| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2006;48:165.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Division of Endocrinology (D.N., K.S., T.T., T.U., A.S., M.N.), National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Research Institute, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine (M.T., Y.H.), Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Correspondence to Daisuke Nagata, Division of Endocrinology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center Research Institute, 1-1 Fukakusamukaihata-cho, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto-city, Kyoto 612-8555, Japan. E-mail dnagata{at}kyotolan.hosp.go.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: aldosterone nitric oxide synthase
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although in vivo studies have shown that Aldo induces unfavorable changes in the vasculature, the effect of Aldo on endothelial cells, especially on the function of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), remains controversial. Laursen et al11 showed that angiotensin IIinduced ROS production may alter endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation as a result of interaction between superoxide and NO and also as a consequence of interactions between peroxynitrite and the eNOS cofactor, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4). This observation strongly supports the possibility that oxidation of BH4 by ROS may be a pathogenic cause of eNOS "uncoupling." We, therefore, speculated that this mechanism may also be involved in the pathophysiology of Aldo-induced endothelial dysfunction. In the present study, we attempted to clarify the effects of Aldo on eNOS function in endothelial cells.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of GTP Cyclohydrolase-1 Expression Vector
Details are available in Supplementary Text I available at http://www.hypertensionaha.org.
Cell Culture and Vector Transduction
HUVECs were cultured in Humedia EG with 2% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. For the experiments involving gene transduction, either GTP cyclohydrolase-1 (GCH1) expression vector or control green fluorescent protein expression vector were transfected at 4 µg for 5x105 cells with the PolyMag Magnetofection kit (OZ Bioscience) according to the manufacturers instructions. After an incubation period of 2 days, the medium was replaced with Humedia basal medium containing 0.1% FBS to reduce the effects of stimulation by serum mitogens. After 8 hours of incubation in low-serum medium, the vector-transfected HUVECs were treated with Aldo (107 mol/L). When treated with inhibitors such as eplerenone (105 mol/L), NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester ([l-NAME] 2 mmol/L), or okadaic acid (108 mol/L), the cells were incubated with the indicated chemicals 1 hour before stimulation with aldosterone.
Real-Time RT-PCR
All of the primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR (NOX1, NOX2, NOX4, p22phox, p40phox, p47phox, p67phox, GCH1, and GAPDH) were purchased from Takara. The experiments were performed using SYBR One-Step quantitative RT-PCR kits (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instructions, with GAPDH as the internal control.
Small Interfering RNA Construction and Transfection
Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and p47phox small interfering RNA (siRNA) were constructed, using as a reference the cDNA sequence obtained from the Whitehead Institute web-based computer program (http://jura.wi.mit.edu/bioc/siRNAext/). Details are described in Supplementary Text II (available online).
Measurement of ROS
Intracellular production of ROS in HUVECs after incubation with Aldo and/or eplerenone was measured by 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate ([DCF] 10 µmol/L, Wako Pure Chemicals) according to the manufacturers instructions. HUVECs were loaded with DCF for 30 minutes at 22°C, washed 3 times in PBS, and then placed on a laser scanning confocal microscope CSU21 (Yokokawa Electric), equipped with a high-resolution digital CCD camera, ORCAII-ER (Hamamatsu Photonics). Images were collected by single rapid scans with identical parameters being used for all of the samples. Fluorescence intensity data were quantified in 4 independent experiments.
Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analysis was carried out as described previously.12,13 Briefly, cell lysates were extracted with Nonidet P-40lysis buffer (50 mmol/L of Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mmol/L of NaCl, 1% [NP-40], 2 µg/mL of aprotinin, 2 µg/mL of leupeptin, 1 mmol/L of PMSF, and 1 mmol/L of sodium orthovanadate) followed by SDS-PAGE (25 µg of protein per lane). For immunoblot analysis of the dimeric form of eNOS, samples were subjected to 6% to 9% gradient polyacrylamide gels without preheating, and the temperature of the gels was maintained at 4°C during electrophoresis (low-temperature SDS-PAGE). To separate membrane and cytosolic protein fraction and evaluate p47phox translocation, we used the ProteoExtract Subcellular Proteome Extraction kit (Calbiochem) according to the manufacturers instructions. The membranes were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies at 1:250 to 1:1000 dilutions followed by incubation with the secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase at 1:6000 dilution. The ECL-PLUS Western Blotting Detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used for detection. The density of the bands was quantified using the NIH Image program. Each experiment was repeated 3 to 4 times.
cGMP Assay
To evaluate NO output from HUVECs, intracellular cGMP concentration was measured using a cGMP enzyme immunoassay system (R&D Systems). Details are described in Supplementary Text III (available online).
Protein Phosphatase 2A Assay
Protein phosphatase (PP) 2A activity was measured in HUVECs treated with Aldo and/or other reagents, such as eplerenone (105 mol/L) and okadaic acid (108 mol/L) for 16 hours after incubation in low-serum medium. We performed this assay using PP2A immunoprecipitation phosphatase assay kit (Upstate Biotechnology) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Statistical Analyses
Values are expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed using ANOVA with Scheffes F procedure for posthoc analysis. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effects of Aldo on Transcription of p47phox and Other NADPH Oxidase Components
Aldo at 109 to 107 mol/L increased p47phox transcription significantly in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2A). However, transcription levels of NOX1, NOX2, NOX4, p22phox, p40phox, or p67phox were not changed by Aldo stimulation (data not shown). Eplerenone 105 mol/L significantly inhibited p47phox upregulation caused by Aldo (Figure 2A). GR knockdown did not change the levels of Aldo-induced p47phox transcripts compared with scrambled siRNA controls (Figure 2B).
|
Effects of Aldo on Translocation of p47phox to the Plasma Membrane
We also showed that Aldo significantly increased the membrane localization of p47phox protein. However, eplerenone significantly inhibited membrane-localized p47phox (Figure I, available online).
Effects of Aldo on NO Production in HUVECs
The effects of Aldo on NO production were investigated by measuring intracellular cGMP concentration in HUVECs with or without stimulation of VEGF (100 ng/mL). Pretreatment with Aldo 107 mol/L for 16 hours significantly inhibited NO output in HUVECs stimulated with VEGF (Figure 3A). The effects of Aldo were reversed by eplerenone 105 mol/L (Figure 3B). In unstimulated HUVECs, Aldo treatment did not result in significant changes in NO output, with output levels being approximately the same as that caused by eNOS-inhibited conditions with L-NAME.
|
Effects of Aldo on Ser 1177 Phosphorylation of eNOS
Stimulation with VEGF (100 ng/mL) for 30 minutes increased phosphorylation of both eNOS Ser 1177 and Akt Ser 473 of eNOS to &3 times the levels seen without stimulation. Pretreatment with Aldo (107 mol/L) for 16 hours significantly inhibited the VEGF-stimulated increase in the phosphorylation of eNOS Ser 1177 (Figure 4A). GR knockdown did not alter the effect of Aldo on eNOS phosphorylation (Figure 4A). Eplerenone 105 mol/L or okadaic acid 108 mol/L significantly reversed the inhibitory effect of Aldo on eNOS Ser 1177 phosphorylation, whereas Akt Ser 473 phosphorylation remained unchanged (Figure 4B). The phosphorylation levels of eNOS Thr 495 did not change under the conditions tested. Figure 4C shows the quantitative analysis of relative phosphorylation levels of eNOS Ser 1177 and Akt Ser 473 in Figure 4B (n=4).
|
Effects of Aldo on eNOS Dimerization
We performed low-temperature SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting to investigate eNOS dimerization. There was no difference in eNOS expression between control and Aldo-treated cells using conventional SDS-PAGE, but low-temperature SDS-PAGE showed that the eNOS dimmer/monomer ratio decreased when treated with Aldo (Figure 5A). Eplerenone or BH4 cotreatment significantly reversed this inhibition. Figure 5B shows the quantitative analysis of the dimmer/monomer ratio of eNOS in Figure 5A.
|
PP2A Activity Induced by Aldo
Aldo treatment for 16 hours significantly activated PP2A. Eplerenone or okadaic acid cotreatment significantly inhibited this activation (Figure II, available online).
Effects of Aldo on GCH1 Transcriptional Level
We investigated whether Aldo regulated the gene of GCH1, which catalyzes the conversion of GTP to D-erythro-7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate, the first and rate-limiting step in BH4 biosynthesis. Aldo at concentrations between 109 and 107 mol/L did not change GCH1 transcription levels after 16 hours of incubation (Supplementary Figure III). In addition, there was no significant change in GCH1 transcription levels after incubation with Aldo (107 mol/L) for 2, 4, and 8 hours (data not shown).
Effects of BH4, GCH1 Overexpression, or p47phox Knockdown on NO Output Inhibited by Aldo
The additional BH4 and GCH1 overexpression by the GCH1-expression vector partially but significantly reversed the Aldo-induced decrease in NO production (Figure 6A). In addition, p47phox knockdown using siRNA (75% reduction compared with control; Figure 6B) also reversed the inhibitory effects of Aldo on eNOS function (Figure 6A).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the absence of either L-arginine or BH4, eNOS produces superoxide and hydrogen peroxide instead of NO.23,24 This phenomenon has been referred to as uncoupling. It has been shown in the vasculature of apolipoprotein Edeficient mice that upregulation of ROS production and subsequent oxidation of BH4 by peroxynitrite may lead to uncoupling of eNOS.11 The present study demonstrated that eNOS function was negatively regulated by Aldo via 2 distinct mechanisms. The first mechanism was through oxidation of BH4 and uncoupling of eNOS because of a deficiency in its cofactor. This is the first report that Aldo has an action similar to angiotensin II, which results in suppression of eNOS function via an NO synthase uncoupling mechanism, induced by BH4 deficiency. Bendall et al25 and other groups have shown that the eNOS dimer/monomer ratio serves as a marker of eNOS uncoupling. We performed low-temperature SDS-PAGE and showed that Aldo attenuated eNOS dimer formation (Figure 5). Furthermore, eplerenone or BH4 reversed this effect, showing that BH4 deficiency via MR activation caused eNOS uncoupling. The second mechanism was through activation of PP2A and dephosphorylation of p-eNOS Ser 1177. Michell et al26 have shown previously that PP2A is responsible for dephosphorylation of eNOS Ser1177, because pretreatment with okadaic acid selectively blocked protein kinase Cmediated dephosphorylation of Ser1177. Although we did not clarify the mechanism of PP2A activation by Aldo, the observations that either eplerenone or okadaic acid pretreatment significantly reversed the inhibitory effect of Aldo on eNOS Ser 1177 phosphorylation and that the phosphorylation levels of VEGF-induced Akt Ser 473 were not inhibited by Aldo pretreatment indicate that Aldo regulates the level of eNOS Ser 1177 phosphorylation by activating PP2A without inhibiting the major eNOS-upstream kinase, Akt.
Several studies have shown that Aldo acts as a vasodilator because of its role as a positive regulator of eNOS through Akt activation.27,28 Although these observations seem to be inconsistent with the findings of our study, the experimental conditions used in these earlier studies were completely different from our methodology. Because the Aldo stimulation time was relatively short (a couple of minutes) in these other studies, it is possible that Aldo may have caused vasodilation as a result of redox-sensitive Akt activation or, alternatively, by an unknown nongenomic mechanism. Uhrenholt et al29 also suggested that the detrimental effects of Aldo on cardiovascular function may be via a genomic effect that is balanced by nongenomic activation of eNOS in healthy individuals.
Whenever the function of Aldo through MR is investigated, it is important to consider the possibility of a cross-reaction between Aldo and GR. Because there is evidence that GR binds Aldo at almost the same affinity as cortisol and that GR mediates the effects of Aldo,30,31 we used an siRNA technique to reduce GR expression and thereby eliminate the effects of Aldo on the receptors. GR knockdown did not cause any difference in phosphorylation levels of eNOS in the HUVECs compared with controls. Furthermore, we found that the MR-specific antagonist, eplerenone, significantly blocked the inhibitory effects of Aldo on eNOS function. This suggests that MR was the main receptor mediating the pro-oxidative effect of Aldo in our investigations.
In summary, this study demonstrated the critical roles of eNOS uncoupling and PP2A activation induced by Aldo in HUVECs. We consider it important that further studies investigate the molecular mechanism underlying Aldo-induced endothelial dysfunction, because this knowledge may lead to novel strategies for the prevention of atherosclerosis.
Perspectives
It is well recognized that Aldo induces cardiovascular damage, such as endothelial dysfunction or perivascular fibrosis, but the exact mechanisms of these effects are not well established. This study has shown that Aldo downregulates eNOS activity via ROS production and Ser 1177 dephosphorylation in an MR-dependent manner. Future studies are needed to ascertain whether MR blockade could inhibit oxidative stress and improve endothelial function in in vivo models.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan. D.N. was supported in part from a research grant of the Japan Heart Foundation and a research grant of Pfizer.
Disclosures
None.
Received December 2, 2005; first decision December 21, 2005; accepted April 10, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit of the epithelial sodium channel is an aldosterone-induced transcript in mammalian collecting ducts, and this transcriptional response is mediated via distinct cis-elements in the 5'-flanking region of the gene. Mol Endocrinol. 2001; 15: 575588.Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Mulder, V. Mellin, J. Favre, M. Vercauteren, I. Remy-Jouet, C. Monteil, V. Richard, S. Renet, J. P. Henry, A. Y. Jeng, et al. Aldosterone synthase inhibition improves cardiovascular function and structure in rats with heart failure: a comparison with spironolactone Eur. Heart J., June 27, 2008; (2008) ehn277v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Iwashima, T. Yoshimoto, I. Minami, M. Sakurada, Y. Hirono, and Y. Hirata Aldosterone Induces Superoxide Generation via Rac1 Activation in Endothelial Cells Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1009 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Imanishi, H. Ikejima, H. Tsujioka, A. Kuroi, K. Kobayashi, Y. Muragaki, S. Mochizuki, M. Goto, K. Yoshida, and T. Akasaka Addition of Eplerenone to an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Effectively Improves Nitric Oxide Bioavailability Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 734 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bauersachs and D. Fraccarollo More NO-No More ROS: Combined Selective Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockade and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition for Vascular Protection Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 624 - 625. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Brown Aldosterone and Vascular Inflammation Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 161 - 167. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Sartorio, D. Fraccarollo, P. Galuppo, M. Leutke, G. Ertl, I. Stefanon, and J. Bauersachs Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockade Improves Vasomotor Dysfunction and Vascular Oxidative Stress Early After Myocardial Infarction Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 919 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Brandes Avoiding Vicious Circles: Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Prevents Vascular Oxidative Stress Early After Myocardial Infarction Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 842 - 843. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Oberleithner, C. Riethmuller, H. Schillers, G. A. MacGregor, H. E. de Wardener, and M. Hausberg Plasma sodium stiffens vascular endothelium and reduces nitric oxide release PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16281 - 16286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Mejia-Vilet, V. Ramirez, C. Cruz, N. Uribe, G. Gamba, and N. A. Bobadilla Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury is prevented by the mineralocorticoid receptor blocker spironolactone Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): F78 - F86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Adler and G. H. Williams Aldosterone: Villain or Protector? Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 31 - 32. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hirono, T. Yoshimoto, N. Suzuki, T. Sugiyama, M. Sakurada, S. Takai, N. Kobayashi, M. Shichiri, and Y. Hirata Angiotensin II Receptor Type 1-Mediated Vascular Oxidative Stress and Proinflammatory Gene Expression in Aldosterone-Induced Hypertension: The Possible Role of Local Renin-Angiotensin System Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1688 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bauersachs and D. Fraccarollo Endothelial NO Synthase Target of Aldosterone Hypertension, July 1, 2006; 48(1): 27 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |