| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2006;47:797.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (C.X., G.J., S.K.I.) and Ophthalmology (S.K.I.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (B.E.K.K., R.K., K.E.L.), University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.
Correspondence to Sudha K. Iyengar, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Wolstein Research Building, 1315, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106. E-mail ski{at}case.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: genetics arterioles veins microcirculation retinal vessels
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we performed a genome-wide linkage scan on retinal vessel diameters using data from the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Our specific aims were: (1) to study the underlying genetic factors influencing retinal vessel diameters, and (2) to study the differences between retinal vessel diameters (venules and arterioles) in terms of the genetic background. Given the association between retinal arteriolar narrowing and hypertension, stroke, and cardiovascular disease, understanding the genetic determinants of retinal vessel diameters may provide additional insights into the pathogenesis of these complex diseases.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 family members. Pedigrees containing
2 eligible participants, between which there was first-, second-, or third-degree relationships, were then constructed. A total of 602 pedigrees composed of 2783 eligible participants were constructed, of which 1762 persons from 486 families consisting of 812 sibling pairs had the measured retinal vessel diameter data available and, therefore, served as the subjects of the linkage study. The retinal vessel diameters of the other 1021 individuals were missing because: (1) their retinal vessel diameters were not measured, (2) they did not have measurable vessels, or (3) they did not have a direct relative with data; however, their retinal vessel diameters could be treated as missing at random, because there was no significant difference in terms of other phenotypes, such as blood pressure, height, and weight, and so forth (data now shown) between the 1762 individuals and the 1021 individuals.
Phenotypic Evaluation
Stereoscopic 30o color fundus retinal photographs, centered on the optic disc, were taken on both eyes of participants after dilation. The photographs for the right eyes were then converted to digital images by a high-resolution scanner (Nikon LS2000; Nikon Inc). A grader identified the arterioles and venules and then used a semiautomated procedure to measure the vessel diameters (3.8 µm per pixel) in the area between circles with a 0.5 and 1.0 standard disc diameter, which was a defined unit of measurement (1850 µm) established by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study,14 from the optic disc margin. The measurements for the arterioles were combined into a central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE), and the measurements for the venules were combined into a central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE), which were robust to variability of vessel number, independent of image scale, and easy to implement, using the formulae by Knudtson et al.15
As part of the baseline examination, blood pressure, height, and weight were measured. Information on medical history and lifestyle, including the use of antihypertensive medication, diabetes status, control of hyperglycemia, smoking, alcohol drinking, and sedentary lifestyle, was collected by a questionnaire. Blood specimens were obtained, on which a number of biochemical assays were performed.
Genotyping
For the genome scan, a total of 385 microsatellite markers on 22 autosomes, with an average marker distance of 9.14 cM, were typed by the Center for Inherited Disease Research (http://www.cidr.jhmi.edu/) using a modified version of the Weber panel 8 marker set. The genetic map and intermarker distances were from the Center for Inherited Disease Research database. Inconsistencies in the segregation of the genotypes within families were checked using the MARKERINFO program. Genotypes of markers showing Mendelian inconsistencies that could not be resolved during the relationship testing phase were set to missing for certain individuals. In total, 3.8% of the data were treated as missing. Before any linkage analysis, all of the family relationships were confirmed using the RELTEST program.16 Allele frequencies for each marker were established by maximum likelihood estimation using the FREQ program. The above programs are included in Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology (S.A.G.E.) software suite version 5.0.17
Statistical Analysis
For each phenotype (trait or covariate), we compared sex-specific differences by performing
2 goodness-of-fit tests. We then screened the covariates by regressing the CRAE or CRVE on the covariates using stepwise regression, as implemented in the SAS procedure REG. Covariates considered included sex, age (years), systolic blood pressure (SBP; mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP; mm Hg), blood pressure treatment (never, past, or current), dichotomized hypertension status conditional on blood pressure and treatment (yes or no; hypertension was defined as SBP
140 mm Hg, DBP
90 mm Hg, or use of antihypertensive medication), height (inches), weight (pounds), body mass index (kg/m2), diabetes status (yes or no), smoking (never, past, or current), alcohol drinking (never, past, or current), sedentary lifestyle (yes or no), total serum cholesterol (mg/dL), and serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL; mg/dL). Sex, age, and age2 were always retained in the model, as were other covariates that were significant at the level of 0.05.
The robustness of the power of the t test, which was used in the model-free quantitative trait linkage method of this article,18 in the presence of nonnormality, is not well guaranteed as the robustness of the type I error.19,20 Therefore, we performed commingling analyses for the covariate-adjusted traits using the program SEGREG implemented in S.A.G.E., during the process of which a Box-Cox power transformation was performed to simultaneously obtain normal and homoscedastic residuals.21
We estimated the narrow sense of heritability of traits using the program FCOR22 in S.A.G.E. Three sets of CRVE and CRAE were considered for the heritability estimation: (1) no covariates adjustment, (2) adjustment for significant covariates, and (3) Box-Cox power transformation after covariate adjustment.
Given the quantitative and complex characteristics of traits, we performed the model-free linkage analyses by using the HasemanElston regression, as implemented in the program SIBPAL.18 Specifically, we used a weighted combination of the squared sibling-pair trait difference and the squared sibling-pair mean-corrected trait sum as the dependent variable and regressed it on the estimated proportion of alleles shared identical by descent between sibling pairs. Single-point and multipoint identical by descent-sharing estimates were calculated by the program GENIBD. Both programs are included in S.A.G.E. software. All of the multipoint results that were nominally significant (P
0.01) were verified by comparing the nominal P values to those obtained from the null permutation distribution, using a sample of
100 000 replicate permutations of the allele-sharing data.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Box-Cox Transformation and Heritability Estimation
The commingling analyses found that the most parsimonious model for covariate-adjusted CRAE was the 2-mean dominant model and for covariate-adjusted CRVE, the 3-mean decreasing model. Specifically, the Box-Cox transformation of power (
1) equal to 2.5 for CRAE and equal to 1.8 for CRVE gave the best indication of genetic involvement under dominant and incompletely dominant models, respectively.
The estimated heritability for unadjusted, covariate-adjusted, and covariate-adjusted and power-transformed CRAE (±SE) was 0.60 (±0.13), 0.51 (±0.13), and 0.51 (±0.13), respectively. Similarly, the estimated heritability for unadjusted, covariate-adjusted, and covariate-adjusted and power-transformed CRVE (±SE) was 0.46 (±0.13), 0.48 (±0.13) and 0.49 (±0.13), respectively. All of the estimates were accompanied with small P values (<2.0x104). The results were not statistically different from those by Lee et al11 (P>0.4) and strongly indicated involvement of genetic effects on CRAE and CRVE.
Linkage Genome Scan
The linkage scan results for covariate-unadjusted traits and covariate-adjusted and power-transformed traits (data not shown) had similar trends in terms of linkage signal, although the signals usually slightly decreased after Box-Cox power transformation compared with the untransformed data. The Figure is illustrative of the linkage signal for CRAE on chromosome 3, which increased after covariate adjustment and then decreased after power transformation. Therefore, only the covariate-adjusted genome scan is presented (supplement Figures I and II, available online).
|
There were 7 regions on 5 chromosomes showing linkage signals at the nominal multipoint significance level of 0.01 for either covariate-unadjusted or -adjusted CRAE (Table 1). The strongest evidence for linkage was detected on chromosome 3q28 close to marker D3S2418 with a multipoint P value of 8.7x107 (empirical multipoint P value 1.2x104; single point P value 9.2x104) for covariate-adjusted CRAE. Compared with the signals for covariate-unadjusted CRAE, the signals on chromosomes 3q28, 5q35, 7q21, 7q32, 11q14, and 11q24 increased, whereas the signal on chromosome 18q11 remained unchanged.
|
There were 7 regions on 6 chromosomes showing linkage signals at the nominal multipoint significance level of 0.01 for either covariate-unadjusted or -adjusted CRVE (Table 1). The strongest evidence for linkage was detected on chromosome 8q21 close to marker D8S2324 with a multipoint P value of 5.8x104 (empirical multipoint P value 2.9x103; single point P value 5.2x103) for covariate-adjusted CRVE. The signal covered a relatively broad region and the 1-lod drop spanned
20 cM. Compared with the signals for covariate-unadjusted CRVE, the signals on chromosomes 1p36, 6p25, 6q14, and 8q13 increased slightly, whereas the signals on chromosomes 11p15, 13q34, and 14q21 slightly decreased given that all of the signals were significant at the level of 0.05.
CRVE and CRAE as measurements of retinal venule and arteriole diameters, respectively, not only had their own specific linkage signals, but also shared some common regions suggestive of linkage. These regions were located on chromosomes 1p36, 6p25, and 7q21, where both CRVE and CRAE showed multipoint linkage signals at the significance level of 0.05.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
For long time it had been believed that the differences between arteries and veins reflected only physiological influences, such as blood pressure, oxygenation, and shear forces, and the developing capillary networks were treated as a uniform structure. The remarkable work of Wang et al39 showed that arterial and venous endothelial cells are molecularly distinct from the earliest stages of angiogenesis and that reciprocal interactions between prespecified arterial and venous endothelial cells are necessary for angiogenesis. Therefore, the differences between arteries and veins are likely to be genetically determined in part, and the reciprocal signaling between these 2 types of vessels is crucial for the morphogenesis of capillary beds. In the present study, the linkage signals for CRAE and CRVE overlapped in some regions (1p36, 6p25, and 7q21), suggesting common genetic factors contributing to vessel diameters. Moreover, the signals were distinct in some regions (3q28, 5q35, 6q14, 7q32, 11p15, 11q14, 11q24, 14q21, and 17q11), suggesting genetically different determinants between CRAE and CRVE, the interaction between which is likely to be essential for developing both arteries and veins.
Linkage results must be replicated to be credible. However, this is the first report on the genetics of retinal vessel diameters, and the closest report to the current study is that of Wang et al,40 who detected a linkage signal at 13q33.3 when scanning for a macrovascular end point, carotid artery intima-media thickness, a subclinical measure of atherosclerosis. Given that generalized vessel narrowing may reflect intimal thickening, medial hyperplasia and hyalinization, and sclerosis of retinal vessels,41 the linkage signal in the same region for CRVE can be viewed as an independent replication. Although these results strongly suggest the existence of genetic contribution for retinal vessel diameters and related traits in this region, additional replications of our findings in different populations are needed.
Perspectives
This genome-wide linkage scan of retinal vessel diameters suggests a genetic contribution to retinal vessel characteristics and that the differences between arterioles and venules could, in part, be genetically determined. We were able to locate many potential candidate genes in the linked regions that are either associated with endothelial dysfunction or involved in the process of vasculogenesis. The majority of these genes are fairly well described in the literature; however, other attractive candidates not previously implicated in these pathways may also play a role. It may evoke additional fine mapping, candidate gene association studies, and interaction analyses on a larger scale, which will help to identify genes influencing retinal vessel development, in particular, in terms of diameters. Understanding the genetic determinants of retinal vessel diameters, as a window to microvascular systems elsewhere in the body, may provide insight into the pathogenesis of complex diseases, such as hypertension and cardiovascular disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 27, 2005; first decision October 13, 2005; accepted January 14, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Sharrett AR, Hubbard LD, Cooper LS, Sorlie PD, Brothers RJ, Nieto FJ, Pinsky JL, Klein R. Retinal arteriolar diameters and elevated blood pressure: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 150: 263270.
3. Wong TY, Hubbard LD, Klein R, Marino EK, Kronmal R, Sharrett AR, Siscovick DS, Burke G, Tielsch JM. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and blood pressure in older people: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86: 10071013.
4. Leung H, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Tan AG, Wong TY, Klein R, Hubbard LD, Mitchell P. Relationships between age, blood pressure, and retinal vessel diameters in an older population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 29002904.
5. Wong TY, Klein R, Klein BE, Meuer SM, Hubbard LD. Retinal vessel diameters and their associations with age and blood pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 46444650.
6. Wong TY, Klein R, Sharrett AR, Duncan BB, Couper DJ, Klein BE, Hubbard LD, Nieto FJ. Retinal arteriolar diameter and risk for hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140: 248255.
7. Smith W, Wang JJ, Wong TY, Rochtchina E, Klein R, Leeder SR, Mitchell P. Retinal arteriolar narrowing is associated with 5-year incident severe hypertension: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 442447.
8. Wong TY, Klein R, Couper DJ, Cooper LS, Shahar E, Hubbard LD, Wofford MR, Sharrett AR. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and incident stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Lancet. 2001; 358: 11341140.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Wong TY, Klein R, Nieto FJ, Klein BE, Sharrett AR, Meuer SM, Hubbard LD, Tielsch JM. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and 10-year cardiovascular mortality: a population-based case-control study. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110: 933940.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Wong TY, Klein R, Sharrett AR, Duncan BB, Couper DJ, Tielsch JM, Klein BE, Hubbard LD. Retinal arteriolar narrowing and risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. JAMA. 2002; 287: 11531159.
11. Lee KE, Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson MD. Familial aggregation of retinal vessel caliber in the beaver dam eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45: 39293933.
12. Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL, De Mets DL. The Beaver Dam Eye Study: visual acuity. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98: 13101315.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Linton KL, Klein BE, Klein R. The validity of self-reported and surrogate-reported cataract and age-related macular degeneration in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 134: 14381446.
14. Rice TA. The early treatment diabetic retinopathy study. Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1982; 35: 2430.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Hubbard LD, Wong TY, Klein R, Klein BE. Revised formulas for summarizing retinal vessel diameters. Curr Eye Res. 2003; 27: 143149.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Olson JM. Relationship estimation by Markov-process models in a sib-pair linkage study. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 64: 14641472.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. S.A.G.E. Statistical analysis for genetic epidemiology [computer program]. Version 5.0 2005. Available at: http://darwin.case.edu/sage. Accessed March 2005.
18. Shete S, Jacobs KB, Elston RC. Adding further power to the Haseman and Elston method for detecting linkage in larger sibships: weighting sums and differences. Hum Hered. 2003; 55: 7985.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Miller RG. Beyond ANOVA, Basics of Applied Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1986.
20. Feingold E. Regression-based quantitative-trait-locus mapping in the 21st century. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 71: 217222.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Box G, Cox D. An analysis of transformations (with discussions). J R Stat Soc B. 1964; 26: 211254.
22. Keen KJ, Elston RC. Robust asymptotic sampling theory for correlations in pedigrees. Stat Med. 2003; 22: 32293247.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Goldstein IM, Ostwald P, Roth S. Nitric oxide: a review of its role in retinal function and disease. Vision Res. 1996; 36: 29792994.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Klein R, Sharrett AR, Klein BE, Chambless LE, Cooper LS, Hubbard LD, Evans G. Are retinal arteriolar abnormalities related to atherosclerosis?: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 16441650.
25. Liu S, Premont RT, Kontos CD, Huang J, Rockey DC. Endothelin-1 activates endothelial cell nitric-oxide synthase via heterotrimeric G-protein ß
subunit signaling to protein jinase B/Akt. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 4992949935.
26. Wang XQ, Vaziri ND. Erythropoietin depresses nitric oxide synthase expression by human endothelial cells. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 894899.
27. Uruno A, Sugawara A, Kanatsuka H, Arima S, Taniyama Y, Kudo M, Takeuchi K, Ito S. Hepatocyte growth factor stimulates nitric oxide production through endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway and possibly by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in vascular endothelial cells. Hypertens Res. 2004; 27: 887895.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Vecchione C, Maffei A, Colella S, Aretini A, Poulet R, Frati G, Gentile MT, Fratta L, Trimarco V, Trimarco B, Lembo G. Leptin effect on endothelial nitric oxide is mediated through Akt-endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation pathway. Diabetes. 2002; 51: 168173.
29. Babaei S, Teichert-Kuliszewska K, Zhang Q, Jones N, Dumont DJ, Stewart DJ. Angiogenic actions of angiopoietin-1 require endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Am J Pathol. 2003; 162: 19271936.
30. Silvestre JS, Tamarat R, Ebrahimian TG, Le-Roux A, Clergue M, Emmanuel F, Duriez M, Schwartz B, Branellec D, Levy BI. Vascular endothelial growth factor-B promotes in vivo angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 114123.
31. Kimura H, Esumi H. Reciprocal regulation between nitric oxide and vascular endothelial growth factor in angiogenesis. Acta Biochim Pol. 2003; 50: 4959.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Funke-Kaiser H, Reichenberger F, Kopke K, Herrmann SM, Pfeifer J, Orzechowski HD, Zidek W, Paul M, Brand E. Differential binding of transcription factor E2F-2 to the endothelin-converting enzyme-1b promoter affects blood pressure regulation. Hum Mol Genet. 2003; 12: 423433.
33. Givens RC, Lin YS, Dowling AL, Thummel KE, Lamba JK, Schuetz EG, Stewart PW, Watkins PB. CYP3A5 genotype predicts renal CYP3A activity and blood pressure in healthy adults. J Appl Physiol. 2003; 95: 12971300.
34. Watson B Jr, Nowak NJ, Myracle AD, Shows TB, Warnock DG. The human angiotensinase C gene (HUMPCP) maps to 11q14 within 700 kb of D11S901: a candidate gene for essential hypertension. Genomics. 1997; 44: 365367.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Von WF, Bengtsson K, Lindgren CM, Orho-Melander M, Fyhrquist F, Lindblad U, Rastam L, Forsblom C, Kanninen T, Almgren P, Burri P, Katzman P, Groop L, Hulthen UL, Melander O. A genome wide scan for early onset primary hypertension in Scandinavians. Hum Mol Genet. 2003; 12: 20772081.
36. Rutherford S, Johnson MP, Curtain RP, Griffiths LR. Chromosome 17 and the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene in human essential hypertension. Hum Genet. 2001; 109: 408415.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Knight J, Munroe PB, Pembroke JC, Caulfield MJ. Human chromosome 17 in essential hypertension. Ann Hum Genet. 2003; 67: 193206.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Humphries SE, Martin S, Cooper J, Miller G. Interaction between smoking and the stromelysin-1 (MMP3) gene 5A/6A promoter polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease in healthy men. Ann Hum Genet. 2002; 66: 343352.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Wang HU, Chen ZF, Anderson DJ. Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4. Cell. 1998; 93: 741753.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Wang D, Yang H, Quinones MJ, Bulnes-Enriquez I, Jimenez X, De La RR, Modilevsky T, Yu K, Li Y, Taylor KD, Hsueh WA, Hodis HN, Rotter JI. A genome-wide scan for carotid artery intima-media thickness: the Mexican-Am Coronary Artery Disease family study. Stroke. 2005; 36: 540545.
41. Wong TY, Klein R, Klein BE, Tielsch JM, Hubbard L, Nieto FJ. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and their relationship with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 46: 5980.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Hypertension 2006 47: 644-645.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Sun, G. Zhu, T. Y. Wong, A. W. Hewitt, J. B. Ruddle, L. Hodgson, G. W. Montgomery, T. L. Young, C. J. Hammond, J. E. Craig, et al. Quantitative Genetic Analysis of the Retinal Vascular Caliber: The Australian Twins Eye Study Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 788 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liew, J. J. Wang, P. Mitchell, and T. Y. Wong Retinal Vascular Imaging: A New Tool in Microvascular Disease Research Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, September 1, 2008; 1(2): 156 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Wang, E. Rochtchina, G. Liew, A. G. Tan, T. Y. Wong, S. R. Leeder, W. Smith, A. Shankar, and P. Mitchell The Long-term Relation among Retinal Arteriolar Narrowing, Blood Pressure, and Incident Severe Hypertension Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2008; 168(1): 80 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sun, G. Liew, J. J. Wang, P. Mitchell, S. M. Saw, T. Aung, E. S. Tai, and T. Y. Wong Retinal Vascular Caliber, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in an Asian Population: The Singapore Malay Eye Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 1784 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Rochtchina, J. J. Wang, B. Taylor, T. Y. Wong, and P. Mitchell Ethnic Variability in Retinal Vessel Caliber: A Potential Source of Measurement Error from Ocular Pigmentation?--The Sydney Childhood Eye Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 1362 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liew, J. J. Wang, B. B. Duncan, R. Klein, A. R. Sharrett, F. Brancati, H.-C. Yeh, P. Mitchell, T. Y. Wong, and for the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Low Birthweight Is Associated With Narrower Arterioles in Adults Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 933 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. T. Nguyen, J. J. Wang, and T. Y. Wong Retinal Vascular Changes in Pre-Diabetes and Prehypertension: New findings and their research and clinical implications Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2708 - 2715. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Wang, G. Liew, R. Klein, E. Rochtchina, M. D. Knudtson, B. E.K. Klein, T. Y. Wong, G. Burlutsky, and P. Mitchell Retinal vessel diameter and cardiovascular mortality: pooled data analysis from two older populations Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2007; 28(16): 1984 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. de Jong, M. K. Ikram, D. D. G. Despriet, A. G. Uitterlinden, A. Hofman, M. M. B. Breteler, and P. T. V. M. de Jong Complement Factor H Polymorphism, Inflammatory Mediators, and Retinal Vessel Diameters: The Rotterdam Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3014 - 3018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Hewitt, J. P. Poulsen, W. L. M. Alward, S. L. Bennett, W. M. Budde, R. L. Cooper, J. E. Craig, J. H. Fingert, P. J. Foster, D. F. Garway-Heath, et al. Heritable Features of the Optic Disc: A Novel Twin Method for Determining Genetic Significance Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2469 - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liew, A. Shankar, J. J. Wang, R. Klein, M. S. Bray, D. J. Couper, A. R. Sharrett, and T. Y. Wong Apolipoprotein E Gene Polymorphisms and Retinal Vascular Signs: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 2007; 125(6): 813 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Wang and T. Y. Wong Genetic Determinants of Retinal Vascular Caliber: Additional Insights Into Hypertension Pathogenesis Hypertension, April 1, 2006; 47(4): 644 - 645. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |