| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2007;50:503.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (B.P.S., C.S.P.L., S.F.M., D.M.M., M.M.R.), Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minn; the Division of Cardiology (J.B.P.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; and the Physiology and Biophysics Unit (M.K., W.A.L.), University of Muenster, Germany.
Correspondence to Margaret M. Redfield, MD, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail redfield.margaret{at}mayo.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hypertension, experimental hypertension, elderly ventricular function, left diastole heart failure vasculature endothelin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coupling of ventricular and vascular function during acute changes in arterial load is also important to consider as a significant subgroup of elderly patients with HFnlEF present with pulmonary edema during a hypertensive urgency or with exertional symptoms associated with an exaggerated hypertensive response to exercise.6,7 The specific mechanisms mediating the association between transient increases in blood pressure and increases in filling pressures and symptoms in HFnlEF are not fully defined. Isolated increases in preload may lead to concomitant increases in blood pressure, LV volume, and filling pressures. However, Gandhi et al studied HFnlEF patients during and after hypertensive pulmonary edema and found that LV diastolic volume was not increased and ejection fraction (EF) was not decreased during versus after pulmonary edema.6 Further, studies in patients with exercise intolerance and hypertensive responses to exercise do not demonstrate consistent increases in LV volume or decreases in EF.8 These findings suggest transient afterload induced shifts in both the systolic (ESPVR) and diastolic (EDPVR) pressure-volume relationship (PVR). Whereas acute enhancement of systolic performance with increases in afterload is well described,9–13 acute changes in the EDPVR with increases in afterload have been variably ascribed to an effect of external forces, impairment in relaxation, or acute changes in diastolic stiffness or distensibility.5,6,14,15
The objective of this study was to gain insight into the mechanisms underlying the association between vascular and ventricular function in HFnlEF and, in particular, during transient changes in blood pressure. We hypothesized that: (1) as in systole, chronic VA coupling also occurs in diastole with shifts in the slope/position of the EDPVR with chronic increases in Ea, (2) acute changes in Ea are coupled with changes in both diastolic and systolic PVR (acute VA coupling), and (3) both acute and chronic diastolic VA coupling reflects changes in LV diastolic stiffness or distensibility rather than effects of external forces or relaxation. Thus, vascular structure and function and their relationship to ventricular function were assessed in normal young dogs (YNL) and elderly dogs with chronic hypertension (OHT). As vascular (and ventricular) properties themselves may vary with changes in blood pressure, the analysis focused on the relationship between load and vascular function and ventricular systolic and diastolic performance in each group. Finally, we sought to determine whether changes in ventricular structure and function were associated with local activation of prohypertrophic/profibrotic factors such as endothelin, transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1, or angiotensin II.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Hypertension
Old mongrel dogs (n=8, age 8 to 12 years) were made hypertensive by bilateral renal wrapping (OHT) as previously described.16 An indwelling aortic catheter connected to a subcutaneous access port was placed for weekly conscious blood pressure (BP) measurements. Dogs were followed for 8 weeks after wrapping. Young dogs (n=7, age
1 year) were used as controls (YNL) and did not undergo chronic BP measurements. The animals used in this study were provided from a Class A supplier, Twin Valley in Spring Green, Wisc.
Acute Hemodynamic Study
Dogs were anesthetized with intravenous (IV) fentanyl (0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.18 mg/kg per hour) and midazolam (0.75 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.59 mg/kg per hour), intubated, and ventilated with supplemental oxygen as previously described.17 Animals were instrumented with an ascending aortic micromanometer, volumetric flow probe and piezoelectric crystals, a LV conductance catheter, a pneumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) occluder, and a left atrial pacing wire. The conductance signal was converted to a left ventricular volume by the formula: V=(1/
)·(rho·L2)·([G-GP]) where
=slope factor, rho=specific resistivity of blood measured from a 5-mL blood sample, L=distance between electrodes, G=total conductance, and GP=parallel conductance. GP was determined via the hypertonic saline method and
was derived from the aortic flow probe stroke volume (SV). Dogs received propanolol (2 mg/kg IV) and atropine (1.0 mg IV) and were atrial paced at 10 to 20 bpm above sinus rate. Steady-state data and data during acute IVC occlusion were obtained at baseline (BL), during phenylephrine infusion to achieve LV peak systolic pressure of 150 to 175 mm Hg (PE-1) and then 200 to 250 mm Hg (PE-2), after recovery from phenylephrine (BL-2) and after acute volume expansion (VE) with dextran (500 mL over 30 minutes). The heart and aorta were harvested.
Hemodynamic Analysis
The end-systolic pressure (ESP) volume (ESV) relationship (ESPVR) was defined as ESP=Ees (ESV-V0), and the end-diastolic pressure (EDP) volume (EDV) relationship (EDPVR) as EDP=
e(ß·EDV). Ees was also normalized to myocardial volume (Ees·myocardial volume). Recognizing the covariance between Ees and V0 and constraints imposed by the nonlinearity of the ESPVR and the limited pressure range over which assessment of the ESPVR occurs in vivo, afterload enhancement of myocardial performance may manifest as increases in the slope (increased Ees) or a parallel leftward shift of the ESPVR. Thus, the ESV at an ESP of 200 mm Hg (ESV200=(200/Ees)+Vo)18 was calculated to reflect systolic capacitance, inversely related to systolic stiffness. This variable would be similarly decreased by an increase in Ees or a leftward shift of the measured ESPVR. To account for the exponential configuration of the EDPVR with covariance between
and ß where both describe the shape and position of the EDPVR, diastolic capacitance was characterized as the EDV at an EDP of 20 mm Hg (EDV20=[ln(20/
)]/ß).18 Analogous to the ESP200, the EDV20 would be similarly reduced by an increase in the slope or a parallel upward/leftward shift in the position of the EDPVR. As the
and ß used to calculate EDV20 were derived from the EDPVR defined by acute preload reduction, a decrease in the EDV20 as defined above was not confounded by potential effects of external forces. The kinetics of LV relaxation and the potential impact on LV filling pressures were characterized by determining what portion of diastole was needed for relaxation to be complete. Relaxation time was calculated as 3.5·the time constant of isovolumic relaxation (
), assuming a zero asymptote or nonzero asymptote and expressed as relaxation time/diastolic period.19,20
As the characteristics of the arterial wall vary with distending pressure and geometry, comparison of vascular properties between hypertensive and nonhypertensive cohorts will reflect not only differences in the intrinsic properties of the vessel wall but also the effects of distending pressure and vessel geometry. Accordingly, the relationship between arterial properties and pressure should be defined and comparisons between groups adjusted for differences in distending pressure.21 Thus, we assessed vascular function over a range of distending pressures produced by peripheral vasoconstriction and volume expansion in YNL and OHT. As aortic stiffness increases and total arterial compliance decreases with increasing distending pressure, the relationship between these variables and mean arterial pressure was compared between groups. To further demonstrate the impact of factors influencing the pulsatile (aortic elastic modulus and arterial compliance) components of load on total load, we examined the relationship between peripheral vasoconstriction (systemic vascular resistance, SVR) and total load (Ea) between groups. SVR was calculated as mean arterial pressure (MAP)/cardiac output and expressed as dyne·sec·cm–5. Ea was calculated as ESP/SV. Aortic stiffness was quantified by Peterson elastic modulus ((Ps-Pd)·Dd)/(Ds–Dd) expressed as ·106 dyne/cm2 where Ps and Pd are aortic systolic and diastolic pressures and Ds and Dd are aortic systolic and diastolic dimensions.22 Systemic arterial compliance (SAC) was calculated using the method of Liu et al where SAC is assessed during diastole as
AoP (from PDN to Pd) /SVR (PDN–Pd) where PDN is aortic P at the dicrotic notch and Pd is aortic pressure at end-diastole.23
Histological and Biochemical Analysis
Quantitative histomorphometry was performed on picrosirus red or LELVG stained tissue samples for calculation of collagen volume fraction (CVF), elastin density, and aortic wall thickness. LV and aortic total collagen content and collagen solubility (24-hour pepsin digestion, 1 mg/mL) were quantified using the hydroxyproline assay.24 Myocardial atrial (ANP) and brain (BNP) natriuretic peptide, angiotensin II (AII), and endothelin-1 (ET-1) were measured by radioimmunoassay and normalized per mg protein as previously described.17 LV concentration of TGF-ß1 was measured using ELISA and by Western blots. Finally, stored LV tissue samples were processed and loaded onto a 2% SDS-polyacrylamide gel to identify titin isoforms N2B and N2BA25 and the percent of the more compliant N2BA isoform was determined.
Statistical Analysis
Data are reported as mean±SD. A probability value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Student t test (2 sided, unpaired) was used to compare groups if the distribution of data met a test for normality (Dallal Kolmogrorov-Smirnov test). As tests for normality in the presence of small numbers of subjects cannot guarantee a normal distribution, if data met the criteria for normality but still appeared skewed, log transformation was performed before analysis of data to enhance the normality of the distribution. Multiple linear regression was performed to assess the relationship between load and ventricular or vascular properties while adjusting for potential differences between OHT and YNL dogs.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vascular Function
During hemodynamic study under anesthesia, systolic and mean aortic pressures as well as Ea were higher or tended to be higher in OHT than YNL except at the PE-2 period (Figure 1A through 1C). For any total load (Ea), SVR was lower in OHT than YNL (Figure 1D). Aortic stiffness as assessed by the elastic modulus increased with increasing distending pressure in both groups but was higher in OHT dogs at any given distending pressure (Figure 1E). Similarly, SAC decreased with increasing MAP in both groups but was lower at any distending pressure in OHT dogs (Figure 1F).
|
Aortic Structure
Aortic fibrosis as assessed by quantitative histomorphometry and hydroxyproline assay was increased in OHT, as was the amount of collagen cross-linking as reflected by more pepsin-insoluble collagen (Figures 2A and 3A through 3
D). Conversely, elastin density (Figures 2B, 3E, and 3
F) was lower in OHT, with aortic elastin fibers appearing more fractured and disrupted. Aortic systolic dimension increased with distending pressure but was greater in OHT than YNL at any given pressure (Figure 2C). Aortic wall thickness (Figure 2D) was higher in OHT than YNL.
|
|
Baseline LV Function and Hemodynamics
At BL, LV systolic pressure and heart rate were higher; LV diastolic volume was lower in OHT than YNL whereas end-diastolic LV pressure, ejection fraction, and cardiac output were similar between groups (Table). Ees tended to be higher (P=0.06) whereas ESV200 was lower in the OHT group. The mean values for the diastolic stiffness coefficient (ß) and curve fitting constant (
) were similar between groups, however both varied widely within each group with an inverse relationship between ß and
(ln
) (see below) and EDV20 was lower in OHT than YNL.
|
The difference in diastolic properties between groups at baseline is illustrated by examples of EDPVR in 2 YNL and 2 OHT dogs in Figure 4. The 3 consecutive IVC occlusions in each dog were highly reproducible. The EDPVR is clearly steeper and shifted leftward/upward in the OHT dogs in both examples; however, in Figure 4A, the ß is identical in the 2 dogs, and in Figure 4B, the ß is higher in the OHT dog, but the
is higher in the YNL dog. One cannot compare ß or
as a single measure of the EDPVR shape and position as they covary in a nonlinear fashion (Figure 4C) which needs to be log transformed (Figure 4D) to be linear. The EDV20 parameter accounts for the covariance and its nonlinear nature in a single number to accurately reflect the difference in the EDPVR in the 2 groups.
|
Relation of LV Systolic and Diastolic Function to Load
Systolic capacitance (ESV200) decreased with increasing Ea in both YNL and OHT. However, the relationship between ESV200 and load was shifted in OHT (Figure 5A) toward lower ESV200 at any given Ea. Similarly, diastolic capacitance (EDV20) decreased with increasing Ea (Figure 5B) in both OHT and YNL dogs. However, EDV20 was lower in OHT after adjusting for differences in Ea. The time required for complete LV relaxation as a fraction of diastole also varied with load (ESP) but was greater in OHT after adjusting for differences in ESP (Figure 5C). Findings were similar whether
was calculated assuming a zero or nonzero asymptote (data not shown). Findings regarding the association of systolic and diastolic stiffness with vascular stiffness and group were similar when lower "common pressures" were used to calculate systolic and diastolic capacitance (ie, ESV150 or ESV100 and EDV10; data not shown). Further, ESV200 and EDV20 overlapped well with measured steady-state ESV and EDV when steady-state systolic and diastolic pressures were elevated with phenylephrine (data not shown).
|
Acute changes in the ESPVR and EDPVR with changes in load in an OHT dog are shown in Figure 6. The average within dog variance (SD of the 3 measurements/average of the 3 measurements, expressed as a percent) for the 3 IVC occlusions performed at each period was 4.1% for EDV20 and 7.0% for ESV200.
|
LV Structure
LV weight tended to be (P=0.056) and LV, ANP, and BNP tissue concentrations (reliable biochemical markers of hypertrophy) were higher in OHT dogs (Table). LV collagen content measured by both methods was higher in OHT, and there was more collagen cross-linking in OHT dogs. OHT dogs had higher tissue levels of ET-1 but similar angiotensin II and TGF-ß1 levels. There was no evidence of alterations in titin isoforms in the OHT (% of more compliant N2BA isoform=41.6±4.9%) as compared with YNL (%N2BA= 40.9±8.6%; P=0.7). However, as aging itself may cause shifts in titin isoforms, we also analyzed titin isoforms in stored tissue obtained from a separate group of old but nonhypertensive dogs previously studied.16 The % of the more compliant N2BA isoform was significantly less in the OHT dogs when compared with that observed in age matched nonhypertensive dogs (46.2±4.2%, P=0.02), suggesting the potential for the hypertension to have reduced the expression of the more compliant titin isoform in the elderly dogs.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Age- and Hypertension-Related Vascular Stiffening
As previously reviewed, increases in arterial stiffness with age and hypertension have been reported in multiple studies using a variety of indices reflective of arterial stiffness and its sequela—namely, increases in the speed and magnitude of reflected waves which amplify late systolic pressure and, thus, load on the LV.2,21 Here we observed striking vascular structural and functional changes and demonstrate that the abnormalities observed in OHT are independent of distending pressure.
The clinical implications of these findings are that regardless of the level of systemic vasoconstriction, Ea will be greater in elderly hypertensives because of the increased arterial stiffness and decreased arterial compliance. Decreases in aortic distensibility have been reported to correlate with exercise intolerance in HFnlEF.26 The current findings underscore the interaction between increases in vascular stiffness and changes in resistance vessel tone, which may be mediated by abnormalities of endothelial function, baroreflex control, or humoral factors and predispose to greater increases in LV load. Of note, systemic vasodilatation with exercise has been reported to be impaired in some but not all studies of HFnlEF.27,28
Chronic Ventricular Arterial Coupling
Chronic increases in Ea were coupled to chronic increases in LV systolic stiffness. However, chronic coupling of vascular and LV diastolic as well as systolic stiffness in humans is well described,29,30 and similar to our previous series,16 at baseline, the diastolic stiffness constant was not increased in the OHT dogs. We had speculated that the lack of increase in ß could be attributable to covariance between the stiffness constant ß and the curve fitting constant
which can limit the ability to characterize the EDPVR shape and position with a single parameter. In this series, controlling for this covariance by calculating diastolic capacitance revealed differences in the EDPVR between groups. Although increases in diastolic stiffness will often be evident from increases in ß, this is not always the case, and the importance of using proper methods to compare the EDPVR between groups has been recently and comprehensively reviewed18 and is further illustrated here in Figure 4.
Acute Ventricular Arterial Coupling
The potential for enhanced contractility to result in shifts in the position or slope of the ESPVR as measured in vivo has been previously reviewed.18 Indeed, previous studies in anesthetized and conscious normal dogs have demonstrated that the slope of the ESPVR is increased or the ESPVR is shifted leftward with acute increases in Ea such that SW is maximized in the absence of increases in EDV.9–13 The effect of increases in the slope or shifts in the position is captured by calculation of systolic capacitance (ESV200). The capacity for afterload enhancement of myocardial performance is lost in animal models of systolic dysfunction31 but preserved in this model which combines features of aging and chronic pressure overload.16 Previous studies suggest that these shifts are independent of the mode (vasoconstrictor infusion or aortic occlusion) used to increase Ea, autonomic blockade, or the presence of anesthesia.9–13
Whereas the effect of afterload on systolic performance has been studied, there are very few studies regarding the effect of afterload on the EDPVR. An elegant study in humans with variable types of cardiovascular disease using single beat assessment of holo-diastolic PVR reported that increases in afterload (angiotensin infusion) shifted the entire holo-diastolic PVR upward.14 Whereas the investigators speculated that this was mediated by the right ventricle or pericardium (external forces), we show that the entire EDPVR described with acute preload reduction to release external forces was shifted upward with increases in Ea. As time for complete relaxation rarely extended past 80% of diastole, this effect cannot be explained by prolonged relaxation affecting end-diastolic pressures defined during preload reduction. However, load-mediated impairment in relaxation could impinge on diastolic PVR if associated with tachycardia.20 Of note, in the study of Ghandi et al, heart rates were actually lower during rather than after hypertensive pulmonary edema and averaged <80 bpm at both time points.6 The association between load and systolic and diastolic capacitances was evident in both YNL and OHT dogs, suggesting that this is a fundamental feature of LV function not restricted to disease states. The current findings are also consistent with a recent study describing diastolic VA coupling based on analysis of pressure phase plane-derived indices in humans.32
Mechanisms of Load Dependency
This study cannot definitively elucidate the mechanisms responsible for chronic or acute systolic and diastolic VA coupling. The geometric changes, hypertrophy, extracellular matrix changes, and myocardial activation of ET,33 may contribute to chronic increases in systolic and diastolic stiffness. Interestingly, we did not detect differences in LV TGF-ß1 or angiotensin II despite the presence of increased LV fibrosis in OHT dogs. Whereas these humoral factors are important mediators of myocardial collagen synthesis, their activation may be transient.34,35 Although differences in titin isoform distribution between YNL and OHT dogs were not evident, location of myocardial sampling for the titin assays was not standardized; this may interfere with the ability to demonstrate differences. Decreases in the relative abundance of the more compliant N2BA titin isoform have been demonstrated in humans with HFnlEF.36 Additionally, variable and species-specific changes in titin isoform composition have been described in the fetal to adult transition, but changes with aging have not been explored.37 Thus, the very preliminary differences observed in the age-matched nonhypertensive dogs are of note but must be confirmed in future studies with more appropriate control of sampling location.
The mechanisms responsible for acute coupling of load and myocardial systolic performance have been previously reviewed.18 Bronzwaer and Paulus have made a cogent argument for residual diastolic myofilamentary interaction in mediating decreases in distensibility with acute increases in afterload in hypertrophied myocardium that is relevant to the current observations.15 Certainly, the concept of "passive" diastolic stiffness is increasingly irrelevant as dynamic changes in energetics and other factors affecting phosphorylation status of titin and regulatory proteins modifying calcium handling or sensitivity may alter myocardial diastolic stiffness or distensibility acutely.15,38 Similarly, it appears that dynamic changes in systolic and diastolic properties in addition to chronic resting diastolic dysfunction may mediate hemodynamics and symptoms in some patients with HFnlEF.5,27,39
Limitations
Studies were performed under anesthesia and autonomic blockade, and restoration of blood pressure to conscious levels with vasopressor infusion may not recapitulate all features observed in the conscious state. Future studies that investigate hemodynamics in a conscious animal model of hypertensive heart disease would be helpful to confirm this data. We did not measure right ventricular volume and pressure but used preload reduction to avoid effects of ventricular interdependence and pericardial constraint. As infusion of dextran could affect parallel conductance, we did recalibrate completely before measurements after volume expansion. No animal model can faithfully recapitulate all the features known or postulated to be important to the pathophysiology of HFnlEF including the potential evolution of ventricular or vascular changes over a longer duration of hypertension.40
Perspectives
In this elderly hypertensive canine model, chronic changes in vascular and ventricular stiffness predispose to, and interact with, fluctuations in blood pressure producing load-dependent decreases in systolic and diastolic LV capacitance and impairment in relaxation kinetics. These findings have relevance to the pathogenesis of HFnlEF in elderly patients with hypertensive heart disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-63281) and the German Research Foundation (Li690/7-1).
Disclosures
None.
Received February 27, 2007; first decision March 18, 2007; accepted June 8, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. P. Shapiro, T. E. Owan, S. Mohammed, M. Kruger, W. A. Linke, J. C. Burnett Jr, and M. M. Redfield Mineralocorticoid Signaling in Transition to Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Jaber, C. S. P. Lam, D. M. Meyer, and M. M. Redfield Revisiting methods for assessing and comparing left ventricular diastolic stiffness: impact of relaxation, external forces, hypertrophy, and comparators Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2738 - H2746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |