Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2006;48:127-133
Published online before print May 22, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000224296.96235.dd
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/1/127    most recent
01.HYP.0000224296.96235.ddv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation

(Hypertension. 2006;48:127.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

11ß-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 Activity in Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus Modulates Sympathetic Excitation

Zhi-Hua Zhang; Yu-Ming Kang; Yang Yu; Shun-Guang Wei; Thomas J. Schmidt; Alan Kim Johnson; Robert B. Felder

From the Departments of Internal Medicine (Z.-H.Z., Y.-M.K., Y.Y., S.-G.W., R.B.F.), Physiology and Biophysics (T.J.S.), and Psychology (A.K.J.), Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center (R.B.F.), Iowa City, Iowa.

Correspondence to Robert B. Felder, MD, University of Iowa College of Medicine, E318-GH, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail robert-felder{at}uiowa.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Aldosterone stimulates the sympathetic nervous system by binding to a select population of brain mineralocorticoid receptors (MR). These MR have an equal affinity for corticosterone that is present in substantially higher concentrations, but are held in reserve for aldosterone by activity of the enzyme 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11ß-HSD-2), which converts corticosterone to an inactive metabolite. Thus, colocalization of MR and 11ß-HSD-2 activity may help identify brain regions that mediate the effects of aldosterone. The present studies tested the hypothesis that 11ß-HSD-2 activity regulates MR-mediated responses in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, a forebrain region implicated in sympathetic regulation. Real-time–polymerase chain reaction revealed the presence of 11ß-HSD-2 mRNA in PVN. In anesthetized adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, microinjection of the 11ß-HSD-2 inhibitor carbenoxolone (CBX) into PVN increased mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and renal sympathetic nerve activity. Intracerebroventricular injections of CBX excited PVN neurons and increased mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and renal sympathetic nerve activity. The ability of CBX to increase sympathetic activity by inhibiting 11ß-HSD-2, thereby permitting corticosterone to activate MR, was confirmed by the following: Intracerebroventricular glycyrrhizic acid, another 11ß-HSD-2 inhibitor, mimicked the sympathoexcitatory effects of CBX; the sympathoexcitatory effects of CBX were blocked by spironolactone, a MR antagonist. Neither CBX nor glycyrrhizic acid elicited a response in adrenalectomized rats. These findings suggest that MR in PVN contribute to sympathetic regulation and may be activated by aldosterone or corticosterone (or cortisol in humans) depending on the state of 11ß-HSD-2 activity.


Key Words: aldosterone • corticosterone • brain


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Selective antagonism of mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with established heart failure1 or with reduced left ventricular function following acute myocardial infarction.2 The mechanisms for these beneficial effects of MR antagonists have not been fully elucidated. Recent studies in rats with ischemia-induced heart failure suggest that blocking MR in the brain may play an important role. Thus, intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of the MR antagonist spironolactone (SL) reduces renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA),3,4 improves renal excretion of sodium and water,3 reduces circulating inflammatory mediators,5 and prevents left ventricular remodeling.4

The central nervous system sites of action of aldosterone and MR antagonists are still poorly defined. MR are widely distributed in the brain6 and are largely occupied by corticosterone,7 which is present in higher concentrations than aldosterone8 and binds to MR with equal affinity.7 The enzyme 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11ß-HSD-2), which has a more restricted distribution in the brain,9–11 rapidly converts corticosterone to an inactive metabolite, increasing the likelihood of aldosterone binding to MR. The coexpression of 11ß-HSD-2 with MR may therefore identify brain regions that are particularly sensitive to aldosterone. Consistent with that hypothesis, a recent study found that the abundance of 11ß-HSD-2 protein in the nucleus tractus solitarius,11 a cardiovascular afferent integrative center in the hindbrain, correlates closely with the nuclear translocation of MR in response to systemically administered aldosterone.12

The paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus is a well recognized cardiovascular integrative center of the forebrain that contributes to the augmented sympathetic drive in heart failure. PVN neurons express MR,13 but 11ß-HSD-2 activity has not previously been described in this region of the brain. Using sensitive molecular and physiological techniques, we tested the hypothesis that the PVN might also be a target for the central actions of aldosterone.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
General
Experiments were performed on 59 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (300 to 350 g). Ten rats had been adrenalectomized (ADX) by Harlan (Indianapolis, IN) and were shipped to us 7 days after surgery. The ADX rats were allowed 3 to 5 days to adapt to their new environment before study. Animals were housed in The University of Iowa Animal Care Facility where they were exposed to a normal 12:12-hour light-dark cycle and were provided with tap water and rat chow ad libitum. ADX rats were also provided with 0.9% NaCl. Studies were performed in accordance with the "Guiding Principles for Research Involving Animals and Human Beings" of the American Physiological Society.14 The experimental procedures were approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Drugs Administered
Glycyrrhizic acid (GA) and carbenoxolone (CBX) are both potent 11ß-HSD-2 inhibitors,15 but with important differences. CBX has the potential to block gap junctions; GA does not, and has been used to control for the gap junction blocking effect of CBX.16,17 From a practical standpoint, GA is stickier than CBX and so less amenable to microinjection via micropipettes.

CBX, GA, hexamethonium bromide, and SL were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo). CBX, GA, and SL were initially dissolved in absolute ethanol and then diluted with artificial cerebrospinal fluid to a desired concentration, with the final ethanol concentration <1%. The same volume of the vehicle ([VEH] <1% ethanol in artificial cerebrospinal fluid) was administered as a control for the ICV injections and tissue microinjections. Hexamethonium was dissolved in saline for intravenous injection. The doses of CBX and GA used in this study were derived from previous related studies18,19 and optimized in preliminary experiments.

Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to determine whether messenger RNA for 11ß-HSD-2 is expressed in PVN. Eight rats were euthanized with an overdose of urethane. The brains were removed and cut into 450-µm coronal sections. A punch biopsy was obtained from right and left PVN and from right and left cortex (in the same section) using a 15-gauge needle stub (ID 1.5 mm),20 yielding 600 to 800 µg of each tissue. Total RNA was isolated from PVN and cortex using TRI reagent (Molecular Research Center Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio). cDNAs were synthesized using TaqMan reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems). PCR primers and TaqMan probes for 11ß-HSD-2 were designed using the computer program Primer Express (Applied Biosystems). The sequences of primers and probe for 11ß-HSD-2 were the following: forward primer, 5'-TGGAACCTCCAAGGCAGCTA-3'; reverse primer, 5'-TGATACCCCAGGGAAGCAGTT-3'; probe, 5'-TGCACTGCTCATGGACACATTCAGCTG-3'. Real-time PCR was performed using a previously described method.21,22 To obtain a calibration curve, we amplified the amount of plasmid (PCR2.1-TOPO vector; Invitrogen) encompassing rat 11ß-HSD-2 cDNA. The standard curve for 11ß-HSD-2 was generated using serially diluted solutions (105, 106, 107, 108, 109, and 1010 copies) of plasmid. The target message in unknown samples was quantified by measuring the threshold cycle (Ct) and by using a calibration curve to determine the starting target message quantity. Quantification of 11ß-HSD-2 mRNA was expressed as copy number per nanogram of total RNA.

Electrophysiology/Microinjection
The general methods have been described previously.23 Forty-two rats were anesthetized with urethane (1.5 g/kg IP). Supplemental urethane (0.1 to 0.3 g/kg IP or IV) was administered if spontaneous increases in arterial pressure (AP), heart rate (HR), or respiratory rate, or responses to a noxious stimulus, were observed during surgery or experimental recording. Recording sessions began at least an hour after completion of the surgical preparation.

At the end of each experiment, the net value of renal nerve activity was determined by subtracting the background noise recorded after injection of the ganglion blocker hexamethonium (30 mg/kg IV). The recordings of rectified and integrated RSNA, single unit PVN neuronal activity, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and HR were analyzed using methods described previously.23 Data were averaged over 1-minute intervals, and a 3-minute average of baseline activity was used as a control for responses to injection of CBX or GA. Absolute values were used to calculate the changes in MAP and HR, and a percent change from baseline was used to calculate changes in integrated RSNA. The relationship of PVN neuronal discharge to the cardiac cycle was determined by post-stimulus time histograms, triggered by the peak of the arterial pressure pulse across a 3-minute interval.

The last PVN recording or tissue microinjection site in each experiment was marked with pontamine sky blue, and the anatomic locations of other recording and microinjection sites were extrapolated with respect to this reference point. All sites were plotted on schematic tracings of the PVN, based on the rat atlas of Paxinos and Watson.24

Immunohistochemistry
CBX (15 µg in 2 µL, 5 rats) or VEH (2 µL, 4 rats) was administered ICV. Two hours later, rats were anesthetized and transcardially perfused with PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde. Brain tissues were removed and processed for c-fos expression using the avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex technique, as previously described.25,26 A rabbit polyclonal anti-Fos antiserum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif) was used. The c-fos positive cells in posterior magnocellular, medial parvocellular, and dorsal parvocellular regions of PVN were counted manually in 2 adjacent coronal sections, one of which included the maximal expanse of PVN. An average value for the number of c-fos positive neurons counted in the 2 sections, reported as c-fos positive neurons/100 µm2, was used for data analysis.

Data Analysis
Statistical significance among multiple comparisons was determined by 1-way or 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey test. Paired t test was used for comparison between peak responses and baseline. Other group data were compared by t test. Values are presented as means±SEM. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Expression of 11ß-HSD-2 mRNA in PVN
Real-time PCR analysis revealed the presence of 11ß-HSD-2 mRNA in the PVN and in cortex sampled at the same stereotaxic level. The expression of 11ß-HSD-2 mRNA was 2.6-fold higher (P<0.01, 8 rats) in PVN compared with cortex (Figure 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Comparison of 11ß-HSD-2 mRNA expression (real-time PCR) in the PVN of hypothalamus vs brain cortex. Values are expressed as mean±SEM; n=number of rats; *P<0.05 vs cortex.

Sympathoexcitatory Effects of 11ß-HSD-2 Inhibition
Microinjection of the 11ß-HSD-2 inhibitor CBX (2 µg, n=7) into PVN produced a sympathoexcitatory response (Figure 2A, 2B) characterized by significant (P<0.05) increases from baseline (Table) in RSNA (27.4±5.8%) MAP (8.4±2.5 mm Hg), and HR (26.2±6.2 bpm). The same volume of VEH (100 nL, n=5) elicited no significant response (Figure 2B). Microinjection of CBX into sites dorsal, lateral, and anterior to PVN did not significantly alter MAP (1.3±0.2 mm Hg), HR (4.3±3.8 bpm), or RSNA.(3.2±1.8%). Microinjection of CBX into the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus, 1.0 mm caudal to PVN, did induce a mild increase in MAP (5.7±0.2 mm Hg), HR (16.4±2.9 bpm), and RSNA (16.8±2.6%) in 2 of the 4 rats tested.


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Representative tracing illustrating the effects on HR, RSNA, and AP of microinjecting the 11ß-HSD-2 inhibitor CBX bilaterally into PVN. RSNA insets: fast time base tracings of baseline and peak RSNA, illustrating the bursting quality of discharge (time bar 1 s). B, Grouped data showing the changes from baseline ({Delta}) in HR, RSNA, and MAP elicited by bilateral PVN microinjections of CBX vs VEH. Arrows indicate time of PVN microinjection; n=number of injections; *P<0.05.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Baseline Values for Microinjection Studies

ICV CBX (Figure 3) elicited significant (P<0.05) increases from baseline (Table) in PVN neuronal firing (from 2.1±0.3 to 7.2±1.3 spikes/s), RSNA (by 84±21%), MAP (9.8±2.5 mm Hg), and HR (89.8±14.7 bpm). The onset latency of these responses was 2–3 minutes, with peak responses at ~40 to 50 minutes and durations ~90 minutes. The same volume of VEH (ICV, n=6) had no effects. Pretreatment with SL (20 µg ICV, n=6), prevented the CBX-induced increases in PVN activity (from 2.4±0.7 to 2.1±1.1 spikes/s), RSNA (4.5±7.0%), MAP (–0.9±2.7 mm Hg), or HR (22.0±9.4 bpm). SL alone had no effect on baseline values (Table) of MAP, HR, or RSNA.


Figure 3
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, Representative tracings showing the response of a PVN neuron and simultaneously recorded HR, RSNA, and AP to ICV administration of the 11ß-HSD-2 inhibitor CBX (15 µg). B, CBX-induced sympathoexcitatory responses were abolished by pretreatment with ICV SL (20 µg). RSNA insets in A and B: fast time base tracings of baseline and peak RSNA illustrating the bursting quality of discharge (time bar 1 sec). Boxed insets in A and B: post-stimulus time histograms illustrating pulse-related activity of the PVN neuron. C, Grouped data showing that the increases ({Delta}) from baseline in MAP, HR, RSNA, and PVN neuronal activity induced by ICV CBX are prevented by pretreatment with the MR antagonist SL (*P<0.01). Arrows indicate time of CBX injection; n=number of injections; *P<0.01.

ICV injection of GA (10 µg, n=6; Figure 4) also significantly (P<0.01) increased PVN neuronal activity (1.8±0.3 to 7.7±1.6 spikes/s), RSNA (106.3±28.9%), MAP (29.3±7.8 mm Hg), and HR (73.0±11.2 bpm) from baseline (Table).


Figure 4
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A, Representative tracings showing the response of a PVN neuron and simultaneously recorded HR, AP, and RSNA to ICV administration of the 11ß-HSD-2 inhibitor GA (10 µg). RSNA and boxed insets as described for Figure 3. B, Grouped data showing a significant increase in PVN neuronal activity along with significant change ({Delta}) from baseline in MAP, HR, and RSNA in response to ICV injection of GA, compared with VEH. Arrow indicates GA or VEH injection; n=number of injections; *P<0.01.

In ADX rats, neither CBX (15 µg ICV, n=5 rats) nor GA (10 µg ICV, n=5 rats) elicited a significant change in MAP, HR, RSNA, or PVN neuronal activity (data not shown). Consistent with earlier reports,27–29 the ADX rats had lower baseline blood pressures, but HR, RSNA, and PVN neuronal activity were not significantly different from VEH-treated intact rats (Table).

The PVN microinjection and PVN recording sites are shown in Figure 5. The PVN neurons recorded were distributed throughout the nucleus. The majority of recorded PVN neurons (21/30 tested) had a pulse-related discharge pattern (see insets in Figures 3A, 3B, 4UpA).


Figure 5
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Schematic reconstruction of recording and microinjection sites within PVN and surrounding regions. A, Recording sites in intact rats. PVN neurons responsive to CBX alone (•) and unresponsive to SL+CBX ({circ}); PVN neurons responsive to GA ({blacktriangleup}); PVN neurons unresponsive to VEH ({Delta}). B, Recording sites in ADX rats. PVN neurons unresponsive to CBX ({circ}) and GA({Delta}). C, Microinjection sites for CBX ({blacksquare}) and vehicle ({square}) within PVN; microinjection sites of CBX in areas surrounding PVN ({diamond}). All microinjections were made bilaterally. The distance (mm) from bregma is indicated. Sections are modified from Paxinos and Watson.24 AH indicates anterior hypothalamic nucleus; f, fornix; 3V, third ventricle.

Locations of PVN Neurons Excited By ICV Injection of CBX
Immunohistochemistry of brain tissue harvested 2 hours after ICV administration of CBX (5 rats) revealed increased c-fos expression in neurons throughout the PVN, compared with VEH (4 rats). Similar increases were observed in all 3 regions in which the neurons were counted (Fig 6). Areas outside PVN but at the same stereotaxic level had scattered c-fos expression. However, there was no difference between CBX- and VEH-treated rats.


Figure 6
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. c-fos expression in PVN 2 hours after treatment with (A) ICV CBX or (B) ICV VEH. C, Quantification of c-fos expression among neurons in 3 different regions of PVN 2 hours after ICV injection of CBX or VEH. dPVN indicates dorsal PVN; mPVN, posterior magnocellular PVN; pPVN, medial parvocellular PVN; n=number of rats; *P<0.05.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Novel findings of this study are: (1) mRNA for 11ß-HSD-2 is expressed in the PVN of the hypothalamus; and (2) inhibition of 11ß-HSD-2 activity in PVN elicits a sympathetically-mediated cardiovascular response in normal rats. A logical implication of these findings is that PVN neurons are aldosterone-sensitive.

Other forebrain regions express 11ß-HSD-2 activity,9,10 but, to the best of our knowledge, this report is the first to suggest that aldosterone might act directly on PVN neurons endowed with 11ß-HSD-2–protected MR. The lack of evidence for 11ß-HSD-2 expression in PVN in previous studies9–11 likely reflects the sensitivity of the methods used. We used real-time PCR to demonstrate the presence of mRNA for 11ß-HSD-2 in PVN, and chemical inhibition of 11ß-HSD-2 activity with CBX to demonstrate the presence of functionally significant levels of 11ß-HSD-2 in PVN. These 2 lines of evidence leave little room to doubt that 11ß-HSD-2 is expressed and enzymatically active in PVN.

The cardiovascular and autonomic responses to ICV injections of CBX or GA are more dramatic than the responses elicited by microinjecting CBX directly into PVN. This is the expected result, since other brain regions expressing 11ß-HSD-29–11 are likely recruited by the ICV injection. This interpretation is consistent with the observation that ICV injection of CBX elicits a widespread increase in c-fos expression throughout PVN. The recently identified sodium- and aldosterone-sensitive solitary tract nucleus neurons,12 which were noted to have ascending projections, may be one source of extrinsic input to PVN.

The differences in the magnitude and timing of the sympathetic responses to ICV CBX and GA, as compared with the responses to PVN microinjection of CBX, probably reflect differences in experimental conditions (eg, drug solubility, tissue penetration, or numbers of neurons activated). They have no bearing on the relative influence of 11ß-HSD-2 activity in any specific brain region on sympathetic regulation under normal or pathophysiological conditions.

Most of the spontaneously discharging neurons we recorded in PVN had cardiac-related activity. Pulse-related activity was recently described in a small group of pre-autonomic neurons in dorsal, lateral, and ventrolateral PVN that were identified by their response to antidromic stimulation of the spinal cord.30 In that study, neurons in other regions of PVN were not tested. Thus, it remains unknown whether pulse-related activity is an exclusive property of presympathetic neurons. If so, our data would argue that presympathetic neurons are scattered diffusely throughout the PVN. An intermingling of preautonomic and neuroendocrine neurons is consistent with the integrative role of the PVN and with retrograde tracing studies that have demonstrated a broad distribution of presympathetic PVN neurons.31,32

Finally, our results are consistent with the emerging concept33 that nongenomic as well as genomic effects may be elicited by activation of classical MR. The cardiovascular and sympathetic responses to the ICV or PVN injection of 11ß-HSD-2 inhibitors appear to be too rapid in onset to be mediated by genomic actions of MR, and yet are blocked by SL. Early effects of MR stimulation that are responsive to classical MR antagonists have also been described in kidney, colon, and vasculature.33 Corticosterone activation of aldosterone-sensitive MR is an appealing explanation for the early onset of cardiovascular and sympathetic responses after ICV administration of CBX or GA. In human arteries, application of CBX permits cortisol to induce early nongenomic MR effects.34

That said, the precise mechanism by which corticosterone (or cortisol) binding to MR can induce an aldosterone-like response is the subject of continued investigation and speculation.35,36 The complexity of this issue is illustrated by the well known ability of glucocorticoids to inhibit aldosterone effects, presumably by competitively occupying the MR. For example, the ICV infusion of corticosterone blocks the hypertension induced by ICV infusion of aldosterone.37 It has recently been suggested that another effect of 11ß-HSD-2—the conversion of NAD to NADH—may be important in determining the outcome of glucocorticoids binding to MR.35,38 By mechanisms not fully understood, an altered redox state induced by inhibition of 11ß-HSD-2 activity may enable corticosterone to function as a MR agonist.35,38

Perspectives
It is clear from the present experiments that 11ß-HSD-2 activity in the PVN and other brain regions effectively prevents corticosterone from inappropriately activating cardiovascular presympathetic neurons. It remains to be determined whether altered 11ß-HSD-2 activity in PVN contributes to the increased sympathetic drive that occurs in cardiovascular disease states. It is noteworthy, however, that the same physiological stressors that downregulate 11ß-HSD-2 activity in peripheral tissues (eg, angiotensin II and tumor necrosis factor {alpha}39–41) are upregulated in the PVN in heart failure.21,42 In a preliminary study,43 we found that 11ß-HSD-2 mRNA is reduced in PVN of rats with experimentally induced heart failure. Thus, it is conceivable that the beneficial effects of a MR antagonist in experimental heart failure3,4,44 may be ascribed, at least in part, to blocking the effects of cortiocosterone on brain MR that are normally reserved for aldosterone by 11ß-HSD-2 activity.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health RO1 HL-063915 to R.B.F., and by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Disclosures

None.

Received January 22, 2006; first decision February 8, 2006; accepted April 19, 2006.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 709–717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pitt B. Effect of aldosterone blockade in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: implications of the RALES and EPHESUS studies. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004; 217: 53–58.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Francis J, Weiss RM, Wei SG, Johnson AK, Beltz TG, Zimmerman K, Felder RB. Central mineralocorticoid receptor blockade improves volume regulation and reduces sympathetic drive in heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 281: H2241–H2251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lal A, Veinot JP, Leenen FH. Critical role of CNS effects of aldosterone in cardiac remodeling post-myocardial infarction in rats. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 64: 437–447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Francis J, Weiss RM, Johnson AK, Felder RB. Central mineralocorticoid receptor blockade decreases plasma TNF-{alpha} after coronary artery ligation in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 284: R328–R335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Grillo C, Vallee S, McEwen BS, De Nicola AF. Properties and distribution of binding sites for the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [3H]ZK 91587 in brain. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry. 1990; 35: 11–15.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. de Kloet ER, Van Acker SA, Sibug RM, Oitzl MS, Meijer OC, Rahmouni K, de Jong W. Brain mineralocorticoid receptors and centrally regulated functions. Kidney Int. 2000; 57: 1329–1336.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Gomez-Sanchez EP, Ahmad N, Romero DG, Gomez-Sanchez CE. Is aldosterone synthesized within the rat brain? Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 288: E342–E346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Robson AC, Leckie CM, Seckl JR, Holmes MC. 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in the postnatal and adult rat brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1998; 61: 1–10.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Roland BL, Li KX, Funder JW. Hybridization histochemical localization of 11 ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in rat brain. Endocrinology. 1995; 136: 4697–4700.[Abstract]
  11. Geerling JC, Kawata M, Loewy AD. Aldosterone-sensitive neurons in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 2006; 494: 515–527.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Geerling JC, Engeland WC, Kawata M, Loewy AD. Aldosterone target neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius drive sodium appetite. J Neurosci. 2006; 26: 411–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Han F, Ozawa H, Matsuda K, Nishi M, Kawata M. Colocalization of mineralocorticoid receptor and glucocorticoid receptor in the hippocampus and hypothalamus. Neurosci Res. 2005; 51: 371–381.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Am Physiological Society. Guiding principles for research involving animals and human beings. Am Journal of Physiology. 2002; 283: R281–R283.
  15. Duax WL, Ghosh D, Pletnev V. Steroid dehydrogenase structures, mechanism of action, and disease. Vitam Horm. 2000; 58: 121–148.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Hewitt A, Barrie R, Graham M, Bogus K, Leiter JC, Erlichman JS. Ventilatory effects of gap junction blockade in the RTN in awake rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 287: R1407–R1418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Spataro LE, Sloane EM, Milligan ED, Wieseler-Frank J, Schoeniger D, Jekich BM, Barrientos RM, Maier SF, Watkins LR. Spinal gap junctions: potential involvement in pain facilitation. J Pain. 2004; 5: 392–405.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Gomez-Sanchez EP, Gomez-Sanchez CE. Maternal hypertension and progeny blood pressure: role of aldosterone and 11ß-HSD. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 1369–1373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gomez-Sanchez EP, Gomez-Sanchez CE. Central hypertensinogenic effects of glycyrrhizic acid and carbenoxolone. Am J Physiol. 1992; 263: E1125–E1130.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Li YF, Cornish KG, Patel KP. Alteration of NMDA NR1 receptors within the paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus in rats with heart failure. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 990–997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Francis J, Chu Y, Johnson AK, Weiss RM, Felder RB. Acute myocardial infarction induces hypothalamic cytokine synthesis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 286: H2264–H2271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Chu Y, Heistad DD, Knudtson KL, Lamping KG, Faraci FM. Quantification of mRNA for endothelial NO synthase in mouse blood vessels by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 611–616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Zhang ZH, Francis J, Weiss RM, Felder RB. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system excites hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus neurons in heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 283: H423–H433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain Is Stereotaxic Coordinates. Sydney, Australia: Academic Press; 1986.
  25. Fitts DA, Thornton SN, Ruhf AA, Zierath DK, Johnson AK, Thunhorst RL. Effects of central oxytocin receptor blockade on water and saline intake, mean arterial pressure, and c-Fos expression in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 285: R1331–R1339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Grippo AJ, Na ES, Johnson RF, Beltz TG, Johnson AK. Sucrose ingestion elicits reduced Fos expression in the nucleus accumbens of anhedonic rats. Brain Res. 2004; 1019: 259–264.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Kageyama Y, Suzuki H, Saruta T. Role of glucocorticoid in the development of glycyrrhizin-induced hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1994; 16: 761–778.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Elijovich F, Kirchberger M, Barry CR, Krakoff LR. Maintenance of arterial pressure by vasopressin and angiotensin II after adrenalectomy. Hypertension. 1983; 5: V53–V56.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Stith RD, Bhaskar M, Reddy YS, Brackett DJ, Lerner MR, Wilson MF. Cardiovascular changes in chronically adrenalectomized conscious rats. Circ Shock. 1989; 28: 395–403.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Chen QH, Toney GM. Identification and characterization of two functionally distinct groups of spinal cord-projecting paraventricular nucleus neurons with sympathetic-related activity. Neuroscience. 2003; 118: 797–807.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Swanson LW, Kuypers HG. The paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus: cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and organization of projections to the pituitary, dorsal vagal complex, and spinal cord as demonstrated by retrograde fluorescence double-labeling methods. J Comp Neurol. 1980; 194: 555–570.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Pyner S, Coote JH. Identification of branching paraventricular neurons of the hypothalamus that project to the rostroventrolateral medulla and spinal cord. Neuroscience. 2000; 100: 549–556.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Funder JW. The nongenomic actions of aldosterone. Endocr Rev. 2005; 26: 313–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Alzamora R, Michea L, Marusic ET. Role of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in nongenomic aldosterone effects in human arteries. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 1099–1104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mihailidou AS, Funder JW. Nongenomic effects of mineralocorticoid receptor activation in the cardiovascular system. Steroids. 2005; 70: 347–351.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Fuller PJ, Young MJ. Mechanisms of mineralocorticoid action. Hypertension. 2005; 46: 1227–1235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Gomez-Sanchez EP, Venkataraman MT, Thwaites D, Fort C. ICV infusion of corticosterone antagonizes ICV-aldosterone hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1990; 258: E649–E653.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Funder JW. Aldosterone, mineralocorticoid receptors and vascular inflammation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004; 217: 263–269.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Kostadinova RM, Nawrocki AR, Frey FJ, Frey BM. Tumor necrosis factor {alpha} and phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate down-regulate human 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 through p50/p50 NF-{kappa}B homodimers and Egr-1. Faseb J. 2005; 19: 650–652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Heiniger CD, Kostadinova RM, Rochat MK, Serra A, Ferrari P, Dick B, Frey BM, Frey FJ. Hypoxia causes down-regulation of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 by induction of Egr-1. Faseb J. 2003; 17: 917–919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Lanz B, Kadereit B, Ernst S, Shojaati K, Causevic M, Frey BM, Frey FJ, Mohaupt MG. Angiotensin II regulates 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 via AT2 receptors. Kidney Int. 2003; 64: 970–977.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Tan J, Wang H, Leenen FH. Increases in brain and cardiac AT1 receptor and ACE densities after myocardial infarct in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 286: H1665–H1671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Yu Y, Wei SG, Zhang Z-H, Chu Y, Weiss RM, Felder RB. Oral eplerenone inhibits the central effects of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} on 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 gene expression in heart failure rats. Circulation. 2005; 112: II–191.Abstract.
  44. Francis J, Beltz T, Johnson AK, Felder RB. Mineralocorticoids act centrally to regulate blood-borne tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in normal rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 285: R1402–R1409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Yu, S.-G. Wei, Z.-H. Zhang, E. Gomez-Sanchez, R. M. Weiss, and R. B. Felder
Does Aldosterone Upregulate the Brain Renin-Angiotensin System in Rats With Heart Failure?
Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 727 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. H. Yang, L. H. Li, S. Y. Shin, S. Lee, S. Y. Lee, S. K. Han, and P. D. Ryu
Adrenalectomy Potentiates Noradrenergic Suppression of GABAergic Transmission in Parvocellular Neurosecretory Neurons of Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 514 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z.-H. Zhang, Y. Yu, Y.-M. Kang, S.-G. Wei, and R. B. Felder
Aldosterone acts centrally to increase brain renin-angiotensin system activity and oxidative stress in normal rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H1067 - H1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
N. Marissal-Arvy, A. Gaumont, A. Langlois, F. Dabertrand, M. Bouchecareilh, C. Tridon, and P. Mormede
Strain differences in hypothalamic pituitary adrenocortical axis function and adipogenic effects of corticosterone in rats
J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 195(3): 473 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Fujita, K. Ando, A. Nagae, and T. Fujita
Sympathoexcitation by Oxidative Stress in the Brain Mediates Arterial Pressure Elevation in Salt-Sensitive Hypertension
Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): 360 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
A. Naray-Fejes-Toth and G. Fejes-Toth
Reply to Geerling and Loewy
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): F442 - F443.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/1/127    most recent
01.HYP.0000224296.96235.ddv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation