(Hypertension. 2008;51:1611.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Department of Medicine (D.W.W., S.K.N., R.A.H., R.S.R.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla; Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine (D.W.W., R.S.R.), and Department of Exercise and Sport Science (R.S.R.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City,; and the Geriatric Research and Clinical Center (R.S.R.), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Correspondence to D. Walter Wray, Department of Medicine, Physiology Division, 9500 Gilman Dr, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0623. E-mail dwray{at}ucsd.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: basic science elderly blood flow regulation exercise angiotensin receptors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AT1 receptor sensitivity to Ang II in the elderly may be especially important in the context of underlying changes in autonomic function. It is well established that elevated vasoconstrictor tone as a consequence of high sympathetic nerve activity is present in healthy, older adults,7–9 despite a reduction in the sensitivity of postjunctional adrenergic vascular receptors.10 This capacity for sustained sympathetic vasoconstriction in the face of reduced adrenergic responsiveness may be suggestive of an age-related change in nonadrenergic vasoconstrictor pathways, such as Ang II. Clinically, further characterization of age-related changes in AT1 receptor function are particularly important, given that the combination of sympathetic and renin-angiotensin system activation adversely affects prognosis in renal and cardiovascular diseases.11
The age-related elevation in vascular tone and subsequent decline in resting limb blood flow subsists during exercise, with evidence from our group12,13 and others,14,15 for a reduction in exercise hyperemia in the leg of elderly subjects. The mechanisms responsible for this apparent reduction in vasodilatory capacity remain unknown, although studies in the forearm suggest that the augmented sympathetic vasoconstriction seen at rest may carry over during handgrip exercise in older individuals, resulting in a lesser "magnitude of sympatholysis" in older individuals.16,17 Again, the relatively higher vasoconstriction present during exercise in older individuals may not be adrenergic in nature, but rather may be partially attributed to altered sensitivity of nonadrenergic vasoconstrictor pathways. However, the degree to which Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction may be blunted during exercise has not been evaluated in the elderly.
Thus, the current study sought to evaluate the functional consequence of age-related changes in AT1 receptor sensitivity through determination of vasoconstriction in response to intra-arterial administration of exogenous Ang II at rest and during knee-extensor exercise. Specifically, we hypothesized the following: (1) AT1 receptor sensitivity would be elevated in older individuals compared with their younger counterparts; (2) knee-extensor exercise would blunt Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction in an intensity-dependent manner in both groups; and (3) older subjects would remain relatively more sensitive to Ang II than the young group during exercise.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Protocol
Subjects reported to the laboratory in a fasted state at 8 AM on the experimental day. A catheter was placed in the common femoral artery using sterile technique, and subjects rested for
30 minutes. After baseline measurements were obtained, Ang II was administered for 2.5 minutes (described below). After a 10-minute washout period, subjects exercised at 20% and 40% of their WRmax (determined on the preliminary visit) for 10 minutes at each exercise intensity, with drug infusion during the final 60 to 90 seconds of each exercise intensity. All of the data collection took place with subjects in a semirecumbent position (
60° reclined), and all of the studies were performed in a thermoneutral environment.
Drug Infusion
Ang II (Clinalfa, Bachem AG) was prepared at a concentration of 0.25 µg (
0.2 nmol) per milliliter of 0.9% sterile saline and infused for 2.5 minutes (rest) or 60 to 90 seconds (exercise) at a blood flow–adjusted rate of 0.8 ng (
0.8 pmol) per milliliter of leg blood flow. Immediately before infusion, real-time blood flow was determined using ultrasound Doppler, and infusion rate was blood flow adjusted according to these "on-the-fly" blood flow values to ensure similar effective concentrations of infused drugs across subjects, both at rest and during exercise. Thus, infusion rates varied between 0.5 and 15.0 mL/min, achieved using a constant speed infusion pump (Harvard Apparatus). For the present study, we selected a dose that would elicit significant vasoconstriction but limit the risk of systemic spillover. In addition, in several subjects, we reproduced the dose-response curves for Ang II that we have documented previously in the young.18
In both age groups, initial studies identified a tendency for increased mean arterial blood pressure after 60 to 90 seconds of continuous infusion during exercise, suggesting that Ang II effects were no longer limited to the leg. Thus, to avoid a potential pressor effect, Ang II infusion was stopped after 90 seconds at 20% WRmax and after 60 seconds at 40% WRmax.
Exercise Model
A knee-extensor exercise paradigm was implemented in this study,19,20 because this approach allows examination of exercising skeletal muscle hemodynamics without central cardiovascular limitations. Subjects were seated on an adjustable chair, with a cycle ergometer (model 828e, Monark Exercise AB) placed behind them. Resistance was provided by friction on the flywheel, which was turned by the subject via a metal bar connected to the crank of the ergometer and a boot attached to the ankle of the subject. Sixty contractions per minute were maintained at each work rate. The 20% and 40% WRmax exercise intensities were selected to minimize the amount of infused drug and, thus, to limit systemic spillover and also to avoid exercise-induced increases in sympathetic nerve activity, which could confound the observed vasoconstriction in response to Ang II infusion.
Measurements
Leg blood flow was evaluated using an ultrasound Doppler device (Logiq 7, GE Medical Systems) equipped with a linear array transducer operating at an imaging frequency of 10 MHz. The common femoral artery was insonated 2 to 3 cm proximal to the bifurcation of the common femoral artery into the superficial and deep branches. The blood velocity profile was obtained using the same transducer with a Doppler frequency of 4.0 to 5.0 MHz, operated in the high-pulsed repetition frequency mode (2 to 25 kHz), and the sample volume was placed at a depth of 1.5 to 3.5 cm and maximized according to vessel size. All of the blood velocity measurements were obtained with the probe appropriately positioned to maintain an insonation angle of
60°. At all of the sample points, arterial diameter and angle-corrected, intensity-weighted mean blood velocity (Vmean) values were calculated using commercially available software (Logiq 7, GE Medical Systems). Using measured artery diameter and Vmean, blood flow was calculated as follows: blood flow (mL/min)=Vmeanx
x(vessel diameter/2)2x60.
Before catheterization, arterial blood pressure was determined using manual auscultation (Table 1). After catheter placement, arterial blood pressure measurements were collected continually from within the femoral artery (Table 2), with the pressure transducer placed at the level of the catheter (Transpac IV, Abbot Laboratories). Mean arterial pressure (mm Hg) was calculated as follows: diastolic arterial pressure+(arterial pulse pressurex0.33). Leg vascular conductance (mL · min–1 · mm Hg–1) was calculated as follows: leg blood flow/mean arterial pressure. Heart rate was monitored from a standard 3-lead ECG, recorded in duplicate on the data acquisition device (BIOPAC Systems Inc) and as an integral part of the Doppler system (Logiq 7, GE Medical Systems).
|
|
Data Analysis and Statistics
Ultrasound images and Doppler velocity waveforms were measured continuously, with repeated 45-second segments recorded digitally before and during drug infusions. For each 45-second ultrasound Doppler segment, Vmean was averaged across 15-second intervals of each recorded clip, with intima-to-intima diameter measurements evaluated during diastole, as described previously.20,21 Because of the anticipated decline in maximal knee-extensor exercise capacity in older subjects, the a priori design was to assess responses at similar relative exercise intensities. However, posthoc analysis of responses using a single absolute work rate of 10 W was also performed to evaluate potential age-related differences at comparable levels of leg O2 consumption.
Statistics were performed with the use of commercially available software (SigmaStat 3.10, Systat Software Inc). For both groups, sample size determination was performed based on Ang II–induced changes in measured variables at β
0.8. Repeated-measure ANOVA, ANOVA, and Student t tests were used to identify significant changes in measured variables within and between groups and across exercise intensities, with the Holm-Sidak test used for posthoc analysis when a significant main effect was found. All of the group data are expressed as means±SEs.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ang II at Rest and During Exercise
At rest, continuous infusion of Ang II (0.8 ng/mL of leg blood flow per minute) did not significantly change the heart rate, femoral artery diameter, or mean arterial blood pressure in either group after 2.5 minutes of continuous infusion (Table 2). However, this infusion did provoke a significant and marked reduction in leg blood flow (–117±25 mL/min, young; –183±22 mL/min, old) and leg vascular conductance (–1.2±0.1 mL/min per mm Hg, young; –2.1±0.2 mL/min per mm Hg, old), which were significantly greater in older subjects compared with their younger counterparts (Table 2 and Figure 1). Dose-response curves assessed in several subjects revealed a near-maximal response to Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction for both groups at the flow-adjusted dose used in the present study.
|
Similar to rest, Ang II infusion for 90 seconds (20% WRmax) or 60 seconds (40% WRmax) during exercise did not elicit changes in heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, or common femoral artery diameter in either group (Table 2). However, Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction was blunted during knee extensor exercise in both young and old subjects. At 20% WRmax, Ang II significantly reduced leg blood flow (–474±80 mL/min;
21% decrease) and leg vascular conductance (–5±1 mL/min per mm Hg;
22% decrease) in the young group, whereas no significant vasoconstriction was observed in older volunteers. At 40% WRmax, vasoconstriction to Ang II was abolished in both the young and older groups (Figure 1). Posthoc examination of responses to Ang II at a similar absolute work rate (10±1 W, young; 11±1 W, older) again identified a significantly greater reduction in both leg blood flow and leg vascular conductance between young and old (Figure 2).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AT1 Receptor Sensitivity at Rest
Using equivalent doses of Ang II between groups, the present study has identified a greater Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction in healthy, older adults compared with their younger counterparts at rest (Table 2 and Figure 1). This finding is in contrast to those of Hogikyan and Supiano,6 who reported similar percentage changes in forearm blood flow between young and older volunteers to intra-arterial Ang II infusion in the brachial artery, a disparity that may be attributed to significant differences in methodology between studies. This previous study was performed in the forearm, used venous occlusion plethysmography and administered Ang II in incrementally increasing doses that evoked a systemic pressor response. In contrast, we performed ultrasound Doppler measurements of leg blood flow to a single, blood flow–adjusted dose on Ang II with no indication of systemic spillover. In addition, several recent studies have identified clear limb-specific responses to pharmacological and physiological stimuli,22 as well as significant differences in tonic vasoconstriction between limbs in the elderly.23 Thus, the current data extend this earlier work in the forearm, demonstrating for the first time a significant increase in AT1 receptor sensitivity in the leg vasculature of healthy elderly individuals at rest.
Although the mechanism for increased AT1 responsiveness may be as simple as receptor upregulation in response to reduced substrate,24 this pathway may become an increasingly important regulator of peripheral hemodynamics with advancing age. Recent studies have identified a reduction in postjunctional
-adrenergic receptor sensitivity in both the arm25 and leg of older individuals,26 yet
-adrenergic blockade in this population does not completely restore hemodynamics to that of the young.27 We speculate that this observation is suggestive of a significant contribution from other, nonadrenergic receptor groups, such as Ang II; however, further studies involving pharmacological blockade of AT1 receptors are required to more completely address the contribution of this pathway to the reduced skeletal muscle blood flow in the elderly.
Additional considerations for the observed increase in Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction with age include the potential role of alternate AT1 and ANG II type 2 receptor populations and the contribution of age-specific variations in endothelium-dependant vasodilation on the observed responses. Regarding the previous, it is important to consider the potential impact of age on AT1 receptors located on postganglionic sympathetic nerves, which, when bound, can potentiate release and inhibit reuptake of the sympathetic neurotransmitter norepinephrine.28 If this receptor group were to demonstrate an increased sensitivity with age, Ang II–mediated sympathetic vasoconstriction may have been augmented to a greater extent in the elderly. However, any potential amplifying effect on Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction would be mitigated by the well-documented decrease in postjunctional
-adrenergic sensitivity with advancing age.10 In addition, there is recent evidence for the presence of the ANG II type 2 receptor subtype in skeletal muscle microcirculation, which may promote Ang II–mediated vasodilation, although recent studies suggest that a minimal impact of this subtype on limb blood flow is in healthy adults.29 Regarding the potential contribution of endothelium-mediated vasodilation, it is noteworthy that a decline in NO and prostanoid vasodilator pathways has been reported with advancing age,30 such that the responses to Ang II in the elderly in the present study may have been amplified by virtue of a decrease in vasodilatory opposition in the form of endogenous NO and prostaglandins.
Ang II–Mediated Vasoconstriction During Exercise
During exercise, perfusion to active skeletal muscle must increase according to the metabolic demand of the tissue. Although the mechanisms governing this event are far from certain, there exists evidence in humans for a reduction in the effectiveness of both adrenergic31–33 and nonadrenergic18,34 vasoconstrictor pathways to facilitate the requisite hyperemic response. The potential involvement of endogenous Ang II in the regulation of exercise hyperemia is supported by the acute increase in circulating Ang II during exercise,35 as well as the profound hemodynamic effect seen when AT1 receptor blockade is applied during exercise. Indeed, pretreatment with the AT1 antagonist losartan has been shown to significantly decrease systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure during exercise compared with the unblocked state,36,37 indicating that Ang II is an important component of the systemic cardiovascular response to dynamic exercise.
Although this previous work using AT1 receptor blockade identified a significant role of endogenous Ang II during exercise, potential metabolic inhibition of this receptor group was not examined. Members of our group have recently addressed this issue though acute, intra-arterial administration of exogenous Ang II in younger subjects at rest and during light- and moderate-intensity exercise and reported a significant decrease in leg blood flow with Ang II infusion at rest, which was blunted in an intensity-dependent manner during knee-extensor exercise.18 Data from the present study extend these findings to an elderly cohort, who also experienced a diminished response to exogenous Ang II administration during exercise (Table 2 and Figure 1). It is noteworthy that the knee-extensor exercise capacity was reduced in older subjects (Table 1), and, thus, 20% and 40% WRmax represent lower absolute work in this group. However, between-group differences are only amplified when young and older groups are compared at a single absolute work rate (Figure 2), confirming the presence of an age-related diminution in Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction during exercise.
This age-dependent effect is even more pronounced when the change in AT1 sensitivity from rest to exercise is compared. In view of the greatly enhanced Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction in the elderly at rest, the "magnitude of attenuation" in leg blood flow from rest to 40% WRmax exercise is much greater in the older (50% to 60%) compared with the young (10% to 20%) group (Figures 1 and 2
). These data are suggestive of a powerful mechanism within the active muscle tissue, likely multiple byproducts of aerobic and/or anaerobic metabolism, that is capable of overcoming the potent vasoconstrictor effects of Ang II and, again, indicates that age-related elevations in resting AT1 receptor sensitivity do not contribute significantly to the blunted exercise hyperemia widely observed in the elderly.12–15 Indeed, it seems that the profound "lysing" of both nonadrenergic (Figure 1) and adrenergic16 vasoconstriction may be nondiscriminate yet essential events in the overall series of reactions that collectively produce a sufficient increase in skeletal muscle blood flow, raising the degree of exercise hyperemia in the elderly cohort toward that of the young.
Perspectives
The present data demonstrating an elevated AT1 receptor sensitivity in healthy, older adults at rest may be particularly relevant to the progression of cardiovascular disease states characterized by an elevation in both sympathetic nerve activity and Ang II, such as hypertension and heart failure.38,39 Current recognition of the underlying AT1 sensitivity in the healthy elderly may present a pathway that is particularly susceptible to Ang II–mediated vasoconstriction and associated pressor effects. Indeed, a large number of clinical trials have been undertaken to examine AT1 receptor blockade and have shown this therapy to be efficacious in reducing resting arterial blood pressure,40 vascular compliance,41 and vascular tone42 in patients. Thus, we speculate that the present data identifying an apparent hypersensitivity of the AT1 receptor population in this older, normotensive cohort may provide evidence of a pathway by which hypertension may develop, although further studies are needed to further examine this issue.
Recent clinical trials examining the efficacy of AT1 blockade to improve exercise capacity in patients with hypertension or heart failure have produced mixed results, with evidence for43,44 and against45,46 the beneficial effects of this intervention. However, exercise capacity in these patients is often determined by a central cardiovascular limitation, and, thus, outcome of these studies may be due to improvements in cardiac rather than skeletal muscle function. This concept is supported by the observed improvement in myocardial blood flow during exercise after AT1 receptor blockade in animals.36 Nonetheless, the current finding of blunted AT1 receptor responsiveness during small muscle mass exercise in healthy, older adults suggests that elevated AT1 receptor sensitivity in the elderly at rest does not carry over to exercise, and, thus, this age-related adaptation does not appear to present a functional limitation to skeletal muscle vasodilation during exercise.
Experimental Considerations
It should be noted that, whereas the experimental paradigm of exogenous Ang II administration allows determination of AT1 receptor sensitivity, it is not designed to characterize the interaction of AT1 receptors with endogenous Ang II. For this reason, endogenous levels of Ang II were not assessed in the present study, and, thus, the effect of exercise on plasma [Ang II] in this paradigm remains uncertain.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported in part grants from the National Institutes of Health (T32 HL07212-28), the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (15RT-0100), and the Francis Family Foundation.
Disclosures
None.
Received January 30, 2008; first decision February 22, 2008; accepted March 16, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Duggan J, Nussberger J, Kilfeather S, O'Malley K. Aging and human hormonal and pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II infusion with simultaneous measurement of exogenous and endogenous angiotensin II. Am J Hypertens. 1993; 6: 641–647.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Duggan J, Kilfeather S, O'Brien E, O'Malley K, Nussberger J. Effects of aging and hypertension on plasma angiotensin II and platelet angiotensin II receptor density. Am J Hypertens. 1992; 5: 687–693.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Siebers MJ, Goodfriend TL, Ball D, Elliott ME. Analysis of angiotensin II binding to human platelets: differences in young and old subjects. J Gerontol. 1990; 45: B42–B47.
5. Takeda R, Morimoto S, Uchida K, Miyamori I, Hashiba T. Effect of age on plasma aldosterone response to exogenous angiotensin II in normotensive subjects. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1980; 94: 552–558.
6. Hogikyan RV, Supiano MA. Arterial alpha-adrenergic responsiveness is decreased and SNS activity is increased in older humans. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266: E717–E724.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Dinenno FA, Jones PP, Seals DR, Tanaka H. Limb blood flow and vascular conductance are reduced with age in healthy humans: relation to elevations in sympathetic nerve activity and declines in oxygen demand. Circulation. 1999; 100: 164–170.
8. Sundlof G, Wallin BG. Human muscle nerve sympathetic activity at rest. Relationship to blood pressure and age. J Physiol. 1978; 274: 621–637.
9. Seals DR, Dinenno FA. Collateral damage: cardiovascular consequences of chronic sympathetic activation with human aging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 287: H1895–H1905.
10. Dinenno FA, Dietz NM, Joyner MJ. Aging and forearm postjunctional alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction in healthy men. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1349–1354.
11. Brewster UC, Setaro JF, Perazella MA. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: cardiorenal effects and implications for renal and cardiovascular disease states. Am J Med Sci. 2003; 326: 15–24.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lawrenson L, Poole JG, Kim J, Brown C, Patel P, Richardson RS. Vascular and metabolic response to isolated small muscle mass exercise: effect of age. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 285: H1023–H1031.
13. Poole JG, Lawrenson L, Kim J, Brown C, Richardson RS. Vascular and metabolic response to cycle exercise in sedentary humans: effect of age. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H1251–H1259.
14. Beere PA, Russell SD, Morey MC, Kitzman DW, Higginbotham MB. Aerobic exercise training can reverse age-related peripheral circulatory changes in healthy older men. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1085–1094.
15. Proctor DN, Shen PH, Dietz NM, Eickhoff TJ, Lawler LA, Ebersold EJ, Loeffler DL, Joyner MJ. Reduced leg blood flow during dynamic exercise in older endurance-trained men. J Appl Physiol. 1998; 85: 68–75.
16. Dinenno FA, Masuki S, Joyner MJ. Impaired modulation of sympathetic alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction in contracting forearm muscle of ageing men. J Physiol. 2005; 567: 311–321.
17. Fadel PJ, Wang Z, Watanabe H, Arbique D, Vongpatanasin W, Thomas GD. Augmented sympathetic vasoconstriction in exercising forearms of postmenopausal women is reversed by oestrogen therapy. J Physiol. 2004; 561: 893–901.
18. Brothers RM, Haslund ML, Wray DW, Raven PB, Sander M. Exercise-induced inhibition of angiotensin II vasoconstriction in human thigh muscle. J Physiol. 2006; 577: 727–737.
19. Andersen P, Adams RP, Sjogaard G, Thorboe A, Saltin B. Dynamic knee extension as model for study of isolated exercising muscle in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1985; 59: 1647–1653.
20. Wray DW, Uberoi A, Lawrenson L, Richardson RS. Heterogeneous limb vascular responsiveness to shear stimuli during dynamic exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2005; 99: 81–86.
21. Donato AJ, Uberoi A, Wray DW, Nishiyama S, Lawrenson L, Richardson RS. Differential effects of aging on limb blood flow in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006; 290: H272–H278.
22. Wray DW, Richardson RS. Aging, exercise, and limb vascular heterogeneity in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 1804–1810.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Dinenno FA, Joyner MJ. Alpha-adrenergic control of skeletal muscle circulation at rest and during exercise in aging humans. Microcirculation. 2006; 13: 329–341.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Belmin J, Levy BI, Michel JB. Changes in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis in later life. Drugs Aging. 1994; 5: 391–400.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Dinenno FA, Eisenach JH, Dietz NM, Joyner MJ. Post-junctional alpha-adrenoceptors and basal limb vascular tone in healthy men. J Physiol. 2002; 540: 1103–1110.
26. Smith EG, Voyles WF, Kirby BS, Markwald RR, Dinenno FA. Ageing and leg postjunctional alpha-adrenergic vasoconstrictor responsiveness in healthy men. J Physiol. 2007; 582: 63–71.
27. Dinenno FA, Tanaka H, Stauffer BL, Seals DR. Reductions in basal limb blood flow and vascular conductance with human ageing: role for augmented alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction. J Physiol. 2001; 536: 977–983.
28. Starke K. Action of angiotensin on uptake, release and metabolism of 14C-noradrenaline by isolated rabbit hearts. Eur J Pharmacol. 1971; 14: 112–123.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Gilles R, Vingerhoedt N, Howes J, Griffin M, Howes LG. Increase in systemic blood pressure during intra-arterial PD123319 infusion: evidence for functional expression of angiotensin type 2 receptors in normal volunteers. Blood Press. 2004; 13: 110–114.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Singh N, Prasad S, Singer DR, MacAllister RJ. Ageing is associated with impairment of nitric oxide and prostanoid dilator pathways in the human forearm. Clin Sci (Lond). 2002; 102: 595–600.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Dinenno FA, Joyner MJ. Blunted sympathetic vasoconstriction in contracting skeletal muscle of healthy humans: is nitric oxide obligatory? J Physiol. 2003; 553: 281–292.
32. Wray DW, Fadel PJ, Smith ML, Raven P, Sander M. Inhibition of alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction in exercising human thigh muscles. J Physiol. 2004; 555: 545–563.
33. Rosenmeier JB, Dinenno FA, Fritzlar SJ, Joyner MJ. alpha1- and alpha2-adrenergic vasoconstriction is blunted in contracting human muscle. J Physiol. 2003; 547: 971–976.
34. Wray DW, Nishiyama SK, Donato AJ, Sander M, Wagner PD, Richardson RS. Endothelin-1-mediated vasoconstriction at rest and during dynamic exercise in healthy humans. Amer J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007; 293: H2550–H2556.[CrossRef]
35. Tidgren B, Hjemdahl P, Theodorsson E, Nussberger J. Renal neurohormonal and vascular responses to dynamic exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1991; 70: 2279–2286.
36. Stebbins CL, Symons JD. Role of angiotensin II in hemodynamic responses to dynamic exercise in miniswine. J Appl Physiol. 1995; 78: 185–190.
37. Symons JD, Stebbins CL. Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade during exercise: comparison of losartan and saralasin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996; 28: 223–231.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Appel GB, Appel AS. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists: role in hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and renoprotection. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2004; 47: 105–115.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Ferrario CM. Role of angiotensin II in cardiovascular disease therapeutic implications of more than a century of research. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2006; 7: 3–14.
40. Burnier M. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers. Circulation. 2001; 103: 904–912.
41. Rosendorff C. Vascular hypertrophy in hypertension: role of the renin-angiotensin system. Mt Sinai J Med. 1998; 65: 108–117.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Newby DE, Goodfield NE, Flapan AD, Boon NA, Fox KA, Webb DJ. Regulation of peripheral vascular tone in patients with heart failure: contribution of angiotensin II. Heart. 1998; 80: 134–140.
43. Warner JG Jr, Metzger DC, Kitzman DW, Wesley DJ, Little WC. Losartan improves exercise tolerance in patients with diastolic dysfunction and a hypertensive response to exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 1567–1572.
44. Simpson KL, McClellan KJ. Losartan: a review of its use, with special focus on elderly patients. Drugs Aging. 2000; 16: 227–250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Zucker IH, Wang W, Brandle M, Schultz HD, Patel KP. Neural regulation of sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1995; 37: 397–414.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Rheaume C, Waib PH, Lacourciere Y, Cleroux J. Effects of angiotensin antagonism with tasosartan on regional and systemic haemodynamics in hypertensive patients. J Hyper. 1998; 16: 2085–2089.[CrossRef]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. W. Wray, S. K. Nishiyama, and R. S. Richardson Role of {alpha}1-adrenergic vasoconstriction in the regulation of skeletal muscle blood flow with advancing age Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2009; 296(2): H497 - H504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |