Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2006;47:288-295
Published online before print December 27, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000198427.96225.36
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Correction (v47,pe23)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/2/288    most recent
01.HYP.0000198427.96225.36v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bek, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jose, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bek, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jose, P. A.

(Hypertension. 2006;47:288.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Angiotensin-II Type 1 Receptor–Mediated Hypertension in D4 Dopamine Receptor–Deficient Mice

Martin J. Bek; Xiaoyan Wang; Laureano D. Asico; John E. Jones; Shaopeng Zheng; XiaoXi Li; Gilbert M. Eisner; David K. Grandy; Robert M. Carey; Patricio Soares-da-Silva; Pedro A. Jose

From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.J.B., X.W., L.D.A., J.E.J., S.Z., X.L., P.A.J.) and Medicine (G.M.E.), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; Department of Medicine (M.J.B.), University Clinics Muenster, Muenster, Germany; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (D.K.G.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore; University of Virginia Health Sciences Center (R.M.C.), Charlottesville, Va; and Institute of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (P.S-d-S.), Faculty of Medicine of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Wang, Dept of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, 4000 Reservoir Rd, NW, Washington, DC 20057. E-mail xw22{at}georgetown.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Dopamine receptors are important in systemic blood pressure regulation. D4 receptors are expressed in the kidney and brain, but their role in cardiovascular regulation is unknown. In pentobarbital-anesthetized mice, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were elevated in sixth-generation D4 receptor–deficient (D4–/–) mice and in tenth-generation D4–/– mice compared with D4 wild-type (D4+/+) littermates. The conscious blood pressures measured via a chronic arterial (femoral) catheter or telemetry (carotid) were also higher in D4–/– mice than in D4 littermates. Basal renal and plasma renin concentrations were similar in the 2 mouse strains. The protein expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor was increased in homogenates of kidney (330±53%, n=5) and brain (272±69%, n=5) of D4–/– mice relative to D4+/+ mice (kidney: 100±12%, n=5; brain: 100±32%, n=5). The expression of the receptor in renal membrane was also increased in D4–/– mice (289±28%, n=8) relative to D4+/+ mice (100±14%, n=10). In contrast, the expression in the heart was similar in the 2 strains. Bolus intravenous injection of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan initially decreased mean arterial pressures to a similar degree in D4–/– and D4+/+ littermates. However, the hypotensive effect of losartan dissipated after 10 minutes in D4+/+ mice, whereas the effect persisted for >45 minutes in D4–/– mice. We conclude that the absence of the D4 receptor increases blood pressure, possibly via increased angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression.


Key Words: dopamine • receptors, angiotensin II • mice • hypertension • angiotensin II • endothelin • vasopressins


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Essential hypertension is a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease.1 It is a heterogeneous disease in which both genetics and environment influence blood pressure.2 Dopamine affects cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms by its actions on renal hemodynamics and ion and water transport and by its regulation of hormones and humoral agents, such as aldosterone, catecholamines, endothelin, prolactin, proopiomelanocortin, renin, and vasopressin. In addition, dopamine can control blood pressure by acting on neuronal cardiovascular centers, heart, and arterial and venous vessels.3–9 Dopamine exerts its actions by occupation of the D1-like (D1 and D5) and D2-like (D2, D3, and D4) family of cell surface G protein–coupled receptors. We have reported that disruption of the D1, D2, D3, and D5 receptors leads to hypertension in mice, via specific pathophysiologic mechanisms.10–13 The cardiovascular consequences of disruption of the D4 receptor have not been reported. D4 receptors are expressed in the heart, renal collecting ducts, juxtaglomerular cells, and in brain nuclei known to affect blood pressure, but their role in cardiovascular regulation is unknown.14–17 Loci near the D4 receptor gene (11p15.5) have been linked to hypertension,18,19 and polymorphisms of the D4 receptor gene are associated with hypertension.20 Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the D4–/– mouse has a cardiovascular phenotype.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Generation of D4 Dopamine–Receptor Mutant Mice
The original F2 hybrid strain (129/SvxC57BL/6) carrying a mutant form of the D4 dopamine receptor was initially generated and backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice. Heterozygous (D4+/–) mice were mated to obtain D4–/– and D4+/+ littermates, and the D4–/– mice were backcrossed with C57BL/6 mice to obtain sixth- and tenth-generation mice in the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University.21 We used sixth-generation mice for acute studies and tenth-generation mice for chronic and immunoblotting studies. All of the animals were genotyped21 and treated in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines for ethical treatment and handling of animals in research.

Blood Pressure Measurement
Blood Pressures Under Anesthesia
Mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg IV) and tracheotomized (PE100).10–13 Catheters (PE50 heat-stretched to 180-µm tip) were inserted into the femoral vessels for fluid administration and blood pressure monitoring. Blood pressures were recorded (CardioMaxII, Columbus Instrument) after 1 hour of equilibration.

Blood Pressures Without Anesthesia
Conscious blood pressures were measured in 2 sets of mice. In the first set of studies, blood pressures were measured via a femoral artery catheter, coated with 5% heparin complex, threaded upward and out of a 5-mm incision at the nape of the neck.13 The catheter was flushed immediately (1/2 mg plasmin and 1000 U heparin/mL of sterile saline) and every 2 days thereafter. One to 3 days after catheter placement, blood pressures were measured in freely moving, unanesthetized mice. In the second set of studies, TA-PAC20 transmitters (DSI) were implanted into 1 carotid artery, and blood pressures were measured by telemetry 1 week after the surgery.22

Acute Saline Loading Study
After a 60-minute stabilization period after the catheter insertion and a baseline 60-minute period for blood pressure measurement, a normal saline load equivalent to 5% body weight was infused intravenously for 30 minutes. Urine was collected during saline loading via suprapubic cystostomy for another 30 minutes; 3 more urine collection periods of 60 minutes each were obtained after loading. Blood (50 µL) was obtained from the femoral artery before the load and at the end of the last urine collection. The kidneys were obtained for determination of renin concentration.

Acute Drug Infusion Studies
In additional experiments, several antagonists of receptors known to influence blood pressure were infused via a central venous catheter, and blood pressure and heart rate were monitored.11–13 The drugs were {alpha}-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine (5 ng/kg per minute), angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonist losartan (3 mg/kg over 30 s), endothelin A receptor antagonist BQ610 (100 µg/kg per minute for 10 minutes), endothelin B receptor (ETB) antagonist BQ788 (6.6 µg/kg per minute for 15 minutes), and V1 vasopressin receptor (V1) antagonist [1-(ß-mercapto-ß, ß-cyclopentamethylenepropionic acid)-2-(O-methyl)-tyrosine] arginine vasopressin (10 µg/kg over 30 s). The rationale and dosages of these drugs have been validated.11–13 The dose of losartan had been shown previously to have an effect of limited duration in wild-type mice.12 We also studied the acute effect on blood pressure of varying doses of bolus intravenous injections of angiotensin II (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 ng/kg per mouse). Mice were euthanized with pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) at the end of the experiments.

Measurement of Renin, Na+/K+-ATPase Activity, and Catechols
Plasma and renal renin concentrations were assessed by radioimmunoassay measuring the generation of angiotensin I.12 Na+/K+-ATPase activity in renal cortex or medulla was measured as the ouabain-sensitive dephosphorylation of (tris)-p-nitrophenyl phosphate by K+-p-nitrophenyl phosphatase.11,23 The kidneys were homogenized with 0.1 mol/L HClO4 and centrifuged at 6000g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant and urine catechol concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection.24

Chronic Sodium Balance Study With Ration Feeding in Metabolic Cages
The mice were maintained in metabolic cages to allow quantitative urine collections and ration feeding, modified from a rat-diet protocol.25,26 The baseline sodium diet (5 g/25 g body weight per day, TD.90228, Harlan Teklad) consisted of a gelled mixture of distilled water (10 mL/5 g of mouse chow), agar (0.04 g/10 mL of water), and 0.4% NaCl (added before gelation). The sodium replete diet was the same, except for the addition of 0.8% NaCl. All of the animals received the same amount of gelled food, determined by weighing the gelled mixture. On day 3, the mice were ration-fed 0.4% NaCl gelled food. On day zero, the ration was changed to 0.8% NaCl for 1 week. Seven days later, the mice were euthanized after blood pressures were recorded with anesthesia. Serum and urinary samples were analyzed for Na, K, Cl (E4A Electrolyte system, Beckman) and creatinine concentrations (Creatinine Analyzer2, Beckman). After sacrifice, kidneys, brains, and hearts were homogenized, as reported previously.25,26 In additional studies, mouse kidney homogenates were centrifuged at 42 000g to obtain membrane fractions.

Semiquantitative Immunoblotting
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies recognizing the AT1 receptor and actin were purchased from Santa Cruz (SC-1173) and Sigma (A5060), respectively. The specificity of the AT1 antibody has been reported.27–29 Semiquantitative immunoblotting was used to compare AT1 protein expression, as described previously.25,26,28,29 The bands were scanned and quantified by the NIH Image J program. The densitometry values were corrected by actin and shown as percentage of mean density of D4+/+ mice.

Statistical Analysis
Data expressed as mean±SE were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA for comparisons within groups and 1-way factorial ANOVA for comparisons among groups. Student t test was used for 2-group comparison, with Bonferroni correction as indicated. P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Blood Pressure and Other Physiological Data in D4–/– Mice
Figure 1A shows that the systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial (MAP) blood pressures (mm Hg) measured under anesthesia in sixth-generation mice were higher in D4–/– mice (SBP, 128±2; DBP, 98±1; MAP, 108±1; n=27) than in D4+/+ littermates (SBP, 104±1; DBP, 79±1; MAP, 87±1; n=18; 8- to 12-months old, mixed gender). No differences in MAP between genders were found in D4+/+ (female: 93±1, n=10; male: 90±1, n=8) and D4–/– mice (female: 113±4, n=10 male: 110±2, n=18). Body weights were the same in D4+/+ and D4–/– mice (28±1 g in both groups). However, heart weights (% body weight) were greater in D4–/– than in D4+/+ mice (0.50±0.02 versus 0.43±0.01; P<0.05), whereas kidney weights (1.15±0.08 versus 1.23±0.06) were similar. The heart rates (447±6 versus 430±8 bpm) were not different between the 2 mouse strains.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Blood pressures (BPs) of D4–/– and D4+/+ mice measured under pentobarbital anesthesia. BPs were obtained in mice of both genders from the sixth generation (D4–/–: n=27; D4+/+: n=18, 8- to 12-months old; A) and tenth generation (4- to 6-months old; 7 pairs; B). Data are mean±SE. *P<0.05 vs D4+/+ mice, t test.

In pentobarbital-anesthetized tenth-generation (4- to 6-months old, mixed gender), the blood pressures of D4–/– mice were also higher than in D4+/+ littermates (Figure 1B). Conscious blood pressures were also higher in the tenth-generation D4–/– than in D4+/+ mice (4- to 6-months old, mixed gender) measured via the femoral artery (Figure 2A) or by telemetry (Figure 2B and 2C). SBPs measured by telemetry were lower than those measured via the femoral catheter, presumably because there were no distractions in the mice studied by telemetry.


Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. BPs of conscious D4–/– and D4+/+ mice (tenth generation, 4- to 5-months old). (A) BPs of mice measured via a chronic femoral artery catheter (3 pairs). The bihourly SBP (B) and nighttime SBP and MAP (C) of mice measured by telemetry (3 pairs). Data are mean±SE. *P<0.05 vs D4+/+ mice, t test, with Bonferroni correction (B).

Arterial Blood Pressure, Renal Function, and Catechol Excretions in Response to an Acute Sodium Load
SBP, DBP, and MAP were not affected by an acute sodium load in D4–/– and D4+/+ mice (data not shown). Glomerular filtration rate was not different between the 2 mouse strains and was not affected by saline loading (Table 1). Urine flow and sodium excretion, which were increased by saline loading, were also similar in the 2 mouse strains. Urinary catechol excretions were similar in D4–/– and D4+/+ mice. Saline loading increased dopamine excretion in both mouse strains without affecting the excretion of other catechols (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. The Effect of Saline Loading on Renal Function in D4+/+ (n=6) and D4–/– (n=18) Mice


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. The Effect of Saline Loading on Urinary Catechols (pg/min) in D4+/+ (n=5) and D4–/– (n=17) Mice

Renal and Plasma Renin Concentrations in D4–/– Mice
Renal renin concentrations (µg A1/g kidney per hour) were similar in D4–/– mice (57.5±7.2, n=18) and D4+/+ mice (70.2±18.3, n=5). Plasma renin concentrations were also not significantly different between D4–/– (3835±2097 ng A1/mL per hour, n=18) and D4+/+ (3540±2881, n=5) mice.

Na+/K+-ATPase Activity
Renal cortical and medullary Na+/K+-ATPase activities were not significantly changed in D4–/– mice (cortex=34.2±0.5 nmol Pi/mg protein per minute, medulla=34.2±0.5, n=17) compared with D4+/+ mice (cortex=33.4±2.0 nmol Pi/mg protein per minute, medulla=31.5±2.6, n=5). The D1 receptor agonist, SKF81297 (1 µmol/L), decreased Na+/K+-ATPase activity to a similar extent in cortex (D4+/+=25.98±2.91%, D4–/–=21.60±1.41%) and medulla (D4+/+=23.17±3.34%, D4–/–=20.02±1.37%; P>0.05, ANOVA) in the 2 mouse strains.

Role of Blood Pressure–Regulating Systems in the Hypertension of D4–/– Mice
Bolus intravenous injection of losartan decreased MAP promptly and to a similar degree initially in the 2 strains. However, the effect dissipated quickly with recovery toward baseline 10 minutes after the injection in D4+/+ mice, whereas the hypotensive effect of losartan persisted for >45 minutes in D4–/– mice (Figure 3a). In contrast, the V1 vasopressin receptor antagonist (Figure 3b) and ETB receptor antagonist (Figure 3c) increased MAP in D4–/– but not in D4+/+ mice, albeit modestly. Blockade of endothelin A receptors had no effect on blood pressure in either mouse strain, whereas blockade of {alpha}-adrenergic receptors with phentolamine decreased blood pressure to a similar extent in D4–/– and D4+/+ mice (Figure 3d). Bolus injections of angiotensin II (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 ng/kg per mouse) dose-dependently increased blood pressure in both D4+/+ mice [Yc=16.45+(5.6xdose), n=5] and D4–/– mice [Yc=13.89+(3.37xdose), n=4; P<0.05]. Although, a higher MAP was found in D4–/– mice than in D4+/+ mice at any dose, the MAP tended to increase to a greater extent in D4+/+ than in D4–/– mice, reaching significance at 10 ng ({Delta}MAP, mm Hg, D4+/+: 67±4, n=5; D4–/–: 44±4, n=4; P<0.05, t test; Figure 4).


Figure 3
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of antagonists to {alpha}-adrenergic, AT1, endothelin (A and B), and V1 vasopressin receptors on MAP pressure in anesthetized D4+/+ and D4–/– mice. (a) AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan, was given as an intravenous bolus injection (D4+/+, n=6; D4–/–, n=5). A decrease in blood pressure was noted in both D4+/+ and D4–/– mice immediately after the injection(P<0.05, ANVR, Newman Keuls test). However, a significantly longer duration of BP suppression was observed in D4–/– mice compared with D4+/+ mice beginning 8 minutes after losartan administration and lasting as long as 45 minutes. *P<0.05 vs D4–/–, t test. (b) V1 vasopressin receptor antagonist, [1-(ß-mercapto-ß, ß-cyclopentamethylenepropionic acid)-2-(O-methyl)-tyrosine] arginine vasopressin, was given intravenously (D4+/+, n=6; D4–/–, n=4). A slight decrease in blood pressure was noted in D4+/+ mice 2 minutes after the administration. In contrast, a slight increase in blood pressure was noted in D4–/– mice 10 minutes after the administration of the V1 vasopressin antagonist (P<0.05, ANVR, Newman Keuls test). Differences between D4+/+ and D4–/– mice became evident at 8 minutes (*P<0.05, t test). (c) ETB receptor antagonist, BQ 788, was infused intravenously (D4+/+, n=6; D4–/–, n=6). A slight increase in blood pressure was noted in D4–/– but not in D4+/+, 8 minutes after the start of BQ 788 infusion (P<0.05, ANVR, Newman Keuls test). Differences between D4+/+ and D4–/– mice became evident at 9 minutes (*P<0.05, t test). (d) ETA antagonist BQ 610 or the {alpha}-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine was infused intravenously (D4+/+, n=6; D4–/–, n=4). There were no effects of BQ 610 on blood pressure, but a significant decrease in blood pressure was noted 5 minutes after the infusion of phentolamine in D4+/+ mice and 7 minutes in D4–/– mice (P>0.05, ANVR, Newman Keuls test).


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of angiotensin II on MAP in anesthetized D4+/+ and D4–/– mice. Angiotensin II dose-dependently (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 ng/kg per mouse) increased the blood pressure in both D4+/+ [Yc=16.45+(5.6xdose); n=5] and D4–/– mice [Yc=13.89+(3.37xdose); n=4]. MAPs were always higher in D4–/– than in D4+/+ mice (* P<0.05, ANVR, Newman Keuls test). However, the dose-dependent increase in MAP caused by angiotensin II was greater in D4+/+ than in D4–/– mice and reached significance at 10 ng (* P<0.05, t test).

Chronic Sodium Balance Study
Age- and gender-matched D4–/– mice and D4+/+ littermates (tenth-generation) and C57/BL6 mice (Taconic, Germantown, NY) were housed in the animal facility under the same conditions for >1 month before use. Backcrossing to the sixth generation or to more than the tenth generation results in a C57/BL6 genetic background >98%30 or >99% congenic,31 respectively. In agreement with data shown in Figure 1A and 1B, SBP and DBP under pentobarbital anesthesia were higher in D4–/– than in D4+/+ mice (female, 6 months old). D4–/– mice weighed less than D4+/+ mice possibly because of the ration feeding (sodium intake=0.8% NaCl) in metabolic cages. Sodium and water excretions (normalized by body weight) tended to be lower in D4–/– than in D4+/+ mice, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Creatinine clearance and serum sodium concentration were similar in D4–/– and D4+/+ mice (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Body Weight, Blood Pressure, Creatinine Clearance, and Sodium and Water Excretion in Ration-Fed Mice

AT1 Receptor Protein Expression
To determine a mechanism for the involvement of the AT1 receptor in the hypertension of D4–/– mice, we measured AT1 receptor protein expression in the ration-fed tenth-generation D4–/– mice and C57/BL6 mice. AT1 receptor expression (45 kDa) in whole-kidney homogenates of D4–/– mice was increased (330±53%, normalized by the band density of D4+/+ set to 100%, n=5; P<0.05) compared with D4+/+ mice (100±12%, n=5; Figure 5A). AT1 receptor expression was also increased in whole-brain homogenates of D4–/– mice (272±69%; P<0.05) compared with D4+/+ mice (100±32%; Figure 5B). In contrast, there were no differences in AT1 expression in whole heart homogenates between the 2 mouse strains (Figure 5C).


Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Immunoblots of AT1 receptors from kidney, brain, and heart homogenates in ration-fed D4–/– mice (left, n=5, tenth generation) and age- and gender-matched C57/BL6 mice (Taconic, Germantown, NY; right, n=5). (A) Immunoblots of AT1 receptors in homogenates from whole kidneys. Each lane was loaded with a sample from a different mouse. The AT1 receptor band densities were corrected by actin expression. AT1 receptor expression was increased in D4–/– mice relative to D4+/+ mice (n=5; *P<0.05 vs D4+/+, t test). (B) Immunoblots of AT1 receptors in homogenates from whole brain. AT1 receptor expression was increased in D4–/– mice relative to D4+/+ mice (*P<0.05 vs D4+/+, t test). (C) Immunoblots of AT1 receptors in homogenates from whole heart. There were no differences between D4–/– and D4+/+ mice.

In additional experiments, tenth-generation D4–/– and D4+/+ mice littermates (mixed gender, 4 to 5 months old) were studied to achieve a >99% C57/BL6 genetic background.31 There were no differences in body weight between D4–/– mice (31±2 g, n=10) and D4+/+ littermates (27±2 g, n=8), whereas blood pressures were higher in D4–/– mice than in D4+/+ littermates (Figure 1B). AT1 receptor expression was measured in kidney membrane fractions; receptors in the cytosol would not be responsive to angiotensin II stimulation. AT1 receptor expression in kidney membrane fractions was increased in D4–/– mice relative to D4+/+ littermates (D4+/+ mice: 100±14%; D4–/– mice: 289±28; % of D4+/+; P<0.05; Figure 6), in agreement with studies using renal homogenates.


Figure 6
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunoblots of AT1 receptors of renal membranes from tenth-generation D4–/– mice and D4+/+ littermates. Top, immunoblot of AT1 receptors in membranes from whole kidneys of D4+/+ (left, n=6) and D4–/– (right, n=4) littermates. Bottom, bar graphs; AT1 receptor expression corrected by {alpha}-actin was increased in D4–/– mice (n=10) relative to D4+/+ littermates (n=8). *P<0.05 vs D4+/+, t test.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present studies show that the complete lack of D4 dopamine receptors resulted in increased blood pressure. Furthermore, the increased blood pressure in the mutant mice was associated with a prolonged depressor response caused by the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan. The transient effect of losartan in the D4+/+ mice was related to the dose and similar to the hypotensive effect in D3+/+ mice.12 The prolonged hypotensive effect of losartan in the D4–/– mice is also similar to the effect in D3–/– mice.12 The duration of the hypotensive effect was longest in the D3–/– mice, intermediate in the D3+/– mice, and shortest in the D3+/+ mice. There were no differences in plasma or renal renin concentrations between D4–/– and D4+/+ mice. This contrasts with the elevation of renal renin concentration in the hypertensive D3–/– mice.12

The mechanism underlying the AT1-dependent high blood pressure in the D4–/– mice is not readily apparent. Aberrant interactions between D3 and AT1 receptors were found in spontaneously hypertensive rats.28 It is possible that the D4 receptor similarly regulates the AT1 receptor. D4 receptors are expressed in brain areas that contribute to the regulation of blood pressure, for example, nucleus tractus solitarius.32–35 Because the differential effect of AT1 receptor blockade on blood pressure became significant at later rather than earlier time points, we presumed that the AT1 receptor-mediated hypertension in D4–/– mice is, in part, central in origin. This may also explain why the acute hypertensive effect of angiotensin II was reduced in D4 receptor–deficient mice compared with wild-type mice. However, AT1 protein expression in whole brain and renal homogenates and membranes of D4–/– mice were increased relative to D4+/+ mice. The finding that the increase in AT1 receptor protein in the kidneys of D4–/– mice was not associated with sodium retention may indicate a counteracting effect of another receptor stimulated by angiotensin II outside the central nervous system, possibly the AT2 receptor.36 The absence of a difference in AT1 receptor expression in the heart of D4–/– and D4+/+ mice also suggests tissue-specific D4 regulation of the AT1 receptor. These remain speculative at this time.

Evidence has accumulated that the increase in blood pressure caused by central AT1 activation is mediated with37–40 or without41–44 activation of the sympathetic nervous system. In the present study, {alpha}-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine decreased blood pressure to a similar extent in D4–/– and D4+/+ mice. This observation may be specific to the D4–/– mice, because the {alpha}-adrenergic blockade decreased blood pressure to a greater extent in D2–/– and D5–/– mice than in their wild-type counterparts.11,13 There were also no differences in renal or urinary catechol excretion between D4+/+ and D4–/– mice. The pressor effect mediated by AT1 receptors expressed in the central nervous system has also been shown to be mediated, in part, by activation of central V1 receptors.38,45,46 The increased blood pressure caused by disruption of the D5 dopamine receptor is characterized by activation of central V1 vasopressin receptors.13 However, in the current study, V1 vasopressin receptor blockade did not decrease but actually produced a slight increase in blood pressure in D4–/– mice, suggesting a different mechanism to be involved.

Endothelin receptors may mediate pressor and depressor effects.47–49 We have reported that disruption of the D2 dopamine receptor in mice increased blood pressure possibly via the vasoconstrictor ETB2 (presumably in vascular smooth muscle or in brain centers).11 The D4 receptor, like the D2 receptor, is not expressed in endothelial cells.50 Thus, neither D4 nor D2 receptors can activate the vasodilatory ETB1 receptors in endothelial cells. The modest increase in blood pressure by blockade of ETB receptors might be mediated via vasoconstrictor ETB2 in the D4–/– mice.

Dopamine has been shown to act as a potent intrarenal natriuretic hormone in humans and rodents.3,4 D4 receptors have been shown to antagonize vasopressin- and aldosterone-dependent sodium reabsorption in the cortical collecting duct.51,52 In the present study, we did not find significant differences in renal Na+/K+-ATPase activity and urinary dopamine excretion between D4–/– and D4+/+ mice. The D4–/– mice did not have an impaired ability to excrete an acute saline load. There are also no differences in sodium excretion between conscious D4–/– mice and D4+/+ littermates in spite of an increase in AT1 receptors in the kidney of D4–/– mice. Possibly, the high blood pressure may have elicited a pressure natriuresis through other mechanism that obfuscated any deficits in the renal handling of sodium in D4–/– mice.53,54

In summary, we have found that disruption of the D4 receptor in mice causes hypertension that is associated with increased expression of AT1 receptors in the brain and kidney but not in the heart. The mechanism by which D4 receptors regulate AT1 receptor expression remains to be determined.

Perspectives
This study demonstrates that disruption of the D4 dopamine receptor results in increased blood pressure that may be related to activation of AT1 receptors in the brain. However, determination of AT1 receptor expression and function in specific brain nuclei are needed to understand how the D4 receptor interacts with the AT1 receptor in the central regulation of blood pressure. AT1 receptors are also increased in the kidneys of D4–/– mice, but these mice do not have an impaired ability to excrete an acute sodium load. It is possible that D4–/– mice may not be able to excrete a chronic sodium load, but that remains to be determined. Because the D4 receptor gene locus is linked to and D4 receptor variants are associated with hypertension,20 the relevance of the D4 receptor in the pathogenesis of human essential hypertension needs to be evaluated.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health: HL23081, HL68696, DK39308, DK52612 (P.A.J.), HL074940 (P.A.J. and R.A.F.), DA12062 (D.K.G.); National Kidney Foundation and Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (M.B.); and POCTI/35747/FCB/2000 from Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal (P.S.). We also thank Dr Marcelo Rubinstein for generating the D4–/– mice and Katherine Suchland for excellent technical assistance with the mice.


*    Footnotes
 
The first 2 authors contributed equally to this work.

Received May 31, 2005; first decision June 16, 2005; accepted November 21, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Pickering G. Hypertension: definitions, natural histories, and consequences. In: Hypertension, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. New York: Raven Press; 1995: 3–22.

2. Lifton RP. Molecular genetics of human blood pressure variation. Science. 1999; 272: 676–680.

3. Jose PA, Eisner GM, Felder RA. The renal dopamine receptors in health and disease. Pharmacol Ther. 1998; 80: 149–182.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Hussain T, Lokhandwala MF. Renal dopamine receptor function in hypertension. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 187–197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. van den Buuse M. Role of the mesolimbic dopamine system in cardiovascular homeostasis. Stimulation of the ventral tegmental area modulates the effect of vasopressin on blood pressure in conscious rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998; 25: 661–668.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Sowers JR, Viosca SP, Windsor C, Korenman SG. Influence of dopaminergic mechanisms on 24-hour secretory patterns of prolactin, luteinizing hormone and testosterone in recumbent men. J Endocrinol Invest. 1983; 6: 9–15.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Carey RM, Sen S. Recent progress in the control of aldosterone secretion. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1986; 42: 251–296.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Soares-da-Silva P, Pestana M, Vieira-Coelho MA, Fernandes MH, Albino-Teixeira A. Assessment of renal dopaminergic system activity in the nitric oxide-deprived hypertensive rat model. Br J Pharmacol. 1995; 114: 1403–1413.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Roitman MF, Schafe GE, Thiele TE, Bernstein IL. Dopamine and sodium appetite: antagonists suppress sham drinking of NaCl solutions in the rat. Behav Neurosci. 1997; 111: 606–611.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Albrecht FE, Drago J, Felder RA, Printz MP, Eisner GM, Robillard JE, Sibley DR, Westphal HJ, Jose PA. Role of the D1A dopamine receptor in the pathogenesis of genetic hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97: 2283–2288.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Li XX, Bek M, Asico LD, Yang Z, Grandy DK, Goldstein DS, Rubinstein M, Eisner GM, Jose PA. Adrenergic and endothelin B receptor-dependent hypertension in dopamine receptor type-2 knockout mice. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 303–308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Asico LD, Ladines C, Fuchs S, Accili D, Carey RM, Semeraro C, Pocchiari F, Felder RA, Eisner GM, Jose PA. Disruption of the dopamine D3 receptor gene produces renin-dependent hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 493–498.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Hollon TR, Bek MJ, Lachowicz JE, Ariano MA, Mezey E, Ramachandran R, Wersinger SR, Soares-da-Silva P, Liu ZF, Grinberg A, Drago J, Young WS 3rd, Westphal H, Jose PA, Sibley DR. Mice lacking D5 dopamine receptors have increased sympathetic tone and are hypertensive. J Neurosci. 2002; 22: 10801–10810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Ricci A, Marchal-Victorion S, Bronzetti E, Parini A, Amenta F, and Tayebati SK. Dopamine D4 receptor expression in rat kidney: evidence for pre- and postjunctional localization. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002; 50: 1091–1096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Sun D, Wilborn TW, Schafer JA. Dopamine D4 receptor isoform mRNA and protein are expressed in the rat cortical collecting duct. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: F742–F751.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. O’Malley KL, Harmon S, Tang L, Todd RD. The rat dopamine D4 receptor: sequence, gene structure, and demonstration of expression in the cardiovascular system. New Biol. 1992; 4: 137–146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Lahti RA, Roberts RC, Cochrane EV, Primus RJ, Gallager DW, Conley RR, Tamminga CA. Direct determination of dopamine D4 receptors in normal and schizophrenic postmortem brain tissue: a [3H]NGD-94-1 study. Mol Psychiatry. 1998; 3: 528–533.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Stein CM, Song Y, Elston RC, Jun G, Tiwari HK, Iyengar SK. Structural equation model-based genome scan for the metabolic syndrome. BMC Genet. 2003; 31 (Suppl 1): S99.[CrossRef]

19. Ishimitsu T, Hosoya K, Tsukada K, Minami J, Futoh Y, Ono H, Ohrui M, Hino J, Kangawa K, Matsuoka H. Microsatellite DNA polymorphism of human adrenomedullin gene in normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 9–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Sen S, Nesse R, Sheng L, Stoltenberg SF, Gleibmerman L, Burmeister M, Weder AB. Association between a dopamine 4 receptor polymorphism and blood pressure in the GenNet study: Evidence for a gene-age interaction. Council for High Blood Pressure Research. 2003; P208(abstracts).

21. Rubinstein M, Phillips TJ, Bunzow JR, Falzone TL, Dziewczapolski G, Zhang G, Fang Y, Larson JL, McDougall JA, Chester JA, Saez C, Pugsley TA, Gershanik O, Low MJ, Grandy DK. Mice lacking dopamine D4 receptors are supersensitive to ethanol, cocaine, and methamphetamine. Cell. 1997; 19: 90: 991–1001.

22. Kawada N, Solis G, Ivey N, Connors S, Dennehy K, Modlinger P, Hamel R, Kawada JT, Imai E, Langenbach R, Welch WJ, Wilcox CS. Cyclooxygenase-1-deficient mice have high sleep-to-wake blood pressure ratios and renal vasoconstriction. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 1131–1138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Swann AC. (Na+, K+)-adenosine triphosphatase regulation by the sympathetic nervous system: effects of noradrenergic stimulation and lesions in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1984; 228: 304–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Vieira-Coelho MA, Serrao P, Guimaraes JT, Pestana M, Soares-da-Silva P. Concerted action of dopamine on renal and intestinal Na+-K+-ATPase in the rat remnant kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000; 279: F1033–F1044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Kim GH, Masilamani S, Turner R, Mitchell C, Wade JB, Knepper MA. The thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter is an aldosterone-induced protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 14552–14557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Wang X, Masilamani S, Nielsen J, Kwon T, Brooks H, Nielsen S, Knepper MA. The renal thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter as mediator of the aldosterone-escape phenomenon. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 215–222.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Park SH, Han HJ. The mechanism of angiotensin II binding downregulation by high glucose in primary renal proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002; 282: F228–F237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Zeng C, Asico LD, Wang X, Hopfer U, Eisner GM, Felder RA, Jose PA. Angiotensin II regulation of AT1 and D3 dopamine receptors in renal proximal tubule cells of SHR. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 724–729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Zeng C, Luo Y, Asico LD, Hopfer U, Eisner GM, Felder Jose PA. Perturbation of D1 dopamine and AT1 receptor interaction in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 787–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Hickman-Davis JM. Implications of mouse genotype for phenotype. News Physiol Sci. 2001; 16: 9–22.

31. Wolfer DP, Crusio WE, Lipp HP. Knockout mice: simple solutions to the problems of genetic background and flanking genes. Trends Neurosci. 2002; 25: 336–340.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Rubinstein M, Cepeda C, Hurst RS, Flores-Hernandez J, Ariano MA, Falzone TL, Kozell LB, Meshul CK, Bunzow JR, Low MJ, Levine MS, Grandy DK Grandy DK. Dopamine D4 receptor-deficient mice display cortical hyperexcitability. J Neurosci. 2001; 21: 3756–3763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Hyde TM, Knable MB, Murray AM. Distribution of dopamine D1–D4 receptor subtypes in human dorsal vagal complex. Synapse. 1996; 24: 224–232.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Defagot MC, Malchiodi EL, Villar MJ, Antonelli MC. Distribution of D4 dopamine receptor in rat brain with sequence-specific antibodies. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1997; 45: 1–12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Ariano MA, Wang J, Noblett KL, Larson ER, Sibley DR. Cellular distribution of the rat D4 dopamine receptor protein in the CNS using anti-receptor antisera. Brain Res. 1997; 752: 26–34.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Carey RM. Update on the role of the AT2 receptor. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005; 14: 67–71.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Fink GD. Long-term sympatho-excitatory effect of angiotensin II: a mechanism of spontaneous and renovascular hypertension. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1997; 24: 91–95.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Phillips MI, Sumners C. Angiotensin II in central nervous system physiology. Regul Pept. 1998; 78: 1–11.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Ferrario CM. Neurogenic actions of angiotensin II. Hypertension. 1983; 5: V73–V79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Tagawa T, Dampney RA. AT1 receptors mediate excitatory inputs to rostral ventrolateral medullar pressor neurons from hypothalamus. Hypertension. 1999; 34: 1301–1307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Unger T, Badoer E, Ganten D, Lang RE, Rettig R. Brain angiotensin: pathways and pharmacology. Circulation. 1988; 77: I40–54.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Tseng CJ, Chou LL, Ger LP, Tung CS. Cardiovascular effects of angiotensin III in brainstem nuclei of normotensive and hypertensive rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994; 268: 558–564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Yamamoto K, Ueno Y, Arita M, Suruda H, Hano T, Masuyama Y. Contributions of the sympathetic nervous system, vasopressin and baroreceptor function in brain angiotensin II excess-induced hypertension in the dog. Clin Exp Hypertens A. 1988; 10 (Suppl 1): 309–316.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Toney GM, Porter JP. Functional roles of brain AT1 and AT2 receptors in the central angiotensin II pressor response in conscious young spontaneously hypertensive rats. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1993; 71: 193–199.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Brooks VL, Osborn JW. Hormonal-sympathetic interactions in long-term regulation of arterial pressure: an hypothesis. Am J Physiol. 1995; 268: R1343–R1358.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Hasser EM, Cunningham JT, Sullivan MJ, Curtis KS, Blaine EH, Hay M. Area postrema and sympathetic nervous system effects of vasopressin and angiotensin II. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2000; 27: 432–436.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Touyz RM, Schiffrin EL. Role of endothelin in human hypertension. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003; 81: 533–541.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Pollock DM. Renal endothelin in hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2000; 9: 157–164.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

49. Mizuguchi T, Nishiyama M, Moroi K, Tanaka H, Saito T, Masuda Y, Masaki T, de Wit D, Yanagisawa M, Kimura S. Analysis of two pharmacologically predicted endothelin B receptor subtypes by using the endothelin B receptor gene knockout mouse. Br J Pharmacol. 1997; 120: 1427–1430.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

50. Amenta F, Barili P, Bronzetti E, Felici L, Mignini F, Ricci A. Localization of dopamine receptor subtypes in systemic arteries. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2000; 22: 277–288.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

51. Schafer JA, Li L, Sun D. The collecting duct, dopamine and vasopressin-dependent hypertension. Acta Physiol Scand. 2000; 168: 239–244.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

52. Saito O, Ando Y, Kusano E, Asano Y. Functional characterization of basolateral and luminal dopamine receptors in rabbit CCD. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001; 281: F114–F122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Pluznick JL, Wei P, Carmines PK, Sansom SC. Renal fluid and electrolyte handling in BKCa-beta1–/– mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003; 284: F1274–F1279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54. Hall JE, Brands MW, Henegar JR. Angiotensin II and long-term arterial pressure regulation: the overriding dominance of the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10 (Suppl 12): S258–S265.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
H.-H. Hsu, K. Duning, H. H. Meyer, M. Stolting, T. Weide, S. Kreusser, T. van Le, C. Gerard, R. Telgmann, S.-M. Brand-Herrmann, et al.
Hypertension in mice lacking the CXCR3 chemokine receptor
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): F780 - F789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Zeng, I. Armando, Y. Luo, G. M. Eisner, R. A. Felder, and P. A. Jose
Dysregulation of dopamine-dependent mechanisms as a determinant of hypertension: studies in dopamine receptor knockout mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H551 - H569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
I. Armando, X. Wang, V. A. M. Villar, J. E. Jones, L. D. Asico, C. Escano, and P. A. Jose
Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Hypertension in Dopamine D2 Receptor-Deficient Mice
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 672 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Correction (v47,pe23)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/2/288    most recent
01.HYP.0000198427.96225.36v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bek, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jose, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bek, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jose, P. A.