Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2008;51:367-375
Published online before print December 24, 2007, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.102111
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/2/367    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.102111v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banday, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lokhandwala, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banday, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lokhandwala, M. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension

(Hypertension. 2008;51:367.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Oxidative Stress Causes Renal Dopamine D1 Receptor Dysfunction and Salt-Sensitive Hypertension in Sprague-Dawley Rats

Anees A. Banday; Yuen-Sum Lau; Mustafa F. Lokhandwala

From the Heart and Kidney Institute, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Tex.

Correspondence to Anees A. Banday, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4800 Calhoun Rd, Houston, TX 77204. E-mail abanday{at}uh.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Renal dopamine plays an important role in maintaining sodium homeostasis and blood pressure (BP) during increased sodium intake. The present study was carried out to determine whether renal dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) dysfunction contributes to increase in salt sensitivity during oxidative stress. Male Sprague-Dawley rats, divided into various groups, received tap water (vehicle); 1% NaCl (high salt [HS]); L-buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), an oxidant; and HS plus BSO with or without Tempol, an antioxidant, for 12 days. Compared with vehicle, HS intake increased urinary dopamine production and decreased basal renal Na/K-ATPase activity but did not affect BP. BSO-treated rats exhibited oxidative stress and a mild increase in BP. In these rats, D1R expression and G protein coupling were reduced, and SKF38393, a D1R agonist, failed to inhibit Na/K-ATPase activity and promote sodium excretion. Concomitant administration of BSO and HS caused oxidative stress, D1R dysfunction, and a marked increase in BP. Although renal dopamine production was increased, it failed to reduce the basal Na/K-ATPase activity in these animals. Treatment of BSO plus HS rats with Tempol decreased oxidative stress and restored endogenous, as well as exogenous, D1R agonist-mediated Na/K-ATPase inhibition and normalized BP. In conclusion, during HS intake, the increased dopamine production via Na/K-ATPase inhibition prevents an increase in BP. During oxidative stress, D1R function is defective, and there is mild hypertension. However, in the presence of oxidative stress, HS intake causes marked elevation in BP, which results from a defective renal D1R function leading to the failure of dopamine to inhibit Na/K-ATPase and promote sodium excretion.


Key Words: dopamine • G proteins • Na/K-ATPase • L-buthionine sulfoximine • glutathione


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The mechanisms by which increased dietary sodium intake raises arterial blood pressure (BP) are not fully understood, but they seem to be related to the inability of the kidneys to excrete the excess amounts of sodium.1,2 The primary role of the kidneys in the regulation of BP was originally proposed by Guyton3 based on some elegant experiments involving the pressure-natriuresis response. The kidney has several regulatory systems involved in the control of sodium homeostasis and BP. In particular, renal dopamine plays a major natriuretic role in the complex physiological network that has evolved to maintain sodium balance and BP.2,4–6

Dopamine synthesized within the renal proximal tubules plays an important role in the regulation of renal sodium excretion.4,5 There are 5 genetically distinct dopamine receptors (D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5), which are expressed in renal proximal tubules.4,5,7–10 Activation of dopamine D1 receptors (D1Rs) results in inhibition of the Na/K-ATPase and Na/H exchanger activities in the proximal tubule, leading to an increase in sodium excretion.11 The ability of endogenous dopamine to maintain sodium homeostasis depends on the state of sodium balance.4,5,11 A regulatory action is observed under conditions of increased sodium intake. Under these conditions, the dopaminergic inhibition of sodium transport is caused by an increase in renal dopamine production.4,5,11

An altered renal D1R function is present in human and rodent genetic hypertension.12,13 There is a decreased natriuretic effect of dopamine and impaired D1R function in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive rats.12,14 Interestingly, evidence to date indicates that, in both human and animals models of hypertension, inheritable or salt induced, there is increased oxidative stress that coexists with defective D1R function.4,5,12,13,15–18 In obese Zucker rats, antioxidant supplementations decreases oxidative stress, restores D1R signaling, and lowers BP.15 Collectively, these observations suggest that oxidative stress–mediated renal D1R dysfunction could be responsible for salt-sensitive hypertension. To test this hypothesis, different groups of animals were given tap water supplemented with L-buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), sodium chloride, and BSO plus sodium chloride along with Tempol for 12 days. Oxidative markers, kidney function, D1R function, and BP were studied at the end of treatment.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
[3H]SCH23390 hydrochloride (R [+]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol hydrochloride) and [35S]GTP{gamma}S (guanosine 5'-[{gamma}-thio]triphosphate[35S]-) were purchased from NEM Life Sciences. 8-Isoprostane enzyme immunoassay kit (catalog No. 516351) and glutathione colorimetric assay kit (catalog No. GSH-420) were obtained from Cayman and OXIS Health, respectively. R (+)-SKF38393 hydrochloride (an active enantiomer of [±]-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-[1H]-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol), BSO, Tempol, Inactin, sodium pentobarbital, ouabain, and all of the other reagents were purchased from {sigma}-Aldrich.

Animal Treatment
Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (200 to 250 g) were obtained from Harlan. The animals were divided into 8 experimental groups: V, animals maintained on tap water (vehicle); HS, animals receiving high salt (1% NaCl); BSO, animals provided with 30 mmol/L of BSO; HS+BSO, animals receiving both high salt and BSO; T, animals provided with 1 mmol/L of Tempol; HS+T, animals kept on high salt and Tempol; BSO+T, animals receiving BSO and Tempol; and HS+BSO+T, animals receiving high salt, BSO, and Tempol. BSO, an oxidant; high salt; and Tempol, an antioxidant, were provided in drinking water for 12 days. All of the experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health and University of Houston guidelines and protocols for care and use of laboratory animals.

Surgical Procedures for Renal Function Studies
Rats were anesthetized with Inactin (100 mg/kg, IP), and tracheotomy was performed to facilitate breathing. To measure the BP and heart rate, the left carotid artery was catheterized with phycoerythrin-50 tubing. This tubing was connected to a Statham P23AC pressure transducer. BP and heart rate were continuously recorded on a Grass polygraph (model 7D, Grass Instrument).19

Experimental Protocol for Renal Function Studies
The effect of SKF38393 on sodium and water excretion was determined in all of the experimental groups of anesthetized rats prepared for measurement of BP and collection of urine samples from the left ureter as described previously.19 The protocol consisted of a 45-minute stabilization period after the surgery, followed by 5 consecutive 30-minute collection periods: basal 1, basal 2, drug, recovery 1, and recovery 2. During basal 1 and basal 2, saline alone was infused; during drug, SKF38393 (1 µg/kg per minute in saline) was infused; and during recovery 1 and recovery 2, only saline was infused. Urine samples were collected throughout the 30-minute periods, and 0.2 mL of blood samples (replaced by equal amount of saline) were collected at the end of each period. Plasma was separated by centrifugation of blood samples at 1500g for 15 minutes at 4°C. Sodium and potassium concentrations were measured by flame photometer 480 (Ciba Corning Diagnostics), and creatinine levels were determined by creatinine analyzer (Model 2, Beckman).

Determination of Dopamine Levels in Urine Samples
Urine samples were spiked with an internal standard epinine and extracted with alumina equilibrated with 1.5 mol/L of Tris-HCl and 1% Na2EDTA (pH 8.6). The urine-alumina mixture was centrifuged (at 10 000g, 4°C) followed by 2 washes with distilled water. Dopamine was eluted with 0.2 mL of 0.2 N perchloric acid, filtered, and injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography (Model 1525, Waters Corporation) equipped with a C18 reverse-phase, 3-µm Luna column (100 x 2 mm, Phenomenex). The sample was eluted by a mobile phase (25 mmol/L of NaH2PO4, 50 mmol/L of Na-citrate, 0.03 mmol/L of EDTA, 10 mmol/L of diethylamine HCl, 2.2 mmol/L of sodium octylsulfate [pH 3.2], 30 mL/L of methanol, and 22 mL/L of dimethylacetamide) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Dopamine peak was determined by the Coulometric electrochemical detector (Model Coulochem III, ESA, Inc). The amount of dopamine present in the urine sample was calculated from the known standard curve and corrected for sample loss because of extraction based on the recovery of the internal standard epinine.

Indices (Biomarkers) of Oxidative Stress
Renal malondialdehyde was determined by measuring the malondialdehyde level in butanol extracts of cell lysate by the method of Mihara and Uchiyama.20 8-Isoprostane and glutathione were determined by a commercially available immunoassay kit and colorimetric assay kit, respectively. As described previously,21 fluorescence spectrometric assay of O2 production was performed to determine the nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) oxidase (NAD[P]H oxidase) activity in renal proximal tubules.

Preparation of Renal Proximal Tubular Suspension
Renal proximal tubular suspension was prepared as described earlier.19,22 Briefly, rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, IP), and after a midline incision, the aorta was cannulated below the kidneys, and an in situ digestion was accomplished by perfusing an enzyme solution of collagenase and hyaluronidase. Enrichment of proximal tubules was carried out using 20% Ficoll gradient in Krebs buffer. The band at Ficoll interface was collected and washed by centrifugation at 250g for 5 minutes. Cell lysate, cytosol (35 000g supernatant), and membrane fractions (35 000g pellet) were isolated from proximal tubules by differential centrifugation, a standard method routinely used in our laboratory. Protein was determined by bicinchoninic acid method (Pierce Chemical) using BSA as a standard.

[3H]SCH23390 Binding
Fifty micrograms of membrane protein were incubated with 50 nM [3H]SCH-23390, a D1R antagonist, in 250 µL (final volume) of binding buffer for 120 minutes at 25°C. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µmol/L of unlabeled SCH-23390.16,19,23

Measurement of [35S] Guanosine-{gamma}-Thiophosphate Binding
To determine the D1R G protein-coupling, membrane were incubated with [35S] guanosine-{gamma}-thiophosphate (GTP{gamma}S) and stimulated by 1 µmol/L of SKF38393. Nonspecific [35S]GTP{gamma}S binding was determined in the presence of 100 µmol/L of unlabeled GTP{gamma}S. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between total and nonspecific binding.24

Effect of SKF38393 on Na,K-ATPase Activity
Na,K-ATPase activity was determined as reported earlier.15,19,25 Briefly, SKF38393-induced Na/K-ATPase inhibition was determined in proximal tubular suspensions (1 mg of protein per milliliter) incubated with or without 1 mmol/L of ouabain at 37°C for 15 minutes.

Statistical Analysis
Differences between means were evaluated using the unpaired t test or ANOVA with Newman-Keuls’ multiple comparison test, as appropriate; P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. For natriuretic and diuretic experiments, drug response and recovery were evaluated by repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls’ multiple test. "n" refers to the number of rats used in each group.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
As shown in Table 1, after 12 days of treatment, there were no significant differences in food intake and body weight among the experimental groups. There was a significant increase in urinary dopamine excretion in animals on high salt (HS), HS+BSO (BSO), HS+Tempol (T), and HS plus BSO and Tempol compared with vehicle. BSO or Tempol did not alter the renal dopamine production. HS intake did not affect the BP, whereas BSO-treated rats exhibited a mild increase in BP compared with vehicle. Concomitant treatment with BSO and HS caused a marked increase in BP. Treatment with Tempol normalized BP in BSO and BSO+HS rats. There was no difference in glomular filtration rate among various experimental groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. General Parameters

Oxidative Stress
Compared with vehicle, HS intake did not have any effect on oxidative or antioxidative markers. Treatment with BSO without or with HS caused marked oxidative stress as evidenced by reduced renal glutathione, increased renal malondialdehyde and serum, and urinary excretion of 8-isoprostane (Table 1). In addition, these animals showed increased activity of NAD(P)H oxidase. Treatment of BSO and BSO+HS rats with Tempol normalized the malondialdehyde and 8-isoprostane levels and NAD(P)H oxidase activity. Although Tempol caused an increase in glutathione levels of BSO and BSO+HS rats, it remained significantly lower than vehicle. There was no difference in malondialdehyde, 8-isoprostane, and glutathione levels, as well as NAD(P)H oxidase activity, among vehicle, HS, or Tempol groups (Table 1).

D1R-Mediated Diuresis and Natriuresis
HS and HS+BSO rats exhibited significant increases in basal sodium and water excretion, whereas treatment with BSO or Tempol did not affect these parameters. Administration of SKF38393 (1 µg/kg per minute) caused significant increases in fractional excretion of sodium and urinary sodium excretion rate in V and HS rats, but failed to produce such an effect in BSO and HS+BSO rats (Figures 1 and 2Down). However, urine flow was increased to a similar extent in all groups of rats (Figure 3). Treatment with Tempol restored SKF-38393–induced natriuresis in BSO and HS+BSO treated animals. No changes in BP or heart rate were observed during SKF38393 infusion (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) before, during, and after 1 µg/kg per minute of SKF38393 in A. Basal indicates values before drug administration; Drug, values during drug administration; Recovery, values after drug infusion was terminated. All of the time intervals (basal, drug, and recovery) were 30 minutes. Two basal and 2 recovery collections were averaged and shown. A, *P<0.05 vs basal V; #P<0.05 vs basal BSO (1-way ANOVA); $P<0.05 drug vs respective basal; {Psi}P<0.05 drug vs respective recovery (repeated-measures ANOVA). B, *P<0.05 vs basal T; #P<0.05 vs basal BSO+T (1-way ANOVA); $P<0.05 drug vs respective basal; {Psi}P<0.05 drug vs respective recovery (repeated-measures ANOVA). Both 1-way and repeated-measures ANOVAs were followed by posthoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant (n=8 animals).


Figure 2
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Urinary sodium excretion rate (UNaV) before, during, and after 1 µg/kg per minute of SKF38393 in A. Basal indicates values before drug administration; Drug, values during drug administration; Recovery, values after drug infusion was terminated. All of the time intervals (basal, drug, and recovery) were 30 minutes. Two basal and 2 recovery collections were averaged and shown. A, *P<0.05 vs basal V; #P<0.05 vs basal BSO (1-way ANOVA); $P<0.05 drug vs respective basal; {Psi}P<0.05 drug vs respective recovery (repeated-measures ANOVA). B, *P<0.05 vs basal T; #P<0.05 vs basal BSO+T (1-way ANOVA); $P<0.05 drug vs respective basal; {Psi}P<0.05 drug vs respective recovery (repeated-measures ANOVA). Both 1-way and repeated-measures ANOVAs were followed by posthoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant (n=8 animals).


Figure 3
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Urine flow before, during, and after 1 µg/kg per minute of SKF38393 in A. Basal indicates values before drug administration; Drug, values during drug administration; Recovery, values after drug infusion was terminated. All of the time intervals (basal, drug, and recovery) were 30 minutes. Two basal and 2 recovery collections were averaged and shown. A, *P<0.05 vs basal V; #P<0.05 vs basal BSO (1-way ANOVA); $P<0.05 drug vs respective basal; {Psi}P<0.05 drug vs respective recovery (repeated-measure ANOVA). B, *P<0.05 vs basal T; #P<0.05 vs basal BSO+T (1-way ANOVA); $P<0.05 drug vs respective basal; {Psi}P<0.05 drug vs respective recovery (repeated-measures ANOVA). Both 1-way and repeated-measures ANOVAs were followed by posthoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant (n=8 animals).

D1R Expression in Renal Proximal Tubular Membranes
The specific membrane binding of [3H]SCH23390, a D1R antagonist, was significantly reduced in proximal tubules from BSO- and HS+BSO-treated rats. Compared with vehicle, high salt did not produce any effect on ligand binding (Figure 4). Treatment of BSO and HS+BSO rats with Tempol restored D1R expression. Similar D1R binding was observed in V, HS, T, and HS+T animal groups (Figure 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. [3H]SCH23390 binding in renal proximal tubular membranes. *P<0.05 vs V; #P<0.05 vs BSO; and $P<0.05 vs HS+BSO (1-way ANOVA followed by posthoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant (n=8 animals).

SKF38393-Induced D1R G Protein Coupling in Renal Proximal Tubular Membranes
SKF-38393 elicited D1R G protein coupling as evidenced by increased [35S]GTP{gamma}S binding in proximal tubular membranes from V and HS rats (Figure 5). However, SKF38393 failed to stimulate [35S]GTP{gamma}S membrane binding in proximal tubules from BSO- and HS+BSO-treated rats (Figure 5). Treatment of BSO- and HS+BSO-supplemented animals with Tempol restored the D1R G protein coupling (Figure 5). The basal [35S]GTP{gamma}S binding (pmol/mg protein) was similar in all of the animal groups (V, 4.3±0.4; BSO, 3.9±0.5; HS, 4.1±0.3; HS+BSO, 4.7±0.6; T, 4.0±0.3; BSO+T, 5.1±0.6; HS+T, 4.8±0.5; and BSO+HS+T, 4.8±0.6).


Figure 5
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. SKF38393-induced [35S]GTP{gamma}S binding in renal proximal tubular membranes. *P<0.05 vs V; #P<0.05 vs BSO; and $P<0.05 vs HS+BSO (1-way ANOVA followed by posthoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant (n=8 animals).

SKF38393-Induced Adenylyl Cyclase Activation in Renal Proximal Tubules
Incubation of proximal tubular membranes from V and HS animals with SKF38393 caused a significant increase in cAMP accumulation. However, SKF-38393 failed to increase cAMP levels in membranes from BSO- and HS+BSO-treated rats. Tempol treatment restored the SKF38393-induced adenylyl cyclase activation in these animals. Basal cAMP levels and forskolin, a direct activator of adenylyl cyclase-induced cAMP accumulation, were similar in all of the experimental groups (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. SKF38393 (100 µm) and Forskolin (10 µmol/L)-Induced Adenylyl Cyclase Activation

SKF38393-Induced Na/K-ATPase Inhibition in Renal Proximal Tubular Membranes
In an effort to investigate the effect of endogenous dopamine on Na/K pump, we first determined the basal Na/K-ATPase activity in renal proximal tubules. As shown in Figure 6A, the basal Na/K-ATPase activity was significantly lower in HS-treated rats compared with vehicle. On the other hand, in animals treated with BSO or BSO+HS, there was no decrease basal Na/K-ATPase activity. Tempol supplementation resulted in a decrease of basal Na/K-ATPase activity in animals given HS plus BSO (Figure 6A). However, Tempol did not affect the basal Na/K-ATPase activity in vehicle, BSO, or HS rats (Figure 6A).


Figure 6
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Basal (A) and 1 µmol/L of SKF38393-induced inhibition of Na,K-ATPase activity (B and C) in renal proximal tubules. A: *P<0.05 vs V; #P<0.05 vs HS; $P<0.05 vs HS+T; and {Psi}P<0.05 vs HS+BSO+T (1-way ANOVA followed by posthoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test). B, §P<0.05 vs other basal values. C, §§P<0.05 vs T and BSO+T basal values. B and C, **P<0.05 SKF38393 vs respective basal (Student’s t test). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant (n=8 animals).

Because increased dopamine production failed to decrease basal Na/K-ATPase activity in HS+BSO rats, it may reflect the failure of D1R activation to inhibit Na/K-ATPase activity in renal proximal tubules. Therefore, we incubated proximal tubules with D1R agonist SKF38393 and determined the Na/K-ATPase activity. Interestingly, in V and HS rats, the incubation of proximal tubules with SKF38393 caused significant inhibition of Na/K-ATPase activity (Figure 6B). However, SKF38393 failed to inhibit Na/K-ATPase activity in proximal tubules from BSO-and HS+BSO-treated animals (Figure 6B). Treatment of these animals with Tempol restored the SKF-38393-induced Na/K-ATPase Inhibition (Figure 6C).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our results show that in normotensive SD rats HS intake increased urinary dopamine production and sodium excretion and decreased basal renal proximal tubular Na/K-ATPase activity. HS did not affect BP or the ability of SKF-38393, the D1R agonist, to inhibit Na/K-ATPase and promote sodium excretion. Treatment of SD rats with BSO, an inhibitor of [35S]GTP{gamma}S, a key enzyme in glutathione biosynthesis, reduced renal glutathione levels and increased oxidative stress, which was accompanied by D1R downregulation and uncoupling from G protein. There was no change in renal dopamine production, these animals exhibited mild increases in BP, and SKF-38393 failed to stimulate proximal tubular adenylyl cyclase, inhibit Na,K-ATPase activity, or promote sodium excretion. On the other hand, cosupplementation of BSO with HS caused a marked increase in BP along with increased oxidative stress and defective D1R function, despite increased renal dopamine production. Tempol supplementation of BSO and BSO+HS rats reduced oxidative stress, restored D1R function, and normalized BP. These results demonstrate the importance of dopamine as a natriuretic hormone in that it inhibits sodium transporters, increases sodium excretion, and contributes to maintenance of BP during HS intake. More importantly, these data also identify the role of oxidative stress in causing renal D1R defects and provide an unequivocal support to the significance of D1R dysfunction in contributing to salt-sensitive hypertension in the presence of oxidative stress.

HS Intake and BP
Several lines of evidence suggest that intrarenally formed dopamine plays a role in the regulation of sodium excretion and that this effect is, at least in part, mediated by a direct action of the hormone on proximal tubule sodium reabsorption.4–6,11–13 Dopamine, via activation of D1R, exerts its effect on sodium reabsorption by inhibiting proximal tubule Na/K-ATPase activity.4–6,11–13 To study the physiological relevance of these findings, the present study evaluated the role of the renal dopamine system in regulating sodium balance and BP during increased dietary sodium intake. Our findings demonstrate that change in sodium intake regulates both renal dopamine formation and the dopamine-induced inhibition of Na/K-ATPase in renal proximal tubules. We observed that in SD rats, HS intake increased urinary dopamine excretion, generally considered to reflect intrarenal dopamine production. The increased dopamine formation was accompanied by increased sodium excretion and decreased Na/K-ATPase activity. In addition, the exogenous D1R agonist also inhibited Na/K-ATPase activity, leading to an increase in sodium excretion. Taken together, the results imply that HS intake increases renal dopamine formation, which inhibits proximal tubular Na/K-ATPase activity and promotes sodium excretion. This effect contributes to increased sodium excretion and maintenance of normal BP during a HS diet. Several previous reports support this view. In healthy individuals, changes in urinary dopamine excretion parallel the changes in urinary sodium excretion during acute and chronic variations in salt intake, and blockade of dopamine formation reduces both urinary dopamine and sodium excretion during HS intake.26–28 Also, blockade of the dopamine receptors or inhibition of renal dopamine formation attenuated the natriuretic effect of acute saline infusion and HS intake in dogs and rats.29–32 Furthermore, in rats given an HS diet, Na/K-ATPase activity is inhibited by locally formed dopamine.29,33,34

Oxidative Stress and BP
Recent studies have indicated that both hypertensive humans and animals have decreased antioxidant capacity and produce excessive amounts of ROS.16,17,35–40 Although renal D1R dysfunction has been reported under this condition, it remained to be determined whether defective renal D1R function serves as a link between oxidative stress and hypertension. In present study, we administered BSO to compromise the antioxidant system of healthy SD rats by reducing glutathione content, a pivotal endogenous antioxidant, which led to increased oxidative stress. These animals exhibiting oxidative stress showed decreased D1R function as evidenced by failure of SKF-38393 to inhibit Na/K-ATPase activity and promote sodium excretion. Interestingly, the defect in D1R function was accompanied by a mild increase in BP. There are reports suggesting that oxidative stress may be important in the pathogenesis of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats.16–18 Increased oxidative stress and elevated lipid peroxidation are reported to cause impairment of D1R function in renal proximal tubules of spontaneously hypertensive rats.18 Our own studies suggest that increased BP in obese Zucker rats may be attributed to oxidative stress–mediated D1R dysfunction.15,21 Finally, supplementation of BSO-treated rats with Tempol decreased oxidative stress, restored the D1R function, and normalized BP, indicating the role of D1R dysfunction in the mild elevation of BP associated with oxidative stress.

Oxidative Stress, HS Intake, and BP
The novel observation of this study was that oxidative stress–induced renal D1R dysfunction contributes to salt-sensitive hypertension in SD rats. HS intake alone for the same amount of time did not result in increased BP when renal D1R function was normal, thus suggesting a role of D1R in salt sensitivity. Abnormalities in the renal dopaminergic system, in view of its potential natriuretic actions, have been suggested to contribute to the development of salt-sensitive hypertension.12,14,41,42 Several lines of evidence indicate that hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats results from the inability to excrete sodium adequately in response to salt challenge.12,14,41,42 Reports also suggest that the ability of the D1 agonist fenoldopam to decrease renal proximal sodium transport is reduced in salt-sensitive hypertensive humans compared with salt-resistant hypertensive or control normotensive subjects.4,5,12,13 There also exists in vivo evidence for a defective renal dopamine D1R function in prohypertensive DS rats.42,43 In the present study we found that, in BSO+HS-treated rats, the endogenous dopamine failed to inhibit Na/K-ATPase activity. The lack of Na/K-ATPase inhibition in these animals cannot be attributed to the failure of renal tubules to increase dopamine levels in response to HS intake, because similar levels of dopamine were observed in normotensive HS rats and hypertensive BSO+HS animals. Therefore, it is possible that oxidative stress–induced D1R dysfunction was responsible for the inability of dopamine to inhibit Na/K-ATPase. This is further supported by the observation that the exogenous D1R agonist SKF38393 failed to inhibit Na/K-ATPase and promote natriuresis. Finally, treatment of BSO and HS rats with Tempol reduced oxidative stress and normalized BP. Similar to HS rats, these animals showed decreased basal Na/K-ATPase activity and exhibited normal responsiveness to D1R agonists, providing strong evidence that renal D1 dysfunction contributes to salt-sensitive hypertension.

We found that oxidative stress caused a similar defect in D1R function in BSO- and BSO-HS-treated rats, yet the later group exhibited a marked increase in BP, whereas the former showed a mild increase. However, it is noteworthy that the natriuretic effect of dopamine is prominent only after salt loading and small or negligible during normal salt intake or salt depletion.4,5,11–13 Under conditions of moderate sodium excess, locally generated dopamine via D1R acts on renal tubules and decreases sodium transport.4–6,11–13,29,33,34 Under these circumstances renal D1R is responsible for >50% of incremental sodium excretion.4–6,11–13 In addition, although kidneys play a primary role in sodium homeostasis, the extrarenal effects can also contribute to salt sensitivity. Vaziri and colleagues44,45 have shown that chronic consumption of HS or BSO could independently cause the downregulation of various NO synthase isoforms, as well as reduction in NO bioavailability, which contributes to the development and maintenance of hypertension in animals. Studies from our laboratory also showed that, during oxidative stress, HS intake attenuated the vasodepressor responses to endothelial-dependent and -independent vasoactive compounds despite NO synthase upregulation.46 Taken together, these data show that the increased salt sensitivity in conditions associated with oxidative stress may be contributed by both renal and extrarenal signaling molecules responsible for sodium homeostasis and vascular tone.

Oxidative Stress and D1R Dysfunction
In an effort to understand the mechanisms responsible for oxidative stress–mediated D1R dysfunction, we studied the D1R expression and coupling to G protein. We observed that oxidative stress decreased D1R expression, and SKF-38393 failed to stimulate G protein coupling and increase cAMP accumulation, suggesting uncoupling from effector complex. The functional consequence of D1R downregulation and uncoupling was blunting of SKF38393-induced Na/K-ATPase inhibition in renal proximal tubules and subsequent failure of the D1R agonist to cause an increase in sodium excretion. Treatment of these animals with Tempol restored D1R expression and coupling. These results are in agreement with our previous studies showing that, in aging and diabetes, oxidative stress contributes to D1R dysfunction, as antioxidant Tempol ameliorated the oxidative stress and restored D1R function. Similar to our findings, defective coupling of the D1R is reported in spontaneously hypertensive rats and DS rats: D1-like receptor agonists were unable to stimulate adenylyl cyclase in proximal tubules of kidneys from DS rats, whereas forskolin, a direct adenylyl cyclase activator, stimulated the enzyme in both DS and DR rats.12,42,47 Although the detailed mechanism responsible for BSO-induced D1R G protein uncoupling was not studied, in a recent study we have reported that exposure of renal epithelial cells to H2O2, an oxidant, increased protein kinase C activity, translocated GRK-2 to the cell membrane, and increased basal D1R serine phosphorylation, resulting in uncoupling of D1R from G proteins.48 Therefore, we can speculate that BSO-induced oxidative stress, via increased protein kinase C activity, may cause D1R hyperphosphorylation, leading to receptor G protein uncoupling.

In conclusion, we found that animals with functional renal D1R maintain sodium homeostasis by increasing renal dopamine formation and inhibiting Na/K-ATPase activity during HS intake. Oxidative stress causes D1R dysfunction and a mild increase in BP. In conditions associated with oxidative stress, the increased HS intake results in development of hypertension. Antioxidant Tempol decreases oxidative stress, restores D1R function, and mitigates salt sensitivity, providing support for the role of renal D1R in salt-sensitive hypertension during oxidative stress.

Perspectives
Our findings identify a role for endogenous renal dopamine in maintaining sodium homeostasis and BP during increases in sodium intake under normal physiological condition. More importantly, they demonstrate that a small perturbance in the system, such as an increase in oxidative stress, causes renal dopamine receptor dysfunction, but the BP increase is modest. However, in conditions associated with oxidative plus HS intake, a phenomenon observed in various pathological situations, the compromise in renal dopamine receptor function contributes to hypertension. Therefore, lowering oxidative stress and/or salt intake will be beneficial in protecting against salt-induced hypertension.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We are thankful to Dr Ran Xu for performing high-performance liquid chromatography.

Source of Funding

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grant AG-25056 from the National Institute of Aging.

Disclosures

None.

Received October 1, 2007; first decision October 16, 2007; accepted November 20, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Adamczak M, Zeier M, Dikow R, Ritz E. Kidney and hypertension. Kidney Int. 2002; 80 (suppl): 62–67.

2. Meneton P, Jeunemaitre X, de Wardener HE, MacGregor GA. Links between dietary salt intake, renal salt handling, blood pressure, and cardiovascular diseases. Physiol Rev. 2005; 85: 679–715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Guyton AC. Blood pressure control–special role of the kidneys and body fluids. Science. 1991; 252: 1813–1816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Jose PA, Eisner GM, Felder RA. Renal dopamine and sodium homeostasis. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000; 2: 174–183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Jose PA, Eisner GM, Felder RA. Regulation of blood pressure by dopamine receptors. Nephron Physiol. 2003; 95: 19–27.[CrossRef]

6. Pedemonte CH, Efendiev R, Bertorello AM. Inhibition of Na,K-ATPase by dopamine in proximal tubule epithelial cells. Semin Nephrol. 2005; 25: 322–327.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Nurnberger A, Rabiger M, Mack A, Diaz J, Sokoloff P, Muhlbauer B, Luippold G. Subapical localization of the dopamine D3 receptor in proximal tubules of the rat kidney. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004; 52: 1647–1655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. O’Connell DP, Vaughan CJ, Aherne AM, Botkin SJ, Wang ZQ, Felder RA, Carey RM. Expression of the dopamine D3 receptor protein in the rat kidney. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 886–895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Pedrosa R, Gomes P, Hopfer U, Jose PA, Soares-da-Silva P. Gialpha3 protein-coupled dopamine D3 receptor-mediated inhibition of renal NHE3 activity in SHR proximal tubular cells is a PLC-PKC-mediated event. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004; 287: F1059–F1066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Ricci A, Marchal-Victorion S, Bronzetti E, Parini A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK. Dopamine D4 receptor expression in rat kidney: evidence for pre- and postjunctional localization. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002; 50: 1091–1096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Aperia AC. Intrarenal dopamine: a key signal in the interactive regulation of sodium metabolism. Annu Rev Physiol. 2000; 62: 621–647.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Jose PA, Eisner GM, Felder RA. Renal dopamine receptors in health and hypertension. Pharmacol Ther. 1998; 80: 149–182.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Zeng C, Eisner GM, Felder RA, Jose PA. Dopamine receptor and hypertension. Curr Med Chem Cardiovasc Hematol Agents. 2005; 3: 69–77.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Nishi A, Eklof AC, Bertorello AM, Aperia A. Dopamine regulation of renal Na+,K(+)-ATPase activity is lacking in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 767–771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Banday AA, Marwaha A, Tallam LS, Lokhandwala MF. Tempol reduces oxidative stress, improves insulin sensitivity, decreases renal dopamine D1 receptor hyperphosphorylation, and restores D1 receptor-G-protein coupling and function in obese Zucker rats. Diabetes. 2005; 54: 2219–2226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Manning RD Jr, Meng S, Tian N. Renal and vascular oxidative stress and salt-sensitivity of arterial pressure. Acta Physiol Scand. 2003; 179: 243–250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Manning RD Jr, Tian N, Meng S. Oxidative stress and antioxidant treatment in hypertension and the associated renal damage. Am J Nephrol. 2005; 25: 311–317.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. White BH, Sidhu A. Increased oxidative stress in renal proximal tubules of the spontaneously hypertensive rat: a mechanism for defective dopamine D1A receptor/G-protein coupling. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 1659–1665.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Marwaha A, Banday AA, Lokhandwala MF. Reduced renal dopamine D1 receptor function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004; 286: F451–F457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Mihara M, Uchiyama M. Determination of malonaldehyde precursor in tissues by thiobarbituric acid test. Anal Biochem. 1978; 86: 271–278.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Banday AA, Fazili FR, Marwaha A, Lokhandwala MF. Mitogen-activated protein kinase upregulation reduces renal D1 receptor affinity and G-protein coupling in obese rats. Kidney Int. 2007; 71: 397–406.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Chen C, Beach RE, Lokhandwala MF. Dopamine fails to inhibit renal tubular sodium pump in hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1993; 21: 364–372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Kansra V, Hussain T, Lokhandwala MF. Alterations in dopamine DA1 receptor and G proteins in renal proximal tubules of old rats. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: F53–F59.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Hussain T, Lokhandwala MF. Renal dopamine DA1 receptor coupling with G(S) and G(q/11) proteins in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: F339–F346.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Quigley JP, Gotterer GS. Distribution of (Na+-K+)-stimulated ATPase activity in rat intestinal mucosa. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969; 173: 456–468.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Alexander RW, Gill JR Jr, Yamabe H, Lovenberg W, Keiser HR. Effects of dietary sodium and of acute saline infusion on the interrelationship between dopamine excretion and adrenergic activity in man. J Clin Invest. 1974; 54: 194–200.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Ball SG, Lee MR. The effect of carbidopa administration on urinary sodium excretion in man. Is dopamine an intrarenal natriuretic hormone? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1977; 4: 115–119.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Stephenson RK, Sole MJ, Baines AD. Neural and extraneural catecholamine production by rat kidneys. Am J Physiol. 1982; 242: F261–F266.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Bertorello A, Hokfelt T, Goldstein M, Aperia A. Proximal tubule Na+-K+-ATPase activity is inhibited during high-salt diet: evidence for DA-mediated effect. Am J Physiol. 1988; 254: F795–F801.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Krishna GG, Danovitch GM, Beck FW, Sowers JR. Dopaminergic mediation of the natriuretic response to volume expansion. J Lab Clin Med. 1985; 105: 214–218.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Pelayo JC, Fildes RD, Eisner GM, Jose PA. Effects of dopamine blockade on renal sodium excretion. Am J Physiol. 1983; 245: F247–F253.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Sowers JR, Crane PD, Beck FW, McClanahan M, King ME, Mohanty PK. Relationship between urinary dopamine production and natriuresis after acute intravascular volume expansion with sodium chloride in dogs. Endocrinology. 1984; 115: 2085–2090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Seri I, Kone BC, Gullans SR, Aperia A, Brenner BM, Ballermann BJ. Locally formed dopamine inhibits Na+-K+-ATPase activity in rat renal cortical tubule cells. Am J Physiol. 1988; 255: F666–673.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Seri I, Kone BC, Gullans SR, Aperia A, Brenner BM, Ballermann BJ. Influence of Na+ intake on dopamine-induced inhibition of renal cortical Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase. Am J Physiol. 1990; 258: F52–F60.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Ceriello A, Giugliano D, Quatraro A, Lefebvre PJ. Anti-oxidants show an anti-hypertensive effect in diabetic and hypertensive subjects. Clin Sci (Lond). 1991; 81: 739–742.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Galley HF, Thornton J, Howdle PD, Walker BE, Webster NR. Combination oral antioxidant supplementation reduces blood pressure. Clin Sci (Lond). 1997; 92: 361–365.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Lacy F, O’Connor DT, Schmid-Schonbein GW. Plasma hydrogen peroxide production in hypertensives and normotensive subjects at genetic risk of hypertension. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 291–303.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Meng S, Cason GW, Gannon AW, Racusen LC, Manning RD Jr. Oxidative stress in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 1346–1352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Prabha PS, Das UN, Koratkar R, Sagar PS, Ramesh G. Free radical generation, lipid peroxidation and essential fatty acids in uncontrolled essential hypertension. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1990; 41: 27–33.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Russo C, Olivieri O, Girelli D, Faccini G, Zenari ML, Lombardi S, Corrocher R. Anti-oxidant status and lipid peroxidation in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 1267–1271.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Luippold G, Zimmermann C, Mai M, Kloor D, Starck D, Gross G, Muhlbauer B. Dopamine D(3) receptors and salt-dependent hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12: 2272–2279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Ohbu K, Kaskel FJ, Kinoshita S, Felder RA. Dopamine-1 receptors in the proximal convoluted tubule of Dahl rats: defective coupling to adenylate cyclase. Am J Physiol. 1995; 268: R231–R235.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Hansell P. In vivo evidence for a defect in the dopamine DA1 receptor in the prehypertensive Dahl salt-sensitive rat. Exp Nephrol. 1995; 3: 15–22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Ni Z, Vaziri ND. Effect of salt loading on nitric oxide synthase expression in normotensive rats. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14: 155–163.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Vaziri ND, Wang XQ, Oveisi F, Rad B. Induction of oxidative stress by glutathione depletion causes severe hypertension in normal rats. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 142–146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Banday AA, Muhammad AB, Fazili FR, Lokhandwala M. Mechanisms of oxidative stress-induced increase in salt sensitivity and development of hypertension in Sprague-Dawley rats. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 664–671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Sela S, White BH, Uh M, Kimura K, Patel S, Sidhu A. Dysfunctional D1A receptor-G-protein coupling in proximal tubules of spontaneously hypertensive rats is not due to abnormal G-proteins. J Hypertens. 1997; 15: 259–267.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Asghar M, Banday AA, Fardoun RZ, Lokhandwala MF. Hydrogen peroxide causes uncoupling of dopamine D1-like receptors from G proteins via a mechanism involving protein kinase C and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006; 40: 13–20.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
C. S. Escano, I. Armando, X. Wang, L. D. Asico, A. Pascua, Y. Yang, Z. Wang, Y.-S. Lau, and P. A. Jose
Renal dopaminergic defect in C57Bl/6J mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2009; 297(6): R1660 - R1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. Asghar, G. Chugh, and M. F. Lokhandwala
Inflammation compromises renal dopamine D1 receptor function in rats
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2009; 297(6): F1543 - F1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
L. George, M. F. Lokhandwala, and M. Asghar
Exercise activates redox-sensitive transcription factors and restores renal D1 receptor function in old rats
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): F1174 - F1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
B. Yao, R. C. Harris, and M.-Z. Zhang
Intrarenal Dopamine Attenuates Deoxycorticosterone Acetate/High Salt-Induced Blood Pressure Elevation in Part Through Activation of a Medullary Cyclooxygenase 2 Pathway
Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 1077 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
A. A. Banday and M. F. Lokhandwala
Oxidative stress-induced renal angiotensin AT1 receptor upregulation causes increased stimulation of sodium transporters and hypertension
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): F698 - F706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/2/367    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.102111v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banday, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lokhandwala, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banday, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lokhandwala, M. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension