| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:1312.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the McKnight Brain Institute (J.A.H.P., A.J.F., M.K.R.) and Departments of Physiology and Functional Genomics (J.A.H.P., A.J.F., M.K.R.) and Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine (D.A.O.), College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacodynamics, College of Pharmacy (M.J.K., V.S., Y.Q.), and Department of Chemistry, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (R.K.C., A.J.L., V.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; and the Departments of Morphology (A.J.F.) and Physiology and Biophysics (R.A.S.S.), Biological Sciences Institute, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Correspondence to Mohan K. Raizada, Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, PO Box 100274, Gainesville, FL 32610. E-mail mraizada{at}phys.med.ufl.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: structure-based drug design angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 virtual screening molecular docking cardiovascular disease angiotensin (1-7)
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Virtual Screening
The DOCKv5.2 package9 was used for in silico screening of
140 000 compounds available from the National Cancer Institute Developmental Therapeutics Program. This computer database was prepared with DOCK accessory software (SF2MOL2, University of California San Francisco) and Sybyl (Tripos, Inc). Each compound was docked as a rigid body in
100 different orientations. The orientations were filtered by default bump filter parameters to exclude compounds with pronounced steric clashes. The grid-based scoring system was used for scoring with the nonbonded force field energy function implemented in DOCK. A standard 6 to 12 Lennard-Jones potential was used to evaluate van der Waals contacts. Spheres used by DOCK during matching algorithms were generated by SPHGEN.10
Sites for molecular docking were identified by structural analysis in which the differences between the molecular surfaces of ACE2 in the open and closed conformation were calculated with DSSP.11 Three different molecular surface pockets, remote to the active site of ACE2, were selected with SPHGEN to dock and rank the compounds of the National Cancer Institute database. Two sites were selected in the inhibitor-bound form of the enzyme (sites 2 and 3, PDBID12 14RL), and a single site was selected in the open conformation of ACE2 (site 1, PDBID 14R2). Structural analysis indicates that these surface sites are unique to only 1 of the 2 conformations.
After ranking with DOCK, the top-scoring compounds for each site were tested in vitro with human recombinant ACE2 (R&D Systems). Active compounds were modeled bound to ACE2 with DOCK and were docked in
3000 orientations, energy minimized, and with flexible bond parameters enabled. Other parameters such as the number of minimization steps and number of conformations were also exhausted until the score for each compound converged and did not improve further.
Animals
All of the animal procedures were performed in compliance with approved International Animal Care and Use Convention protocols and University of Florida regulations. Male Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) of 14 to 16 weeks of age (300- to 325-g body weight) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, Mass).
Acute Hemodynamic Measurements
Mean arterial pressure and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored in SHRs and WKY animals (n=3 to 9) fitted with both a jugular and carotid cannulae. Briefly, animals were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine, xylazine, and acepromazine (30, 6, and 1 mg/kg, respectively). A polyethylene cannula (PE-50, Clay Adams) was introduced into the carotid artery for direct blood pressure (BP) measurements, whereas a silicone elastomer cannula (Helix Medical) was introduced into the descending jugular vein for acute intravenous injections of the drug. Both cannulae were filled with heparin saline (40 U/mL, Sigma), and sealed with stylets. Dose-response curves were obtained in awake, freely moving animals after a 24- to 48-hour recovery period. Doses of xanthenone (XNT) (0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) were applied as a bolus administration via the jugular cannula, and BP and HR data were recorded and interfaced to a PowerLab (ADInstruments) signal transduction unit. Data were analyzed using the Chart program supplied with the PowerLab system.
Chronic Hemodynamic Measurements
Osmotic minipumps (Alzet, model 2004) containing either 10 mg/mL of XNT (60 µg/d; 28 days; n=9) or vehicle (saline; pH 2.0 to 2.5) were implanted SC after allowing them to equilibrate in sterile saline at 37°C for 24 hours. XNT was delivered at an infusion rate of 260 ng/kg per minute. BP was measured indirectly by the tail-cuff method in conscious animals every week for 4 weeks.
After 28 days of saline or XNT infusion, animals were cannulated as described above, and acute hemodynamic responses to Ang II (5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 ng/kg), bradykinin (BK; 0.06, 0.60, 6.00, 14.00, and 28.00 ng/kg), and losartan (0.25 mg/kg) were measured in both WKY rats and SHRs.
Isolated Heart Preparation
After analysis of the BP responses to Ang II, BK, and losartan, animals were allowed to recover for 24 hours. An IP injection of heparin (400 IU) was administered to each animal. Ten to 15 minutes later, the hearts were dissected and perfused according to the Langendorff technique. Briefly, hearts were perfused through an aortic stump with Krebs Ringer solution containing 118.4 mmol/L of NaCl, 4.7 mmol/L of KCl, 1.2 mmol/L of KH2PO4, 1.2 mmol/L of MgSO4 · 7H2O, 2.5 mmol/L of CaCl2 · 2H2O, 11.7 mmol/L of glucose, and 26.5 mmol/L of NaHCO3. The perfusion flow was maintained constant (8 to 10 mL/min) at 37±1°C along with constant oxygenation (5% CO2 and 95% O2). Intraventricular pressure and coronary perfusion pressure were continuously recorded using a PowerLab signal transduction unit (ADInstruments). After 20 to 30 minutes of stabilization, functional parameters were recorded for an additional period of 30 minutes. Data from vehicle or XNT-treated animals were analyzed electronically with Chart software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Approximately 140 000 small molecules were each docked (DOCK 5.2) into the 3 selected sites in 100 different orientations and ranked by energy score. The top 10 scoring compounds for each of 3 sites are listed in Table S1. The compounds directed at site 1 share physicochemical characteristics with Food and Drug Administration–approved orally available drugs. These predominantly uncharged compounds are consistent with drug-likeness criteria (molecular weight: <500; octanol/water partition coefficients: <5; H-bond donors: <5; H-bond acceptors: <10).16 In contrast to site 1, compounds molecularly docked into sites 2 and 3 included charged compounds of larger molecular weight or with those other unfavorable characteristics for drug absorption and permeability. The shared characteristics of these molecularly docked compounds likely reflect the properties of the structural pockets selected for virtual screening, and the results suggest that site 1 is a better fit for the ligation of a drug-like molecule.
The highest scoring compounds directed at ACE2 structural pockets in the open and closed conformations were tested in vitro for their ability to modulate ACE2 activity. Gene transfer experiments leading to increased ACE2 mRNA levels by 2- to 3-fold17 and studies on clinically available Ang-converting enzyme inhibitors18 that report a similar increase in ACE2 mRNA and plasma Ang-(1-7) show improvements in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Based on this evidence and the emerging trend that these beneficial effects are mediated by ACE2 activity and Ang-(1-7), compounds capable of enhancing ACE2 activity by 2- to 3-fold are expected to have a physiological effect in vivo. We found 2 compounds that enhanced ACE2 activity by
1.8- to 2.2-fold of control levels (Figure 1G), XNT and resorcinolnaphthalein (third and sixth highest scoring compounds out of
140 000 for the open conformation, site 1; Figure 1D and 1F). The compounds enhance ACE2 activity in a dose-dependent manner with EC50 values (concentration to achieve 50% enhancement of activity) of 20.1±0.8 and 19.5±0.4 µmol/L, respectively. They were both selected by molecular docking into the structural pocket on site 1 (Figure 1C and 1E). Because XNT is significantly more soluble than resorcinolnaphthalein, it was selected for large-scale synthesis and in vivo testing. Both XNT and resorcinolnaphthalein are selective in their specificity for ACE2, because they showed no significant effects on enhancing ACE activity (Figure 1G). Based on its ACE2 selectivity and available toxicology data demonstrating its safety (
200 mg/kg in rodents), we tested XNT in vivo to determine its effects on cardiovascular pathophysiology.
Effects of an ACE2 Activator on BP, Heart Function, and Tissue Remodeling
Acute intravenous injections of XNT resulted in a rapid and transient decrease in BP (Figure 2A and 2B). It caused a significant decrease in BP in the SHRs with a dose as low as 1 mg/kg. A maximal decrease of 71±9 mm Hg on BP was observed with 10 mg/kg (Figure 2B). Decreases in BP were accompanied by decreases in HR (Figure 2C and 2D). In contrast to SHRs, XNT had no significant effect on WKY rat BP with 1 mg/kg and showed only modest decreases in BP with 5 and 10 mg/kg. Thus, the antihypertensive effect of XNT was significantly more pronounced in the SHRs compared with WKY rats (Figure 2A and 2B). Compared with the 71±9 mm Hg decrease observed in the SHRs, only a 21±8 mm Hg decrease was observed in WKY rats with a dose of 10 mg/kg (P<0.05). Sprague-Dawley rats showed a response to XNT that was similar to WKY rats (data not shown). In addition, vehicle alone did not show any significant effects on BP or HR in either strain of rats. Chronic infusion of XNT produced a significant reduction in the BP of SHRs but not in WKY rats. The decrease in BP during XNT infusion was gradual, and it achieved the maximal effect (17 mm Hg; 2-way ANOVA; P<0.05) by the third week (Figure S1). However, chronic treatment of SHRs with XNT did not cause any significant changes in either HRs (363±19 bpm, n=8 in controls versus 366±24 bpm, n=7 in XNT-treated rats) or body weights (321±8 g, n=8 in controls versus 332±12 g, n=9 in XNT-treated rats).
|
Because ACE2 is involved in the metabolism of Ang peptides and kallikrein-kinin system peptides, the BP responses to acute administration of BK and Ang II and to the Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan were evaluated in WKY rats and SHRs after 4 weeks of XNT infusion. BK-induced decreases in BP were more pronounced in XNT-treated WKY rats and SHRs (Supplemental Figure S1). Also, the potentiation of this BK hypotensive effect in XNT-treated rats was significantly greater in the SHRs compared with the WKY rats (43±12 mm Hg versus 28±8 mm Hg; P<0.05; Figure S1). However, no significant differences in Ang II–induced increase or losartan-induced decrease in BP were observed between saline and XNT-treated WKY rats and SHRs (data not shown).
In addition, XNT effects on cardiac function were analyzed using the Langendorff preparation. Chronic infusion of XNT resulted in an increase in +dP/dt and –dP/dt in SHRs (Figure S1). No significant changes were observed in left ventricular systolic pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, perfusion pressure, or HR (data not shown).
Finally, previous studies have demonstrated that ACE2 overexpression by gene transfer prevents cardiac fibrosis.8 This observation led us to test the possibility that XNT activation of ACE2 would reverse cardiac fibrosis induced by hypertension. Thus, the effect of chronic XNT infusion on cardiac and renal fibrosis was examined. Chronic XNT treatment caused a significant reversal of both myocardial and perivascular fibrosis in the SHR heart (Figure 3A and 3B). Similarly, a significant reversal in renal interstitial fibrosis was observed in SHRs chronically treated with XNT (Figure 3C). Representative images demonstrating the effect of XNT on fibrosis are presented as Figure S2.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we began to test the hypothesis that targeting a specific enzyme conformation with small drug-like molecules will enhance enzymatic activity by shifting the conformational equilibrium of the enzyme favorably for its activity. This hypothesis is based on recent enzyme structure, dynamic and kinetic data demonstrating that conformational changes involved in the binding or release of ligands may be rate limiting.19–21 Importantly, the monovalent anion-dependent enhancement of activity22 observed for our model enzyme, ACE2, has been suggested to occur by this mechanism.13 For hinge-bending enzymes, such as ACE2, the large conformational change that opens and closes their active site allows for a unique opportunity to measure the effects of targeting specific enzyme conformations in a key protein involved in regulating BP and CVD. In this study, we attempted to understand how drug-like molecules can be developed to probe protein dynamics and enhance enzyme activity.
With these considerations in mind, >140 000 small molecules were molecularly docked into structural pockets present in crystal structures of ACE2 in the open and closed conformations (Table S1). Selected compounds were tested in vitro and allowed us to identify 2 active compounds directed at a structural pocket present in the open conformation of ACE2: XNT and resorcinolnaphthalein. Both compounds enhanced ACE2 activity in a dose-dependent manner and were ACE2 specific, because they did not significantly affect ACE activity. These data demonstrate the selective strength of this novel approach in pinpointing specific structural pockets and conformations, because the ACE2 and ACE catalytic domains share 42% sequence identity.13
The observation that 20% of the compounds directed at site 1 function in enhancing ACE2 activity, whereas no compounds directed at sites 2 and 3 enhance enzyme activity, suggests that the structural pocket defined by site 1 in the open conformation may be a valid target for therapeutic development. Structural analysis shows that both conformations of ACE2 have 10 to 15 surface pockets with adequate solvent accessible volumes (DSSP11 and castP23), but only a few of these sites are unique to 1 specific conformation. This structure-based approach is distinctly different from those used in previous efforts, because multiple specific enzyme conformations were targeted distal to the active site with the goal of enhancing enzyme activity. Molecular docking, using the parameters described in this study, has been shown previously in inhibitor studies to yield hit rates significantly higher (20% to 80%) than by random screening (0.2 to 2.4).14,15 Our results suggest that virtual screening methods may also become rapid and economical tools for the development of enzyme activators.
To validate our strategy, we selected XNT for in vivo studies because of its more favorable solubility properties for administration. Bolus injection of XNT caused a dose-dependent decrease in BP and HR, which was significantly more pronounced in the SHRs compared with WKY and Sprague-Dawley rats. The effect on HR could be the consequence of a direct action of XNT in the heart, direct change in the autonomic activity (increase vagal or decrease sympathetic tonus), or changes in the set point of the baroreflex at the central nervous system. An effect on the central nervous system is consistent with observations after overexpression of ACE2 in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, which resulted in a marked decrease of BP and HR in SHRs.24 It is important to note that XNT did not elicit any changes in the HR of isolated hearts. However, we cannot exclude a direct effect of XNT on HR, because isolated heart perfusion was performed after 4 weeks of systemic XNT infusion and not directly with a solution containing XNT. More importantly, chronic infusion of XNT also induced a reduction in the BP of SHRs but did not alter HR. The unaffected HR in this protocol was probably because of the different approaches used (acute versus chronic administration) and the final effective plasma concentration of XNT after acute and chronic treatment. Finally, we observed a modest decrease in high BP in the SHRs by chronic infusion of XNT in contrast to its robust effect when this compound was administered acutely. This difference in the efficacy could be because of half-life, biodegradability, solubility, and/or pharmacokinetics of this lead compound in vivo under chronic conditions.
Consistent with the beneficial effects of ACE2 activation on BP, we found that cardiac function was improved in isolated hearts after chronic infusion of XNT in the SHRs. The mechanism of this improvement remains to be elucidated; however, an indirect effect as a result of the decrease in BP is a possibility. Because XNT-treated SHRs also presented a reversal in myocardial and perivascular fibrosis, the improvement in heart function is more likely because of the marked reduction in collagen deposition in cardiac tissue. In fact, if after ACE2 activation there is an increased Ang-(1-7) production with concomitant degradation of Ang II, this hypothesis is plausible, because Ang II is a profibrotic peptide24 and Ang-(1-7) possesses antifibrotic actions.25–27 The antifibrotic effect of XNT was not limited to the heart, because it also reversed interstitial fibrosis in kidneys of SHRs.
As anticipated, the hypotensive effect of BK is more pronounced in SHRs than in WKY rats. Furthermore, we observed that XNT infusion potentiates the BK response in WKY rats and SHRs. Again, these data suggest that the XNT actions may be, at least partially, mediated by an increased Ang-(1-7) production, because it has been demonstrated that Ang-(1-7) potentiates the hypotensive effect of BK in previous preparations.28
This study is of broad relevance for 2 reasons. First, evidence suggests that development of a new class of antihypertensive drugs (specific for ACE2) may serve as a complementary strategy in the treatment of CVD. Second, we describe a rational structure-based approach for increasing specific enzymatic activities. This novel approach is suited to a variety of challenging clinical goals, such as the prevention and treatment of protein conformational disorders (eg, retinitis pigmentosa,
-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and Alzheimers disease).
Perspectives
Despite recent successes in the treatment and control of hypertension and its associated cardiovascular pathophysiology, the prevalence of CVD has risen steadily in the last several decades. Thus, innovative strategies are needed, and new targets must be developed to overcome this debilitating disease. In this study, we present evidence that a novel and rational structure-based approach can be used to discover activators of ACE2 with effective antihypertensive properties. It also demonstrates that the activator is effective in the reversal of cardiac and renal fibrosis induced by hypertension. Our observations may also have a broader relevance in that the structure-based approach of increasing enzyme activity may be well suited to a variety of other challenging clinical goals involving protein conformational disorders, such as Alzheimers disease and
-1 antitrypsin deficiency.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Source of Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant HL56921.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 14, 2007; first decision December 24, 2007; accepted March 4, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Tipnis SR, Hooper NM, Hyde R, Karran E, Christie G, Turner AJ. A human homolog of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Cloning and functional expression as a captopril-insensitive carboxypeptidase. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 33238–33243.
3. Crackower MA, Sarao R, Oudit GY, Yagil C, Kozieradzki I, Scanga SE, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, da CJ, Zhang L, Pei Y, Scholey J, Ferrario CM, Manoukian AS, Chappell MC, Backx PH, Yagil Y, Penninger JM. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function. Nature. 2002; 417: 822–828.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Tikellis C, Cooper ME, Bialkowski K, Johnston CI, Burns WC, Lew RA, Smith AI, Thomas MC. Developmental expression of ACE2 in the SHR kidney: a role in hypertension? Kidney Int. 2006; 70: 34–41.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Zisman LS, Keller RS, Weaver B, Lin Q, Speth R, Bristow MR, Canver CC. Increased angiotensin-(1-7)-forming activity in failing human heart ventricles: evidence for upregulation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme Homologue ACE2. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1707–1712.
6. Ishiyama Y, Gallagher PE, Averill DB, Tallant EA, Brosnihan KB, Ferrario CM. Upregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 after myocardial infarction by blockade of angiotensin II receptors. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 970–976.
7. Ocaranza MP, Godoy I, Jalil JE, Varas M, Collantes P, Pinto M, Roman M, Ramirez C, Copaja M, az-Araya G, Castro P, Lavandero S. Enalapril attenuates downregulation of Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in the late phase of ventricular dysfunction in myocardial infarcted rat. Hypertension. 2006; 48: 572–578.
8. Diez-Freire C, Vazquez J, Correa de Adjounian MF, Ferrari MF, Yuan L, Silver X, Torres R, Raizada MK. ACE2 gene transfer attenuates hypertension-linked pathophysiological changes in the SHR. Physiol Genomics. 2006; 27: 12–19.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Ewing TJ, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID. DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2001; 15: 411–428.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol. 1982; 161: 269–288.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983; 22: 2577–2637.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28: 235–242.
13. Towler P, Staker B, Prasad SG, Menon S, Tang J, Parsons T, Ryan D, Fisher M, Williams D, Dales NA, Patane MA, Pantoliano MW. ACE2 X-ray structures reveal a large hinge-bending motion important for inhibitor binding and catalysis. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 17996–18007.
14. Doman TN, McGovern SL, Witherbee BJ, Kasten TP, Kurumbail R, Stallings WC, Connolly DT, Shoichet BK. Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. J Med Chem. 2002; 45: 2213–2221.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Xing L, Hodgkin E, Liu Q, Sedlock D. Evaluation and application of multiple scoring functions for a virtual screening experiment. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2004; 18: 333–344.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001; 46: 3–26.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Huentelman MJ, Grobe JL, Vazquez J, Stewart JM, Mecca AP, Katovich MJ, Ferrario CM, Raizada MK. Protection from angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis by systemic lentiviral delivery of ACE2 in rats. Exp Physiol. 2005; 90: 783–790.
18. Ferrario CM, Jessup J, Chappell MC, Averill DB, Brosnihan KB, Tallant EA, Diz DI, Gallagher PE. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2605–2610.
19. Eisenmesser EZ, Millet O, Labeikovsky W, Korzhnev DM, Wolf-Watz M, Bosco DA, Skalicky JJ, Kay LE, Kern D. Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis. Nature. 2005; 438: 117–121.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kern D, Eisenmesser EZ, Wolf-Watz M. Enzyme dynamics during catalysis measured by NMR spectroscopy. Methods Enzymol. 2005; 394: 507–524.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Wolf-Watz M, Thai V, Henzler-Wildman K, Hadjipavlou G, Eisenmesser EZ, Kern D. Linkage between dynamics and catalysis in a thermophilic-mesophilic enzyme pair. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004; 11: 945–949.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Vickers C, Hales P, Kaushik V, Dick L, Gavin J, Tang J, Godbout K, Parsons T, Baronas E, Hsieh F, Acton S, Patane M, Nichols A, Tummino P. Hydrolysis of biological peptides by human angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 14838–14843.
23. Dundas J, Ouyang Z, Tseng J, Binkowski A, Turpaz Y, Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: W116–W118.
24. Mezzano SA, Ruiz-Ortega M, Egido J. Angiotensin II and renal fibrosis. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 635–638.
25. Ferreira AJ, Oliveira TL, Castro MC, Almeida AP, Castro CH, Caliari MV, Gava E, Kitten GT, Santos RAS. Isoproterenol-induced impairment of heart function and remodeling are attenuated by the nonpeptide angiotensin-(1-7) analogue AVE 0991. Life Sci. 2007; 81: 916–923.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Santos RAS, Castro CH, Gava E, Pinheiro SV, Almeida AP, Paula RD, Cruz JS, Ramos AS, Rosa KT, Irigoyen MC, Bader M, Alenina N, Kitten GT, Ferreira AJ. Impairment of in vitro and in vivo heart function in angiotensin-(1-7) receptor MAS knockout mice. Hypertension. 2006; 47: 996–1002.
27. Grobe JL, Mecca AP, Mao H, Katovich MJ. Chronic angiotensin-(1-7) prevents cardiac fibrosis in DOCA-salt model of hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006; 290: H2417–H2423.
28. Brosnihan KB, Li P, Ferrario CM. Angiotensin-(1-7) dilates canine coronary arteries through kinins and nitric oxide. Hypertension. 1996; 27: 523–528.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Ferreira, V. Shenoy, M. J. Katovich, and M. K. Raizada New Targets in Pulmonary Hypertension--Another ACE Up the Sleeve Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2009; 180(5): 482 - 482. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Ferreira, V. Shenoy, Y. Yamazato, S. Sriramula, J. Francis, L. Yuan, R. K. Castellano, D. A. Ostrov, S. P. Oh, M. J. Katovich, et al. Evidence for Angiotensin-converting Enzyme 2 as a Therapeutic Target for the Prevention of Pulmonary Hypertension Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2009; 179(11): 1048 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. Oudit, Y. Imai, K. Kuba, J. W. Scholey, and J. M. Penninger The role of ACE2 in pulmonary diseases--relevance for the nephrologist Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1362 - 1365. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Kluskens, S. A. Nelemans, R. Rink, L. de Vries, A. Meter-Arkema, Y. Wang, T. Walther, A. Kuipers, G. N. Moll, and M. Haas Angiotensin-(1-7) with Thioether Bridge: An Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-Resistant, Potent Angiotensin-(1-7) Analog J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2009; 328(3): 849 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Turner Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2: Cardioprotective Player in the Renin-Angiotensin System? Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): 816 - 817. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |