Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2007;49:e27
Published online before print March 5, 2007, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.087908
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/5/e27    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.087908v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlaich, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Esler, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlaich, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Esler, M. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation

(Hypertension. 2007;49:e27.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Is Reduced During Standard Treatment

Markus P. Schlaich; Elisabeth A. Lambert

Baker Heart Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

Paul A. Sobotka

ARDIAN Inc, Palo Alto, Calif

Gavin W. Lambert; Murray D. Esler

Baker Heart Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

To the Editor:

Sympathetic activation is of crucial importance for both the blood pressure increase and the high morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease.1 The mechanisms responsible for increased sympathetic outflow remain to be elucidated. In their latest of a series of informative studies in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), Neumann et al2 report a reduction in muscle sympathetic nerve activity by decreasing the activity of the renin–angiotensin–system with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers, suggesting either a cause and effect relationship between the 2 or, alternatively, a common origin, such as kidney ischemia.

Although experimentally it is well established that angiotensin II facilitates norepinephrine release, its role in sympathetic activation in humans is less well documented. In another model of high sympathetic tone, namely, essential hypertension, we have used 2 different approaches to address these issues. First, in a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, we prospectively evaluated whether angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers had identifiable antiadrenergic properties, as assessed by changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity and whole body norepinephrine spillover.3 Despite comparable muscle sympathetic nerve activity (35±12 bursts per minute) in hypertensive patients on placebo compared with the CKD patients studied by Neumann et al (33±11 bursts per minute),2 angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers had no effect on either of the 2 parameters measured, indicating that the angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers did not materially inhibit central sympathetic outflow or act presynaptically to reduce norepinephrine release at existing rates of nerve firing. In a second investigation, using a more direct approach,4 we combined measurements of systemic and cardiac sympathetic activity with simultaneous determination of arterial and coronary sinus plasma concentrations of angiotensin I and II. Again, our study did not provide any support for facilitation of cardiac norepinephrine release by angiotensin II in hypertensive subjects, despite markedly elevated systemic and cardiac spillover of norepinephrine.

Taken together, these studies clearly demonstrate sympathetic activation both in essential hypertension and CKD, but perhaps with a different role for central and/or peripheral angiotensin II neuromodulation. The observation that eprosartan reduced heart rate in CKD patients,2 together with experimental data from the pithed rat model revealing that eprosartan was the most potent inhibitor of facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission,5 gives ground to the assumption that these mechanisms may indeed be relevant in humans with CKD. To unravel the underlying mechanisms, it will be necessary to study regional sympathetic activation using norepinephrine kinetics. The intriguing hypothesis that kidney ischemia may be the cause of sympathetic augmentation in CKD and perhaps other conditions known to impact on renal blood flow, such as essential hypertension and congestive heart failure, warrants further investigation.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

M.D.E. has received research grants and honoraria from Solvay and Servier. The remaining authors report no conflicts.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 
1. Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Parlongo S, Cutrupi S, Benedetto FA, Tripepi G, Bonanno G, Rapisarda F, Fatuzzo P, Seminara G, Cataliotti A, Stancanelli B, Malatino LS. Plasma norepinephrine predicts survival and incident cardiovascular events in patients with end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1354–1359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Neumann J, Ligtenberg G, Klein IH, Boer P, Oey PL, Koomans HA, Blankestijn PJ. Sympathetic hyperactivity in hypertensive chronic kidney disease patients is reduced during standard treatment. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 506–510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Krum H, Lambert E, Windebank E, Campbell DJ, Esler M. Effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade on autonomic nervous system function in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006; 290: H1706–H712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Schlaich MP, Kaye DM, Lambert E, Hastings J, Campbell DJ, Lambert G, Esler MD. Angiotensin II and norepinephrine release: interaction and effects on the heart. J Hypertens. 2005; 23: 1077–1082.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Balt JC, Mathy MJ, Pfaffendorf M, van Zwieten PA. Inhibition of facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission and angiotensin II-induced pressor effects in the pithed rat: comparison between valsartan, candesartan, eprosartan and embusartan. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 2241–2250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Neumann, G. Ligtenberg, I. H.T. Klein, P. Boer, P. L. Oey, H. A. Koomans, and P. J. Blankestijn
Response to Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Is Reduced During Standard Treatment
Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): e28 - e28.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/5/e27    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.087908v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlaich, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Esler, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlaich, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Esler, M. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation