Published online before print December 11, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000250394.05703.06
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2007;49:19.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial Commentaries |
Hypertension Control
Trends, Approaches, and Goals
From the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Correspondence to Theodore A. Kotchen, MD, Department of Medicine Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226. E-mail tkotchen{at}mcw.edu
Hypertension is a major contributor to the global disease burden.1 Overall, according to recent estimates, the worldwide prevalence of hypertension in 2000 was 
26%, totaling 1 billion people.2 Because a larger proportion of the world’s population is expected to be older in 2025, hypertension prevalence has been projected to increase to 
29% by that time. However, there is considerable variation among countries and geographic regions for the reported prevalence of hypertension (5% to 70%) and hypertension control rates (5% to 58%).2,3 Although hypertension is more prevalent in economically developed countries, the larger population of developing countries results in a considerably larger absolute number of individuals affected.
Based on an analysis of cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) between 1960 and 1991, age adjusted hypertension prevalence (blood pressure 140/90 mm Hg) in US adults reportedly decreased from 29.7% to 20.4%; hypertension awareness rates increased from 51% to 73%, and hypertension control rates increased from 10% to 29%.4 In a more recent analysis of NHANES data, it was estimated that between 1988–1991 and 1999–2000 hypertension prevalence in the adult US population actually increased from 25.0% to 28.7%, an estimated 58.4 million individuals.5 Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure 140 mm Hg, a diastolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg, or taking antihypertensive medications. Increasing age, increasing body mass index, and non-Hispanic black race were independently associated with the increased rates of hypertension. In each of these 2 time periods, hypertension awareness rates were 69%, although overall hypertension control rates increased from 24.6% to 31.0%. This increase in hypertension prevalence is in accord with results from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.6 A subsequent analysis of NHANES data, using a more liberal definition of hypertension (including persons not on antihypertensive medications with blood pressures <140/90 mm Hg but who had been told at least twice by a health professional that they had hypertension), indicated that the total hypertension prevalence rate in the US in 1999–2000 was 31.3%.7
In the current issue of Hypertension, Ong et al8 report another analysis of NHANES data regarding hypertension prevalence, awareness, and control in US adults between 1999 and 2004. Overall, between 1999–2000 and 2003–2004, hypertension prevalence increased from 26.8% to 29.3%, although this difference was not statistically significant. Hypertension awareness between these 2 time periods increased significantly from 68.7% to 75.7%, and hypertension control rates increased from 29.2% to 36.8%. The increases in awareness and control were most prominent in individuals aged 60 years. The overall hypertension prevalence and control rates for 1999–2000 are similar to results of previous analyses of NHANES data.5 The striking and new observation in this report is the increase in hypertension control between 1999–2000 and 2003–2004.
Taken together, these analyses of NHANES data indicate a high and perhaps increasing prevalence of hypertension in the adult US population. It seems reasonable to suggest that the increasing prevalence of obesity is a contributing factor. High rates of hypertension were also associated with age and with non-Hispanic black ethnicity. On a more positive note, hypertension awareness and control rates have consistently improved over time since 1960. In addition, mean blood pressures of the US population decreased by 10/5 mm Hg between 1960 and 1994, and the age-adjusted mortality rate for stroke and coronary heart disease declined by 60% and 53%, respectively.9 Cardiovascular mortality has continued to decline since 1994, although at a less steep rate. A number of factors have contributed to these favorable trends, including a better understanding of the risks of "benign" hypertension and the benefits of treatment, the increased availability of effective antihypertensive agents, the recommendations of professional groups for lifestyle interventions and therapeutic targets for blood pressure control, and a number of federal and community-based high blood pressure prevention and control efforts.
Since the 1970s, community-based programs have been instrumental in raising awareness, increasing knowledge, and promoting health behavior change to improve blood pressure control, particularly for poor, undeserved, and uninsured individuals. As recently reviewed, blood pressure control strategies at the national, state, and community levels, involving a spectrum of health care providers and community health care workers, have been shown to increase awareness, as well as to improve adherence to lifestyle interventions and drug therapy.10
The National High Blood Pressure Education Program was established in 1972 as a cooperative effort among professional and voluntary health agencies, state health departments, and community groups. The goal of the program, which is coordinated by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, is to reduce death and disability related to high blood pressure through programs of professional, patient, and public education.9 By working to translate research into practice, the National High Blood Pressure Education Program has developed and promulgated guidelines for the evaluation and management of hypertension and has recommended therapeutic targets for hypertension control. Between 1977 and 2003, the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure has issued 7 reports, and with successive reports, lower blood pressure levels have been recommended both for defining hypertension and for targets of hypertension control.
In January 2000, the Department of Health and Human Services launched Healthy People 2010, a national health promotion and disease prevention initiative.11 The Table lists the 1988–1994 status of hypertension control in the US (data sources include NHANES, the Center for Disease Control, the National Center for Health Statistics, and the National Health Interview Survey), as well as the blood pressure–related goals for Healthy People 2010. The targets for 2010 are aggressive, and all may not be achievable by that time. However, if hypertension control continues to improve at previously reported rates, including the recent increase in control reported by Ong et al,8 a hypertension control rate of 50% by 2010 may be an attainable goal. Although there is reason to be optimistic that previous trends of increasing hypertension awareness and control will continue, achieving these goals will require addressing multiple patient, provider, and health system barriers to effective blood pressure control. Recent meta-analyses have reviewed effective approaches for reducing barriers and facilitating blood pressure control.12,13
|
It is likely that improved hypertension control has contributed to decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the US. Nevertheless, hypertension prevalence remains high, and hypertension control rates are unacceptably low. From research, patient care, and public health perspectives, multifaceted strategies will be required to more effectively prevent and control hypertension. Approaches should include population-based preventive strategies, as well as targeting high-risk populations and identifying and effectively treating high risk individuals. To paraphrase Robert Frost, "we have miles to go before we sleep."
 |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Source of Funding
This work was funded by grant HL070111, National Institutes of Health.
Disclosures
None.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
|
References |
|---|
 Top References |
|---|
- Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Hoorn SV, Murray CJL and the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002; 360: 1347–1360.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005; 365: 217–223.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kearney P, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Whelton P, He J. Worldwide prevalence of hypertension: a systematic review. J Hypertens. 2004; 22: 11–19.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Burt V, Cutler JA, Higgins M, Horan MJ, Labarthe D, Whelton P, Brown C, Roccella EJ. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the adults US population: data from the Health Examination Surveys, 1960–1991. Hypertension. 1995; 26: 60–69.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA. 2003; 290: 199–206.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ayla C, Greenlund KJ, Croft JB. State-specific trends in self-reported blood pressure screening and high blood pressure—United States, 1991–1999 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002; 51: 456–460.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fields LE, Burt VL, Cutler JA, Hughes J, Rocella EJ, Sorlie P. The burden of adult hypertension in the United States, 1999 to 2000: a rising tide. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 398–404.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ong KL, Cheung BMY, Man YB, Lau CP, Lam KSL. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among United States adults 1999–2004. Hypertension. 2007: 49; 1: 69–75.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/about/nhbpep/nhbp_pd.htm. Accessed November 18, 2006.
- Welch VLL, Hill MN. Effective strategies for blood pressure control. Cardiol Clin. 2002; 20: 321–333.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2000. Available at: http://www.health.gov/healthypeople. Accessed November 18, 2006.
- Fahey T, Schroeder K, Ebrahim S. Interventions to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension (review). In: The Cochrane Collaboration. Issue 2. Wiley Publishers; 2006.
- Walsh J, McDonald KM, Shojania KG. Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies. In Shojania KG, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Owens DK, eds. Hypertension Care, vol. 3. Technical Review 9 (Prepared by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005: 1–108.
Related Article:
- Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999–2004
- Kwok Leung Ong, Bernard M.Y. Cheung, Yu Bun Man, Chu Pak Lau, and Karen S.L. Lam
Hypertension 2007 49: 69-75.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. M. Hakim Vascular Disease: The Tsunami of Health Care Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3296 - 3301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||