| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2006;47:1101.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Nephrology and Hypertension (J.T., K.B., R.L., R.V., K.-U.E., K.F.H.), Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany; Charité Campus Buch (F.C.L.), Franz Volhard Clinic, HELIOS Klinikum-Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany; Institute of Biochemistry (P.D.), Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Federal Research Centre for Nutrition and Food (H.W.), Kulmbach, Germany.
Correspondence to Jens Titze, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Loschgestr. 8, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. E-mail jens.titze{at}rzmail.uni-erlangen.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: electrolytes gender water-electrolyte balance hypertension, sodium-dependent
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ashing Procedure
The skins, carcasses, and muscles were weighed [wet weight (WW)], then desiccated at 90°C for 72 hours [dry weight (DW)]. Because weights were unchanged with further drying, the difference between WW and DW was considered as tissue water content. The tissues were then ashed at 190° and 450°C for 24 hours at each temperature level, and the bones were sieved from the carcass ashes. The separated tissues were further ashed at 600°C for 48 hours and then dissolved in 10% HNO3. Na+ and K+ concentration were measured by flame photometry (Model 3100, Perkin Elmer).
Data Analysis
Data are expressed as average±SD. Data from the various tissues Na+, K+, and water content were analyzed by multivariate analysis (general linear model). Post hoc tests were performed with the Bonferroni algorithm. The amount of osmotically active, osmotically inactive, and osmotically neutral Na+ accumulation was investigated from the relationship between changes of Na+ content and alterations of water content in total body, skin, bone, and rest carcass as described in detail in the online supplement available at http://www.hypertensionaha.org. We used SPSS software for statistical analysis (version 12.0).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
DOCA increased the rTBNa+, whereas DOCA salt increased this value further, leading to an &40% TBNa+ excess compared with the controls. DOCA-OVX salt led to similar rTBNa+ excess that was not different from the DOCA salt group. Total body K+ (rTBK+) was not different between controls and the DOCA-alone group with both diets. The rTBK+ was not different between DOCA and DOCA-OVX rats given high salt. The Na+ and K+ content in the skinned and bone-removed carcasses showed pattern changes similar to rTBNa+ and rTBK+. Despite the massive increases in TBNa+, we found only moderate increases in the total body water content [(rTBW) all given as %WW] in DOCA salt rats. Salt increased rTBW in DOCA rats and increased rTBW further in DOCA-OVX rats, whereas no significant increases were observed in the controls. The relationship between rTBNa+ and rTBW was steep in control rats (Figure 1A). In rats receiving DOCA, this relationship had a flatter slope, indicating water-free Na+ retention. In DOCA-OVX rats, the relationship between rTBNa+ and rTBW was shifted right compared with the controls and left from intact DOCA-treated rats. This finding implies that the capacity to accumulate Na+ without water retention was reduced in DOCA-OVX rats.
|
To quantify the differences in water-free Na+ retention capacity, we calculated the relationships (ratios) between Na+, K+, and the sum of the 2 cations (total effective osmolytes) with water in the tissues (Table 2). With DOCA, an increase in the ratio of TBNa+ per total body water was observed that increased further with DOCA salt, indicating water-free Na+ retention. Compared with intact rats, OVX decreased the TBNa+:water ratio in DOCA-treated rats (0.098±0.010 versus 0.106±0.009; P<0.05). DOCA-OVX decreased the ratio of TBNa+ per total body water back to the control level, whereas DOCA-OVX salt increased TBNa+ per total body water.
|
We then quantified the absolute effect of DOCA salt and DOCA-OVX salt treatment on Na+ gain by calculating the contribution of osmotically active Na+ accumulation, osmotically inactive Na+ retention, and osmotically neutral Na+ retention (see online supplement for calculations). In the DOCA salt group, water-free TBNa+ gain relative to water was 3.18 mmol of which 1.41 mmol were balanced by rest carcass K+ losses. These relationships resulted in 1.77 mmol osmotically inactive Na+ storage in DOCA salt rats (Figure 2). Osmotically inactive Na+ storage occurred in the completely skinned and bone-removed rest carcasses and the skin, whereas the bone lost both Na+ and K+ relative to water in DOCA salt rats (Figure I, available online). The amount of osmotically active Na+ was 0.82 mmol in DOCA salt rats. In the DOCA-OVX salt group, TBNa+ gain relative to water was 2.57 mmol, of which 2.14 mmol were balanced by rest carcass K+ losses. These relationships resulted in 0.43 mmol of osmotically inactive Na+ storage in DOCA-OVX salt rats. This marked reduction in the osmotically inactive Na+ storage capacity in DOCA-OVX salt rats compared with intact DOCA salt rats was because of reduced Na+ storage in the rest carcass and a total loss of the skin Na+ storage capacity (Figure I). Similar to intact rats, DOCA-OVX rats lost bone Na+ and K+ relative to water. The amount of osmotically active Na+ retention was 1.51 mmol in DOCA-OVX salt rats.
|
Thus, &80% of the Na+ gained in DOCA salt rats was either osmotically inactive or neutral (balanced by K+ loss) and could not have contributed to volume expansion (Figure 2). In DOCA-OVX salt rats, only &63% of the Na+ load was accumulated water free, whereas &37% were osmotically active. The reduced osmotically inactive Na+ storage capacity in DOCA-OVX rats was only partially compensated by water-free Na+ retention via osmotically neutral Na+/K+ exchange and, hence, led to augmented volume retention, despite similar Na+ accumulation in DOCA-OVX rats. Compared with control rats, DOCA salt rats accumulated 4.0 mmol Na+ (Figure 2). According to their serum Na+ and K+ concentration, this degree of Na+ accumulation should lead to 27-mL volume retention. We detected only 5-mL volume retention. DOCA-OVX salt rats accumulated 4.1 mmol of Na+. This degree of Na+ accumulation should lead to 28-mL volume retention. However, a 10-mL volume increase was observed. Thus, the compensatory increases in osmotically neutral Na+/K+ exchange could not rescue DOCA-OVX salt rats from augmented volume retention, despite similar Na+ retention compared with DOCA salt rats. This reduced osmotically inactive Na+ storage capacity, thus, led to augmented water retention despite similar Na+ retention in DOCA-OVX salt rats.
DOCA increased MAP even with low salt; high salt increased MAP further. This salt-sensitive blood pressure increase was exaggerated in the DOCA-OVX group (Table 1). We investigated the relationship between the total body fluid volume and MAP (mm Hg) in the rats (Figure 1B). In control rats, high salt did not increase rTBW or MAP, and we found no correlation between rTBW and MAP. In DOCA rats and DOCA-OVX rats, high salt increased both rTBW and MAP; however, rTBW and MAP were not correlated in DOCA salt rats, suggesting that rTBW increases did not invariably increase MAP. Furthermore, MAP in DOCA salt rats and DOCA-OVX salt rats was higher than in control rats with similar total body water content (Figure 1B), suggesting that volume-independent aspects largely contributed to salt-sensitive hypertension in both DOCA salt and DOCA-OVX rats. We quantified the relationship between rTBW and MAP (Table 2). The increase in MAP to a 1% increase in rTBW was higher in DOCA rats than in the controls and increased further with DOCA salt. DOCA-OVX salt led to similar increases in the MAP-to-volume response that were not significantly different from intact DOCA salt rats. To address volume sensitivity in more detail in DOCA salt and DOCA-OVX salt rats, we investigated the
MAP/
rTBW in these groups (Figure 3). Average
MAP/
rTBW was not different between DOCA salt and DOCA-OVX salt rats (21.20±17.80 versus 13.87±6.23; P>0.1). However, increasing rTBW decreased
MAP/
rTBW in DOCA salt rats, suggesting that volume sensitivity was decreased in the rats with increasing body water content to maintain blood pressure. This inverse relationship between
MAP/
rTBW and rTBW was perturbed in DOCA-OVX salt rats.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Even without unilateral nephrectomy, our model led to a failure in balance sensitivity. DOCA rats fed an 8% NaCl diet accumulated 4 mmol of Na+. In contrast to favored concepts of Na+ retention, this TBNa+ excess was largely compensated at the level of osmosensitivity; &80% of the sodium retention was water free. According to the traditional concept of extracellular osmotically active osmolyte retention, this Na+ load should lead to 27 mL of water retention. However, only 5 mL of water retention occurred, indicating that only 20% of the Na+ load accumulated was osmotically active. The last 80% of
TBNa+ were accumulated water free either by osmotically inactive Na+ storage or by osmotically neutral Na+/K+ exchange. Water-free Na+ retention, thus, "buffered" the osmolyte load and rescued the rats from an 11% rTBW increase. However, although rTBW was maintained close to normal, DOCA salt rats increased blood pressure by 34 mm Hg compared with the controls. This blood pressure increase was most likely because of increased volume sensitivity of the cardiovascular system, because blood pressure was considerably higher at a given total body water content in DOCA salt rats compared with untreated controls. We imply that salt-sensitive hypertension does not primarily come about by volume-related mechanisms. Other than the renal body fluid feedback control, extrarenal body fluid regulation must play a substantial role in volume and, hence, blood pressure homeostasis in the DOCA salt model. However, because cardiovascular volume sensitivity decreased with increasing total body water content (Figure 3), we cannot precisely quantify the relative volume-dependent and volume-independent contributions to hypertension or the net-buffering effect of water-free Na+ retention on blood pressure.
Compared with DOCA salt rats, DOCA-OVX salt rats further increased blood pressure by 19 mm Hg, although Na+ retention (balance sensitivity) and the blood pressure:volume reaction (volume sensitivity) was not significantly different between intact and OVX rats. The major difference between DOCA salt rats and DOCA-OVX salt rats was found at the level of osmosensitivity. OVX reduced the osmotically inactive Na+ storage capacity in the rats, which increased volume retention despite similar Na+ retention. This finding is in line with previous experiments, where we demonstrated that OVX led to skin Na+ storage incapacity in rats without mineralocorticoid excess.10 However, the loss in Na+ storage capacity was not enough to cause a salt-sensitive blood pressure increase in untreated OVX Sprague-Dawley rats. We, thus, combined OVX and DOCA salt in this present experiment. Whereas DOCA salt rats buffered &80% of their TBNa+ excess by water-free Na+ retention, because of their loss of osmotically inactive Na+ storage capacity, DOCA-OVX salt rats accumulated only &67% of the retained Na+ load as water free. Because we found no significant differences between DOCA salt and DOCA-OVX salt rats at the level of balance sensitivity and/or volume sensitivity, we conclude that the loss in osmotically inactive Na+ storage capacity and the consecutive volume excess accounted for the additional 19-mm Hg blood pressure increase that was observed in DOCA-OVX salt rats.
Our findings do not necessarily contradict the findings of other investigators. The concept of renal-body fluid blood pressure feedback control in mineralocorticoid excess is based on the finding that initial Na+ and volume retention increases blood pressure. The resulting increase in natriuresis establishes a new steady state at increased body Na+ and water content at the expense of hypertension suggests an initial failure in balance sensitivity.11 Other investigators showed earlier that DOCA salt increases blood pressure by increasing sympathetic nerve activity, which should increase the cardiovascular sensitivity to volume.8 Observations from DOCA salt mice that the blood pressure increase is caused by increased peripheral vascular resistance, rather than increased cardiac output with subsequent readjustments,12 as well as the finding that venomotor tone is increased in DOCA salt rats,13 underscore the role of cardiovascular volume sensitivity in DOCA salt hypertension.
In this study, we draw attention to osmosensitivity, which can be viewed as an additional regulatory level of salt sensitivity in the DOCA salt model. The current understanding implies that Na+ retention invariably leads to extracellular water retention, because Na+ is the major cation of the extracellular space and acts to hold the extracellular volume by its osmotic activity. However, findings from long-term experiments in humans1418 and animals9,19,20 suggest that Na+ might be accumulated without accompanying water retention, either by osmotically neutral Na+/K+ exchange or by osmotically inactive Na+ storage. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the relationship between the internal balance of TBNa+ and K+ content, total body water content, and blood pressure in the DOCA salt model. We showed that a volume-buffering effect contained the blood pressure. The concept that osmosensitivity is an important regulatory level of salt sensitivity is underscored by our findings in DOCA-OVX salt rats, where we found no significant differences at the level of balance sensitivity and volume sensitivity but instead found major differences in the osmotically inactive Na+ storage capacity in OVX rats. We, thus, conclude that the loss of Na+ storage capacity and the consecutive increase in total body volume were responsible for the further blood pressure increase in this model of postmenopausal salt-sensitive hypertension.
Estradiol effects may decrease sympathetic nerve activity2123 and peripheral vascular resistance.2427 Female sex hormones may also influence internal Na+ balance by modulating osmotically inactive Na+ storage and thereby determining osmosensitivity of the organism during Na+ loading. We suggest that, in addition to the role of the kidney in the renal-body fluid feedback control system, extrarenal volume regulation by osmotically inactive Na+ storage and/or osmotically neutral Na+/K+ exchange also impact on long-term volume and blood pressure control, especially in postmenopausal salt-sensitive hypertension. We are aware that additional studies, including OVX with hormone replacement, must be performed, addressing these issues. Finally, we believe that our notion of water-free Na+ retention receives support from a recent study in marathon runners and elite athletes.28 Perturbations of the serum Na+ concentration in these athletes could be largely explained by osmotically inactive Na+ storage or failure to remove Na+ from osmotically inactive Na+ reservoirs.
Perspectives
In DOCA salt rats, the skin functions as an osmotically inactive Na+ reservoir, and the muscle acts as an osmotically neutral Na+/K+ exchanger.9 The molecular mechanisms of Na+ storage and Na+/K+ exchange are unclear but may involve proteoglycans.20 Moreover, how salt increases volume sensitivity in the organism is unclear. Possibly, neurons act as Na+/K+ exchangers during TBNa+ excess. Osmotically neutral Na+/K+ exchange might activate sympathetic neurons and thereby lead to hypertension without significant changes in total body fluid balance. Central nervous system osmoreceptors and Na+ sensors play a pivotal role in translating salt retention into central sympathetic nervous system activation.2932 Our model may facilitate new research avenues for salt-sensitive hypertension.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 29, 2005; first decision December 21, 2005; accepted March 27, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Rose BD. Regulation of Water and Electrolyte Balance. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1994.
3. Walser M. Phenomenological analysis of electrolyte homeostasis. In: Seldin D.W. Giebisch G, ed. The Kidney: Physiology and Pathophysiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press, Ltd.; 1992; 3144.
4. Hall JE, Brands MW. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems: renal mechanisms and circulatory homeostasis. In: Seldin D.W. Giebisch G, ed. The Kidney. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000; 10091045.
5. Grekin RJ, Terris JM, Bohr DF. Electrolyte and hormonal effects of deoxycorticosterone acetate in young pigs. Hypertension. 1980; 2: 326332.
6. Ballermann BJ, Bloch KD, Seidman JG, Brenner BM. Atrial natriuretic peptide transcription, secretion, and glomerular receptor activity during mineralocorticoid escape in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1986; 78: 840843.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Hall JE, Granger JP, Smith MJ Jr, Premen AJ. Role of renal hemodynamics and arterial pressure in aldosterone "escape". Hypertension. 1984; 6: 183192.
8. Katholi RE, Naftilan AJ, Oparil S. Importance of renal sympathetic tone in the development of DOCAsalt hypertension in the rat. Hypertension. 1980; 2: 266273.
9. Titze J, Bauer K, Schafflhuber M, Dietsch P, Lang R, Schwind KH, Luft FC, Eckardt KU, Hilgers KF. Internal sodium balance in DOCA-salt rats: a body composition study. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005; 289: F793F802.
10. Titze J, Lang R, Ilies C, Schwind KH, Kirsch KA, Dietsch P, Luft FC, Hilgers KF. Osmotically inactive skin Na+ storage in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003; 285: F1108F1117.
11. Hall JE, Granger JP, Hester RL, Coleman TG, Smith MJ Jr, Cross RB. Mechanisms of escape from sodium retention during angiotensin II hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1984; 246: F627F634.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Obst M, Gross V, Luft FC. Systemic hemodynamics in non-anesthetized L-NAME- and DOCA-salt-treated mice. J Hypertens. 2004; 22: 18891894.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Fink GD, Johnson RJ, Galligan JJ. Mechanisms of increased venous smooth muscle tone in desoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertension. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 464469.
14. Garnett ES, Ford J, Golding PL, Mardell RJ, Whyman AE. The mobilizaton of osmotically inactive sodium during total starvation in man. Clin Sci. 1968; 35: 93103.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Heer M, Baisch F, Kropp J, Gerzer R, Drummer C. High dietary sodium chloride consumption may not induce body fluid retention in humans. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000; 278: 585595.
16. Titze J, Maillet A, Lang R, Gunga HC, Johannes B, Gauquelin-Koch G, Kihm E, Larina I, Gharib C, Kirsch KA. Long-term sodium balance in humans in a terrestrial space station simulation study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 40: 508516.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Palacios C, Wigertz K, Martin BR, Jackman L, Pratt JH, Peacock M, McCabe G, Weaver CM. Sodium retention in black and white female adolescents in response to salt intake. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89: 18581863.
18. Farber SJ, Soberman RJ. Total body water and total exchangeable sodium in edematous states due to cardiac, renal or hepatic disease. J Clin Invest. 1956; 35: 779791.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Farber SJ, Schubert M, Schuster N. The binding of cations by chondroitin sulfate. J Clin Invest. 1957; 36: 17151722.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Titze J, Shakibaei M, Schafflhuber M, Schulze-Tanzil G, Porst M, Schwind KH, Dietsch P, Hilgers KF. Glycosaminoglycan polymerization may enable osmotically inactive Na+ storage in the skin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 22: 803810.
21. Fang Z, Carlson SH, Chen YF, Oparil S, Wyss JM. Estrogen depletion induces NaCl-sensitive hypertension in female spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001; 281: R1934F1939.
22. Hunt BE, Taylor JA, Hamner JW, Gagnon M, Lipsitz LA. Estrogen replacement therapy improves baroreflex regulation of vascular sympathetic outflow in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 2001; 103: 29092914.
23. Sudhir K, Elser MD, Jennings GL, Komesaroff PA. Estrogen supplementation decreases norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction and total body norepinephrine spillover in perimenopausal women. Hypertension. 1997; 30: 15381543.
24. Caulin-Glaser T, Garcia-Cardena G, Sarrel P, Sessa WC, Bender JR. 17 ß-estradiol regulation of human endothelial cell basal nitric oxide release, independent of cytosolic Ca2+ mobilization. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 885892.
25. Chen Z, Yuhanna IS, Galcheva-Gargova Z, Karas RH, Mendelsohn ME, Shaul PW. Estrogen receptor
mediates the nongenomic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by estrogen. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 401406.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26. White RE, Darkow DJ, Lang JL. Estrogen relaxes coronary arteries by opening BKCa channels through a cGMP-dependent mechanism. Circ Res. 1995; 77: 936942.
27. Ylikorkala O, Orpana A, Puolakka J, Pyorala T, Viinikka L. Postmenopausal hormonal replacement decreases plasma levels of endothelin-1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995; 80: 33843387.[Abstract]
28. Noakes TD, Sharwood K, Speedy D, Hew T, Reid S, Dugas J, Almond C, Wharam P, Weschler L. Three independent biological mechanisms cause exercise-associated hyponatremia: evidence from 2135 weighed competitive athletic performances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 1855018555.
29. Gomez-Sanchez EP. Hypertension and the mineralocorticoid receptor in the brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994; 746: 415417.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Gomez-Sanchez EP, Gomez-Sanchez CE. Effect of central infusion of benzamil on Dahl S rat hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1995; 269: H1044H1047.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Huang BS, Leenen FH. Blockade of brain mineralocorticoid receptors or Na+ channels prevents sympathetic hyperactivity and improves cardiac function in rats post-MI. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 288: H2491H2497.
32. Keep RF, Si X, Shakui P, Ennis SR, Betz AL. Effect of amiloride analogs on DOCA-salt-induced hypertension in rats. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: H2215H2220.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. J. Rabelink and J. I. Rotmans Salt is getting under our skin Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 3282 - 3283. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ziomber, A. Machnik, A. Dahlmann, P. Dietsch, F.-X. Beck, H. Wagner, K. F. Hilgers, F. C. Luft, K.-U. Eckardt, and J. Titze Sodium-, potassium-, chloride-, and bicarbonate-related effects on blood pressure and electrolyte homeostasis in deoxycorticosterone acetate-treated rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): F1752 - F1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Karatas, B. Hegner, L. J. de Windt, F. C. Luft, C. Schubert, V. Gross, Y. J. Akashi, D. Gurgen, U. Kintscher, A. C. da Costa Goncalves, et al. Deoxycorticosterone Acetate-Salt Mice Exhibit Blood Pressure-Independent Sexual Dimorphism Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 1177 - 1183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. F. Santos and A. J. Peixoto Revisiting the Dialysate Sodium Prescription as a Tool for Better Blood Pressure and Interdialytic Weight Gain Management in Hemodialysis Patients Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 522 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Bailey, J. M. Paterson, P. W.F. Hadoke, N. Wrobel, C. O.C. Bellamy, D. G. Brownstein, J. R. Seckl, and J. J. Mullins A Switch in the Mechanism of Hypertension in the Syndrome of Apparent Mineralocorticoid Excess J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 47 - 58. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schafflhuber, N. Volpi, A. Dahlmann, K. F. Hilgers, F. Maccari, P. Dietsch, H. Wagner, F. C. Luft, K.-U. Eckardt, and J. Titze Mobilization of osmotically inactive Na+ by growth and by dietary salt restriction in rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): F1490 - F1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Brooks, K. L. Freeman, and Y. Qi Time course of synergistic interaction between DOCA and salt on blood pressure: roles of vasopressin and hepatic osmoreceptors Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): R1825 - R1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. King and G. D. Fink Chronic Low-Dose Angiotensin II Infusion Increases Venomotor Tone by Neurogenic Mechanisms Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 927 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |