Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2007;50:e59-e60
Published online before print July 16, 2007, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.094664
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/3/e59    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.094664v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adiyaman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adiyaman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, J. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other etiology

(Hypertension. 2007;50:e59.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Dipping Deeper Into the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index

Ahmet Adiyaman

Nymegen Medical Centre, Department of General Internal Medicine, Radboud University, Nymegen, The Netherlands

José Boggia

Department of Pathophysiology, Universitá de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay

Yan Li; Ji-Guang Wang

Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Jiaotong University Medical School, Shanghai, China

Eoin O’Brien

Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College, Dublin, Ireland

Tom Richart; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A. Staessen

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

To the Editor:

Methodologic and conceptual issues seriously weaken the conclusions of Schillaci et al1 on the ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), as published in the May 2007 issue of Hypertension.

Schillaci et al1 reported that, in 515 untreated patients, AASI depended on the nocturnal blood pressure fall. We confirmed this observation in our Flemish population study.2 The correlation coefficients were similar to those in the report by Schillaci et al1: –0.24 versus –0.28 for systolic blood pressure (2-sided P value computed by Fisher’s Z transformation, 0.42), and –0.39 versus –0.46 for diastolic blood pressure (P=0.11). However, the ambulatory recording of 1 of the representative patients of Schillaci et al1 included {approx}25 nighttime and {approx}35 daytime readings. The night:day ratio of the number of blood pressure readings was therefore 0.71, whereas in our studies,2,3 it was {approx}0.30. As shown in the Figure, this ratio influences estimates of AASI. Furthermore, in our 166 Chinese volunteers,3 in whom we measured AASI and pulse wave velocity (PWV) within 24 hours, the correlation coefficients with the percentage fall in nocturnal blood pressure were similar for PWV and AASI (MTEST statement in the PROC REG procedure of the SAS package, version 9.1.3; P>0.54), amounting to –0.54 and –0.49 for systolic dipping and to –0.56 and –0.57 for diastolic dipping.


Figure 1
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Association of the AASI with the number of daytime and nighttime readings in 1127 subjects randomly recruited from a Flemish population.2

Schillaci et al1 did not seek survival of AASI in the multivariate-adjusted association with left ventricular mass index. In Table 3 of their report,1 they introduced not independent but highly intercorrelated predictors, bound to remove AASI from the model. The correlation between the daytime systolic pressure and the nocturnal fall in systolic blood pressure is close, because computation of the latter requires use of the former. Schillaci et al1 did not report the t-to-enter for AASI and the variable, probably the daytime systolic blood pressure, that excluded AASI to remain in the model. More importantly, Schillaci et al1 failed to demonstrate that, with similar adjustments applied as for AASI, the association between left ventricular mass index and PWV remained significant.

In line with our first report on AASI,3 Schillaci et al1 found significant (P<0.001) association between PWV and AASI, although the correlation coefficient was lower (0.28 versus 0.51; P=0.0039). Schillaci et al1 must be aware of Bland and Altman’s4 recommendations for assessing concordance between 2 measurements and our analyses complying with these recommendations.5 Nevertheless, the Italian investigators did not go beyond reporting a correlation coefficient as measure of agreement. Moreover, it is conceptually wrong in the assessment of concordance between measurements to adjust for common determinants underlying the measured trait. In our Chinese volunteers,3 mean arterial pressure removed the association between PWV and AASI. That accounting for common determinants weakens the correlation between PWV and AASI actually corroborates that these 2 measurements reflect arterial stiffness.

In conclusion, we confirmed that AASI is inversely correlated with the nocturnal fall in blood pressure, especially in ambulatory recordings with a disproportionately large number of nighttime readings. We concur with the idea that AASI is an indirect measure of arterial stiffness.3,5 However, we disagree with inappropriate or unnecessary adjustment in regression models,1 and we regret that the information on the correlations of left ventricular mass index with AASI and PWV was incomplete.1


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

The Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen, Ministry of the Flemish Community (Brussels, Belgium; grants G.0424.03 and G.0575.06) and the University of Leuven (OT/00/25 and OT/05/49) supported the Flemish population study. The European Union (LSHM-CT-2006-037093 InGenious HyperCare) facilitated networking between the Shanghai Jiaotong University Medical School and the University of Leuven. The Nederlandse Hartstichting (Dr E. Dekker student grant), Den Haag, The Netherlands, supported the fellowship of A.A. in Leuven.

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 
1. Schillaci G, Parati G, Pirro M, Pucci G, Mannarino MR, Sperandini L, Mannarino E. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index is not a specific marker of reduced arterial compliance. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 986–991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Staessen JA, Bieniaszewski L, O’Brien ET, Imai Y, Fagard R. An epidemiological approach to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: the Belgian population study. Blood Press Monit. 1996; 1: 13–26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Li Y, Wang JG, Dolan E, Gao PJ, Guo HF, Nawrot T, Stanton AV, Zhu DL, O’Brien E, Staessen JA. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index derived from 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 2006; 47: 359–364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 2: 307–310.

5. Li Y, Dolan E, Wang JG, Thijs L, Staessen JA, O’Brien E, Stanton A. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index: determinants and outcome. Blood Press Monit. 2006; 11: 107–110.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Adiyaman, D. G. Dechering, J. Boggia, Y. Li, T. W. Hansen, M. Kikuya, K. Bjorklund-Bodegard, T. Richart, L. Thijs, C. Torp-Pedersen, et al.
Determinants of the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index in 7604 Subjects From 6 Populations
Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): 1038 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Schillaci, G. Parati, M. Pirro, G. Pucci, M. R. Mannarino, L. Sperandini, and E. Mannarino
Response to Dipping Deeper Into the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index
Hypertension, September 1, 2007; 50(3): e61 - e62.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/3/e59    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.094664v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adiyaman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adiyaman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, J. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other etiology