| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:1318.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Inserm (L.B., A.F., Y.M., C.F., C.L-C.), U 691, Paris, France; Collège de France (L.B., A.F., Y.F., C.F., C.L-C.), Paris, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI (L.B., A.F., Y.M., C.F., C.L-C.), Paris, France; Inserm (N.I., B.R.), U640, Paris, France; Université Paris V (N.I., B.R.), Paris, France; and the Quantum Genomics (F.B.), Massy, France.
Correspondence to Catherine Llorens-Cortes, Inserm U 691, Collège de France, 11 Place Marcelin Berthelot, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France. E-mail c.llorens-cortes{at}college-de-france.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: aminopeptidase A inhibitors blood pressure brain renin-angiotensin system DOCA-salt rats hypertension
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20% of the adult population, of which 95% have essential hypertension. Blockers of the systemic renin-angiotensin system (RAS), angiotensin (Ang) I–converting enzyme (ACE; EC 3.4.15.11) inhibitors or Ang II receptor type 1 (AT1) antagonists, have since been shown to be efficient and safe for treating hypertension.1 However, they may cause secondary effects, such as coughing, deterioration of renal function in cases of underlying renal artery stenosis, and, more rarely, angioedema.2–7 In addition, these agents are not very effective in some patients, particularly African Americans, in whom high blood pressure (BP) is associated with low renin levels and a response to salt depletion.8,9 The development of new classes of antihypertensive agents with different mechanisms of action, therefore, remains an important goal. In this way, because a brain RAS hyperactivity has been implicated in the development and maintenance of hypertension,10–13 its components could constitute interesting targets. Among the bioactive peptides of the brain RAS, Ang II and Ang III display similar affinities for AT1 receptors.14,15 When injected into the brain, these peptides similarly increase BP.16,17 However, because AngII is converted in vivo into AngIII, the nature of the effector peptide of the brain RAS remains to be define. We first developed specific and selective aminopeptidase A (APA; EC 3.4.11.7) and aminopeptidase N (APN; EC 3.4.11.2) inhibitors, (3S)-3-amino-4-sulfanyl-butane-1-sulfonic acid (EC33) and (2S)-2-amino-4-methylsulfanyl butane thiol (PC18), respectively,18,19 and used these new tools to demonstrate in the murine brain that APA and APN are involved in vivo in the metabolism of brain Ang II and Ang III, respectively (Figure 1).20 Then, we showed in rats that ICV injection of EC33 blocked the pressor response of exogenous Ang II,21 suggesting that, in the brain, the conversion of Ang II to Ang III is required to increase BP. The specificity of action of EC33 on Ang II metabolism was shown by the lack of effect of EC33 on the Ang III-induced BP increase. More interestingly, ICV injection, but not IV injection, of EC33 alone caused a dose-dependent decrease in BP in alert spontaneously hypertensive rats, a model of essential hypertension sensitive to RAS blockers, and DOCA-salt rats, a salt- and volume-dependent model of hypertension22,23 resistant to systemic RAS blockers.21,24,25 This suggests that the blockade of the formation of brain but not systemic Ang III is responsible for the decrease in BP. This conclusion was strengthened by the fact that the selective APN inhibitor PC18, administered alone via the ICV route, increased BP.21 This pressor response was blocked by previous treatment with the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan,21 showing that blocking the action of APN on Ang III metabolism leads to an increase in endogenous Ang III levels, resulting in BP increase, through interaction with AT1 receptors. Finally, the finding that EC33 completely blocked the PC18-induced increase in BP confirmed that endogenous brain Ang III is produced from endogenous brain Ang II under the action of APA. Together, these data demonstrated that Ang III, generated by APA, is one of the main effector peptides of the brain RAS, exerting a tonic stimulatory control over BP in alert hypertensive rats.21,24 This conclusion was confirmed by Wright et al26 using the same inhibitors. The interpretation of these results has been challenged recently.27 Aminopeptidase-resistant Ang II analogs were injected ICV into alert normotensive rats and caused an increase in BP because of AT1 receptor activation, leading the authors to postulate that Ang II, rather than Ang III, is the main active form controlling BP in the brain. However, the finding that ICV injection of exogenous Ang II analogs exhibiting a very slow degradation rate and binding efficiently with AT1 receptors was expected to increase BP. In fact, in contrast to Ang II, which, even the in presence of an APA inhibitor, may be rapidly degraded by other peptidases, such a dipeptidyl aminopeptidases, endopeptidases, or carboxypeptidases (ACE2), giving birth to Ang3-8 (Ang IV), Ang1-5, Ang4-8, and Ang1-7,20,27,28 with all of the peptides being inactive on AT1 receptors, the Ang II analog N-Methyl-L-Asp1-Ang II is not metabolized in Ang III but also not in Ang IV or in Ang1-5. Only the metabolite Ang 2-5 was detected, underlining the different metabolism profiles of Ang II and N-Methyl-L-Asp1-Ang II. This shows that the use of exogenous Ang II analogs does not allow conclusions on the mechanism of action of endogenous Ang II and Ang III.
|
Therefore, brain APA generating brain Ang III may be considered as a new potential therapeutic target for the treatment of hypertension. However, EC33 does not cross the blood-brain barrier.21 We, therefore, designed 4,4'-dithio {bis[(3S)-3-aminobutyl sulfonic acid]} (RB150),24 a systemically active prodrug of EC33 obtained by disulfide bridge-mediated dimerization. We showed previously that IV RB150 enters the brain, blocks brain RAS activity, and markedly reduces BP in conscious hypertensive DOCA-salt rats.24 If APA inhibitors are to be used as orally administered centrally active antihypertensive agents, we first needed to investigate their central bioavailability after oral administration, leading to blockade of the brain RAS.
In this study, we demonstrated that RB150 was able to enter the brain, after PO administration, and caused a sustained inhibition of APA, thereby decreasing BP in conscious hypertensive DOCA-salt rats. RB150 also decreased plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) levels, increased diuresis, and induced a mild natriuresis, without affecting kaliuresis, thereby reducing blood volume. RB150, therefore, constitutes the first orally active inhibitor of central APA and could be the prototype of a new class of antihypertensive agents that could be clinically tested as an additional treatment for hypertension.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
Experiments were performed on male normotensive Wistar Kyoto (WKY), sham, and hypertensive DOCA-salt rats (200 to 300 g, Charles River Laboratories, LArbresle, France). Sham and DOCA-salt rats were obtained as described previously.24 All of the animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
APA Activity Measurements
In vitro APA enzymatic activity was determined using recombinant mouse APA and 2-L-glutamyl-β-naphthylamide (Bachem) as a synthetic substrate, as described previously (please see http://hyper. ahajournals.org).18,29 The inhibitory potencies of RB150 and EC33 were evaluated in parallel (n=15).30 For ex vivo APA enzymatic activity measurements, rats were deprived of food 12 hours before a 300-µL oral administration of saline or RB150 (7.5 to 50.0 mg/kg). Brains were collected 3.5 or 24.0 hours later, and one half of the brain was homogenized by sonication.24,29 Bestatin, an inhibitor of nonspecific aminopeptidases, was added at a concentration not sufficient to inhibit APA activity (1 µmol/L).29,31,32 Assays were performed in presence or absence of EC33 (5 µmol/L).
In Vitro Pharmacological Profile
Binding affinities and inhibition activities of RB150 (1 and 10 µmol/L) and EC33 (1 and 10 µmol/L) for AT1, AT2, and endothelin A and B, and against ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2), endothelin-converting enzyme 1 (ECE-1), and neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP; Table 1) were assessed in in vitro assays performed at Cerep Co.
|
Surgical Methods and BP Recording
Catheters were implanted in the femoral artery and vein.24,33 RB150 (0.1 to 30.0 mg/kg PO), EC33 (15 mg/kg IV), or saline (PO) was administered (300 µL) in conscious, unrestrained rats (please see the online data supplement available at http://hyper.ahajournals.org). After PO acute treatment with RB150 or saline, BP was monitored during 7 hours on the first day of experiment. For DOCA-salt rats given saline or RB150 (15 mg/kg), another recording of 1 hour was performed at 24 and 48 hours postadministration.
For DOCA-salt rats treated with EC33, BP was recorded for 5 hours after the IV injection. Mean BP (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were calculated with the MacLab system (Phymep).21,24
Urine and Electrolyte Output and Fluid Consumption Measurements
Normotensive WKY and hypertensive DOCA-salt rats were individually housed in metabolic cages (Tecniplast). After acclimatization over a period of 3 days, fluid consumption, urinary excretion of water, and electrolytes were measured for each rat after saline or RB150 (15 mg/kg) PO administration. Urinary Na+ and K+ concentrations were determined using a flame photometer (model 243, Instrumentation Laboratory).
AVP Radioimmunoassay
Plasma AVP concentrations were estimated as described previously (please see the data supplement)20 from 0.2 mL of plasma using a specific radioimmunoassay kit (Peninsula Laboratories).
Data Analysis and Statistics
Data are presented as means±SEMs. Comparisons among groups of APA activities, baseline MBP and HR (values obtained 1 hour before PO administration), MBP and HR after RB150 and EC33 administration, plasma AVP concentration, drinking fluid, urine flow rate, and urinary electrolytes were made with paired or unpaired Students t test or 1-way ANOVA for repeated measures and ANOVA followed by Fishers posthoc least-squares differences correction for multiple comparisons. Differences were considered significant if P value was <0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhibitory Effect of Oral RB150 Administration on Brain APA Activity in Conscious Hypertensive DOCA-Salt Rats
Brain APA activity in hypertensive DOCA-salt rats was 103% and 98% higher than that in normotensive WKY and sham rats (91.5±9.9 nmol of β-naphthylamide (βNA) per milligram of protein per hour versus 45.1±4.1 and 46.2±3.7 nmol of βNA per milligram of protein per hour, respectively; Figure 2A).
|
PO RB150 administration (7.5 to 50 mg/kg) in DOCA-salt rats progressively inhibited brain APA activity after 3.5 hours (Figure 2A). With doses of 15, 30, and 50 mg/kg, APA activity was decreased to
54% of that in DOCA-salt rats given saline PO (43.6±3.8, 41.2±5.0, and 42.6±3.3 nmol of βNA per milligram of protein per hour, respectively, versus 91.5±9.9 nmol of βNA per milligram of protein per hour) and reached the control levels measured in normotensive WKY or sham rats given saline PO (Figure 2A). The brain APA activity of DOCA-salt rats, which have received RB150 (15 mg/kg), is at 93.4±10.0 nmol of βNA per milligram of protein per hour for 24 hours after the administration. The brain APA activity of normotensive WKY rats was not modified by the PO RB150 administration (15 mg/kg): 43.7±0.6 versus 45.1±4.1 nmol of βNA per milligram of protein per hour for RB150 and saline PO administered, respectively.
Oral RB150 Administration Decreases BP in Conscious Hypertensive DOCA-Salt Rats
The baseline MBP of hypertensive DOCA-salt rats (149.5±3.5 mm Hg; n=38) was significantly higher than that of normotensive WKY (n=5) and sham (n=4) rats (105.2±4.1 and 106.9±2.0 mm Hg, respectively). Basal HR was 343.1±7.0 bpm in hypertensive DOCA-salt rats, 371.0±15.5 bpm in normotensive WKY rats, and 330.5±10.0 bpm in sham rats. No significant difference in baseline MBP and HR was found between the different groups of hypertensive DOCA-salt rats used in this study.
The PO administration of RB150 (0.1 to 30.0 mg/kg) decreased MBP in a dose-dependent manner in conscious DOCA-salt rats, with an ED50 of 0.84 mg/kg (Figure 2B and 2C), but did not significantly decrease HR (Table 2). The minimum dose of RB150 (PO) required to normalize brain APA activity and to observe a maximal decrease (–29.0±4.3 mm Hg) in MBP in DOCA-salt rats was 15 mg/kg. The hypotensive effect began 2 hours after administration, was maximal at 5 hours, and remained significant after 7 hours. A nonsignificant hypotensive effect remained after 24 hours, but this effect had disappeared after 48 hours (Figure 2D). The oral administration of saline in conscious DOCA-salt rats, used as an internal control, did not significantly alter MBP or HR, regardless of the time elapsed between administration and recording (between 0 and 48 hours). Interestingly, 5 hours after its oral administration, RB150 (15 mg/kg) had no significant effect on MBP or HR in conscious normotensive WKY and sham rats (Table 2), whereas it decreased MBP in DOCA-salts rats to values significantly different not only from baseline (Figure 2) but also from variations in MBP measured in normotensive WKY and sham rats (Table 2). In contrast, the IV injection of EC33 (15 mg/kg) into conscious DOCA-salt rats did not modify MBP or HR (
MBP: –6.0±5.6 mm Hg and
HR: –4.0±11.7 bpm corresponded with the maximal changes obtained 4.0±0.4 hours after injection; n=5; Table 2).
|
Oral RB150 Administration in Conscious Hypertensive DOCA-Salt Rats Enhances Diuresis, Slightly Affecting Natriuresis but not Kaliuresis, With No Effect on Water Intake
Oral RB150 (15 mg/kg) administration in DOCA-salt rats increased the urinary excretion of water by 50% (3.6±0.3 mL/100 g) and Na+ excretion by 13% (61.8±3.7 µmol/L per 100 g) over those after the oral administration of saline, for a 5-hour analysis (2.4±0.7 mL/100 g, P<0.05, and 54.8±3.8 µmol/L per 100 g, P<0.04, respectively; Figure 3A and 3C). No parallel change in kaliuresis was observed (Figure 3B). The increases in urinary water and Na+ excretion became significant 2 hours after oral administration of the drug (Figure 3A and 3C). In contrast, in the same experimental conditions, we observed no difference in water intake after oral RB150 and oral saline administration in a 5-hour analysis (Figure 3D).
|
Oral RB150 Administration in Conscious Normotensive WKY Rats Did not Modify the Diuresis, Natriuresis, Kaliuresis, and Water Intake
The oral administration of RB150 (15 mg/kg; n=5) in normotensive WKY rats did not induced any significative change in diuresis (1.0±0.1 and 0.8±0.1 mL/100 g, respectively; paired Student t test P=0.07), water intake (1.5±0.1 and 1.8±0.1 mL/100 g, respectively; paired Student t test P=0.13), natriuresis (48.6±11.4 and 47.4±13.6 µmol/L per 100 g; paired Student t test P=0.40) or kaliuresis (63.3±11.3 and 61.6±5.0 µmol/L per 100 g; paired Student t test P=0.43) for a 5-hour analysis as compared with normotensive WKY rats receiving an oral saline administration.
Effect of an Oral Administration of RB150 on Plasma AVP Levels
Plasma AVP levels in DOCA-salt rats (saline PO; n=5) were
59% higher than plasma AVP levels in normotensive WKY (saline PO; n=4; 25.3±0.6 and 15.9±1.3 pg of AVP per milliliter of plasma, respectively; unpaired Student t test P<0.01). In DOCA-salt rats receiving RB150 (15 mg/kg, PO) plasma AVP levels were 20.3±1.5 pg/mL. The difference in plasma AVP levels between normotensive WKY and DOCA-salt rats receiving saline (PO) is 9.4 pg/mL, and the difference in plasma AVP levels between normotensive WKY and DOCA-salt rats receiving RB150 (15 mg/kg, PO) is 4.4 pg/mL. This showed that RB150 treatment reduced by 54% the increase in plasma AVP levels observed in DOCA-salt rats as compared with normotensive WKY rats (unpaired Student t test P<0.01).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As developed in the introduction, we reported previously that brain Ang III, generated by APA from brain Ang II, is one of the main effector peptides of the brain RAS, increasing systemic AVP release and exerting a tonic central control over BP in alert hypertensive rats.11,20,21,24,25 In such a context, if APA inhibitors are to be used as central antihypertensive agents, they must be able to cross the blood-brain barrier and inhibit brain APA activity when administered orally. The central bioavailability of thiol inhibitors of zinc metallopeptidases has been shown to be enhanced by coupling a NEP inhibitor and an APN inhibitor via a disulfide bridge to produce a prodrug.19 We applied a similar approach, increasing the bioavailability of EC33 by dimerization involving a disulfide bond, to generate RB150. In this symmetrical molecule, the thiol group of EC33 is involved in a disulfide bridge and, therefore, cannot interact with the zinc atom present in the active site of zinc metalloproteases,19 such as APA.34,35 In vivo, the disulfide bridge of the prodrug is cleaved by brain reductases,19,36 generating 2 active molecules of EC33, which inhibit APA. The selectivity of EC33 and RB150 toward APA was shown by the lack of affinity of these compounds for other zinc metalloproteases involved in the production or metabolism of vasoactive peptides, such as APN,18 ACE, ACE-2, ECE-1, and NEP, as well as by the absence of binding of these compounds to AT1 and AT2 or endothelin A and B receptors (Table 1) known to be involved in BP regulation. Consistent with these results, the ICV injection of RB150 into conscious mice has been shown to induce an intense and sustained decrease in brain APA activity and Ang III formation, with a time course similar to that for the free thiol inhibitor EC33, demonstrating the rapid cleavage of RB150 in the brain to generate EC33.24 In a similar way, the oral administration of increasing doses of RB150 in DOCA-salt rats resulted in a progressive inhibition of brain APA activity 3.5 hours after treatment, with a maximal reduction of 54% observed for a dose of 15 mg/kg (12 000 nmol per rat). In these conditions, brain APA activity in RB150-treated DOCA-salt rats was similar to that measured in the brain of normotensive WKY rats. However, the RB150-induced decrease in brain APA activity in DOCA-salt rats disappeared 24 hours after treatment and brain APA activity returned to high values. Comparison of the inhibition of brain APA activity obtained after gavage with RB150 (Figure 2A) with the dose-response inhibition curve previously obtained after the ICV administration of EC3324 suggests that
1.0% of the prodrug penetrates the brain. This value is similar to that obtained after the IV injection of RB150 (
1.8%),24 suggesting that the disulfide-bonded dimer is very efficiently transported from the gastrointestinal tract to the blood and then to the brain, reflecting the ability of RB150 to cross the intestinal, hepatic, and blood brain barriers. The brain APA activity was not reduced in normotensive WKY rats that orally received RB150 at a dose of 15 mg/kg. However, we showed previously that a reduction of brain APA activity occurs in normotensive mice after IV injection of a high dose of RB150 (50 mg/kg).24 We can hypothesize that the dose of RB150 PO administered in normotensive WKY rats is probably insufficient to reach and inhibit brain APA activity. This discrepancy between normotensive WKY and hypertensive DOCA-salt rats could be because of an alteration of the blood-brain barrier observed in the case of chronic hypertension.37 Such an alteration could facilitate the penetration of RB150 in hypertensive animals.
The inhibition of brain APA activity in conscious DOCA-salt rats after the oral administration of 15 mg/kg of RB150 (corresponding with a circulating concentration of 120 nmol in brain) resulted in a 27-mm Hg decrease in BP, equivalent to that observed with the ICV administration of EC33 (150 nmol).24 This hypotensive effect was dose dependent with an ED50 in the 1 mg/kg range. The duration of the hypotensive effect was investigated using a dose of 15 mg/kg, which gave a maximal response. In these conditions, the decrease in BP was observed after 2 hours, maximal after 5 hours, still significant 7 hours after oral administration of the prodrug, and disappeared after 24 hours, the reversal of BP being associated with a return of brain APA activity to high values. The RB150-induced hypotensive effect was large and long lasting, but HR was not significantly affected, suggesting that the sensitivity of the baroreflex was decreased by brain Ang III, consistent with the findings of Lin et al.38 These data are consistent with previous data showing that RB150 given IV24 inhibits brain APA activity, blocks the formation of brain Ang III, and markedly reduces BP for up to 24 hours. Interestingly, there was a difference of
2 hours in the time required to obtain a maximal decrease in BP after the oral administration of 15 mg/kg of RB150 to DOCA-salt rats and that observed after IV injection,24 reflecting the time required for the prodrug to reach its central target. This illustrates the high potency of oral RB150 treatment to inhibit brain RAS APA activity, decreasing BP several hours after a single administration, without changing HR, in an experimental salt-dependent model of hypertension. The hypotensive effect of RB150 is a central but not a peripheral effect, resulting from the blockade of brain APA activity, because its active moiety, EC33, had no effect on BP when given IV to DOCA-salt rats, even at the high dose of 15 mg/kg (Table 2).
The brain RAS controls BP via 3 different mechanisms: increasing systemic AVP release, activating sympathetic premotor neuron activity in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (a key BP regulatory center containing the neurons generating vasomotor tone),39,40 and inhibiting the baroreflex in the nucleus of the solitary tract.13,16 Consistent with the mechanism of action of the brains RAS, the oral administration of RB150 to DOCA-salt rats induced a decrease in plasma AVP levels. This suggests that the oral administration of RB150, by generating EC33 in the brain and blocking the formation of brain Ang III,20,24 decreases, similar to EC33,20,41 the activity of AVP neurons, resulting in a decrease in AVP release into the bloodstream. The increase in diuresis observed after oral RB150 administration may, therefore, be because of the decrease in plasma AVP levels. The consequence of such an increase diuresis would be a reduction in blood volume that may participate in the decrease in BP. RAS hyperactivity has been observed in the brain of DOCA-salt rats and may be partly because of the greater APA activity observed in the brain of this strain compared with normotensive WKY rats.42,43 This may account for the high efficiency with which APA inhibitors decreased BP in this model.
The brain RAS is involved in drinking behavior,17,44 but we observed no change in water intake after oral RB150 administration. This result is consistent with previous studies showing either that AngII is the main effector peptide45–47 or that brain AngII and AngIII are both active in the induction of water intake.48
Perspectives
RB150 is the first orally active prodrug inhibiting brain but not systemic RAS activity, strongly reducing BP several hours after a single administration, without changing HR, in an experimental salt-dependent model of hypertension. APA inhibitors may, therefore, constitute a new class of central antihypertensive agents that could be clinically tested as an additional therapy for the treatment of hypertensive patients. This treatment may be particularly beneficial in hypertensive patients with low plasma renin and high plasma AVP levels, resistant to the antihypertensive medication generally used.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study received financial support in the form of grants from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche and Quantum Genomics Corp and from the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale.
Disclosures
None.
Received July 27, 2007; first decision August 24, 2007; accepted February 19, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Israili ZH, Hall WD. Cough and angioneurotic edema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. A review of the literature and pathophysiology. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117: 234–242.
3. Owen HG, Brecher ME. Atypical reactions associated with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and apheresis. Transfusion. 1994; 34: 891–894.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Fried MR, Eastlund T, Christie B, Mullin GT, Key NS. Hypotensive reactions to white cell-reduced plasma in a patient undergoing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. Transfusion. 1996; 36: 900–903.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Holm EA, Randlov A, Strandgaard S. Brief report: acute renal failure after losartan treatment in a patient with bilateral renal artery stenosis. Blood Press. 1996; 5: 360–362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Saine DR, Ahrens ER. Renal impairment associated with losartan. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124: 775.
7. Johansen TL, Kjaer A. Reversible renal impairment induced by treatment with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist candesartan in a patient with bilateral renal artery stenosis. BMC Nephrol. 2001; 2: 1.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Saunders EJ, Saunders JA. Drug therapy in pregnancy: the lessons of diethylstilbestrol, thalidomide, and bendectin. Health Care Women Int. 1990; 11: 423–432.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Radevski I, Skudicky D, Candy G, Sathekge S, Strugo V, Sareli P. Antihypertensive monotherapy with nisoldipine CC is superior to enalapril in black patients with severe hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1999; 12: 194–203.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ganten D, Hermann K, Bayer C, Unger T, Lang RE. Angiotensin synthesis in the brain and increased turnover in hypertensive rats. Science. 1983; 221: 869–871.
11. Reaux A, de MN, Zini S, Cadel S, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C. PC18, a specific aminopeptidase N inhibitor, induces vasopressin release by increasing the half-life of brain angiotensin III. Neuroendocrinology. 1999; 69: 370–376.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Oparil S, Chen YF, Berecek KH, Calhoun DA, Wyss JM. The role of central nervous system in hypertension. In: Laragh JH and Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathology, Diagnosis and Management. New York, NY: Raven; 1995: 713–740.
13. Guyenet PG. The sympathetic control of blood pressure. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006; 7: 335–346.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Douglas JG. Angiotensin receptor subtypes of the kidney cortex. Am J Physiol. 1987; 253: F1–F7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Wright JW, Harding JW. Brain angiotensin receptor subtypes AT1, AT2, and AT4 and their functions. Regul Pept. 1995; 59: 269–295.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Phillips MI. Functions of angiotensin in the central nervous system. Annu Rev Physiol. 1987; 49: 413–435.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Wright JW, Harding JW. Important role for angiotensin III and IV in the brain renin-angiotensin system. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997; 25: 96–124.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Chauvel EN, Coric P, Llorens-Cortes C, Wilk S, Roques BP, Fournie-Zaluski MC. Investigation of the active site of aminopeptidase A using a series of new thiol-containing inhibitors. J Med Chem. 1994; 37: 1339–1346.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Fournie-Zaluski MC, Coric P, Turcaud S, Lucas E, Noble F, Maldonado R, Roques BP. "Mixed inhibitor-prodrug" as a new approach toward systemically active inhibitors of enkephalin-degrading enzymes. J Med Chem. 1992; 35: 2473–2481.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Zini S, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Chauvel E, Roques BP, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C. Identification of metabolic pathways of brain angiotensin II and III using specific aminopeptidase inhibitors: predominant role of angiotensin III in the control of vasopressin release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 11968–11973.
21. Reaux A, Fournie-Zaluski MC, David C, Zini S, Roques BP, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C. Aminopeptidase A inhibitors as potential central antihypertensive agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 13415–13420.
22. Morton JJ, Casals-Stenzel J, Lever AF, Millar JA, Riegger AJ, Tree M. Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system in experimental hypertension, with a note on the measurement of angiotensin I, II and III during infusion of converting-enzyme inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979; 7: 233S–241S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Itaya Y, Suzuki H, Matsukawa S, Kondo K, Saruta T. Central renin-angiotensin system and the pathogenesis of DOCA-salt hypertension in rats. Am J Physiol. 1986; 251: H261–H268.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Fournie-Zaluski MC, Fassot C, Valentin B, Djordjijevic D, Reaux-Le GA, Corvol P, Roques BP, Llorens-Cortes C. Brain renin-angiotensin system blockade by systemically active aminopeptidase A inhibitors: a potential treatment of salt-dependent hypertension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 7775–7780.
25. Reaux A, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Llorens-Cortes C. Angiotensin III: a central regulator of vasopressin release and blood pressure. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 12: 157–162.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Wright JW, Tamura-Myers E, Wilson WL, Roques BP, Llorens-Cortes C, Speth RC, Harding JW. Conversion of brain angiotensin II to angiotensin III is critical for pressor response in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 284: R725–R733.
27. Kokje RJ, Wilson WL, Brown TE, Karamyan VT, Wright JW, Speth RC. Central pressor actions of aminopeptidase-resistant angiotensin II analogs: challenging the angiotensin III hypothesis. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 1328–1335.
28. Ferrario CM. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and angiotensin-(1–7): an evolving story in cardiovascular regulation. Hypertension. 2006; 47: 515–521.
29. Zini S, Masdehors P, Lenkei Z, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C. Aminopeptidase A: distribution in rat brain nuclei and increased activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neuroscience. 1997; 78: 1187–1193.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Iturrioz X, Vazeux G, Celerier J, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C. Histidine 450 plays a critical role in catalysis and, with Ca2+, contributes to the substrate specificity of aminopeptidase A. Biochemistry. 2000; 39: 3061–3068.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Schalk C, dOrchymont H, Jauch MF, Tarnus C. 3-Amino-2-tetralone derivatives: novel potent and selective inhibitors of aminopeptidase-M (EC 3.4.11.2). Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994; 311: 42–46.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Tieku S, Hooper NM. Inhibition of aminopeptidases N, A and W: a re-evaluation of the actions of bestatin and inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992; 44: 1725–1730.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Gaudet E, Blanc J, Elghozi JL. Role of angiotensin II and catecholamines in blood pressure variability responses to stress in SHR. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: R1265–R1272.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Vazeux G, Wang J, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C. Identification of glutamate residues essential for catalytic activity and zinc coordination in aminopeptidase A. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 9069–9074.
35. Rozenfeld R, Iturrioz X, Maigret B, Llorens-Cortes C. Contribution of molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis to the identification of two structural residues, Arg-220 and Asp-227, in aminopeptidase A. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 29242–29252.
36. Inguimbert N, Coric P, Dhotel H, Bonnard E, Llorens-Cortes C, Mota N, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP. Synthesis and in vitro activities of new non-peptidic APA inhibitors. J Pept Res. 2005; 65: 175–188.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Nag S. Cerebral changes in chronic hypertension: combined permeability and immunohistochemical studies. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1984; 62: 178–184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Lin KS, Chan JY, Chan SH. Involvement of AT2 receptors at NRVL in tonic baroreflex suppression by endogenous angiotensins. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: H2204–H2210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Ross CA, Ruggiero DA, Park DH, Joh TH, Sved AF, Fernandez-Pardal J, Saavedra JM, Reis DJ. Tonic vasomotor control by the rostral ventrolateral medulla: effect of electrical or chemical stimulation of the area containing C1 adrenaline neurons on arterial pressure, heart rate, and plasma catecholamines and vasopressin. J Neurosci. 1984; 4: 474–494.[Abstract]
40. Brown DL, Guyenet PG. Electrophysiological study of cardiovascular neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla in rats. Circ Res. 1985; 56: 359–369.
41. Zini S, Demassey Y, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Bischoff L, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C, Sanderson P. Inhibition of vasopressinergic neurons by central injection of a specific aminopeptidase A inhibitor. Neuroreport. 1998; 9: 825–828.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Nishimura M, Ohtsuka K, Sakamoto M, Nanbu A, Takahashi H, Yoshimura M. Roles of brain angiotensin II and C-type natriuretic peptide in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertension in rats. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 1175–1185.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Masuyama Y, Tsuda K, Kuchii M, Nishio I. Peripheral neural mechanism of hypertension in rat models–peripheral sympathetic neurotransmission in hypertension. J Hypertens. 1986; 4: S189–S192.[CrossRef]
44. Saavedra JM. Brain and pituitary angiotensin. Endocr Rev. 1992; 13: 329–380.
45. Wright JW, Quirk WS, Hanesworth JM, Harding JW. Influence of aminopeptidase inhibitors on brain angiotensin metabolism and drinking in rats. Brain Res. 1988; 441: 215–220.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Yang CC, Chan SH, Chan JY. Physiological Role of Brain Angiotensin III in Drinking Behavior in the Rat. J Biomed Sci. 1996; 3: 203–210.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Faber F, Gembardt F, Sun X, Mizutani S, Siems WE, Walther T. Lack of angiotensin II conversion to angiotensin III increases water but not alcohol consumption in aminopeptidase A-deficient mice. Regul Pept. 2006; 136: 130–137.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Wilson WL, Roques BP, Llorens-Cortes C, Speth RC, Harding JW, Wright JW. Roles of brain angiotensins II and III in thirst and sodium appetite. Brain Res. 2005; 1060: 108–117.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Hypertension 2008 51: 1273-1274.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. S. Huang, M. Ahmad, J. Tan, and F. H. H. Leenen Chronic central versus systemic blockade of AT1 receptors and cardiac dysfunction in rats post-myocardial infarction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): H968 - H975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Claperon, I. Banegas-Font, X. Iturrioz, R. Rozenfeld, B. Maigret, and C. Llorens-Cortes Identification of Threonine 348 as a Residue Involved in Aminopeptidase A Substrate Specificity J. Biol. Chem., April 17, 2009; 284(16): 10618 - 10626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Ferreira and M. K. Raizada Aminopeptidase A: Could It Be a Novel Target for Neurogenic Hypertension? Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1273 - 1274. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |