Published online before print August 14, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000237669.64066.c5
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2006;48:404.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
Acute Reduction of Blood Pressure by Nitroglycerin Does Not Normalize Large Artery Stiffness in Essential Hypertension
From the Cardiovascular Division, King’s College London School of Medicine, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Correspondence to Philip J. Chowienczyk, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St Thomas’ Hospital, Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. E-mail phil.chowienczyk{at}kcl.ac.uk
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Stiffness of large elastic arteries is elevated in subjects with hypertension, an effect that could potentially be explained by increased distending pressure. We examined effects of an acute change in blood pressure on carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and carotid artery distensibility (inversely related to stiffness) in normotensive control subjects (n=20, mean age 42) with mean arterial pressure (MAP) 84±1.7 mm Hg (mean±SE) and subjects with essential hypertension (n=20, mean age 45, MAP 104±2.0 mm Hg). Normotensive subjects received intravenous nitroglycerin (NTG) and angiotensin II to lower/increase blood pressure. Hypertensive subjects received NTG to lower blood pressure. Pulse wave velocity was 24% (95% CI: 12% to 35%) higher and carotid distensibility 47% (95% CI: 32% to 63%) lower in hypertensive subjects compared with controls. In normotensive subjects, acute changes in blood pressure produced expected changes in stiffness. However, in hypertensive subjects, despite reducing MAP by 22 mm Hg to the same level as in normotensive subjects, there was no detectable reduction in arterial stiffness: pulse wave velocity remained 24% (95% CI: 10% to 38%) higher and carotid distensibility 48% (95% CI: 31% to 63%) lower in hypertensive compared with normotensive subjects. Because blood pressure–independent effects of NTG are, if anything, to reduce stiffness, these results indicate that elevated carotid and aortic stiffness in hypertensive subjects is not explained by elevated blood pressure but relates to structural change in the arterial wall.
Key Words: arterial pressure • carotid arteries • hypertension, arterial
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of the functional stiffness of large elastic arteries, is increased in hypertensive subjects1,2 and, in such subjects,3–5 as well as in other groups at high cardiovascular risk6,7 and in older subjects in the general population,8 predicts future cardiovascular events. Arterial stiffness is determined both by the structure of the arterial wall and by the loading conditions on the wall, particularly mean distending pressure, which is closely related to mean arterial pressure (MAP).9,10 An acute elevation of blood pressure results in increased arterial stiffness in both animal models and in human subjects.9,11,12
However, in hypertensive subjects it is not clear whether increased stiffness occurs as a result of elevated blood pressure or whether there is an intrinsic change in the elasticity of the arterial wall so that, when compared at the same operating pressure, it is stiffer than that in normotensive subjects. Previous studies to address this issue have examined the relationship of arterial pressure to diameter of the common carotid artery throughout the cardiac cycle with extrapolation to a common pressure. This approach suggests that, when compared at the same operating pressure, stiffness of the common carotid artery is similar in hypertensive and in normotensive subjects13–15 but makes assumptions regarding the form of the pressure/diameter relationship and homogeneity of the arterial wall.
In the present study, we examined whether acute reduction of blood pressure in subjects with sustained hypertension to levels seen in normotensive subjects normalizes carotid-femoral PWV and common carotid artery stiffness. We reduced blood pressure by intravenous infusion of nitroglycerin (NTG), an agent that, in the absence of a change in blood pressure, has small effects on stiffness of muscular arteries (tending to reduce stiffness)16–18 but little or no effect on large elastic arteries.19,20 We also examined effects of an acute increase in blood pressure on stiffness in normotensive subjects using angiotensin II (Ang II) and also effects of blood pressure reduction in normotensive subjects using NTG.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Subjects
Subjects with essential hypertension (n=20) in whom blood pressure had not been controlled to a systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and/or diastolic pressure <85 mm Hg on their last office reading despite appropriate lifestyle and (in 17 of 20 subjects) pharmacological treatment were recruited from Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital hypertension clinic. All of the subjects had had hypertension diagnosed on the basis of
3 readings of systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg for 12 months before the study. All of the subjects were screened by physical examination and appropriate investigations and were excluded if they were current smokers, had evidence of clinically significant coronary artery, cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial disease, suffered from diabetes or renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >140 µmol L–1), or had evidence of secondary hypertension. Subjects were also excluded if they had evidence of carotid artery plaque on ultrasound scanning. Drug treatment included diuretics (9 of 20 subjects), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or receptor blockers (9 of 20), calcium channel blockers (7 of 20), 
-adrenergic antagonists (4 of 20), and ß-adrenergic antagonists (1 of 20). Normotensive subjects of similar age were recruited from the local community. The study was approved by St Thomas’ Hospital local research ethics committee, and all of the subjects gave written informed consent.
Protocol
Subjects were asked to attend in the morning after having refrained from caffeine and alcohol for 12 hours. Measurements were made in a quiet temperature-controlled vascular laboratory. Subjects lay supine and an intravenous cannula was placed in the left antecubital fossa and normal saline infused at 1 mL min–1. After 30-minute baseline measurements of blood pressure (using an oscillometric method, Omron 705, Omron, according to British Hypertension Society guidelines), carotid-femoral PWV and carotid artery distensibility (as described below) were determined. Normotensive and hypertensive subjects then received vasoactive drugs as detailed below.
Normotensive Subjects
After baseline measurements 16 of the normotensive subjects received a cumulative rising dose infusion of Ang II (Clinafla, 75, 150, and 300 ng min–1, a dose that, in pilot studies, increased MAP by &20 mm Hg). Each dose was given for 20 minutes. Measurements of blood pressure, carotid-femoral PWV, and carotid distensibility were made over the last 15 minutes of the infusion. Another group (n=15) of the normotensive subjects received NTG (10, 30, and 100 µg min–1, each dose for 20 minutes). Subjects receiving both Ang II and NTG were studied on 2 occasions separated by 1 week, receiving either NTG or Ang II on each study day. All of the infusions were given at 1 mL min–1.
Hypertensive Subjects
After baseline measurements, hypertensive subjects received a cumulative dose infusion of NTG (Faulding Pharmaceuticals, 10, 30, and 100 µg min–1, each dose for 20 minutes). In pilot studies, this dose reduced MAP by &20 mm Hg. Measurements of blood pressure, carotid-femoral PWV, and carotid distensibility were performed as in the protocol for normotensive subjects.
Carotid-Femoral PWV
Stiffness over the carotid-femoral portion of the arterial tree was assessed by measuring carotid-femoral PWV using the SphygmoCor system (Atcor). ECG-referenced sequential carotid and femoral tonometry was used to measure foot-to-foot carotid-femoral transit time and PWV calculated from the carotid-femoral path length divided by transit time. Path length was estimated from linear distance from the sternal notch to the femoral artery at the point of applanation. The same distance was used for all of the measurements in each subject. PWV of an arterial segment is inversely related to the square root of the distensibility of that segment.9 Because it does not require concomitant measurement of arterial pressure, PWV is regarded by many as the most reliable measure of large artery stiffness21 and is the measure that has been used in most outcome studies to date.3–7 Measurements obtained with the SphygmoCor system correlate closely with those obtained from the Complior system22 and also with Doppler ultrasound measurements of PWV.23 All of the measurements were made by an experienced observer, and readings that did not conform to the internal quality checks provided by the SphygmoCor software were rejected. Measurements were made in triplicate with mean values used for analysis.
Carotid Artery Distensibility
Carotid artery stiffness was assessed by measuring carotid artery distensibility. High-resolution ultrasound (Acuson 128XP with 7-MHz linear transducer) was used to image the left common carotid artery. Images were captured at 20 frames per second for 5 seconds and analyzed using automated wall-tracking software (Medical Imaging Applications LLC) to determine the maximum and minimum diameters (Dmax and Dmin) of the artery as measured from the intima-luminal interface and change in diameter (
D). Carotid artery blood pressure and pulse pressure (P) were determined by carotid artery tonometry using a Millar tonometer and SphygmoCor system (Atcor) calibrated to brachial diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure. Common carotid artery distensibility was calculated as 
|
|
and expressed in mm Hg–1x10–3. In addition, common carotid cross-sectional compliance was calculated as the change in cross-sectional area divided by P.
Statistics
Subject characteristics are summarized as mean (SD), and results are summarized as mean±SE. Comparison between groups was performed using Student unpaired t test or a 
2 test as appropriate. Changes in hemodynamic and stiffness measures in response to vasoactive drugs were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Potential effects of heart rate and age were examined by seeking an interaction between these variables and the response to drugs. SPSS (version 13.0) was used for all of the analyses. A P<0.05 was taken to be significant, and all of the tests were 2-tailed.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Subject Characteristics
Subject characteristics, including baseline measurements of PWV and common carotid distensibility, are summarized in Table 1. Hypertensive and normotensive subjects were similar with respect to age, gender, ethnicity, renal function, and lipid profiles, but hypertensive subjects had a higher body mass index. As expected, PWV was higher and carotid distensibility lower in hypertensive subjects compared with controls (Table 1). The size of the difference between the groups was considerable, PWV being 24% (95% CI: 12% to 35%) higher and carotid distensibility 47% (95% CI: 32% to 63%) lower in hypertensive subjects compared with controls.
|
Effects of Acute Modulation of Blood Pressure
Normotensive Subjects
Hemodynamic changes during infusion of Ang II in normotensive subjects are summarized in Table 2. The highest dose of Ang II (300 ng min–1) increased MAP from 83±1 to 103±2 mm Hg, this value being similar to the mean baseline MAP in hypertensive subjects (104±2 mm Hg). Ang II increased PWV and decreased carotid distensibility (Figure 1; each P<0.001 for trend). At the highest dose of Ang II, when MAP in the normotensive subjects was similar to that in hypertensive subjects at baseline, the mean value of PWV in normotensive subjects approached that in hypertensive subjects (9.4±0.3 versus 9.9±0.4 m s–1; P not significant). Carotid distensibility, however, remained significantly greater in normotensive subjects than the mean baseline value in hypertensive subjects, even when blood pressure in the normotensive subjects was elevated to the level of that in hypertensive subjects (2.7±0.24 versus 1.9±0.13 mm Hg–1x10–3; P<0.01). Infusion of NTG in normotensive subjects reduced MAP from 84±2 to 70±1 mm Hg (P<0.001), and this was associated with a significant reduction in PWV (from 8.1±0.3 to 7.7±0.3 m s–1; P<0.05). The relationship between the change in PWV and change in MAP produced by NTG and Ang II was curvilinear (Figure 2) with a greater change in PWV at higher MAP, a similar relationship to that noted in previous studies using other vasoactive drugs to modulate MAP.12 There was no significant change in carotid distensibility in response to NTG, but 95% CIs for this (–0.4 to 0.7 mm Hg–1x10–3) included the change predicted from the change in MAP and the PWV versus MAP relationship (0.4 mm Hg–1x10–3), this being calculated from the best-fit curve shown in Figure 2 and by assuming an inverse square relationship between distensibility and PWV.
|
|
); Ang II, 75 ng min–1 (
); Ang II, 150 ng min–1 (
); and Ang II, 300 ng min–1 (
). Values in hypertensive subjects during infusion of vehicle are also shown (•). b, Carotid-femoral PWV and carotid distensibility in hypertensive subjects during infusion of saline (•); NTG, 10 µg min–1 (
); NTG, 30 µg min–1 (
); and NTG, 100 µg min–1 (
). Values in normotensive subjects during infusion of vehicle are also shown (
|
Hypertensive Subjects
Hemodynamic changes during NTG infusion in hypertensive subjects are summarized in Table 2. The highest dose of NTG reduced MAP from 104±2 to 82±2 mm Hg, a value similar to baseline MAP in normotensive subjects (84±2 mm Hg). Despite this reduction in MAP, there was no significant effect of NTG to lower PWV or to increase carotid distensibility. At the highest dose of NTG, when blood pressure in the hypertensive subjects was similar to baseline blood pressure in normotensive subjects, the difference between PWV in hypertensive and normotensive subjects (9.9±0.5 versus 8.0±0.3 m s–1; difference: 1.9±0.6 m s–1) was similar to that between the 2 groups at their usual operating blood pressures (9.9±0.4 versus 8.0±0.3 m s–1; difference: 1.9±0.5 m s–1). The difference between carotid distensibility in hypertensive and normotensive subjects, at the same MAP (1.9±0.12 versus 3.7±0.3 mm Hg–1x10–3; difference: 1.8±0.3 mm Hg–1x10–3) was also similar to that between the 2 groups at their usual operating blood pressures (1.9±0.13 versus 3.7±0.3 mm Hg–1x10–3; difference: 1.8± 0.3 mm Hg–1x10–3). Thus, PWV remained 24% (95% CI: 10% to 38%) greater and distensibility 48% (95% CI: 31% to 63%) lower in hypertensive subjects than in normotensive subjects when compared at the same MAP (equal to that in the normotensive subjects). There was no significant interaction between age and response to NTG, nor between heart rate and response to NTG.
Relationship Among Carotid Distensibility, Diastolic Diameter, and Compliance
Values of carotid pulse pressure, diastolic diameter, distensibility, and compliance in normotensive and hypertensive subjects at baseline and at similar MAP (achieved by infusion of Ang II in normotensive subjects and NTG in hypertensive subjects) are shown in Table 3. During infusion of NTG, carotid distensibility in hypertensive subjects remained constant as a result of a parallel reduction of pulse pressure and distension and also an increase in diameter. The increase in diameter led to a significant increase in cross-sectional compliance despite the lack of change in distensibility.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Arterial stiffness is strongly associated with age and blood pressure but not with other risk factors. Indeed, several studies have shown a weak association, inverse association, or no association between large artery PWV and risk factors including smoking, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes.1,2,24–28 In the present study and despite any clinical evidence of atherosclerosis or plaque deposition in the carotid arteries, there were marked differences in carotid and carotid-femoral stiffness between hypertensive and normotensive control subjects. This is consistent with the overwhelming importance of blood pressure as a determinant of arterial stiffness. If measured at the same site, the inverse square relationship between distensibility and PWV would be expected to lead to a 2-fold greater difference in distensibility than in PWV between the hypertensive and control groups, and in hypertensive subjects, carotid-femoral PWV was 24% greater and carotid distensibility 47% lower than in normotensive subjects. Although methodologic influences cannot be excluded, these increases in stiffness in the carotid and carotid-femoral path suggest that both territories are affected by hypertension to a similar degree.
Whether the effect of elevated MAP alone accounts for increased arterial stiffness in subjects with hypertension is a fundamental question that has received surprisingly little attention. Early work on rat aortae suggested that, at normal operating pressures (ie, usual MAP), young hypertensive rats actually have less stiff vessels, as determined by calculation of Young’s incremental elastic modulus ([Einc] a measure of the intrinsic elasticity of the vessel wall) than normotensive controls.10 A study of the static and dynamic mechanical properties of the carotid artery in rats suggested that, whereas in static conditions, hypertensive rats had stiffer vessels, when measured in dynamic conditions, the stiffness of the 2 groups was similar.29 Human studies using mathematical techniques to compare isobaric distensibility (distensibility at the same operating pressure) have shown similar carotid artery distensibility in hypertensive subjects compared with normotensive subjects at the same blood pressure.14,30 In these studies, simultaneous pressure and diameter data were acquired to create a pressure–diameter hysteresis loop. Hysteresis was then eliminated by iteration, the resultant pressure–diameter curve fitted to a logarithmic model and carotid distensibility evaluated at a pressure common to both hypertensive and control groups. A similar approach using an arc tangent function to model the pressure–diameter relationship and to calculate Einc has suggested similar intrinsic stiffness of the carotid artery wall in hypertensive subjects and control subjects when measured at the same pressure.15 Comparison of distensibility at the same pressure relies on an overlap of arterial pressure in the 2 groups (ie, a measurement taken close to diastolic in the hypertensive group and close to systolic in the normotensive group). The interpretation of the result is, therefore, critically dependent on assumptions regarding the form of the pressure–diameter relation during the cardiac cycle and whether this differs in hypertensive and normotensive subjects. Calculation of Einc requires measurement of wall thickness and assumes that elasticity of the arterial wall is constant throughout the thickness of the wall and that intima–medial thickness (used to estimate the relevant wall thickness) is representative of the part of the wall that determines its overall elastic behavior. In reality, increased intima–medial thickness in hypertension may result from both intimal and medial thickening.31
In the present study, we have used an entirely different approach, that of pharmacological manipulation of blood pressure with functional measures of stiffness. PWV is particularly important as a functional measure of stiffness, because it is known to predict future cardiovascular outcome. In interpreting the results of these studies, it is important to consider direct, blood pressure–independent effects of vasoactive drugs on arterial stiffness mediated through a change in the tone of smooth muscle and resulting change in diameter. In particular, there is the possibility that dilation of smooth muscle accompanying blood pressure reduction alters the load on the arterial wall resulting in a null effect on distensibility. This is a theoretical possibility if smooth muscle is arranged in parallel with stiffer elements, such as collagen. However, in studies in the brachial artery where smooth muscle tone and transmural pressure can be manipulated independently, incremental elastic modulus and PWV depend mainly on transmural pressure despite large changes in brachial artery diameter induced by alterations in smooth muscle tone.16,17,32 Bank et al32 have suggested that the artery behaves as if smooth muscle elements are in series with stiffer elements, so that relaxation of smooth muscle by NTG increases intrinsic elasticity, distensibility, and PWV (although effects of transmural pressure predominate). It is likely that the behavior of muscular and elastic arteries will differ with less effect of smooth muscle relaxation in more elastic arteries. Previous studies in the sheep iliac artery suggest that the effect of NTG, in the absence of any change in blood pressure, is to decrease PWV by &5% for high local concentrations of NTG.18 In human studies, we have previously found no evidence of a blood pressure–independent effect on carotid-femoral PWV when using drugs that have differential effects on smooth muscle tone.12 Thus, direct blood pressure–independent effects of NTG on large artery stiffness would either produce no detectable change or a small decrease in PWV. Similarly, direct effects of Ang II would be expected to either produce no detectable change or a small increase in PWV.
The findings of the present study in normotensive subjects confirm the potential importance of mean arterial blood pressure in determining functional stiffness. In normotensive subjects, intravenous infusion of Ang II increased in MAP and produced a concomitant increase in both carotid-femoral PWV and carotid stiffness. Similarly, reduction of MAP with NTG reduced carotid-femoral PWV. The decrease in PWV was of smaller magnitude than the increase but was consistent with the expected decrease given the curvilinear relation between PWV and MAP observed in previous studies involving the acute modulation of blood pressure in normotensive subjects.12,20 When MAP was increased to a level similar to that in hypertensive subjects, carotid-femoral PWV and carotid stiffness approached that in the hypertensive subjects. However, at the same MAP, PWV still tended to be lower in normotensive subjects compared with hypertensive subjects, and carotid stiffness was significantly lower (distensibility greater) in normotensive subjects compared with hypertensive subjects. This suggests that, although the level of blood pressure may contribute to elevated functional stiffness in hypertensive subjects, additional factors, such as a structural alteration in the wall, are implicated.
The most persuasive evidence that the difference in functional stiffness between normotensive and hypertensive subjects relates to a difference in structural properties between the 2 groups is provided by the reduction of blood pressure in hypertensive subjects by NTG. Despite reducing MAP by 22 mm Hg to a level similar to that in normotensive subjects, NTG had no significant effect on carotid-femoral PWV or carotid stiffness. Carotid distensibility remained 48% lower and PWV 24% higher in hypertensive subjects compared with normotensive subjects. There was a small but significant increase in heart rate after NTG and in other studies, using pacing to alter heart rate over a wide range, we and others have found PWV to increase modestly with heart rate (0.05 m/s per unit change in heart rate).22 However, the change in heart rate observed in the present study (4 to 8 min–1 for the highest 2 doses of NTG) would be expected to have only a minor influence on PWV, and we found no significant association between PWV and heart rate. Because the direct effect of NTG on the arterial wall is, if anything, to reduce stiffness, the lack of change in PWV in hypertensive subjects after normalizing blood pressure strongly suggests that difference in stiffness between hypertensive and normotensive subjects is not explained by the level of the blood pressure but by a structural change induced by sustained hypertension. Indeed, because acute blood pressure reduction had no observable effect on PWV, these results suggest that structural alterations in hypertensive subjects may render the wall less sensitive to acute changes in blood pressure and that elevated stiffness in hypertension is almost entirely attributable to a structural change. Although treatment with NTG did not reduce PWV or increase distensibility in hypertensive subjects, it did result in an increase in cross-sectional compliance consistent with previous observations with isosorbide dinitrate.33 This increase in cross-sectional compliance was because of an increase in arterial diameter rather than a change in the intrinsic elasticity of the arterial wall (this being related to PWV and distensibility). However, an increase in compliance is likely to be of functional importance, because it will reduce pulse pressure. It is notable that novel NO donors have an even greater effect on brachial artery compliance and distensibility than classic nitrovasodilators,34 and it is possible that such drugs could be used to increase compliance and to reduce pulse pressure.
Perspectives
Previous studies using mathematical techniques to compare large artery stiffness at the same blood pressure have suggested that elevated stiffness in hypertension may be explained solely by the level of blood pressure. In the present study, we normalized blood pressure in hypertensive subjects by infusion of NTG, and there was no detectable reduction in arterial stiffness: carotid-femoral PWV remained 24% (95% CI: 10% to 38%) higher and carotid distensibility 48% (95% CI: 31% to 63%) lower in hypertensive compared with normotensive subjects. Because blood pressure–independent effects of NTG are, if anything, to reduce stiffness, these results indicate that elevated carotid and aortic stiffness in hypertensive subjects is not explained by elevated blood pressure but relates to structural change in the arterial wall. They suggest that arterial stiffness is not simply a "measure of blood pressure" but rather a measure of the longer-term influence of blood pressure on the arterial wall as observed in animal models of hypertension.35 Secondly, they suggest that any reduction in stiffness that accompanies a reduction in blood pressure is associated with structural remodeling, and it will be important to characterize the time course of such an effect and the degree to which it is determined by the level of blood pressure control. Subjects in this study had elevated blood pressure for 12 months despite treatment, and results in untreated subjects with hypertension of shorter duration or in subjects with hypertension that has been well controlled on treatment might differ.
In conclusion, in subjects with essential hypertension that is not controlled despite antihypertensive treatment, acute reduction of blood pressure by NTG to normotensive levels does not normalize large artery distensibility or PWV. Large artery stiffness in such subjects is likely to be elevated as a result of structural changes in the arterial wall.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the Charitable Foundation of Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital. S.C.M. was funded by Micro Medical Ltd.
Disclosures
None.
Received February 3, 2006; first decision February 22, 2006; accepted July 12, 2006.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
- Avolio AP, Chen SG, Wang RP, Zhang CL, Li MF, O’Rourke MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a northern Chinese urban community. Circulation. 1983; 68: 50–58.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Avolio AP, Deng Fq, Li WQ, Luo YF, Huang ZD, Xing LF, O’Rourke MF. Effects of aging on arterial distensibility in populations with high and low prevalence of hypertension: comparison between urban and rural communities in China. Circulation. 1985; 71: 202–210.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, Ducimetiere P, Benetos A. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1236–1241.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Boutouyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, Gautier I, Benetos A, Lacolley P, Laurent S. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 10–15.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Laurent S, Katsahian S, Fassot C, Tropeano AI, Gautier I, Laloux B, Boutouyrie P. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1203–1206.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2434–2439.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cruickshank K, Riste L, Anderson SG, Wright JS, Dunn G, Gosling RG. Aortic pulse-wave velocity and its relationship to mortality in diabetes and glucose intolerance: an integrated index of vascular function? Circulation. 2002; 106: 2085–2090.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Sutton-Tyrrell K, Najjar SS, Boudreau RM, Venkitachalam L, Kupelian V, Simonsick EM, Havlik R, Lakatta EG, Spurgeon H, Kritchevsky S, Pahor M, Bauer D, Newman A. Elevated aortic pulse wave velocity, a marker of arterial stiffness, predicts cardiovascular events in well–functioning older adults. Circulation. 2005; 111: 3384–3390.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries. Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. London, United Kingdom: Arnold; 1998.
- Berry CL, Greenwald SE. Effects of hypertension on the static mechanical properties and chemical composition of the rat aorta. Cardiovasc Res. 1976; 10: 437–451.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Histand MB, Anliker M. Influence of flow and pressure on wave propagation in the canine aorta. Circ Res. 1973; 32: 524–529.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Stewart AD, Millasseau SC, Kearney MT, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ. Effects of inhibition of basal nitric oxide synthesis on carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and augmentation index in humans. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 915–918.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Laurent S, Lacolley P, Girerd X, Caviezel B, Beck L, Challande P, Safar M. Arterial compliance is not diminished in hypertensive patients when compared at the same level of blood pressure [in French]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1994; 87: 1069–1072.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Laurent S, Caviezel B, Beck L, Girerd X, Billaud E, Boutouyrie P, Hoeks A, Safar M. Carotid artery distensibility and distending pressure in hypertensive humans. Hypertension. 1994; 23: 878–883.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bussy C, Boutouyrie P, Lacolley P, Challande P, Laurent S. Intrinsic stiffness of the carotid arterial wall material in essential hypertensives. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 1049–1054.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bank AJ, Kaiser DR, Rajala S, Cheng A. In vivo human brachial artery elastic mechanics: effects of smooth muscle relaxation. Circulation. 1999; 100: 41–47.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kinlay S, Creager MA, Fukumoto M, Hikita H, Fang JC, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide regulates arterial elasticity in human arteries in vivo. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 1049–1053.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Wilkinson IB, Qasem A, McEniery CM, Webb DJ, Avolio AP, Cockcroft JR. Nitric oxide regulates local arterial distensibility in vivo. Circulation. 2002; 105: 213–217.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Yaginuma T, Avolio A, O’Rourke M, Nichols W, Morgan JJ, Roy P, Baron D, Branson J, Fenley M. Effect of glyceryl trinitrate on peripheral arteries alters left ventricular hydraulic load in man. Cardiovasc Res. 1986; 20: 153–160.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kelly RP, Millasseau SC, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ. Vasoactive drugs influence aortic augmentation index independently of pulse wave velocity in healthy men. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1429–1433.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - O’Rourke MF, Staessen JA, Vlachopoulos C, Duprez D, Plante GE. Clinical applications of arterial stiffness; definitions and reference values. Am J Hypertens. 2002; 15: 426–444.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Millasseau SC, Stewart AD, Patel SJ, Redwood SR, Chowienczyk PJ. Evaluation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: influence of timing algorithm and heart rate. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 222–226.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Millasseau SC, Davies S, Patel S, Redwood S, Chowienczyk PJ. Comparison of PulseTrace PWV and SphygmoCor PWV. J Hypertens. 2005; 23: S348.
- Lehmann ED, Watts GF, Fatemi-Langroudi B, Gosling RG. Aortic compliance in young patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Clin Sci (Colch). 1992; 83: 717–721.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ahlgren AR, Lanne T, Wollmer P, Sonesson B, Hansen F, Sundkvist G. Increased arterial stiffness in women, but not in men, with IDDM. Diabetologia. 1995; 38: 1082–1089.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Asmar R. Alterations of pulse wave velocity in clinical conditions. In: Asmar R, ed. Arterial Stiffness and Pulse Wave Velocity. Paris, France: Elsevier; 1999; 89–134.
- Mahmud A, Feely J. Effect of smoking on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure amplification. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 183–187.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - De Angelis L, Millasseau SC, Smith A, Viberti G, Jones RH, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ. Sex differences in age-related stiffening of the aorta in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 67–71.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Lichtenstein O, Safar ME, Mathieu E, Poitevin P, Levy BI. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of the carotid artery from normotensive and hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 346–350.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Armentano R, Megnien JL, Simon A, Bellenfant F, Barra J, Levenson J. Effects of hypertension on viscoelasticity of carotid and femoral arteries in humans. Hypertension. 1995; 26: 48–54.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - van Bortel LM. What does intima-media thickness tell us? J Hypertens. 2005; 23: 37–39.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bank AJ, Wang H, Holte JE, Mullen K, Shammas R, Kubo SH. Contribution of collagen, elastin, and smooth muscle to in vivo human brachial artery wall stress and elastic modulus. Circulation. 1996; 94: 3263–3270.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Laurent S, Arcaro G, Benetos A, Lafleche A, Hoeks A, Safar M. Mechanism of nitrate-induced improvement on arterial compliance depends on vascular territory. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992; 19: 641–649.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- van Bortel LM, Spek JJ, Balkestein EJ, Sardina M, Struijker Boudier HA. Is it possible to develop drugs that act more selectively on large arteries? J Hypertens. 1999; 17: 701–705.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Cox RH. Basis for the altered arterial wall mechanics in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension. 1981; 3: 485–495.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Related Article:
- Arterial Blood Pressure and Stiffness in Hypertension: Is Arterial Structure Important?
- Rupert A. Payne and David J. Webb
Hypertension 2006 48: 366-367.[Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Karalliedde, A. Smith, L. DeAngelis, V. Mirenda, A. Kandra, J. Botha, P. Ferber, and G. Viberti Valsartan Improves Arterial Stiffness in Type 2 Diabetes Independently of Blood Pressure Lowering Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1617 - 1623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Munir, B. Jiang, A. Guilcher, S. Brett, S. Redwood, M. Marber, and P. Chowienczyk Exercise reduces arterial pressure augmentation through vasodilation of muscular arteries in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1645 - H1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Payne and D. J. Webb Arterial Blood Pressure and Stiffness in Hypertension: Is Arterial Structure Important? Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 366 - 367. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||