(Hypertension. 2007;49:1120.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Medicine and Biological Science (N.K., M.A., S.K., K.N., A.W., Y.A., T.M., M.K.), Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan; and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Dentistry (T.N., S.K., M.T.), Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Correspondence to Masashi Arai, Department of Medicine and Biological Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan. E-mail araim{at}showa.gunma-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: extracellular matrix hypertrophy cardiac function connective tissue growth factor natriuretic peptide
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Connective tissue growth factor (CCN2/CTGF) belongs to the CCN (Cyr61, CTGF, and Nov) family of immediate early genes, which are highly conserved among species.6 This cysteine-rich secreted protein may contribute to progressive fibrosis and excessive scarring in various systemic and local fibrotic diseases.6 Further, CTGF expression is increased in the hypertrophied and failing myocardium of experimental animal models.7,8 CTGF is also an essential mediator for the biological actions of TGF-ß6 and its downstream signal transduction elements.9 However, a recent in vitro study demonstrated that CTGF is 1 of the earliest growth factors transcriptionally induced by hypertrophic stimuli in cardiac myocytes (CMs).10
In this study, to confirm the involvement of CTGF in the myocardial fibrosis, we first investigated CTGF protein production in myocardial biopsy samples of patients with DHF. Secondly, by using the pressure overload rat model with a suprarenal abdominal aortic constriction (AC), which mimics a model of DHF,5 we determined and compared the temporal changes of CTGF, TGF-ß, and an antifibrotic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP).11 Because the collagen accumulation level is reflected by the balance of profibrotic factors and antifibrotic factors,12 we investigated their functional interactions, especially between CTGF and BNP, in the development of myocardial fibrosis and DHF.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Forty-six consecutive patients with normal or minimally impaired LV ejection fraction (>40%), estimated by echocardiography, who underwent endomyocardial biopsy of the LV-free wall in Gunma University Hospital were enrolled in this study (Table S1). All of the patients were clinically stable when the biopsy was performed. Of these patients, 31 patients who had a previous history of overt heart failure within the preceding year in the absence of impaired systolic function as estimated by echocardiography were designated as the DHF group. Another 15 patients without a previous history of heart failure were designated as the nonfailing (NF) group. The clinical diagnosis and the exclusion criteria are described in the expanded Methods section.
AC was established with a 21G silver clip13 in male Wistar rats (Charles River, Japan) weighing 250 to 300 g. Cell culture, histochemical analysis and immunostaining, hemodynamic measurements in AC rats, RNA isolation and Northern blot analysis, Western blotting, and statistical analysis are described in the expanded Methods section online.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
CTGF and BNP Gene Expression Are Coordinately Induced Early in the Development of Cardiac Hypertrophy and Fibrosis
To investigate the role of CTGF for the development of cardiac fibrosis, we created a rat pressure overload cardiac hypertrophy model by constricting the abdominal aorta. In accordance with the increase of systolic blood pressure, on day 4 after AC operation and until day 28, LV weight/body weight ratio, a parameter of LV hypertrophy, significantly increased (Table S2). Furthermore, MFA was significantly increased on day 14 after AC.
Quantitative Northern blot analysis revealed that CTGF mRNA levels peaked on day 1, whereas TGF-ß mRNA levels increased gradually and peaked on day 7 (Figure 2A). Furthermore, procollagen type 1
1 (COL1A1) mRNA levels were significantly increased on day 7 and continued to increase until day 28. Interestingly, the temporal course of changes in BNP mRNA was similar to that of CTGF mRNA, particularly from day 1 to day 7 (N=22; r=0.836; P<0.001; Figure 2B and 2D).
|
High CTGF/BNP Expression Ratio Is Associated With Myocardial Fibrosis and Ventricular Stiffness at a Later Stage of Cardiac Hypertrophy
Although a correlation between CTGF and BNP mRNA expression was observed during the entire experimental period (N=69; r=0.804; P<0.001; Figure not shown), the correlation was weaker between day 14 and day 28 (N=19; r=0.645; P<0.001; Figure 2C and 2E) when compared with the early stage of cardiac hypertrophy (day 1 to day 7; r=0.836; Figure 2B). As shown in Figure 2C, some rats expressed disproportionately abundant CTGF mRNA. Furthermore, those rats with high CTGF mRNA levels relative to BNP mRNA levels also showed marked upregulation of COL1A1 mRNA (Figure 2E, lanes 4 and 6). By contrast, rats with proportional increases in both CTGF and BNP mRNA levels showed only mild upregulation of COL1A1 mRNA (Figure 2E, lanes 3 and 5). Finally, rats with low CTGF mRNA levels relative to BNP mRNA levels showed low levels of COL1A1 mRNA (Figure 2E, lane 7).
Hemodynamic analysis was performed in rats on day 28. LV contractility indices, calculated using the pressure-volume relationship, were comparable when comparing sham-operated and AC rats (Table S3). Diastolic indexes, that is, time constant of relaxation (
) and the slope of end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR slope), were significantly higher in the AC rats than in the sham-operated rats.
Representative hemodynamic data and histochemical staining of CTGF in a sham-operated and 2 AC rats with comparable or disproportionate mRNA levels for CTGF and BNP are illustrated in Figure 3A and Figure S1. A rat with high CTGF levels related to BNP mRNA levels showed a steeper slope of EDPVR (Figure 3A), a high E/A ratio in Doppler echocardiography (Figure S1A), severe interstitial fibrosis, and positive immunostaining against CTGF in CM (Figure S1B) when compared with a sham-operated rat and a rat with comparable mRNA levels of CTGF and BNP.
|
To further characterize hearts with high CTGF mRNA levels relative to BNP mRNA levels, AC rats were classified according to the upper or lower 50th percentile groups of the CTGF/BNP expression ratio on day 28. The mean ratio of the CTGF/BNP mRNA level was 1.2 (Figure 3B). AC rats with a higher CTGF/BNP mRNA ratio (n=7) showed elevated EDPVR slope, higher E/A ratio, and increased MFA (Figure 3B) relative to AC rats with the lower CTGF/BNP ratio (n=7). By contrast, LV relaxation (
), contractility (ejection factor), or LV hypertrophy (LV weight/body weight ratio) was similar when comparing the 2 groups (Figure 3B). The protein content of sarcomeric
-actin was also similar when comparing the 2 groups (Figure 3B). Interestingly, the CTGF/BNP expression ratio correlated with EDPVR slope (r=0.720; P<0.001; Figure S2) and with COL1A1 mRNA expression (r=0.458; P<0.001; Figure S2). The ratio also significantly correlated with the E/A ratio, expression levels of procollagen type 3
1 (COL3A1), and MFA (Table S4). On the other hand, LV contractility indexes,
, and mRNA expressions of TGFß and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) 2a were not correlated with the ratio (Table S4). Finally, plasma concentration of Aldo was significantly elevated in AC rats with a higher CTGF/BNP ratio (Figure S3), whereas plasma TGF-ß and ET-1 concentration was not significantly different when comparing the 2 groups.
CTGF Is Secreted From CM
The molecular basis of the production of CTGF in the heart and the functional interaction with other neurohumoral factors was investigated using rat neonatal primary CM and cardiac fibroblasts (CFBs). Immunofluorescent study with anti-CTGF antibody revealed production of CTGF in cultured CMs (Figure 4A) and CFBs (vimentin-positive cells; Figure S4). Administration of recombinant CTGF resulted in a dose-dependent increase in COL1A1 mRNA levels in cultured CFB (Figure 4B). Profibrotic stimulation with TGF-ß, ET1, and Aldo resulted in increased CTGF production and release into the culture medium from the myocytes (Figure 4C). Furthermore, conditioned medium from these CMs enhanced COL1A1 mRNA levels in CFBs (Figure 4C), suggesting that CMs may regulate collagen production in CFBs. When the TGF-ßtreated medium was preincubated with anti-CTGF antibody, COL1A1 mRNA induction was abolished in CFBs (Figure 4D). Pretreatment of the CM-cultured medium with both anti-CTGF and anti-TGF-ß antibodies further suppressed the COL1A1 mRNA, suggesting that the induction of the COL1A1 gene by TGF-ß and even the basal expression level of the COL1A1 gene in CFBs are mediated through TGF-ßdependent and CTGF-dependent pathways.
|
Common and Uncommon Stimuli Triggering CTGF and BNP Gene Transcription in CMs
To further characterize the correlation between CTGF and BNP mRNA induction in AC rats, the role of mechanohmoral and neurohumoral stimuli on CTGF and BNP induction was investigated. Cyclic stretch induced a rapid increase in CTGF and BNP mRNA levels (Figure 5A). Furthermore, G protein-coupled receptor ligands, such as ET1 (Figure 5B), norepinephrine, and angiotensin II (Figure S5A), increased CTGF and BNP levels in a dose-dependent manner. By contrast, Aldo and TGF-ß stimulation resulted in increases in CTGF mRNA levels and decreases or no effect on BNP mRNA levels (Figure 5B). The differential effect of TGF-ß and Aldo on CTGF and BNP mRNA levels was also confirmed by comparing the temporal induction pattern of these genes by TGF-ß and Aldo with that induced by ET1 (Figure 5C).
|
BNP Suppresses CTGF Expression in CMs
Because BNP and TGF-ß have opposing biological effects,14 the effect of BNP on CTGF expression was investigated. CTGF mRNA levels decreased 2 hours after administration of synthetic BNP (Figure S5B). Synthetic BNP-mediated inhibition of CTGF expression was completely blocked by the protein kinase G inhibitor KT5823, suggesting that the BNP-cGMP-protein kinase G pathway plays a critical role in regulating CTGF expression in CM (Figure S5C). Furthermore, the effect of BNP was also evident in the context of enhanced production of the CTGF protein in response to profibrotic stimuli, such as TGF-ß, ET1, and Aldo (Figure 5D).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CMs Produce CTGF
CTGF is overexpressed in numerous fibrotic diseases, and the degree of overexpression correlates with the severity of disease.6 Collagen is mainly produced by fibroblasts in many organs. However, various other cells, including fibroblasts, secrete humoral factors to initiate collagen production in fibroblasts.4,5 Although previous reports mainly focused on CFBs as CTGF-producing cells in the heart,15 the present study demonstrated that a significant amount of CTGF is produced by CMs in the hypertrophied rat heart and in the hearts of patients with DHF.
Interestingly, cultured CFB had higher basal levels of CTGF mRNA than CM (Figure S4A). However, unlike the significant induction in CM, CTGF mRNA levels in CFBs were only minimally affected by extrinsic stimuli (CFBs, Figure S4B; CMs, Figure 5B), which is consistent with observations by Kemp et al.10 The inducibility of CTGF in CMs, along with the fact that BNP, an antifibrotic factor, is also produced by CMs, raises the possibility that CTGF produced in CMs regulates collagen production in CFBs. Indeed, the present study demonstrated that CTGF was secreted into the cultured medium of CMs and that this conditioned medium induced increases in COL1A1 mRNA levels in CFBs (Figure 4C). In addition, neutralization of conditioned medium with CTGF antibody sufficiently blunted the fibrotic signal from CMs to CFBs (Figure 4D). These data suggest that there is molecular communication in a paracrine manner between CMs and CFBs and that this process regulates production of collagen.
CTGF/BNP Balance Regulates Cardiac Fibrosis
Because we could not obtain a well-working antibody for BNP immunostaining, we were unable to estimate the BNP protein level in myocardial biopsy samples. However, the percentage of CTGF-positive staining cells in biopsy samples correlated with the plasma BNP level (r=0.41; P<0.05; Figure not shown). A close correlation between CTGF and BNP mRNA induction was also seen in the pressure overload rat heart and in cultured CMs under cell stretch or stimulation with G protein-coupled receptor ligands. Although the precise mechanisms for this induction were not investigated in this study, preliminary studies demonstrated that the ET1-induced increase in CTGF and BNP mRNA levels was blocked by inhibitors of mitogen-activating protein kinases, protein kinase C, and protein kinase A (data not shown). These data suggest that coordinated expression of the CTGF and BNP genes may be mediated by these signaling pathways.
Most importantly, the CTGF/BNP ratio in CM significantly correlated with indices of fibrosis and diastolic function, such as the slope of EDPVR, E/A ratio, COL1A1 mRNA levels, and MFA (Figure 3 and Table S4). Furthermore, AC rats with comparable levels of CTGF mRNA and BNP mRNA expression showed mild production of CTGF protein and sparse fibrosis in the myocardium. Sarcomeric
-actin content was not different between the high CTGF/BNP ratio group and the comparable ratio group, which suggests that myocyte loss is not responsible for the change of the ratio (Figure 3B). SERCA2a is a principal protein responsible for the initiation of the diastolic phase through its ability to remove cytoplasmic Ca2+.2 However, SERCA2a mRNA level was not correlated with the CTGF/BNP ratio (Table S4). These data suggest that the CTGF/BNP ratio does not associate with LV diastolic function, which is related to Ca2+ removal from cytoplasm.
The identity of upstream factors responsible for the disproportionate expression of CTGF and BNP in CMs remains unclear. AC causes severe hypertension and increases in the levels of various neurohumoral factors, such as renin and angiotensin II.16 Interestingly, rats with a higher CTGF/BNP ratio had a higher plasma Aldo concentration and a tendency toward higher plasma TGF-ß and ET1 concentrations than the rats with a lower CTGF/BNP ratio (Figure S3). In addition, in vitro study demonstrated that Aldo and TGF-ß induced increases in CTGF mRNA but not in BNP mRNA in contrast to the response to cell stretch or G protein-coupled receptor ligands (Figure 5A through 5C). Therefore, at least in the present model, Aldo may be an upstream factor responsible for disproportionate CTGF expression.
In addition to the effect on body fluid homeostasis and blood pressure control, BNP can exert antihypertrophic and antifibrotic effects in the stressed myocardium.11 The present study demonstrated that BNP suppressed basal CTGF expression level in CMs via its effects on protein kinase G (Figure S4C). The effect of BNP on CTGF expression was also observed under various profibrotic stimuli, such as ET1, Aldo, and TGF-ß (Figure 5D). Thus, the increase of CTGF and/or decrease of BNP in CMs may play a central role in the induction of excessive myocardial fibrosis and abnormal diastolic function (Figure 6).
|
To dissect the role of CTGF in the development of DHF, we used a rat pressure-overloaded model as a preserved systolic but impaired diastolic function model. Given that collagen accumulation is regulated by a balance of its synthesis and degradation, the pressure-overloaded model may be characterized as a "synthesis"-dominant model.12 On the other hand, myocardial infarction is a "accelerated synthesis and accelerated degradation" model with respect to collagen turnover.17 Myocardial infarction is another leading cause to provoke cardiac fibrosis. Therefore, our hypothesis should be also tested in the ischemic heart model, as well as the pressure-overloaded cardiac hypertrophy model.
Perspectives
CTGF is a secreted protein, and plasma CTGF concentration correlates with the severity of several systemic fibrotic disorders.18 Measurement of plasma CTGF concentrations is easier and less invasive than assessment of CTGF levels in biopsy samples. Furthermore, the present data suggest that plasma concentration of CTGF or the ratio of plasma concentration of CTGF:BNP may be a diagnostic marker for myocardial fibrosis. In addition, our data showing the inducibility of CTGF in CMs and the myocardial responsiveness to exogenously administered CTGF suggest that CTGF plays an active role in cardiac progressive fibrosis and, thus, becomes a good candidate molecule as a target of antifibrotic therapy.
Conclusions
The present study demonstrated the following: (1) production of CTGF from CMs is associated with the myocardial interstitial fibrosis and DHF; (2) increased CTGF expression relative to BNP expression triggers excessive cardiac fibrosis via BNP-mediated suppression of CTGF expression; and (3) Aldo and TGF-ß induce a disproportionate induction of CTGF and BNP expression, whereas a mechanical stretch of CM and G protein-coupled receptor ligands induces proportionate CTGF and BNP expression. These data suggest that CTGF is a key molecule in the process of cardiac fibrosis and that it may serve as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for cardiac fibrosis and DHF.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI B-17390224 and S-15109010) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Disclosures
None.
Received July 24, 2006; first decision August 13, 2006; accepted February 25, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Burstein, A. Maguy, R. Clement, H. Gosselin, F. Poulin, N. Ethier, J.-C. Tardif, T. E. Hebert, A. Calderone, and S. Nattel Effects of Resveratrol (trans-3,5,4'-Trihydroxystilbene) Treatment on Cardiac Remodeling following Myocardial Infarction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2007; 323(3): 916 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |