| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2007;50:525.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (A-M.H., L.E.R., P.B.L.H., S.S.N., O.S., B.L.J.), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Pharmacology (R.M.N.), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Pharmacology (P.V.), University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; and the Department of Pharmacology (S.N.), Kyoto University Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Correspondence to Boye L. Jensen, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Winslowparken 21, 3, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark. E-mail: bljensen{at}health.sdu.dk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: cyclooxygenase cGMP hypertension phosphorylation thromboxane
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4 distinct subtypes, EP1 to EP4. Of those, the EP2 and EP4 receptors are functionally associated with vasodilatation.1 EP2 receptors are less abundant than EP4 in most tissues but are involved in the systemic vasodepressor response to PGE2 infusion, and targeted deletion of EP2 results in salt-sensitive hypertension.2,3 PGE2 signaling through the EP4 receptor contributes to the systemic vasodepressor response to PGE2 in mice,4,5 attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury in the heart,6 and maintains the patency of the ductus arteriosus in fetal life.7 Experiments with inhibitors of NO synthase have provided data to suggest that NO is an extracellullar mediator for PGE2-mediated vasodilatation in various vascular beds.8,9 Local infusion of cyclooxygenase inhibitors or NO synthase inhibitors in the renal medulla precipitates hypertension, which would be compatible with a serial coupling between the pathways also at this site.10,11 However, it is not known whether there exists a direct interplay between PGE2 and NO formation in the vasculature, as shown previously to be the case for PGD2.12 PGE2 EP2 and EP4 receptors are coupled to adenylyl cyclase.1 The EP4 receptor also activates a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and protein kinase B/Akt.13 Both the cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase B/Akt pathways may augment endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) activity at the posttranslational level. Thus, reciprocal phosphorylation at eNOS-Ser1177 and dephosphorylation at eNOS-Thr495 (human sequences) control enzyme activity.14–16 Whether the phosphorylation state of eNOS in the vasculature is altered by PGE2 is unknown. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that vasodilatation mediated by PGE2 is caused by EP4 receptor-mediated phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of eNOS with subsequent increased production of NO. The experiments were performed on rings of isolated aortae from wild-type mice and mice with targeted disruption of eNOS and EP receptors. In addition, PGE2 was infused to conscious unstressed wild-type mice and eNOS–/– mice with chronic indwelling catheters to study, at the systemic level, the dependency of PGE2-mediated blood pressure changes on eNOS. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3-mm long) per experiment were suspended in a Halpern-Mulvany myograph (model 610 mol/L, Danish Myo Technology A/S) using 200-µm pins for recording of isometric force (PowerLab, ADI Instruments). Rings incubated at 37°C in physiological salt solution equilibrated with 5% CO2 in air at a pH of 7.4. The rings were normalized at resting tension of
23 mN and allowed to equilibrate for 15 minutes. Please see the data supplement for details, drugs, and reagents.
Measurements of eNOS Phosphorylation and cGMP Content
Aortic rings were mounted as described and contracted with phenylephrine (3x10–7 mol/L). PGE2 (10–7 mol/L) or vehicle was added, and preparations that relaxed >50% to PGE2 and their controls were frozen rapidly in liquid nitrogen. Five rings were pooled per condition. The tissue was homogenized and divided in 2 fractions, 1 for cyclic nucleotide measurement (enzyme immunoassay kits 5810213 and 581001, Cayman Chemical) and 1 for Western blotting (anti-phospho-eNOS-Thr495 1:2000, Upstate; anti-phospho-Ser1177 1:200, Cell Signaling; and anti-
actin 1:1000, Abcam). Please see the data supplement for details on Western blotting and PCR.
Blood Pressure Measurement
Catheters were placed in the femoral artery and vein for measurement of arterial blood pressure and intravenous infusions, respectively. The catheters were produced as described by Mattson.17 Mice recovered for 4 days before the experiments were performed. On the day of the experiment, the artery line was connected to a pressure transducer (Föhr Medical Instruments GMBH) connected to an amplifier. The measured arterial blood pressure was converted into a digital signal by an analog to digital converter (National Instruments, USB 6008) and read by a computer using Laboratory View (National Instruments) software. Data were collected at 200 Hz. Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were determined. For detailed protocols, please see the data supplement.
Data Analysis and Statistics
Constriction was expressed either relative to the maximal constriction of the respective substance set to be 100% or relative to phenylephrine-induced constriction. Relaxation was expressed as percentage of phenylephrine-induced tone. Data are shown as mean±SEM. For comparison of single and group mean values, 1-way and 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis multiple comparison test were performed, respectively, using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Prism). One sample t test was used for comparing a single mean with a hypothetical value. Values of P<0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10–5 mol/L; Figure 1A). At 10–7 mol/L, PGE2 caused a relaxation of 45.5±6.3% (n=6), and this concentration was used in subsequent experiments to identify the receptor(s) and cellular transduction pathway involved. Maximal relaxation (69±7.5%) was observed at 10–6 mol/L of PGE2.
|
When PGE2 was added cumulatively with no washing steps between each concentration (10–11 to 10–5 mol/L, 10 minutes at each concentration), PGE2 had no dilatory effect but elicited contraction at high concentrations (in quiescent rings: pEC50 4.89±0.06, n=5; and in preconstricted rings: pEC50 5.89±0.06, n=4; data not shown). As observed previously,18 PGE2-induced contraction was inhibited by thromboxane receptor antagonists (S18886; –log IC50=7.91±0.10, n=5; and SQ29548: –log IC50=7.47±0.02, n=4; data not shown). PGE2-induced contractions were absent in rings from mice with targeted disruption of the thromboxane receptor, although they contracted to phenylephrine (data not shown; n=5). In subsequent experiments, a TP antagonist (S18886) was present (10–7 mol/L), and only bolus applications of prostanoids and analogs were given.
Removal of the endothelium abolished relaxations to acetylcholine (10–6 mol/L, data not shown) and to PGE2 (Figure 1B). Subsequent exposure to the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (10–6 mol/L) relaxed the same rings to the level of basal tone (data not shown; n=6). Incubation of endothelium-intact rings with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 10–4 mol/L, 30 minutes) eliminated PGE2-induced relaxations (Figure 1B; n=11). In rings prepared from eNOS–/– mice, acetylcholine (data not shown) and PGE2 did not alter vascular tone (Figure 1B; n=6). The same rings displayed complete relaxation after application of SNP (10–6 mol/L; data not shown). Inhibition of soluble guanylate cyclase with 1H1,2,4-oxadiazolo-[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (10–6 mol/L) prevented PGE2-mediated relaxation in a reversible fashion (Figure 1B; n=6). In PGE2-dilated rings (48±3%; n=40), the cGMP content increased significantly compared with control rings (Figure 1C; n=5).
EP Receptors Involved in the Relaxation to PGE2
An EP4 receptor-selective antagonist (AE3–208 10–8 mol/L; 15 minutes) abolished the relaxation to PGE2 (Figure 2A; n=8). In rings from EP4–/– mice, the relaxation to PGE2 was attenuated significantly but not abolished (Figure 2A; n=4). The EP4 receptor-specific agonist AE1–329 (10–7 mol/L) produced significant relaxation in rings from wild-type mice (Figure 2A, right; n=11) but had no effect on vascular tone in rings from eNOS–/– mice (n=4) and in rings from wild-type mice treated with L-NAME (10–4 mol/L; 30 minutes; n=8; Figure 2A, right). In rings prepared from EP2 receptor-deficient mice (EP2–/–), PGE2 (10–7 mol/L) caused relaxations that were indistinguishable from those observed in rings from wild-type mice (Figure 2B; n=4). The EP2 receptor-specific agonist butaprost (10–6 mol/L) marginally affected tone in preconstricted rings (Figure 2B; 4.8±1.4% relaxation; n=7). PCR analysis of RNA from whole aorta showed significant expression of predominantly EP4 receptors (Figure 2C).
|
Signaling Pathways for PGE2-Induced Activation of eNOS
The cAMP-dependent protein kinase A inhibitors Rp-8-Br-cAMPs (10–4 mol/L; 45 minutes) and KT5720 (10–6 mol/L; 45 minutes; n=7) significantly attenuated the PGE2-induced relaxation (Figure 3A; n=6). The adenylate cyclase inhibitor SQ22536 (10–4 mol/L; 45 minutes; n=6) yielded similar results (Figure 3A). Relaxation to acetylcholine was not affected significantly by blockers of the cAMP-PKA pathway (data not shown). In PGE2-relaxed rings (50.3±3%; n=25), cAMP was not significantly elevated compared with control (38.5±7 pmol/mg versus 30.1±9 pmol/mg; n=5; P>0.1). Inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (LY294002: 10–5 mol/L, n=4; and wortmannin: 10–7 and 10–6 mol/L, n=4 each; data not shown) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (PD98059; 2x10–5 mol/L; 30 minutes; n=3) did not affect the PGE2-induced relaxation significantly (Figure 3B). Incubation of rings with an inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1C, calyculin A,19 (10–8 mol/L; 30 minutes) had no effect on relaxations to acetylcholine (data not shown) but abolished those to PGE2 (Figure 3B; n=11). In phenylephrine-contracted mouse aortic rings, Ser1177 phospho-eNOS was hardly detectable by Western blotting (data not shown), whereas Thr495-phospho-eNOS was readily detectable (Figure 3C). Exposure of preconstricted aortae rings to PGE2 caused significant dephosphorylation at Thr495 (Figure 3C; n=5), whereas Ser1177 phospho-eNOS did not change significantly (data not shown).
|
Arterial Blood Pressure Response to PGE2 in Wild-Type and eNOS–/– Mice
In wild-type mice, the resting mean systolic blood pressure was 101±3.9 mm Hg, and HR was 640±23 bpm (n=9). In eNOS–/– mice, arterial pressure was elevated significantly (137±3.6 mm Hg; n=13; Figure 4A and 1
B) and HR was not different from control (625±23 bpm). Injection of a saline bolus had no effect on arterial blood pressure or HR in either wild-type or eNOS–/– (Figure 4B). Two consecutive applications of PGE2 (bolus of 50 µg/kg; 1-hour interval) led to a similar decrease in arterial blood pressure during first and second application in wild-type mice (pressure after PGE2 in mm Hg; 56±2.5 and 57±0.9; n=4; first and second application, respectively) and in eNOS–/– mice (100±9.5 and 99±4.6; n=6; Figure 4B). The maximal response occurred within the first minutes after the bolus injection. Dose-response experiments showed that PGE2 had no significant effect in either strain at 10 µg/kg (data not shown). At 25 µg/kg, PGE2 caused a significant decrease in arterial blood pressure in wild-type mice only (Figure 4C; from 100±7.0 to 83±6.7 mm Hg; n=5). There was no difference in HR in response to 25 µg/kg of PGE2 in wild-type compared with eNOS–/– mice (11.5±3.4% versus 6.9±2.2% increase; P=0.29). A bolus of 50 µg/kg of PGE2 decreased blood pressure significantly in both wild-type and eNOS–/– mice (Figure 4C). The relative blood pressure decrease to 25 µg/kg and 50 µg/kg of PGE2 was significantly larger in wild-type mice compared with eNOS–/– mice (Figure 4C). There was no significant difference in the blood pressure response to nifedipine, which lowered arterial blood pressure by 37±4% and 46±6% in eNOS–/– and wild-type mice (Figure 4C). There was no significant difference in the time to recovery of blood pressure: in wild-type mice, 3.2±1.0 minutes and eNOS–/– mice, 3.4±1.3 minutes.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Removal of the endothelium, L-NAME treatment, or deletion of eNOS abolished the ability of PGE2 to cause relaxation, so we infer that smooth-muscle EP4 or EP2 receptors are of minor significance for relaxation after PGE2 in the mouse aorta. The initial sequence of events must depend on EP4 receptor-mediated activation of eNOS, followed by NO-mediated stimulation of soluble guanylate cyclase with accumulation of cGMP in the smooth muscle (Figure 5). The data indicate that PGE2 activates eNOS through formation of cAMP by the endothelium; vasorelaxation was inhibited by 3 separate blockers of PKA and adenylate cyclase; calcium-coupled PGE2 EP1 receptors were not detected in the aorta, and the response depended on phosphoprotein phosphatase 1C (PP1C), which is activated predominantly by the cAMP pathway19 (Figure 5). cAMP did not increase significantly in PGE2-relaxed vascular rings. This finding does not exclude that PGE2 induces formation of cAMP restricted to the limited pool of endothelial cells in the preparation. The notion of cAMP-PKA–dependent activation of eNOS by PP1C-mediated dephosphorylation at Thr495 is consistent with data obtained in cultured endothelial cells.14,19 PGE2 phosphorylates eNOS at Ser1177 in cultured human endothelial cells at passage 3 to 6.22 This discrepancy with the present study is likely because of the very different experimental conditions. It may also reflect that NO-mediated responses display segmental heterogeneity; they predominate in conduit vessels like the aorta, and eNOS is also more strongly expressed in this segment compared with smaller vessels.23,24
The in vivo experiments demonstrated a fall in arterial blood pressure in response to PGE2, both in eNOS–/– and wild-type mice. The response to PGE2 was less pronounced in mice with targeted disruption of eNOS than in wild-type animals. This differential sensitivity is compatible with a significant contribution of eNOS to the systemic vasodilator response to PGE2. However, the effect of PGE2 on blood pressure also involves mechanisms clearly not dependent on eNOS. Both peripheral vascular and central nervous mechanisms may be involved.25 In the mouse, EP2 and EP4 receptors contribute to the acute depressor effect of PGE2 on arterial blood pressure.4,5 Thus, EP2 receptors could be responsible for the residual systemic vasodepressor action of PGE2 in eNOS–/– mice, and EP4 receptors associated with vascular smooth muscle in the arteriolar segments could also participate.
Vasoconstriction because of cross-activation of thromboxane receptors by prostanoids and isoprostanes has been observed in various preparations.18,26 No significant expression of EP receptors associated with constriction (EP1 and EP3) was observed in mouse aorta in the present and a previous study.27 Moreover, the dissociation constant values for PGE2 at EP1 and EP3 receptors are significantly lower than the concentrations of PGE2 required to mediate constriction in the present study.28 These observations permit the conclusion that PGE2 is a low-affinity agonist at the thromboxane receptor in the mouse aorta, as observed previously in the rat aorta.18
Perspectives
The present data provide evidence for a novel pathway between PGE2 and eNOS activity initiated by endothelial EP4 receptor occupation and mediated by PP1C-dependent dephosphorylation of eNOS. This pathway is relevant not only for physiological regulation of vascular tone and blood flow but may also contribute to other vascular processes influenced by eNOS activity, such as platelet aggregation and smooth muscle cell proliferation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
The present work was supported by grants from the Danish Research Council for Health and Disease, Danish Heart Foundation, NOVO Nordisk Foundation, AJ Andersen and Hustrus Foundation, Else Poulsens Legacy, Danish Kidney Association Research Fund, and Helen and Ejnar Bjørnows Foundation.
Disclosures
None.
Received February 14, 2007; first decision March 12, 2007; accepted June 21, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Kennedy CR, Zhang Y, Brandon S, Guan Y, Coffee K, Funk CD, Magnuson MA, Oates JA, Breyer MD, Breyer RM. Salt-sensitive hypertension and reduced fertility in mice lacking the prostaglandin EP2 receptor. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 217–220.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Tilley SL, Audoly LP, Hicks EH, Kim HS, Flannery PJ, Coffman TM, Koller BH. Reproductive failure and reduced blood pressure in mice lacking the EP2 prostaglandin E2 receptor. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 1539–1545.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Audoly LP, Tilley SL, Goulet J, Key M, Nguyen M, Stock JL, McNeish JD, Koller BH, Coffman TM. Identification of specific EP receptors responsible for the hemodynamic effects of PGE2. Am J Physiol. 1999; 277: H924–H930.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Zhang Y, Guan Y, Schneider A, Brandon S, Breyer RM, Breyer MD. Characterization of murine vasopressor and vasodepressor prostaglandin E(2) receptors. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 1129–1134.
6. Xiao CY, Yuhki K, Hara A, Fujino T, Kuriyama S, Yamada T, Takayama K, Takahata O, Karibe H, Taniguchi T, Narumiya S, Ushikubi F. Prostaglandin E2 protects the heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury via its receptor subtype EP4. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2462–2468.
7. Nguyen M, Camenisch T, Snouwaert JN, Hicks E, Coffman TM, Anderson PA, Malouf NN, Koller BH. The prostaglandin receptor EP4 triggers remodelling of the cardiovascular system at birth. Nature. 1997; 390: 78–81.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Dumont I, Hou X, Hardy P, Peri KG, Beauchamp M, Najarian T, Molotchnikoff S, Varma DR, Chemtob S. Developmental regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in cerebral vessels of newborn pig by prostaglandin E2. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999; 291: 627–633.
9. Najarian T, Marracetylcholinee AM, Dumont I, Hardy P, Beauchamp MH, Hou X, Peri K, Gobeil F Jr, Varma DR, Chemtob S. Prolonged hypercapnia-evoked cerebral hyperemia via K+ channel- and prostaglandin E2-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase induction. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 1149–1156.
10. Zewde T, Mattson DL. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 in the rat renal medulla leads to sodium-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 424–428.
11. Mattson DL, Lu S, Nakanishi K, Papanek PE, Cowley AW Jr. Effect of chronic renal medullary nitric oxide inhibition on blood pressure. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266: H1918–H1926.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Braun M, Schror K. Prostaglandin D2 relaxes bovine coronary arteries by endothelium-dependent nitric oxide-mediated cGMP formation. Circ Res. 1992; 71: 1305–1313.
13. Fujino H, Regan JW. EP4 prostanoid receptor coupling to a pertussis toxin-sensitive inhibitory G protein. Mol Pharmacol. 2006; 69: 5–10.
14. Gallis B, Corthals GL, Goodlett DR, Ueba H, Kim F, Presnell SR, Figeys D, Harrison DG, Berk BC, Aebersold R, Corson MA. Identification of flow-dependent endothelial nitric-oxide synthase phosphorylation sites by mass spectrometry and regulation of phosphorylation and nitric oxide production by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 30101–30108.
15. Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Dimmeler S, Kemp BE, Busse R. Phosphorylation of Thr495 regulates Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity. Circ Res. 2001; 88: E68–E75.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lin MI, Fulton D, Babbitt R, Fleming I, Busse R, Pritchard KA Jr, Sessa WC. Phosphorylation of threonine 495 in endothelial nitric-oxide synthase coordinates the coupling of L-arginine metabolism to efficient nitric oxide production. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 44719–44726.
17. Mattson DL. Long-term measurement of arterial blood pressure in conscious mice. Am J Physiol. 1998; 274: R564–R570.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Dorn GW 2nd, Becker MW, Davis MG. Dissociation of the contractile and hypertrophic effects of vasoconstrictor prostanoids in vascular smooth muscle. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 24897–24905.
19. Michell BJ, Chen Zp, Tiganis T, Stapleton D, Katsis F, Power DA, Sim AT, Kemp BE. Coordinated control of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase phosphorylation by protein kinase C and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 17625–17628.
20. Nishigaki N, Negishi M, Ichikawa A. Two Gs-coupled prostaglandin E receptor subtypes, EP2 and EP4, differ in desensitization and sensitivity to the mtetabolic inactivation of the agonist. Mol Pharmacol. 1996; 50: 1031–1037.[Abstract]
21. Bastepe M, Ashby B. The long cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus of the prostaglandin E2 receptor EP4 subtype is essential for agonist-induced desensitization. Mol Pharmacol. 1997; 51: 343–349.
22. Namkoong S, Lee SJ, Kim CK, Kim YM, Chung HT, Lee H, Han JA, Ha KS, Kwon YG, Kim YM. Prostaglandin E2 stimulates angiogenesis by activating the nitric oxide/cGMP pathway in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Exp Mol Med. 2005; 37: 588–600.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Davis RJ, Murdoch CE, Ali M, Purbrick S, Ravid R, Baxter GS, Tilford N, Sheldrick RL, Clark KL, Coleman RA. EP4 prostanoid receptor-mediated vasodilatation of human middle cerebral arteries. Br J Pharmacol. 2004; 141: 580–585.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Shimokawa H, Yasutake H, Fujii K, Owada MK, Nakaike R, Fukumoto Y, Takayanagi T, Nagao T, Egashira K, Fujishima M, Takeshita A. The importance of the hyperpolarizing mechanism increases as the vessel size decreases in endothelium-dependent relaxations in rat mesenteric circulation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996; 28: 703–711.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Feuerstein G, Adelberg SA, Kopin IJ, Jacobowitz DM. Hypothalamic sites for cardiovascular and sympathetic modulation by prostaglandin E2. Brain Res. 1982; 231: 335–342.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Audoly LP, Rocca B, Fabre JE, Koller BH, Thomas D, Loeb AL, Coffman TM, FitzGerald GA. Cardiovascular responses to the isoprostanes iPF2
-III and iPE2-III are mediated via the thromboxane A2 receptor in vivo. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2833–2840.
27. Fujino T, Yuhki K, Yamada T, Hara A, Takahata O, Okada Y, Xiao CY, Ma H, Karibe H, Iwashima Y, Fukuzawa J, Hasebe N, Kikuchi K, Narumiya S, Ushikubi F. Effects of the prostanoids on the proliferation or hypertrophy of cultured murine aortic smooth muscle cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2002; 136: 530–539.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Kiriyama M, Ushikubi F, Kobayashi T, Hirata M, Sugimoto Y, Narumiya S. Ligand binding specificities of the eight types and subtypes of the mouse prostanoid receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1997; 122: 217–224.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Dalsgaard, C. Kroigaard, T. Bek, and U. Simonsen Role of Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels with Small Conductance in Bradykinin-Induced Vasodilation of Porcine Retinal Arterioles Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2009; 50(8): 3819 - 3825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Di Francesco, L. Totani, M. Dovizio, A. Piccoli, A. Di Francesco, T. Salvatore, A. Pandolfi, V. Evangelista, R. A. Dercho, F. Seta, et al. Induction of Prostacyclin by Steady Laminar Shear Stress Suppresses Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Biosynthesis via Heme Oxygenase-1 in Human Endothelial Cells Circ. Res., February 27, 2009; 104(4): 506 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Jia, X. Guo, H. Zhang, M.-H. Wang, Z. Dong, and T. Yang Microsomal Prostaglandin Synthase-1-Derived Prostaglandin E2 Protects Against Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension via Inhibition of Oxidative Stress Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): 952 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H.C. Tang, B. L. Jensen, O. Skott, G. P.H. Leung, M. Feletou, R. Y.K. Man, and P. M. Vanhoutte The role of prostaglandin E and thromboxane-prostanoid receptors in the response to prostaglandin E2 in the aorta of Wistar Kyoto rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2008; 78(1): 130 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |