| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2005;46:308.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the St. Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK.
Correspondence to Pauline A. Swift, Blood Pressure Unit, St. Georges Hospital Medical School, London, SW17 0RE, UK. E-mail p.swift{at}sghms.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 to 5 g salt per day). Blood pressure fell from 159/101±13/8 to 151/98±13/8 mm Hg (P<0.01). Protein excretion fell from 93±48 mg to 75±30 mg per 24 hours (P<0.008). Thus, reducing salt intake from
10 to 5 g per day reduced blood pressure and urine protein excretion in black hypertensives. In light of these findings, we would recommend that all black individuals with raised blood pressure reduce their salt intake to
5 g per day.
Key Words: blacks sodium, dietary blood pressure proteinuria
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Raised blood pressure is the major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, whereas blood pressure reduction reduces mortality from stroke, coronary heart disease, and heart failure.6,7 More recently, proteinuria and albuminuria have been implicated as independent risk factors for cardiovascular mortality in hypertensives, diabetics, and the elderly.811
In renal disease, high blood pressure and urine protein excretion are major, modifiable risk factors for disease progression.12,13 Outcome trials demonstrate the benefits of reducing blood pressure and urine protein excretion in diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies.1417
Salt intake is a major cause of raised blood pressure and a risk factor for renal damage. In clinical and experimental studies, high salt intake is associated independently with hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, albuminuria, renal hypertrophy, and fibrosis.1820 In addition, observational studies demonstrate a positive relationship between salt intake, urine protein excretion, and progression of renal disease.21
Salt reduction reduces blood pressure.22,23 From the few studies that have included black individuals, there is some evidence that black individuals have a greater blood pressure response to salt reduction than their white counterparts.2325 The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)sodium study (randomized but not double blind) of 3 salt intakes (8, 6, and 4 g per day) showed that the fall in blood pressure tended to be greatest in the black group.26
There are no double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of salt reduction on blood pressure in black individuals; neither are there controlled studies of salt reduction on urine protein excretion. Therefore, the aim of our study was to carry out the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of salt reduction (to the current World Health Organization [WHO]recommended level of 5 g per day27) in black hypertensives. The primary aim was to determine the effect of salt reduction on blood pressure, and the secondary aim was to determine the effect on urine protein excretion.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
140 or diastolic blood pressure
90 mm Hg) of African or AfricanCaribbean origin were invited to participate in the study. Participants had not been treated with pharmacological antihypertensive agents in the preceding 4 weeks or diuretics in the preceding 8 weeks. Exclusion criteria included severe hypertension (systolic BP
200 mm Hg or diastolic BP
110 mm Hg), evidence of secondary hypertension, previous stroke, ischemic heart disease, cardiac failure, diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, liver disease, significant renal insufficiency (creatinine >160 mmol/L1), or overt proteinuria (>300 mg of urinary protein per 24 hours). The local research ethics committee (LREC) approved the study, and all procedures followed were in accordance with LREC guidelines. Participants gave written informed consent before taking part in the study.
Study Design and Measurements
Study participants were asked to continue on their usual diet for a run-in period of 4 weeks. Thereafter, participants were given written and verbal advice by specialist nurses on how to reduce salt, with a view to achieving an intake of
5 g daily. After an additional 2-week run-in period on reduced salt, individuals were then entered into a randomized, double-blind crossover study of slow sodium versus placebo tablets. They took 12 slow sodium tablets (10 mmol sodium per tablet) daily or 12 matched placebo tablets for 4 weeks each.
BP and other measurements were made at the end of each run-in period and at the end of each 4-week period on slow sodium or placebo. BP was measured by trained specialist nurses using an appropriate cuff size, with the arm at heart level, in the semisupine position, using a semiautomated device (OMRON HEM-705CP). The mean of the last 3 readings was recorded for analysis. Twenty-fourhour ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring was performed using SpaceLab 90207 devices. They were fitted in the mornings, and BP recordings were taken at half-hourly intervals during the day (from 9 AM to 10 PM) and at hourly intervals overnight (from 10 PM to 9 AM). Twenty-fourhour recordings were analyzed with the ABP report manager system (version 1.03.11) software package.
Laboratory Procedures and Statistical Methods
All blood samples were either analyzed immediately for routine assays or were spun and the plasma frozen and stored at 20°C until the time of assay. Plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone, and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) were measured by radioimmunoassay.2830 Urine samples were also stored at 20°C until the time of assay. Total urinary protein was measured using a dye binding method as described previously.31
Group data for normally distributed variables are expressed as mean±SD, and we used the paired Student t test to compare differences between the slow sodium and placebo phases. Where variables were not normally distributed (eg, PRA, aldosterone, and ANP), the results are shown as the median and interquartile range, and the Wilcoxon sign ranks test was used. Correlation analysis was used for studying linear relationships between changes in variables with salt reduction. A (2-tailed) P value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS 10.0 for Windows software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effects of Salt Reduction on BP
The effects of slow sodium and placebo on urinary sodium excretion and BP are summarized in Table 2. The urinary sodium excretion on sodium tablets was 167±73 mmol per 24 hours, which is equivalent to a dietary salt intake of
10 g salt per day. The urinary sodium excretion on placebo tablets fell to 89±52 mmol per 24 hours,
5 g salt per day. Therefore, the mean fall in urinary sodium excretion was 78±62 mmol per 24 hours, equivalent to
5 g salt per day (P<0.001; Figure).
|
|
With this reduction in salt intake, BP fell from 159/101±13/8 to 151/98±13/8 mm Hg (ie, a fall in systolic pressure of 8±13 mm Hg [P<0.001] and diastolic pressure of 3±7 mm Hg [P<0.009]; Figure). In addition, there were significant falls in mean daytime and nighttime ABPs, with the reduction in salt intake (mean 24-hour reduction of 7/3 mm Hg).
Effects of Salt on Urine Protein Excretion
Urine protein excretion fell from 93±48 mg per 24 hours on slow sodium to 75±30 mg per 24 hours on placebo. Thus, the mean fall in urine protein excretion was 18±39 mg per 24 hours (P=0.008) with salt reduction (Figure). In addition, the mean urine protein to creatinine ratio fell significantly, from 6.6±3.2 to 5.7±2.2 mg per mmol (P=0.03).
Relationships Between Urine Protein Excretion, BP, and Urine Sodium Excretion
There was no significant relationship between the change in urine protein excretion and the change in systolic BP (r=0.07; P=0.70) or change in diastolic BP (r=0.19; P=0.26) with salt reduction. However, there was a highly significant correlation between the change in urinary protein excretion and the change in urine sodium excretion (r=0.53; P=0.001). This remained significant even when corrected for the fall in systolic and diastolic BP (r=0.50; P=0.002) and when corrected for BP as well as urinary potassium, urea, and creatinine (r=0.42; P=0.016).
Effects of Salt on the Renin-Angiotensin System
There was a small but statistically significant increase in PRA, from 0.1 (0.1 to 0.3) ng/mL to 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) ng/mL (P=0.013) with salt reduction. There was also a small, nonsignificant elevation in plasma aldosterone concentration.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 to 5 g per day. This fall in BP was sustained over a 24-hour period, with significant falls in ABP measured in the day and at night. The achieved reduction in salt intake is from one that is similar to the current salt intake in most Western countries (10 to 12 g per day) to the WHO-recommended intake of
5 g per day.32,27 With this reduction in salt intake, there was also a large and significant reduction in urine protein excretion of 19.4%.
Most previous studies of salt reduction in black individuals have been acute studies (ie, for
1 week) with large reductions in salt intake.25,33,34 They have suggested that black hypertensives respond slightly better to salt reduction than white hypertensives as a result of their suppressed renin-angiotensin system.25 The only other controlled but not double-blind trial of modest, longer-term reduction in salt intake is the DASH-sodium study.24 It showed significant and dose-related falls in BP when salt intake was reduced from 8 to 6 and 4 g per day over a period of 1 month each. The fall in BP seen in the black group was slightly greater than in similar nonblack groups.26 However, in the DASH-sodium study, all participants were given all food and drink, and how well individuals could stick to this diet on their own is not clear.
The fall in BP that we have seen in the current double-blind study is equivalent to the fall seen with single drug therapy and also to that seen in previous double-blind studies in which we have shown that salt restriction is markedly additive to drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system.3537
There are no previous studies of the effect of salt reduction on urine protein excretion. Therefore, our findings are of considerable interest. Black hypertensives are more likely to develop hypertensive renal failure as well as being at greater risk from the direct cardiovascular effects of BP (ie, stroke, left ventricular hypertrophy, and cardiac failure).15 Proteinuria is known to be a major risk factor for the development and progression of renal disease as well as cardiovascular disease.813 This risk increases throughout the range of urine protein or albumin excretion and also applies to values within the normal range.38,39 The finding that salt reduction reduces urine protein excretion suggests that this will carry additional benefits on renal and cardiovascular risk in addition to that which would be obtained by BP reduction alone.
The reduction in urine protein excretion was related significantly to the fall in urine sodium excretion but not to the fall in BP. Observational studies, including the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK), showed a positive and significant correlation between 24-hour urinary sodium excretion and urine protein excretion in those who were screened for entry to the trial.40 Recent studies in white hypertensives have also demonstrated positive correlations between 24-hour urinary sodium excretion and target organ damage including microalbuminuria.19 These observational studies support the view that salt intake is a major risk factor for increased urine protein excretion, whereas our study shows that this risk can be reduced by a modest reduction in salt intake. However, not all BP-lowering therapies consistently reduce urine protein or albumin excretion. In the AASK study, treatment with amlodipine was associated with a significant increase in urine protein excretion from baseline, despite effective BP control, whereas ramipril and metoprolol reduced urine protein excretion.17
Some studies have suggested that there might be preferential effects of using drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system to lower proteinuria.15,16 It is of interest that in this study of salt restriction, the reduction in urine protein excretion occurred in the presence of a small but significant increase in the activity of the renin-angiotensin system. A previous short-term study showed that the antiproteinuric effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor could be abolished by increasing salt intake.41 It is likely then that there would be additive or even synergistic effects on urine protein excretion when the renin-angiotensin system is blocked at the same time as reducing salt intake.
Conclusion
A modest reduction in salt intake from 10 to 5 g per day reduced BP and urine protein excretion in nondiabetic black hypertensives.
Perspectives
Salt intake is a major cause of raised BP and risk factor for renal damage. WHO recommends that salt intake does not exceed 5 g per day.31 In this study, we demonstrated that a reduction in salt intake to this level is associated with significant reduction in BP and urine protein excretion. In view of the continuous relationship between salt intake, BP, level of urine protein excretion, and renal and cardiovascular risk, our results demonstrate the potential long-term benefits of salt reduction on the progression of renal and cardiovascular disease in black individuals. We would speculate that these beneficial effects would also be seen in nonblack individuals. In addition, it is likely that the effects of salt reduction will be additive to the effects of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system on BP and urine protein excretion. Our results illustrate the importance of giving simple clear advice to all black hypertensives on how to cut their salt intake from the current 10 to 12 g per day to <5 g/d.42
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 12, 2005; first decision March 4, 2005; accepted May 10, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Davis SK, Lui Y, Gibbons GH. Disparities in trends of hospitalization for potentially preventable chronic conditions among African Americans during the 1990s: implications and benchmarks. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 447455.
3. United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2002 Annual Data Report. National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, April 1999. Available at http://www.org/chapters/begin.pdf. Accessibility verified July 8th, 2003.
4. Roderick PJ, Jones I, Raleigh VS McGeown M, and Mallick N. Population need for renal replacement therapy in Thames regions: ethnic dimensions. BMJ. 1994; 309: 11111114.
5. Raleigh VS. Diabetes and hypertension in Britains ethnic minorities: implications for the future of renal services. BMJ. 1997; 314: 209213.
6. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJL; Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002; 360: 13471360.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg. J Am Med Assoc. 1970; 213: 11431152.
8. Grimm RH, Svendsen KH, Kasiske B, Keane WF, Wahi MM. Proteinuria is a risk factor for mortality over 10 years of follow-up. MRFIT Research Group. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Kidney Int Suppl. 1997; 63: S10S14.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Jensen JS, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Strandgaard S, Schroll M, Borch-Johnsen K. Arterial hypertension, microalbuminuria, and risk of ischemic heart disease. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 898903.
10. Dineen SF, Gerstein HC. The association of microalbuminuria and mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157: 14131418.
11. Damsgaard EM, Froland A, Jorgensen OD, Mogensen CE. Microalbuminuria as predictor of increased mortality in elderly people. BMJ. 1990; 300: 297300.
12. Klahr S, Levey AS, Beck GJ, Caggiula AW, Hunsicker L, Kusek JW, Striker G; The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. The effects of dietary protein restriction and blood pressure control on the progression of chronic renal disease. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 877884.
13. Locatelli F, Marcelli D, Comelli D, Alberti D, Graziani G, Buccianti G, Redaelli G, Giangrande A. Proteinuria and blood pressure as causal components to progression to end-stage renal failure. Northern Italian Cooperative Study Group. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996; 11: 461467.
14. Ravid M, Savin H, Jutrin I, Bental T, Katz B, Lishner M. Long term stabilizing effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on plasma creatinine and on proteinuria in normotensive type II diabetics. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118: 577581.
15. The GISEN Group. Randomised placebo controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy. Lancet. 1997; 349: 18571863.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Gherhardi G, Zoccali C, Salvadori M, Scolari F, Schena FP, Remuzzi G. Renoprotective properties of ACE-inhibition in non-diabetic nephropathies with non-nephrotic proteinuria. Lancet. 1999; 345: 359364.
17. Wright JT Jr, Bakris G, Greene T, Agodoa LY, Appel LJ, Charleston J, Cheek D, Douglas-Baltimore JG, Gassman J, Glassock R, Hebert L, Jamerson K, Lewis J, Phillips RA, Toto RD, Middleton JP, Rostand SG; African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension Study Group. Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: results from the AASK trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2002; 288: 24212431.
18. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. Results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion. BMJ. 1988; 297: 319328.
19. Du Cailar G, Ribstein J, Mimran A. Dietary sodium and target organ damage in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2002; 15: 222229.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Yu HCM, Burrell LM, Black MJ, Wu LL, Dilley RJ, Cooper ME, Johnston CI. Salt induces myocardial and renal fibrosis in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Circulation. 1998; 98: 26212628.
21. Cianciaruso B, Bellizzi V, Minutolo R, Tavera A, Capuano A, Conte G, De Nicola L. Salt intake and renal outcome in patients with progressive renal disease. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1998; 24: 296301.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. MacGregor GA, Markandu ND, Best FE, Elder DM, Cam JM, Sagnella GA, Squires M. Double-blind randomised crossover trial of moderate sodium restriction in essential hypertension. Lancet. 1982; 1: 351355.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Luft FC, Grim CE, Fineberg N, Weinberger MC. Effects of volume expansion and contraction in normotensive whites, blacks, and subjects of different ages. Circulation. 1979; 59: 643650.
24. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, Obarzanek E, Conlin PR, Miller ER III, Simons-Morton DG, Karanja N, Lin PH; DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 310.
25. He FJ, Markandu ND, Sagnella GA, MacGregor GA. Importance of the renin system in determining blood pressure fall with salt restriction in black and white hypertensives. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 820824.
26. Svetkey LP, Simons-Morton D, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Conlin PR, Ryan DH, Ard J, Kennedy BM. Effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure: subgroup analysis of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159: 285293.
27. Report of the Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (Geneva, January 28 to February 1, 2002). Available at http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/who_fao_expert_report.pdf. Accessibility verified March 8, 2004.
28. Roulston JE, MacGregor GA. Measurements of plasma renin activity by radioimmunoassay after prolonged cold storage. Clin Chem Acta. 1978; 88: 4548.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Miller MA, Sagnella GA, MacGregor GA. Extraction method and nonextracted kit method compared for measuring plasma aldosterone. Clin Chem. 1997; 10: 19951997.
30. Sagnella GA, Buckley MG, Markandu ND, MacGregor GA. Atrial natriuretic peptide in human plasma: comparison of radioreceptor versus radioimmunoassy. Clin Chim Acta. 1987; 166: 3744.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Chelliah R, Sagnella GA, Markandu MD, MacGregor GA. Urinary protein and essential hypertension in black and in white people. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 10641070.
32. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN). Salt and Health 2003. Published for the Food Standards Agency and the Department of Health Available at: http://www.sacn.gov.uk/pdf/saltfinal.pdf. Accessibility verified March 8, 2004.
33. Luft FC, Grim CE, Higgins JT, Weinberger MH. Differences in response to sodium administration in normotensive whites and black subjects. J Lab Clin Med. 1977; 90: 555562.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Campese VM, Parise M, Karubian F, Bigazzi R. Abnormal renal hemodynamics in black salt-sensitive patients with hypertension. Hypertension. 1999; 18: 805812.
35. Dickerson JEC, Hingorani AD, Ashby MJ, Palmer CR, Brown MJ. Optimisation of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes. Lancet. 1999; 353: 20082013.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Materson BJ, Reda DJ, Cushman WC, Massie BM, Freis ED, Kochar MS, Hamburger RJ, Fye C, Lakshman R, Gottdiener J, Ramirez EA, Henderson WG; The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Single-drug therapy for hypertension in mena comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 914921.
37. MacGreggor GA, Markandu ND, Singer DR, Cappuccio FP, Shore AC, Sagnella GA. Moderate sodium restriction with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in essential hypertension: a double blind study. BMJ. 1987; 294: 531534.
38. Gerstein NC, Mann JFE, Yi Q, Zinman B, Dineen SF, Hoogwerf B, Hallé JP, Young J, Rashkow A, Joyce C, Nawaz S, Yusef S; HOPE Study Investigators. Albuminuria and risk of cardiovascular events, death, and heart failure in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. J Am Med Assoc. 2001; 25: 421426.
39. Hillege HL, Fidler V, Diercks GF, van Gilst WH, de Zeeuw D, van Veldhuisen DJ, Gans RO, Janssen WM, Grobbee DE, de Jong PE; Prevention of Renal and Vascular End Stage Disease (PREVEND) Study Group. Urinary albumin excretion predicts cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in general population. Circulation. 2002; 106: 17771782.
40. Lea JP, Appel LJ, Douglas JG, Faulkner M, Kopple JD, Lightfoot T, Zhang W; AASK Study. Nutritional factors and their relationship to renal function in African Am patients with hypertensive renal disease.(Abstract) J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000; 11: 623A.
41. Heeg JE, de Jong PE, van der Hem GK, de Zeeuw D. Efficacy and variability of the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition by lisinopril. Kidney Int. 1989; 36: 272279.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Blood Pressure Association. Healthy eating and blood pressure. (January 2004). Available at http://www.bpassoc.org.uk. Accessibility verified March 8, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-Z. Ying, K. Aaron, P.-X. Wang, and P. W. Sanders Potassium Inhibits Dietary Salt-Induced Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Production Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 1159 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. He, M. Marciniak, E. Visagie, N. D. Markandu, V. Anand, R. N. Dalton, and G. A. MacGregor Effect of Modest Salt Reduction on Blood Pressure, Urinary Albumin, and Pulse Wave Velocity in White, Black, and Asian Mild Hypertensives Hypertension, September 1, 2009; 54(3): 482 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Agarwal and R. P. Light GFR, proteinuria and circadian blood pressure Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 2400 - 2406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Kalra, E Iveson, C Rambaran, R Sherwood, P Chowienczyk, J Ritter, A Shah, and T Forrester Homocysteine, migration and early vascular impairment in people of African descent Heart, September 1, 2008; 94(9): 1171 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Vogt, F. Waanders, F. Boomsma, D. de Zeeuw, and G. Navis Effects of Dietary Sodium and Hydrochlorothiazide on the Antiproteinuric Efficacy of Losartan J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 999 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ritz Salt--friend or foe? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2052 - 2056. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Khalil Dietary salt and hypertension: new molecular targets add more spice Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): R509 - R513. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |