| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2006;47:665.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Pharmacology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to A.H. Jan Danser, Department of Pharmacology, Rm EE1418b, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail a.danser{at}erasmusmc.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: mineralocorticoids blood flow arrythmia ischemia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In support of this possibility, spironolactone improved electrophysiological parameters in subjects with heart failure,4 and, in combination with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor fosinopril, reduced the arrhythmic score after myocardial infarction.5 Because spironolactone is a nonspecific MR antagonist, these effects do not necessarily involve MR.6 Spironolactone also reduced infarct size and improved the recovery of left ventricular pressure (LVP) after 45 minutes of global ischemia in the isolated perfused rat heart.7 Interestingly, spironolactone did not block aldosterone-induced vasoconstriction, which worsens cardiac contractile and metabolic function in the ischemic heart.8,9 It also did not prevent the inotropic effects of aldosterone in the heart,7,10 and, if anything, exerted inotropic effects of its own, independent of aldosterone.
The aldosterone concentrations required to exert the above inotropic and vasoconstrictor effects are in the nanomolar range.7,9,10 In the heart, it has been proposed that the presence of such high levels depend on local synthesis of aldosterone, although not all of the studies agree on this issue.1113 Across the human coronary vascular bed, both release and uptake of aldosterone have been observed.14,15
In the present study, using the isolated perfused rat Langendorff heart, we first investigated whether the new and more selective MR antagonist eplerenone exerts the same cardioprotective effects as spironolactone, to additionally unravel whether these effects are MR mediated. Second, we studied the cardiac uptake and washout of circulating aldosterone to determine whether eplerenone, if exerting an MR-dependent effect, interferes with locally synthesized or blood-derived aldosterone.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ethical Approval
All of the experiments were performed under the regulations of the Animal Care Committee of the Erasmus MC, in accordance with the "Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" as approved by the American Physiological Society.
Experiments in Langendorff Hearts
Male Wistar rats (n=80, weight 300 to 420 g) obtained from Harlan (Zeist, the Netherlands) were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, IP). Hearts were rapidly excised and cooled in ice-cold Krebs-Henseleit solution (composition in mmol/L: NaCl 125, KCl 4.7, NaHCO3 20, NaH2PO4 0.43, MgCl2 1.0, CaCl2 1.3, and D-glucose 9.1; pH 7.4) until contractions stopped and prepared for Langendorff perfusion. Continuously carbogen-gassed (95% O2/5% CO2) Krebs-Henseleit solution at 37°C was perfused immediately after cannulation of the aorta at a constant perfusion pressure of 80 mm Hg. A water-filled latex balloon was placed in the left ventricle via the left atrium to measure LVP. The volume of the balloon was adjusted to achieve a stable left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of 5 mm Hg during initial equilibration, and this volume was maintained throughout the experiment. Hearts were paced at 350 bpm. Coronary flow (CF) was measured by an in-line flow probe (Transonic Systems).
After a stabilization period of 15 minutes, 100-µL bolus injections were applied to construct dose-response curves to aldosterone, vehicle (ethanol), and/or eplerenone. In a second series of experiments, we evaluated the effects of aldosterone and eplerenone during ischemia and reperfusion. Hearts were subjected to 45 minutes of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 hours of reperfusion. Occlusion was preceded by no treatment (control) or a 15-minute exposure 100 nmol/L aldosterone, 1 µmol/L eplerenone, or 100 nmol/L aldosterone+1 µmol/L eplerenone. Aldosterone and/or eplerenone remained present in the perfusion buffer throughout the remainder of the experiment. After the 3-hour reperfusion period, area at risk and infarct size were determined as described before. In a third series of experiments, we determined the uptake and disappearance of aldosterone in the heart. Blood (
0.5 mL) was collected from the rats used in these experiments to measure the endogenous plasma levels of aldosterone. Hearts were perfused with 3, 10, or 30 nmol/L of aldosterone or vehicle for 30 minutes in the absence or presence of 1 µmol/L eplerenone. After the 30-minute perfusion period, the hearts were either frozen in liquid nitrogen (LN2) or subjected to a washout period. One-minute samples of coronary effluent were collected before the perfusion; at 20 and 25 minutes after the start of the perfusion; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes during the washout period. Aldosterone-perfused hearts that had been washed for 5 or 30 minutes were also frozen in LN2.
Aldosterone Measurements
Aldosterone was measured by solid-phase radioimmunoassay (Diagnostic Products Corporation)16 in rat plasma, coronary effluent, and cardiac tissue. To extract aldosterone from cardiac tissue, hearts were homogenized 1:2 in methanol. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes. Supernatants were then collected, vacuum dried, and dissolved in water before the assay. The detection limit was 25 pg/mL in plasma and coronary effluent and 10 pg/g wet weight.
Data Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Dose-response curves were analyzed using the logistic function described by de Lean et al17 to obtain pEC50 (10log EC50) values. The maximum effect (Emax) was determined by repeated-measures ANOVA. Aldosterone levels below the detection limit were taken to be equal to the detection limit. Washout kinetics were analyzed according to a 1- or 2-compartment model. Statistical comparison between various conditions was by ANOVA, followed by post hoc evaluation according to Tukey. Univariate linear regression between the aldosterone levels in cardiac tissue and coronary effluent was assessed by calculation of Pearsons coefficient of correlation. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery reduced LVP to
30 mm Hg and decreased CF by
50% (Table). In control hearts (n=6), LVP and CF increased rapidly during the reperfusion phase (Table), stabilizing after
20 minutes at 44±3% and 85±13% of preischemia values (Figure 2). LVEDP increased to 23±5 mm Hg. Pretreatment with aldosterone (n=6) did not affect LVP recovery, nor did it prevent the rise in LVEDP. Aldosterone also did not reduce CF recovery (Figure 2). Pretreatment with eplerenone (n=6) significantly enhanced recovery of LVP (P<0.05) but not of CF (Table; Figure 2). Eplerenone did not diminish the rise in LVEDP. Ventricular fibrillation occurred within the first 10 minutes of reperfusion of all control hearts (Table). Neither eplerenone nor aldosterone affected the incidence of fibrillation. The area at risk was identical in all of the hearts (Table). Infarct size (expressed as a percentage of the area at risk) was 68±2% in control hearts (Figure 2). Eplerenone reduced infarct size (P<0.05), whereas the infarct size in aldosterone-treated hearts was not different from control. Combined exposure to eplerenone and aldosterone (n=7) yielded similar results as eplerenone alone (Table; Figure 2).
|
|
Kinetic Studies
Aldosterone levels in rat plasma were 85±16 pg/mL (n=5). Aldosterone levels in the perfusate of vehicle-perfused hearts were <58±15 pg/mL. In 5 of 8 hearts, these levels were below the detection limit. The cardiac aldosterone levels in vehicle-perfused hearts were <20±5 pg/g wet weight. In 1 of 3 hearts this level was below the detection limit. The level of aldosterone in the coronary effluent during perfusion with 10 nmol/L aldosterone was 2161±87 pg/mL at 20 minutes and 2132±99 pg/mL at 25 minutes (P value was not significant; n=9), indicating that a steady state had been reached. The steady-state level in coronary effluent was 97±5% of the level in the perfusion buffer. After discontinuation of the aldosterone perfusion, aldosterone disappeared from the coronary effluent in a biphasic manner (n=6; Figure 3). The rapid phase had a half life (t
) of 1.1±0.1 minute, and the slow phase had a t
of 7.9±1.1 minute. The cardiac tissue level of aldosterone, immediately after the 10 nmol/L aldosterone perfusion had been switched off, was 2533±327 pg/g wet weight (n=3). During the washout phase, the tissue level decreased in a monophasic way, with a t
of 9.1±1.0 minutes (Figure 3). Eplerenone, at a concentration of 1 µmol/L, did not affect the steady-state tissue level reached after a 30-minute perfusion with 10 nmol/L aldosterone (3471±197 pg/g wet weight, n=3; P value not significant versus without eplerenone). This suggests that MR do not contribute to the accumulation of aldosterone in the heart. The cardiac tissue levels after a 30-minute perfusion with 3 or 30 nmol/L aldosterone were 982±207 and 6720±941 pg/g wet weight (n=3 for both), respectively. Tissue levels (expressed per gram of wet weight) closely correlated with coronary effluent levels (expressed per milliliter of effluent; r=0.81; P<0.01; Figure 4).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 orders of magnitude higher than the spironolactone concentration required to induce a similar effect,7,10 and thus, because the doses of both drugs are comparable, inotropic effects are less likely to occur during treatment with eplerenone than during treatment with spironolactone. Unlike spironolactone, eplerenone did not affect CF. Possibly, therefore, the spironolactone-induced effects on flow are mediated through a different receptor than its effects on contractility. The latter has been reported to involve increased myosin ATPase calcium sensitivity and diastolic calcium concentration.18 Eplerenone protected the heart during ischemia and reperfusion in a similar way as spironolactone,7 that is, both drugs reduced infarct size and improved LVP recovery (see Table and Figure 2). Therefore, this cardioprotective effect is most likely MR mediated. It could relate to blockade of the proarrhythmogenic actions of aldosterone3,19 and/or the aldosterone-induced increase in oxygen radical synthesis.20 The first possibility is particularly supported by the reduction of the fibrillation incidence by spironolactone (and the tendency for a similar reduction by eplerenone). If so, aldosterone was apparently still present in the isolated perfused rat Langendorff heart. The effect does not relate to the non-MR-mediated coronary constrictor effects of aldosterone.8,9
Aldosterone, at a concentration of 100 pmol/mL, did not additionally deteriorate the condition of the heart during the ischemia plus reperfusion procedure. Thus, the endogenous aldosterone levels in the heart were presumably <100 pmol/g, despite earlier reports by Silvestre et al11,21 describing such high aldosterone levels in the isolated perfused rat heart (50 to 500 pg/mg protein, or, because 1 g of tissue corresponds with 65 to 100 mg protein,13,22
10 to 150 pmol/g). Indeed, the cardiac tissue levels of aldosterone in our study were <20 pg/g. In some of our experiments, aldosterone was detectable in coronary effluent, obtained during the 30 minutes of perfusion with vehicle before the collection of the heart. Although this could reflect local synthesis of aldosterone,12 it might also represent washout of blood-derived aldosterone that had accumulated in the heart in vivo.
To study the kinetics of uptake and washout of circulating aldosterone in the heart, we perfused the rat Langendorff heart with aldosterone using concentrations corresponding with those in patients with severe heart failure.9,14,15 Aldosterone perfusion resulted in a rapid rise of the cardiac aldosterone levels, independent of MR. After 30 minutes, the tissue levels (expressed per gram of wet weight) were on average 1.5 times higher than the levels in coronary effluent (expressed per milliliter). Because the extracellular volume in this preparation is
0.6 mL/g,23,24 the cardiac aldosterone levels are 2 to 3 times higher than expected if the presence of aldosterone was limited to the extracellular fluid. Apparently, therefore, aldosterone accumulates in a compartment other than extracellular fluid, for example, it binds to cell surface receptors and/or reaches intracellular sites. In support of this concept, the washout of aldosterone after stopping the perfusion followed a biphasic pattern: a rapid phase corresponding with its disappearance from extracellular fluid23,25 and a slow phase corresponding with its washout from a second compartment. This pattern resembles that of cardiac renin, which accumulates in extracellular fluid and binds to membrane receptors.23,26,27
After perfusion of the Langendorff heart with aldosterone, the cardiac aldosterone levels correlated with the aldosterone levels in the perfusion buffer over a wide range, indicating a large capacity of the heart to accumulate aldosterone. Extrapolating this relationship to the plasma aldosterone levels in the rat (84 pg/mL) yields an in vivo cardiac tissue level of 1.5x84
125 pg/g, in full agreement with the cardiac tissue levels reported by others in rats on a normal salt diet.13,28 These levels are >6 times the level present after buffer perfusion. Apparently, the 15 minutes of equilibration plus 30 minutes of perfusion with aldosterone-free buffer before the collection of the heart were sufficient to wash away >85% of cardiac aldosterone. This is exactly what one would expect on the basis of a t
of
8 to 9 minutes for the aldosterone disappearance from tissue sites, and, thus, it can be concluded that, under normal circumstances, the majority of cardiac aldosterone, if not all, is taken up from the circulation. This does not exclude the possibility that local production of aldosterone becomes an important determinant of cardiac aldosterone levels under pathological conditions.29
Perspectives
The present study complements previous studies on the disappearance of cardiac aldosterone after adrenalectomy13,28 and simultaneously provides an explanation for the reduction in sudden death among patients taking MR antagonists.1,2 On the one hand, the heart displays a large capacity to accumulate aldosterone. This explains why cardiac aldosterone in rats overexpressing human renin and human angiotensinogen (>99% of which is derived from the adrenal gland) can be up to 10-fold higher than in serum.28 On the other hand, cardiac aldosterone disappears rapidly during perfusion with aldosterone-free buffer. This provides an explanation for the presence of aldosterone in the effluent of buffer-perfused hearts.12 The rapid, MR-independent kinetics of aldosterone observed in this study suggest that its cardiac accumulation involves cell surface binding rather than internalization followed by binding to intracellular MR. The cardioprotective effects of eplerenone during ischemia and reperfusion in the Langendorff preparation are most likely because of blockade of the MR-mediated arrhythmogenic effects3 of this cell surface-bound aldosterone.
Received November 11, 2005; first decision November 21, 2005; accepted December 13, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ohtani, M. Ohta, K. Yamamoto, T. Mano, Y. Sakata, M. Nishio, Y. Takeda, J. Yoshida, T. Miwa, M. Okamoto, et al. Elevated cardiac tissue level of aldosterone and mineralocorticoid receptor in diastolic heart failure: beneficial effects of mineralocorticoid receptor blocker Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): R946 - R954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |