Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2007;50:829-834
Published online before print October 8, 2007, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.096750
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/5/829    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.096750v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kem, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kem, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, M. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Type 1 diabetes
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other etiology
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

(Hypertension. 2007;50:829.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hypertension Case Report

Autoimmune Hypertensive Syndrome

David C. Kem; Xichun Yu; Eugene Patterson; Shijun Huang; Stavros Stavrakis; Bela Szabo; Leann Olansky; Jon McCauley; Madeleine W. Cunningham

From the Departments of Medicine (D.C.K., X.Y., E.P., S.H., S.S., B.S., L.O.), Cell Biology (E.P.), Microbiology and Immunology (M.W.C.), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and VA Medical Center, Oklahoma City; and McAlester Clinic (J.M.), McAlester, Okla. Current address (L.O.): The Cleveland Clinic, Ohio.

Correspondence to David C. Kem, WP-1345, 920 Stanton Young Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. E-mail david-kem{at}ouhsc.edu


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Intravenous infusion of epinephrine or norepinephrine produces hypertension and symptoms similar to a pheochromocytoma.1,2 The sequelae are predictable on the basis of continuous infusion of agonists that activate ß and {alpha} adrenergic receptors (ARs). These monoamine agonists, however, are not the only means by which ß-ARs can be activated. Activating autoantibodies (AAs) directed toward the ß1AR and/or the ß2AR have been demonstrated in some patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy,3–5 Chagas’ disease,6,7 and other forms of cardiomyopathy.8,9 Several studies have demonstrated that these antibodies possess the ability to activate the intrinsic ßAR signal transduction system; however, these studies have focused only on the possible relationship of the AAßAR agonist effects on cardiomyopathy. Because ß-agonist excess also produces changes in systemic blood pressure, one would expect the presence of AAßAR to produce a phenotype including some features observed in patients with an epinephrine-only secretory neuroendocrine tumor. Isolated studies have reported the concurrence of activating autoantibodies to the {alpha}1AR10,11 or to the angiotensin receptor (AT1)12,13 in a few patients with associated hypertension.

Herein, we present a hypertensive patient with no clinical evidence for a pheochromocytoma secreting excess catecholamine(s). However, in year 2000, there was conclusive evidence for anti-ßAR autoantibodies, which in vitro activate the ßAR signal transduction system independent of the intrinsic hormone-mediated system. Subsequent study in sera obtained in 2006 confirmed these data. These autoantibodies, as a result of their peptide sequence specificity, do not activate the {alpha}-adrenergic transduction system, as would norepinephrine or epinephrine at higher dosages. The evidence that these antibodies possess all of the ß-activation potential of epinephrine is not unlike that expected with an epinephrine-only secreting pheochromocytoma but without a secretory tumor. The patient may represent the prototype of a new hypertensive syndrome that has an autoimmune basis.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Presentation
Patient K113, aged 40, presented in year 2000 with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus requiring 30 to 50 IU of insulin per day. She was noted to have mild hypertension without blanching or flushing episodes, but she had postural hypotension. She was first diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus at age 21 years and her diabetes had been poorly controlled on variable insulin regimens. Her heart catheterization demonstrated a globally dilated left ventricle with an ejection fraction of 30%. Diastolic dysfunction was observed with an end-diastolic pressure of 20 mm Hg. Coronary pathoanatomy showed minimal luminal irregularities with 1 plaque at {approx}40%, but no others were observed. The diagnosis she was assigned was "diabetic" cardiomyopathy complicated with hypertension. She was referred to the University of Oklahoma Endocrinology Section for consideration of an insulin pump. Initial studies revealed a hemoglobin A1c of 10.6, a blood pressure of 147/92 mm Hg while on 2 antihypertensive medications, and a 24-hour urinary protein >800 mg/d. Initial studies and sera were drawn, and a return visit was planned. In the interval, 1 month later, she suffered a myocardial infarction and had the documented onset of ventricular tachycardia leading to ventricular fibrillation and the sudden cardiac death syndrome. She was successfully resuscitated but suffered significant hypotension and resultant acute renal failure superimposed on her diabetic nephropathy.

She was subsequently placed on an insulin pump and achieved reasonable control of fasting and postprandial blood sugar excursions. Her total insulin requirements on this overall regimen dropped to 25 to 30 U/d, and occasional hypoglycemia was observed if she altered her meal timing. Her cardiac function was monitored by echocardiography, which provided evidence for a cardiomyopathy with a small region of the left posterior ventricle demonstrating impaired contractile function. Her estimated left ventricular ejection fraction was 28% in 2000. She was started on chronic renal hemodialysis but never recovered sufficient renal function to discontinue end-stage renal disease hemodialysis. Her physician placed her on the ß-blocker carvedilol, clonidine, a calcium channel blocker, and a loop diuretic, and hemodialysis was initiated. She gradually improved, and her cardiac function gradually improved with an ejection fraction estimated at 35% 1 year later. Her medications varied over the next 5 years but always incorporated the ß-blocker carvedilol and a low dosage of the converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril. Her elevated blood pressure was reduced and remained in the 110/60- to 70-mm Hg range with a marked reduction of medications. An increase in postural hypotension with basal mildly elevated pulse was attributed to autonomic neuropathy. A sensorineural deficiency was also noted. Later, markedly elevated AAßAR titers were detected in her original sera. She was brought back for follow-up studies under an established protocol approved by the institutional review board. Leukocytes also were obtained for follow-up studies and production of monoclonal antibodies.

Because these elevated values of AAßAR (Figure 1) could cause a state of continual ß-agonist activation, a limited evaluation to confirm the absence of a concomitant pheochromocytoma was performed. Urinary studies were unreliable because of the patient’s marked anuria with concomitant hemodialysis. While at rest, a plasma epinephrine obtained from a cannula 30 minutes after insertion was 59 pg/mL (<84 pg/mL). The concomitant plasma norepinephrine was 171 pg/mL (<420 pg/mL). Analysis for serum chromogranin A was not possible because of concurrent renal failure. A computed tomography of the abdomen demonstrated normal adrenal glands. Her cardiac status was reevaluated by echocardiography demonstrating an ejection fraction >50%.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The ELISA titers for both anti-ß1AR and anti-ß2AR from 2000 and 2006 are shown in this plot compared with values obtained in 25 normal control subjects.

Control Subjects
Twenty-five subjects were obtained who were age 18 to 80 years, male and female, all without evidence for preexisting hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or any cardiac illness. This study was approved by the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Institutional Review Board. All of the subjects provided written informed consent.

ELISA
The ELISA was performed as described.14 Briefly, Immulon 4 (Dynatech Laboratories) microtiter plates were coated according to standard procedures at 4°C overnight with purified human cardiac myosin,15 human ß1AR, or ß2AR expressed in Sf9 membranes (PerkinElmer) at 10 µg/mL in 0.1 mol/L of carbonate-bicarbonate coating buffer (pH 9.6). Plates were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 hour at 37°C, and washed with PBS/Tween 20. To determine antibody titer, sera were diluted 1:100 in 1% BSA in PBS and thereafter diluted 2-fold. Sera were added to microtiter wells and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were then washed with PBS/Tween 20, and 50 µL of goat anti-human IgG secondary antibody (Sigma) conjugated with alkaline phosphatase at a 1:500 dilution was added and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. Plates were finally washed with PBS/Tween 20, and 50 µL of substrate para-nitrophenyl-phosphate 104 (Sigma) in 0.1 mol/L of diethanolamine buffer (pH 9.8) was added. Optical density was measured at 405 nm in an ELISA plate reader (Dynex). Tests were in triplicate, and in each assay the titration was performed in duplicate. Titers were determined as the highest dilution with an optical density value of 0.10 at {approx}60 minutes as compared with positive and negative standard sera. Controls included serum alone, secondary antibody conjugate alone, and 1% BSA alone. Reproducibility within each assay was monitored between duplicate and triplicate assays and demonstrated almost no variation in optical density (±0.1) from day-to-day assays.

Hybridoma Production
Peripheral blood was obtained from the patient. Mononuclear cells were separated from whole blood by Histopaque-1077 Hybri-Max (Sigma) and stimulated for 1 week with 10 µg/mL of streptococcal peptidoglycan-polysaccharide (Fisher Scientific) in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium containing 10% human AB serum. The cells were stimulated with pokeweed mitogen (1 µg/mL) in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium containing 10% human AB serum for an additional week. Cells were washed 3 times in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium without serum and fused with HMMA2.11TG/0 cells (human/mouse myeloma cell line, Dr Marshall Posner, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) using polyethylene glycol-1000, as described previously.16 Hybridomas were selected by culture in hypoxanthine aminopterin thymidine medium and screened using GlcNAc conjugated to BSA as described.17 Cloning of hybridomas was achieved by limiting dilution and was performed 3 times. Established clones were maintained in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium containing 20% FBS.

Contractility Bioassays
Five- to 7-mm segments of free-running Purkinje strands from canine hearts were transferred to a 36±0.1°C perfusion chamber mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope (Olympus). The contraction was recorded using a video edge detector (Model VED-205, Crescent Electronics) at x25 optical magnification, sampled at 120 Hz and recorded digitally. Fibers were stimulated with supermaximal constant current pulses of 4 ms at 1.0 Hz via extracellular platinum electrodes. The extracellular buffer solution (in mmol/L: NaCl 145, KCl 4.5, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 1, Na2HPO4 1, glucose 11, and HEPES/NaOH 15; pH 7.36) at 36°C was used.

After achieving stable contractile responses, IgG from the patient, equivalent to a 1:100 serum dilution, was fed into the perfusion chamber at a rate of 5 mL/min. Contractions were continuously recorded before, at the onset, during steady effects of the test substance, and after the washout. After the washout, a second infusion of the same concentration of IgG plus propranolol (1 µmol/L) was performed to determine the degree of ßAR activation attributable to the IgG. The ßAR agonist isoproterenol (ISO; 10 nmol/L) was used as a positive control. IgG from 2 normal subjects was used as negative controls. Contractility indices were recorded and analyzed using pClamp 9.2 (Axon Instruments) and Sigmastat statistical software. An increase in contractility was considered significant when the P value was <0.05 (n≥15 contraction cycles) using a multiple-measures ANOVA test. This technique is quite stable. The coefficient of variation at baseline (buffer only) was 4.4% and 4.6% after stimulation (values equivalent to ISO control; n=11 observations).

Automaticity Bioassays
These were performed in free-running Purkinje fiber preparations attached to a canine endocardial section in a perfusion chamber.18 This was perfused with a modified Tyrode’s solution at 36°C. Intracellular potentials were recorded from the central Purkinje strand using a glass microelectrode filled with KCl (3.0 mol/L). A bipolar electrogram was recorded from the distal free-running Purkinje strand, proximal to the endocardial insertion. Rates were determined after reaching equilibrium, generally within 1 to 2 minutes of exposure to the test substance. The average recorded rate was computed from 1-minute intervals. Rates were allowed to stabilize, and the test serum was then infused as described above. Serum infusion was followed by a 10- to 15-minute wash to allow a new baseline to be established. When the effect of a ß-blocker was tested, it was first added to the perfusate to allow the new baseline to be established. Then serum was added into the buffer/ß-blocker containing perfusate to determine whether the previously documented ß-agonist activity was altered. Three separate measurements were made for each observation period, and the values represent the mean for each period. The coefficient of variation at baseline (buffer) was 2.4% and 2.6% after stimulation over an average of 20 consecutive beats.

Protein Kinase Assays
Assays to determine protein kinase A (PKA) activity were performed as described19 using serum from the patient and/or with IgG purified from the patient’s serum using the Melon Gel IgG purification kit (Pierce Biotechnology). IgG was diluted to give a concentration in the bioassay equivalent to a 1:100 dilution of the patient’s sera. Briefly, 1x107 rat primary cardiac H9c2 cells (American Type Culture Collection) were plated in T75 culture flasks overnight. Sera (1:100 dilution) or IgG were incubated with cells in a final volume of 15 mL of medium for 1 hour before reactions were stopped by ice-cold PBS. Cells were mechanically dislodged from flasks, centrifuged, and solubilized in 0.3 mL of protein extraction buffer before homogenization. Protein kinase activity of H9c2 cells was measured using a SignaTECT PKA assay system (Promega). For inhibition of antibody-induced PKA activity, the ß-blocker propranolol (10 µmol/L) was added. The ßAR agonist ISO (10 µmol/L) was used to induce PKA activity in the H9c2 cardiac cells. Calculation of the units of PKA per microgram of protein was determined and computed in the formula used in the assay kit purchased from Promega. The specific activity of the enzyme was determined in picomoles per liter per minute per microgram for each sample, and the results were presented as percentages above the basal level of PKA activity.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
ELISA for AAßAR and Cardiac Myosin
Sera from the year 2000 demonstrated markedly elevated antibodies directed toward both ß1 and ß2 receptors as measured by ELISA (Figure 1). The ELISA titer for the AAß2AR was 2-fold higher than AAß1AR. These were 8- and 4-fold greater, respectively, than those observed in control subjects. There was a significant elevation of anticardiac myosin autoantibodies. Sera from 2006 demonstrated lower titers for each of the autoantibodies. These were just above the upper level of reference range (0 to 1600) for both ßARs. The anticardiac myosin levels were within the reference range (0 to 800).

Activity Assays
Bioactivity was measured using a Purkinje fiber contractility assay. A dose response was examined using the year 2006 sera to establish parameters for subsequent activity assays. Serum dilutions of 1:400, 1:200, 1:100, and 1:50 were used (Figure 2, top). A small but significant increase in contractility was observed over baseline at the 1:400 dilution, and an increasing response was observed throughout the remaining dilutions. The remaining sera from 2000 and 2006, therefore, were used at a standard dilution of 1:100. Affinity-purified IgG also was used at a concentration of 1:100 of the estimated circulating IgG in the patient. A similar dose response was observed using ISO in concentrations spanning the concentrations expected in vivo (Figure 2, bottom). IgG from the year 2006 serum produced a significant positive contractility response compared with IgG from 2 control subjects (Figure 3). These responses were similar to that observed with the ß-agonist ISO positive control. This inotropic effect was completely blocked by pretreatment with the nonselective ß-blocker propranolol and by nadolol. The nadolol was also tested to confirm that the ß-blockade was not altered because of any intrinsic direct membrane effect associated with propranolol. In 1 study, the system was standardized by infusion of 10 nmol/L of ISO before application of the IgG, and a positive response was still observed with the IgG. Subsequent reperfusion with ISO demonstrated only modest evidence for desensitization to the IgG, and the positive ISO response was still retained.


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Top, The dose-response effect of the 2006 serum is shown on Purkinje fiber contractility. Dilutions as low as 1:400 gave a significant increase in contractility compared with the buffer alone. Each point represents the mean±SD for 5 observations. *P=0.05, **P<0.01 vs buffer control. Bottom, ISO was used as a positive control. This preparation was able to demonstrate significance even at 10–10 mol/L concentrations. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs buffer control.


Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. The effect of IgG from the patient is shown on Purkinje fiber contractility. Data are shown for 6 different studies using IgG derived from the sera, for 2 normal control subjects and for the ISO control. Only 1 assay was used with the ß-blocker nadolol (NAD). The values represent mean±SD and are expressed as percentage above basal levels of the buffer control (dashed line). The nadolol was added to the perfusion buffer before the test, and new baseline data were acquired. There was an immediate rise in the contractility index when IgG was added. This effect would be maintained for 2 to 5 minutes and then would wash out over a 5-minute period, indicating that the antibodies were not of such high affinity as to remain affixed for prolonged periods. This response was completely blocked when a ß-blocker was added before the addition of the IgG. *P<0.01 vs control IgG.

The effect of the serum was also tested on the automaticity of the Purkinje fiber (Figure 4). A positive chronotropic response was observed that was relatively sustained over a 5-minute observation period in the presence of serum. This was quite different from that of serum from a normal control subject. Washout times were 2 to 5 minutes, requiring a longer interval than after the addition of the agonist ISO. The positive chronotropic effects of the serum were blocked by previous treatment with nadolol.


Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. The effect of the 2006 sera is shown on Purkinje fiber automaticity for the patient and a normal control subject. Each value represents the mean of 20 consecutive contractions and was measured once the preparation had stabilized. The data are expressed as the percentage above basal levels of the buffer control (dashed line; mean±SD; n=3). This effect was similar to the contractility data. There was no evidence for desensitization of the response over a 5-minute exposure period. This accelerated response again was completely eliminated by previous treatment with the non-selective ß-blocker nadolol (NAD). *P<0.01 vs control sera.

Serum from 2000 and serum and the affinity purified IgG from 2006 all activated PKA in an in vitro assay system using cultured H9c2 cardiac cells (Figure 5). PKA activation was significantly greater than that observed using control serum or IgG and comparable to that of the nonselective ß-agonist ISO control. The elevated PKA response was observed in all of the samples from this patient. In addition, the PKA activation of both the IgG and the ISO was blocked by the nonselective ß-blocker propranolol.


Figure 5
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. The effect of sera and affinity-purified IgG derived from the patient’s sera on PKA activation is shown for sera obtained in 2000 and for both sera and IgG obtained in 2006. The values are expressed as percentages above basal levels of PKA in medium control (dashed line) in the H9c2 heart cell line (mean±SD; n=3). There was no significant difference between the use of sera and affinity-purified IgG from the sera in the assay. The patient was not on a ß-blocker when the first sample was obtained. There was no apparent effect of carvedilol on PKA activity in the diluted sera in 2006. This potential effect was eliminated in the purified IgG sample. The PKA activity was returned to baseline when propranolol (PROP) was added to the incubated cells. ISO was used as a positive control to activate PKA. *P<0.01 vs sera or IgG from a normal control subject.

Human hybridomas producing anti-ßAR antibodies were derived from B-lymphocytes obtained from the patient in 2006. Selected clones confirmed the presence of AAß1AR in the absence of cross-reactivity to cardiac myosin. Monoclonal antibodies strongly reacted with ß1AR at optical densities of 0.6 to 1.0 demonstrating B cells producing anti-ß1AR specificity in the patient.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The association of AAßAR with cardiomyopathy has been observed for the past 15 years.3–8 There has been a gradual realization that these antibodies have agonist capacity to illicit the pathophysiologic effects in vivo. These AAßARs target the ßAR and activate downstream signal transduction, including PKA, when studied in vitro.19–22 AAßARs have been induced in experimental animal models, are associated with the onset of cardiomyopathy, and have been passively transferred from either a human source or from animal models to produce a cardiomyopathy.22–24 These characteristics fulfill the postulates of Witebsky et al25 for proof of an autoimmune cardiomyopathy. A most difficult corollary is to remove the antibody and thereby demonstrate improvement and/or cure of the disease. Although this has been attempted in a few poorly controlled studies,26,27 none are totally convincing, and a definitive study depends on more efficient means of suppressing or eliminating specific antibodies responsible for activation of the ßAR. Although this patient was undergoing ultrafiltration hemodialysis, there were no data to support adding an experimental procedure, such as plasmapheresis, because her clinical status had stabilized.

Despite increasing evidence that AAßAR can mimic the presence of ß-agonists, there has been little interest as to whether they are causative for hypertension. A review of several studies characterizing the presence or absence of AAßAR in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy failed to provide individual data that might allow one to correlate whether systemic BP was maintained at a higher level in those with AAßAR compared with those without. In the animal passive transference studies, the tail BP was only recorded before and at the time when the cardiomyopathy had already developed. Because the associated decreased cardiac output frequently counterbalances any increase in systemic resistance in patients with primary cardiomyopathy, this may not be a reliable sign pointing for or against the presence of AAßAR.

The patient herein described presents features compatible with an epinephrine-secreting pheochromocytoma. She had mild hypertension, diabetes mellitus (type 1 but with increased insulin resistance), lipid abnormalities, a cardiomyopathy, and susceptibility to a cardiac ventricular tachyarrhythmia associated with a subsequent myocardial infarct. These signs and symptoms were coexistent with markedly elevated titers of both AAß1AR and AAß2AR. These antibodies (IgG), at even a 1:100 or higher dilution of their expected circulating concentrations in sera, demonstrated significant agonist effects in 3 different activity assays. These include activation of PKA in heart cells in vitro, an increase in the cardiac contraction rate, and an increase in cardiac contractility. These effects were completely blocked by combined ß1 and ß2 blockade, and there was no evidence for residual {alpha} activation. This syndrome, therefore, differs slightly from that of a classic pheochromocytoma secreting only epinephrine, because the AAßARs are receptor selective, and there was no evidence for residual {alpha}1 activation. We did not have detailed hemodynamic studies other than the initial cardiac catheterization and measurements of cardiac function estimated from echocardiographic studies. Because even pheochromocytomas do not present with unique hemodynamic studies,28 we are unable to demonstrate any unique characteristics that might differentiate either type of adrenergic agonist presentation. Because the AAßARs do not change concentrations in a short frame of time and appear to not interact with the {alpha}1 receptor, one would not anticipate blanching. Although a type 2 diabetes mellitus is more characteristic of a pheochromocytoma, patients with autoimmune type 1 diabetes mellitus might be expected to develop autoimmune expression of AAßAR more frequently than the general population. This patient presented initially with increased insulin requirements before ß-blocker therapy that could represent the expected metabolic effects of AAßAR.

Although there currently are no practical means less than repetitive selective or nonselective plasmapheresis for removing these AAßARs from the patient, long-term ß-blockade was related to a marked improvement in the patient’s cardiovascular status. Although improved diabetic control after institution of an insulin pump probably contributed to this outcome, her overall glucose control still remained in a range that would be considered at risk. There was a significant attenuation of the titer of the AAßAR over a 6-year interval, and this may have been associated with her improved hemodynamic state and response to insulin.

Perspectives
Infusion of a ß-agonist into an animal or human produces sequelae involving the cardiovascular and metabolic systems. However, the discovery of autoantibodies that activate ßAR, even at serum dilutions of 1:100 or more, has not been easily accepted as contributing to the pathophysiology of hypertensive syndromes. The present study documents this probability. The pathophysiologic role of agonist-excess syndromes potentially caused by autoimmune activation expands our understanding of the range of signal transduction. Additional studies are needed to demonstrate the prevalence and significance of increased ß-agonist activity associated with AAßAR in high-risk subjects. Many subjects within the hypertensive and/or diabetic population have sequelae that overlap with the present entity. It will be important to examine the prevalence and role that such activating antibodies have in their pathogenesis.29,30 It is possible that a subgroup of these patients have significant levels of AAßAR. There is reluctance by some clinicians to use ß-blockers in patients with diabetes. However, the risks of decreased control and/or awareness of hyperglycemic episodes may not be as great as feared previously.31,32 The presence of significant titers of AAßAR with agonist effects would justify a high priority for a prospective study of ß-blocker therapy and the use of other techniques to suppress and/or eliminate the AAßAR to demonstrate whether the full manifestation of the phenotype can be prevented.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Linda Garrett and Tina Lawson provided administrative support. We also thank Kathy Alvarez, Adita Mascaro Blanco, and Janet Heuser for exceptional technical assistance.

Sources of Funding

This work has been supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL56267) and American Diabetes Associaton (to M.W.C.), the VA Medical Center (to D.C.K.), an American Heart Association Beginning-Grant-In-Aid (to X.Y.), an American Heart Association Grant-In-Aid (to E.P.), and by support from Mr and Mrs Stan Ward.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
D.C.K. and M.W.C. contributed equally to this work.

Presented in part at the Scientific Session, Annual Meeting of the American Heart Association, Chicago, Ill, November 12–15, 2006.

Received June 22, 2007; first decision July 9, 2007; accepted September 7, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Goldenberg M, Aranow H Jr, Smith AA, Faber M. Pheochromocytoma and essential hypertensive vascular disease. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1950; 86: 823–836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Allwood MJ, Cobbold AF, Ginsburg J. Peripheral vascular effects of noradrenaline, isopropylnoradrenaline and dopamine. Br Med Bull. 1963; 19: 132–136.[Free Full Text]

3. Wallukat G, Morwinski M, Kowal K, Forster A, Boewer V, Wollenberger A. Autoantibodies against the beta-adrenergic receptor in human myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy: beta-adrenergic agonism without desensitization. Eur Heart J. 1991; 12 (suppl D): 178–181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Limas CJ, Limas C. Beta-adrenoceptor antibodies and genetics in dilated cardiomyopathy–an overview and review. Eur Heart J. 1991; 12 (suppl D): 175–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Magnusson Y, Wallukat G, Waagstein F, Hjalmarson A, Hoebeke J. Autoimmunity in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: characterization of antibodies against the beta 1-adrenoceptor with positive chronotropic effect. Circulation. 1994; 89: 2760–2767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Rosenbaum MB, Chiale PA, Schejtman D, Levin M, Elizari MV. Antibodies to beta-adrenergic receptors disclosing agonist-like properties in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and Chagas’ heart disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994; 5: 367–375.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Borda ES, Sterin-Borda L. Antiadrenergic and muscarinic receptor antibodies in Chagas’ cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 1996; 54: 149–156.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Matsui S, Fu M. Characteristic distribution of circulating autoantibodies against G-protein coupled cardiovascular receptors in patients with idiopathic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 1996; 54: 143–147.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Jahns R, Boivin V, Siegmund C, Inselmann G, Lohse MJ, Boege F. Autoantibodies activating human beta1-adrenergic receptors are associated with reduced cardiac function in chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1999; 99: 649–654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Fu ML, Herlitz H, Wallukat G, Hilme E, Hedner T, Hoebeke J, Hjalmarson A. Functional autoimmune epitope on alpha 1-adrenergic receptors in patients with malignant hypertension. Lancet. 1994; 344: 1660–1663.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Luther HP, Homuth V, Wallukat G. Alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antibodies in patients with primary hypertension. Hypertension. 1997; 29: 678–682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Dorffel Y, Wallukat G, Bochnig N, Homuth V, Herberg M, Dorffel W, Pruss A, Chaoui R, Scholze J. Agonistic AT(1) receptor autoantibodies and monocyte stimulation in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2003; 16: 827–833.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Fu ML, Herlitz H, Schulze W, Wallukat G, Micke P, Eftekhari P, Sjogren KG, Hjalmarson A, Muller-Esterl W, Hoebeke J. Autoantibodies against the angiotensin receptor (AT1) in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 945–953.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Cunningham MW, Meissner HC, Heuser JS, Pietra BA, Kurahara DK, Leung DY. Anti-human cardiac myosin autoantibodies in Kawasaki syndrome. J Immunol. 1999; 163: 1060–1065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Galvin JE, Hemric ME, Ward K, Cunningham MW. Cytotoxic mAb from rheumatic carditis recognizes heart valves and laminin. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 217–224.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Adderson EE, Shikhman AR, Ward KE, Cunningham MW. Molecular analysis of polyreactive monoclonal antibodies from rheumatic carditis: human anti-N-acetylglucosamine/anti-myosin antibody V region genes. J Immunol. 1998; 161: 2020–2031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Shikhman AR, Greenspan NS, Cunningham MW. A subset of mouse monoclonal antibodies cross-reactive with cytoskeletal proteins and group A streptococcal M proteins recognizes N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamine. J Immunol. 1993; 151: 3902–3913.[Abstract]

18. Sosunov EA, Anyukhovsky EP, Rosen MR. Effects of exogenous neuropeptide Y on automaticity of isolated Purkinje fibers and atrium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1996; 28: 967–975.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Li Y, Heuser JS, Cunningham LC, Kosanke SD, Cunningham MW. Mimicry and antibody-mediated cell signaling in autoimmune myocarditis. J Immunol. 2006; 177: 8234–8240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Wallukat G, Kayser A, Wollenberger A. The beta 1-adrenoceptor as antigen: functional aspects. Eur Heart J. 1995; 16 (suppl O): 85–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Krause EG, Bartel S, Beyerdorfer I, Wallukat G. Activation of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in cardiomyocytes by anti-beta 1-adrenoceptor autoantibodies from patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Blood Press. 1996; 3 (suppl): 37–40.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Jahns R, Boivin V, Hein L, Triebel S, Angermann CE, Ertl G, Lohse MJ. Direct evidence for a beta 1-adrenergic receptor-directed autoimmune attack as a cause of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest. 2004; 113: 1419–1429.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Omerovic E, Bollano E, Andersson B, Kujacic V, Schulze W, Hjalmarson A, Waagstein F, Fu M. Induction of cardiomyopathy in severe combined immunodeficiency mice by transfer of lymphocytes from patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Autoimmunity. 2000; 32: 271–280.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Matsui S, Fu M, Hayase M, Katsuda S, Yamaguchi N, Teraoka K, Kurihara T, Takekoshi N. Transfer of rabbit autoimmune cardiomyopathy into severe combined immunodeficiency mice. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2003; 42 (suppl 1): S99–S103.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Witebsky E, Rose NR, Terplan K, Paine JR, Egan RW. Chronic thyroiditis and autoimmunization. JAMA. 1957; 164: 1439–1447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Muller J, Wallukat G, Dandel M, Bieda H, Brandes K, Spiegelsberger S, Nissen E, Kunze R, Hetzer R. Immunoglobulin adsorption in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2000; 101: 385–391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Wallukat G, Muller J, Hetzer R. Specific removal of beta1-adrenergic autoantibodies from patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1806.[Free Full Text]

28. Bravo E, Fouad-Tarazi F, Rossi G, Imamura M, Lin WW, Madkour MA, Wicker P, Cressman MD, Saragoca M. A reevaluation of the hemodynamics of pheochromocytoma. Hypertension. 1990; 15 (2 suppl): I128–I131.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Grundy SM. Metabolic syndrome: connecting and reconciling cardiovascular and diabetes worlds. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 1093–1100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Grundy SM. Metabolic syndrome: a multiplex cardiovascular risk factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92: 399–404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Cruickshank JM. Beta-blockers continue to surprise us. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 354–364.[Free Full Text]

32. Cruickshank JM. Beta-blockers and diabetes: the bad guys come good. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2002; 16: 457–470.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Stavrakis, X. Yu, E. Patterson, S. Huang, S. R. Hamlett, L. Chalmers, R. Pappy, M. W. Cunningham, S. A. Morshed, T. F. Davies, et al.
Activating autoantibodies to the beta-1 adrenergic and m2 muscarinic receptors facilitate atrial fibrillation in patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 29, 2009; 54(14): 1309 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Verlohren, D. N. Muller, F. C. Luft, and R. Dechend
Immunology in Hypertension, Preeclampsia, and Target-Organ Damage
Hypertension, September 1, 2009; 54(3): 439 - 443.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/5/829    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.096750v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kem, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kem, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, M. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Type 1 diabetes
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other etiology
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing