Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2005;45:991-996
Published online before print March 21, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000161184.10873.ea
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/5/991    most recent
01.HYP.0000161184.10873.eav1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viazzi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Pontremoli, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viazzi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Pontremoli, R.

(Hypertension. 2005;45:991.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Serum Uric Acid and Target Organ Damage in Primary Hypertension

Francesca Viazzi; Denise Parodi; Giovanna Leoncini; Angelica Parodi; Valeria Falqui; Elena Ratto; Simone Vettoretti; Gian Paolo Bezante; Massimo Del Sette; Giacomo Deferrari; Roberto Pontremoli

From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa and the Department of Cardionephrology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Martino, Italy.

Correspondence to Roberto Pontremoli, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa and Department of Cardionephrology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Martino, Viale Benedetto XV, 6-16132 Genoa, Italy. E-mail roberto.pontremoli{at}unige.it


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowPatients and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The role of serum uric acid as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and renal morbidity is controversial. A better understanding of its relationship with preclinical organ damage may help clarify the mechanism(s) implicated in the development of early cardiovascular disease. We evaluated the association between uric acid and the presence and degree of target organ damage in 425 (265 males, 160 females) middle-aged, untreated patients with essential hypertension. Left ventricular mass index and carotid intima-media thickness were assessed by ultrasound scan. Albuminuria was measured as the albumin to creatinine ratio in 3 nonconsecutive first morning urine samples. Overall, patients with target organ damage had significantly higher levels of serum uric acid as compared with those without it (presence versus absence of left ventricular hypertrophy, P=0.04; carotid abnormalities, P<0.05; microalbuminuria, P<0.004; and at least 1 versus no organ damage, P<0.03). In women, the occurrence and severity of each target organ damage we examined increased progressively from the lower to the upper serum uric acid tertiles (P<0.01). After adjustment for body mass index, age, creatinine clearance, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, each standard deviation increase in serum uric acid entailed a 75% higher risk of having cardiac hypertrophy and a 2-times greater risk of having carotid abnormalities. These results support the role of serum uric acid as an independent, modifiable marker of cardiovascular damage.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • gender • hypertension • risk factors • uric acid


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowPatients and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A number of studies have shown that serum uric acid (SUA) plays a role in the development of cardiovascular morbidity in the general population,1–4 as well as in patients with hypertension,5–7 type II diabetes,8 and cardiac or vascular diseases.9–12 A meta-analysis of data taken from 8 trials that were performed on hypertensive patients showed that each standard deviation (SD) increment in SUA entails an augmentation of cardiovascular risk that equals what is observed for similar changes in blood pressure or total cholesterol.13 However, the independent role of SUA as a risk factor has been undergoing debate for years. In fact, mild hyperuricemia is often a concomitant finding of obesity, lipid abnormalities, and insulin resistance, all of which are components of the metabolic syndrome (MS). Accordingly, in some studies on white as well as Asian populations, the direct relationship that is observed between uric acid and cardiovascular mortality weakens or disappears after adjusting for confounding factors.14–16

Several pathophysiological mechanisms linking SUA to cardiovascular damage at the cellular and tissue level have been proposed, including proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells,17 stimulation of the inflammatory pathway,18 and possible prothrombotic effects mediated by platelet activation.19 In addition, uric acid has proved to be an excellent marker for tissue ischemia and endothelial dysfunction,11,20 and it has been shown to play a role in the development of atherosclerotic lesions.21

The presence of subclinical hypertensive organ damage signals a condition of increased risk for cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. Thus, the search for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), carotid atherosclerosis, and microalbuminuria, which likely reflect both the severity of blood pressure load and other nonhemodynamic risk factors, is currently recommended as part of global risk assessment.22 Because the role of SUA in the development of cardiovascular disease is receiving growing attention, a better understanding of its relationship with subclinical hypertensive target organ damage (TOD) may help clarify the pathophysiological mechanism(s) underlying this association. The present study was therefore performed to evaluate the association between SUA levels and the presence and degree of preclinical organ damage in a group of middle-aged, untreated patients with essential hypertension.


*    Patients and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Patients and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Between January 1998 and July 2002, all patients with primary hypertension attending the outpatient clinic of our institution were asked to participate in this study, which was part of a larger trial (MAGIC: Microalbuminuria: A Genoa Investigation on Complications) approved by the Ethical Committee of our department. Details of the study have already been published.23 Altogether, 511 hypertensive patients were seen at our clinic within the aforementioned time range, and among them 445 met study criteria and accepted to participate; 356 patients (80%) had never been treated for hypertension, whereas 89 (20%) had received some form of therapy, albeit discontinuously, in the past. However, none had taken antihypertensive drugs over the 6 months before the study. Seven patients (2%) had received or were currently receiving allopurinol treatment and were therefore excluded from this analysis. Thirteen patients declined, and 425 form the basis of the present report. After written informed consent had been obtained, all patients underwent the following procedures, usually within 2 weeks of enrolment in the study: (1) office blood pressure measurement; (2) blood and urine sampling; (3) standard 12-lead ECG; (4) echocardiogram; and (5) carotid ultrasonography. Blood pressure was measured as described.23 MS was defined according to Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) criteria.24 Creatinine clearance was estimated by the Cockcroft–Gault formula25 and ideal body weight was used in the formula. TOD, namely left ventricular hypertrophy, carotid abnormalities, and microalbuminuria, was evaluated in all patients (n=425) as described in agreement with European Society of Hypertension–European Society of Cardiology guidelines.22,26 Furthermore, in a subgroup of 200 patients (124 men, 76 women), data on renal resistive index were evaluated as described.27 Please see http://hyper.ahajournals.org for further details.

Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SD. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni or Turkey multiple comparison post-test (as appropriate) was used to analyze data from patients with different levels of serum uric acid, and with or without TOD. Relations among variables were assessed using linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient. Comparisons of proportion among groups were performed using the {chi}2 test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the independent contribution of several variables, including SUA, to the presence of TOD. All statistical analyses were performed using Statview for Windows (SAS Institute Inc, version 5.0.1, Cary, NC). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPatients and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The main clinical characteristics of our study patients (age range, 20 to 67 years), analyzed on the basis of gender and SUA levels (tertiles), are reported in Table 1. The overall prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, carotid abnormalities, and microalbuminuria was 46%, 31%, and 12%, respectively. The prevalence of carotid plaque was 23%. As expected, men showed significantly higher SUA levels as compared with women (348±72 versus 246±60 µmol/L; P<0.0001). Furthermore, there was a trend toward higher body mass index (BMI), triglycerides, and prevalence of MS with growing tertiles of SUA in men. Women in the upper (SUA) tertile were older and showed higher BMI and lower creatinine clearance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Descriptive Characteristics of Study Patients on the Basis of Serum Uric Acid Levels and Gender

Univariate analysis showed that among the whole group, SUA was directly related to BMI, creatinine, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the components of MS, whereas it was inversely related to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. These associations were also present in men, whereas in women only a positive correlation with age and BMI and a negative correlation with estimated creatinine clearance were observed. SUA was unrelated to blood pressure components, alcohol consumption, and urinary sodium excretion. There was a significant linear trend for the relation between SUA levels and TOD in the whole group, because SUA was directly related to left ventricular mass index and the severity of TOD. Taking each gender into consideration separately, the correlation was stronger in women: the higher the level of SUA, the higher the left ventricular mass index and the number of TOD that occurred. In contrast, the association between SUA and TOD was not confirmed in men (Table 2). Overall, patients with TOD had significantly higher levels of SUA as compared with those without it (Figure 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Univariate Correlation Between Serum Uric Acid and Selected Clinical Variables



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Serum uric acid and target organ damage in patients with essential hypertension (n=425). SUA levels are analyzed on the basis of the presence/absence of different signs of TOD (1a) and on the basis of the severity of TOD involvement (1b). SUA indicates serum uric acid; LVH(echo), left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography; Carotid ATS, carotid atherosclerosis by US carotid scan; TOD 0, patients without signs of organ damage; TOD+, subgroup of patients with either LVH or carotid abnormalities or microalbuminuria; TOD++, patients with a combination of any two signs of TOD; TOD+++, those with all three signs of the TOD we examined. *P<0.05 and {dagger}P<0.01 vs patients without damage; {ddagger} P<0.01 refers to inter-group comparison.

There was no difference in the prevalence and severity of TOD among the tertiles of SUA in men (data not shown). Conversely, in women the occurrence of each TOD we examined increased progressively from the lower to the upper tertiles (Table 3). Furthermore, females in the top tertile of SUA showed higher urinary albumin excretion and thicker carotid walls (F=4.3, P=0.015 intergroup comparison) (Table 3). Finally, the severity of TOD, ie, the number of organs involved, also increased from lower to upper SUA tertile in women. In fact, female patients in the highest tertile were almost 6-times more likely to show at least 2 signs of TOD as compared with those in the lowest tertile (Figure 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Prevalence and Severity of Target Organ Damage in Hypertensive Women on the Basis of SUA Levels



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Prevalence of increasing organ involvement in hypertensive women on the basis of SUA tertiles. SUA indicates serum uric acid; 1 affected organ indicates the subgroup of patients with either LVH or carotid abnormalities or microalbuminuria; 2 or 3 affected organs indicates patients with a combination of any two or three signs of target organ damage we examined ({chi}2 11.95 P<0.018). The odds ratio of women in the third tertile having at least 2 signs of TOD is 5.5 (CI 1.2–7.3; P<0.03).

The independent relationship of SUA to the presence and severity of early organ damage was confirmed by the results of multiple logistic regression analysis (Table 4DownDown). In fact, even after adjustment for several known risk factors, such as BMI, age, creatinine clearance, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, each 60-µmol/L increase in SUA (ie, 1 SD) entailed a 75% higher risk of having LVH and a 2-times greater risk of having carotid abnormalities. The occurrence of any one sign of TOD also increases in parallel with the elevation of SUA (Table 4 DownDown). Preliminary data on ultrasound Doppler intrarenal resistive index (gathered on a subgroup of 200 patients) indicate a correlation between renovascular impedance and SUA in women (n=76; r=0.26; P<0.007).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis* 4A. Dependent Variable: LVH (echo)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
4B. Dependent Variable: Carotid Abnormalities


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
4C. Dependent Variable: At Least 1 TOD


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPatients and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study demonstrates that SUA levels are associated with preclinical TOD, namely LVH, carotid atherosclerosis, and microalbuminuria, in a large group of untreated patients with primary hypertension, regardless of other known cardiovascular risk factors.

Although several longitudinal studies have previously shown an independent prognostic role of SUA in hypertensive patients,5,6,13,15 to date, cross-sectional reports on the association between mild hyperuricemia and TOD11,26,27 have been scanty. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to systematically investigate the relationship between SUA and cardiovascular and renal abnormalities, ie, LVH, carotid atherosclerosis, and microalbuminuria in patients with primary hypertension. Our findings suggest that uric acid may be implicated in the early pathogenetic stages of cardiovascular damage. They also provide a pathophysiological rationale to at least partly account for the association of uric acid to cardiovascular events and mortality in hypertensive patients. In fact, subclinical TOD represents an intermediate step between exposure to risk factors and occurrence of overt cardiovascular disease and has previously been shown to be a strong predictor of major events. Our study population is especially well-suited for a similar observation because most patients had never been treated, and only a minority (20%) had received some form of therapy, albeit discontinuously, in the past. Furthermore, great care was taken to exclude patients who were taking drugs that interfere with uric acid levels and/or those with a history of gout or renal stones.

The strong correlation we observed between SUA and TOD in women (Table 3), confirms previous studies9,28–30 that showed a more robust association (of uric acid) with electrocardiographic abnormalities31 and coronary atherosclerosis28 in this gender. These findings may in turn account for the previously reported stronger predictive power of uric acid in women, with or without hypertension, as compared with men. In the present study, TOD involvement increased along with SUA tertiles in females (Figure 2) and was independent of several confounders such as age, serum lipid profile, blood pressure, and creatinine clearance (Table 4 UpUp). Thus, it could be speculated that the role of SUA as a marker of risk becomes more evident in the context of a lower risk profile (ie, in women). A similar interpretation has been put forward to justify results from the Syst-China study,16 which found that cardiovascular and stroke mortality increased in parallel with higher levels of SUA in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension but who were otherwise at relatively low risk. Furthermore, interaction between sex hormones and pathophysiological mechanisms linking SUA to cardiovascular damage cannot be ruled out. In fact, it has been proposed that the higher SUA levels observed in men as compared with women may be caused by increased renal clearance of urate related to estrogen in premenopausal women.

The association between SUA and early hypertensive and atherosclerotic organ damage is intriguing and suggests that mild hyperuricemia might be a marker of incipient cardiovascular involvement. In the context of primary hypertension, mild hyperuricemia is often a feature of insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome. As a matter of fact, we observed that higher SUA values in men were associated to an increasing number of MS components (Table 2), and more frequently to MS itself ({chi}2=7.4, P=0.006; Table 1). After adjusting for selected well-known risk factors (namely blood pressure, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and number of MS components), we found a statistically relevant relationship between uric acid and the severity of organ damage (ANCOVA F4.1; P<0.019 data not shown). This is partly at variance with data previously reported in the ARIC study,32 performed on a large group of patients who were free of overt cardiovascular disease, in which the role of SUA as a risk factor for carotid abnormalities was substantially weakened after adjustment for variables linked to MS and atherosclerosis. In women, however, we found that the relationship between uric acid and TOD was independent of the MS, because its components were equally distributed among tertiles of SUA (data not shown).

Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for the association between SUA and cardiovascular and renal abnormalities, and include: (1) increased uric acid production to counteract oxidative stress and endothelial damage in the context of the atherosclerotic process;33 (2) the severity of hypertension itself;34,35 and (3) a subtle reduction in glomerular filtration rate leading to impaired renal uric acid clearance.36 However, among our patients, we found no differences in blood pressure on the basis of SUA tertiles (Table 3), and no relationship was present between uric acid levels and any blood pressure components (data not shown). Furthermore, although the correlation we observed between uric acid and TOD was at least partly independent of the glomerular filtration rate (Table 4UpUp), women included in the upper SUA tertile also showed lower calculated glomerular filtration rate (Table 1). Johnson et al previously proposed that even mild hyperuricemia might exert nephrotoxic effects by inducing vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation at the preglomerular level.37–39 This could lead to ischemia, especially in the context of long-standing hypertension. Interestingly, among our female study patients whose renal resistive index was evaluated by ultrasound Doppler, we observed an association between increased renovascular impedance and uric acid (P<0.007). This may indicate the presence of hemodynamic abnormalities in hypertensive patients with mild hyperuricemia. Although the cross-sectional design of our study does not allow us to draw conclusions regarding the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying these associations, these findings further support the role of SUA as a marker of renal damage.

Perspectives
The issue of mild hyperuricemia and cardiovascular disease has been getting more and more attention since antihypertensive agents were shown to possibly induce subtle but significant changes in uric acid, which could impact on their ability to provide cardiovascular and renal protection.7,9,40 However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the more favorable outcome that is observed as SUA changes over time might merely be a reflection of other factors, such as improved insulin resistance41 or a slight amelioration in renal function.42 In conclusion, our study shows that increased SUA is a marker of subclinical TOD in a population of untreated patients with primary hypertension. These results support a role for SUA as an independent, modifiable marker of TOD. Further studies are needed to ascertain whether SUA reduction per se confers cardiovascular protection, and the possible role it may play as a surrogate end point of antihypertensive treatment.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The excellent technical assistance of Cinzia Tomolillo, BS is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank L. E. Derchi and C. Martinoli for performing ultrasound Doppler renal investigation on our study patients. This work was partly supported by grants from Ministero Università e Ricerca Scientifica (FIRB2001) and from the Italian Ministero della Salute (ex art.12 D.Lgs 502/92-Esercizio 2003).

Received January 20, 2005; first decision February 6, 2005; accepted February 21, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPatients and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Fang J, Alderman MH. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971–1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2000; 283: 2404–2410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Puddu PE, Lanti M, Menotti A, Mancini M, Zanchetti A, Cirillo M, Angeletti M, Panarelli W; Gubbio Study Research Group. Serum uric acid for short-term prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence in the Gubbio population Study. Acta Cardiol. 2001; 56: 243–251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Liese AD, Hense HW, Lowel H, Doring A, Tietze M, Keil U. Association of serum uric acid with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality and incident myocardial infarction in the MONICA Augsburg cohort. World Health Organization Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Diseases. Epidemiology. 1999; 10: 391–397.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Niskanen LK, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssonen K, Alfthan G, Lakka HM, Lakka TA, Salonen JT. Uric acid level as a risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in middle-aged men: a prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164: 1546–1551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Alderman MH, Cohen H, Madhavan S, Kivlighn S. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular events in successfully treated hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 144–150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Reboldi G, Santeusanio F, Porcellati C, Brunetti. Relation between serum uric acid and risk of cardiovascular disease in essential hypertension. The PIUMA study. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 1072–1078.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Franse LV, Pahor M, Di Bari M, Shorr RI, Wan JY, Somes GW, Applegate WB. Serum uric acid, diuretic treatment and risk of cardiovascular events in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 1149–1154.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Lehto S, Niskanen L, Ronnemaa T, Laakso M. Serum uric acid is a strong predictor of stroke in patients with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Stroke. 1998; 29: 635–639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Hoieggen A, Alderman MH, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Devereux RB, De Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Ibsen H, Kristianson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Lindholm luteinizing hormone (LH), Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H, Chen C, Dahlof B; LIFE Study Group. The impact of serum uric acid on cardiovascular outcomes in the LIFE study. Kidney Int. 2004; 65: 1041–1049.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Bickel C, Rupprecht HJ, Blankenberg S, Rippin G, Hafner G, Daunhauer A, Hofmann KP, Meyer J. Serum uric acid as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 12–17.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Langlois M, De Bacquer D, Duprez D, De Buyzere M, Delanghe J, Blaton V. Serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with and without peripheral arterial disease. Atherosclerosis. 2003; 168: 163–168.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Weir CJ, Muir SW, Walters MR, Lees KR. Serum urate as an independent predictor of poor outcome and future vascular events after acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1951–1956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Gueyffier F, Boissel JP, Pocock S, Boutitie F, Coope J, Cutler J, Ekbom T, Fagard R, Friedman L, Kerlikowske K, Perry M, Prineas R, Schron E. Identification of risk factors in hypertensive patients: contribution of randomized controlled trials through an individual patient database. Circulation. 1999; 100: e88–e94.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Culleton BF, Larson MG, Kannel WB, Levy D. Serum uric acid and risk for cardiovascular disease and death: the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131: 7–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Sakata K, Hashimoto T, Ueshima H, Okayama A; NIPPON DATA 80 Research Group. Absence of an association between serum uric acid and mortality from cardiovascular disease: NIPPON DATA 80, 1980–1994. National Integrated Projects for Prospective Observation of Non-communicable Diseases and its Trend in the Aged. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001; 17: 461–468.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Wang JG, Staessen JA, Fagard RH, Birkenhager WH, Gong L, Liu L. Prognostic significance of serum creatinine and uric acid in older Chinese patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1069–1074.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Mazzali M, Kanellis J, Han L, Feng L, Xia YY, Chen Q, Kang DH, Gordon KL, Watanabe S, Nakagawa T, Lan HY, Johnson RJ. Hyperuricemia induces a primary renal arteriolopathy in rats by a blood pressure-independent mechanism. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002; 282: F991–F997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Kanellis J, Watanabe S, Li JH, Kang DH, Li P, Nakagawa T, Wamsley A, Sheikh-Hamad D, Lan HY, Feng L, Johnson RJ. Uric acid stimulates monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production in vascular smooth muscle cells via mitogen-activated protein kinase and cyclooxygenase-2. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 1287–1293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Rao GN, Corson MA, Berk BC. Uric acid stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by increasing platelet-derived growth factor A-chain expression. J Biol Chem. 1991; 266: 8604–8608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Kang DH, Finch J, Nakagawa T, Karumanchi SA, Kanellis J, Granger J, Johnson RJ. Uric acid, endothelial dysfunction and pre-eclampsia: searching for a pathogenetic link. J Hypertens. 2004; 22: 229–235.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Patetsios P, Song M, Shutze WP, Pappas C, Rodino W, Ramirez JA, Panetta TF. Identification of uric acid and xanthine oxidase in atherosclerotic plaque. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 188–191, A6.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension - European Society of Cardiology guidelines for management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003; 21: 1011–1053.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Pontremoli R, Sofia A, Ravera M, Nicolella C, Viazzi F, Tirotta A. Prevalence and clinical correlates of microalbuminuria in essential hypertension: the MAGIC study. Hypertension. 1997; 30: 1135–1143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285: 2486–2497.[Free Full Text]

25. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976; 16: 31–41.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Tuttle KR, Short RA, Johnson RJ. Sex differences in uric acid and risk factors for coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 1411–1414.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Campo C, Ruilope LM, Segura J, Rodicio JL, Garcia-Robles R, Garcia-Puig J. Hyperuricemia, low urine urate excretion and target organ damage in arterial hypertension. Blood Press. 2003; 12: 277–283.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Brand FN, McGee DL, Kannel WB, Stokes J 3rd, Castelli WP. Hyperuricemia as a risk factor of coronary heart disease: The Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121: 11–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Levine W, Dyer AR, Shekelle RB, Schoenberger JA, Stamler J. Serum uric acid and 11.5-year mortality of middle-aged women: findings of the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989; 42: 257–267.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Gunter EW, Byers T. Relation of serum uric acid to mortality and ischemic heart disease. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 141: 637–644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Persky VW, Dyer AR, Idris-Soven E, Stamler J, Shekelle RB, Schoenberger JA, Berkson DM, Lindberg HA. Uric acid: a risk factor for coronary heart disease? Circulation. 1979; 59: 969–977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Iribarren C, Folsom AR, Eckfeldt JH, McGovern prostaglandin (PG), Nieto FJ. Correlates of uric acid and its association with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis: the ARIC Study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities. Ann Epidemiol. 1996; 6: 331–340.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Nieto FJ, Iribarren C, Gross MD, Comstock GW, Cutler RG. Uric acid and serum antioxidant capacity: a reaction to atherosclerosis? Atherosclerosis. 2000; 148: 131–139.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Masuo K, Kawaguchi H, Mikami H, Ogihara T, Tuck ML. Serum uric acid and plasma norepinephrine concentrations predict subsequent weight gain and blood pressure elevation. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 474–480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Nakanishi N, Okamoto M, Yoshida H, Matsuo Y, Suzuki K, Tatara K. Serum uric acid and risk for development of hypertension and impaired fasting glucose or Type II diabetes in Japanese male office workers. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003; 18: 523–530.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Ruilope LM, Garcia-Puig J. Hyperuricemia and renal function. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2001; 3: 197–202.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Johnson RJ, Kang DH, Feig D, Kivlighn S, Kanellis J, Watanabe S, Tuttle KR, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Herrera-Acosta J, Mazzali M. Is there a pathogenetic role for uric acid in hypertension and cardiovascular and renal disease? Hypertension. 2003; 41: 1183–1190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Kang DH, Nakagawa T, Feng L, Watanabe S, Han L, Mazzali M, Truong L, Harris R, Johnson RJ. n A role for uric acid in the progression of renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002; 13: 2888–2897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Sanchez-Lozada LG, Tapia E, Avila-Casado C, Soto V, Franco M, Santamaria J, Nakagawa T, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Johnson RJ, Herrera-Acosta J. Mild hyperuricemia induces glomerular hypertension in normal rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002; 283: F1105–F1110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Alderman M, Aiyer KJ. Uric acid: role in cardiovascular disease and effects of losartan. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004; 20: 369–379.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Tsunoda S, Kamide K, Minami J, Kawano Y. Decreases in serum uric acid by amelioration of insulin resistance in overweight hypertensive patients: effect of a low-energy diet and an insulin-sensitizing agent. Am J Hypertens. 2002; 15: 697–701.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Athyros VG, Elisaf M, Papageorgiou AA, Symeonidis AN, Pehlivanidis AN, Bouloukos VI, Milionis HJ, Mikhailidis DP; GREACE Study Collaborative Group. Effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidemia on serum uric acid levels in patients with coronary heart disease: a subgroup analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 43: 589–599.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. H. Alderman
Podagra, Uric Acid, and Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): 880 - 883.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Erdogan, I. Yildirim, O. Ciftci, I. Ozer, M. Caliskan, H. Gullu, and H. Muderrisoglu
Effects of Normal Blood Pressure, Prehypertension, and Hypertension on Coronary Microvascular Function
Circulation, February 6, 2007; 115(5): 593 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. W. Sanders
Uric Acid: An Old Dog with New Tricks?
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1767 - 1768.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
I. H. Schulman, P. Aranda, L. Raij, M. Veronesi, F. J. Aranda, and R. Martin
Surgical Menopause Increases Salt Sensitivity of Blood Pressure
Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1168 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Ruggiero, A. Cherubini, A. Ble, A. J.G. Bos, M. Maggio, V. D. Dixit, F. Lauretani, S. Bandinelli, U. Senin, and L. Ferrucci
Uric acid and inflammatory markers
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2006; 27(10): 1174 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. Zoccali, R. Maio, F. Mallamaci, G. Sesti, and F. Perticone
Uric Acid and Endothelial Dysfunction in Essential Hypertension
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2006; 17(5): 1466 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. E. Lee, Y.-G. Kim, Y.-H. Choi, W. Huh, D. J. Kim, and H. Y. Oh
Serum Uric Acid Is Associated With Microalbuminuria in Prehypertension
Hypertension, May 1, 2006; 47(5): 962 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Iwashima, T. Horio, K. Kamide, H. Rakugi, T. Ogihara, and Y. Kawano
Uric Acid, Left Ventricular Mass Index, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Essential Hypertension
Hypertension, February 1, 2006; 47(2): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/5/991    most recent
01.HYP.0000161184.10873.eav1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viazzi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Pontremoli, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viazzi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Pontremoli, R.