| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:345.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cardiovascular Kidney Hypertension Institute and Angiogenesis Program of the Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Correspondence to Christopher S. Wilcox, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Rd, NW, PHC F6003, Washington, DC 20007. E-mail wilcoxch{at}georgetown.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Goldblatt hypertension renal oxygen tension renal blood flow angiotensin receptor blockers angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, acute infusions of Ang II into rats increase renal NO generation and increase the dependency of renal blood flow (RBF) on NO.10,11 Moreover, studies in the early 2K,1C rat model12–14 have shown that the acute administration of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), or nonselective angiotensin receptor blockade with saralasin, reduces the RBF, and thereby the renal oxygen (O2) delivery, and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and thereby the renal tubular sodium transport (TNa) in the clipped kidney. The consequences for renal oxygenation are not clear, because renal tissue PO2 should fall after a reduction in RBF but might rise after a reduction in TNa, because this determines renal O2 usage (QO2).15,16 ACEIs limit the generation of Ang II and thereby limit the activation of both Ang II type 1 (AT1) and Ang II type 2 (AT2) receptors, which have opposite effects on RBF and renal NO generation in renal wrap hypertension.17 In contrast, selective AT2 receptor blockade with PD-123,319 decreases renal interstitial NO and cGMP in both kidneys in this model17 and reduces renal interstitial NO in salt-depleted rats.18 This is important, because Beierwaltes and colleagues19,20 have shown that NO maintains renal function in the clipped kidney of the 2K,1C model.
Anderson et al21 have proposed that increased plasma levels of Ang II in the early 2K,1C model are homeostatic adjustments to provide a sufficient glomerular capillary pressure to sustain GFR. Although prolonged infusions of Ang II in normal rats may impair renal NO activity10 by induction of oxidative stress,8 more short-term infusions of Ang II into normal rats increase renal NO generation.10 Any increase in NO activity in the kidneys may reduce QO2 for tubular Na+ transport.22 The present work is designed to investigate the hypothesis that Ang II induced activation of AT2 receptors and NO synthase (NOS) sustains renal O2 availability in the clipped kidney of 2K,1C rats. This is of special importance, because the hemodynamic response to an acute challenge with ACEI is the most well-characterized clinical test of functional and reversible renovascular hypertension.23
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Groups 1 to 5 assessed the effects of acute administration of ACEI using clearance and renal venous sampling methods. Rats (n=8 per group) were prepared for measurements of mean arterial pressure, GFR, renal plasma flow and RBF by collecting urine separately from each kidney. The GFR and renal plasma flow were assessed from the clearance of [14C]-inulin. Renal plasma flow was calculated from the clearance of inulin factored by the AV extraction of inulin.24
Forty-five minutes after completion of the surgery, 2K,1C or sham rats of groups 2 and 4 received an intravenous injection of either enalaprilat (0.3 mg · kg–1 body weight [bw] dissolved in 0.3 mL of 0.154 mol/L NaCl solution, followed by an infusion of 0.3 mg · kg bw–1 · h–1; Novaplus 1.25 mg · mL–1, Baxter Healthcare Corporation) or volume-matched vehicle (group 1 and 3) or had the RPP lowered to the level recorded after enalaprilat by constricting a suprarenal aortic clamp. The RPP was adjusted by constriction of the suprarenal clamp and was monitored by a pressure catheter placed in the femoral artery below the level of the clamp. Ten minutes thereafter, there was a 30-minute clearance period with blood sampling from the femoral artery and both renal veins for measurement of blood gases and [14C] activity.24 Blood gas and O2 content were analyzed in a co-oximeter (Instrumentation Labs Inc).
2K,1C rats (n=8 per group) in groups of 6 to 10 had both kidneys immobilized in plastic cups, while renal cortical PO2 and cortical blood flow (CBF) were measured with O2 microelectrodes (Unisense) and laser Doppler needle probes (Transonic Systems Inc), as described previously.7,25 Measurements were made before and after injections of enalaprilat (0.3 mg · kg bw–1 bolus + 0.3 mg · kg bw–1 · h–1) alone (group 6) or after PD-123,319 (1 mg · kg bw–1 bolus + 1 mg · kg bw–1 · h–1, Sigma Aldrich)26 followed after 30 minutes by enalaprilat (group 7), after candesartan alone (1 mg · kg bw–1 bolus +1 mg · kg bw–1 · h–1, kind gift from Astra Zeneca, Södertälje, Sweden; manufacturer-recommended dose for maximal inhibition of AT1 receptors in vivo), followed after 30 minutes by enalaprilat (group 8), or after NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) alone (10 mg · kg–1 bolus + 10 mg · kg bw–1 · h–1, Sigma Aldrich; group 9), followed after 30 minutes by enalaprilat or after suprarenal aortic clamp (group 10). The increased RPP caused by L-NAME was corrected by a suprarenal aortic clamp.
ANOVA was used to compare multiple data sets. When appropriate, this was followed by Bonferroni posthoc Students t tests. Relative changes were analyzed using nonparametric statistics (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software). For all of the comparisons, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All of the values are expressed as mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Basal values for renal vascular resistance were similar in all of the kidneys (data not shown). ACEI increased the renal vascular resistance substantially in clipped kidneys (Figure 1A) and reduced the renal vascular PO2 below the value recorded in the other groups (Figure 1B). This accounts for the greater O2 extraction (Table 3). TNa/QO2 did not change significantly after any of the applied treatments.
|
Data from the contralateral, nonclipped kidney are shown for comparison in Table 4. The acute administration of the ACEI reduced the renal vascular PO2 in this kidney as well, albeit not to the levels of the postclip kidney after ACEI. Otherwise, there were no significant changes in the function of this kidney.
|
ACEI reduced the CBF significantly in the clipped kidney (Figure 2A), similar to the reduction in total RBF recorded by clearance methods in rats of group 4 (Table 1). All of the treatments, except for PD-123,319, reduced RPP (Figure 2). Although all of the treatments reduced the CBF of the clipped kidney, it was reduced to a greater extent by the ACEI than by the clamp (Figure 2A).
|
The baseline renal cortical PO2, before any intervention, was reduced uniformly in clipped kidneys (Table 2). The acute administration of enalaprilat, PD-123,319, and L-NAME all reduced the PO2 of the clipped kidney, whereas candesartan was ineffective, and the PO2 increased after clamping (Figure 2B). Enalaprilat had no additional effect on the cortical PO2 in the clipped kidney when administered 30 minutes after PD-123,319 or L-NAME. In contrast, candesartan did not reduce the PO2 of the clipped kidney and did not block the fall in PO2 produced by a subsequent infusion of enalaprilat (Figure 2B).
The responses in CBF and cortical PO2 after enalaprilat, PD-123,319, candesartan, L-NAME, or mechanically lowered RPP in the contralateral nonclipped kidney are presented in Table 5. CBF in this kidney was reduced by enalaprilat after PD-123,319 and by L-NAME. These treatments also reduced renal cortical PO2, which also fell modestly after PD-123,319 and candesartan.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The functionality of the renal artery stenosis in the present study was confirmed by the contralateral renal hypertrophy, reduced growth of the clipped kidney, sustained hypertension, and the functional changes in response to the ACEI, including reduced total RBF (–66%) and GFR (–65%) and increased O2 extraction from the blood manifest as an increased AV O2 (+100%).
The acute administration of an ACEI reduces the RBF of clipped kidneys of 2K,1C rats14,27 or dogs.28 This has been ascribed to a reduction in the RPP.14,27 However, we found a greater decrease in renal CBF after ACEI than after an equivalent reduction in the RPP. Therefore, we conclude that there is an additional mechanism that increases renal vascular resistance in clipped kidneys after ACEI related to a reduction in Ang II generation. NO maintains RBF during a high circulating level of Ang II3,10,11 and thereby maintains blood supply to the kidney during an acute challenge with Ang II.29 However, the NO released by Ang II from isolated perfused renal afferent arterioles is mediated via AT1 receptors.29,30 In contrast, the NO released by Ang II from the kidney cortex of salt-depleted rats or rats with renal wrap hypertension is mediated via AT2 receptors.31–33 The mRNA for AT2 receptors is upregulated in the aorta of mice with early 2K,1C hypertension.34 Moreover, AT2 receptor activation limits aortic contractions to Ang II in this model by phosphorylation of endothelial NOS and increasing vascular cGMP.34
NO generation in the clipped kidney may account for our finding that blockade of AT1 or AT2 receptors or NOS apparently prevented any further fall in the CBF of clipped kidneys with enalaprilat (Figure 2A). This confirms the conclusions of Beierwaltes and colleagues20,35 that the RBF of the clipped kidney of early 2K,1C renovascular hypertensive rats is highly dependent on NOS, although this effect wanes with time. This waning over time may explain why ACEI administration in early 2K,1C hypertensive rats reduces RBF, whereas RBF is maintained after ACEI in some patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis, where the condition is almost always of long duration.23,36 The immediate increase in renal NO generation in rats infused with Ang II is lost after 2 weeks of Ang II infusions likely because of the development of oxidative stress in the kidneys.37 Preservation of NO signaling in the clipped kidney of early 2K,1C rats may be because of the protective effect of a reduced RPP on NO signaling38 and on upregulation of NOS-I, -II, and -III in the renal cortex and medulla in kidneys downstream from a reduction in RPP.39
In a previous study, we reported a reduced TNa/QO2 in the basal state in clipped kidneys of 2K,1C rats, whereas the TNa/QO2 was unchanged in the present study. Although the reasons for this discrepancy are not clear, in both studies there was a reduction in PO2 of the renal cortex of the clipped kidney without a change in renal venous PO2. The PO2 of the kidney cortex of the clipped kidneys is maintained by Ang II, because the acute administration of an ACEI produces a further sharp fall in renal cortical PO2, despite strictly comparable reductions in RBF (–66%), GFR (–65%), or TNa (–64%).
Laycock et al22 reported that the normally close relationship between TNa and QO2 in the dogs kidney15 is perturbed after NOS inhibition, which increases QO2 despite a reduction in TNa. Because L-NAME blocks the fall in PO2 and CBF produced by ACEI in the clipped kidney in this study, we conclude that the generation of Ang II in the postclip kidney maintains oxygenation by the generation of NO. NO competes with O2 for terminal sites on the electron transport chain located in the mitochondrial membrane.40 The lower baseline cortical PO2 in the clipped kidney is in agreement with other states of excessive oxidative stress,5–7 which can cause functional NO deficiency in the kidney.41 The kidney in renovascular hypertension is indeed a site of increased NO/O2·– interaction, as shown by enhanced nitrotyrosine deposition.42 However, a reduction in RPP reduces the excretion of NO metabolites,43 reduces the directly measured NO activity in the cortex of the dog kidney,44 and reduces renal nitrotyrosine deposition, indicating a reduced NO/O2·– interaction.38
Unlike the effects of acute administration of ACEI in this study, the renal cortical PO2 recorded in the clipped kidney of early 2K,1C rats was not reduced after acute administration of candesartan in this study (Figure 2B) or after 2 weeks of candesartan in the study by Welch et al.5 Presumably, AT2 receptors are still active after candesartan administration, which may account for the unchanged PO2 after the ARB, yet the fall in PO2 after acute ACEI administration, which should reduce Ang II and thereby reduce the activation of AT2 receptors. The response to an ARB depends on the model in which it is tested. Thus, 2 weeks of ARB administration to spontaneously hypertensive rats improves renal cortical oxygenation independent of RPP.24 The combination of a sharp fall in RPP and a sharp fall in AT2 receptor activation after a reduction in Ang II concentration locally within the clipped kidney by ACEI may decrease the NO levels sufficiently to reduce the PO2 of the kidney cortex. Apparently, a reduction in RPP with intact Ang II generation is not itself sufficient to reduce PO2, which actually increased in the clipped kidney after clamping of its perfusion pressure to the levels accompanying ACEI administration.
Perspectives
This study has provided evidence for a novel intrarenal homeostatic role for Ang II, expressed via AT2 receptors and NO, to maintain RBF and O2 during renal ischemia caused, in this model, by a reduction in RPP in a kidney in which the blood flow capacity is limited by a renal artery clip. This is remarkable given the well-established efficacy of Ang II acting on AT1 receptors to reduce RBF and PO2 in normal kidneys.10,37 Renal tissue hypoxia may be critical in the development of hypertension8,45 and the progression of chronic kidney disease.9 Therefore, this finding of a protective role for Ang II acting on AT2 receptors for maintaining renal perfusion and oxygenation raises potential concerns for the use of ACEIs in conditions of acute renal ischemia that will require further study. Indeed, the acute administration of an ACEI has been shown to reduce renal hemodynamics more than an equally antihypertensive dose of ARB in human subjects with renal artery stenosis.46
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-68686), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-07183, DK-36079, DK-49870, and DK077858), and from the George E. Schreiner Chair of Nephrology.
Disclosures
None
Received July 12, 2007; first decision August 8, 2007; accepted November 16, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Goldblatt H, Lynch J, Hanzal RF, Summerville WW. Studies on experimental hypertension: I. The production of persistent elevation of systolic blood pressure by means of renal ischemia. J Exp Med. 1937; 49: 347–379.
3. Navar LG, Ichihara A, Chin SY, Imig JD. Nitric oxide-angiotensin II interactions in angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Acta Physiol Scand. 2000; 168: 139–147.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Wilcox CS, Cordozo J, Welch WJ. AT1 and TxA2/PGH2 receptors maintain hypertension throughout 2K,1C Goldblatt hypertension in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: R891–R896.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Welch WJ, Mendonca M, Aslam S, Wilcox CS. Roles of oxidative stress and AT1 receptors in renal hemodynamics and oxygenation in the post-clipped 2K,1C kidney. Hypertens. 2003; 41: 692–696.
6. Welch WJ, Baumgärtl H, Lübbers D, Wilcox CS. Renal oxygenation defects in the spontaneously hypertensive rat: role of AT1 receptors. Kidney Int. 2003; 63: 202–208.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Palm F, Cederberg J, Hansell P, Liss P, Carlsson PO. Reactive oxygen species cause diabetes-induced decrease in renal oxygen tension. Diabetologia. 2003; 46: 1153–1160.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Wilcox CS. Oxidative stress and nitric oxide deficiency in the kidney: a critical link to hypertension. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005; 289: R913–R935.
9. Fine LG, Orphanides C, Norman JT. Progressive renal disease: the chronic hypoxia hypothesis. Kidney Int. 1998; 65 (suppl): S74–S78.
10. Deng X, Welch WJ, Wilcox CS. Role of nitric oxide in short-term and prolonged effects of angiotensin II on renal hemodynamics. Hypertens. 1996; 27: 1173–1179.
11. Baylis C, Harvey J, Engels K. Acute nitric oxide blockade amplifies the renal vasoconstrictor actions of angiotensin II. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994; 5: 211–214.[Abstract]
12. Huang WC, Ploth DW, Navar LG. Effects of saralasin infusion on bilateral renal function in two-kidney, one-clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats. Clin Sci(Lond). 1982; 62: 573–579.
13. Jonker GJ, Visscher CA, DeZeeuw D, Huisman RM, Piers DA, Beekhuis H, van der Hem GK. Changes in renal function induced by ACE-inhibition in the conscious two-kidney, one-clip Goldblatt hypertensive dog. Nephron. 1992; 60: 226–231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Huang WC, Ploth DW, Bell PD, Work J, Navar LG. Bilateral renal function responses to converting enzyme inhibitor (SQ 20,881) in two-kidney, one clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats. Hypertens. 1981; 3: 285–293.
15. Lassen NA, Munck O, Thaysen JH. Oxygen consumption and sodium reabsorption in the kidney. Acta Physiol Scand. 1961; 51: 371–384.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Deetjen P, Kramer K. Die abhängigkeit des O2-verbrauchs der niere van der Na+-resorbtion. Arch Ges Physiol. 1961; 273: 636–650.[CrossRef]
17. Siragy HM, Carey RM. Protective role of the angiotensin AT2 receptor in a renal wrap hypertension model. Hypertens. 1999; 33: 1237–1242.
18. Siragy HM, de Gasparo M, Carey RM. Angiotensin type 2 receptor mediates valsartan-induced hypotension in conscious rats. Hypertens. 2000; 35: 1074–1077.
19. Beierwaltes WH, Potter DL, Carretero OA, Sigmon DH. Nitric oxide synthesis inhibition blocks reversal of two-kidney, one clip renovascular hypertension after unclipping. Hypertens. 1995; 25: 174–179.
20. Sigmon DH, Beierwaltes WH. Nitric oxide influences blood flow distribution in renovascular hypertension. Hypertens. 1994; 23: I34–I39.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Anderson WP, Denton KM, Woods RL, Alcorn D. Angiotensin II and the maintenance of GFR and renal blood flow during renal artery narrowing. Kidney Int. 1990; 30 (suppl): S109–S113.
22. Laycock SK, Vogel T, Forfia PR, Tuzman J, Xu X, Ochoa M, Thompson CI, Nasjletti A, Hintze TH. Role of nitric oxide in the control of renal oxygen consumption and the regulation of chemical work in the kidney. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 1263–1271.
23. Taylor A. Functional testing: ACEI renography. Semin Nephrol. 2000; 20: 437–444.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Welch WJ, Baumgärtl H, Lübbers D, Wilcox CS. Nephron PO2 and renal oxygen usage in the hypertensive rat kidney. Kidney Int. 2001; 59: 230–237.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Liss P, Nygren A, Revsbech NP, Ulfendahl HR. Intrarenal oxygen tension measured by a modified Clark electrode at normal and low blood pressure and after injection of x-ray contrast media. Pflugers Arch. 1997; 434: 705–711.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Duke LM, Widdop RE, Kett MM, Evans RG. AT(2) receptors mediate tonic renal medullary vasoconstriction in renovascular hypertension. Br J Pharmacol. 2005; 144: 486–492.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Huang WC, Navar LG. Effects of unclipping and converting enzyme inhibition on bilateral renal function in Goldblatt hypertensive rats. Kidney Int. 1983; 23: 816–822.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Jonker GJ, DeZeeuw D, Huisman RM, Piers DB, Beekhuis H, van der Hem GK. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition improves diagnostic procedures for renovascular hypertension in dogs. Hypertens. 1988; 12: 411–419.
29. Patzak A, Lai E, Persson PB, Persson AE. Angiotensin II-nitric oxide interaction in glomerular arterioles. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2005; 32: 410–414.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Thorup C, Kornfeld M, Goligorsky MS, Moore LC. AT1 receptor inhibition blunts angiotensin II-stimulated nitric oxide release in renal arteries. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10: S220–S224.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Carey RM. Update on the role of the AT2 receptor. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005; 14: 67–71.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Wang ZQ, Millatt LJ, Heiderstadt NT, Siragy HM, Johns RA, Carey RM. Differential regulation of renal angiotensin subtype AT1A and AT2 receptor protein in rats with angiotensin-dependent hypertension. Hypertens. 1999; 33: 96–101.
33. Siragy HM, Carey RM. The subtype 2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor mediates renal production of nitric oxide in conscious rats. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 264–269.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Hiyoshi H, Yayama K, Takano M, Okamoto H. Angiotensin type 2 receptor-mediated phosphorylation of eNOS in the aortas of mice with 2-kidney, 1-clip hypertension. Hypertens. 2005; 45: 967–973.
35. Sigmon DH, Beierwaltes WH. Influence of nitric oxide in the chronic phase of two-kidney, one clip renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 649–656.
36. Wilcox CS. Use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors for diagnosing renovascular hypertension. Kidney Int. 1993; 44: 1379–1390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Welch WJ, Blau J, Xie H, Chabrashvili T, Wilcox CS. Angiotensin-induced defects in renal oxygenation: role of oxidative stress. Am J Physiol. 2005; 288: H22–H28.
38. Barton CH, Ni Z, Vaziri ND. Enhanced nitric oxide inactivation in aortic coarctation-induced hypertension. Kidney Int. 2001; 60: 1083–1087.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Barton CH, Ni Z, Vaziri ND. Effect of severe aortic banding above the renal arteries on nitric oxide synthase isotype expression. Kidney Int. 2001; 59: 654–661.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Koivisto A, Pittner J, Froelich M, Perrson AEG. Oxygen-dependent inhibition of respiration in isolated renal tubules by nitric oxide. Kidney Int. 1999; 55: 2368–2375.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Wilcox CS, Gutterman DD. Focus on oxidative stress in the cariovascular and renal system. Am J Physiol. 2005; 288: H3–H6.
42. Bosse HM, Bachmann S. Immunohistochemically detected protein nitration indicates sites of renal nitric oxide release in Goldblatt hypertension. Hypertension. 1997; 30: 948–952.
43. Majid DSA, Godfrey M, Grisham MB, Navar LG. Relation between pressure natriuresis and urinary excretion of nitrate/nitrite in anesthetized dogs. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 860–865.
44. Majid DSA, Omoro SA, Chin SY, Navar LG. Intrarenal nitric oxide activity and pressure natriuresis in anesthetized dogs. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 262–272.
45. Barton CH, Ni Z, Vazari ND. Blood pressure response to hypoxia: role of nitric oxide synthase. Am J Hypertens. 2003; 16: 1043–1048.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Karanikas G, Becherer A, Wiesner K, Dudczak R, Kletter K. ACE inhibition is superior to angiotensin receptor blockade for renography in renal artery stenosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002; 29: 312–318.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Warner, S. I. Gomez, R. Bolterman, J. A. Haas, M. D. Bentley, L. O. Lerman, and J. C. Romero Regional decreases in renal oxygenation during graded acute renal arterial stenosis: a case for renal ischemia Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): R67 - R71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Evans, B. S. Gardiner, D. W. Smith, and P. M. O'Connor Intrarenal oxygenation: unique challenges and the biophysical basis of homeostasis Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): F1259 - F1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |