| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:1552.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Hypertension, University of Medicine and Dentristy of New Jersey (UMDNJ) Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Correspondence to Tudor D. Vagaonescu, MD, PhD, FACC, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Hypertension, UMDNJ Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, One Robert Wood Johnson Place, PO Box 19, MEB 578, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019. E-mail vagaonescu{at}medscape.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
60 years. Atrial fibrillation was an exclusion criterion from the trial. Participants were randomly assigned to stepped care treatment with chlorthalidone and atenolol (n=2365) or placebo (n=2371). The occurrence of atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular events over 4.7 years as well as the determination of cause of death at 4.7 and 14.3 years were followed. Ninety-eight subjects (2.06%) developed atrial fibrillation over 4.7 years mean follow-up, without significant difference between treated and placebo groups. Atrial fibrillation increased the risk for: total cardiovascular events (RR 1.69; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.36), rapid death (RR 3.29; 95% CI 1.08 to 10.00), total (RR 5.10; 95% CI 3.12 to 8.37) and nonfatal left ventricular failure (RR 5.31; 95% CI 3.09 to 9.13). All-cause and total cardiovascular death were significantly increased in the atrial fibrillation group at 4.7 years (HR 3.44; 95% CI 2.18 to 5.42; HR 2.39; 95% CI 1.05 to 5.43) and 14.3 years follow-up (HR 2.33; 95% CI 1.83 to 2.98; HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.54 to 3.17). Atrial fibrillation increased the risk for total cardiovascular events, rapid death, and left ventricular failure. All-cause mortality and total cardiovascular mortality were significantly increased in hypertensives with atrial fibrillation at 4.7 and 14.3 years follow-up.
Key Words: hypertension elderly atrial fibrillation chlorthalidone atenolol incidence death
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, no study addressed specifically the incidence of AF, the relationship of AF on cardiovascular events, and the effect of antihypertensive treatment versus placebo on the incidence of AF in a well-characterized hypertensive population. To answer these questions we performed a posthoc analysis of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) database.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
60 years with hypertension as defined was followed up for an average of 4.7 years. Patients were randomized in a double-blind manner to a once-daily dose of either active drug treatment or matching placebo. The objective of the stepped care treatment program was to use the minimal amount of medication to maintain SBP at or below the goal (decrease in baseline SBP of at least 20 mm Hg and a SBP of less than 160 mm Hg). The first treatment step was chlorthalidone 12.5 mg/d (or matching placebo), which could be doubled if the participants SBP was not controlled at goal. If the SBP goal was not reached at the maximal dose (25 mg/d) of step 1 medication, atenolol 25 mg/d (or matching placebo) was added as the usual step 2 drug. Low-dose reserpine (0.05 mg/d) was substituted in those with contraindication to atenolol.7,8 Participants were followed monthly until SBP reached goal or until the maximum level of stepped-care treatment was achieved. All participants had quarterly visits from the date of randomization, at which they underwent measurement of blood pressure, heart rate, and body weight, and a medical history and detailed review of medication use were done.7 A 12 lead ECG (1 minute) and 2 minutes of rhythm strip were done at baseline9 and a 12 lead ECG was done at the second and final annual visits.7 All electrocardiograms collected in SHEP were read at the coding center using a protocol for continuous voltage and duration measurement and categorical coding according to the Minnesota code.9
The primary end point was fatal and nonfatal stroke, and secondary end points included transient ischemic attack, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, left ventricular failure, sudden cardiac death, rapid cardiac death, other cardiovascular death. For combined end points, participants with multiple end points were counted only once.7
Atrial fibrillation was an exclusion criterion at baseline. The occurrence of AF during follow-up was ascertained from the follow-up forms filed after each visit and at the final visit. Morbid and mortal events occurring after onset of AF were taken into account for the analysis relating these events to AF.
By the end of the study period, all subjects were advised to receive active treatment. Further determination of vital status and cause of death of all SHEP participants throughout the year 2000 was performed by National Death Index matching (SHEP-Extension [SHEP-X] study).
Statistical Analysis
Comparison of baseline characteristics of the participants who developed AF during follow-up to subjects who maintained sinus rhythm was done by
2 tests for categorical variables and standard t tests for continuous variables. For events occurring during follow-up relative risks and percentage differences were calculated by proportional hazards regression analysis10 using the entire duration of follow-up during the SHEP study. For the all-cause and the total cardiovascular mortality a separate analysis was performed for a duration of 14.3 years follow-up (SHEP-X) with atrial fibrillation as a time-dependent variable.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2=12.7, P=0.0004). Aspirin use did not differ significantly between the two groups (12.2% versus 17.8%,
2=2, P=0.15).
|
Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in the SHEP Participants
The occurrence of cardiovascular events in the SHEP participants according to the AF status are presented in Tables 2 and 3
. Subjects who developed AF were more likely to experience cardiovascular events, left ventricular failure, and rapid death than participants who maintained sinus rhythm. In 26 (26.5%) of the 98 subjects who developed AF the arrhythmia preceded the occurrence of cardiovascular events, whereas in 15 (15.3%) participants AF followed a cardiovascular event. There were no cardiovascular events observed in the remaining 57 (58.1%) subjects who developed AF during the study follow-up.
|
|
All-cause and total cardiovascular mortality were significantly increased in the hypertensives who developed AF at both 4.7 years and 14.3 years follow-up (Table 3).
Participants who developed cardiovascular events after AF onset were mostly men and used alcohol daily or near daily (Table 4).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The incidence of AF in SHEP reported here (2.06% during 4.5 years average follow-up) is similar to that previously published. A slightly lower incidence of AF than in the Framingham study3 may be explained by a selection bias attributable to the initial inclusion criteria in the SHEP trial (clinical trial patients being with less comorbidities at baseline, and as such being less likely to develop AF). Subjects who developed AF in the SHEP were significantly older and were more likely to have ECG abnormalities at baseline when compared with the participants who maintained sinus rhythm. These data suggest that ECG abnormalities in elderly persons with isolated systolic hypertension identify a subset with higher risk of developing AF.
The incidence of AF did not differ significantly between subjects randomized to active treatment or placebo. The mean of all systolic BP measurements during 4.5 years of follow-up was significantly higher in the AF group. This suggests that a poor blood pressure control increases the risk of developing AF.
Cardiovascular Events and Atrial Fibrillation in the SHEP Study
In the general population AF has been associated with an increased mortality (relative risk of 1.92 for all causes and 1.82 for cardiovascular death excluding stroke13; relative risk of 1.31 for total and 1.41 for cardiovascular mortality12; odds ratio of 1.5 in men and 1.9 in women for total mortality14). In the SHEP study hypertensives with AF had a higher total cardiovascular death rate than participants who maintained sinus rhythm at both 4.7 and 14.3 years. This was, most likely, one of the contributors of a significantly higher all cause mortality in the subjects who developed AF at 4.7 and 14.3 years.
Atrial fibrillation has been reported to increase the risk for both fatal (RR 6.9 in men15; RR 2.7 in men and 5.6 in women13; RR 2.48 in men12) and nonfatal stroke (RR 2.6 to 4.516). However, the rates of fatal and nonfatal stroke and of TIAs did not differ between participants with and without AF in the SHEP study.
SHEP participants with AF had a significantly higher risk for total (RR 5.10; 95% CI 3.12 to 8.37) and nonfatal (RR 5.31; 95% CI 3.09 to 9.13) left ventricular failure when compared with subjects who maintained sinus rhythm. Hypertension control prevents heart failure in the elderly hypertensives.17 It is possible that the higher SBP observed during the study in the subjects with AF is responsible for the increased risk for left ventricular failure. The relative risk for left ventricular failure in the participants with AF (5.10 for total, 4.87 for fatal, and 5.31 for nonfatal left ventricular failure) in SHEP was higher than the RR for congestive heart failure (2.98) in AF subjects reported in previous studies.13 This observation suggests that hypertension and AF may have a synergistic effect for the development of congestive heart failure.
In SHEP, participants with AF had a higher risk for total (RR 1.88; 95% CI 0.85 to 4.15) and nonfatal (RR 2.09; 95% CI 0.86 to 5.04) myocardial infarction than subjects who maintained sinus rhythm. This finding can be explained by the higher prevalence of baseline ECG abnormalities in the former group (80.4% versus 60.6%, P<0.001), as a possible marker of extensive coronary artery disease in hypertensives with AF.
The LIFE study revealed that losartan (when compared with atenolol) significantly reduced the onset of AF as well as the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensives with history of AF.18 Chlorthalidone and atenolol, used in the SHEP trial, failed to decrease the incidence of AF as well as its association with more cardiovascular events in the elderly hypertensives when compared with placebo. However, the SHEP study was not designed to prevent occurrence of AF in hypertensives (the actual detected power in our analysis was 23%, corresponding to a reduction of AF from 2.32% in the placebo group to 1.82% in the treated group).
Limitations
This analysis of the SHEP database is a retrospective study and as such presents several limitations. Atrial fibrillation was not one of the major prespecified outcomes in SHEP, and its occurrence was retrieved from follow-up forms. Treatment of new onset AF (rate control or cardioversion) and anticoagulation for chronic AF were not specifically addressed in SHEP. It is also unclear how many other subjects developed AF after completion of the original SHEP study. Our conclusions cannot be generalized to other groups of hypertensives which were not represented in the SHEP. With all these limitations, the design of the SHEP study (double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, exclusion of AF subjects at enrollment, close monitoring of cardiovascular events) makes it an appropriate database for studying AF in the elderly with isolated arterial hypertension. It offers also the unique opportunity to assess the effects of chlorthalidone or atenolol versus placebo in influencing the onset and course of AF in the elderly hypertensives.
Perspectives
In SHEP the incidence of AF was 2.06% over 4.5 years mean follow-up. Although the incidence of AF did not differ according to assignment to active treatment or placebo, poorer blood pressure control and baseline electrocardiographic abnormalities predicted AF. Elderly hypertensives with AF had significantly more total cardiovascular events, rapid death, total and nonfatal left ventricular failure than hypertensives who maintained sinus rhythm. The presence of AF in elderly hypertensives was associated with a significant increase in all cause and total cardiovascular mortality at 4.7 and 14.3 years follow-up.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Disclosures
None.
Received January 22, 2008; first decision February 8, 2008; accepted March 18, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155: 469–473.
3. Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Study. JAMA. 1994; 271: 840–844.
4. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 2N–9N.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Kuller LH, Kronmal RA, Cushman M, Fried LP, White R, Furberg CD, Rautaharju PM. Incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2455–2461.
6. Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154: 1449–1457.
7. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA. 1991; 265: 3255–3264.
8. Borhani NO, Applegate WB, Cutler JA, Davis BR, Furberg CD, Lakatos E, Page L, Perry HM, Smith WM, Probstfield JL. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). Part 1: rationale and design. Hypertension. 1991; 17: II2–II15.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Kostis JB, Prineas R, Curb JD, Lee M, Berkson D, Raines J, Frishman W, Francis CK, Sheffield T. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). Part 8: electrocardiographic characteristics. Hypertension. 1991; 17: II123–II151.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972; 34: 187–220.
11. Kitchin AH, Milne JS. Longitudinal survey of ischaemic heart disease in randomly selected sample of older population. Br Heart J. 1977; 39: 889–893.
12. Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB, Mathewson FA, Cuddy TE. The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba follow-up study. Am J Med. 1995; 98: 476–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Lake FR, Cullen KJ, de Klerk NH, McCall MG, Rosman DL. Atrial fibrillation and mortality in an elderly population. Aust NZ J Med. 1989; 19: 321–326.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death. Circulation. 1998; 98: 946–952.
15. Flegel KM, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Risk of stroke in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. Lancet. 1987; I: 526–529.
16. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991; 22: 983–988.
17. Kostis JB, Davis BR, Cutler J, Grimm RH Jr, Berge KG, Cohen JD, Lacy CR, Perry HM Jr, Blaufox MD, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Black HR, Schron E, Berkson DM, Curb JD, Smith WM, McDonald R, Applegate WB. Prevention of heart failure by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA. 1997; 278: 212–216.
18. Wachtell K, Lehto M, Gerdts E, Olsen MH, Hornestam B, Dahlöf B, Ibsen H, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Lindholm LH, Nieminen MS, Devereux RB. Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces new-onset atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke compared with atenolol: the Losartan Intervention for End Point Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 712–719.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |