobs Creek Shiraz-Cabernet 13% alcohol/vol, 2023 mg/L polyphenols), 375 mL of the same red wine that had been de-alcoholized by Vinpac International and Australian Vintage (South Australia) using spinning cone column technology (0% alcohol/vol, 2094 mg/L polyphenols), and 3x375 mL cans Emu Bitter beer (4.6% alcohol/vol, The Swan Brewery Co Pty Ltd) each day for 4 weeks. Red wine was made with grapes destemmed before crushing and ferments remaining on skins for 6 days. Throughout the 18-week study, subjects were asked to maintain their usual food intake, restrict their tea intake (
2 cups/d), avoid any antioxidant supplementation or over-the-counter medication, and not consume alcoholic beverages other than those provided. Weekly telephone contact was maintained to optimize compliance with protocol. Study outcomes were evaluated during the last 3 days of the baseline run-in period (ie, end of week 2) and each intervention (ie, end of weeks 6, 10, 14, and 18). Because of the nature of the interventions, neither the subjects nor the investigators were blinded to treatment.
Ambulatory BP Monitoring
The 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed with an automated noninvasive oscillometric device (Spacelab 90207; SpaceLabs, Inc, Redmond, Wash). Spacelabs were programmed to read at 20-minute intervals in waking hours and 30-minute intervals while asleep. An appropriately sized cuff was placed on the nondominant arm and initial readings performed while subjects were at the research unit were discarded from analysis. The 50 to 68 BP readings [median 63 (interquartile range, 3)] obtained on each subject were aggregated to calculate average hourly results. Subjects were asked to document when they were asleep and awake.
Endothelial Function
Endothelial function was assessed twice at the end of each intervention by ultrasound measurement of endothelium-dependent postischemic FMD of the brachial artery using ultrasonography (ACUSON Aspen 128 ultrasound device; Acuson Corporation) after an overnight fast as previously detailed.30 Glyceryl trinitrate-mediated dilatation was measured to assess endothelium-independent dilatation. The ultrasound scans were analyzed by 2 observers blinded to subject identity and study phase. The coefficient of variation (CV) for repeated within-subject measurement was 19.4% and 15.8% for FMD and glyceryl trinitrate-mediated dilatation, respectively.
ET-1
Aliquots of urine from 24-hour urine collections were stored at 80°C until batch-analyzed by radioimmunoassay after extraction using Amprep C2 columns as previously described.31
Assessment of Phenolic Compounds by Gas ChromatographyMass Spectrometry in Urine
Urinary phenolic acids were measured as previously described, with minor modifications.32 Aliquots from 24-hour urine collections were stored at 80°C until the end of the study. All samples from each subject were assayed in the one batch.
Biochemical Analyses
Blood was collected after an overnight fast. Serum samples were analyzed on the day of venipuncture by Core Laboratory Services, Royal Perth Hospital, using the Hitashi 917 Biochemical Analyser (Hitachi Limited, Tokyo, Japan). The
-glutamyl transpeptidase was measured with a Roche enzymatic colorimetric kit (catalog number 12016958; Roche Diagnostics GmbH) (interassay CV 1.4%; normal reference range <60 U/L).
Statistics
ABPM data were analyzed using repeated measures models allowing for the correlated error structure in the data (Proc Mixed; Statistical Analysis Program; SAS Institute). The remaining data were analyzed using SPSS 11 statistical software (SPSS) with GLM repeated measures for normally distributed data and was considered significant with Bonferroni P<0.05. Data not normally distributed were examined with Wilcoxon signed ranks test, with significance set at P<0.008 for paired comparisons to allow for 6 possible treatment comparisons. Data analyzed with SPSS were tested for period time and treatment order effect with univariate ANOVA. Baseline data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Nonbaseline values are reported as mean ± standard error except for log-transformed data, which are expressed as geometric mean (95% confidence interval) and non-normal data, which are expressed as median (interquartile range). Analysis was confined to participants who completed the study. The study was powered on the basis of being able to detect an absolute treatment difference in FMD of 2% or larger (80% power,
of 0.0083 to provide for 6 paired comparisons).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-glutamyl transpeptidase by 20% and 25%, respectively (P<0.05). There was a highly significant 6-fold increase in urinary 4OMGA excretion for red wine and de-alcoholized red wine, whereas beer doubled both 4OMGA and ferulic acid excretion.
|
|
The Figure shows the diurnal profiles for systolic BP, heart rate (HR), and beverage consumption on the day of ambulatory BP monitoring. These measures were performed on either the last or the second last day of each intervention. Most of the drinking occurred in the evening between 5:00 PM and 9:00 PM. Table 3 shows the results from 24-hour ABPM and HR monitoring. Compared with controlabstinence, both red wine and beer increased 24-hour systolic BP (2.2 and 1.7 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.05), with most of this effect seen while subjects were awake (Figure and Table 3). The systolic and diastolic BP and HR were not different between controlabstinence and de-alcoholized red wine interventions. Nor were there any differences in these 3 parameters between beer and red wine interventions. Compared with the controlabstinence intervention, both red wine and beer increased HR for 8 to 10 hours after drinking (Figure), increasing asleep HR by 5.0 and 4.4 bpm, respectively (P<0.05). There were no specific effects of red wine, de-alcoholized red wine, or beer on FMD and ET-1 (Table 4). However, post hoc comparison of the averaged results from the 2 alcohol periods (ie, beer and red wine) and nonalcohol periods (ie, abstinence and de-alcoholized red wine) found that alcohol increased urine ET-1 excretion [15.4 (12.9,18.5) versus 17.5 (14.4, 21.4) ng/d; P=0.014]. There was no alcohol effect on FMD (5.89±0.46% versus 5.13±1.13%; P=0.2).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
760 mg of polyphenols in de-alcoholized red wine for 4 weeks did not lower 24-hour BP. This study also demonstrated that regular daily consumption of 4 standard drinks of either beer or red wine for periods of 4 weeks does not alter endothelial function as assessed by FMD of the brachial artery. Nor was there any evidence to suggest any beneficial effect of de-alcoholized red wine to improve brachial artery response. The significant increases in the alcohol biomarker,
-glutamyl transpeptidase, during the alcohol periods, and a concomitant 6-fold increase in the red wine biomarker, 4OMGA, during the wine periods and a 2-fold increase in the beer biomarker, ferulic acid, during the beer period confirmed subject compliance with the protocol. The evidence generating the hypotheses that red wine may have less of a BP-raising effect than other alcoholic beverages comes from 4 cross-sectional epidemiological studies.1114 The results from those studies are limited, revealing only possible associations rather than specific evidence for causal relationships. The present study results serve to reject this hypothesis, with red wine (39 grams alcohol/d) increasing BP to similar levels to those seen when alcohol was consumed in the form of beer (41 grams alcohol/d). The magnitude of the change in BP from either beverage was commensurate with that predicted from a recent meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials of the effects of alcohol reduction on BP.33 A possible explanation for the different conclusion drawn from this study compared with epidemiological studies is that there may have been inadequate adjustment for confounding diet and lifestyle factors in the population-based studies. Specifically, the associations of a healthier diet17 and a higher socioeconomic status and hence a better access to health care34,35 among wine drinkers, and not the consumption of wine per se, may have been responsible for lower BP in the wine-drinking populations. The present study using ambulatory BP readings confirms that even in normotensive subjects, alcohol from beer and wine has a BP-raising effect, even though red wine is rich in vasodilator phenolic antioxidants. The observation of an increase in urinary ET-1 excretion during either red wine or beer ingestion raises the further possibility that the vasopressor effects of alcohol were caused, at least in part, via an alcohol-induced increase in ET-1, and do not support the contention from in vitro data that red wine will inhibit ET-1 synthesis.26
The current study supports previous findings of increases in HR with increases in alcohol intake.3639 In both hypertensive36,37 and normotensive39 men, the effect of alcohol to increase HR have been more pronounced during the evening and night. The dissociation between changes in BP and HR with systolic BP increasing during the day and HR increasing at night in our study support previous findings39 and are consistent with diurnal differences in the effects of alcohol on sympathovagal balance. We did not study ET-1 levels in relation to diurnal differences in BP and HR. Such studies could help clarify the relationship between ET-1 levels and sympathovagal balance.
To our knowledge, this is the first controlled short-term beverage intervention study that has studied the effect of beer, red wine, and de-alcoholized red wine on endothelial function as assessed by FMD of the brachial artery. However, there have been 2 uncontrolled studies that reported that short-term ingestion of purple grape juice (4 to 8 mL/kg per day for 2 to 4 weeks) improves endothelial function (FMD) in adults with coronary artery disease.6,7 Both these studies were interpreted as evidence for improved endothelium-dependent vasodilatation secondary to the antioxidant flavonoids found in grape juice. Unfortunately, however, these studies were neither randomized nor did they have a control beverage group with low flavonoid content for comparison. In addition, in both studies the grape juice was consumed on the morning of the assessment of endothelial function, thus making it difficult to ascertain whether the improvement was a result of "acute" or "short-term" intake. These shortcomings make it difficult to compare those published results with our finding that de-alcoholized red wine does not improve FMD. Because our study was well-controlled, the evidence for a lack of effect of red wine polyphenols to improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation secondary to antioxidant flavonoids carries greater weight than the grape juice trials. However, the "healthy drinker" status of our study subjects may have contributed to the lack of a detectable change in endothelial function after any, or all, treatment interventions (ie, red wine, beer, or de-alcoholized red wine).
Perspectives
The results of the present study suggest that in healthy normotensive men, daily consumption of
40 grams of alcohol as either red wine or beer for 4 weeks results in similar increases in both 24-hour systolic BP and HR, with the predominant BP-raising effect seen during the day and a predominant acceleration of HR occurring at night, immediately after ingestion of alcohol. It appears likely that the ability of alcohol beverages to raise BP is caused by the alcohol. The study did not detect any significant effect of beverage type on endothelial function and de-alcoholized red wine did not lower BP compared with abstinence, so it is unlikely that in predominantly normotensive men red wine polyphenolics have any significant role in lowering BP and do not mitigate against the BP-elevating effects of alcohol.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 19, 2004; first decision November 16, 2004; accepted March 23, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. D. Sesso, N. R. Cook, J. E. Buring, J. E. Manson, and J. M. Gaziano Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Hypertension in Women and Men Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 1080 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Spaak, A. C. Merlocco, G. J. Soleas, G. Tomlinson, B. L. Morris, P. Picton, C. F. Notarius, C. T. Chan, and J. S. Floras Dose-related effects of red wine and alcohol on hemodynamics, sympathetic nerve activity, and arterial diameter Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H605 - H612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Opie and S. Lecour The red wine hypothesis: from concepts to protective signalling molecules Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2007; 28(14): 1683 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Beilin and I. B. Puddey Alcohol and Hypertension: An Update Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1035 - 1038. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L Eigenbrodt, F. D Fuchs, D. J Couper, D. C Goff Jr, C. P. Sanford, R. G Hutchinson, and Z. Bursac Changing drinking pattern does not influence health perception: a longitudinal study of the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2006; 60(4): 345 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
From the Library Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2005; 89(8): 1072 - 1072. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, July 9, 2005; 331(7508): E369 - E369. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, May 14, 2005; 330(7500): 1158 - 1158. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Fuchs Vascular Effects of Alcoholic Beverages: Is It Only Alcohol That Matters? Hypertension, May 1, 2005; 45(5): 851 - 852. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |