| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2005;46:1123.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Vascular Diseases Research Unit (F.K., J.J.F.B.), The Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Maternal and Child Health Sciences (M.M., G.M.), Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Faisel Khan, Vascular Diseases Research Unit, The Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK. E-mail f.khan{at}dundee.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endothelium-derived factors hypertension microcirculation nitric oxide preeclampsia pregnancy
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In PE there is accumulating evidence for a pathogenic model whereby deficient trophoblast invasion of the maternal spiral arteries leads to a poorly perfused feto-placental unit.3 This results in secretion of a factor(s) by the placenta into the maternal circulation, which activates the vascular endothelium.4,5 However, although endothelial dysfunction appears to be a key player in the pathophysiology of PE, there appears to be a difference in the way in which endothelial damage is expressed depending on the particular vascular bed studied. For example, arterial endothelial function, assessed using ultrasound measurements of flow-mediated dilatation, is diminished in women who have PE compared with normal pregnant women.68 Conversely in the microcirculation, endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is increased in women who have PE to levels over and above those seen in normal pregnancy.9 After pregnancy, however, both arterial and microvascular endothelial functions are diminished in women who had PE.1012 This suggests that either endothelial dysfunction is present before pregnancy and predisposes women to PE, or that PE induces long-term changes in endothelial function, which could have implications for development of cardiovascular disease in later life.
There is no study however, that has examined vascular responses sequentially at different gestations before the clinical syndrome of PE develops and after delivery (to compare maternal from placental influences), and compared these changes to those in women who remain normotensive. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to measure endothelial function at 22, 26, and 34 weeks gestation and 6 weeks postpartum in women identified as being at increased risk for PE, based on uterine artery Doppler waveforms at 18 to 20 weeks, and control subjects with normal Doppler waveforms. We chose uterine arterial notching as a means of identifying a cohort of women at increased risk of PE based on the findings from a previous study that demonstrated a relative risk of early onset PE of 26.2 (95% CI, 11.0 to 62.4) in women with bilateral uterine arterial notching at 18 to 20 weeks gestation.13 We sought to determine whether changes in endothelial function in PE occur before the clinical development of the disease and whether such changes persist after delivery.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
140 mm Hg or a diastolic pressure of
90 mm Hg on
2 separate occasions after week 20 of pregnancy in a woman who was normotensive at booking (first trimester) and 6 weeks postnatally, in the presence of significant proteinuria (either >300 mg/L in a 24-hour collection or
2+ on a voided random urine sample in the absence of urinary tract infection).14 Gestational hypertension was defined as hypertension arising de novo in pregnancy without proteinuria.14
|
|
The individualized birth weight ratio was used to define intrauterine growth restriction; individualized birth weight ratio corrects birth weight for gestational age, taking into account confounding variables of maternal height and weight, ethnic origin, parity, and infant sex and was calculated using the UK Perinatal Institutes online calculator.15 Pregnancies with an individualized birth weight ratio <10 were defined as growth-restricted.
The study was approved by the Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics and conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects gave written informed consent to their participation.
Microvascular Function
Measurements of microvascular function were performed at 22, 26, and 34 weeks gestation, and at 6 weeks after delivery in a laboratory set at 22±1°C. Participants were seated with their arms supported at heart level. We assessed forearm microvascular function, as described previously,16 by measuring skin vascular responses to iontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh; Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP; David Bull Laboratories). Iontophoresis is a drug-delivery method that stimulates the migration of charged ions across the skin noninvasively and without inducing systemic effects. We used a delivery current of 100 µA and administered each drug as a successive accumulation of 10-, 20-, 40-, and 80-second doses, ie, effectively, 1, 2, 4, and 8 millicoulomb (mC). Using a current of 100 µA and large-diameter electrodes does not elicit vasodilatation via nonspecific galvanic effects, because a low charge density (maximum of 2.5x102 mC/mm2) is generated.17
Microvascular skin blood flow was assessed using laser Doppler imaging (moorLDI; Moor Instruments Ltd). This technique works by scanning a 2-mW heliumneon laser across the surface of the skin. Light that is backscattered from moving erythrocytes undergoes a shift in frequency proportional to their velocity, according to the Doppler principle. The resulting color-coded image represents skin blood flow over the scan area; a relative measure called the laser Doppler flux. Baseline scans of skin perfusion (without drug delivery) were taken before the iontophoresis protocol was administered. The median laser Doppler flux over the baseline and drug-delivery site was calculated for each image using dedicated image-processing software (Moor Instruments Ltd). For each dose response, the mean of the 2 highest stable flux values was calculated, and this was divided by the baseline measurement to give a ratio representing the change in flow.
This combination of iontophoresis and laser Doppler imaging has been used successfully by us and others in many studies,1618 and good reproducibility of the technique has been confirmed.19,20 A recent study by Hansell et al showed that skin microvascular responses to iontophoretically applied ACh significantly correlated with flow-mediated dilatation in the brachial artery.21
All measurements and calculations were performed by a researcher who was blinded as to whether the subject was normotensive or had PE.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 12.0 for Windows. Results are presented as means±SEM. Data for microvascular responses were not normally distributed and were therefore log-transformed to achieve normality. Differences in vascular responses at different time points within subject groups, and between normal and preeclamptic groups, were tested using ANOVA for repeated measures, followed by modified post hoc t tests when a significant difference was found. Correlations were performed using the Spearman-rank method. In all cases, significance was acknowledged if the probability of a type-1 error was <5% (ie, P<0.05).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 2 shows the clinical characteristics of women with normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. Fifty-four women had a normal pregnancy (mean age, 27.4; range, 15 to 37 years) and PE developed in 15 women PE (mean age, 25.3; range, 20 to 31 years). In the PE group the maximum recorded blood pressure was in all cases within 4 days of delivery (mean, 2.4 days; range, 1 to 4 days).
|
Comparison of Vascular Responses
There were no significant differences in vascular responses to ACh and SNP between women with normal and abnormal Doppler waveforms at any time point (Table 3).
|
Baseline skin perfusion (mean±SE in arbitrary perfusion units [PU]) was not significantly different between normal and preeclamptic women at 22 weeks (55.5±1.9 versus 52.5±3.0 PU, respectively), 26 weeks (56.4±2.1 versus 51.6±2.6 PU), 34 weeks (53.1±1.8 versus 50.9±4.3 PU), and postpartum (51.6±1.9 versus 58.8±4.0 PU).
In women with normal pregnancies, vascular responses to ACh were not significantly different at 22, 26, and 34 weeks but were significantly enhanced compared with postpartum responses (ANOVA P<0.001, P<0.001, and P<0.05, respectively) (Table 4). Post-hoc analysis comparing postpartum responses with those at 22 and 26 weeks showed significant differences at doses of 2, 4, and 8 mC (P<0.01). For comparisons between postpartum responses and those at 34 weeks, significant differences were found at 2 mC (P<0.05) and at 4 and 8 mC (P<0.01). Peak ACh responses were 13% higher at 34 weeks compared with postpartum responses. In contrast, SNP responses were similar at all time points (Table 4).
|
In preeclamptic women, there was a progressive increase in ACh responses from 22 to 26 and 34 weeks (ANOVA, P<0.01 for both), followed by a decrease postpartum. Post-hoc analysis comparing responses at 22 weeks with those at 26 and 34 weeks showed significant differences at doses of 2, 4, and 8 mC (P<0.01). ACh responses at 26 and 34 weeks were significantly greater than those postpartum (ANOVA, P<0.001 for both). Post-hoc analysis showed significant differences at doses of 2, 4, and 8 mC (P<0.001). Peak ACh responses were 34% higher at 34 weeks compared with postpartum responses. There was a smaller, but still significant, increase in SNP responses from 22 to 26 weeks (ANOVA, P<0.01) (post-hoc differences at doses of 2, 4, and 8 mC; P<0.01), followed by a reduction postpartum. SNP responses at 22, 26, and 34 weeks were all significantly greater than those post partum (ANOVA, P<0.005 for all). Post-hoc analysis comparing post partum responses with those at 22 and 34 weeks showed significant differences at doses of 2, 4, and 8 mC (P<0.05), and at 26 weeks differences were seen at doses of 2, 4, and 8 mC (P<0.001).
Vascular responses to ACh were not significantly different between normal and preeclamptic women at 22 weeks and 6 weeks postpartum (Table 4). At 26 and 34 weeks, however, ACh responses were significantly augmented in preeclamptic women compared with normal women (ANOVA, P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). Post-hoc analysis at 26 weeks showed significant differences at doses of 2, 4 (P<0.05), and 8 mC (P<0.01), and at 34 weeks at doses of 2, 4, and 8 mC (P<0.01).
SNP responses were significantly augmented in preeclamptic women compared with control women at 22 and 26 weeks (ANOVA, P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively) (Table 4). Post-hoc analysis at 26 weeks showed significant differences at doses of 4 and 8 mC (P<0.001) Postpartum SNP responses were not significantly different between normal and preeclamptic women (Table 4). None of the women had clinically diagnosed PE at 26 weeks (mean gestation at onset, 34.9 weeks; range, 29 to 39 weeks).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During normal pregnancy, the augmented response to acetylcholine, but not to sodium nitroprusside, suggests enhanced production of endothelium-derived substances rather than a generalized increased responsiveness of the microvessels.22 Several mediators might be involved, such as nitric oxide, prostacyclin, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF).23,24 Our findings in the microcirculation are consistent with those seen in large vessels of normal pregnant women.1
In women with PE, however, our findings in the microcirculation are not consistent with those in large vessels. Flow-mediated dilatation is significantly reduced in women with established PE compared with responses in normal pregnant women.68 Brachial artery infusions of acetylcholine also produce diminished endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in established PE.25 Whether these changes are transient during PE or more permanent could not be determined from these studies as all were performed at varying single time points and no comparison was made with postpartum responses. Savvidou et al did find that changes in endothelial function predated the development of PE by 10 weeks.7 In this regard, our results support this finding but the way in which endothelial dysfunction is expressed during pregnancy differs between large and small vessels.
Enhanced microvascular responses to acetylcholine have been shown previously in women who have PE by Davis et al,9 but the time of onset of these changes could not be determined from their study. In contrast to our study, they did not find any differences in responses to sodium nitroprusside. The reason for this could be that their measurements were made using single point laser Doppler flowmetry as opposed to imaging over a larger area as we did, which gives a better representation of skin perfusion. They did, however, show a trend toward an increased response but conducted their study at a single time point only (between 34 and 36 weeks gestation) when the effects might not be as apparent. In keeping with this, we saw a smaller difference in SNP responses at 34 weeks compared with those at 22 and 26 weeks gestation in preeclamptic women.
Enhanced production of endothelium-derived substances cannot be solely responsible for the changes seen in women with PE because microvascular responses to both acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were significantly altered. It is likely, therefore, that the differences in microvascular responses between women with a normal pregnancy and those with PE result from changes at a level further down from the endothelium and are possibly related to a compensatory increase in the sensitivity to nitric oxide at the smooth muscle level.
A change in the sensitivity of the microvasculature to nitric oxide in PE is of primary importance and is not a consequence of raised blood pressure because enhanced responses to sodium nitroprusside were apparent at 22 weeks gestation, before there were any clinical signs of PE. These findings suggest that maternal alterations in the response to nitric oxide might be an important factor in the subsequent development of PE. It has been reported recently that a vasoactive circulating factor(s), capable of altering myometrial endothelial function, is present in plasma samples weeks or months before the diagnosis of preeclampsia.5 It is possible that one of the actions of this circulating factor(s) is to alter the endothelial production of nitric oxide and subsequently the actions of nitric oxide on smooth muscle.
Maternal abnormalities of endothelial function and nitric oxide responsiveness in women with PE might increase cardiovascular risk in later life.1012 However, we did not find any postpartum differences in microvascular responses between women with normal pregnancies and PE women. One reason for this discrepancy might be that we measured our post partum subjects after a relatively short period (6 weeks).
The precise role of nitric oxide in PE remains unclear. The vascular changes during normal pregnancy have been attributed, in part, to nitric oxide, although this is not a consistent finding. Forearm vasoconstrictor responses to nitric oxide inhibition have been shown to be reduced in normal pregnancy in 2 studies2,26 but not in the study by Bowyer et al25 The studies by Anumba et al2 and Bowyer et al25 both showed that the effect of nitric oxide inhibition is the same on the vessels of preeclamptic women as in normal pregnancy. Circulating levels of nitrite are reported to be decreased in patients with PE,27 supporting the concept that diminished nitric oxide synthesis contributes to the pathophysiology of PE. Other studies, however, indicate that in fact higher levels of nitric oxide are produced,2830 perhaps as a compensatory mechanism to offset the impaired placental perfusion in PE. Of interest is the recent study by Wang et al31 who reported that endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression is decreased in PE. This raises the question as to whether the studies showing increased production of nitric oxide reflect increased endothelial production or whether nitric oxide is produced from other sources. In the present study the increased sensitivity to sodium nitroprusside might result from a compensatory response of the microvessels to decreased expression of nitric oxide synthase.
The incidence of complications in our normal Doppler group was higher than previously reported. However, this study was not designed to assess the sensitivity or specificity of Doppler waveform analysis as a screening test; this has been addressed in previous studies and our experimental design may have contributed to the increased incidence. We used Doppler analyses as a method of identifying a cohort of women at risk for pregnancy complications to facilitate longitudinal plasma sampling. Although the presence of bilateral notching has been shown to adversely affect endothelial function,7,32 we did not find any differences in microvascular function between women with and without notches.
The resulting sample size of women with PE was relatively small (n=15), and therefore we must be cautious with generalization of our findings. Nevertheless, we feel that the resulting sample size is sufficient to give us a true reflection of the vascular changes that occur during PE. Ramsay et al used similar methodology to ours in 9 women with diabetes and 16 control subjects and found significant differences within each group when comparing microvascular responses during pregnancy with those in the postnatal period.33 Additionally, we have previously shown that significant differences in microvascular responses before and after intervention are measurable using a paired comparison in 16 subjects.34
Perspectives
We have shown that skin microvascular responses are enhanced in women in whom PE develops. This enhancement in vascular function is over and above that seen in normal pregnancy and possibly results from a compensatory response of the microvasculature to decreased nitric oxide production. Importantly, these changes within the microcirculation precede the onset of clinical disease by weeks or months. Early assessment of vascular function, in women at increased risk for PE, might help in the identification of potentially vulnerable patients, and enable therapeutic strategies to be targeted to this potentially dangerous condition.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 11, 2005; first decision July 28, 2005; accepted September 1, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Anumba DOC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Ford GA. Nitric oxide activity in the peripheral vasculature during normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy. Am J Physiol. 1999; 277: H848H854.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Gerretsen G, Huisjes HJ, Elema JD. Morphological changes of the spiral arteries in the placental bed in relation to pre-eclampsia and fetal growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981; 88: 876881.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, Rodgers GM, Hubel CA, McLaughlin MK. Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161: 200204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Myers J, Mires G, MacLeod M, Baker P. In preeclampsia, the circulating factors capable of altering in vitro endothelial function precede clinical disease. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 258263.
6. Yoshida A, Nakao S, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi H. Flow-mediated vasodilation and plasma fibronectin levels in preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 400404.
7. Savvidou MD, Hinorani AD, Tsikas D, Frölich JC, Vallance P, Nicolaides KH. Endothelial dysfunction and raised plasma concentrations of asymmetric dimethylarginine in pregnant women who subsequently develop preeclampsia. Lancet. 2003; 361: 15111517.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Takase B, Goto T, Hamabe A, Uehata A, Kuroda K, Satomura K, Ohsuza F, Kurita A. Flow-mediated dilation in brachial artery in the second half of pregnancy and prediction of preeclampsia. J Hum Hypertens. 2003; 17: 697704.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Davis KR, Ponnampalam J, Hayman R, Baker PN, Arulkumaran S, Donnelly R. Microvascular vasodilator response to acetylcholine is increased in women with pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 108: 610614.[CrossRef]
10. Chamber JC, Fusi L, Malik IS, Haskard DO, Swiet MD, Kooner JS. Association of maternal endothelial dysfunction with preeclampsia. J Am Med Assoc. 2001; 285: 16071612.
11. Ramsay JE, Stewart F, Greer IA, Sattar N. Microvascular dysfunction: a link between pre-eclampsia and maternal coronary heart disease. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 110: 10291031.
12. Agatisa PK, Ness RB, Roberts JM, Costantino JP, Kuller LH, McLaughlin MK. Impairment of endothelial function in women with a history of preeclampsia: an indicator of cardiovascular risk. Am J Physiol. 2004; 286: H1389H1393.
13. Mires GJ, Williams FL, Leslie J, Howie PW. Assessment of uterine arterial notching as a screening test for adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179: 13171323.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Roberts JM, Pearson G, Cutler J, Lindheimer M. Summary of the NHLBI Working Group on research in hypertension during pregnancy. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 437445.
15. http://www.gestation.net/birthweight_centiles/centile_online.htm.
16. Spence VA, Khan F, Belch JJF. Enhanced sensitivity of the peripheral cholinergic vascular response in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Am J Med. 2000; 108: 736739.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Khan F, Newton DJ, Smyth EC, Belch JJF. The influence of vehicle resistance on transdermal iontophoretic delivery of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2004; 97: 883887.
18. Martin H, Hu J, Gennser G, Norman M. Impaired endothelial function and increased carotid stiffness in 9-year-old children with low birthweight. Circulation. 2000; 102: 27392744.
19. Kubli S, Waeber B, Dalle-Ave A, Feihl F. Reproducibility of laser Doppler imaging of skin blood flow as a tool to assess endothelial function. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000; 36: 640648.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Newton DJ, Khan F, Belch JJF. Assessment of microvascular endothelial function in human skin. Clin Sci. 2001; 101: 567572.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Hansell J, Henareh L, Agewall S, Norman M. Non-invasive assessment of endothelial functionrelation between vasodilatory responses in skin microcirculation and brachial artery. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004; 24: 317322.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. McCarthy AL, Taylor P, Graves J, Raju SK, Poston L. Endothelium-dependent relaxation of human resistance arteries in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 13091315.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Coats P, Johnston F, MacDonald J, McMurray JJ, Hillier C. Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factorIdentification and mechanisms of action in human subcutaneous resistance arteries. Circulation. 2001; 103: 17021708.
24. Gerber RT, Anwar MA, and Poston L. Enhanced acetylcholine-induced relaxation in small mesenteric arteries from pregnant rats: an important role for endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). Br J Pharmacol. 1998; 125: 455460.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Bowyer L, Brown MA, Jones M. Forearm blood flow in pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 110: 383391.
26. Williams DJ, Vallance PJ, Neild GH, Spencer JA, Imms FJ. Nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in human pregnancy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1997; 272: H748H752.
27. Seligman SP, Buyon JP, Clancy RM, Young BK, Abramson SB. The role of nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 944948.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Lyall F, Young A, Greer IA. Nitric oxide concentrations are increased in the fetoplacental circulation in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173: 714718.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Nishikawa S Miyamoto A, Yamamoto H, Oshika H, Kudo R. The relationship between serum nitrate and endothelin-1 concentrations in preeclampsia. Life Sci. 2000; 67: 14471454.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Rowe J, Campbell S, Gallery ED. Nitric oxide production by decidual endothelial cells is not reduced in preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2003; 22: 6375.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Wang Y, Gu Y, Zhang Y, Lewis DF. Evidence of endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia: decreased endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression is associated with increased cell permeability in endothelial cells from preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 817824.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Borszki J, Länne T, Stale H, Batra S, Mar
ál K. Altered vascular function in healthy normotensive pregnant women with bilateral uterine artery notches. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 109: 546552.
33. Ramsay JE, Simms RJ, Ferrell WR, Crawford L, Greer IA, Lumsden MA, Sattar N. Enhancement of endothelial function by pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 475479.
34. Khan F, Litchfield SJ, Stonebridge PA, Belch JJF. Lipid-lowering and skin vascular responses in patients with hypercholesterolemia and peripheral arterial obstructive disease. Vascular Med. 1999; 4: 233238.[CrossRef]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Wang, S. Rana, and S. A. Karumanchi Preeclampsia: The Role of Angiogenic Factors in Its Pathogenesis Physiology, June 1, 2009; 24(3): 147 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Euser and M. J. Cipolla Magnesium Sulfate for the Treatment of Eclampsia: A Brief Review Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1169 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. LaMarca, J. Gilbert, and J. P. Granger Recent Progress Toward the Understanding of the Pathophysiology of Hypertension During Preeclampsia Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 982 - 988. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Teran, C. Escudero, S. Vivero, G. Molina, and A. Calle NO in Early Pregnancy and Development of Preeclampsia Hypertension, April 1, 2006; 47(4): e17 - e17. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Carbillon Uterine Artery Doppler and Changes in Endothelial Function Before Clinical Disease in Preeclamptic Women Hypertension, April 1, 2006; 47(4): e16 - e16. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Blaauw, R. Graaff, M. G. van Pampus, J. J. van Doormaal, A. J. Smit, G. Rakhorst, J. G. Aarnoudse, F. Khan, J. J.F. Belch, M. MacLeod, et al. Changes in Endothelial Function Precede the Clinical Disease in Women in Whom Preeclampsia Develops * Response: Endothelial Function and Preeclampsia Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): e14 - e15. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Salas, G. Marshall, B. L. Gutierrez, and P. Rosso Time Course of Maternal Plasma Volume and Hormonal Changes in Women With Preeclampsia or Fetal Growth Restriction Hypertension, February 1, 2006; 47(2): 203 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |