Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2005;46:1347-1354
Published online before print November 14, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000193504.51489.cf
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/6/1347    most recent
01.HYP.0000193504.51489.cfv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D’Amore, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by D’Amore, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, W. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrowRelated Article

(Hypertension. 2005;46:1347.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

The Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Causes Constitutive Growth of Cardiomyocytes and Does Not Antagonize Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor–Mediated Hypertrophy

Angelo D’Amore; M. Jane Black; Walter G. Thomas

From the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology (A.D., M.J.B.), Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; and Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory (A.D., W.G.T.), Baker Heart Research Institute, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.

Correspondence to Dr Walter Thomas, Baker Heart Research Institute, PO Box 6492, St. Kilda Rd Central, Melbourne, 8008, Australia. E-mail walter.thomas{at}baker.edu.au


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Angiotensin II (Ang II) has important actions on the heart via type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2) receptors. The link between AT1 receptor activation and the hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes is accepted, whereas the contribution of the AT2 receptor, which reportedly antagonizes the AT1 receptor, is contentious. This ambiguity is primarily based on in vivo approaches, in which the direct effect of the AT2 receptor and its modulation of the AT1 receptor (at the level of the cardiomyocyte) are difficult to establish. In this study, we used adenoviruses encoding AT1 and AT2 to coexpress these receptors in isolated cardiomyocytes, allowing a direct examination of the consequence of varying AT1/AT2 stoichiometry on cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. In myocytes expressing only the AT1 receptor, Ang II stimulation promoted robust hypertrophy (increased protein:DNA ratio and phenotypic changes) via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Titration of the AT2 receptor against the AT1 receptor did not inhibit Ang II–mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Instead, basal and Ang II–mediated hypertrophy was increased in line with the amplified expression of the AT2 receptor, indicating a capacity for the AT2 receptor to enhance basal cardiomyocyte growth. Indeed, expression of the AT2 receptor alone resulted in hypertrophy; remarkably, this was unaffected by Ang II stimulation or the AT2 receptor–specific ligands PD123319 and CGP42112. Although previous studies have indicated that the AT2 receptor can antagonize MAPK activation via the AT1 receptor, we found no evidence for this in cardiomyocytes. Thus, the AT2 receptor promotes ligand-independent, constitutive cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and does not directly antagonize the AT1 receptor in this setting.


Key Words: angiotensin II • hypertrophy • myocytes • rats • receptors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a major independent risk factor for premature death.1 Extensive experimental and clinical evidence supports a role for the vasoactive hormone angiotensin II (Ang II) in the development of hypertension and the associated cardiomyocyte enlargement, which is a hallmark of LVH. Ang II binds with high affinity to type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2) Ang II receptors, which are 7-transmembrane spanning, G-protein–coupled receptors.2 AT1 receptors are well characterized and mediate the established actions of Ang II, including vasoconstriction, aldosterone and vasopressin release, renal sodium reabsorption, increased collagen deposition, cellular proliferation, and, importantly, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. The role of the AT2 receptor is less clear, but current theories favor a role in opposing the actions of the AT1 receptor.3–7 AT2 receptors are highly expressed in the fetus; however, after birth, the AT2 receptor expression decreases to low levels.2 In normal, adult human and rat hearts, AT1 and AT2 receptors are expressed,8–10 and they have been shown to be upregulated during cardiovascular pathologies.8,9 The specific signaling pathways activated via the AT2 receptor remain poorly resolved, although AT2 receptors reportedly inhibit AT1 receptor signaling pathways, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), by activating specific tyrosine or serine/threonine phosphatases.6,11,12 More recent evidence suggests functional heterodimerization between the AT1 and AT2 receptors, in which the AT2 receptor antagonizes the actions of the AT1 receptor.13

The widely accepted notion that the AT2 receptor simply counteracts the vasoactive roles of the AT1 receptor is being increasingly challenged.14,15 For example, AT2 receptors have been shown to decrease7,16 or not affect blood pressure and17 to inhibit,18–20 increase,21,22 and not affect23 collagen deposition. They have been shown to be involved in fetal development24 and cause cellular differentiation.25,26 AT2 receptors have been reported to inhibit7,18,27 or stimulate28 vascular growth and angiogenesis, inhibit20,26,27,29 and not affect23 cellular proliferation, and cause6,30,31 or not affect32 apoptosis. Most important, AT2 receptors have been shown to lead to either stimulation of,21,22,33 inhibition of,34 or not affect18,19,32 cardiac hypertrophy. At least part of this inconsistency relates to the experimental approaches used. For example, most of the studies examining the role of the AT2 receptor in cardiac hypertrophy have been conducted in vivo using wild-type and AT2 receptor transgenic or knockout animals. Although powerful, such studies can be problematic because of strain differences and complicated by other cellular, circulating, and paracrine factors. Studies aimed at investigating the direct effects of Ang II on cultured cardiomyocytes have also yielded ambiguous results, primarily because of low and variable expression of AT1 and AT2 receptors and inconsistent hypertrophy in such models. We have recently shown that Ang II–mediated hypertrophy can be reproducibly demonstrated in cultured cardiomyocytes infected with recombinant AT1 receptors.35

To directly investigate the effect of activating the AT2 receptor on cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, we developed an adenovirus expressing the AT2 receptor, which has allowed us to tightly control the ratio of AT1:AT2 receptor expression in these cells. We report that the AT2 receptor causes constitutive cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, which is independent of Ang II and in contrast to some prevailing theories, and the AT2 receptor does not antagonize the hypertrophic actions and signals of the AT1 receptor.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Generation of AdNHA-AT1 and AdNHA-AT2
A plasmid containing the rat AT2 receptor gene (obtained from Dr T.J. Murphy, Emory University School of Medicine) was subcloned into the mammalian expression vector pRc/CMV at HindIII/XbaI (pRc/CMV-AT2). A hemagglutinin antigen (HA) epitope tag was introduced at the N terminus (pRc/CMV-NHA-AT2) using the ExSite Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The recombinant AT2 receptor adenovirus (AdNHA-AT2) was produced using the method described by He et al.36 The coding region of the NHA-AT2 was subcloned into the pAdTrack-CMV shuttle vector, obtained from Dr B. Vogelstein36 (Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, Md), using HindIII and XbaI linkers to yield pAdTrackNHA-AT2. pAdTrackNHA-AT2 underwent bacterial homologous recombination with pAdEasy-1, generating recombinant adenoviruses (AdNHA-AT2). AdNHA-AT2 and AdNHA-AT1 viral stock titers used were 0.37x109 plaque forming units (PFU)/µL and 0.22x109 PFU/µL, respectively (the AT1 receptor adenovirus [AdNHA-AT1] has been reported previously35).

Cell Culture
Cardiomyocytes isolated from 1-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat ventricles were plated at high density in 12-well plates at 0.475x106 cells per well (1250 cells/mm2; for radio-labeled binding, Western blots, protein, and DNA assays) or at low density at 0.125x106 cells per well (330 cells/mm2; for phalloidin staining) as described previously.37 Cardiomyocytes plated at high density were grown in modified Eagle’s medium with 10% bovine calf serum for 24 hours, then in defined, serum-free media with KCl (50 mmol/L) to arrest spontaneous beating.37 Animals, supplied by the Precinct Animal Centre (Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct, Prahran, Melbourne, Australia), were handled in accordance with the Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.

Adenoviral Infection of Cardiomyocytes
After 24-hour incubation in defined serum-free media, cardiomyocytes were infected with 3 levels of AdNHA-AT1, termed L_ (low; multiplicity of infection (MOI)=8; 4x106 PFU), M_ (medium; MOI=23; 11x106 PFU), and H_ (high; MOI=70; 33x106 PFU), or with 3 amounts of AdNHA-AT2, L_ (MOI=31; 15x106 PFU), M_ (MOI=93; 44x106 PFU), and H_ (MOI=280; 133x106 PFU). M_AdNHA-AT1 and M_AdNHA-AT2 show similar amounts of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence (data not shown), indicating similar amounts of viral infectivity.

Characterization of AdNHA-AT2
The AT1 and AT2 receptors were detected, quantified, and characterized in AdNHA-AT1–infected and AdNHA-AT2–infected cardiomyocytes 48 hours after infection via equilibrium competition binding assays.35 A [125I]-Ang II tracer was displaced with Ang II, the AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan (CV-11974; Astra Hässle), the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 (Sigma), and the AT2 receptor peptide agonist38,39 CGP42112A (Bachem). Receptor concentrations were calculated according to Swillens.40 AT1 and AT2 receptors were immunoprecipitated from cell extracts35 of adenoviral-infected cardiomyocytes. The immunoprecipitates were Western blotted using monoclonal anti-HA antibodies (Roche Diagnostics; 1:1000) and chemiluminescence (Pierce).

Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy
Forty-eight hours after adenoviral infection, cardiomyocytes were stimulated with Ang II (0.1 µmol/L), candesartan (1 µmol/L), PD123319 (1 µmol/L), CGP42112A (0.1 µmol/L), or the MAPK inhibitor PD98059 (Sigma; 20 µmol/L). Blockers were administered 30 minutes before Ang II stimulation, when in combination. Seventy-two hours after stimulation, cardiomyocytes were harvested, and hypertrophy, defined as increased protein:DNA ratio, was determined as described previously.35

Phalloidin Staining
Low-density cardiomyocytes were stained with tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate (TRITC)–labeled phalloidin (Sigma) as described previously.35,37 This allows a visualization of sarcomeric reorganization, a feature of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, in these cells.

ERK1/2 Activity
ERK1/2 activation and expression were examined using Western blots probed with monoclonal phospho-p44/42 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-ERK1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) as described previously.35,37

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SEM. For comparisons between 2 groups, a Student t test was used. For all multigroup comparisons, data were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test. Significance was accepted at P<0.05. Grouped data are from 4 separate experiments, each of which involved triplicate wells assayed in duplicate.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Characterization of AdNHA-AT2
Binding of [125I]-Ang II to AT1 receptors expressed on cardiomyocytes using the adenovirus was displaced with high affinity by Ang II and the AT1 receptor specific ligand candesartan but not the AT2 receptor specific ligands PD123319 and CGP42112A (Figure 1A). [125I]-Ang II binding to AT2 receptors expressed on cardiomyocytes was displaced with Ang II, PD123319, and CGP42112A but not candesartan, confirming AT2 receptor adenoviral expression (Figure 1B).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Characterization of AT1 and AT2 receptor adenoviruses. Competition binding for the AT1 receptor (A) and the AT2 receptor (B) using [125I]-Ang II displaced with Ang II (•), candesartan ({circ}), PD123319 ({triangleup}), or CGP42112 ({square}). C, Cardiomyocytes were infected with increasing amounts of AdNHA-AT2, and receptor expression, represented as fmol receptor/mg protein, was determined by radio-ligand binding assay. D, Western blot of immunoprecipitated AT1 and AT2 receptors resolved nonglycosylated and glycosylated forms.

AT2 receptor expression was titrated with different amounts of AdNHA-AT2, designated low (L_), medium (M_), and high (H_; Figure 1C). Infection with M_AdNHA-AT2 resulted in &400-fmol receptor/mg protein (Figure 1C) similar to that of M_AdNHA-AT1–infected cells, which produced &500-fmol receptor/mg protein.35

Figure 1D shows expression of the AT1 receptor compared with the titrated AT2 receptor in cardiomyocytes. Receptors were immunoprecipitated and Western blotted for the N-terminal HA epitope. AdNHA-AT2–infected cardiomyocytes showed increased AT2 receptor expression with increased viral titer (Figure 1D); the level of receptor protein generated by M_AdNHA-AT2 was similar to that produced by M_AdNHA-AT1, confirming the radioligand binding data.

Characterization of Uninfected Cardiomyocytes
In uninfected neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, radioligand binding of [125I]-Ang II showed very low to undetectable levels of endogenous AT1 and AT2 receptors (data not shown). These myocytes failed to hypertrophy after Ang II stimulation (Figure 2), as measured by protein content normalized to cellular DNA. We previously demonstrated that these cells are capable of &30% hypertrophy by activation of endogenous {alpha}1-adrenergic receptors and that the lack of Ang II–induced hypertrophy is attributable to low AT1 receptor expression in these highly purified cultures.35 Low levels of endogenous Ang II receptors in neonatal cardiomyocytes and the absence of Ang II–mediated hypertrophy makes this model ideal for introducing AT1 and AT2 receptors and examining their interactions in a controlled manner.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Uninfected neonatal cardiomyocytes are unresponsive to Ang II or AT1/AT2 agonists/antagonists. Stimulation of uninfected cardiomyocytes with Ang II did not promote hypertrophy and addition of candesartan, PD123319, or CGP42112 had no effect. Note that hypertrophy is represented as percentage differences from the control group.

Hypertrophic Effects of AT1 Receptors
As observed previously,35 increasing the expression of AT1 receptors on cardiomyocytes promoted robust Ang II–stimulated hypertrophy (Figure 3A). However, increasing the expression of the AT1 receptor on cardiomyocytes does not increase basal (in the absence of Ang II) cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. The Ang II–stimulated hypertrophy observed in M_AdNHA-AT1–infected cardiomyocytes (125±3%; where uninfected, unstimulated control is 100%) was reversed by candesartan treatment but unaffected by the AT2 receptor ligands (Figure 3B). The phenotypic changes that occur during Ang II–induced hypertrophy of M_AdNHA-AT1–infected cardiomyocytes can be clearly seen by examination of GFP fluorescence (resulting from virus infection) and phalloidin staining (Figure 3C).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Increasing amounts of AT1 receptors results in an increasing hypertrophic response to Ang II. A, Ang II–mediated hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes infected with increasing amounts of AdNHA-AT1 receptors (low [L], medium [M], and high [H]). B, Effect on Ang II–induced hypertrophy (black bar) by candesartan (checkered bar), PD123319 (crosshatched), or CGP42112 (vertical stripes) treatments. C, Phenotypic changes of cardiomyocytes visualized via GFP expression after M_AdNHA-AT1 infection (left panels) and via TRITC-labeled phalloidin staining (right panels). Bar=100 µm. *P<0.01 compared with the unstimulated counterpart; **P<0.0001 compared with the unstimulated counterpart; {dagger}P<0.01 compared with uninfected cardiomyocytes with Ang II stimulation; {dagger}{dagger}P<0.001 compared with uninfected cardiomyocytes with Ang II stimulation; {ddagger}P<0.005 compared with Ang II stimulated.

Hypertrophic Effects of AT2 Receptors
In contrast to the AT1 receptor, increasing the expression of the AT2 receptor on cardiomyocytes led to a concomitant increase in basal hypertrophy (Figure 4A), which was unaffected by treatment with any of the Ang II receptor ligands (Ang II, PD123319, CGP42112A, or candesartan; Figure 4B). The MAPK inhibitor PD98059 was unable to inhibit this constitutive growth (Figure 4B), although it abrogates Ang II–mediated growth via the AT1 receptor.35 H_AdNHA-AT2–infected cardiomyocytes show a hypertrophic phenotype, in the absence of Ang II stimulation, when examining GFP labeling and phalloidin staining (Figure 4C).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Increased AT2 receptor expression results in Ang II–independent hypertrophy. A, Unstimulated (white bars) or Ang II–stimulated (black bars) cardiomyocytes infected with increasing amounts of AdNHA-AT2 receptors (low [L], medium [M], and high [H]). B, AT2 receptor-induced constitutive hypertrophy was unaffected by cotreatment with AT1 and AT2 receptor ligands or an inhibitor of ERK1/2 signaling. C, H_AdNHA-AT2 infected cardiomyocytes (GFP-labeled) show a hypertrophic phenotype in the absence of Ang II stimulation (right panel; similar to that seen in Figure 3C). Similarly, TRITC-labeled phalloidin staining (middle panel) shows sarcomeric reorganization not observed in the control uninfected, unstimulated cardiomyocytes (left panel). Bar=100µm. *P<0.01 compared with uninfected, unstimulated control; **P<0.001 compared with uninfected, unstimulated control; {dagger}P<0.05 compared with uninfected cardiomyocytes with Ang II stimulation; {dagger}{dagger}P<0.01 compared with uninfected cardiomyocytes with Ang II stimulation.

To confirm that the AT2 constitutive growth did not result from a nonspecific adenoviral effect, we infected cells with a control backbone adenovirus (AdGO; MOI=17; 8x106 PFU, which matched the level of GFP fluorescence of H_AdNHA-AT2) and observed no change in basal hypertrophy compared with the uninfected control (data not shown).

Hypertrophic Effects of Coexpressing the AT1 and AT2 Receptors
We next investigated whether coexpression of the AT2 receptor could modify the hypertrophic response of AT1 receptor activation. As shown in Figure 5, increasing AT2 receptor expression did not inhibit Ang II–mediated hypertrophy through the AT1 receptor. AT2 receptor–mediated enhanced basal hypertrophy was maintained and was additive to that of the AT1 receptor, indicating that these receptors are impinging on separate pathways. The AT1 receptor component was inhibited by candesartan. Treatment with the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 did not reverse the Ang II hypertrophic response, and stimulation of the AT2 receptors with the agonist CGP42112A before Ang II stimulation of the AT1 receptors also did not inhibit hypertrophy (Figure 5B).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. AT2 receptor–mediated hypertrophy is additive to that of the AT1 receptor. A, Ang II–mediated hypertrophy in cardiomyocytes infected with medium (M_) amounts of AdNHA-AT1 and titrated amounts of AT2 receptors (low [L], medium [M], and high [H]) is reduced to basal levels with candesartan (checkered bars). B, Cardiomyocytes infected with medium (M_) amounts of AdNHA-AT1 and medium (M_) amounts of AdNHA-AT2 stimulated with Ang II (black bar), CGP42112 (horizontal stripes), or Ang II with CGP42112 (vertical stripes), PD123319 (crosshatched bar), or candesartan (checkered bar). *P<0.05 compared with the unstimulated counterpart; **P<0.005 compared with the unstimulated counterpart; ***P<0.0001 compared with the unstimulated counterpart; {ddagger}P<0.05 compared with Ang II– stimulated counterpart; {ddagger}{ddagger}P<0.005 compared with the Ang II– stimulated counterpart.

Effect of the AT1 and AT2 Receptors on MAPK Activity
Previous studies have indicated that the AT2 receptor may antagonize the capacity of AT1 receptors to activate ERK1/2 MAPK.6 AT1 receptor–mediated ERK1/2 activation after Ang II stimulation was unaffected by coexpression of equal or greater amounts of AT2 receptor (Figure 6).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. AT1-mediated ERK1/2 activity is not altered by AT2 receptor coexpression. ERK1/2 activation and expression were examined using Western blots probed with monoclonal phospho-p44/42 antibody and anti-ERK1 antibody. Ang II stimulation of cardiomyocytes expressing only AT1 receptors showed a robust increase in MAPK activity. Coexpression of AT2 receptors in cells not expressing or expressing adenovirus-directed AT1 receptors had no effect on basal or Ang II–stimulated ERK1/2 activation.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The contribution (either positive or negative) of the AT2 receptor to cardiac hypertrophy is equivocal.5,18,21,22,33,34,41 In the present study, we used cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes (which express low to undetectable levels of Ang II receptors) and recombinant adenoviruses, encoding the AT1 and AT2 receptors, to examine the involvement of the AT2 receptor in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. The main advantage of our approach is that the degree and stoichiometry of AT1 and AT2 receptor expression can be varied, and it is possible to directly examine the hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes in isolation. Thus, we were able to express different ratios and amounts of AT1 and AT2 receptors and then determine the effect on cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in response to Ang II stimulation and in the presence and absence of AT1 and AT2 selective ligands. We show that increasing the AT2 receptor expression in cardiomyocytes leads to a ligand-independent increase in basal hypertrophy. Importantly, we also clearly document that Ang II–stimulated AT1 receptor–mediated hypertrophy of isolated cardiomyocytes is unaffected by coexpression of the AT2 receptor. Thus, in cardiomyocytes, the AT2 receptor causes constitutive growth and does not oppose the actions of the AT1 receptor.

A variety of elegant in vivo experimental approaches (including knockout, transgenic, and lentiviral AT2 receptor expression) have attempted to delineate the role of the AT2 receptor in cardiac hypertrophy.5,18,21,22,33,34,41 In some studies, abolition17 or cardiac-specific overexpression5 of the AT2 receptor failed to implicate this receptor in the modulation of LVH after Ang II infusion or aortic banding.18,19,32 In contrast, in another AT2 receptor knockout model (albeit in a different strain),16 LVH was prevented after either Ang II infusion21 or aortic constriction22 compared with wild-type counterparts. This indicates the apparent importance of the AT2 receptor in the development of LVH. Moreover, Yan et al33 reported that ventricular-specific AT2 receptor overexpression (using the myosin light chain promoter) leads to an increase in LVH in the absence of any external stimulus. Finally, delivery of AT2 receptors to a subpopulation of cardiomyocytes and presumably other cells (because a cardiac-specific promoter was not used) using a bolus injection of an AT2 receptor–expressing lentivirus34 reportedly prevented the Ang II–dependent development of LVH that occurs in spontaneously hypertensive rats.34 So despite much work, a coherent understanding of the role of the AT2 receptor in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy has remained elusive, primarily because of the inherent complexity and compensatory mechanisms of in vivo/transgenic approaches or the lack of specificity afforded by a bolus viral injection in the heart. Moreover, most existing data on the AT2 receptor (and its interpretation) hinge on the veracity of PD123319 antagonism. Although PD123319 is undoubtedly a selective inhibitor of Ang II binding to the AT2 binding site, we would argue, based on our data and that of some others,13,31 that PD123319 cannot modulate all functions ascribed to this receptor. Most would agree that signaling from the AT2 receptor has been difficult to unambiguously establish, and hence the term "antagonist" should be used with caution.

Our data, using adenoviral-directed AT2 receptor expression, indicate a direct, prohypertrophic action for the AT2 receptor on cardiomyocytes. Interestingly, none of the AT2 receptor ligands examined (Ang II, PD123319, and CGP42112) could block or facilitate this effect, indicating that this receptor is constitutively active and that the presence of the AT2 receptor alone is sufficient to drive this process. Although we cannot completely rule out that our results are a nuance of receptor overexpression, such an idea (ie, constitutive activity of the AT2 receptor) has precedence.31,42–45 For example, the AT2 receptor displays ligand pharmacology consistent with it residing in a constant, active conformation.43 This receptor induces apoptosis in the absence of Ang II stimulation, and the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 does not modulate this effect.31 In addition, Jin et al44 showed that overexpression of the AT2 receptor downregulates AT1 receptor expression in vascular smooth muscle cells, with and without Ang II stimulation. In contrast to the AT1 receptor, in which signal transduction pathways are well documented, the extent and type of intracellular signals that emanate from the AT2 receptor have been difficult to define.15,46,47 Thus, the molecular mechanisms and signals that generate constitutive activity in the AT2 receptor remain elusive. Recently, it was suggested that in Chinese hamster ovary cells, homo-oligomerization of AT2 receptors leads to constitutive cell signaling.45 Given this emerging body of evidence, it would seem appropriate to consider reinterpreting some existing data based on consideration of a constitutive rather than ligand-activated AT2 receptor.

Activation of ERK1/2 MAPKs has been strongly associated with hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes,35 and there is evidence that the AT2 receptor impinges on ERK1/2 activation. Although AT2 receptors have been shown to induce MAPK activity in neuronal NG108–15 cells,48 most studies have pointed to an inhibitory action of the AT2 receptor on ERK1/2 MAPK and growth, primarily via activation of the SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase (SHP-1), MAPK phosphatase-1, and serine/threonine phosphatase 2A pathways.4,6,11,12,29,49 Interestingly, Feng et al49 could provide no evidence to support a constitutive activation of SHP-1 by the AT2 receptor; instead, SHP-1 associated with the "inactive" AT2 receptor and was released on Ang II stimulation. In cardiac fibroblasts, the AT2 receptor inhibited protein tyrosine phosphatases but had no effect on MAPK ERK1/2 activity.23 Our results show that AT2 receptors alone do not alter ERK1/2 activity, and ERK inhibition did not alter AT2 receptor constitutive growth. Thus, the mechanism of the constitutive cardiomyocyte growth remains to be determined, but it is clearly not via the MAPK pathway. Moreover, the AT2 receptor did not inhibit AT1 receptor–induced ERK1/2 activation, supporting our observation that AT2 coexpression did not affect AT1-mediated hypertrophy. A potential prohypertrophic pathway of the AT2 receptor has been suggested to involve this receptor binding to the promyelocytic zinc finger protein, which is then translocated to the nucleus and activates the p85{alpha} phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase gene leading to protein synthesis.50

The major outcome of our study is that we can provide no evidence to support the widely stated view that the AT2 receptor opposes the actions of the AT1 receptor. AT1 receptor–mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy was unaffected by coexpressing increasing levels of the AT2 receptor. This was an unexpected finding because there is significant literature suggesting that the AT2 receptor opposes the growth actions of the AT1 receptor, such as antiproliferation in vascular smooth muscle cells,4 endothelial cells,27 fibroblasts,20,29 and neuronal cells.26 Indeed, a recent report13 (that our data call into question) proposed that the AT2 receptor can physically associate as a heterodimer with the AT1 receptor and directly antagonize its actions. Although overexpression of the AT2 receptor using lentivirus injection into the heart was also reported to inhibit/delay Ang II/AT1–dependent cardiac hypertrophy,34,41 this likely reflects nonmyocyte actions because expression of the AT2 receptor was not driven by a cardiomyocyte-specific promoter. However, our results are in agreement with transgenic studies in which Ang II–mediated cardiac hypertrophy, via the AT1 receptor, was unaffected by cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of the AT2 receptor.19,32

In summary, the ambiguous role of the AT2 receptor in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy relates to conflicting interpretations of data from a variety of in vivo and in vitro studies. In this study, we examined the direct role of the AT2 receptor in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy independently of in vivo complications. Using an AT2 receptor expressing adenovirus to infect cardiomyocytes, we report that the AT2 receptor causes constitutive cardiomyocyte hypertrophy via an ERK1/2 MAPK–independent pathway. Finally, our data refute the idea that the AT2 receptor antagonizes the AT1 receptor in the setting of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy or ERK1/2 MAPK activation.

Perspectives
The enigmatic nature of the AT2 receptor has complicated a detailed appreciation of its contribution to cardiovascular regulation and, specifically, cardiac hypertrophy. Our data call into question the strongly held view that the AT2 receptor opposes the actions of the AT1 receptor, either by inhibiting AT1-mediated ERK1/2 activation or via direct antagonism mediated by heterodimerization between the 2 receptors. Instead, we favor a model in which both receptors independently impinge on cardiomyocyte growth. The next major challenge in this area will be to unambiguously establish the type and extent of intracellular signals emanating from the AT2 receptor, particularly those that underlie its capacity to promote constitutive cardiomyocyte growth.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (grant 225123 to W.G.T.) supported this work. We thank Thao Pham for help with developing the AT2 receptor adenovirus, Anna Jenkins for culturing neonatal cardiomyocytes, and Hongwei Qian for his expertise and advice. A Monash graduate scholarship supports A.D.

Received July 21, 2005; first decision August 11, 2005; accepted September 6, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322: 1561–1566.[Abstract]

2. de Gasparo M, Catt KJ, Inagami T, Wright JW, Unger T. International union of pharmacology. XXIII. The angiotensin II receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2000; 52: 415–472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Carey RM. Cardiovascular and renal regulation by the angiotensin type 2 receptor. The AT2 receptor comes of age. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 840–488.[Free Full Text]

4. Nakajima M, Hutchinson HG, Fujinaga M, Hayashida W, Morishita R, Zhang L, Horiuchi M, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. The angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor antagonizes the growth effects of the AT1 receptor: gain-of-function study using gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 10663–10667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Masaki H, Kurihara T, Yamaki A, Inomata N, Nozawa Y, Mori Y, Murasawa S, Kizima K, Maruyama K, Horiuchi M, Dzau VJ, Takahashi H, Iwasaka T, Inada M, Matsubara H. Cardiac-specific overexpression of angiotensin II AT2 receptor causes attenuated response to AT1 receptor-mediated pressor and chronotropic effects. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 527–535.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Yamada T, Akishita M, Pollman MJ, Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ, Horiuchi M Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis and antagonizes angiotensin II type 1 receptor action: an in vitro gene transfer study. Life Sci. 1998; 63: PL289–PL295.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Munzenmaier DH, Greene AS. Opposing actions of angiotensin II on microvascular growth and arterial blood pressure. Hypertension. 1996; 27: 760–765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Wharton J, Morgan K, Rutherford RA, Catravas JD, Chester A, Whitehead BF, De Leval MR, Yacoub MH, Polak JM. Differential distribution of angiotensin AT2 receptors in the normal and failing human heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998; 284: 323–336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Lopez JJ, Lorell BH, Ingelfinger JR, Weinberg EO, Schunkert H, Diamant D, Tang SS. Distribution and function of cardiac angiotensin AT1- and AT2-receptor subtypes in hypertrophied rat hearts. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: H844–H852.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Sechi LA, Griffin CA, Grady EF, Kalinyak JE, Schambelan M. Characterization of angiotensin II receptor subtypes in rat heart. Circ Res. 1992; 71: 1482–1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Huang XC, Richards EM, Sumners C. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in rat brain neuronal cultures are activated by angiotensin II type 1 receptors and inhibited by angiotensin II type 2 receptors. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 15635–15641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Bedecs K, Elbaz N, Sutren M, Masson M, Susini C, Strosberg AD, Nahmias C. Angiotensin II type 2 receptors mediate inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and functional activation of SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase. Biochem J. 1997; 325: 449–454.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. AbdAlla S, Lother H, Abdel-tawab AM, Quitterer U. The angiotensin II AT2 receptor is an AT1 receptor antagonist. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 39721–39726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Booz GW. Cardiac angiotensin AT2 receptor. What exactly does it do? Hypertension. 2004; 43: 1162–1163.[Free Full Text]

15. Inagami T, Senbonmatsu T. Dual effects of angiotensin II type 2 receptor on cardiovascular hypertrophy. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2001; 11: 324–328.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Ichiki T, Labosky PA, Shiota C, Okuyama S, Imagawa Y, Fogo A, Niimura F, Ichikawa I, Hogan BL, Inagami T. Effects on blood pressure and exploratory behaviour of mice lacking angiotensin II type-2 receptor. Nature. 1995; 377: 748–750.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Hein L, Barsh GS, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ, Kobilka BK. Behavioural and cardiovascular effects of disrupting the angiotensin II type-2 receptor in mice. Nature. 1995; 377: 744–747.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Akishita M, Iwai M, Wu L, Zhang L, Ouchi Y, Dzau VJ, Horiuchi M. Inhibitory effect of angiotensin II type 2 receptor on coronary arterial remodeling after aortic banding in mice. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1684–1689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Kurisu S, Ozono R, Oshima T, Kambe M, Ishida T, Sugino H, Matsuura H, Chayama K, Teranishi Y, Iba O, Amano K, Matsubara H. Cardiac angiotensin II type 2 receptor activates the kinin/NO system and inhibits fibrosis. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 99–107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Ohkubo N, Matsubara H, Nozawa Y, Mori Y, Murasawa S, Kijima K, Maruyama K, Masaki H, Tsutumi Y, Shibazaki Y, Iwasaka T, Inada M. Angiotensin type 2 receptors are reexpressed by cardiac fibroblasts from failing myopathic hamster hearts and inhibit cell growth and fibrillar collagen metabolism. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3954–3962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Ichihara S, Senbonmatsu T, Price E, Jr., Ichiki T, Gaffney FA, Inagami T. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor is essential for left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis in chronic angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Circulation. 2001; 104: 346–351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Senbonmatsu T, Ichihara S, Price E, Jr., Gaffney FA, Inagami T. Evidence for angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated cardiac myocyte enlargement during in vivo pressure overload. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: R25–R29.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Warnecke C, Kaup D, Marienfeld U, Poller W, Yankah C, Grafe M, Fleck E, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Adenovirus-mediated overexpression and stimulation of the human angiotensin II type 2 receptor in porcine cardiac fibroblasts does not modulate proliferation, collagen I mRNA expression and ERK1/ERK2 activity, but inhibits protein tyrosine phosphatases. J Mol Med. 2001; 79: 510–521.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Grady EF, Sechi LA, Griffin CA, Schambelan M, Kalinyak JE. Expression of AT2 receptors in the developing rat fetus. J Clin Invest. 1991; 88: 921–933.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Yamada H, Akishita M, Ito M, Tamura K, Daviet L, Lehtonen JY, Dzau VJ, Horiuchi M. AT2 receptor and vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in vascular development. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 1414–1419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Meffert S, Stoll M, Steckelings UM, Bottari SP, Unger T. The angiotensin II AT2 receptor inhibits proliferation and promotes differentiation in PC12W cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1996; 122: 59–67.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Stoll M, Steckelings UM, Paul M, Bottari SP, Metzger R, Unger T. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95: 651–657.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Walther T, Menrad A, Orzechowski HD, Siemeister G, Paul M, Schirner M. Differential regulation of in vivo angiogenesis by angiotensin II receptors. FASEB J. 2003; 17: 2061–2067.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Tsuzuki S, Matoba T, Eguchi S, Inagami T. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor inhibits cell proliferation and activates tyrosine phosphatase. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 916–918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Yamada T, Horiuchi M, Dzau VJ. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates programmed cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 156–160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Miura S, Karnik SS. Ligand-independent signals from angiotensin II type 2 receptor induce apoptosis. EMBO J. 2000; 19: 4026–4035.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Sugino H, Ozono R, Kurisu S, Matsuura H, Ishida M, Oshima T, Kambe M, Teranishi Y, Masaki H, Matsubara H. Apoptosis is not increased in myocardium overexpressing type 2 angiotensin II receptor in transgenic mice. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1394–1398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Yan X, Price RL, Nakayama M, Ito K, Schuldt AJ, Manning WJ, Sanbe A, Borg TK, Robbins J, Lorell BH. Ventricular-specific expression of angiotensin II type 2 receptors causes dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure in transgenic mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 285: H2179–H2187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Metcalfe BL, Huentelman MJ, Parilak LD, Taylor DG, Katovich MJ, Knot HJ, Sumners C, Raizada MK. Prevention of cardiac hypertrophy by angiotensin II type-2 receptor gene transfer. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 1233–1238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Thomas WG, Brandenburger Y, Autelitano DJ, Pham T, Qian H, Hannan RD. Adenoviral-directed expression of the type 1A angiotensin receptor promotes cardiomyocyte hypertrophy via transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 135–142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. He TC, Zhou S, da Costa LT, Yu J, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 2509–2514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Onan D, Pipolo L, Yang E, Hannan RD, Thomas WG. Urotensin II promotes hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes via mitogen-activated protein kinases. Mol Endocrinol. 2004; 18: 2344–2354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Macari D, Whitebread S, Cumin F, De Gasparo M, Levens N. Renal actions of the angiotensin AT2 receptor ligands CGP 42112 and PD 123319 after blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994; 259: 27–36.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Macari D, Bottari S, Whitebread S, De Gasparo M, Levens N. Renal actions of the selective angiotensin AT2 receptor ligands CGP 42112B and PD 123319 in the sodium-depleted rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993; 249: 85–93.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Swillens S. How to estimate the total receptor concentration when the specific radioactivity of the ligand is unknown. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992; 13: 430–434.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Falcon BL, Stewart JM, Bourassa E, Katovich MJ, Walter G, Speth RC, Sumners C, Raizada MK. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor gene transfer elicits cardioprotective effects in an angiotensin II infusion rat model of hypertension. Physiol Genomics. 2004; 19: 255–261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Falcon BL, Veerasingham SJ, Sumners C, Raizada MK. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated gene expression profiling in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 692–697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Miura S, Karnik SS. Angiotensin II type 1 and type 2 receptors bind angiotensin II through different types. J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 397–404.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Jin XQ, Fukuda N, Su JZ, Lai YM, Suzuki R, Tahira Y, Takagi H, Ikeda Y, Kanmatsuse K, Miyazaki H. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor gene transfer downregulates angiotensin II type 1a receptor in vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 1021–1027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Miura S, Karnik SS, Saku K. Constitutively active homo-oligomeric angiotensin II type 2 receptor induces cell signalling independent of receptor conformation and ligand stimulation. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 18237–18244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Stoll M, Unger T. Angiotensin and its AT2 receptor: new insights into an old system. Regul Pept. 2001; 99: 175–182.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Thomas WG, Mendelsohn FA. Angiotensin receptors: form and function and distribution. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2003; 35: 774–779.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Gendron L, Laflamme L, Rivard N, Asselin C, Payet MD, Gallo-Payet N. Signals from the AT2 (angiotensin type 2) receptor of angiotensin II inhibit p21ras and activate MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) to induce morphological neuronal differentiation in NG108–15 cells. Mol Endocrinol. 1999; 13: 1615–1626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Feng YH, Sun Y, Douglas JG. Gbeta gamma-independent constitutive association of Galpha s with SHP-1 and angiotensin II receptor AT2 is essential in AT2-mediated ITIM-independent activation of SHP-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 12049–12054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Senbonmatsu T, Saito T, Landon EJ, Watanabe O, Price E Jr, Roberts RL, Imboden H, Fitzgerald TG, Gaffney FA, Inagami T. A novel angiotensin II type 2 receptor signalling pathway: possible role in cardiac hypertrophy. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 6471–6482.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Related Article:

The Continuing Saga of the AT2 Receptor: A Case of the Good, the Bad, and the Innocuous
Timothy L. Reudelhuber
Hypertension 2005 46: 1261-1262. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Li, Y. Saito, K. Kuwahara, X. Rong, I. Kishimoto, M. Harada, Y. Adachi, M. Nakanishi, H. Kinoshita, M. Horiuchi, et al.
Guanylyl Cyclase-A Inhibits Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor-Mediated Pro-Hypertrophic Signaling in the Heart
Endocrinology, August 1, 2009; 150(8): 3759 - 3765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. R. Porrello, A. D'Amore, C. L. Curl, A. M. Allen, S. B. Harrap, W. G. Thomas, and L. M.D. Delbridge
Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Antagonizes Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor-Mediated Cardiomyocyte Autophagy
Hypertension, June 1, 2009; 53(6): 1032 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. Davis, M. V. Westfall, D. Townsend, M. Blankinship, T. J. Herron, G. Guerrero-Serna, W. Wang, E. Devaney, and J. M. Metzger
Designing Heart Performance by Gene Transfer
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1567 - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. Leatherbury, Q. Yu, B. Chatterjee, D. L. Walker, Z. Yu, X. Tian, and C. W. Lo
A novel mouse model of X-linked cardiac hypertrophy
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2701 - H2711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. Eguchi
Triple Twist Theory of Rho Inhibition by the Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor
Circ. Res., May 23, 2008; 102(10): 1143 - 1145.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X. Yan, A. J. T. Schuldt, R. L. Price, I. Amende, F.-F. Liu, K. Okoshi, K. K. L. Ho, A. J. Pope, T. K. Borg, B. H. Lorell, et al.
Pressure overload-induced hypertrophy in transgenic mice selectively overexpressing AT2 receptors in ventricular myocytes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1274 - H1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
M. Konigshoff, A. Wilhelm, A. Jahn, D. Sedding, O. V. Amarie, B. Eul, W. Seeger, L. Fink, A. Gunther, O. Eickelberg, et al.
The Angiotensin II Receptor 2 Is Expressed and Mediates Angiotensin II Signaling in Lung Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., December 1, 2007; 37(6): 640 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Mogi, M. Iwai, and M. Horiuchi
Emerging Concepts of Regulation of Angiotensin II Receptors: New Players and Targets for Traditional Receptors
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2007; 27(12): 2532 - 2539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. K. Mehta and K. K. Griendling
Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): C82 - C97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Suzuki, K. Eguchi, H. Ohtsu, S. Higuchi, S. Dhobale, G. D. Frank, E. D. Motley, and S. Eguchi
Activation of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase by the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5914 - 5920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Chen and J. L. Mehta
Angiotensin II-mediated oxidative stress and procollagen-1 expression in cardiac fibroblasts: blockade by pravastatin and pioglitazone
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1738 - H1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. H. Strauss and A. S. Hall
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers May Increase Risk of Myocardial Infarction: Unraveling the ARB-MI Paradox
Circulation, August 22, 2006; 114(8): 838 - 854.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. L. Reudelhuber
The Continuing Saga of the AT2 Receptor: A Case of the Good, the Bad, and the Innocuous
Hypertension, December 1, 2005; 46(6): 1261 - 1262.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/6/1347    most recent
01.HYP.0000193504.51489.cfv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D’Amore, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by D’Amore, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, W. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrowRelated Article