| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:1163.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Go Red Original Articles |
From the Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Correspondence to Jong-Won Ha, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, Korea 120-752. E-mail jwha{at}yuhs.ac
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: gender arterial elastance index exercise hypertension heart failure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
moderate severity), significant coronary artery disease, prior history of myocardial infarction, depressed LV systolic function (ejection fraction <50%, or any regional wall motion abnormality), pericardial disease, and inability to exercise. Subjects were divided into 2 groups according to gender. Study approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University College of Medicine.
Two-Dimensional and Exercise Doppler Echocardiography (Diastolic Stress Echocardiography)
Standard 2-dimensional measurements (LV diastolic and systolic dimensions, ventricular septum and posterior wall thickness [PWT], left atrial volume, and LV outflow tract diameter) were obtained with the patient in the left lateral position. LV ejection fraction (EF) was calculated by the modified Quinones method.6 After obtaining rest images from standard parasternal and apical views, a multistage supine bicycle exercise test was performed with a variable load bicycle ergometer (Medical Positioning Inc) as described previously.7 Patients pedaled at a constant speed beginning at a workload of 25 W in increments of 25 W every 3 minute.Echocardiography was performed using a GE Vingmed System 7 ultrasound system with a 2.5-MHz transducer during rest, each stage of exercise, and recovery. The blood pressure was measured at the end of each stage of exercise on the left arm using an oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device (Solar 8000 mol/L patient monitoring device, GE Medical systems).
From the apical window, a 1- to 2-mm pulsed Doppler sample volume was placed at the mitral valve tip and mitral flow velocities from 5 to 10 cardiac cycles were recorded. Mitral inflow velocities were traced and the following variables were obtained: peak velocity of early (E) and late (A) filling, and deceleration time of E-wave velocity. SV was measured from LV outflow tract diameter and pulse–wave Doppler signal as previously described.8 Mitral annular velocity was measured by Doppler tissue imaging using pulse-wave Doppler mode. The filter was set to exclude high frequency signal, and the Nyquist limit was adjusted to a range of 15 to 20 cm/s. Gain and sample volume were minimized to allow for a clear tissue signal with minimal background noise. Early diastolic (E') and systolic (S') velocities of the mitral annulus were measured from the apical 4-chamber view with a 2- to 5-mm sample volume placed at the septal corner of the mitral annulus. Effective arterial elastance (Ea) was estimated as ESP/SV. End-systolic pressure (ESP) was estimated as systolic pressure x0.9 as described previously.9,10 The arterial elastance index (EaI) was estimated by normalizing the arterial elastance to body surface area as described previously.9,11 These measurements were performed at baseline, each stage of exercise, and recovery in the same sequence. All data were stored digitally, and measurements were taken at the completion of each study. Two-dimensional echocardiographic images from apical views at rest and during exercise were acquired, digitized, recorded, and analyzed for the wall motion analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were summarized as a mean±SD. Categorical variables were summarized as a percentage of the group total. Unpaired Student t test and
2 analysis were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Independent predictors for exercise duration were determined using multiple linear regression analysis. Four models entering arterial elastance index at baseline and each stage of exercise into the equation were assessed. Variables that showed significant association with exercise duration (age, gender, E/E' at baseline, S' at baseline, presence of diabetes, and left ventricular mass index [LVMI]) were entered into the equation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 statistical program (SPSS Inc). Statistical significance was defined as <0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Baseline Echocardiographic Findings
Table 1 shows the comparison of echocardiographic findings between the 2 groups. Women had smaller LV cavity and LVMI compared to men. However, there was no significant gender difference in the proportion of subjects with LV hypertrophy, left atrial volume index, E velocity, A velocity, E/A ratio, and DT.
Hemodynamic Response to Exercise
The effect of supine bicycle exercise on heart rate and blood pressure is shown in Table 2. In both groups, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were increased after exercise compared to those at rest. There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure at rest or during exercise up to 75 W. However, peak systolic BP at peak exercise was significantly higher in males, most likely because of the higher maximal workload that was achieved in men (Table 2). Heart rate during exercise was significantly higher at 25 W, 50 W, and 75 W of exercise in females. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in females at baseline, 25 W, and peak exercise.
|
The comparison of Doppler echocardiographic variables during exercise demonstrated significantly higher E velocity and A velocity at 25 W and 50 W of exercise in females. E' was also significantly lower at 25 W in females. E/E', an index of LV filling pressure, was significantly elevated at rest, 25 W, and 50 W of exercise in females. S', an index of LV longitudinal contraction, was significantly decreased at rest and during all stages of exercise in females (Table 3).
|
EaI at Rest and Exercise
In females, SV was significantly lower than males at baseline and up to 75 W of exercise (Table 3). Despite lower EaI at rest, the increase of EaI during exercise was steeper in females (Figure 1) with the magnitude of change in EaI at 75 W of exercise being significantly higher in females compared to males (0.69±0.83 versus 0.43±0.69, P=0.018; Figure 2).
|
|
Arterial Elastance and Exercise Capacity
Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the independent association of exercise duration with arterial elastance index while controlling for confounding factors such as age, female gender, diabetes, E/E' at baseline, S' at baseline, and LV mass index. The results demonstrated an independent association of arterial elastance index at each stage of exercise with exercise duration in hypertensive subjects (Table 4).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gender Difference of EaI
After the onset of established clinical diseases, compensatory response differs between males and females. Previous investigations have shown higher rates of HF in females despite higher EF than males after myocardial infarction.12,13 Females with HF tended to experience more symptoms and a higher number of hospitalizations than among males.14 In addition, exercise intolerance and HF with preserved EF are more common in females; however, little is known about the mechanism underlying the gender difference in risk of HF in patients with hypertension. EaI is an index of pulsatile arterial load that correlates well with aortic impedance data as described previously.9,11 Although EaI is determined by both systemic vascular resistance and pulsatile arterial load, the main determinant during exercise has been demonstrated to be systemic arterial compliance, which is increased during exercise.15,16 Because age-adjusted EaI has been described to be higher in females compared to males, we hypothesized that there would be a greater increase of EaI during exercise in females, which may be a contributing factor for the gender difference in the prevalence of diastolic heart failure.6 Females have been shown to demonstrate a greater age-related increase in proximal aortic stiffness and pulse pressure compared to males.15,17 Arterial elastance at each stage of exercise was significantly higher in females, and the difference was driven by the fact that end systolic pressure at each stage of exercise was similar despite the significantly lower SV. This may be attributable to the lower arterial compliance in females compared to males. When arterial elastance was corrected for BSA to adjust for gender difference in body size, there was no significant gender difference for EaI at each stage of exercise because of the fact that SV corrected for BSA was higher in females compared to males at baseline, 25 W, and 50 W of exercise. However, the magnitude of increase of SV index at each stage of exercise was decreased in females despite similar levels of end systolic pressure. This was associated with the magnitude of increase of arterial elastance being steeper in females with the change in EaI at 75 W of exercise being significantly higher in females compared to males (0.69±0.83 versus 0.43±0.69, P=0.018; Figure 2). Because the main determinant of EaI during exercise is arterial compliance, the steeper rise of EaI during exercise may be attributable to gender difference in inherent arterial elasticity even when corrected for the discrepancy in body size. The steeper rise of arterial elastance may subsequently increase systolic pulsatile load to the heart and have a deleterious effect on myocardial function during exercise.
Association Between EaI and Exercise
We performed a multiple linear regression analysis to determine the relationship of EaI at each stage of exercise with exercise duration controlled for age, gender, presence of diabetes, E/E' at baseline, S' at baseline, and LVMI. The result demonstrated an independent association of EaI at each stage of exercise but not at baseline. This suggests that the increase in pusatile load, which is the determinant of EaI during exercise, may have an important role in determining exercise capacity. A recent study by Borlaug et al demonstrated the importance of pulsatile arterial afterload on cardiac function during exercise.18 In this study, there was a significant correlation of the magnitude of change of EaI at 75 W of exercise with E/E' at 50 W and S prime at peak exercise (Table 5), demonstrating that the increased pulsatile arterial load during exercise may have significant impact on myocardial relaxation and contractile function during exercise and have a significant impact on exercise capacity.
|
In conclusion, despite lower EaI at rest, the increase in EaI during exercise was steeper in females with hypertension, suggesting a gender-related difference in dynamic arterial stiffness. EaI at rest as well as during exercise was significantly associated with exercise duration in patients with hypertension. Further studies to determine whether the steeper rise of EaI during exercise in females is associated with increased development of diastolic dysfunction and congestive heart failure are needed.
Study Limitations
The limitation of this study may be the relatively high proportion of treated hypertensive subjects at the time of enrollment; however, we believe that the effects of treatment were minimized by the similar proportion of treated patients and by the absence of significant differences in baseline systolic blood pressure between females and males. The second limitation is the use of brachial arterial pressure rather than the central aortic pressure measurements in determining the arterial elastance index. Because the heart rate at 75 W of exercise in females was significantly higher than that of males, the difference in heart rate and its effect on pressure amplification may impact the actual measurement of central aortic pressure during exercise. However, noninvasive calculation of end systolic pressure derived from brachial artery pressure has been shown to accurately predict end systolic pressure derived from direct measurement of central aortic pressure.10,11 In addition, because the mean age of study population of the present study is relatively old, we believe that there would be a less effect of pressure amplification from the central to the peripheral arteries. In a study by Wilkinson IB et al, older subjects over the age of 50 showed significant decrease in pressure amplification compared to younger subjects.19 Although it would be ideal to match heart rate and measure central blood pressure during exercise, it may not be practical to do in a large number of study subjects.
Perspectives
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients and is more prevalent in females. The main pathogenesis of heart failure with normal ejection fraction is explained by diastolic dysfunction. The increased diastolic dysfunction with aging is explained by steeper increase of arterial elastance (EaI) and LV end-systolic elastance (Ees) with age. Although the vascular-ventricular coupling is maintained despite steeper increase in arterial elastance because of the compensatory increase in LV elastance, the increase in LV elastance may increase the sensitivity of systolic pressure to changes in volume status, which may be exaggerated during exercise. However, the mechanism underlying the gender difference for the risk of heart failure in patients with hypertension has not been well defined. This study demonstrated that in hypertensive females, there was a steeper rise of EaI during exercise and EaI was an independent determinant of exercise duration. Because EaI during exercise is determined by the pulsatile arterial load, the steeper increase has a significant impact on myocardial relaxation and contractile function during exercise, which may result in decreased exercise capacity. The dynamic increase of arterial elastance, resulting in increase of dynamic pulsatile load during exercise, may be one of the mechanisms for the gender difference in the incidence of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure in hypertension.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) and a grant from the Korean government (M10642120001-06N4212-00110).
Disclosures
None.
Received December 1, 2007; first decision December 19, 2007; accepted January 9, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ceia F, Fonseca C, Mota T, Morais H, Matias F, de Sousa A, Oliveira A, Eio O. Prevalence of chronic heart failure in Southwestern Europe: the EPICA study. Eur J Heart Failure. 2002; 4: 531–539.
3. Rerkpattanapipat P, Hundly G, Link KM, Brubaker PH, Hamilton CA, Darty SN, Morgan TM, Kitzman DW. Relation of aortic distensibility determined by magnetic resonance imaging in patients
60 years of age to systolic heart failure and exercise capacity. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90: 1221–1225.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Hundley WG, Kitzman DW, Morgan TM, Hamilton CA, Darty SN, Stewart KP, Herrington DM, Link KM, Little WC. Cardiac cycle dependent changes in aortic area and distensibility are reduced in older patients with isolated diastolic heart failure and correlate with exercise intolerance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 796–802.
5. Bonapace S, Rossi A, Cicoira M, Franceschini L, Golia G, Zanolla L, Marino P, Zardini P. Aortic distensibility independently affects exercise tolerance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1603–1608.
6. Quinones MA, Waggoner AD, Reduto LA, Nelson JG, Young JB, Winter WL, Ribeiro LG, Miller RR. A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1981; 64: 744–753.
7. Ha JW, Oh JK, Pellikka PA, Ommen SR, Stussy VL, Bailey KR, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Diastolic stress echocardiography: A novel noninvasive diagnostic test for diastolic dysfunction using supine bicycle exercise Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18: 63–68.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. The Echo Manual. Second ed. Philadelphia, Pa. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
9. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Borlaug BA, Rodeheffer RJ, Kass DA. Age and gender-related ventricular-vascular stiffening: A community based study. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2254–2262.
10. Kelly RP, Ting CT, Yang TM, Liu CP, Maughan WL, Chang MS, Kass DA. Effective arterial elastance as index of arterial vascular load in humans. Circulation. 1992; 86: 513–521.
11. Najjar SS, Schulman SP, Gerstenblith G, Fleg JL, Kass DA, OConnor F, Becker LC, Lakatta EG. Age and gender affect ventricular-vascular coupling during aerobic exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 611–617.
12. Tofler GH, Stone PH, Muller JE, Willich SN, Davis VG, Poole WK, Strauss HW, Willerson JT, Jaffe AS, Robertson T. Effects of gender and race on prognosis after myocardial infarction: adverse prognosis for women, particularly black women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987; 9: 473–482.[Abstract]
13. Mendes LA, Davidoff R, Cupples LA, Ryan TJ, Jacobs AK. Congestive heart failure in patients with coronary artery disease: the gender paradox. Am Heart J. 1997; 134: 207–212.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. McMurray J, McDonagh T, Morrison CE, Dargie HJ. Trends in hospitalization for heart failure in Scotland 1980–1990. Eur Heart J. 1993; 14: 1158–1162.
15. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Brokat S, Tschope C. Role of gender in heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007; 49: 241–251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Otsuki T, Maeda S, Lemitsu M, Saito Y, Tanimura Y, Ajisaka R, Miyauchi T. Contribution of systemic arterial compliance and systemic vascular resistance to effective arterial elastance changes during exercise in humans. Acta Physiol. 2006; 188: 15–20.[CrossRef]
17. Waddell TK, Dart AM, Gatzka CD, Cameron JD, Kingwell BA. Women exhibit a greater age-related increase in proximal aortic stiffness than men. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 2205–2212.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Borlaug BA, Melenovsky V, Redfeld MM, Kessler K, Chang HJ, Abraham TP, Kass DA. Impact of arterial loading sequence on left ventricular tissue velocities in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 1570–1577.
19. Wilkinson IB, Franklin SS, Hall IR, Tyrrell S, Cockroft JR. Pressure amplification explains why pulse pressure is unrelated to risk in young subjects. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 1461–1466.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. D. Chantler, E. G. Lakatta, and S. S. Najjar Arterial-ventricular coupling: mechanistic insights into cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1342 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |