Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2008;51:e45-e46
Published online before print April 28, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.110486
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/6/e45    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.110486v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, K. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension

(Hypertension. 2008;51:e45.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Peripheral Augmentation Index and Wave Reflection in the Radial Artery

Alun D. Hughes; Justin E. Davies; Darrel Francis; Jamil Mayet

International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute Division, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom

Kim H. Parker

Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

To the Editor:

We were interested to read the recent article by Munir et al1 and congratulate them on making a valuable contribution to the field of pulse wave analysis. They and Payne and Webb, in their accompanying editorial,2 ponder why the late systolic shoulder (SBP2) corresponds so closely with central systolic blood pressure and suggest that selective modification of specific frequency components of the waveform may account for this. We agree with this (indeed, it is implicit in the widespread use of a transfer function to derive central blood pressure), but we consider that the physiological basis of this relationship is not readily apparent from this frequency-based interpretation. We concur with the belief by Payne and Webb2 that wave separation in the time domain may provide a clearer insight into the mechanisms involved, and we have undertaken such an analysis of the radial arterial waveform based on wave intensity analysis and data collected previously.3

Our findings are shown in the Figure. The data indicate that the characteristic peaked waveform seen in the radial artery is largely because of an early backward-traveling (reflected) compression wave that merges with the forward traveling compression wave attributable to cardiac ejection. This reflected wave elevates pressure and depresses flow. The early return of this wave is because of the relatively high wave speed in the radial and digital arteries and the proximity to the sites of impedance mismatching in the hand circulation.3 From the Figure, it is apparent that the SBP2 corresponds with a time in systole when the intensity of the backward compression wave has declined and before the arrival of a large forward expansion wave generated by deceleration of the rate of the ventricular contraction before closure of the aortic valve.4 The absence of significant wave intensity at the time of SBP2 means that pressure in the radial artery at this time should correspond relatively closely with aortic or central blood pressure, which is what Munir et al1 observed.


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure. Traces show (A) blood pressure, (B) flow velocity, and (C) calculated forward and backward wave intensity in the radial artery over a single cardiac cycle (t=0 is the peak of the R wave on ECG). Pressure and flow were measured using applanation tonometry and pulsed wave ultrasound, respectively (further details of methodology are given in Reference 3) and are derived from an ensemble average of 6 individual cycles. The data shown were recorded in a healthy 49-year-old man with a brachial blood pressure of 113/80 mm Hg. SBP2 is the late systolic shoulder as described by Munir et al,1 S is a forward compression wave generated by ventricular ejection, R1 is a backward reflected compression wave, and D is a forward expansion wave generated by ventricular deceleration. The period in late systole when there is no significant wave intensity is indicated by the arrow and the gray shading.

Our findings underline the value of wave intensity analysis and wave separation based on concurrent measurement of pressure and flow in understanding the hemodynamic events responsible for pressure wave morphology in the arterial tree and, we believe, provide a readily comprehensible explanation for the close correspondence between central systolic blood pressure and SBP2 reported by Munir et al.1


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

J.E.D. and D.F. are funded by fellowships from the British Heart Foundation.

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 
1. Munir S, Guilcher A, Kamalesh T, Clapp B, Redwood S, Marber M, Chowienczyk P. Peripheral augmentation index defines the relationship between central and peripheral pulse pressure. Hypertension. 2008; 51: 112–118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Payne RA, Webb DJ. Peripheral augmentation index: shouldering the central pressure load. Hypertension. 2008; 51: 37–38.[Free Full Text]

3. Zambanini A, Cunningham SL, Parker KH, Khir AW, McG Thom SA, Hughes AD. Wave-energy patterns in carotid, brachial, and radial arteries: a noninvasive approach using wave-intensity analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 289: H270–H276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Parker KH, Jones CJ, Dawson JR, Gibson DG. What stops the flow of blood from the heart? Heart Vessels. 1988; 4: 241–245.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Munir, A. Guilcher, B. Clapp, S. Redwood, M. Marber, and P. Chowienczyk
Response to Peripheral Augmentation Index and Wave Reflection in the Radial Artery
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): e47 - e47.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/6/e45    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.110486v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, K. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension