| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:148.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Institute of Physiology and Center for Applied Genomics (M.P., V.L., V.Z., P.M., M.S., V.K.), Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic; the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (L.K.), Prague, Czech Republic; the Institute of Molecular Genetics and Center for Applied Genomics (P.J., J.F.), Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic; the Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics (M.P., V.K., D.K.), First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; the University of Michigan Medical School (N.Q.), Ann Arbor; the Department of Laboratory Medicine (J.-M.W., D.C., T.W.K.), University of California, San Francisco; and the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre (T.J.A.), Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Correspondence to Theodore Kurtz, MD, UCSF Department of Laboratory Medicine, 185 Berry Street, Suite 290, San Francisco, CA 94107. E-mail KurtzT{at}Labmed2.ucsf.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: fatty liver quantitative trait loci rats inbred SHR metabolic syndrome X hypertension sterol regulatory element binding protein 1
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hypertension is often accompanied by a variety of complex metabolic disturbances including fatty liver.3,4 Recently, Donati et al reported that 30% of nondiabetic subjects with arterial hypertension may have hepatic steatosis despite normal liver enzymes.4 Although obesity, level of physical activity, and diet are likely factors modulating susceptibility or resistance to fatty liver, it is also possible that genetic factors may influence whether an individual is at high or low risk for hepatic steatosis. Recently, in recombinant inbred (RI) strains derived from the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), we mapped a QTL on Chromosome 10 that was associated with effects on hepatic cholesterol levels in animals fed a high cholesterol diet (designated Hcl1 [Hepatic cholesterol level 1]).5 We subsequently found that the SHR harbors a rare allele of the gene encoding sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP-1) that maps to a region of rat Chromosome 10 overlapping the QTL regulating hepatic cholesterol levels.6
The gene for SREBP-1 (Srebf1) has 2 alternate promoters and codes for 2 protein isoforms designated SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c, both of which are well known transcriptional regulators of hepatic cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis.7 SREBP-2 is another SREBP isoform that is considered to play a greater role in the regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis than the SREBP-1 isoforms.7 However, the gene encoding SREBP-2 (Srebf2) is located on a different chromosome than Srebf1 and in our previous mapping studies, we did not detect any QTLs in the vicinity of Srebf2 on Chromosome 7 linked to the regulation of hepatic cholesterol levels. In addition, association studies in humans and animals have provided indirect evidence that Srebf1 might constitute a QTL regulating inherited variation in cholesterol and lipid metabolism.8,9 Given these observations, we focused on whether Srebf1 constitutes a bona fide QTL on Chromosome 10 that regulates inherited variation in hepatic cholesterol levels and risk for dietary induced hepatic steatosis in the SHR. Based on stringent criteria proposed by Glazier et al for QTL identification including linkage studies, fine genetic mapping, sequence analysis, and both in vitro and in vivo functional tests of the candidate gene,1 we now report that Srebf1 is a QTL regulating liver cholesterol levels and susceptibility to hepatic steatosis in SHRs fed a high cholesterol diet.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
99.8%.14 After 10 backcross generations, the offspring were intercrossed to produce the homozygous congenic line for study.
|
We next refined the map location of the Hcl1 QTL to a 2.5 Mbp segment of Chromosome 10 by deriving a congenic subline, SHR.BN-D10Mgh3/D10Rat85 (hereafter referred to as the SHR-Chr.10a congenic subline) and comparing it to the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain with respect to hepatic cholesterol levels. Specifically, we used backcross breeding with SSLP selection markers and the RFLP in Srebf1 to derive the SHR-Chr.10a congenic subline that is genetically identical to the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain except for approximately 2.5 Mbp of Chromosome 10 in the region of Srebf1; the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain carries the BN allele of Srebf1 whereas the SHR-Chr.10a congenic subline carries the SHR allele of Srebf1 (Figure 1). Accordingly, any differences in hepatic cholesterol levels observed between the original SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain and the SHR-Chr.10a congenic subline must be a consequence of genetic differences within the 2.5 Mbp differential chromosome segment that includes Srebf1.
SHR Transgenic Strain Derivation
In rats fed a high-cholesterol diet, we found that the SHR allele of Srebf1, compared with the wild-type BN allele of Srebf1, was associated with decreased hepatic levels of SREBP-1c mRNA and protein, and decreased hepatic levels of cholesterol (see results). Therefore, in SHR, we tested whether transgenic augmentation of hepatic SREBP-1c activity to a degree similar to that observed in the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain harboring wild-type Srebf1 would restore hepatic cholesterol levels. We derived transgenic SHRs by microinjection of zygotes from the highly inbred SHR progenitor strain with a construct containing a truncated portion of the human cDNA encoding SREBP-1c (kindly provided by J.Horton and J. Goldstein, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas).15 The construct contained the rat PEPCK promoter fused to human SREBP-1c cDNA encoding amino acids 1 to 436 followed by 2 stop codons and human growth hormone (GH) poly A signal. This construct generates a dominant positive NH2-terminal fragment of SREBP-1c expressed in the liver that can enter the nucleus and be transcriptionally active without a requirement for proteolytic release from cell membranes.15 We intercrossed transgene positive rats to fix the transgene to be present in all rats in the transgenic colony and then compared the transgenic rats to the inbred SHR progenitor strain from which they were derived. We assessed the activity of SREBP-1c by measuring hepatic expression of stearoyl-coenzyme A (CoA) desaturase 1 (SCD-1), a key transcriptional target of SREBP-1 that plays a major role in the hepatic synthesis of cholesterol esters and triglycerides.15,16
Experimental Protocol and Hepatic Lipid Measurements
We fed all rats a standard diet until 7 weeks of age at which time they were switched to a diet containing 2% cholesterol (3018.03 diet, Hope Farms). We used a high-cholesterol diet in all experiments because this was the same diet used in the original QTL mapping studies.5 In pilot studies, we also found that administration of the high-cholesterol diet was necessary to elicit significant differences in hepatic lipid levels between the SHR progenitor and the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain. After 4 weeks of feeding the high-cholesterol diet, we euthanized the animals and obtained liver samples for measurement of hepatic cholesterol and for preparation of mRNA to quantify gene expression levels as described further below. To measure hepatic cholesterol levels, frozen liver tissues were powdered under liquid N2 and extracted in chloroform-methanol (2:1 v/v). After adding 2% KH2PO4, the solution was centrifuged and the organic phase was removed and evaporated to dryness under N2. The residue was then dissolved in isopropyl alcohol, and cholesterol levels determined by enzymatic assay (Pliva-Lachema).
Gene Expression and Protein Measurements
We used real-time PCR to measure hepatic expression levels of mRNAs for SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c. As a measure of SREBP-1 activity, we also determined the expression of stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1), a major target gene of SREBP-1. RNA was extracted from liver using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and cDNA was prepared and analyzed by real-time PCR testing using QuantiTect SYBR Green reagents (Qiagen Inc) on an Opticon continuous fluorescence detector (MJ Research) as previously described.17 Gene expression levels were normalized relative to the expression of cyclophilin, which served as the internal control, with results being determined in triplicate using the preferred method of Muller et al.18,19 We used Western blot analysis to measure hepatic levels of both precursor and mature forms of SREBP-1. SREBP-1 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, catalog # sc-8984) developed against a recombinant protein corresponding to amino acids 41 to 200 of SREBP-1 of human origin and that cross reacts with the mouse and rat SREBP-1 but not with SREBP-2. SREBP-1c is the predominant SREBP-1 isoform in liver and the immunofixation results are presumed to largely reflect detection of SREBP-1c.20
Transfection Studies and DNA Sequence Analysis
As described in the results, we found reduced hepatic expression of the mRNA encoding SREBP-1c in the SHR progenitor strain compared with the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain. Therefore, we sequenced the SREBP-1c promoter regions of the SHR and BN strains and tested for strain differences in promoter function using in vitro transfection assays. Transfection studies were performed in HEK293 cells cultured in 10% fetal bovine serum. We cotransfected the cells with a firefly luciferase reporter vector pGL3 including nucleotides –1228 to +60 of the SHR and BN promoter regions together with a renilla luciferase reporter vector under control of the CMV promoter as a reference plasmid. Both promoter constructs were directly verified by DNA sequencing. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized by renilla luciferase activity and the results (n=5 in each group) expressed as fold change relative to that of the empty pGL3 control vector. DNA sequencing was performed on PCR amplified products using an Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer and the BigDye Terminator v 3.1 Cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems). Strain differences in DNA sequence were confirmed by analysis of at least 2 different rats from each strain.
Blood Pressure Measurements
We measured arterial blood pressures using radiotelemetry in 10- to 11-week-old unanesthetized, unrestrained rats from the original SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain and the SHR-Chr.10a congenic subline that were genetically identical except for the 2.5 Mbp segment of Chromosome 10 harboring Srebf1. All rats were allowed to recover for at least 5 to 7 days after surgical implantation of radiotelemetry transducers before the start of blood pressure recordings. Pulsatile pressures were recorded in 5-second bursts every 5 minutes throughout the day and night, and 24-hour averages for systolic arterial blood pressure were calculated for each rat for a 1-week period. The results from each rat in the same group were then averaged to obtain the group means.
Statistical Analysis
We studied 5 to 10 rats per group and performed the statistical analysis using t tests or rank sum tests for 2 group comparisons and ANOVA with Student-Newman-Keuls or Holm-Sidak testing for multiple group comparisons. All results are expressed as means±SEM unless otherwise specified.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Hepatic triglyceride levels paralleled the hepatic cholesterol levels although the strain differences in triglycerides were not as great as the strain differences in cholesterol; liver triglyceride content in the SHR-Chr.10a subline carrying the SHR variant of Srebf1, 28.1±1.5 µmol/g, was similar to that in the SHR progenitor strain, 26.4±1.0 µmol/g, and significantly lower than that in the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain carrying the BN variant of Srebf1, 37.9±2.8 µmol/g, (P<0.05 by Holm Sidak multiple comparison testing). We did not detect any differences in radiotelemetry measurements of 24-hour average systolic blood pressures between the SHR-Chr.10a subline harboring the SHR variant of Srebf1 and the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain harboring the BN variant of Srebf1, 150±1.3 mm Hg versus 150±2.2 mm Hg, respectively. Thus, although the 2.5 Mbp segment of Chromosome 10 including Srebf1 was linked to the regulation of hepatic lipid levels, it did not appear to affect blood pressure.
Gene Expression and Protein Analysis
Real-time PCR assays demonstrated lower amounts of mRNA for SREBP-1c in livers of the SHR progenitor strain compared with the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain that carries the Srebf1 gene of the BN rat (Figure 3A). Hepatic expression of SREBP-1a mRNA was not different between the two strains (data not shown). The lower hepatic levels of SREBP-1c mRNA in the SHR progenitor strain compared with the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain were also associated with lower hepatic levels of both the precursor and mature forms of SREBP-1 protein (Figure 3B). In addition, real-time PCR analysis showed that hepatic expression of the gene encoding stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1), a major target regulated by SREBP-1, was significantly lower in the SHR progenitor strain compared with the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain (Figure 4A). Thus, the SHR allele for Srebf1 is associated with deficient expression of both SREBP-1 mRNA and protein and reduced SREBP-1 target gene activity compared with the BN allele.
|
|
Complementation Studies in the SREBP-1c Transgenic Strain
We performed functional tests in transgenic rats to further test the causal relationship between reduced hepatic levels of SREBP-1 and reduced hepatic levels of cholesterol in SHRs fed a high-cholesterol diet. Hepatic activity of SREBP-1 in the SHR was augmented by transgenic expression of a dominant positive form of SREBP-1c in the liver under control of the PEPCK promoter. In mice, this construct has been previously shown to increase hepatic SREBP-1c activity and cause modest increases in hepatic levels of cholesterol.15 Transgenic augmentation of SREBP-1c in the SHR restored both SCD1 target gene expression (Figure 4A) and hepatic concentrations of cholesterol to levels similar to those observed in the SHR-Chr.10 congenic strain (Figure 2). Thus, augmentation of SREBP-1c activity by expressing either the wild-type form of SREBP-1c in congenic rats or a dominant positive form of SREBP-1c in transgenic rats complemented the low hepatic cholesterol levels linked to the SHR allele of Srebf1.
Sequence Analysis and Transfection Studies
Sequence analysis of Srebpf1 coding regions previously revealed that the SHR harbors a rare variant causing a valine to methionine substitution in the COOH terminal segment of both isoforms of SREBP-1.6 However, in transfection studies with SHR and BN cDNAs and a sterol regulatory element-1 reporter plasmid, we have been unable to detect any functional effect of this coding sequence variant on SREBP-1 activity (T.K. and M.P., unpublished observations, 2002). Studies of mRNA stability in isolated hepatocytes derived from the SHR progenitor and congenic strains fed a high cholesterol diet did not show any clear differences that would account for the strain differences in mRNA levels for SREBP-1c. We therefore sequenced approximately 1300 base pairs of the SHR and BN gene promoter regions for SREBP-1c and found several polymorphisms within 850 base pairs of the transcription start site including a nucleotide substitution and 2 insertion variants in the SHR strain (Figure S1, please see http://hyper.ahajournals.org). None of these polymorphisms mapped directly to known regulatory elements within the rat SREBP-1c promoter.21 However, functional testing in a luciferase reporter assay of promoter segments from the SHR and BN strains showed lower activity of the SHR promoter than the BN promoter, consistent with the possibility that the strain differences in SREBP-1c mRNA levels are determined at the transcriptional level (Figure 4B).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the current studies in the SHR-BN model, we have found that Srebf1 constitutes a QTL regulating hepatic cholesterol levels and susceptibility to dietary induced accumulation of liver cholesterol. The assertion that Srebf1 is a QTL influencing hepatic cholesterol levels in the SHR-BN model is based on the stringent criteria proposed by Glazier et al for QTL identification in studies of complex traits1: 1st criterion, Linkage. In RI strains fed a high cholesterol diet, a QTL associated with effects on hepatic cholesterol levels maps to rat Chromosome 10 near the Srebf1 candidate gene5,6; 2nd criterion, Fine mapping. In recombinant congenic sublines derived from the SHR and BN strains, the QTL regulating hepatic cholesterol levels and the Srebf1 positional candidate gene map to an interval of approximately 2.5 Mbp together with effects on mRNA and protein levels for SREBP-1; 3rd criterion, Sequence analysis. The SHR and BN strains carry different alleles for Srebf1 including variants in the promoter region for the SREBP-1c isoform; 4th criterion, Functional tests of candidate genes in vitro and in vivo. Compared with the BN allele for Srebf1, the SHR allele is associated with (1) reduced SREBP-1c promoter activity in vitro, (2) reduced SREBP-1c mRNA, protein, and target gene expression levels in vivo, and (3) reduced hepatic cholesterol levels in the environment of a high cholesterol diet. Finally, in congenic and transgenic strains of SHR, augmentation of SREBP-1c activity with wild-type or dominant positive forms of SREBP-1c increased liver cholesterol levels to a similar degree, thereby confirming that Srebf1 is a QTL regulating hepatic lipids in the SHR progenitors.
The finding that Srebf1 is a QTL influencing liver cholesterol levels in the SHR-BN model is consistent with the known biology of SREBP-1c as a transcriptional regulator of hepatic cholesterol metabolism.7 Our findings are also consistent with the results of association studies in humans suggesting that common polymorphisms affecting SREBP-1 may exert quantitative effects on cholesterol synthesis.8 In the current studies, the differential effect of the SHR versus BN allele on promoter function in vitro was less than the strain difference in mRNA expression observed in vivo. This could be due to the fact that the in vitro promoter studies are performed under artificial conditions that do not fully mimic the cellular milieu that can influence gene expression responses in vivo. It is also possible that additional promoter/enhancer polymorphisms might exist beyond those identified in this study that could further affect Srebf1 expression in vivo. Notwithstanding these limitations, the current findings together with the results of previous association studies indicate that genetic research in the SHR can be useful for molecular isolation of QTL relevant to the regulation of complex metabolic traits in humans.
Although we have found that the SHR and BN variants have different effects on hepatic cholesterol metabolism, we have not found evidence suggesting differential effects of these alleles on blood pressure. The current results indicate that the Srebf1 allele of the SHR tends to decrease risk for dietary induced accumulation of liver cholesterol compared with the Srebf1 allele of the BN rat. Given that hypertension is often associated with multiple metabolic disturbances including fatty liver,3 the naïve expectation might have been for an opposite result, namely, that the Srebf1 allele of the SHR would be linked to greater accumulation of hepatic cholesterol than the Srebf1 allele of the normotensive BN strain. However, it is important to recognize that most nondiabetic patients with hypertension do not have fatty liver and 50% do not have the metabolic syndrome.4,22 The current findings suggest the possibility that some hypertensive patients, like the progenitor strain of the SHR, may harbor variants in Srebf1 that tend to protect against fatty liver whereas others, like the congenic strain of SHR carrying the BN allele for Srebf1, may harbor variants in Srebf1 that tend to increase the risk for fatty liver.
Perspectives
Based on stringent criteria for QTL identification in studies of genetically complex traits, we have found that Srebf1 constitutes a QTL regulating liver cholesterol levels in rats fed a high-cholesterol diet. These findings support the possibility that naturally occurring variants in Srebf1 might influence susceptibility to dietary induced accumulation of hepatic cholesterol in humans. Finally, given that hepatic steatosis is a common feature of the metabolic syndrome, future studies on the relationship between Srebf1 polymorphisms and risk for disordered glucose metabolism in the SHR-BN model should be of additional interest.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL35018, HL63709, HL56028, and TW01236 to T.W.K., grants 1P05ME791 and 1M6837805002 from the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic to M.P. and J.F. and MSM0021620807 to V.K., research project AV0Z 50110509 to the Institute of Physiology, and grants 7403-3 and 8545-3 from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic to L.K. and M.P., and by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme through the Integrated Project EURATools (contract no. LSHG-CT-2005-019015) to M.P. and T.J.A. M.P. is an international research scholar of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Disclosures
None.
Received August 30, 2007; first decision September 17, 2007; accepted November 8, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Pravenec M, Kurtz TW. Molecular genetics of experimental hypertension and the metabolic syndrome: from gene pathways to new therapies. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 941–952.
3. Brookes MJ, Cooper BT. Hypertension and fatty liver: guilty by association? J Hum Hypertens. 2007; 21: 264–270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Donati G, Stagni B, Piscaglia F, Venturoli N, Morselli-Labate AM, Rasciti L, Bolondi L. Increased prevalence of fatty liver in arterial hypertensive patients with normal liver enzymes: role of insulin resistance. Gut. 2004; 53: 1020–1023.
5. Bottger A, Lankhorst E, van Lith HA, van Zutphen LF, Zídek V, Musilová A, Simáková M, Poledne R, Bílá V, Kren V, Pravenec M. A genetic and correlation analysis of liver cholesterol concentration in rat recombinant inbred strains fed a high cholesterol diet. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998; 246: 272–275.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Pravenec M, Jansa P, Kostka V, Zidek V, Kren V, Forejt J, Kurtz TW. Identification of a mutation in ADD1/SREBP-1 in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Mamm Genome. 2001; 12: 295–298.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109: 1125–1131.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Laaksonen R, Thelen KM, Paiva H, Matinheikki J, Vesalainen R, Janatuinen T, Knuuti J, Rontu R, von Bergmann K, Lutjohann D, Lehtimaki T. Genetic variant of the SREBF-1 gene is significantly related to cholesterol synthesis in man. Atherosclerosis. 2006; 185: 206–209.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Biddinger SB, Almind K, Miyazaki M, Kokkotou E, Ntambi JM, Kahn CR. Effects of diet and genetic background on sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c, stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1, and the development of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2005; 54: 1314–1323.
10. SSLPS: Rat Genome Database Web Site, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. World Wide Web. Available at: http://rgd.mcw.edu/objectSearch/sslpQuery.jsp. Accessed June, 2007.
11. Pravenec M, Landa V, Zidek V, Musilova A, Kren V, Kazdova L, Aitman TJ, Glazier AM, Ibrahimi A, Abumrad NA, Qi N, Wang JM, St Lezin EM, Kurtz TW. Transgenic rescue of defective Cd36 ameliorates insulin resistance in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Nature Genet. 2001; 27: 156–158.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Aitman TJ, Glazier AM, Wallace CA, Cooper LD, Norsworthy PJ, Wahid FN, Al-Majali KM, Trembling PM, Mann CJ, Shoulders CC, Graf D, St Lezin E, Kurtz TW, Kren V, Pravenec M, Ibrahimi A, Abumrad NA, Stanton LW, Scott J. Identification of Cd36 (Fat) as an insulin-resistance gene causing defective fatty acid and glucose metabolism in hypertensive rats. Nature Genet. 1999; 21: 76–83.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Pravenec M, Zidek V, Simakova M, Kren V, Krenova D, Horky K, Jachymova M, Mikova B, Kazdova L, Aitman TJ, Churchill PC, Webb RC, Hingarh NH, Yang Y, Wang JM, Lezin EM, Kurtz TW. Genetics of Cd36 and the clustering of multiple cardiovascular risk factors in spontaneous hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 1651–1657.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Silver L. Mouse Genetics: Concepts and Applications. Oxford University Press; 1995.
15. Shimano H, Horton JD, Shimomura I, Hammer RE, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Isoform 1c of sterol regulatory element binding protein is less active than isoform 1a in livers of transgenic mice and in cultured cells. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 846–854.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Miyazaki M, Kim YC, Gray-Keller MP, Attie AD, Ntambi JM. The biosynthesis of hepatic cholesterol esters and triglycerides is impaired in mice with a disruption of the gene for stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 30132–30138.
17. Pravenec M, Kazdova L, Landa V, Zidek V, Mlejnek P, Jansa P, Wang J, Qi N, Kurtz TW. Transgenic and recombinant resistin impair skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 45209–45215.
18. Muller PY, Janovjak H, Miserez AR, Dobbie Z. Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2002; 32: 1372–1374, 1376, 1378–1379.
19. Muller PY, Janovjak H, Miserez AR. Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real time RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 2002; 33: 514–517.
20. Shimomura I, Shimano H, Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Differential expression of exons 1a and 1c in mRNAs for sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 in human and mouse organs and cultured cells. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 838–845.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Deng X, Cagen LM, Wilcox HG, Park EA, Raghow R, Elam MB. Regulation of the rat SREBP-1c promoter in primary rat hepatocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 290: 256–262.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Garcia-Puig J, Ruilope LM, Luque M, Fernandez J, Ortega R, Dal-Re R. Glucose metabolism in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Med. 2006; 119: 318–326.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |