| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2005;46:313.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology (J.M., F.A., N.J.B.), Cardiovascular Medicine (F.A., D.E.V.), and General Internal Medicine (D.W.B.), the Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology and Biostatistics (C.Y.), and from the General Clinical Research Center (C.Y., D.W.B.), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
Correspondence to Nancy J. Brown, MD, 560 Robinson Research Building, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-6602. E-mail nancy.j.brown{at}vanderbilt.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: renin aldosterone angiotensin II plasminogen
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although these effects of activation and interruption of the RAAS on the fibrinolytic system have been attributed to Ang II, aldosterone also regulates PAI-1 expression. Aldosterone interacts with Ang II to increase PAI-1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and aldosterone alone induces PAI-1 expression in endothelial cells and monocytes through a mineralocorticoid receptor (MR)dependent mechanism.9,10 Although the molecular basis for this interaction has yet to be defined, aldosterone enhances the vasoconstrictor11 and fibrotic effects12 of Ang II by increasing Ang II type 1 receptor binding and signaling.13 In rat models, aldosterone receptor antagonism attenuates renal PAI-1 expression after radiation injury or streptozotocin14,15 and cardiac PAI-1 expression after N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)/Ang II.16 In humans, plasma PAI-1 antigen concentrations correlate with serum aldosterone concentrations in salt-depleted normal controls, hypertensive subjects, and individuals with primary hyperaldosteronism.6,8,9
A study comparing the effects of the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ; 25 mg) per day with spironolactone (100 mg per day) on fibrinolytic balance in hypertensive subjects supports the hypothesis that aldosterone increases PAI-1 synthesis in humans.6 In that study, although HCTZ and spironolactone increased Ang II and aldosterone, only HCTZ increased PAI-1 antigen concentrations. Moreover, MR antagonism abolished the relationship between aldosterone and plasma PAI-1 concentrations in hypertensive subjects.6 However, interpretation of the previous study was confounded by the fact that serum potassium concentrations were higher and systolic blood pressure (SBP) was lower during spironolactone treatment compared with during HCTZ treatment.
Therefore, the present study tests the hypothesis that spironolactone attenuates the effect of activation of the RAAS on PAI-1 concentrations in humans through an effect of MR antagonism rather than through an indirect effect of increased potassium. To do this, we compared the effects of spironolactone and the MR-independent, potassium-sparing diuretic triamterene on fibrinolytic balance in subjects pretreated with HCTZ to activate their RAAS. HCTZ was chosen as the diuretic to reflect the clinical administration of combined HCTZ/potassium-sparing diuretic.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each subject completed 5 study days over a 12-week period. Antihypertensive medications were discontinued 3 weeks before the first study day. Each subject collected his urine for 24 hours before each study day for measurement of sodium and potassium excretion. On the morning of each study day, subjects reported to the Vanderbilt General Clinical Research Center at 7 AM in the fasting state. An indwelling catheter was placed in an antecubital vein for blood drawing. Blood for measurement of PAI-1 and t-PA antigen, plasma renin activity (PRA), Ang II, aldosterone, insulin, proinsulin, potassium, and glucose was drawn after subjects had been supine for 30 minutes. Thereafter, PA11 and t-PA were measured hourly, and RAAS parameters were measured every 2 hours for a total of 4 hours. Thirty minutes after the last blood sample, supine blood pressure was measured in triplicate in the right arm.
After the first study day, each subject was treated with 12.5 mg of HCTZ per day for 4 weeks, and the study day was repeated. The dose of HCTZ was chosen on the basis of the usual starting dose. Subjects were then randomized using a permutated block method to 2-week treatment with spironolactone (50 mg per day), or triamterene (50 mg per day), and the study day was repeated. After the third study day, subjects continued taking 12.5 mg per day of HCTZ alone for 4 weeks (washout period), and study day 4 was performed. After the fourth study day, subjects were crossed over to either spironolactone or triamterene for 2 weeks, and the final fifth study day was completed. All medications were prepared by the Vanderbilt University Investigational Drug Service in identical-appearing capsules. Serum potassium and blood pressure were measured at least weekly during active medication. A serum potassium
5.5 mEq/L resulted in exclusion from the protocol (no subjects). A serum potassium
3.5 mEq/L resulted in potassium supplementation (12 subjects during HCTZ alone).
Laboratory Analysis
For laboratory analysis, please see the online supplement, available at http://www.hypertensionaha.org.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as means±SDs. One subject was discontinued from the protocol because of anemia before the last study day, and missing values for that day were imputed based on series means. The results of data analyses were similar if the data from this subject were excluded. The inclusion of 2 HCTZ periods in the study design allowed us to test for carryover effects using the methods of Kenward and Jones.17 Significantly, in the spironolactone-to-triamterene sequence, we found a carryover effect on PRA (for example, 10 AM PRA 0.6±0.4 versus 2.6±6.9 ng Ang I/mL per hour [P=0.05] during the first and second HCTZ study days in the spironolactone-to-triamterene sequence and 1.4±1.3 versus 1.1±0.9 ng Ang I/mL per hour in the triamterene-to-spironolactone treatment sequence). In addition, in hypertensives randomized to the spironolactone-to-triamterene sequence, there was also a carryover effect on PAI-1 (P values 0.09, 0.03, 0.26, 0.12, and 0.08 for treatment-by-period interaction for PAI-1 antigen concentrations at 8 AM, 9 AM, 10 AM, 11 AM, and 12 PM). Given this evidence for a carryover effect and the prolonged half-life of the active metabolite of spironolactone, we therefore treated the study as a parallel design study, analyzing only the data from the first 3 study days. General linear models were used to compare treatments while controlling for covariates such as subject type (normotensive or hypertensive). A MannWhitney test or an unpaired t test was used for post hoc comparisons (provided in tables) as appropriate. A 2-tailed P value <0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 11.0; SPSS).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Hemodynamic and Electrolyte Effects of Treatment
HCTZ alone did not significantly affect SBP or DBP (Table 1); however, the addition of either spironolactone or triamterene significantly lowered SBP and DBP compared with baseline. The change in SBP and DBP and the absolute SBP and DBP were similar in the spironolactone and triamterene groups, within either normotensive or hypertensive subjects. There was no effect of spironolactone or triamterene on heart rate and no difference in heart rate between spironolactone and triamterene treatment groups.
Serum potassium was decreased significantly during treatment with HCTZ compared with baseline in normotensive (P<0.001) and hypertensive (P=0.040) subjects (Table 1) despite potassium supplementation in 12 of 38 subjects. Potassium supplementation was discontinued during administration of spironolactone or triamterene. For this reason, potassium concentrations were similar during HCTZ and during HCTZ plus spironolactone or HCTZ plus triamterene. Serum potassium was similar in the spironolactone and triamterene treatment groups. There was no effect of treatment on urine sodium or potassium excretion in normotensive subjects. HCTZ increased urinary potassium excretion in the hypertensive subjects (P=0.049). Within normotensive and hypertensive subjects, urine sodium or potassium excretion was similar in the spironolactone and triamterene treatment groups.
Effect of Treatment on the RAAS and Metabolic Parameters
Table 2 illustrates the effect of treatment on PRA, Ang II, and aldosterone concentrations at specific time points. There was a significant effect of time on Ang II (P=0.001) and aldosterone (P=0.003). HCTZ alone significantly increased PRA at 8 AM (P=0.010 in normotensive subjects; P=0.008 in hypertensive subjects), and the addition of spironolactone or triamterene increased PRA further (P=0.043 versus HCTZ alone in normotensives; P=0.001 in hypertensives). Treatment with spironolactone or triamterene also increased PRA at 10 AM compared with HCTZ alone (Table 2). PRA was equivalent during spironolactone and triamterene treatment. PRA was significantly lower in hypertensive subjects compared with normotensive subjects (P=0.001 at 8 AM; P=0.010 at 10 AM).
|
There was no effect of treatment with HCTZ alone on circulating Ang II concentrations. Addition of either spironolactone or triamterene significantly increased Ang II compared with baseline in the hypertensive subjects (P=0.025 at 0800; P=0.032 for all time points); however, there was no difference between the effect of spironolactone and triamterene on Ang II concentrations. Ang II concentrations were statistically similar in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.
There was no effect of treatment with HCTZ alone on aldosterone concentrations. The addition of either spironolactone or triamterene significantly increased aldosterone concentrations compared with baseline (P<0.001 at each time point) and HCTZ alone (P<0.001 at 8 AM; P=0.001 at 10 AM and 12 PM) in normotensive but not hypertensive subjects, and the effect of the 2 drugs was similar. Aldosterone concentrations were significantly lower during spironolactone or triamterene in hypertensive subjects compared with normotensive subjects (P=0.003, P=0.007, and P=0.06 for effect of hypertension at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 12 PM, respectively).
Table 3 shows the effect of treatment on metabolic variables. Insulin concentrations (P=0.042) and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; P=0.036) were significantly higher in hypertensive subjects than in normotensive subjects. There was no effect of treatment on glucose or proinsulin concentrations. Treatment with either spironolactone or triamterene significantly increased insulin concentrations (P=0.034) and HOMA-IR (P=0.022) in the combined groups, and the effect on insulin tended to be greater with spironolactone (P=0.05 for effect of drug). However, there was no effect of spironolactone or triamterene on insulin or HOMA-IR, analyzed within normotensive or hypertensive subjects.
|
Effect of Treatment on Fibrinolysis
The Figure shows the effect of treatment on average (from 8 AM to 12 PM) morning PAI-1 and t-PA antigen concentrations for each subject. As reported previously,8 there was significant diurnal variation in PAI-1 (P<0.001 for effect of time) and t-PA antigen (P=0.032) concentrations and for the molar ratio of PAI-1 to t-PA (P=0.004). Therefore, although time was treated initially as a repeated measure in the ANOVA, additional analyses were performed at each time point. Table 4 shows the change in PAI-1 and t-PA antigen concentrations from HCTZ alone after the addition of spironolactone or triamterene at each time point.
|
|
Baseline PAI-1 concentrations were similar among the treatment groups (5.8±5.1, 6.9±4.4, 11.8±16.5, and 9.0±4.9 ng/mL in spironolactone- and triamterene-treated normotensive and spironolactone- and triamterene-treated hypertensive groups, respectively; P=0.530). HCTZ alone tended to increase the 8 AM (P=0.073) and 9 AM (P=0.056) PAI-1 antigen concentrations. This effect was significant in the hypertensive subjects treated subsequently with spironolactone at 9 AM (P=0.030). However, there was no difference in the change in PAI-1 in response to HCTZ alone (P=0.171) or in PAI-1 antigen concentrations during HCTZ among the 4 treatment groups (P=0.161). Addition of spironolactone or triamterene exerted opposing effects on PAI-1 antigen (P=0.006 effect of drug for all time points), and there was a significant interactive effect of treatment with hypertension status (P=0.021). Hence, in normotensive subjects, there was no effect of spironolactone on PAI-1 antigen, but triamterene significantly increased PAI-1 antigen (from 10.1±7.8 to 16.9±9.9 ng/mL at 9 AM, P=0.019; from 7.6±5.4 to 11.5±7.3 ng/mL at 11 AM, P=0.027; from 9.3±7.7 to 13.7±8.5 ng/mL for the average of all time points, P=0.054). In contrast, in hypertensive subjects, spironolactone decreased PAI-1 antigen compared with HCTZ alone (from 22.0±23.4 to 16.7±19.0 ng/mL at 10 AM, P=0.041; from 17.5±21.7 to 12.7±16.8 ng/mL at 11 AM, P=0.043; from 20.3±22.6 to 16.6±19.7 ng/mL for the average of all time points, P=0.014), whereas there was no effect of triamterene on PAI-1.
Although there was no difference in PAI-1 antigen concentrations during HCTZ between spironolactone- and triamterene-treated subjects, because HCTZ increased PAI-1 antigen significantly only in the spironolactone-treated hypertensive subjects, we performed regression analysis to determine whether the effect of drug treatment on PAI-1 antigen depended on the initial PAI-1 response to HCTZ. Predictors of the PAI-1 response to therapy were the drug (P=0.014 for spironolactone versus triamterene), hypertension (P=0.002), and previous PAI-1 response to HCTZ (P=0.019). Aldosterone tended to predict PAI-1 response to therapy (P=0.061). There was no significant effect of race, gender, age, body mass index, PRA, Ang II, or potassium.
There was no effect of HCTZ alone on t-PA antigen. Addition of either spironolactone or triamterene significantly increased t-PA antigen compared with baseline (P=0.003), and there was no significant difference between the 2 drugs. Thus, the net effect was that spironolactone significantly decreased the molar ratio of PAI-1 to t-PA antigen compared with HCTZ alone in hypertensive patients (P=0.025 at 8 AM; P=0.007 at 9 AM), whereas triamterene did not.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two groups have reported that treatment with HCTZ increases PAI-1 concentrations in normotensive or hypertensive individuals.6,19,20 Although in the present study, 12.5 mg per day of HCTZ alone tended to increase early morning circulating PAI-1 antigen, this effect attained significance only in the hypertensive subjects subsequently randomized to spironolactone. Normotensive and hypertensive subjects were studied because circulating PAI-1 concentrations are increased in insulin-resistant and hypertensive individuals compared with normotensive individuals.22,23 The effect of HCTZ on PAI-1 antigen may also be greater in hypertensive individuals compared with normotensive individuals.6,20 Moreover, in hypertensive subjects, the effect of HCTZ appears to be dose dependent.6,19 In this study, PAI-1 concentrations were 40% versus 22% higher during 12.5 mg per day of HCTZ in the hypertensive and normotensive subjects, respectively.
Surprisingly, 12.5 mg per day of HCTZ induced hypokalemia, requiring supplementation in almost one third of study participants. This may reflect the low dietary potassium intake observed in this and studies in similar populations.24 Spironolactone and triamterene exerted similar effects on blood pressure and serum potassium. Spironolactone and triamterene activated the RAAS. The comparable effect of triamterene and spironolactone on the RAAS suggests that activation resulted largely from volume depletion. MR antagonists may also increase renin and aldosterone25 through loss of feedback inhibition, as well as a direct effect on aldosterone synthase activity.26
Despite the fact that spironolactone and triamterene activated the RAAS, the effect of the 2 drugs on fibrinolytic balance differed significantly. Thus, triamterene worsened fibrinolytic balance in normotensive subjects and was neutral in hypertensive subjects, whereas spironolactone was neutral in normotensive subjects but improved fibrinolytic balance in hypertensive subjects. The different effect of these 2 drugs on fibrinolytic balance cannot be attributed to any metabolic effects but, rather, may reflect differences in their mechanisms of action. Whereas triamterene acts by blocking apical sodium channels,27 spironolactone antagonizes the MR. In vitro and in vivo, MR antagonism with spironolactone or its metabolite canrenone decreases PAI-1 expression in VSMCs, endothelial cells, monocytes, the heart, and kidney.9,10,1416 The potassium independence of the effect of spironolactone on fibrinolytic balance is consistent with studies in animals and in humans, demonstrating potassium-independent cardiovascular effects of MR blockade. For example, MR blockade but not potassium prevents L-NAME/Ang IIinduced myocardial injury in rats,28 and spironolactone but not the potassium-sparing diuretic amiloride improves endothelial function in chronic heart failure.29,30
The differential effects of spironolactone and triamterene in normotensive and hypertensive subjects in the present study may reflect the relative activity of the RAAS in these 2 groups. Compared with the normotensive subjects, the hypertensive subjects had lower PRA and a diminished aldosterone response to spironolactone or triamterene, but were relatively insulin resistant. Thus, in normotensive subjects, increased activation of the RAAS may have driven the increase in PAI-1 after triamterene and MR blockade with spironolactone may have only partially overcome this. In contrast, in hypertensive subjects, MR blockade may have been sufficient to overcome the modest activation of the RAAS.
In this context, the data from the present study are compatible with 2 previous studies reporting the effect of spironolactone on fibrinolytic balance. Our group has reported previously that spironolactone prevented the effect of activation of the RAAS on PAI-1 antigen and significantly increased t-PA antigen in a group of male hypertensive subjects.6 This is similar to the effect of spironolactone observed in normotensive subjects in the present study, in which group the PRA was comparable to that measured in the hypertensive subjects of the previous study. However, as observed in hypertensive subjects in the current study Yalcin et al reported that treatment with 50 mg per day of spironolactone significantly decreased PAI-1 and increased t-PA antigen in 14 hypertensive subjects; renin data were not provided.21 Thus, it would appear that spironolactone consistently increases t-PA antigen, whereas the effect on PAI-1 may depend on the extent of activation of the RAAS.
A limitation of this investigation was the detection of a carryover effect in the spironolactone-to-triamterene sequence of the original crossover study, requiring us to treat the study instead as a parallel design study and analyze data only from the first treatment period. Such an unpaired analysis decreases the power to detect treatment effects, and the normotensive groups were not matched with respect to age. Although we cannot exclude a confounding effect of age on the differing fibrinolytic response to spironolactone and triamterene in normotensive subjects, there was no relationship between age and PAI-1 concentrations. Moreover, the design of the study to include a baseline HCTZ period before each active treatment may be viewed as a strength that allowed for the detection of the carryover effect despite a 4-week washout.
The results of this study should be interpreted in the light of randomized clinical trials. Low-dose thiazide diuretics have been shown to reduce mortality in trials such as Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP),31 Medical Research Council (MRC) trial,32 and the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).33 Epidemiological studies indicate that the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients treated with thiazide diuretics correlates inversely with dose and with the use of potassium-sparing diuretics.34 On the other hand, the present study suggests that clinical trials are needed to compare the effects of combined HCTZ/MR blockade versus HCTZ/triamterene on cardiovascular mortality.
Perspectives
Two large clinical trials have now demonstrated a beneficial effect of MR blockade on mortality in patients with congestive heart failure who have already been treated with ACE inhibitor and diuretics.35,36 The specific mechanism(s) underlying the beneficial effect of MR antagonism are not known. MR antagonism may prevent sudden death by increasing serum potassium or altering myocardial uptake of norepinephrine,37 by improving endothelial function,29 or by decreasing cardiovascular remodeling.38 The present study suggests improved fibrinolytic balance may represent another mechanism whereby MR antagonism could protect diuretic-treated patients from fibrosis and thrombotic cardiovascular events.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 4, 2005; first decision April 21, 2005; accepted May 3, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Brown Aldosterone and Vascular Inflammation Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 161 - 167. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Luther, J. V. Gainer, L. J. Murphey, C. Yu, D. E. Vaughan, J. D. Morrow, and N. J. Brown Angiotensin II Induces Interleukin-6 in Humans Through a Mineralocorticoid Receptor-Dependent Mechanism Hypertension, December 1, 2006; 48(6): 1050 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Schiffrin Effects of Aldosterone on the Vasculature Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 312 - 318. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Williams Cardiovascular Benefits of Aldosterone Receptor Antagonists: What About Potassium? Hypertension, August 1, 2005; 46(2): 265 - 266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |