| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2005;46:1026.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Part 2 Original Articles |
From Department of Physiology, Tulane Hypertension and Renal Center of Excellence, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, La.
Correspondence to Dewan S.A. Majid, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, SL 39, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail majid{at}tulane.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hypertension kidney nitric oxide
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Oxidative stress has been suggested to be involved in the pathophysiology of many forms of hypertension;8,9 however, the exact mechanism is not yet fully understood. Scavenging of O2 significantly reduces blood pressure in different models of hypertension,10,11 especially those associated with salt-sensitivity.12,13 Previous studies have indicated that inhibition of NO generation during high-salt intake leads to the development of salt-sensitive hypertension and the impairment of kidney function.1416 Thus, the increases in O2 level caused by NO deficiency may significantly contribute to the development of salt-sensitive forms of hypertension.
The specific aim of this study was to examine the role of O2 generation in the development of salt-sensitive hypertension during chronic nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition in rats. To induce NO deficiency, chronic treatment with NOS inhibitor, nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) was given to rats during normal and high-salt intake.14,17 Blood pressure and excretory responses were evaluated with or without co-treatment of O2 scavenger, tempol (4-hydroxy-tetramethylpiperidime-1-oxyl), during the course of 4-week treatment with L-NAME in these rats.10,18,19
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
L-NAME at a dose of 15 mg/kg per day was given in drinking water for a 4-week experimental period. This dose of L-NAME was previously used by other investigators14,17 as an adequate dose to achieve near-maximal inhibition of NOS in the body. Tempol was also added with L-NAME to the drinking water at a dose of 30 mg/kg per day as previously reported.10,18,19 This dose of tempol was adequate to decrease blood pressure and plasma or urine 8-isoprostane levels in hypertensive rats.10,18,19 Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured by tail-cuff plethysmography. Basal blood pressure was measured for 3 consecutive days before the starting the protocol and then at 3- to 4-day intervals during the 4-week study period. The 24-hour urine collection was performed in metabolic cages on the day before the start of treatment to establish basal excretory parameters and then on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of experiment. Body weight and water intake were also recorded on each day of urine collections. The status of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed by calculating creatinine clearance to assess the differences in overall kidney function in these groups of experimental animals. To determine creatinine concentration in plasma samples, arterial blood samples were collected from a carotid arterial cannula placed in rats under anesthesia (pentobarbital, 50 mg/kg intraperitoneal).
Analytical Methods and Statistics
Urinary excretion of sodium and potassium were assessed by flame photometry. Concentration of 8-isoprostane in urine samples was determined by enzyme immunoassay (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Mich)10,18 and H2O2 concentration was measured by colorimetric assay (Cayman Chemical).20 Nitrate/nitrite (NOx) concentration was also measured colorimetrically (Assay Design, Ann Arbor, Mich).6,20 To estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), creatinine clearance was calculated from the plasma and urine concentration determined colorimetrically. Results are expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical comparisons within groups were conducted by the use of ANOVA for repeated measurements, followed by Newman-Keuls test. Unpaired Student t test was used for comparisons between groups. Statistical significance is defined at a value of P=0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Excretory Responses
Urine volumes collected for 24 hours are given in the Table. In addition, recorded body weight and 24-hour water intake are also given in the Table. It was observed that an age-related weight gains in these animals were slightly less in L-NAMEtreated animals compared with untreated group in both NS- and HS-fed rats. Such a slight decrease in weight gain was not seen in groups of rats co-treated with tempol. Thus, the retention of sodium caused by L-NAME administration did not cause any weight gains in these groups of animals. We also observed that the water intake was mostly remained unchanged during L-NAME or L-NAME plus tempol treatment though generally HS intake groups showed higher water intake compared with NS groups as expected (Table).
|
The responses in urinary excretion rate of NO metabolites, nitrate/nitrite (UNOxV), to treatment with L-NAME and tempol in these experimental animals are shown in Figure 2. As expected, UNOxV was significantly lower in L-NAMEtreated animals in both NS (21.1±1.2 to 14.8±0.9 µmol/d) and HS intake groups (21.8±1.6 to 11.7±0.7 µmol/d). Co-treatment with tempol did not alter the observed reduction in UNOxV induced by inhibition of NO generation either in the NS (15.6±1.3 µmol/d) or in the HS group (13.5±0.9 µmol/d). As shown in Figure 3, urinary 8-isoprostane excretion (UISOV) caused by chronic L-NAME treatment for 4 weeks was significantly higher in both NS (16.9±0.3 ng/d) and HS (21.5±0.8 ng/d) groups compared with corresponding NS (12.5±0.7 ng/d) and HS (13.7±0.9 ng/d) control group, indicating that NO deficiency leads to higher O2 activity. However, co-administration of tempol completely abolished UISOV responses to L-NAME in both NS (13.8±0.7 ng/d) and HS (15.8±0.9 ng/d) groups, indicating that the dose of tempol effectively reduces O2 activity in these rats during NOS inhibition. In NS rats, L-NAME treatment caused slightly but significantly lower sodium excretion on days 21 and 28 compared with the NS nontreated rats (Figure 4A). In the NS L-NAME plus tempol-treated group, sodium excretion was higher compared with the NS L-NAMEtreated group. HS intake caused expected increases in sodium excretion compared with NS groups (Figure 4B). However, in the HS L-NAME group, sodium excretion was significantly lower on days 7, 14, and 21 compared with the HS nontreated group. In the HS L-NAME plus tempol-treated group, sodium excretion was significantly higher than that in the HS L-NAME group.
|
|
|
The urinary excretion rate of H2O2 (UH2O2V) was determined in the samples collected from the experimental animals at the end of week 4 of treatment period. The results are illustrated in Figure 5. We observed that administration of L-NAME did not alter UH2O2V significantly in these rats fed NS or HS diets. Co-administration of tempol with L-NAME did not cause any significant increase in UH2O2V in both HS and NS groups. However, it was observed that UH2O2V was higher in nontreated HS group of rats compared with that in nontreated NS groups as reported earlier in another study.21
|
At the end of 4 weeks, creatinine clearance was calculated to determine the changes in estimated GFR (Figure 6). Attenuated creatinine clearances caused by chronic L-NAME treatment in both NS and HS rats compared with nontreated groups were partially restored in groups co-treated with tempol, suggesting that the decrease in GFR during NOS blockade is partly caused by enhancement of O2 activity in the kidney.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been demonstrated that NOS inhibition enhances vascular O2 release both in rats23,24 and in humans,25 and such enhanced O2 production was abolished by the use of a O2 scavenger.25 Although we did not measure directly the O2 level in the present study, we observed that UISOV (a marker for endogenous O2 activity) increased in L-NAMEtreated rats and the response was greater in the HS group of rats compared with that in the NS group (Figure 3). These UISOV responses to L-NAME were completely prevented in rats co-treated with tempol indicating an increase in O2 activity during NOS inhibition. In our previous studies in dogs,6,20 we also observed an increase in UISOV during acute NOS inhibition in the kidney that was ameliorated by co-administration of tempol.
Although L-NAMEinduced SBP response was much greater in the HS intake group compared with the NS intake group, tempol treatment caused attenuation of SBP to similar levels in both groups that are not significantly different from each other (Figure 1). Because tempol administration abolished the differences in hypertensive responses to L-NAME during varying salt intake, these findings indicate that the development of salt-sensitivity induced by chronic NOS inhibition is mainly attributed to increases in endogenous O2 activity. Tempol treatment did not alter UNOxV in the NOS inhibited rats, indicating that the blood pressure lowering effect of tempol in the present study was not caused by reversal of NO bioavailability but rather was caused by decreases in O2 activity. It has also been shown that tempol treatment significantly attenuates blood pressure in several hypertensive models that are particularly associated with salt-sensitivity.12,13,18,26 Thus, the results of present investigation further support an important role of O2 in the development of salt-sensitivity in NO-deficient hypertension.
It may be argued that tempol as a SOD mimetic lead to increases in H2O2 levels that influence the SBP responses in rats in the present investigation. However, it was observed that tempol administration in L-NAMEtreated rats did not cause any significant increase in UH2O2V in both HS and NS groups (Figure 5). Thus, it would argue against any significant contribution of H2O2 in the observed marked attenuation of the SBP responses to tempol in L-NAMEtreated rats. Although the effects of catalase administration after tempol treatment had not been examined in the present study, we have reported earlier that acute administration of tempol did not alter UH2O2V either in dogs20 or in normotensive, as well as angiotensin IIinduced hypertensive rats.27 We also observed that there was no significant difference between the renal responses to intra-arterial administration of tempol with or without catalase in rats.27 As reported previously,21 UH2O2V was seen higher in nontreated HS group of rats compared with that in nontreated NS groups in our present study. It is to be noted here that such differences in UH2O2V was observed, although blood pressure levels are similar in both nontreated NS and HS groups. However, the effects of a possible change in vascular level of H2O2 during tempol administration are yet to be determined conclusively.21,24,2830 It has been shown that H2O2 acts as a vasodilator,24,30 implicating that enhancement of its vascular level would cause a decrease in blood pressure. However, some studies have implicated that increases in renal medullary tissue H2O2 level causes hypertension in rats,28,29 an effect that is opposite to the present finding of tempol-induced reduction in SBP.
Oxidative stress and hypertension are closely associated with higher sympathetic activity.31,32 Thus, it could be argued that tempol-induced changes in blood pressure observed in the present study may be influenced by its inhibitory effects on sympathetic activity32 or antioxidant-induced changes in the release of norepinephrine from the nerve terminals.33 However, it was also demonstrated that enhanced O2 activity by SOD inhibition can cause stimulation of sympathetic activity that was shown to be inhibited by tempol.34 Thus, reduction of endogenous O2 activity by tempol administration can indirectly be associated with a possible reduction in sympathetic activity in hypertensive rats in the present study.
The exact mechanism that produces increases in the endogenous level of O2 during NOS inhibition is not yet clear. Both NO and O2 are constant products of cellular metabolism, and both of these molecules are constantly interacting with each other in biological tissues.5 Normally, O2 in the tissue is kept to a minimal level by the antioxidative function of SOD as well as NO. However, when NO production is diminished in the tissue, it is expected that this balance may be altered allowing O2 accumulation in the tissue because of its inadequate removal by NO.6 It is also possible that the activity of enzymes responsible for endogenous production of O2 may be upregulated during NOS inhibition.35 Further experiments are required to determine the activity of these oxidative enzymes during NO synthase inhibition.
In conclusion, these data demonstrate that the enhanced O2 activity caused by chronic NOS inhibition contributes to the development of salt sensitivity that is involved in the pathophysiology of the NO-deficient form of hypertension.
Perspectives
The findings of this present study further support our previous observations indicating an important role of the interaction between O2 and NO in the regulation of renal function and blood pressure.49 NO provides a protective role against the actions of O2 by acting as an important antioxidative agent in the body. The development of any imbalance between oxidative and antioxidative processes in living tissues would lead to derangements in organ function including the kidney. The results of the present study, which demonstrate a close relation between enhancement of O2 activity and the development of salt sensitivity during NOS inhibition, provide an important clue in our quest in understanding the pathophysiology of salt-sensitive hypertension. Thus, it is imperative that further emphasis should be focused on complete elucidation of the interactive role of O2 and NO in the regulation of many organ functions to increase our knowledge on physiology as well as pathophysiologic processes of many diseases that are linked to NO metabolism and oxidative stress.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant HL-51306.
Received April 28, 2005; first decision May 15, 2005; accepted June 13, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. L. Graciano, C. R. Mouton, M. E. Patterson, D. M. Seth, J. J. Mullins, and K. D. Mitchell Renal vascular and tubulointerstitial inflammation and proliferation in Cyp1a1-Ren2 transgenic rats with inducible ANG II-dependent malignant hypertension Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): F1858 - F1866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Hong and J. L. Garvin Flow increases superoxide production by NADPH oxidase via activation of Na-K-2Cl cotransport and mechanical stress in thick ascending limbs Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): F993 - F998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kopkan, A. Castillo, L. G. Navar, and D. S. A. Majid Enhanced superoxide generation modulates renal function in ANG II-induced hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): F80 - F86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |